The Road To Value Can't Be Paved With A Broken Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

Value-based payment has been promoted for increasing quality, controlling spending, and improving patient and practitioner experience. Meanwhile, needed reforms to fee-for-service payment (the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule) have been ignored as policy makers seek to move payment toward alternatives, even though the fee schedule is an intrinsic part of Alternative Payment Models. In this article, we show how value-based payment and the fee schedule should be viewed as complementary, rather than as separate silos. We trace the origins of embedded flaws in the fee schedule that must be fixed if value-based payment is to succeed. These include payment distortions that directly compromise value by overpaying for certain procedures and imaging services while underpaying for services that add value for beneficiaries. We also show how the fee schedule can accommodate bundled payments and population-based payments that are central to Alternative Payment Models. We draw two conclusions. First, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should correct misvalued services and establish a hybrid payment for primary care that blends fee-for-service and population-based payment. Second, Congress should alter the thirty-five-year-old statutory basis for setting Medicare fees to allow CMS to explicitly consider policy priorities such as workforce shortages in refining fee levels.

The work relative value estimation assessment in China: an empirical research for common surgical procedures.

Objectives: China's National Health Service Items Standard (NHSIS) establishes a relative value system and plays an important role in pricing. However, there are few empirical evaluations of the objectivity of the NHSIS-estimated relative value. Methods: This paper presents a comparison between physician work relative value units (wRVUs) estimates for 70 common surgical procedures from NHSIS and those from the U.S. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). We defined the ratio of the wRVUs for sample procedures to the benchmark procedure (inguinal hernia repair) as a standardized relative value unit (SRVU), which was used to standardize the data for both schedules. We examined the variances in the ranking and quantification of SRVUs across specialties and procedures, as well as how SRVUs impact procedure reimbursement prices between the two schedules. Results: There was no systematic difference between MHSIS-estimated SRVUs and MPFS-estimated, but the dispersion of MPFS-estimated SRVU was greater than that of MHSIS-estimated, and the discrepancies increased with surgical risk and technical complexity. The discrepancies of SRVUs were significant in cardiothoracic procedures. Additionally, whether SRVUs were based on MPFS or MHSIS, there was a positive association between them and payment prices. However, in terms of the impact of SRVUs on payment pricing, the NHSIS system was lower than the MPFS system. Conclusion: China has made incremental progress in estimating the relative value of healthcare services, but there are shortcomings in valuation methods and their impact on pricing. The modular assessment method should be considered as a component to optimize reform.

Unveiling the Hidden Discrepancies Between Medicare Physician Reimbursement Rates and Inflation Across Different Surgical Specialties.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the trends of Medicare physician reimbursement from 2011 to 2021 and compare the rates across different surgical specialties. BACKGROUND: Knowledge of Medicare is essential because of its significant contribution in physician reimbursements. Previous studies across surgical specialties have demonstrated that Medicare, despite keeping up with inflation in some areas, has remained flat when accounting for physician reimbursement. STUDY DESIGN: The Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data for the calendar year 2021 were queried to extract the top 50% of Current Procedural Terminology codes based on case volume. The Physician Fee Schedule look-up tool was accessed, and the physician reimbursement fee was abstracted. Weighted mean reimbursement was adjusted for inflation. Growth rate and compound annual growth rate were calculated. Projection of future inflation and reimbursement rates were also calculated using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. RESULTS: After adjusting for inflation, the weighted mean reimbursement across surgical specialties decreased by -22.5%. The largest reimbursement decrease was within the field of general surgery (-33.3%), followed by otolaryngology (-31.5%), vascular surgery (-23.3%), and plastic surgery (-22.8%). There was a significant decrease in median case volume across all specialties between 2011 and 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, when adjusted for inflation, over the study period, there has been a consistent decrease in reimbursement for all specialties analyzed. Awareness of the current downward trends in Medicare physician reimbursement should be a priority for all surgeons, as means of advocating for compensation and to maintain surgical care feasible and accessible to all patients.

Declining Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Physician Fees: An Unsustainable Trend in Hip Arthroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Although hip arthroscopy continues to be one of the most used arthroscopic procedures, no focused, comprehensive evaluation of reimbursement trends has been conducted. The purpose of this study was to analyze the temporal Medicare reimbursement trends for hip arthroscopy procedures. METHODS: From 2011 to 2021, the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to hip arthroscopy (29860 to 29863, 29914 to 29916). All monetary data were adjusted to 2021 US dollars. The compound annual growth rate and total percentage change were calculated. Mann-Kendall trend tests were used to evaluate the reimbursement trends. RESULTS: Based on the unadjusted values, a significant increase in physician fee was observed from 2011 to 2021 for CPT codes 29861 (removal of loose or foreign bodies; % change: 3.49, P = 0.03) and 29862 (chondroplasty, abrasion arthroplasty, labral resection; % change: 3.19, P = 0.03). The remaining CPT codes experienced no notable changes in reimbursement based on the unadjusted values. After adjusting for inflation, all seven of the hip arthroscopy CPT codes were observed to experience a notable decline in Medicare reimbursement. Hip arthroscopy with acetabuloplasty (CPT: 29915) and labral repair (CPT: 29916) exhibited the greatest reduction in reimbursement with a decrease in physician fee of 24.69% ( P < 0.001) and 24.64% ( P < 0.001), respectively, over the study period. DISCUSSION: Medicare reimbursement for all seven of the commonly used hip arthroscopy services did not keep up with inflation, demonstrating marked reductions from 2011 to 2021. Specifically, the inflation-adjusted reimbursements decreased between 19.23% and 24.69% between 2011 and 2021.

Analysis of 10-year trends in Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments in surgery.

BACKGROUND: Medicare expenditures have steadily increased over the decades, and yet Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments for individual services have declined. We examine trends in Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments for office visits, inpatient visits, and surgical procedures. METHODS: The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was queried for payment data for office visits, inpatient visits, and surgical procedures between 2013 and 2023. All data were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Trends in payments were calculated for 5 common procedures in each surgical specialty. Trends in aggregate national health expenditures were compared to Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments for physician services from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS: The Consumer Price Index increased by 29.3% from 2013 to 2023. Inflation-adjusted per-visit Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments decreased by 12.2% for outpatient office visits, 19.1% for inpatient visits, and 22.8% for surgical procedures from 2013 to 2023. This varied by surgical specialty: vascular (-25.8%), endocrine (-22.0%), general surgery (-27.0%), thoracic (-19.2%), surgical oncology (-22.1%), breast (-22.4%), urology (-2.2%), neurosurgery (-22.8%), obstetrics/gynecology (-19.9%), and orthopedics (-24.7%). Adjusted for inflation, national health expenditures increased by 33.9% for physician services from 2013 to 2021. In comparison, Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments over the same time period 2013 to 2021 increased by 1.3% for outpatient office visits but decreased by 10.6% for inpatient visits and 9.8% for surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Controlling rising national health expenditures is important and necessary, but 10 years of declining Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments on a per-procedure basis in surgery would suggest that this strategy alone may not achieve those goals and could ultimately threaten access to quality surgical care. Surgeons must advocate for permanent payment reforms.

A Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Analysis of Reimbursement Trends in Laryngology from 2000 to 2021.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to characterize Medicare reimbursement trends for laryngology procedures over the last two decades. METHODS: This analysis used CMS' Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Look-Up Tool to determine the reimbursement rate of 48 common laryngology procedures, which were divided into four groups based on their practice setting and clinical use: office-based, airway, voice disorders, and dysphagia. The PFS reports the physician service reimbursement for "facilities" and global reimbursement for "non-facilities". The annual reimbursement rate for each procedure was averaged across all localities and adjusted for inflation. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of each procedure's reimbursement was determined, and a weighted average of the CAGR for each group of procedures was calculated using each procedure's 2020 Medicare Part B utilization. RESULTS: Reimbursement for laryngology procedure (CPT) codes has declined over the last two decades. In facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office-based procedures was -2.0%, for airway procedures was -2.2%, for voice disorders procedures was -1.4%, and for dysphagia procedures was -1.7%. In non-facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office-based procedures was -0.9%. The procedures in the other procedure groups did not have a corresponding non-facility reimbursement rate. CONCLUSION: Like other otolaryngology subspecialties, inflation-adjusted reimbursements for common laryngology procedures have decreased substantially over the past two decades. Because of the large number of physician participants and patient enrollees in the Medicare programs, increased awareness and further research into the implications of these trends on patient care is necessary to ensure quality in the delivery of laryngology care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:247-256, 2024.

Hospital payment systems and physician reimbursement: A primer for radiology residents.

Prior to practicing independently, radiology trainees spend considerable time and energy to learn and understand the practice of radiology. However, upon graduation trainees are often deficient in understanding the business of hospitals and the structure of reimbursement. Specifically, the workflow of relative value units (RVUs) and its impact on practice of radiology after completing training. In this manuscript, we provide a resource for trainees to understand the workflow of physician reimbursement. This article includes information on the mixed model healthcare structure of the United States and two government programs that influence reimbursement: Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) programs. Furthermore, we explain the method by which the Center of Medicare and Medicate Service's (CMS) reimburses physicians via the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) using the Resource Based Relative Value Scale. Understanding the structure of these payments along with the challenges and current landscape of radiology reimbursement will help new radiologists prior to seeking employment where reimbursements are integral to contract expectations.

Update on Dermatology Reimbursement in 2024.

This article provides a discussion of the proposed Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS) published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in July 2023, which will negatively impact dermatology practices starting in 2024. An overview of physician payment policy, legislative updates affecting dermatology, and the overall outlook for 2024 for dermatologists also is presented.

The impact of changes in a physician fee schedule on medical expenditures, fees, and volume of services. Evidence from a national fee schedule reform in Australia.

We examine the impact of changes to a national physician fee schedule on total medical expenditures, the volume of services, and fees charged. In our context, changes to the fee schedule were designed to promote value-based health care, and so included different types of changes to subsidised medical services, including changes to fees. Using claims data from a sample of doctors linked to a physician survey, we use difference-in-difference methods with a staggered adoption design to compare medical services which were affected with those which were not. We show that medical expenditures and the volume of affected services fell, though there is uncertainty about the magnitude of the fall. For GPs, we find evidence of increases in expenditures and fees and an increase in fees for some services provided by specialists.

Budget Neutrality and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Reimbursement Trends for Radiologists, 2005 to 2021.

PURPOSE: The Medicare program, by law, must remain budget neutral. Increases in volume or relative value units (RVUs) for individual services necessitate declines in either the conversion factor or assigned RVUs for other services for budget neutrality. This study aimed to assess the contribution of budget neutrality on reimbursement trends per Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary for services provided by radiologists. METHODS: The study used aggregated 100% of Medicare Part B claims from 2005 to 2021. We computed the percentage change in reimbursement per beneficiary, actual and inflation adjusted, to radiologists. These trends were then adjusted by separately holding constant RVUs per beneficiary and the conversion factor to demonstrate the impact of budget neutrality. RESULTS: Unadjusted reimbursement to radiologists per beneficiary increased 4.2% between 2005 and 2021, but when adjusted for inflation, it declined 24.9%. Over this period, the conversion factor declined 7.9%. Without this decline, the reimbursement per beneficiary would have been 9 percentage points higher in 2021 compared with actual. RVUs per beneficiary performed by radiologists increased 13.1%. Keeping RVUs per beneficiary at 2005 levels, reimbursement per beneficiary would have been 12.1 percentage points lower than observed in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Given budget neutrality, a substantial decline has occurred in inflation-adjusted reimbursement to radiologists per Medicare beneficiary. Decreases due to both inflation and the decline in conversion factor are only partially offset by increased RVUs per beneficiary, meaning more services per patient with less overall pay, an equation likely to heighten access challenges for Medicare beneficiaries and shortages of radiologists.

Current Reimbursement Landscape of Artificial Intelligence.

One of the biggest hurdles to widespread adoption of new procedures and technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms is payment and coverage policy. Noninvasive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve is one AI imaging algorithm that will successfully achieve reimbursement through multiple pathways of CMS payment mechanisms in 2024. CMS is the largest provider of health care in the United States. Understanding how this AI algorithm is paid through the different fee schedules will help to understand the challenges CMS has in paying for new services and innovation in the United States.

Relative billing complexity of in-person versus telehealth outpatient encounters.

RATIONALE: Video visits became more widely available during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the ongoing role and value of video visits in care delivery and how these may have changed over time are not well understood. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Compare the relative complexity of in-person versus video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic and describe the complexity of video visits over time. METHODS: We used billing data for in-person and video revisits from non-behavioural health specialities with the most video visit utilisation (≥50th percentile) at a large, urban, public healthcare system from 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2022. We used current procedural terminology (CPT) codes as a proxy for information gathering and decision-making complexity and time spent on an encounter. We compared the distribution of CPT codes 99211-99215 between in-person and video visits using Fisher's exact tests. We used Spearman correlation to test for trends between proportions of CPT codes over time for video visits. RESULTS: Ten specialities (adult primary care, paediatrics, adult dermatology, bariatric surgery, paediatric endocrinology, obstetrics and gynaecologist, adult haematology/oncology, paediatric allergy/immunology, paediatric gastroenterology, and paediatric pulmonology) met inclusion criteria. For each speciality, proportions of each CPT code for in-person visits and for video visits varied significantly, and patterns of variation differed by speciality. For example, in adult primary care, video visits had smaller proportions of moderate/high complexity visits (99214 and 99215) and greater proportions of lower complexity visits (99211-99213) compared with in-person visits (p < 0.001), but in paediatric endocrinology, the opposite was seen (p < 0.001). Trends in CPT codes over time for video visits in each speciality were also mixed. CONCLUSION: In-person and video visits had differing proportions of complexity codes (typically skewing towards lower complexity for video visits). The complexity of video visits changed over time in many specialities. Observed patterns for both phenomena varied by speciality.

The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Unethical Behavior.

This Viewpoint discusses the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and its flaws, including how they might be remedied by severing CMS dependence on Relative Value Update Committee estimates of time and intensity.

Políticas públicas de medicamentos e a relação de medicamentos essenciais / Public policies on medicines and the list of essential medicines / Las políticas públicas sobre medicamentos y la lista de medicamentos esenciales

Através da edição da Norma Operacional de Assistência à Saúde realizada em 2001 e da publicação do Pacto pela Saúde realizado em 2006 o processo de acesso à saúde, ganhou maior ênfase no quesito de inovações e melhorias do sistema de saúde. A assistência farmacêutica sobreveio como parte fundamental nos serviços e programas de saúde. Neste sentido, o objetivo do presente estudo foi de expor as principais políticas públicas acerca da temática de medicamentos essenciais. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão integrativa de literatura, tendo como base de dados o Ministério da Saúde, as Resoluções da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, artigos científicos e as publicações da Relação Nacional de Medicamentos (RENAME). No ano de 1998 através da portaria nº 3.916, de 30 de outubro 1998, apresenta-se a população a terminologia de Políticas públicas e, como resposta às diretrizes resultantes desta política, no presente artigo teremos ênfase na RENAME, criada através da portaria nº 3.047, de 28 de novembro de 2019, a qual atende aos princípios básicos e fundamentais do Sistema Único de Saúde: universalidade, equidade e a integralidade, para atender aos tratamentos das diversas doenças e agravos que acometem a população brasileira. Sendo assim, conclui- se que não se trata apenas de políticas públicas, e sim de manter o direito do cidadão estabelecidos pela Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, para que o paciente consiga adquirir a medicação adequada e na quantidade necessária, permitindo aos profissionais alcançar mais aproveitamento no gerenciamento do ciclo da assistência farmacêutica.

Through the edition of the Operational Norm for Health Care carried out in 2001 and the publication of the Pact for Health carried out in 2006, the process of access to health gained greater emphasis on the issue of innovations and improvements in the health system. Pharmaceutical assistance emerged as a fundamental part of health services and programs. In this sense, the objective of the present study was to expose the main public policies on the subject of essential medicines. Therefore, an integrative literature review was carried out, using the Ministry of Health, the National Health Surveillance Agency's Resolutions, scientific articles and the publications of the National Medicines List (RENAME) as a database. In 1998, through ordinance nº 3.916, of October 30, 1998, the public policy terminology is presented to the population and, in response to the guidelines resulting from this policy, in this article we will emphasize RENAME, created through ordinance nº 3.047 , of November 28, 2019, which meets the basic and fundamental principles of the Unified Health System: universality, equity and integrality, to meet the treatments of the various diseases and conditions that affect the Brazilian population. Therefore, it is concluded that it is not just about public policies, but about maintaining the right of the citizen established by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, so that the patient can acquire the appropriate medication and in the necessary quantity, allowing professionals to achieve more use in the management of the pharmaceutical care cycle.

A través de la edición de la Norma Operativa de Atención a la Salud realizada en 2001 y de la publicación del Pacto por la Salud realizada en 2006, el proceso de acceso a la salud ganó mayor énfasis en el tema de innovaciones y mejoras en el sistema de salud. La asistencia farmacéutica surgió como parte fundamental de los servicios y programas de salud. En este sentido, el objetivo del presente estudio fue exponer las principales políticas públicas sobre el tema de los medicamentos esenciales. Para ello, se realizó una revisión bibliográfica integradora, utilizando como base de datos el Ministerio de Salud, las Resoluciones de la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria, artículos científicos y las publicaciones de la Lista Nacional de Medicamentos (RENAME). En 1998, a través de la ordenanza nº 3.916, de 30 de octubre de 1998, se presenta a la población la política pública de terminología y, en respuesta a las directrices resultantes de esta política, en este artículo haremos hincapié en el RENAME, creado a través de la ordenanza nº 3.047, de 28 de noviembre de 2019, que cumple con los principios básicos y fundamentales del Sistema Único de Salud: universalidad, equidad e integralidad, para atender los tratamientos de las diversas enfermedades y afecciones que afectan a la población brasileña. Por lo tanto, se concluye que no se trata sólo de políticas públicas, sino de mantener el derecho del ciudadano establecido por la Constitución de la República Federativa de Brasil, para que el paciente pueda adquirir el medicamento adecuado y en la cantidad necesaria, permitiendo que los profesionales logren un mayor aprovechamiento en la gestión del ciclo de atención farmacéutica.

[Differences in Billing Patterns Between GPs and Pediatricians Using Early Diagnostics in Children and Adolescents as an Example: Analysis of Nationwide Data from Statutory Health Insurance Physicians]. / Kompensation von Leistungen zwischen Hausärzten und Kinder- und Jugendmedizinern am Beispiel der Früherkennungsuntersuchungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen ­ Analyse von bundesweiten KBV-Daten.

BACKGROUND: Despite a 13.1% increase in the number of pediatricians between 2011 - 2020, the capacity of pediatric care has largely stagnated. This is due to increasing flexibility in working hours and a declining willingness of doctors to establish practices. In addition, there is an imbalance in the distribution of pediatric medical care capacities. While metropolitan areas are often characterized by oversupply, there is an increasing shortage of pediatricians, especially in rural areas. As a result, general practitioners in rural areas are increasingly taking over part of pediatric care. We quantify this compensation effect using the example of examinations of general health and normal child development (U1-U9). METHODS: Basis of the analysis was the Doctors' Fee Scale within the Statutory Health Insurance Scheme (Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab, EBM) from 2015 (4th quarter). Nationwide data from the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) for general practitioners and pediatricians from 2015 was evaluated. In the first step, the EBM was used to determine the potential overlap of services between the two groups of doctors. The actual compensation between the groups was quantified using general health and normal child development as an example. RESULTS: In section 1.7.1 (early detection of diseases in children) of the EBM, there is a list of 16 options for services that can be billed (fee schedule positions, GOP) by general practitioners and pediatricians. This particularly includes child examinations U1 to U9. The analysis of the national data of the KBV for the early detection of diseases in children showed significant differences between rural and urban regions in the billing procedure. Nationwide, general practitioners billed 6.6% of the services in the area of early detection of diseases in children in 2015. In rural regions this share was 23% compared to 3.6% in urban regions. The analysis of the nationwide data showed that the proportion of services billed by general practitioners was higher in rural regions than in urban regions. CONCLUSION: The EBM allows billing of services by both general practitioners and pediatricians, especially in the area of general GOP across all medical groups. The national billing data of the KBV shows that general practitioners in rural regions bill more services from the corresponding sections than in urban regions.

Expected changes in physician outpatient interventional practices as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 and recent changes in Medicare physician fee schedule.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the economic and practice effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and decreased Medicare physician payments on outpatient vascular interventional procedures. METHODS: A 21-point survey was constructed and sent electronically to the physician members of the Outpatient Endovascular and Interventional Society and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society. The survey responses were converted to a Likert scale and statistical analyses performed to examine the associations between the response variables and the characteristics and practice patterns of the physician respondents. RESULTS: A total of 165 physicians responded to the survey, of whom 33% were vascular surgeons, 18% were radiologists, and 15% were general surgeons. For slightly more than one half (55%), their interventional practice was limited to the office setting, with the remainder also performing procedures in an office-based laboratory (OBL), ambulatory surgery center (ASC), or hospital. Almost all respondents had performed superficial venous interventions, with slightly more than one third also performing either deep venous procedures and/or peripheral arterial interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic had affected 98% of the practices, with a staff shortage reported by 63%. The most-established physicians, those with the longest interval since training completion, were the least likely to have experienced staff shortages. Almost all (94%) the respondents expected that the recent Medicare payment changes will have a negative effect on their practice. Physicians with only an office-based practice were less likely to add a physician associate compared with those with an OBL (P = .036). More than one quarter reported that it was likely they would close or sell their interventional practice in the next 2 years and 43% reported they were planning to retire early. The anticipated ameliorative responses to the decreased Medicare physician payments included adding wound care (24%) or other clinical services (36%) to their practices, with the alternatives considered more by younger physicians (P = .002) and nonsurgeons (P = .047). Only 10% expected to convert their practices to an ASC or hybrid ASC/OBL (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The emotional and economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreased Medicare physician reimbursement rates for vascular outpatient interventionalists have been significant. Even greater challenges for the financial viability of office practices and OBLs can be expected in the near future if additional further planned cuts are put into effect.

Reimbursement Trends in Pediatric Otolaryngology From 2000 to 2020: A CMS Physician Fee Schedule Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the most billed procedures at a single institution from 2000 to 2020 within pediatric otolaryngology. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: United States. METHODS: The most billed surgical and in-office procedures in pediatric otolaryngology at our institution were identified in the Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to extract reimbursement data for each CPT code (Current Procedural Terminology). Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2020 US dollars per the changes to the consumer price index. Mean annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated by the adjusted values for all included procedures (N = 25). RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, without adjusting for inflation, reimbursement for the most billed procedures increased by 10.9%, while the allocated relative value unit per procedure increased by 15.4%. However, when adjusted for inflation, reimbursement for these procedures decreased by 27.5% over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings identify a downward trend in reimbursement for the most billed procedures in pediatric otolaryngology at our institution. Given the low predominance of pediatric otolaryngology codes within Medicare reimbursement, these codes are rarely reviewed for accurate revaluation. It is imperative that our professional society remain active and engaged within this process to ensure quality delivery of care to our patients.