Outcomes from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following treosulfan-based conditioning: A clinical and pharmacokinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to report our experience with treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for patients with non-malignant hematologic conditions, correlating clinical outcomes at different time points post-transplant with treosulfan exposure (AUC). METHODS: This study was a single-center observational study investigating overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS) end-points post-transplant. The consequences of treosulfan AUC with respect to toxicity, correction of underlying disease, and long-term chimerism were also explored using pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received 49 transplants with treosulfan and fludarabine-based conditioning between 2005 and 2023. Twenty-four patients also received thiotepa. Donor chimerism was assessed on either whole blood or sorted cell lines at different time points post-transplant. Thirty-nine patients received treosulfan pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate cumulative AUC, with five infants receiving real-time assessment to facilitate daily dose adjustment. OS, DFS, and EFS were 87%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Median follow-up was 32.1 months (range 0.82-160 months) following transplant. Lower EFS was associated with patient age (<1 year; p = .057) and lower cumulative treosulfan dose (<42 g/m2; p = .003). Stable donor chimerism in B-cell, NK-cell, and granulocyte lineages at 1-year post-transplant were more prevalent in patients receiving thiotepa conditioning. Two infants required daily dose adjustment to treosulfan to avoid high AUC. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent clinical outcomes and stable chimerism were observed in this patient series. The addition of thiotepa conferred no significant toxicity and trended toward sustained ongoing donor engraftment. Correlating treosulfan AUC with long-term patient outcomes is required.

Pharmacokinetics of thiotepa in high-dose regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in Japanese patients with pediatric tumors or adult lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Thiotepa is used in high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to treat solid tumors and hematological malignancies. This Phase 1 study was conducted to establish the pharmacokinetics (PK) of thiotepa in a Japanese population. METHODS: HDT/HSCT was performed in pediatric patients (≥ 2 years) with solid tumors or brain tumors (thiotepa 200 mg/m2/day IV-infused over 24 h on HSCT Days - 12, - 11, - 5, and - 4 and melphalan 70 mg/m2/day IV-infused over 1 h on Days - 11, - 5, and - 4) and adult patients (≥ 16 years) with malignant lymphoma (thiotepa 200 mg/m2/day 2-h IV-infusion on HSCT Days - 4 and - 3 plus busulfan 0.8 mg/kg 2-h IV-infusion every 6 h from HSCT Days - 8 to - 5). Pharmacokinetics of thiotepa were assessed following initial dose. Safety and efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: Nine pediatric and 10 adult patients were enrolled. Mean volume of distribution (Vz) of thiotepa normalized with body surface area (BSA) was lower for pediatric patients (16.4 L/m2) compared with adult patients (26.4 L/m2) as expected due to the higher specific surface area of children. Clearance and biological half-life were similar between pediatric and adult patients. Two serious adverse events (cardiac arrest and pulmonary edema) were observed. Survival rate (Day 100 post-HSCT) was 77.8% (95% CI 36.5-93.9%) for pediatric patients and 100% for adult patients. CONCLUSION: Thiotepa elimination was comparable in pediatric and adult patients with cancer. Lower Vz in pediatric compared with adult patients was expected. HDT with thiotepa prior to autologous HSCT was well tolerated. STUDY REGISTRATION: Japic CTI-163433.

Altered cyclophosphamide and thiotepa pharmacokinetics in a patient with moderate renal insufficiency.

PURPOSE: We report a patient with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, CL(cr) = 38 mL/min) who received high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m(2) day(-1)), thiotepa (120 mg/m(2) day(-1)) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 mg min/mL day(-1)) for four consecutive days. METHODS: Blood samples were collected on day 1 and 3 and plasma levels of cyclophosphamide, its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, its main metabolite tepa and carboplatin were determined. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that the elimination of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin, but especially tepa was strongly reduced in this patient, resulting in increased exposures to these compounds of 67, 43, 30 and 157%, respectively, compared to a reference population (n = 24) receiving similar doses. Exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide increased 11%. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that it may not be necessary to alter the dose of cyclophosphamide in patients with moderate renal impairment. However, because high exposures to thiotepa and tepa have been correlated with increased toxicity, caution should be applied when administering thiotepa to patients with renal insufficiency.

Polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes (GST, CYP2B6 and CYP3A) affect the pharmacokinetics of thiotepa and tepa.

AIMS: Thiotepa is widely used in high-dose chemotherapy. Previous studies have shown relations between exposure and severe organ toxicity. Thiotepa is metabolized by cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase enzymes. Polymorphisms of these enzymes may affect elimination of thiotepa and tepa, its main metabolite. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of known allelic variants in CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genes on pharmacokinetics of thiotepa and tepa. METHODS: White patients (n = 124) received a high-dose regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin as intravenous infusions. Genomic DNA was analysed using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Plasma concentrations of thiotepa and tepa were determined using validated GC and LC-MS/MS methods. Relations between allelic variants and elimination pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (nonmem). RESULTS: The polymorphisms CYP2B6 C1459T, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, GSTA1 (C-69T, G-52A) and GSTP1 C341T had a significant effect on clearance of thiotepa or tepa. Although significant, most effects were generally not large. Clearance of thiotepa and tepa was predominantly affected by GSTP1 C341T polymorphism, which had a frequency of 9.3%. This polymorphism increased non-inducible thiotepa clearance by 52% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41, 64, P < 0.001] and decreased tepa clearance by 32% (95% CI 29, 35, P < 0.001) in heterozygous patients, which resulted in an increase in combined exposure to thiotepa and tepa of 45% in homozygous patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the presently evaluated variant alleles explain only a small part of the substantial interindividual variability in thiotepa and tepa pharmacokinetics. Patients homozygous for the GSTP1 C341T allele may have enhanced exposure to thiotepa and tepa.

Population pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and its metabolites 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, 2-dechloroethylcyclophosphamide, and phosphoramide mustard in a high-dose combination with Thiotepa and Carboplatin.

The anticancer prodrug cyclophosphamide (CP) is activated by the formation of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4OHCP), which decomposes into phosphoramide mustard (PM). This activation pathway is inhibited by thiotepa. CP is inactivated by formation of 2-dechloroethylcyclophosphamide (2DCECP). The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the complex pharmacokinetics of CP, 4OHCP, 2DCECP, and PM when CP is administered in a high-dose combination with thiotepa and carboplatin. Patients received a combination of CP (1000-1500 mg/m/d), carboplatin (265-400 mg/m/d), and thiotepa (80-120 mg/m/d) administered in short infusions over 4 days. Twenty blood samples were collected per patient per course. Concentrations of CP, 4OHCP, 2DCECP, PM, thiotepa, and tepa were determined in plasma. Using NONMEM, an integrated population pharmacokinetic model was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of CP, 4OHCP, 2DCECP, and PM, including the already described processes of autoinduction of CP and the interaction with thiotepa. Data were available on 35 patients (70 courses). The pharmacokinetics of CP were described with a 2-compartment model, and those of 4OHCP, 2DCECP, and PM with 1-compartment models. Before onset of autoinduction, it was assumed that CP is eliminated through a noninducible pathway accounting for 20% of total CP clearance, whereas 2 inducible pathways resulted in formation of 4OHCP (75%) and 2DCECP (5%). It was assumed that 4OHCP was fully converted to PM. Induction of CP metabolism was mediated by 2 hypothetical amounts of enzyme whose quantities increased in time in the presence of CP (kenz=0.0223 and 0.0198 hours). Induction resulted in an increased formation of 4OHCP (approximately 50%), PM (approximately 50%), and 2DCECP (approximately 35%) during the 4-day course, and concomitant decreased exposure to CP (approximately 50%). The formation of 2DCECP was not inhibited by thiotepa. Apparent volumes of distribution of CP, PM, and 2DCECP could be estimated being 43.7, 55.5, and 18.5 L, respectively. Exposure to metabolites varied up to 9-fold. The complex population pharmacokinetics of CP, 4OHCP, 2DCECP, and PM in combination with thiotepa and carboplatin has been established and may form the basis for further treatment optimization with this combination.

The extent of chromosomal aberrations induced by chemotherapy in non-human primates depends on the schedule of administration.

We utilized a non-human primate model, the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), to quantitate the extent of chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells following chemotherapy. Thiotepa, etoposide, and paclitaxel were chosen as the chemotherapy agents due to their distinct mechanisms of action. Chromosomal aberrations were quantitated using traditional Giemsa stain. We sought to evaluate the extent to which genotoxicity was dependent on the schedule of administration by giving chemotherapy as either a bolus or a 96 h continuous infusion. Neutropenia and areas under the concentration curve (AUCs) were monitored to ensure comparable cytotoxicity and dose administered. At least 100 metaphases were scored in each marrow sample by an investigator unaware of the treatment history of the animals. All three drugs produced a statistically significant higher percentage of abnormal metaphases following bolus chemotherapy (p<0.0001, p=0.0015 and p<0.0001 for thiotepa, etoposide and paclitaxel, respectively). We conclude that infusional administration of thiotepa, etoposide and paclitaxel is less genotoxic to normal bone marrow cells than is bolus administration. These results suggest infusional regimens may be considered where there are concerns about long-term genotoxic sequelae, including secondary cancer, teratogenicity, or possibly the development of drug resistance. We believe this approach provides a reproducible model in which drugs and eventually, regimens can be compared.

Aprepitant inhibits cyclophosphamide bioactivation and thiotepa metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving the highly emetogenic high-dose chemotherapy regimen with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTC) may benefit from the neurokin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant in addition to standard anti-emetic therapy. As aprepitant has been shown to be a moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme, its effect on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa was evaluated. Moreover, preliminary results on the clinical efficacy of aprepitant in the CTC regimen are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients were enrolled in a protocol that employed a 4-day course of CTC high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m2/day), thiotepa (120 mg/m2/day) and carboplatin (AUC 5 mg min/ml/day). Two patients received the tCTC protocol, which comprises two-third of the dose of CTC. In addition to standard anti-emetic therapy, the patients received aprepitant from one day before the start of their course until 3 days after chemotherapy. Blood samples were collected on days one and three of the course and analyzed for cyclophosphamide and its activated metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa and its main active metabolite tepa. The influence of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa was analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis including a reference population of 49 patients receiving the same chemotherapy regimen without aprepitant and sampled under the same conditions. The frequency of nausea and vomiting in the six patients receiving CTC was compared with those of the last 22 consecutive patients receiving CTC chemotherapy without aprepitant. Inhibitory activity of aprepitant on cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism was also tested in human liver microsomes. RESULTS: In our patient population, the rate of autoinduction of cyclophosphamide (P=0.040) and the formation clearance of tepa (P<0.001) were reduced with 23% and 33% when aprepitant was co-administered, respectively. Exposures to the active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and tepa were therefore reduced (5% and 20%, respectively) in the presence of aprepitant. In human liver microsomes, the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of aprepitant for inhibition of cyclophosphamide (IC50=1.3 microg/ml) and thiotepa (IC50=0.27 microg/ml) metabolism were within the therapeutic range. Patients receiving aprepitant experienced less frequently CINV both during and after the CTC course compared with the reference population (nausea 3.7 days vs. 5.8 days, P=0.052; vomiting 0.5 days vs. 4.8 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Aprepitant inhibited both cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism, most probably due to inhibition of the CYP 3A4 and/or 2B6 isoenzymes. The effects of this interaction are, however, small compared to the total variability. Addition of aprepitant may provide superior protection against vomiting in patients receiving the highly emetogenic high-dose CTC chemotherapy.

Accuracy, feasibility, and clinical impact of prospective Bayesian pharmacokinetically guided dosing of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin in high-dose chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Relationships between toxicity and pharmacokinetics have been shown for cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTC) in high-dose chemotherapy. We prospectively evaluated whether variability in exposure to CTC and their activated metabolites can be decreased with pharmacokinetically guided dose administration and evaluated its clinical effect. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received multiple 4-day courses of cyclophosphamide (1,000-1,500 mg/m2/d), thiotepa (80-120 mg/m2/d), and carbop latin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve 3.3-5 mg x min/mL/d). Doses were adapted on day 3 based on pharmacokinetic analyses of cyclophosphamide, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, tepa, and carboplatin done on day 1 using a Bayesian algorithm. Doses were also adjusted before and during second and third courses. Observed toxicity was compared with that in patients receiving standard dose CTC (n = 43). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (108 courses) were included. For cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin, a total of 39, 58, and 65 dose adaptations were done within courses and 17, 40, and 43 before courses. The precision within which the target exposure was reached improved compared with no adaptation, especially after within-course adaptations (precision for cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin is 19%, 16%, and 13%, respectively); >85% led to an exposure within +/-25% of the target compared with 60% without dose adjustments. Toxicity was similar to that in a reference population, although the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian pharmacokinetically guided dosing for CTC was feasible and led to a marked reduction in variability of exposure.

Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic Model of both cyclophosphamide and thiotepa suggesting a mutual drug-drug interaction.

PURPOSE/AIMS: Cyclophosphamide (CP) and thiotepa (TT) are frequently administered simultaneously in high-dose chemotherapy regimens. The prodrug CP shows strong autoinduction resulting in increased formation of its activated metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4OHCP). TT inhibits this bioactivation of CP. Previously, we successfully modelled CP bioactivation and the effect of TT on the autoinduction. Recently we suggested that CP may also induce the conversion of TT in to its metabolite tepa (T). The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the influence of CP on TT metabolism can be described with a population pharmacokinetic model and whether this interaction can be incorporated in an integrated model describing both CP and TT pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from 49 patients receiving 86 courses of a combination of high-dose CP (4000 or 6000 mg/m2), TT (320 or 480 mg/m2) and carboplatin (1067 or 1600 mg/m2) given in short infusions during four consecutive days. For each patient, approximately 20 plasma samples were available per course. Concentrations of CP, 4OHCP, TT and T were determined using GC and HPLC. Kinetic data were processed using NONMEM. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of TT and T were described with a two-compartment model. TT was eliminated through a non-inducible and an inducible pathway, the latter resulting information of T (ClindTT = 12.4 l/hr, ClnonindTT = 17.0 l/hr). Induction of TT metabolism was mediated by a hypothetical amount of enzyme, different from that involved in CP induction, whose amount increased with time in the presence of CP. The amount of enzyme followed a zero-order formation and a decrease with a first-order elimination rate constant of 0.0343 hr(-1) (t1/2 = 20 hr). This model was significantly better than a model lacking the induction by CP. The model was successfully incorporated into the previously published pharmacokinetic model for CP, and resulted in comparable parameter estimates for this compound and its metabolite 4OHCP. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of TT, when administered in combination with CP, were successfully described. The model confirms induction of TT metabolism with time and it appears likely that CP is responsible for this phenomenon. The existence of a mutual pharmacokinetic interaction between CP and TT, as described in our integrated model, may be relevant in clinical practice.

Sorption of thiotepa to polyurethane catheter causes falsely elevated plasma levels.

Central venous access catheters are commonly used in clinical oncology. The double lumen variant is applied in pharmacokinetic studies for simultaneous administration and blood sampling when frequent blood collections are necessary. Occlusion of one lumen, a common complication, necessitates the investigator perform blood sampling through the administration lumen after interrupting the infusion. Plasma concentrations measured in this sample can be influenced by sorption of the previously infused compound to the catheter lumen. In this study, the quality of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin plasma concentrations is investigated when sampling is performed through the administration lumen.

Relationship between irreversible alopecia and exposure to cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTC) in high-dose chemotherapy.

Reversible alopecia is a commonly observed, important and distressing complication of chemotherapy. Permanent alopecia, however, is rare after standard-dose therapy, but has occasionally been observed after high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTC). We evaluated the relationships between total exposure to these three compounds and their different metabolites in the high-dose CTC regimen, and the subsequent development of irreversible alopecia. Twenty-four patients received two or three courses of high-dose CTC, each followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Plasma levels of cyclophosphamide, its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, its active metabolite tepa, and carboplatin were determined, and the area-under-the-plasma concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) of the compounds were calculated. Eight of the 24 patients included in the study developed permanent alopecia, while seven had normal hair regrowth and nine patients developed incomplete and/or thin hair regrowth. The carboplatin AUC and the summed AUC of thiotepa and tepa were both significantly associated with increasing irreversibility of hair loss. These results suggest that high exposure to carboplatin and the sum of the thiotepa and tepa exposure may lead to the development of permanent alopecia. This knowledge could guide therapeutic drug monitoring in order to prevent the occurrence of permanent alopecia and thereby improve the patients' quality of life.

Relationship between exposure and toxicity in high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy in combination with peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation is widely used in the treatment of several malignancies. The use of high-dose chemotherapy can be complicated by the occurrence of severe and sometimes life threatening toxicity. A wide interpatient variability in toxicity is encountered, which may be caused by variability in the pharmacokinetics of the agents. The aim of this study was to establish the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin and all relevant metabolites in a widely used high-dose combination and to study possible relationships between the pharmacokinetics and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were collected from patients treated with modifications of the CTCb regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide (1000-1500 mg/m2/day), carboplatin (265-400 mg/m2/day) and thiotepa (80-120 mg/m2/day) as short infusions for four consecutive days. Thiotepa and its main metabolite tepa, ultrafilterable carboplatin, cyclophosphamide and its activated metabolites 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard were determined. Pharmacokinetics were assessed with the use of population pharmacokinetic analyses. Relationship between the area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of these compounds and toxicity were tested. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (83 courses of chemotherapy) was included. Relationships were identified between elevation of transaminases and the thiotepa and tepa AUC, mucositis and the tepa AUC and ototoxicity and the carboplatin AUC. A strong trend between the 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide AUC and veno-occlusive disease was found. CONCLUSIONS: The complex pharmacokinetics of the different agents and their metabolites have been established and several relationships between the pharmacokinetics and toxicity were identified. These findings may form the basis for further treatment optimisation and dose-individualisation in this high-dose chemotherapy combination.

Phase II study of a multi-course high-dose chemotherapy regimen incorporating cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin in stage IV breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of multiple courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin and thiotepa with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation in women with advanced breast cancer. Forty-one patients with advanced hormone-refractory breast cancer were enrolled in the study. The treatment started with two courses of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 120 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FE(120)C) followed by PBPC harvesting. The high-dose regimen consisted of three subsequent courses of 'tiny' CTC, cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m(2), thiotepa 320 mg/m(2) and carboplatin 1060 mg/m(2) (target AUC 13.3 mg/ml/min) (tCTC) divided over 4 consecutive days. The second and third courses were scheduled to begin on day 28 after the previous transplantation. A total of 86 tCTC courses was given to 33 of the 41 enrolled patients. Major toxicities consisted of hemorrhagic cystitis (six patients), prolonged gastro-intestinal toxicity (three patients) and veno-occlusive disease (two patients). There was one therapy-related death (unknown cause). Twenty patients (49%) achieved a complete response, nine (22%) a partial response and three patients stable disease after treatment. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 43 months (range 25-61). Six patients remain in complete remission beyond 3 years. At 4 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole patient group were 23 and 30% with a median duration of 12 and 27 months, respectively and for FE(120)C-responsive patients 32 and 36%, respectively with a median duration of 15 and 33 months. In the patient group with a PFS > or = 18 months all patients had limited disease (metastatic disease in only one or two sites) and fewer patients had bone or liver metastases compared to the overall patient group (33% vs 51%). This report shows that three closely spaced courses of tCTC are feasible, with acceptable toxicity. Triple tCTC can achieve complete or partial remission in most patients and long-term PFS in a selected subgroup of patients who have limited metastatic disease and are responsive to conventional-dose chemotherapy.

A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for the cytochrome P450 drug-drug interaction between cyclophosphamide and thioTEPA and the autoinduction of cyclophosphamide.

Cyclophosphamide (CP) is widely used in high-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with thioTEPA. CP is a prodrug and is activated by cytochrome P450 to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCP) which yields the final cytotoxic metabolite phosphoramide mustard (PM). The metabolism of CP into HCP exhibits autoinduction but is inhibited by thioTEPA. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for the bioactivation route of CP incorporating the phenomena of both autoinduction and the drug-drug interaction between CP and thioTEPA. Plasma samples were collected from 34 patients who received high-dose CP, thioTEPA and carboplatin in short infusions during 4 consecutive days. Elimination of CP was described by a noninducible route and an inducible route leading to HCP. The latter route was mediated by a hypothetical amount of enzyme. Autoinduction leads to a zero-order increase in amount of this enzyme during treatment. Inhibition by thioTEPA was modeled as a reversible, competitive, concentration-dependent inhibition. PM pharmacokinetics were described by first-order formation from HCP and first-order elimination. The final models for CP, HCP, and PM provided an adequate fit of the experimental data. The volume of distribution, noninducible and initial inducible clearances of CP were 31.0 L, 1.58 L/hr and 4.76 L/hr, respectively. The enzyme amount increased with a zero-order rate constant of 0.041 amount * hr-1. After each thioTEPA infusion, however, approximately 80% of the enzyme was inhibited. This inhibition was reversible with a half-life of 6.5 hr. The formation and elimination rate constants of PM were 1.58 and 0.338 hr-1, respectively. The developed model enabled the assessment of the complex pharmacokinetics of CP in combination with thio TEPA. This model provided an adequate description of enzyme induction and inhibition and can be used for treatment optimization in this combination.

High-dose thiotepa and melphalan with hemopoietic progenitor support following induction therapy with epirubicin-paclitaxel-containing regimens in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data from phase III randomized studies have failed to show benefit of HDC given as consolidation after anthracycline and alkylating-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Moderate activity of induction regimens and selection of chemoresistant clones are among the possible reasons for these disappointing results. We therefore have designed a phase II study where high-dose alkylating agents are given as consolidation after an induction treatment including the most active agents (epirubicin and paclitaxel) without alkylating agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MBC not previously treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease were eligible. After six courses of epirubicin-paclitaxel +/- gemcitabine patients received a course of thiotepa 600 mg/m2 + melphalan 160 mg/m2 with hemopoietic support. Pharmacokinetic parameters of thiotepa and melphalan were measured and related to treatment outcomes. The L-VEF of the patients was monitored before and after treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients have been treated. Before HDC 14 patients were in CR, and 34 in PR. A median of 6.92 x 10(6) (range 1.53-16.6) CD34+ cells/kg were reinfused after HDC. Median days (range) to neutrophils > 0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelets > 20,000 x 10(9)/l were 9.5 (9-33) and 10 days (9-32), respectively. Symptomatic CHF was observed in two patients (4.1%). Cmax and AUC of thiotepa showed a linear relationship with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS): r2 = 0.6. After HDC the conversion rate from PR to CR was 44.1%. At five years progression-free and overall survival rates are 37.5% and 65%, respectively. A treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose thiotepa and melphalan after an epirubicin-paclitaxel-containing treatment is feasible, devoid of significant cardiotoxicity and very active. Pharmacokinetic parameters of high-dose thiotepa might be linked to treatment outcome.

Population pharmacokinetics of thioTEPA and its active metabolite TEPA in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy.

AIMS: To study the population pharmacokinetics of thioTEPA and its main metabolite TEPA in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy consisting of thioTEPA (80-120 mg x m(-2) x day(-1)), cyclophosphamide (1000-1500 mg x m(-2) x day(-1)) and carboplatin (265-400 mg x m(-2) x day(-1)) for 4 days. METHODS: ThioTEPA and TEPA kinetic data were processed with a two-compartment model using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling program NONMEM. Interindividual variability (IIV), interoccasion variability (IOV) and residual variability in the pharmacokinetics were estimated. The influence of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics was also determined. RESULTS: A total number of 40 patients receiving 65 courses of chemotherapy was included. Clearance of thioTEPA (CL) was 34 l x h(-1) with an IIV and IOV of 18 and 11%, respectively. The volume of distribution of thioTEPA was 47 l (IIV = 7.5%; IOV = 19%). The fraction of thioTEPA converted to TEPA divided by the volume of distribution of TEPA was 0.030 l-1 (IIV = 39%; IOV = 32%) and the elimination rate constant of TEPA was 0.64 h(-1) (IIV = 27%; IOV = 32%). CL of thioTEPA was correlated with alkaline phosphatase and serum albumin. The volume of distribution of thioTEPA and the elimination rate constant of TEPA were correlated with total protein levels and body weight, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A model for the description of the pharmacokinetics of thioTEPA and TEPA was developed. Factors involved in the interpatient variability of thioTEPA and TEPA pharmacokinetics were identified. Since, IOV of both thioTEPA and TEPA was equal to or smaller than IIV, therapeutic drug monitoring based on data of previous courses may be meaningful using this population model.

Validation of a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy for thiotepa in a high-dose chemotherapy regimen.

Thiotepa is an alkylating agent widely used in high-dose chemotherapy. The pharmacokinetics of thiotepa and its main metabolite tepa show a wide interpatient variability, which may be responsible for the interpatient variability in toxicity. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a pharmacokinetically guided dosing strategy with the sum of the thiotepa and tepa area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the target parameter. A total of 46 patients received 77 courses of chemotherapy with thiotepa (80-120 mg/m(2) per day) divided into two daily 30-minute infusions in combination with cyclophosphamide and carboplatin. Patients received up to three courses of chemotherapy. The interpatient, course-to-course, day-to-day, and residual variability in the pharmacokinetics of thiotepa and tepa were estimated with a population analysis with the software program NONMEM. The planned strategy consisted of the collection of blood samples on day 1 and either day 3 or day 4 of each 4-day course. The thiotepa dose was planned to be adjusted on day 3 of each course and before the start of a new course on the basis of Bayesian predictions of the pharmacokinetics with data of day 1 and/or the possible previous course. The prediction procedure was validated by dividing the dataset into an index and validation set. The Bayesian predictions of the validation set were compared with true AUC values generated with individual fits of each course. The performance of the complete strategy was tested with a simulation procedure in 1,000 patients. Interpatient variability and course-to-course variability were in the same order (+/-20%); day-to-day variability was less (+/-15%). The sampling strategy resulted in predictions of the AUC without bias with acceptable precision (+/-20%). The simulation showed that variability in exposure was effectively decreased by the dosing strategy. This strategy resulted in a reduction in the variability of the exposure to thiotepa and tepa and can be implemented in a clinical study.