Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 125
Filtrar
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 28: e934931, 2022 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34987147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND The human microbiota modulates the immune system and forms the surface flora. Antibiotic administration causes dysbiosis in the intestinal flora. It is not clear if antibiotic administration in the community effects the upper airway flora in the mid-term or long-term. This study aims to define long-term influence of antibiotics on upper airway flora. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective study, aerobic microbiological analysis of nasal and nasopharyngeal surfaces was performed. Antibiotic administration history of the last 6 months was retrieved using the social insurance database. Culture results of antibiotic-treated and antibiotic-naïve subjects were compared by Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 210 subjects were included in the study. Normal flora were documented in 86 nasal swabs and 99 nasopharyngeal swabs. Most of the remaining cases demonstrated gram-positive bacterial overgrowth. There were 113 subjects who did not receive any antibiotic, and 93% of the remaining 97 patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Statistical analysis showed that nasal and nasopharyngeal flora did not change upon antibiotic administration, but antibiotic administration during the last month caused increased methicillin resistance development of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic exposure did not lead to perturbations in general composition of upper airway flora within 6 months, although the incidence of methicillin resistance in coagulase-positive and -negative Staphylococci demonstrated significant increases when patients received antibiotic during the last month. This should be considered in case of broad-spectrum antibiotic administration, since methicillin resistance increases the morbidity and mortality of nosocomial Staphylococcus infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacterias Aerobias , Infección Hospitalaria , Microbiota , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Bacterias Aerobias/clasificación , Bacterias Aerobias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Aerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Microbiota/efectos de los fármacos , Microbiota/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(4): 1234-1237, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565961

RESUMEN

We describe rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria among patients in dedicated coronavirus disease care units in a hospital in Maryland, USA, during May-June 2020. Critical illness, high antibiotic use, double occupancy of single rooms, and modified infection prevention practices were key contributing factors. Surveillance culturing aided in outbreak recognition and control.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Control de Infecciones , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Sobreinfección , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Maryland/epidemiología , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/normas , Factores Desencadenantes , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/microbiología
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(1): 84-88, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703320
4.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(4): 357-361, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33096202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microbiological tests are required for individuals on HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), but their real-life numbers, types and cost are poorly described. METHODS: Number, type, and results of microbiological tests performed in a Besançon Hospital-associated laboratory, France, from 2016 to 2019, in the setting of PrEP consultations were retrospectively collected. Costs were estimated by the current reimbursement rate set by the French national protection system. RESULTS: 756 consultations for PrEP initiation or follow-up of 135 persons were performed over 4 years. Among 3434 tests performed in the institution-associated laboratory, 1083 and 2351 were virological and bacteriological tests, respectively. Serology was predominant in virology (98% of virological tests), with HIV, HCV, and HBV screening as the 3 more frequent assays, whereas molecular biology was predominant in bacteriology (63.1% of bacteriological tests) with N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis screening as leader assays. Agar-based culture accounted for 1% of bacterial tests. The global cost of microbiological tests was 45,983.20 euros, corresponding to a mean cost of 60.80 euros per consultation. Virological and bacteriological tests accounted for 37.7% and 62.3% of this budget, respectively. No seroconversion was observed for HIV or HCV. N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis were detected at least once in 39.3% and 22.4% of individuals, respectively, with 15% of symptomatic episodes in both cases. Active syphilis infection was detected in 15.4% of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Since numerous microbiological tests are required during PrEP, the availability of specific technical platforms should not be neglected by centers wishing to set up PrEP consultations.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Técnicas Microbiológicas/economía , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Adulto , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/microbiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/virología , Virología/economía , Virología/métodos
5.
Front Public Health ; 8: 258, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32656174

RESUMEN

Background: Access to clinical bacteriology in low resource settings (LRS) is a key bottleneck preventing individual patient management of treatable severe infections, detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and implementation of effective stewardship interventions. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of a practical bundle of interventions aimed at implementing sustainable clinical bacteriology services at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and report on cost and intensity of supervision. Methods: Starting in Dec 2015, an intervention based on the CLSI QMS01-A guideline was established, consisting of (i) an initial needs assessment, (ii) development of key standard operating procedures, (iii) adaptation of processes for LRS, (iv) training and supervision of laboratory staff via consultant visits and existing online resources, and (v) implementation of a practical quality systems approach. A guiding principle of the bundle was sustainability of all interventions post implementation. Outcomes and challenges: An initial investment of ~US$ 26,200 for laboratory reagents, and a total of 50 visit-days per year from three Canadian and Norwegian microbiologists were committed. Twelve SOPs, including antimicrobial susceptibility testing, were adapted, and an automated blood culture platform was donated (bioMerieux). In the first 18 months of implementation of the intervention, the average volume of specimens analyzed in the lab went from 15/day to 75/day. The number of blood cultures tested increased from an average of 2/day to over 45/day. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was introduced and cumulative antibiograms were generated for the institution. Quality control was implemented for all procedures and quality assurance tools implemented included external quality assurance and proficiency testing of six technologists with longitudinal follow-up. The laboratory is on the path toward SLIPTA accreditation by the African Society for Laboratory Medicine. Reagent costs, staff training and retention, and engagement of clinical personnel with the lab proved to be manageable challenges. Key external challenges include in-country supply-chain management issues, lack of competition among distributors, and foreign-currency exchange distortions. Conclusions: Using a relatively low-intensity intervention based on existing training tools and accreditation schemes, we demonstrate that establishment of reasonable-quality clinical bacteriology is not only within reach but also a critical step toward assessing the burden of AMR in settings like this one and implementing effective stewardship strategies.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Bacteriología , Laboratorios de Hospital/normas , Personal de Laboratorio/educación , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Acreditación , Bacteriología/normas , Países en Desarrollo , Etiopía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital/economía , Técnicas Microbiológicas/normas , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta
6.
Rev Mal Respir ; 37(7): 561-571, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684338

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Common major pathogens like Pseudomonas aeruginosa are identified in the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. However, other opportunistic bacterial pathogens like Achromobacter xylosoxidans complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and non-tuberculous mycobacteria are currently emerging in CF and are also reported in non-CF bronchiectasis. BACKGROUND: The emergence of opportunistic bacterial pathogens has been recognized in CF through annual national reports of sputum microbiology data. Despite common factors driving the emergence of bacteria identified in CF and non-CF bronchiectasis patients, bronchiectasis registries have been created more recently and no longitudinal analysis of recorded microbiological data is currently available in the literature, thereby preventing the recognition of emerging bacteria in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis. OUTLOOK: A longitudinal follow-up of microbiological data is still needed in non-CF bronchiectasis to identify emerging opportunistic bacterial pathogens. Homogeneity in practice of sputum microbiological examination is also required to allow comparative analysis of data in CF and non-CF bronchiectasis. CONCLUSION: Bacterial pathogens recognized as emerging in CF have to be more carefully monitored in non-CF bronchiectasis in view of their association with deterioration of the lung disease.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiectasia/microbiología , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Microbiología/tendencias , Fibrosis Pulmonar/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Bronquiectasia/complicaciones , Bronquiectasia/epidemiología , Bronquiectasia/terapia , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/terapia , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Fibrosis Quística/epidemiología , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Humanos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/tendencias , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Monitoreo Fisiológico/tendencias , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/microbiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/terapia , Fibrosis Pulmonar/complicaciones , Fibrosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Fibrosis Pulmonar/terapia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Esputo/microbiología
7.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 59(1): 101-106, 2020 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692695

RESUMEN

Objectives: The new European In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Regulation 2017/746 (IVDR) restricts the use of lab-developed tests (LDT) after 26th May 2022. There are no data on the impact of the IVDR on laboratories in the European Union. Methods: Laboratory tests performed in UZ Leuven were divided in four groups: core laboratory, immunology, special chemistry, and molecular microbiology testing. Each test was classified as Conformité Européenne (CE)-IVD, modified/off-label CE-IVD, commercial Research Use Only (RUO) or LDT. Each matrix was considered a separate test. Results: We found that 97.6% of the more than 11.5 million results/year were generated with a CE-IVD method. Of the 922 different laboratory tests, however, only 41.8% were CE-IVD, 10.8% modified/off-label CE-IVD, 0.3% RUO, and 47.1% LDT. Off-label CE-IVD was mainly used to test alternative matrices not covered by the claim of the manufacturer (e.g., pleural or peritoneal fluid). LDTs were mainly used for special chemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular testing. Excluding flow cytometry, the main reasons for the use of 377 LDTs were lack of a CE-IVD method (71.9%), analytical requirements (14.3%), and the fact the LDT was in use before CE-IVD available (11.9%). Conclusions: While the large majority of results (97.6%) were generated with a CE-IVD method, only 41.8% of laboratory tests were CE-IVD. There is currently no alternative on the market for 71.5% of the 537 LDTs performed in our laboratory which do not fall within the scope of the current IVD directive (IVDD). Compliance with the IVDR will require a major investment of time and effort.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Universitarios/normas , Laboratorios de Hospital/normas , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/normas , Bélgica , Técnicas de Química Analítica/normas , Técnicas de Química Analítica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas/normas , Pruebas Inmunológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Laboratorios de Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Laboratorios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/normas , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
J Infect Dis ; 221(Suppl 2): S198-S205, 2020 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In China, no national survey has been conducted to evaluate physicians' attitudes and compliance with guidelines in the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate physicians' awareness of the use of microbiological tests in the management of severe CAP (SCAP) and to investigate the availability of nonculture tests in China. METHODS: A nationwide electronic questionnaire survey was conducted among Chinese physicians between March and July 2018, which assessed their viewpoints concerning the issues in the management of SCAP. RESULTS: A total of 6333 physicians completed this survey, evenly covering all career stages. Among these, 3208 (50.6%) and 1936 (30.6%) had blind spots in the application of blood and sputum cultures in the management of SCAP, respectively. Nonteaching hospital, nonrespirologists, and junior career stage were independently associated with misunderstandings. Regarding nonculture methods, 52.7% of the facilities had no access to polymerase chain reaction-based pathogen detection tests. The accessibility of urinary antigen tests for Streptococcus pneumoniae (42.5%) and Legionella pneumophila (38.5%) was also low. The main barriers were inland and remote region, lower hospital level, and nonteaching hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient use of sputum and blood cultures, together with low accessibility of major nonculture techniques, were noticeable barriers to achieving microbiological diagnosis of SCAP in China. To help curb the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, further measures should be taken to raise awareness among nonspecialists and promote rapid nonculture tests, especially in nonteaching hospitals and developing regions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Cultivo de Sangre , China , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Hospitales , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/inmunología , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Neumonía/microbiología , Esputo/microbiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 102, 2020 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32013908

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimising antimicrobial overuse is needed to limit antimicrobial resistance. There is little evidence on how often microbiological testing informs antimicrobial de-escalation (e.g. stopping, shortening duration, switching to narrower spectrum or intravenous to oral switch) at 48-72 h "review and revise". We performed a patient level analysis of diagnostic microbiology and antimicrobial prescribing to determine the impact of microbiology results on antimicrobial review outcomes. METHODS: Antimicrobial prescribing data were collected for hospitalised adults from across Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust using routine monthly audits of prescribing practice from July 2016 to April 2017. Microbiology testing data for cultures of blood, urine, sputum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were gathered from the hospital pathology database and linked to prescriptions with matching patient identification codes. Antimicrobial prescriptions were grouped into "prescription episodes" (PEs), defined as one or more antimicrobials prescribed to the same patient for the same indication. Medical records were reviewed for all PEs with positive microbiology and a randomised sample of those with negative results to assess the impact of the microbiology result on the antimicrobial prescription(s). RESULTS: After excluding topical and prophylactic prescriptions, data were available for 382 inpatient antimicrobial prescriptions grouped into 276 prescription episodes. 162/276 (59%) had contemporaneous microbiology sent. After filtering likely contaminants, 33/276 (12%) returned relevant positive results, of which 20/33 (61%) had antimicrobials changed from empiric therapy as a result with 6/33 (18%) prompting de-escalation. Positive blood and CSF tended to have greater impact than urine or sputum cultures. 124/276 (45%) PEs returned only negative microbiology, and this was documented in the medical notes less often (9/40, 23%) than positive results (28/33, 85%). Out of 40 reviewed PEs with negative microbiology, we identified just one (~ 3%) in which antimicrobials were unambiguously de-escalated following the negative result. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of diagnostic microbiology tests sent to inform clinical management yielded negative results. However, negative microbiology contributed little to clinical decision making about antimicrobial de-escalation, perhaps reflecting a lack of trust in negative results by treating clinicians. Improving the negative predictive value of currently available diagnostic microbiology could help hospital prescribers in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/microbiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Inglaterra , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infecciones/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esputo/microbiología , Orina/microbiología
11.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(2): 287-291, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31696398

RESUMEN

Microbiology services provided to hospitals must be delivered 24 h a day. In addition to during routine so-called 'office hours', clinical microbiologists have to provide an on-call service 7 days a week. However, there are few data on what that involves and how the service is delivered. I reviewed the source, reason for, grade of staff from whom the call came and the need for any follow-up, over an 11-year period using a pro-forma, that had been used to review data before this time period. Details were available for 90% of calls received, and data from 809 calls were analysed. The sources of calls were most commonly from medicine specialties [163/809 (20.1%)], neurosurgery (which is a national referral centre) [148/809 (18.3%)] and the intensive care unit [143/809 (17.7%)]. The number of calls received between 23.00 hours and 07.00 hours was 107 (13.2%). Just over half of calls, i.e. 440/809 (54.6%), were related to treatment; 247/809 (30.5%) were for advice on diagnosis; and 79/809 (9.8%) were related to infection prevention and control (IPC) issues. Registrars (a senior training grade) accounted for 492/809 (60.8%) of calls, and 64/809 (7.9%) came from nurses mainly related to IPC matters. Overall, 25.4% (206/809) of calls required follow-up the next day but this increased from 4.5% in 2013 to 67.6% in 2018. The nature of calls received by a clinical microbiologist out-of-hours is varied and may be increasing due to the complexity of case mix and changes in medical staffing. Professional and other organisations would do well to review such workload when deciding on staffing levels and service planning, given increasing public and patient expectations, and the trend towards the centralisation/consolidation of laboratory diagnostic services.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono , Humanos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Carga de Trabajo
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 769, 2019 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31481123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health-workers in developing countries rely on clinical algorithms, such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI), for the management of patients, including diagnosis of serious bacterial infections (SBI). The diagnostic accuracy of IMCI in detecting children with SBI is unknown. Prediction rules and guidelines for SBI from well-resourced countries at outpatient level may help to improve current guidelines; however, their diagnostic performance has not been evaluated in resource-limited countries, where clinical conditions, access to care, and diagnostic capacity differ. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of existing prediction rules and clinical guidelines in identifying children with SBI in a cohort of febrile children attending outpatient health facilities in Tanzania. METHODS: Structured literature review to identify available prediction rules and guidelines aimed at detecting SBI and retrospective, external validation on a dataset containing 1005 febrile Tanzanian children with acute infections. The reference standard, SBI, was established based on rigorous clinical and microbiological criteria. RESULTS: Four prediction rules and five guidelines, including IMCI, could be validated. All examined rules and guidelines had insufficient diagnostic accuracy for ruling-in or ruling-out SBI with positive and negative likelihood ratios ranging from 1.04-1.87 to 0.47-0.92, respectively. IMCI had a sensitivity of 36.7% (95% CI 29.4-44.6%) at a specificity of 70.3% (67.1-73.4%). Rules that use a combination of clinical and laboratory testing had better performance compared to rules and guidelines using only clinical and or laboratory elements. CONCLUSIONS: Currently applied guidelines for managing children with febrile illness have insufficient diagnostic accuracy in detecting children with SBI. Revised clinical algorithms including simple point-of-care tests with improved accuracy for detecting SBI targeting in tropical resource-poor settings are needed. They should undergo careful external validation against clinical outcome before implementation, given the inherent limitations of gold standards for SBI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Técnicas Microbiológicas/normas , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Edad de Inicio , Algoritmos , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fiebre/microbiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tanzanía/epidemiología
14.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 18(8): 798-802, 2019 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31424710

RESUMEN

Cutaneous fungal infections account for millions of office visits per year, yet their varied presentations often lead to misdiagnosis. If dermatology clinics are Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified, direct microscopy with potassium hydroxide or other stains can be used to inexpensively and rapidly diagnose fungal infections. In this survey, we examined dermatologists' perceptions of fungal preparations and CLIA certification to identify barriers that prevent the use of these bedside diagnostics. The response rate was 13% (n=308, based on the number of emails opened). When a cutaneous fungal infection is suspected, 20.94% rarely/never and 19.86% sometimes perform fungal preparations, often because they think clinical diagnosis is adequate or that preparations take too long. 21.32% reported not having CLIA certification, most frequently because the process requires too much work, or they do not know how to apply. Of providers with CLIA certification, over 25% thought it was difficult to obtain. Our results demonstrate that numerous barriers prevent the common use of fungal preparations, including the perception that clinical diagnosis is sufficient and the lack of required CLIA certification. These barriers emphasize the need for additional education about cutaneous fungal infections and use of bedside diagnostics. Additionally, policy-based interventions are necessary to ease the process of CLIA certification.


Asunto(s)
Dermatomicosis/diagnóstico , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Indicadores y Reactivos/química , Adulto , Anciano , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Dermatología/métodos , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Dermatomicosis/microbiología , Dermatomicosis/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Hidróxidos/química , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Microscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Compuestos de Potasio/química , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Piel/microbiología , Piel/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
J AOAC Int ; 102(5): 1617-1623, 2019 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113528

RESUMEN

Background: We deal with interlaboratory experiments (collaborative studies) in which k participating laboratories, selected randomly from a population of laboratories, use samples from one and the same material or matrix. They perform binary microbiological measurements for which the measurement results are either "0" (target microorganisms not detected) or "1" (target microorganisms detected). The performance of such a measurement method is described by its probability of detection (POD) function, i.e., the POD as a function of the contamination of the sample (CFU per gram or CFU per milliliter), or by the level of detection (LODp), i.e., the contamination level of the sample that is detected (measurement result "1") with a specified probability p. Objective: We derive an approximate statistical analysis that is simple enough to be implemented in a spreadsheet application. Methods: Under the assumption of a Poisson distribution of the number of CFU in the samples, we estimate the mean POD function of the laboratories and the SD of the laboratory effect based on a complementary log-log model, a special case of the Generalized Linear Model in the special situation in which the contamination level is known by means other than the POD. The estimates are obtained by maximization of the Laplace approximation of the likelihood function. By simulation, a bias correction factor for the estimate of the SD is obtained. With the estimated POD function, LODs can be estimated. The model can also be used to evaluate the relative LOD of an alternative method with repect to a reference method. Results: The EXCEL program PODLOD-interlab_ver1.xls for this method of statistical analysis can be downloaded from http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/vwl/iso/ehemalige/wilrich. Highlights: A simple approximate statistical method for the estimation of the POD and LOD is derived. The method also allows the estimation of the RLOD of an alternative method with respect to reference method. The method is implemented in an EXCEL program that can be downloaded from http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/vwl/iso/ehemalige/wilrich.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Límite de Detección , Distribución de Poisson
17.
BMC Med ; 17(1): 70, 2019 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922309

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need to understand better the extent and distribution of antimicrobial resistance on a global scale, to inform development of effective interventions. Collation of datasets for meta-analysis, mathematical modelling and temporo-spatial analysis is hampered by the considerable variability in clinical sampling, variable quality in laboratory practice and inconsistencies in antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting. METHODS: The Microbiology Investigation Criteria for Reporting Objectively (MICRO) checklist was developed by an international working group of clinical and laboratory microbiologists, infectious disease physicians, epidemiologists and mathematical modellers. RESULTS: In keeping with the STROBE checklist, but applicable to all study designs, MICRO defines items to be included in reports of studies involving human clinical microbiology data. It provides a concise and comprehensive reference for clinicians, researchers, reviewers and journals working on, critically appraising, and publishing clinical microbiology datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the MICRO checklist will enhance the quality and scientific reporting of clinical microbiology data, increasing data utility and comparability to improve surveillance, grade data quality, facilitate meta-analyses and inform policy and interventions from local to global levels.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico , Exactitud de los Datos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Proyectos de Investigación , Lista de Verificación/normas , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/normas , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Edición/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Informe de Investigación/normas
19.
Mycoses ; 62(4): 368-373, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614600

RESUMEN

Despite the existence of endemic mycoses in Latin America and the Caribbean, in addition to a large population of patients at risk for invasive mycoses, the capability of medical centres to perform a proper diagnosis in mycology has not been studied in the region. Moreover, availability of antifungal drugs in the region is unknown. Here, we report the results of a survey involving 129 centres in 24 countries. Only 9% of centres would have the potential to apply for the minimum standards in mycology, as determined by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology. There is an urgent need to improve diagnostic conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as providing access to safer and more efficacious antifungal drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/provisión & distribución , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Región del Caribe , Humanos , América Latina , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
J Biopharm Stat ; 29(1): 30-55, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29553884

RESUMEN

The detection proportion of a qualitative microbiological test method is the probability to detect a single micro-organism. A general expression for the moment estimator of the detection proportion is provided. It depends on the distribution of the spikes used in a validation study through its moment-generating function. Several forms of spiking experiments are compared on their estimation performance using simulations and assuming a generalized Poisson distribution (GPD) for the spikes. The optimal design, which minimizes the mean squared error of our proposed moment estimator, depends on the dispersion parameter of the GPD. The design that uses just one spiked solution instead of multiple solutions is optimal for Poisson and overdispersed Poisson and it is robust against distributions for the spikes.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bioestadística/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Calibración , Simulación por Computador , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Límite de Detección , Técnicas Microbiológicas/normas , Modelos Estadísticos , Distribución de Poisson , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Investigación Cualitativa , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...