Oxycodone: A Current Perspective on Its Pharmacology, Abuse, and Pharmacotherapeutic Developments.

Oxycodone, a semisynthetic derivative of naturally occurring thebaine, an opioid alkaloid, has been available for more than 100 years. Although thebaine cannot be used therapeutically due to the occurrence of convulsions at higher doses, it has been converted to a number of other widely used compounds that include naloxone, naltrexone, buprenorphine, and oxycodone. Despite the early identification of oxycodone, it was not until the 1990s that clinical studies began to explore its analgesic efficacy. These studies were followed by the pursuit of several preclinical studies to examine the analgesic effects and abuse liability of oxycodone in laboratory animals and the subjective effects in human volunteers. For a number of years oxycodone was at the forefront of the opioid crisis, playing a significant role in contributing to opioid misuse and abuse, with suggestions that it led to transitioning to other opioids. Several concerns were expressed as early as the 1940s that oxycodone had significant abuse potential similar to heroin and morphine. Both animal and human abuse liability studies have confirmed, and in some cases amplified, these early warnings. Despite sharing a similar structure with morphine and pharmacological actions also mediated by the µ-opioid receptor, there are several differences in the pharmacology and neurobiology of oxycodone. The data that have emerged from the many efforts to analyze the pharmacological and molecular mechanism of oxycodone have generated considerable insight into its many actions, reviewed here, which, in turn, have provided new information on opioid receptor pharmacology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Oxycodone, a µ-opioid receptor agonist, was synthesized in 1916 and introduced into clinical use in Germany in 1917. It has been studied extensively as a therapeutic analgesic for acute and chronic neuropathic pain as an alternative to morphine. Oxycodone emerged as a drug with widespread abuse. This article brings together an integrated, detailed review of the pharmacology of oxycodone, preclinical and clinical studies of pain and abuse, and recent advances to identify potential opioid analgesics without abuse liability.

Discovery of an M-Substituted N-Cyclopropylmethyl-7α-phenyl-6,14-endoethanotetrahydronorthebaine as a Selective, Potent, and Orally Active κ-Opioid Receptor Agonist with an Improved Central Nervous System Safety Profile.

The search for selective kappa opioid receptor (κOR) agonists with an improved safety profile is an area of interest in opioid research. In this work, a series of m-substituted analogs were designed, synthesized, and assayed, resulting in the identification of compound 6c (SLL-1206) as a κOR agonist with single-digit nanomolar activities. The subtype selectivity of compound 6c appeared to be a consequence of an enormous decrease in the affinity for µOR and δOR, rather than a significant increase in the affinity for κOR, which was not the case for SLL-039, another selective and potent κOR agonist identified in our previous work. Besides reduced central nervous system effects, SLL-1206 exhibited substantially improved physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties compared with SLL-039, with increases of over 20-fold in aqueous solubility and approximately 40-fold in oral bioavailability in rats.

Urinary excretion study following consumption of various poppy seed products and investigation of the new potential street heroin marker ATM4G.

Discrimination between street heroin consumption and poppy seed ingestion represents a major toxicological challenge in daily routine work. Several difficulties associated with conventional street heroin markers originate from their versatile occurrence in various poppy seed products and medications, respectively, as well as to small windows of detection. A novel opportunity to overcome these hindrances is represented by the new potential street heroin marker acetylated-thebaine-4-metabolite glucuronide (ATM4G), originating from thebaine during street heroin synthesis followed by metabolic reactions after administration. In this study, urine samples after consumption of different German poppy seed products and urine samples from subjects with suspicion of preceding heroin consumption were tested for ATM4G, 6-AC (6-acetylcodeine), papaverine, noscapine, 6-MAM (6-monoacetylmorphine), morphine, and codeine. Neither 6-AC and 6-MAM nor ATM4G but morphine and codeine could be detected in urine samples following poppy seed ingestion. As well, neither papaverine nor noscapine could be observed even after consumption of poppy seeds containing up to 37 µg noscapine and up to 9.8 µg papaverine, respectively. Concerning the urine samples with suspicion of preceding heroin consumption, ATM4G could be detected in 9 of 43 cases. By contrast, evidence of 6-AC and 6-MAM, respectively, could only be seen in 7 urine samples. In conclusion, ATM4G should be measured additionally in cases requiring discrimination of street heroin consumption from poppy seed intake. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Pharmacological mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive and tolerance effects of the 6,14-bridged oripavine compound 030418.

AIM: To investigate possible pharmacological mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effect of and tolerance to N-methyl-7α-[(R)-1-hydroxy-1-methyl-3-(thien-3-yl)-propyl]-6,14-endo-ethanotetrahydronororipavine (030418), a derivative of thienorphine. METHODS: The binding affinity and efficacy of 030418 were determined using receptor binding and guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPγS) assays in CHO-µ, CHO-κ, CHO-δ, and CHO-ORL1 cell membranes. The analgesic activity of and tolerance to 030418 were evaluated in thermal nociceptive tests in mice. The effects of 030418 on opioid receptors were further investigated using in vivo pharmacological antagonist blockade and in vitro tissue preparations. RESULTS: The compound 030418 displayed high binding affinity to all subtypes of opioid receptors with K(i) values in the nanomolar range. In [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay, the maximal stimulation of 030418 to µ-, κ-, δ-receptors and the ORL1 receptor was 89%, 86%, 67% and 91%, respectively. In hot-plate test, the antinociceptive effect of 030418 was more potent and longer than morphine. The nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone could completely block 030418-induced antinociception, while both the µ-opioid receptor antagonist ß-FNA and the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI attenuated 030418-induced antinociception. In contrast, the ORL1 receptor antagonist J-113397 enhanced the antinociceptive effect of 030418. Additionally, chronic treatment with 030418 resulted in a dramatic development of tolerance that could not be effectively prevented by J-113397. In guinea pig ileum preparation, the existing action of 030418 could be removed with difficulty after prolonged washing. CONCLUSION: The compound 030418 is a novel agonist of opioid receptors with high efficiency, long-lasting effect and liability to tolerance, which may be closely correlated with the methyl group at the N(17) position and the high hydrophobicity of the C(7)-thiophene group in its chemical structure.

Effect of the centrally acting antitussives on ascites tumor cells.

Dextromethorphan, dimemorfan, dihydrocodeine and oxymethebanol, centrally acting antitussives, were examined for their effect on Ehrlich carcinoma cells and sarcoma-180 cells in vitro or in vivo. The tumor cells were suspended in Hanks balanced salt solution (pH 7.4) supplemented with 2% bovine albumin, and they were incubated with and without 1 mM drugs at 37 degrees C for 120 min. The incubation of the tumor cells with dextromethorphan or dimemorfan resulted in a decrease in the proportion of the viable cells (less than 25% after 120 min). However, no significant change was observed in the proportion of the viable tumor cells during the incubation with and without the other drugs (80-83% after 120 min). In addition, mice given the tumor cells i.p. were injected intraperitoneally with drugs (20-80 mg/kg/day) once daily for 5 successive days, and their survival time was observed. There was a slight difference in the survival time between mice treated with and without dextromethorphan or dimemorfan. However, a significant difference was found in the survival time between mice treated with and without dextromethorphan when mice given Ehrlich carcinoma cells were injected with the drug (40 mg/kg/time) twice a day for 5 days (about 18 days and 29 days). These results indicate that dextromethorphan and dimemorfan are cytotoxic to the tumor cells in vitro and in vivo.

Double-blind evaluation of buprenorphine hydrochloride for post-operative pain.

In a double-blind, random assignment study of four groups of 40 patients, relief of severe pain with buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg was evaluated and compared with morphine sulphate 5 or 10 mg. Evaluations included pain intensity, pain relief, sedation and other effects for up to 12 hours after drug administration, following recovery of wakefulness from anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery. Analyses of five parameters showed that the four groups were statistically comparable and that buprenorphine hydrochloride is at least 50 times more potent than morphine sulphate and has a substantially longer duration of analgesic action. Further clinical evaluation is, therefore, recommended.

Buprenorphine hydrochloride: determination of analgesic potency.

An open evaluation of relief from severe pain following major abdominal operations was carried out on at least ten patients, who had given written consent, with 0.1 to 0.4 mg doses of buprenorphine hydrochloride administered intramuscularly. Statistical analysis of the data showed that 0.3 mg of this compound provided quite satisfactory relief from pain for up to six hours. Seven more consenting patients were given buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.5 to 0.6 mg, but they did not receive much greater or longer pain relief than those receiving 0.3 to 0.4 mg. However, the latter patients were younger and heavier. It was concluded that buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.2 to 0.4 mg provided relief of severe pain probably as well as is observed with morphine 10 mg for the average-size patient, but the duration of pain relief with the new compound is substantially longer than with other strong analgesics previously tested. The only common side effect noted was drowsiness, which was observed during the analgesic action of the compound. No appreciable alterations were seen in the respiration, pulse rate and blood pressure. On the basis of these tests, buprenorphine hydrochloride appears to be a satisfactory analgesic for severe postoperative pain, and it deserves extensive study.