Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 95
Filtrar
1.
Clin Ther ; 40(10): 1741-1751, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30243768

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Induction immunosuppression therapy is used to support optimal outcomes in kidney transplantation. This study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) versus ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) in kidney transplantation in the Chinese setting from the perspective of the health care payer. METHODS: A 2-part survival model was developed, consisting of a short-term part and a long-term part. The short-term part analyzed the first year, using the decision tree, and consisted of the functioning transplant, acute rejection (AR), delayed graft function (DGF), dialysis, and death health states. The long-term part analyzed 2 to 5 years, using Markov model, and consisted of the functioning transplant, chronic dysfunction, recurring primary disease, dialysis, and death health states, with capture of the association between DGF and graft loss. Costs, including drug acquisition and other direct medical costs, were derived from China IQVIA database (formerly known as IMS) hospitaldatabase, chart review, and physician interviews. Clinical outcomes and utility were retrieved from published literature. The model calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient. Costs and QALYs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Univariate sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainty of the variables on the results. FINDINGS: Patients who received r-ATG had more clinical effectiveness than patients who received ATG-F mainly because of less AR, DGF, and dialysis. The incremental QALY was 0.01 over a 1-year time horizon and 0.0496 over a 5-year time horizon. R-ATG and ATG-F drug costs were ¥10,783 and ¥8409, respectively. However, the total treatment costs of the r-ATG arm were lower than the ATG-F arm because of lower costs related to DGF, AR, dialysis, and adverse events. In total, r-ATG saved ¥5423 over the 1-year and ¥7042 over the 5-year time horizon. R-ATG was dominant with lower total direct medical costs and higher QALYs compared with ATG-F. Both univariate sensitivity analysis and PSA found the robustness of the model results. PSA results indicated that r-ATG was cost-effective compared with ATG-F in 86.81% of the simulations, considering <3 times the gross domestic product per capita as the threshold. IMPLICATIONS: From the perspective of the health care payer, r-ATG should be considered as the preferred treatment agent for induction therapy for Chinese patients undergoing kidney transplantation because of its lower overall medical costs and greater QALYs gained compared with ATG-F. The study was limited by lack of long-term efficacy data among the Chinese population and lack of comprehensive real-world higher quality costs data.


Asunto(s)
Suero Antilinfocítico/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Suero Antilinfocítico/economía , China , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 32(7): 1251-1259, 2017 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28873970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression is required in kidney transplantation to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. We conducted an economic evaluation to support England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in developing updated guidance on the use of immunosuppression, incorporating new immunosuppressive agents, and addressing changes in pricing and the evidence base. METHODS: A discrete-time state transition model was developed to simulate adult kidney transplant patients over their lifetime. A total of 16 different regimens were modelled to assess the cost-effectiveness of basiliximab and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit ATG) as induction agents (with no antibody induction as a comparator) and immediate-release tacrolimus, prolonged-release tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus, everolimus and belatacept as maintenance agents (with ciclosporin and azathioprine as comparators). Graft survival was extrapolated from acute rejection rates, graft function and post-transplant diabetes rates, all estimated at 12 months post-transplantation. National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services costs were included. Cost-effectiveness thresholds of £20 000 and £30 000 per quality-adjusted life year were used. RESULTS: Basiliximab was predicted to be more effective and less costly than rabbit ATG and induction without antibodies. Immediate-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were cost-effective as maintenance therapies. Other therapies were either more expensive and less effective or would only be cost-effective if a threshold in excess of £100 000 per quality-adjusted life year were used. CONCLUSIONS: A regimen comprising induction with basiliximab, followed by maintenance therapy with immediate-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, is likely to be effective for uncomplicated adult kidney transplant patients and a cost-effective use of NHS resources.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Modelos Económicos , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Inglaterra , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
3.
Transplant Proc ; 48(2): 609-11, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27110013

RESUMEN

Renal transplantation is the best therapeutic option for end-stage chronic renal disease. Assuming that it is more advisable if performed early, we aimed to show the clinical, social, and economic advantages in 70% of our patients who were dialyzed only for a short period. For this purpose, we retrospectively collected data over 28 years in 142 kidney transplants performed in patients with <6 weeks on dialysis. 66% of our patients were 30-60 years old; 98% of the patients had living donors. At transplantation, 64% of our patients had no public support; however, 64% of them returned to work and got health insurance 2 months later. Full rehabilitation was achieved in all cases, including integration to the family, return to full-time work, school and university, sports, and reproduction. Immunosuppression consisted of 3 drugs, including steroids, cyclosporine, and azathioprine or mycophenolate. The cost in the 1st year, including patient and donor evaluation, surgery, immunosuppression, and follow-up, was $13,300 USD versus $22,320 for hemodialysis. We conclude that preemptive renal transplantation with <6 weeks on dialysis is the best therapeutic option for end-stage renal failure, especially in developing countries such as Bolivia, where until last year, full public support for renal replacement therapy was unavailable.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Azatioprina/economía , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Bolivia , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Ciclosporina/economía , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/estadística & datos numéricos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Donadores Vivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/economía , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo/economía , Trasplante Homólogo/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Vet Parasitol ; 216: 23-32, 2016 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26801591

RESUMEN

The hypothesis tested in this experiment was that Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection would reduce growth rates of grazing meat-breed lambs; however production loss would be reduced by suppression of the host immune response. The experiment had a 3×2 factorial design using 6-7 month old meat-breed lambs which remained uninfected or infected (IFY) with 2000 or 4000 T. colubriformis L3/week for 12 weeks and were immunosuppressed (SUPY) using methylprednisolone acetate once weekly or remained non-immunosuppressed (SUPN). Immunosuppression increased worm egg counts (WEC) of infected lambs (SUPY 2421 eggs per gram (epg), SUPN 1154 epg on day 84, p<0.05) and T. colubriformis burdens (p<0.05-0.10) and reduced circulating eosinophils (p<0.05 on days 11, 42, 56 and 84) and intestinal total antibody titres (p<0.02). There was a significant (p<0.05) interaction between the main effects of infection and immunosuppression with infection having a larger negative effect on the liveweight of non-immunosuppressed lambs. The immunological response of the host to T. colubriformis infection accounted for 75% of the overall cost of infection (3.1kg) with the majority of this cost occurring during the first 35 days of infection. In contrast, most of the cost associated with the direct effect of infection occurred after day 35. These results confirm in grazing meat-breed lambs that the host's immunological response to T. colubriformis infection is the major component of production loss.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Metilprednisolona/análogos & derivados , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/inmunología , Tricostrongiliasis/veterinaria , Trichostrongylus/inmunología , Abomaso/parasitología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antihelmínticos/análisis , Composición Corporal , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Intestino Delgado/inmunología , Intestino Delgado/parasitología , Recuento de Leucocitos/veterinaria , Masculino , Carne/economía , Metilprednisolona/farmacología , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Metilprednisolona , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Tricostrongiliasis/economía , Tricostrongiliasis/inmunología , Trichostrongylus/efectos de los fármacos , Aumento de Peso
5.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 16(6): 393-401, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26084669

RESUMEN

Beta-cell replacement is the only physiologically relevant alternative to insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Pancreas and islet transplantation from deceased organ donors can provide a new beta-cell pool to produce insulin, help blood glucose management, and delay secondary diabetes complications. For children and adolescents with T1D, whole pancreas transplantation is not a viable option because of surgical complications, whereas islet transplantation, even if it is procedurally simpler, must still overcome the burden of immunosuppression to become a routine therapy for children in the future.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Animales , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inmunología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/economía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/normas , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo/economía , Trasplante Autólogo/normas , Trasplante Heterólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Heterólogo/economía , Trasplante Heterólogo/normas , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/economía , Trasplante Homólogo/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
Transplantation ; 99(11): 2269-73, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050017

RESUMEN

Generic immunosuppressive drugs are available in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Between countries, there are large differences in the market penetration of generic drugs in general, and for immunosuppressive drugs in particular. The registration criteria for generic immunosuppressive drugs are often criticized. However, it is unlikely that the criteria for registration of narrow therapeutic index drugs are going to change, and bioequivalence studies, performed in healthy volunteers, will remain the backbone of the registration process. It would be good if the registration authorities would demand that all generic variants of an innovator drug have the same pill appearance to reduce errors and promote drug adherence.To allow for safe substitution, a number of criteria need to be fulfilled. Generic substitution should not be taken out of the hands of the treating physicians. Generic substitution can only be done safely if initiated by the prescriber, and in well-informed and prepared patients. Payers should refrain from forcing pharmacists to dispense generic drugs in patients on maintenance treatment with innovator drug. Instead, together with transplant societies, they should design guidelines on how to implement generic immunosuppressive drugs into clinical practice. Substitutions must be followed by control visits to check if the patient is taking the medication correctly and if drug exposure remains stable. Inadvertent, uncontrolled substitutions from 1 generic to another, initiated outside the scope of the prescriber, must be avoided as they are unsafe. Repetitive subsequent generic substitutions result in minimal additional cost savings and have an inherent risk of medication errors.


Asunto(s)
Sustitución de Medicamentos/tendencias , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/tendencias , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Órganos/tendencias , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/efectos adversos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Predicción , Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Órganos/economía , Seguridad del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Transplant Proc ; 47(1): 45-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25645767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids. RESULTS: There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Suero Antilinfocítico/economía , Basiliximab , Calcineurina , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Muerte , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Transplantation ; 97(10): 1019-26, 2014 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24770621

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppression (IS) in islet transplantation (Tx) is a double-edged sword: it prevents immunoreaction but has the potential to impair islet engraftment. The aim of this study was to identify in murine animal models the IS platform with the best balance between these two opposite effects. METHODS: To study the impact of IS on islet engraftment diabetic C57BL/6 mice were transplanted with 350 syngeneic islets through the portal vein and treated once-daily with either rapamycin (RAPA; 0.1-0.5-1 mg/kg ip), tacrolimus (FK506; 0.1-0.5-1 mg/kg ip), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 60-120-300 mg/kg oral) or vehicle for 14 days. Islet function was evaluated by measuring not-fasting glycemia and by performing an IVGTT on days 15 and 30 post-Tx. RESULTS: RAPA ≥0.5 mg/Kg, FK506 ≥0.5 mg/Kg, and MMF ≥120 mg/kg had detrimental effects on islet engraftment but not on the function of islets already engrafted in the liver. The effect on engraftment was irreversible and persisted even after IS withdrawal. The lower dose of IS that did not affect engraftment was tested for preventing rejection in the full mismatch allogeneic Tx BALB/c to C57BL/6 model. RAPA and/or FK506 were inefficient in preventing rejection, even when anti-IL2R mAb was added to the IS regimen. On the other hand, MMF alone or in association with FK506 significantly prolonged the time to islet rejection. CONCLUSION: IS showed profound dose-dependent deleterious effects on islet cell engraftment. The MMF/FK506 combination proved the best balance with less toxicity at the time of engraftment and more efficacy in controlling graft rejection.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/terapia , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Tolerancia Inmunológica/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/economía , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/economía , Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto , IMP Deshidrogenasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos
9.
Ann Hematol ; 92(6): 825-30, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23404582

RESUMEN

Acquired severe aplastic anaemia (AA) is a serious condition caused by immune-triggered bone marrow failure. For patients not eligible for bone marrow transplantation, treatment of choice is immunosuppression by a combined treatment with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine. The debate on treatment optimization in AA is focused on conflicting data regarding ATG preparations from horse (h-ATG) versus rabbit (r-ATG), recently favouring h-ATG. H-ATG has been withdrawn from the European market in 2007. Reimbursement for imported preparations from outside Europe is frequently denied in negotiations with statutory health insurance companies. This raises the question of whether h-ATG is cost effective and a sensible investment with regard to healthcare budgets as well as patient health. We modelled the cost effectiveness of r-ATG versus h-ATG based on a recent randomized trial and cost data provided by the hospital pharmacy of Jena University Hospital. We calculated the amount of life years gained and the average incremental costs per life year gained when comparing h-ATG and r-ATG. Our calculations revealed average incremental costs per life year gained of 11,033.80 for the examined patient population treated with h-ATG when compared to r-ATG. Assuming a cost effectiveness threshold of 25,000-35,000 per life year gained, our calculations demonstrate cost effectiveness of h-ATG as compared to r-ATG.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Aplásica/economía , Suero Antilinfocítico/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Modelos Económicos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Anemia Aplásica/terapia , Animales , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recall de Medicamento , Alemania , Caballos/inmunología , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Esperanza de Vida , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Conejos/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Especificidad de la Especie , Valor de la Vida
10.
Ann Transplant ; 17(1): 132-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22466920

RESUMEN

Between August 2006 and August 2009, 34 ethnic Mongolians were the recipients of a kidney transplant at the Central Clinical Hospital in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. In 31 of the operations the donor was either a sibling or parent. In 4 recipients the donors were 2 recently deceased accident victims following controlled cardiac arrest and after next of kin permission. All 4 recipients are alive with life-supporting function. Appropriate legislation was passed in 2008. Thirty-one of the 34 recipients (91%) are alive. The 1-year patient and graft survival is 91% and 82%, respectively. In all cases, recipients received 1 dose of Campath 1 preoperatively followed by monotherapy with either Cyclosporin or Tacrolimus. Due to the remote geographical location of some of the recipients, appropriate serum drug levels were difficult to monitor. Azathioprine was therefore added in the last 13 recipients. Except for acute rejection episodes, no patients received steroid therapy. There were 7 diagnosed and treated acute rejections in the 34 recipients (21%). The mean annual cost of the immunosuppressive therapy period compared favorably with neighboring China and with costs in Spain. We conclude that the use of Campath 1 together with a non-steroid maintenance immunosuppressive regimen provides both economical and acceptable graft and patient survival in a developing country.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/fisiología , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mongolia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto Joven
11.
Transplant Proc ; 44(1): 185-9, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22310611

RESUMEN

Kidney transplantation has become an effective treatment for end-stage renal failure. This study analyzed trends in immunosuppressive agent use after renal transplantation at a medical center in southern Taiwan over a 9-year period (2000-2008) seeking to determine whether the trends were consistent with clinical trial outcomes and published guidelines. We identified adult outpatients who had diagnoses of renal transplantation and who had concurrent immunosuppressive drug claims. From 2000-2008, we discovered 39,189 prescriptions related to kidney transplantation. The overall medication consumption showed an increase from 4.9% to 31.9%. Cyclosporine was the main determinant of overall drug costs during these 9 years. The long-term prescribing trend for immunosuppressive use among renal transplantation outpatients showed a clear change during the course of the study. Tacrolimus and sodium mycophenolate/mycophenolate mofetil were used increasingly as combination therapy. However, our survey revealed that management of this transplantation population, especially regarding the use of either calcineurin inhibitor or corticosteroids, was based on potential long-term side effects.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/tendencias , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Quimioterapia Combinada , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Taiwán , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 31(1): 20-3, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22194185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cost of post liver transplant immunosuppression is a major financial burden to patients in developing countries. In India, generic varieties of various immunosuppressants are often used without any definite evidence to their efficacy. This study was aimed at studying the dosage, side effect profile and cost of post-liver transplant immunosuppression using generic products in Indian population following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: Data on dose, cost, and toxicity of immunosuppression were retrieved retrospectively from case records of 59 patients who had undergone LDLT at our center. RESULTS: Adequate immunosuppression was obtained by tacrolimus (Pangraf(®)-Panacea) of 0.04 to 0.05 mg/Kg, and mycophenolate (Mycept(®)-Panacea) of 500 to 1,000 mg; the acute rejection rate was 15% during the first month. Serum tacrolimus levels were 5.4 to 7.3 ng/mL. The cost of immunosuppression varied from Rs. 28,705 in the first month to Rs. 8,820 per month at the end of first year, amounting to an average monthly cost of Rs. 17,250. Approximately 23% and 51% of cost was for mycophenolate and for drug level measurement of tacrolimus, respectively. CONCLUSION: Average cost of immunosuppression after LDLT in India is much lower than that reported elsewhere in the world, since lower drug doses are needed and cheaper generic drugs are available. This can be reduced further by decreasing the frequency of tacrolimus drug level measurement.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/economía , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Donadores Vivos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , India , Hepatopatías/economía , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Tacrolimus/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Transplantation ; 92(6): 653-7, 2011 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21788920

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The first generic tacrolimus product gained Food and Drug Administration approval in August 2009. This prospective, observational trial sought to determine the need for dose titrations and measure drug cost savings on conversion to generic tacrolimus. METHODS: Transplant recipients on stable tacrolimus doses were converted from brand to generic tacrolimus on a mg:mg basis. Data were collected at the time of generic conversion (study arm) and at a time point exactly 6 months before conversion (control arm) for all subjects. RESULTS: Seventy conversions from four centers are reported. Subjects were a mean of 70 months after kidney (n=37), liver (n=28), or multiorgan (n=5) transplant. In the study arm, mean tacrolimus doses were 4.4 and 4.5 mg/d and mean tacrolimus trough concentrations were 5.8 and 5.9 ng/mL before and after conversion, respectively. In the control arm, mean tacrolimus doses were 4.6 and 4.6 mg/d and mean tacrolimus trough concentrations were 6.1 and 5.9 ng/mL before and after the control time point, respectively. Dose titrations occurred in five patients (7%) in the control arm and 15 patients (21%) in the study arm (P=0.028). Mean monthly drug costs were $645 for brand, $593 for generic, and $595 for generic after dose titrations. Mean monthly patient copays were $38 for brand and $15 for generic. CONCLUSIONS: These cumulative data show that dose requirements and trough levels are similar between brand and generic tacrolimus and that generic substitution allows for savings. However, postconversion monitoring is prudent as patients may require dose titration.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Tacrolimus/economía , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Área Bajo la Curva , Costos de los Medicamentos , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 9(2): 121-7, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21453230

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Steroids have had the main role in renal transplant for more than 4 decades. However, chronic use of steroids is associated with many comorbidities, owing to a lack of assessing cost-benefit of steroid avoidance in live-donor renal allotransplants. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, we aimed to assess the cost-benefit of a steroid-free immunosuppression regimen among Egyptian live-donor renal transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were randomly allocated to receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for only 3 days (n=50 patients; study group) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids on a maintenance basis (n=50 patients; control group). All patients received basiliximab (Simulect) induction, with median follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable graft and patient survivals, rejection episodes, and graft functioning. Posttransplant comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group. Hypertension was detected in 4% of steroid-free group versus 24% in the steroid-maintenance group (P = .0009). Posttransplant diabetes mellitus, serious infections, and hyperlipidemia were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group (P < .05). Associated hospitalization costs were 2.2-fold higher in the steroid-maintenance group than they were in the steroid-free group. One year after transplant, the cost of managing posttransplant comorbidities was significantly higher in steroid-maintenance group, despite comparable costs of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: In low, immunologic risk recipients of live-donor renal transplants, using basiliximab induction and maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, steroid avoidance was associated with lower first annual total costs despite comparable immunosuppression costs, which was attributed to lower costs of associated morbidities.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Donadores Vivos , Esteroides , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Basiliximab , Comorbilidad , Contraindicaciones , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/economía , Hiperlipidemias/etiología , Hipertensión/economía , Hipertensión/etiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Esteroides/efectos adversos , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Immunotherapy ; 2(6): 879-88, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21091118

RESUMEN

Of the numerous risks associated with immunotherapy for the prevention of rejection, cost is perhaps the most universal. In the USA and some other countries, the costs of immunosuppression make transplantation unavailable for some medically viable transplant candidates, and for others who receive a transplant, the long-term costs are economically crippling. Minimization and tapering of immunosuppression, use of generics, manipulation of metabolism, infection surveillance instead of prophylaxis, and advantageous routes of administration are some strategies that can be employed to reduce immunotherapy expense. Using these strategies, we describe an immunosuppression regimen for kidney transplantation that might be only a third of the cost of current 'standard' regimens in the USA. Such a regimen might allow some patients who might not otherwise qualify economically to safely receive a kidney transplant. The purpose of creating an alternative, lower-cost immunotherapy regimen is to give patients a choice. Responsible stewardship of scarce donor organs is the primary, and clearly appropriate, limiting factor.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/economía , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos
20.
Clin Nephrol ; 74 Suppl 1: S142-9, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20979981

RESUMEN

AIMS: To describe the dynamic of a model of public government partnership for dialysis and transplantation in developing countries. MATERIALS: A model was established on the philosophy of public-government partnership to provide an integrated dialysis and transplant service "Free with dignity" with lifelong follow-up care and medications. The government provided 50% of funds and the public was motivated to donate the rest. This included affluent individuals, corporations, business houses and the general public. RESULTS: This model has been sustained for the last two decades. In 2008, 655,000 patients were treated at SIUT. Over 600 patients are dialyzed each day with a total of 165,411 dialysis sessions/year. Thus far 2,249 transplants have been performed, 431 in 2008. One- and 5-year graft survival rates were 92% and 85%, respectively. The laboratory performed 4.1 million tests and radiological investigations numbered 164,217. Over $ 6 million were spent on medications. Free services offered by the model have motivated the government to increase its funding from $ 2.1 million in 1998 to $ 10 million in 2008 and the public has matched these figures with total donations exceeding $ 20 million. CONCLUSIONS: For transplantation to be successful in developing countries, it has to be made available to the common people who constitute 90% of the population. Our model of public-government partnership has made dialysis and transplantation available to the disenfranchised with lifelong follow-up and medications. Transplantation has become relevant to them, resulting in societal acceptance of transplantation as a preferred mode of therapy. This has motivated society to support both living related and deceased donor programs.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Donadores Vivos , Ahorro de Costo , Países en Desarrollo , Financiación Gubernamental , Organización de la Financiación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/economía , Modelos Organizacionales , Pakistán , Diálisis Renal/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...