Incremental costs of treating tetanus with intrathecal antitetanus immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost of delivering intrathecal tetanus immunoglobulin compared to an intramuscular option. METHODS: To compare the two interventions, costs were estimated using standard cost methodology. Cost categories were personnel, overhead, consumables, antibiotics to treat infection, gases for respiratory assistance and immunoglobulin. Tetanus patients, aged 12 years or older, who were part of a randomised controlled clinical trial conducted in a referral hospital in Recife, Brazil, were allocated to two groups: a control group (58) and a study group (62). Patients allocated to the control group received 3000 international units (IU) of human immunoglobulin, with preservative, intramuscularly. The study group received the same quantity of immunoglobulin also intramuscularly plus an intrathecal dose of 1000 IU of a human immunoglobulin, free of preservatives, to prevent irritation of the meninges and avoid the need for corticosteroids. Thus, the difference between the two groups was the exclusive use of intrathecal immunoglobulin. The outcome measurements were clinical progression, hospital stay, respiratory assistance and respiratory infection. RESULTS: Delivering intrathecal immunoglobulin to patients saved a total of US$ 60 389, in a 10-day intensive care treatment, by preventing a worsening of their tetanus severity (e.g. from Grade I to Grades II, III, IV). Substantial cost saving was also observed in terms of hospital stay (US$ 173 104). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal treatment of tetanus is cost saving. This intervention deserves consideration by doctors and decision-makers as a mean of saving resources while maintaining high-quality health outcomes.

[Epidemiological and economic impact of tetanus vaccination in Colombian adults]. / Impacto epidemiológico y económico de la vacunación contra el tétanos en adultos de Colombia.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the potential epidemiological and economic impact of vaccinating the over-15 Colombian population against tetanus with a booster dose every 10 years. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis of tetanus vaccination with a booster dose every 10 years was conducted in Colombia and compared with the current strategy (2, 4, 6, 18, and 60 months). Estimates of the burden of disease were based on three official data sources. A Markov model from the perspective of the third party payer was developed. The time horizon was the lifetime of a person. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In Colombia, 30 to 48 cases of tetanus resulting in 9.6 to 10.1 deaths are reported each year. Although booster vaccination for the entire population was cost-effective (the cost per disability-adjusted life year [DALY] avoided was US$ 11,314 in the entire population), gender-based differentiation of the results showed that it would not be cost-effective in women (cost per DALY avoided was US$ 4,903 in men and US$ 22,332 in women). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a tetanus vaccine booster dose every 10 years in a developing country. Use of this measure would be cost-effective in Colombia, especially for men. As a result of the gender-based differences in the results, any decision about its use in women of childbearing age should take current vaccination into account.

Impacto epidemiológico y económico de la vacunación contra el tétanos en adultos de Colombia / Epidemiological and economic impact of tetanus vaccination in Colombian adults

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el potencial impacto epidemiológico y económico de la vacunación antitetánica en la población colombiana mayor de 15 años de edad, con dosis de refuerzo cada 10 años. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un análisis de costo-efectividad de la vacunación con refuerzo cada 10 años contra el tétanos en Colombia, comparándola con la actual estrategia (2, 4, 6, 18 y 60 meses). La carga de enfermedad se estimó con base en tres fuentes oficiales de datos. Se realizó un modelo de Markov desde la perspectiva del tercer pagador. El horizonte temporal fue el tiempo de vida de una persona. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad determinístico y probabilístico. RESULTADOS: En Colombia se notifican anualmente entre 30 y 48 casos de tétanos que ocasionan entre 9,6 y 10,1 muertes. Si bien la vacunación con refuerzo resultó costo-efectiva para toda la población (el costo por año de vida ajustado por discapacidad [AVAD] evitado fue de US$ 11 314 en toda la población), al discriminar los resultados por género no sería costoefectiva en las mujeres (el costo por AVAD evitado en hombres fue de US$ 4 903, y en mujeres de US$ 22 332). CONCLUSIONES: Este es el primer estudio que evalúa la costo- efectividad de una dosis de refuerzo cada 10 años de la vacuna contra el tétanos en un país en desarrollo. La aplicación de esta medida sería costo-efectiva en Colombia, especialmente para los hombres. Las diferencias en los resultados por género obliga a que cualquier decisión de implementación deba tener en cuenta la vacunación actual en mujeres en edad fértil.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the potential epidemiological and economic impact of vaccinating the over-15 Colombian population against tetanus with a booster dose every 10 years. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis of tetanus vaccination with a booster dose every 10 years was conducted in Colombia and compared with the current strategy (2, 4, 6, 18, and 60 months). Estimates of the burden of disease were based on three official data sources. A Markov model from the perspective of the third party payer was developed. The time horizon was the lifetime of a person. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In Colombia, 30 to 48 cases of tetanus resulting in 9.6 to 10.1 deaths are reported each year. Although booster vaccination for the entire population was cost-effective (the cost per disability-adjusted life year [DALY] avoided was US$ 11,314 in the entire population), gender-based differentiation of the results showed that it would not be cost-effective in women (cost per DALY avoided was US$ 4,903 in men and US$ 22,332 in women). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a tetanus vaccine booster dose every 10 years in a developing country. Use of this measure would be cost-effective in Colombia, especially for men. As a result of the gender-based differences in the results, any decision about its use in women of childbearing age should take current vaccination into account.