Self-perceived functioning and disability after randomized conventional and electromechanically-assisted gait training in subacute stroke: A 6 months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Few previous studies have assessed self-perceived functioning, disability and recovery after electromechanically-assisted gait training (EAGT). OBJECTIVE: To compare self-perceived functioning, disability and recovery after EAGT and after conventional gait training in the subacute stage after stroke, using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), and factors associated with self-perceived recovery, assessed at 6 months after stroke. METHODS: Patients were randomized into two groups performing a 4-week intervention period of incorporated EAGT using the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) or conventional physiotherapy only. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in self-perceived strength, ADL, mobility, participation and percentage of recovery between intervention groups (p > 0.05). Self-perceived mobility was associated with improvements in objectively assessed walking speed/endurance and balance (R2 0.717, p = 0.002), and self-perceived recovery with self-perceived activities of daily living (ADL) ability (R2 0.34, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that EAGT and conventional gait training in the subacute stage after stroke have no differential impact on self-perceived functioning, disability and recovery at 6 months after stroke. Further, the study highlights the importance of interventions targeting ADL and self-care independence during stroke rehabilitation to enhance self-perceived recovery and clinical aspects to be targeted to enhance perceived mobility.

[External validity of pain-linked functional interference: are we measuring what we want to measure?]. / Externe Validität der schmerzbedingten Funktionsbeeinträchtigung : Messen wir, was wir messen wollen?

BACKGROUND: Measurement of functional interference (FI) of pain is crucial for postoperative pain management. This study examined the external validity of three FI items (respiration, mobilization and sleep) within the framework of the German quality improvement in postoperative pain management (QUIPS) project. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 380 patients undergoing trauma/orthopedic or abdominal surgery were asked to complete the QUIPS outcome questionnaire. Criteria to determine external validity of FI assessment were tolerance to a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine for FI with mobilization, the pre-postoperative difference of peak flow for FI with respiration and sleep quality measured with actigraphy for FI with sleep. RESULTS: The QUIPS outcome questionnaire achieved satisfactory reliability (r(tt) =0 .783-0.954, internal consistency 0.597-0.941). The three FI items under examination achieved a significant correlation (r =0 .407-0.469) with the external criteria.

Exercise adherence in patients with trismus due to head and neck oncology: a qualitative study into the use of the Therabite.

Trismus is a common problem after treatment of head and neck cancer. The Therabite is an effective treatment for trismus. To explore the factors that may influence Therabite exercise adherence, how these interrelate and to provide aims for interventions to increase adherence, the authors conducted a multi-centre, formal-evaluative qualitative retrospective study. 21 patients treated for head-neck cancer were interviewed in semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Internal motivation to exercise, the perceived effect, self-discipline and having a clear exercise goal influenced Therabite exercise adherence positively. Perceiving no effect, limitation in Therabite opening range and reaching the exercise goal or a plateau in mouth opening were negative influences. Pain, anxiety and the physiotherapist could influence adherence both positively and negatively. Based on the results, a model for Therabite exercise adherence was proposed. It is important to signal and assess the factors negatively influencing Therabite adherence, specifically before there is a perceived effect. Research is needed to examine why some patients do not achieve results despite high exercise adherence, to identify effective exercise regimens and to assess proposed interventions aimed to increase Therabite exercise adherence.

Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold.

Motor training with the upper limb affected by stroke partially reverses the loss of cortical representation after lesion and has been proposed to increase spontaneous arm use. Moreover, repeated attempts to use the affected hand in daily activities create a form of practice that can potentially lead to further improvement in motor performance. We thus hypothesized that if motor retraining after stroke increases spontaneous arm use sufficiently, then the patient will enter a virtuous circle in which spontaneous arm use and motor performance reinforce each other. In contrast, if the dose of therapy is not sufficient to bring spontaneous use above threshold, then performance will not increase and the patient will further develop compensatory strategies with the less affected hand. To refine this hypothesis, we developed a computational model of bilateral hand use in arm reaching to study the interactions between adaptive decision making and motor relearning after motor cortex lesion. The model contains a left and a right motor cortex, each controlling the opposite arm, and a single action choice module. The action choice module learns, via reinforcement learning, the value of using each arm for reaching in specific directions. Each motor cortex uses a neural population code to specify the initial direction along which the contralateral hand moves towards a target. The motor cortex learns to minimize directional errors and to maximize neuronal activity for each movement. The derived learning rule accounts for the reversal of the loss of cortical representation after rehabilitation and the increase of this loss after stroke with insufficient rehabilitation. Further, our model exhibits nonlinear and bistable behavior: if natural recovery, motor training, or both, brings performance above a certain threshold, then training can be stopped, as the repeated spontaneous arm use provides a form of motor learning that further bootstraps performance and spontaneous use. Below this threshold, motor training is "in vain": there is little spontaneous arm use after training, the model exhibits learned nonuse, and compensatory movements with the less affected hand are reinforced. By exploring the nonlinear dynamics of stroke recovery using a biologically plausible neural model that accounts for reversal of the loss of motor cortex representation following rehabilitation or the lack thereof, respectively, we can explain previously hard to reconcile data on spontaneous arm use in stroke recovery. Further, our threshold prediction could be tested with an adaptive train-wait-train paradigm: if spontaneous arm use has increased in the "wait" period, then the threshold has been reached, and rehabilitation can be stopped. If spontaneous arm use is still low or has decreased, then another bout of rehabilitation is to be provided.

Effectiveness of a lumbar support continuous passive motion device in the prevention of low back pain during prolonged sitting.

STUDY DESIGN: Subjective ratings of discomfort were compared between a fixed lumbar support and lumbar support continuous passive motion (CPM) device. OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed lumbar support with a lumbar support CPM device during prolonged sitting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To prevent low back pain during prolonged sitting, an inflatable lumbar support CPM has been developed. There are no studies that compare static lumbar support with lumbar CPM using the same pressure in the cushions. METHODS: A total of 31 male volunteers without low back pain sat in the same chair for a 2-hour period on each of 3 consecutive days under 3 randomized test methods: 1, no lumbar support; 2, static lumbar support; and 3, lumbar support CPM. Each subject rated low back pain, stiffness, fatigue, and buttock numbness on a visual analog scale (VAS). Fixed lumbar support and CPM device were compared with a same inflation pressure in the cushion. For 10 subjects, the whole body posture and the pressure distribution changes of the human-seat interface during CPM were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with no lumbar support, a significant improvement in VAS scores for low back pain, stiffness, and fatigue was obtained with both static lumbar support and with lumbar support CPM (P < 0.005). A significant (P < 0.005) improvement for buttock numbness was obtained only with lumbar support CPM. There were no statistical differences in all VAS scores between the fixed lumbar support and the CPM device. A forward rotation of the pelvic region was obtained during inflation of the cushion during CPM. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between cushion inflation and deflation periods both in contact areas and in the peak pressures at the human-seat interface. CONCLUSION: There were no statistical differences in the subjective ratings of discomfort between the fixed lumbar support and the CPM device.

Compliance with continuous passive movement is low after surgical treatment of idiopathic club foot in infants: a prospective, double-blinded clinical study.

Treatment by continuous passive movement at home is an alternative to immobilisation in a cast after surgery for club foot. Compliance with the recommended treatment, of at least four hours daily, is unknown. The duration of treatment was measured in 24 of 27 consecutive children with a mean age of 24 months (5 to 75) following posteromedial release for idiopathic club foot. Only 21% (5) of the children used the continuous passive movement machine as recommended. The mean duration of treatment at home each day was 126 minutes (11 to 496). The mean range of movement for plantar flexion improved from 15.2 degrees (10.0 degrees to 20.6 degrees ) to 18.7 degrees (10.0 degrees to 33.0 degrees ) and for dorsiflexion from 12.3 degrees (7.4 degrees to 19.4 degrees ) to 18.9 degrees (10.0 degrees to 24.1 degrees ) (both, p = 0.0001) when the first third of therapy was compared with the last third. A low level of patient compliance must be considered when the outcome after treatment at home is interpreted.

Exercise combined with continuous passive motion or slider board therapy compared with exercise only: a randomized controlled trial of patients following total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine which method of mobilization - (1) standardized exercises (SE) and continuous passive motion (CPM), (2) SE and slider board (SB) therapy, using an inexpensive, nontechnical device that requires minimal knee active range of motion (ROM), or (3) SE alone-achieved the maximum degree of knee ROM in the fIrst 6 months following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary purpose was to compare health-related quality of life among these 3 groups. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 120 patients (n=40/group) who received a TEA at a teaching hospital between June 1997 and July 1998 and who agreed to participate in the study. METHODS: Subjects were examined preoperatively, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The examination consisted of measurement of knee ROM and completion of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The 3 treatment groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and diagnosis at the start of the study. There were no differences in knee ROM or in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index or SF-36 scores at any of the measurement intervals. The rate of postoperative complications also was not different among the groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: When postoperative rehabilitation regimens that focus on early mobilization of the patient are used, adjunct ROM therapies (CPM and SB) that are added to daily SE sessions are not required. Six months after TEA, patients attain a satisfactory level of knee ROM and function.

Clinical evaluation of an automated turning bed.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess client comfort and sleep quality, client physiologic response (skin and respiratory status), the effect on the need for caregiver assistance, and cost when using an automated turning bed. DESIGN: Nonexperimental, evaluative study. SAMPLE: Twenty-four adult home or long-term care resident subjects who had a degenerative disease, spinal cord injury, stroke, cerebral palsy, or back surgery. METHODS: Each subject agreed to use the automated turning bed for four weeks. Researchers completed a demographic survey and skin assessment, and assessed each subject for pressure ulcer risk and for the need of assistance of a care giver for turning before and after the four weeks of using the turning bed. Subjects rated the turning bed in terms of comfort and sleep quality. FINDINGS: Subjects rated the turning bed as more comfortable than their own bed and expressed satisfaction at the pain relief attained when on the turning bed. While using the turning bed, there was a significant improvement in sleep quality. No skin breakdown or deterioration in respiratory status occurred. Fewer subjects required the assistance of a caregiver for turning when on the turning bed. CONCLUSION: This automated turning bed shows great promise in meeting a need for patients with limited mobility whether they are homebound or in a residential community. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING RESEARCH: Future studies that further investigate use of the turning bed for postoperative back patients while still in the acute care setting are indicated. Replicative studies with a larger sample size are also indicated.

Use of continuous passive motion in pediatric orthopedics.

Continuous passive motion (CPM) was used to maintain or gain hip and knee range of motion in 18 postoperative or postinjury pediatric orthopedic patients. Continuous passive motion was started in the early postoperative period and augmented with physical therapy. The device was well-tolerated in 16 of the 18 patients. In all but one, motion was improved with a progressive decrease in joint pain. In these patients, CPM was found to be a valuable tool in rehabilitation, and did not interfere with traction, open wounds, nursing care, nor external fixation devices.