Spatiotemporal perturbations of pronuclear breakdown preceding syngamy affect early human embryo development: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: During fertilisation, female and male pronuclei (PNs) migrate to the centre of the ooplasm, juxtapose, and break down synchronously in preparation for the first mitosis. While PN non-juxtaposition and PN breakdown (PNBD) asynchrony are occasionally observed, their developmental implications remain uncertain. This study investigated the possible relationships among the two phenomena, preimplantation development patterns, and live birth rates in single blastocyst transfers. METHODS: A total of 1455 fertilised oocytes cultured in a time-lapse incubator were retrospectively analysed. Fertilised oocytes were divided into four groups according to the presence of PN juxtaposition and breakdown synchrony. The relationships of abnormal PN behaviour with embryo morphokinetics, blastocyst formation, and live birth were evaluated. RESULTS: PN non-juxtaposition and asynchrony were observed in 1.9% and 1.0% of fertilised oocytes, respectively. The blastocyst cryopreservation rates in the synchronous-non-juxtaposed and asynchronous-non-juxtaposed groups were significantly lower than that in the synchronous-juxtaposed group. The rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth were comparable among the groups. Non-juxtaposition was significantly associated with increased trichotomous cleavage at the first cytokinesis (P < 0.0001) and an increase in the time interval from PNBD to first cleavage (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, asynchronous PNBD was significantly correlated with increased rapid cleavage at the first cytokinesis (P = 0.0100). CONCLUSION: Non-juxtaposition and asynchronous PNBD is associated with abnormal mitosis at the first cleavage and impaired preimplantation development. However, embryos displaying abnormal PNBD may develop to blastocyst stage and produce live births, suggesting blastocyst transfer as a more appropriate culture strategy.

Could we offer mitochondrial donation or similar assisted reproductive technology to South African patients with mitochondrial DNA disease?

The decision of the UK House of Commons in 2015 to endorse the use of pioneering in vitro fertilisation techniques to protect future generations from the risk of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disease has sparked worldwide controversy and debate. The availability of such technologies could benefit women at risk of transmitting deleterious mutations. MtDNA disease certainly occurs in South Africa (SA) in all population groups. However, diagnostic strategies and practices for identifying individuals who would benefit from technologies such as IVF have in the past been suboptimal in this country. New developments in the molecular diagnostic services available to SA patients, as well as better education of referring clinicians and the implementation of more structured, population-appropriate diagnostic strategies, may open the floor to this debate in SA.