Video-assisted pulmonary metastectomy is equivalent to thoracotomy regarding resection status and survival.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases leads to prolonged survival if strictly indicated. Usually, thoracotomy with manual palpation of the entire lung with lymph node dissection or sampling is performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary metastectomy with curative intent. METHODS: In this study, all patients with suspected pulmonary metastasis (n = 483) who visited the Center for Thoracic Surgery in Regensburg, between January 2009 and December 2017 were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients underwent metastectomy with curative intent. VATS was performed in 63 (25.1%) patients, 54 (85.7%) of whom had a solitary metastasis. Wedge resection was the most performed procedure in patients treated with VATS (82.5%, n = 52) and thoracotomy (72.3%, n = 136). Postoperative revisions were necessary in nine patients (4.8%), and one patient died of pulmonary embolism after thoracotomy (0.5%). Patients were discharged significantly faster after VATS than after thoracotomy (p < 0.001). Complete (R0) resection was achieved in 89% of patients. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 months (95% confidence interval 7.9-14.1). During follow-up, eight (12.7%) patients in the VATS group and 42 (22.3%) patients in the thoracotomy group experienced recurrence (p = 0.98). The median overall survival was 61 months (95% confidence interval 46.1-75.9), and there was no significant difference with regard to the surgical method used (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: VATS metastasectomy can be considered in patients with a solitary lung metastasis. An open surgical approach with palpation of the lung showed no advantage in terms of surgical outcome or survival.

The Challenges of Using ICD codes to Perform a Comparative Analysis between Patients with Penetrating Cardiac Injuries who Underwent Non-Resuscitative Thoracotomy versus Sternotomy.

Background: Comparative morbidity after either sternotomy or non-resuscitative thoracotomy in penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) is unknown. Methods: Retrospective review of adults with PCI who underwent either sternotomy or non-resuscitative thoracotomy using the National Trauma Data Bank 2007-2015. Since there is no unique International Classification of Diseases Procedure Coding System (ICD-PCS) codes assigned for resuscitative vs. non-resuscitative thoracotomy, and both procedures were coded as "thoracotomy", propensity score (PS) methods were applied to avoid inclusion of resuscitative thoracotomy. Results: Despite well PS matching on injury severity score the non-thoracotomy group compared to the sternotomy group had a significantly increased risk of mortality (30 percent vs 8 percent, p<0.0001). The morbidity differed as well-25 percent vs. 12 percent, p=0.0007. Conclusions: The differences in mortality in PCI patients who underwent non-resuscitative thoracotomy vs. sternotomy may be biased by unintentional inclusion of resuscitative thoracotomy. To accurately capture thoracotomy type, separate unique resuscitative and non-resuscitative thoracotomy procedure codes should be created in future revisions of the ICD PCS.

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the outcomes of open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To discern the impact of depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the outcomes of open descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) repair. METHODS: Restricted cubic spline analysis was used to identify a threshold of LVEF, which corresponded to an increase in operative mortality and major adverse events (MAE: operative death, myocardial infarction, stroke, spinal cord injury, need for tracheostomy or dialysis). Logistic and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors of MAE, operative mortality, and survival. RESULTS: DTA/TAAA repair was performed in 833 patients between 1997 and 2018. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that patients with LVEF <40% (n = 66) had an increased risk of MAE (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-3.87; P < .01) and operative mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.21-6.12; P = .02) compared with the group with LVEF ≥40% (n = 767). The group with LVEF <40% had a worse preoperative profile (eg, coronary revascularization, 48.5% vs 17.3% [P < .01]; valvular disease, 82.8% vs 49.39% [P < .01]; renal insufficiency, 45.5% vs 26.1% [P < .01]; respiratory insufficiency, 36.4% vs 21.2% [P = .01]) and worse long-term survival (35.5% vs 44.7% at 10 years; P = .01). Nonetheless, on multivariate regression, depressed LVEF was not an independent predictor of operative mortality, MAE, or survival. CONCLUSIONS: LVEF is not an independent predictor of adverse events in surgery for DTA.

Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with thoracotomy in bronchial sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the adequacy of bronchial sleeve lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in perioperative outcomes and its oncological efficacy by comparing with thoracotomy in a balanced population. METHODS: A total of 363 patients who received bronchial sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer from January 2013 to December 2017 were included and placed in the thoracotomy (n = 251) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 112) groups. Statistical analyses were performed to compare patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes, and survival between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 116 thoracotomy cases were matched with 72 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases by propensity score. Compared with thoracotomy, patients in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group after matching had less intraoperative blood loss (P < .01) and length of postoperative hospital stay (P < .01), duration of chest tube drainage (P < .01), and intensive care unit stay (P = .03) despite comparable operative time, complication rate, and 30- to 90-day mortality rate. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival were similar in patients who received sleeve lobectomy by thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (log-rank, P = .24 and .20, respectively) at 3 years. Although advanced TNM stage was independently associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival in multivariable analysis, older age was only predictive for worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = .02). Body mass index was also found be a predictive factor (overall survival: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99, P = .03; recurrence-free survival: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection and continued experience, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery appears to be safe in the short-term perioperative period and does not appear to comprise oncologic outcomes in performing sleeve lobectomy.

Outcomes after Contralateral Anatomic Surgical Resection in Multiple Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated surgically for lung cancer may present synchronous or metachronous lung cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after a second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective two-center study, based on a prospective indexed database. Included patients were treated surgically by bilateral anatomic surgical resection for a second primary lung cancer. We excluded nonanatomic resections, benign lesions, and ipsilateral second surgical resections. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and September 2018, 55 patients underwent contralateral anatomic surgical resections for lung cancer, mostly for metachronous cancers. The first surgical resection was a lobectomy in most cases (45 lobectomies: 81.8%, 9 segmentectomies: 16.4%, and 1 bilobectomy: 1.8%), and a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedure was used in 23 cases (41.8%). The mean interval between the operations was 38 months, and lobectomy was less frequent for the second surgical resection (35 lobectomies: 63.6% and 20 segmentectomies: 36.4%), with VATS procedures performed in 41 cases (74.5%). Ninety-day mortality was 10.9% (n = 6), and 3-year survival was 77%. Risk factor analysis identified the number of resected segments during the second intervention or the total number of resected segments, extent of resection (lobectomy vs. segmentectomy), surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. VATS), tumor stage, and nodal involvement as potential prognostic factors for long-term survival. CONCLUSION: A second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for multiple primary lung cancer is possible, with a higher early mortality rate, but acceptable long-term survival, and should be indicated for carefully selected patients.

Evaluating Giant Hydatid Cysts: Factors Affecting Mortality and Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent surgery for giant pulmonary hydatid cysts in our center. METHODS: Data from 283 patients who underwent surgery in our center for pulmonary hydatid cyst between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Cysts 10 cm in diameter or larger were considered giant hydatid cysts. RESULTS: There were 145 women (51.2%) and 138 men (48.8%). Giant cyst (≥10 cm) was present in 57 patients (20.1%), while the other 226 patients (79.9%) had cysts smaller than 10 cm. Operations were performed using videothoracoscopic approach in 68 patients (24%) and with thoracotomy in 215 patients (76%). Hydatid cysts were on the left side in 129 patients (45.6%), on the right side in 143 patients (50.5%), and bilateral in 11 patients (3.9%). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 29 patients (10.2%). Use of videothoracoscopic surgical approach did not affect morbidity. The mortality rate within the first 90 days was 0.35% (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Giant cysts are more common in the young age group than in older adults. Regardless of cyst size, surgery should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis to avoid potential complications.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic safety analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly adopted as an alternative to conventional sternotomy for mitral valve pathology in many centres worldwide. A systematic safety analysis based on a comprehensive list of pre-specified 30-day complications defined by the Mitral Valve Academic Consortium (MVARC) criteria is lacking. The aim of the current study was to systematically analyse the safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in our centre based on the MVARC definitions. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right mini-thoracotomy in our institution within 10 years were studied retrospectively. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day major complications based on MVARC definitions. RESULTS: 745 patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (507 repair, 238 replacement), with a mean age of 62.9±12.3 years. The repair was successful in 95.8%. Overall 30-day mortality was 1.2% and stroke rate 0.3%. Freedom from any 30-day major complications was 87.2%, and independent predictors were left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.17 to 3.26). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe technique and is associated with low 30-day mortality and stroke rate.

Operative invasiveness does not affect the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between operative invasiveness and the prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have undergone surgery has been controversial. METHODS: Clinical data were analyzed for 463 NSCLC patients. Operative invasiveness was defined by wound length, operation time, and the postoperative C-reactive protein (postCRP) level. The operative approach was divided into video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy. RESULTS: The wound length and operation time were significantly correlated with the postCRP level (correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.39, p <  0.01; CC = 0.54, p <  0.01, respectively). The postCRP level in the VATS group was significantly lower than that in the thoracotomy group (12.2 mg/dl vs 20.58 mg/dl, p <  0.01). The relapse-free survival differed significantly based on wound length (p <  0.01), operation time (p = 0.01), CRP level (p <  0.01), and operative approach (p <  0.01). The carcinoembryonic antigen level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; p = 0.02), pathological stage (pStage) (HR, 2.57; p <  0.01), vascular invasion (HR, 1.95; p = 0.01), and preoperative CRP level (preCRP) (HR, 1.91; p <  0.01) were identified as significant prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in a multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed that smoking history (HR, 2.36; p = 0.03), pStage (HR, 3.26; p <  0.01), and preCRP level were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRP level was associated with poor prognosis. Although the VATS approach might be less invasive procedure for NSCLC patients, operative invasiveness does not affect the prognosis.

Does Clamshell Thoracotomy Better Facilitate Thoracic Life-Saving Procedures Without Increased Complication Compared with an Anterolateral Approach to Resuscitative Thoracotomy? Results from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is life-saving in select patients and can be accomplished through a left anterolateral (AT) or clamshell thoracotomy (CT). CT may provide additional exposure, facilitating certain operative procedures, but the added blood and heat loss and time to perform it may increase complications. No prospective multicenter comparison of techniques has yet been reported. STUDY DESIGN: The observational AAST Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute care surgery (AORTA) registry was used to compare AT and CT in RT. RESULTS: AORTA recorded 1,218 RTs at 46 trauma centers from June 2014 to January 2020. Overall survival after RT was 6.0% (AT 6.6%; [59 of 900]; CT 4.2% [13 of 296], p = 0.132). Among all RTs, 11.1% (142 of 1,278) surviving at least 24 hours were used tocompare AT (112) and CT (30). There was no difference between the 2 groups withregard to age, sex, Injury Severity Score, or mechanism of injury (Table 1). CT was significantly more likely to be used in patients needing resection of the lung or cardiac repair. CT was not associated with increased local thoracic/systemic complications, higher transfusion requirement, or greater ventilator, ICU, or hospital days compared with AT. CONCLUSIONS: Clamshell thoracotomy facilitates thoracic life-saving procedures withoutincreased systemic or thoracic complications compared with AT in patients undergoing RT.

Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy is a demanding operation that can be performed by different approaches including open surgery or a combination of minimal access techniques. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of open, minimally invasive and robotic oesophagectomy techniques for oesophageal cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting open oesophagectomy, laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO), thoracoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (TAO), totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) or robotic MIO (RAMIO) for oesophagectomy. A network meta-analysis of intraoperative (operating time, blood loss), postoperative (overall complications, anastomotic leaks, chyle leak, duration of hospital stay) and oncological (R0 resection, lymphadenectomy) outcomes, and survival was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight studies involving 32 315 patients were included in the network meta-analysis (open 17 824, 55·2 per cent; LAO 1576, 4·9 per cent; TAO 2421 7·5 per cent; MIO 9558, 29·6 per cent; RAMIO 917, 2·8 per cent). Compared with open oesophagectomy, both MIO and RAMIO were associated with less blood loss, significantly lower rates of pulmonary complications, shorter duration of stay and higher lymph node yield. There were no significant differences between surgical techniques in surgical-site infections, chyle leak, and 30- and 90-day mortality. MIO and RAMIO had better 1- and 5-year survival rates respectively compared with open surgery. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive and robotic techniques for oesophagectomy are associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay, with no compromise of oncological outcomes but no improvement in perioperative mortality.

ANTECEDENTES: La esofaguectomía es una operación muy exigente que puede ser realizada a través de diferentes abordajes que incluyen la cirugía abierta o una combinación de técnicas con acceso mínimamente invasivo. Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis en red se propuso evaluar los resultados clínicos de la esofaguectomía abierta y de las técnicas de esofaguectomía mínimamente invasiva y robótica para el cáncer de esófago. MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda sistemática de la bibliografía de estudios que describiesen esofaguectomía abierta, esofaguectomía asistida por laparoscopia (laparoscopic assisted oesophagectomy, LAO), esofaguectomía asistida por toracoscopia (thoracoscopic assisted oesophagectomy, TAO), esofaguectomía totalmente mínimamente invasiva (totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy, MIO) o MIO robótica (RAMIO). Se realizó un mataanálisis en red de resultados intraoperatorios (tiempo operatorio, pérdida de sangre), postoperatorios (complicaciones globales, fuga anastomótica, quilotórax, duración estancia hospitalaria), oncológicos (resección R0, linfadenectomía) y supervivencia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 98 estudios con 32.296 pacientes en el metaanálisis en red (abierta: n = 17.824, 55%; LAO: n = 1.576, 5%; TAO: n = 2.421, 7%; MIO: n = 9.558, 30%; RAMIO: n = 917, 3%). En comparación con la vía abierta, tanto MIO y RAMIO se asociaron con menos pérdidas hemáticas, tasas significativamente menores de complicaciones pulmonares, estancia más corta y obtención de un mayor número de ganglos linfáticos. No hubo diferencias significativas entre las técnicas quirúrgicas en las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico, quilotórax y mortalidad a los 30 y 90 días. MIO y RAMIO se asociaron con mejores tasas de supervivencia a 1 y 5 años respectivamente, en comparación con la cirugía abierta. CONCLUSIÓN: Las técnicas mínimamente invasivas y robótica para la esofaguectomía se asociaron con menor morbilidad postoperatoria y estancia hospitalaria, sin comprometer los resultados oncológicos, pero sin mejoría en la mortalidad perioperatoria.

Is it safe to move away from a full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical approaches have gained popularity among patients and surgeons. The aim of this project was to assess the safety of initiating aortic valve replacement via an anterior right thoracotomy program. METHODS: Between May 2015 and May 2019, data of all isolated primary aortic valve replacements were extracted retrospectively from our prospectively collected database and categorized into conventional median sternotomy, hemisternotomy, and anterior right thoracotomy cases. In total, 661 patients underwent isolated primary aortic valve replacement, of whom 429 (65%) had a median sternotomy, 126 (19%) had a hemisternotomy, and 106 (16%) had an anterior right thoracotomy. Preoperative characteristics were similar in each of the three groups. Statistical testing of the surgical groups was undertaken using the chi-square test for categorical variables and one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc pairwise tests (where appropriate) for continuous variables, to identify differences between pairs of data. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times were significantly longer in the anterior right thoracotomy group compared to the hemisternotomy and median sternotomy groups (p < 0.001). Blood loss was significantly less and hospital stay significantly shorter in the hemisternotomy group compared to median sternotomy group but not the anterior right thoracotomy group. Mortality, stroke, renal, gastrointestinal and respiratory complications showed no statistical differences. CONCLUSION: Surgical aortic valve replacement had a very low mortality and morbidity in our experience, and it is safe to start a minimal access program for aortic valve replacement.

Less Invasive Approach to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation May Improve Survival in High-Risk Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvement in outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation over the past 2 decades, high-risk recipients continue to have a prohibitive rate of morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that a less invasive approach to LVAD implantation would be associated with improved survival compared to a conventional approach in this high-risk cohort. METHODS: All consecutive LVAD recipients (2013 to 2017) that underwent centrifugal LVAD implantation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified as high-risk if INTERMACS 1 or required temporary VAD/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prior to durable VAD implantation. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: left thoracotomy with hemi-sternotomy (LTHS) high-risk, conventional sternotomy (CS) high-risk, and non-high-risk. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (LTHS high-risk: 11, CS high-risk: 12, non-high-risk: 34) were identified. Preoperative right ventricular failure scores, HeartMate-II mortality scores, and end-organ dysfunction were similar between the 2 high-risk groups. While operative time was similar between the 3 groups, cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the LTHS high-risk group compared to other groups. There was a trend toward decreased intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator time in LTHS high-risk compared to CS high-risk patients. Moreover, between these 2 groups, there was a significant decrease in temporary right VAD support (50% vs 0%, P = 0.014), and 1-year survival was significantly higher in the LTHS group (42% vs 91%, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive LVAD implantation appears to be associated with improved survival compared to conventional LVAD implantation in high-risk patients.

[Short-term results of video-assisted lung cancer surgery in octogenarians]. / Morbi-mortalité de la résection pulmonaire pour cancer par chirurgie vidéo-assistée chez l'octogénaire.

INTRODUCTION: Due to an increase in life expectancy, onco-pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons are more frequently faced with octogenarian patients with lung cancer. In this age group, treatment modalities may need to be revised because of the increasing presence of comorbidities. Surgery remains the reference treatment for early stage disease, but mortality rates and postoperative complications are higher in this group of patients. One of the solutions to reduce the operative risk would be to develop videoassisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of this form of lung cancer surgery in octogenarians. METHODS: All patients 80 years old or more who underwent videoassisted lung cancer surgery from 2014 to 2018 at Lyon University Hospital were included. Wedge resections and diagnostic procedures were excluded. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (13 men, 6 women) were included. The median age was 82 years old. All patients had undergone videoassisted lobectomy. Three patients required conversion to thoracotomy (15.8%). All patients underwent complete resection (R0). One patient had N1 lymph node involvement, all others were N0. The postoperative complication rate was 68.4%, the majority of which were grade II of the Clavien classification. Perioperative mortality was 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Videoassisted lung cancer resection in a selected population of octogenarians is associated with satisfactory short-term results. It is reasonable to favour minimally invasive techniques in this population, even if the proof of their superiority has not yet been firmly established.

Impact of Surgical Approach in Double Lung Transplantation: Median Sternotomy vs Clamshell Thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Double lung transplantation (DLT) remains the gold standard for end-stage lung disease. Although DLT was historically performed via clamshell thoracotomy, recently the median sternotomy has emerged as a viable alternative. As the ideal surgical approach remains unclear, the aim of our study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of these 2 surgical approaches in DLT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 192 consecutive adult patients who underwent primary DLT at our institution between 2012 and 2017 (sternotomy, n = 147; clamshell, n = 45). The impact of each surgical approach on post-transplant morbidity was investigated, and the overall survival probability analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recipients' baseline and donors' characteristics and bilateral allograft ischemic time. Freedom from primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection episodes, postoperative prolonged ventilator support, tracheostomy, postoperative stroke, and airway dehiscence were comparable between these 2 groups. The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and operative time were significantly longer in the clamshell thoracotomy group. Postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation usage tended to be more frequent in the clamshell thoracotomy group than the median sternotomy group, despite no statistical significance. Length of hospital and intensive care unit stay were not influenced by the type of incision. There was no significant difference in overall survival between these 2 procedure groups (P = .61, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The median sternotomy approach in DLT decreases operative time and more importantly leads to a shorter duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. The type of surgical approach did not show any statistically significant impact on adult DLT recipients' morbidity and survival.

Long-Term Outcomes of Right Minithoracotomy Versus Hemisternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair has been increasingly adopted. Right minithoracotomy (RT) and lower hemisternotomy (HS) have each been associated with improved short-term outcomes; however, these approaches have not been directly compared to each other. The aim of this study was to compare long-term survival and durability of 2 minimally invasive approaches to mitral repair. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all isolated mitral repairs performed via RT or HS between October 1997 and June 2018; 100 RT cases and 719 HS cases were included. Outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, long-term survival, and freedom from mitral reoperation. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare RT and HS to a reference cohort of full-sternotomy cases. Total observation time was 9,901 patient-years and mean follow-up time was 12.2 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 58±12 years in the RT group and 56±13 years in the HS group (P = 0.2). The RT group had longer bypass (143 minutes vs. 112 minutes; P < 0.001) and cross-clamp times (99 minutes vs. 78 minutes; P < 0.001) compared with the HS group. There were no differences in operative mortality or 30-day outcomes. Survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 99% (96-100), 92% (85-100), and 69% (30-100) in the RT group and 98% (97-99), 92% (90-94), and 89% (86-92) for HS (P < 0.9). There were no differences in risk-adjusted survival between RT, HS and full sternotomy. No long-term mitral reoperations occurred in the RT group and 8 (1%) occurred in the HS group (P < 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair can be performed safely through RT or HS with excellent survival and durability at 15 years.

Predictors of Stroke After Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Without the Cross-Clamp.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVS) with hypothermic fibrillatory arrest has been associated with an increased risk of stroke. We aim to investigate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of stroke in a large cohort of patient who underwent clampless mini-MVS. Between January 2008 and June 2017, we performed 1247 mini-MVSs. The clinical, operative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify predictors of postoperative stroke. The median follow-up was 5.2 years (interquartile range 2.6-7.5). The etiology of mitral valve (MV) disease was degenerative (60.4%, n = 753), functional (12.8%, n = 160), rheumatic (8.7%, n = 109), endocarditis (3.1%, n = 39), and reoperative MV surgery (14.9%, n = 186). The overall incidence of postoperative neurologic event was 2.5% (n = 31/1247). Univariable predictors of stroke were a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk (6.0 ± 11.8% vs 3.3 ± 5.2%, P < 0.001), advanced age, (69.6 ± 12.1 years vs 63.0 ± 13.6 years, P = 0.002), female gender (71.0% vs 46.3%, P = 0.007), and a history of a cerebrovascular accident (22.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.008). Stroke patients had a higher 30-day mortality (22.6% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001) and a higher risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 5.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-9.6, P < 0.001). Advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.0; P = 0.02), female gender (OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.9-5.2; P = 0.05), and history of cerebrovascular accident (OR 3.1; 95% CI 0.98-10.1; P = 0.05) remained as independent predictors of stroke in the multivariable analysis. Our decade-long experience indicates that clampless mini-MVS is associated with a low incidence of postoperative stroke, and that the predictors of stroke are not specific to this approach.

Analysis of Discharge Destination After Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients express strong opinion regarding discharge destination, preferring discharge home vs elsewhere. As focus on patient satisfaction increases, we sought to understand differences in postoperative discharge destination after minimally invasive vs open anatomic lung resection for lung cancer to guide patient education and management and better understand the postoperative patient experience. METHODS: Procedures were identified by Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes using the 2012-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. Propensity score analysis was used to assess the relationship between the surgical approach and nonhome discharge destination (primary outcome) and postoperative complications; related, unplanned readmission; and mortality (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: A total of 17,303 patients underwent anatomic lung resection for lung cancer, including 10,121 (58.5%) minimally invasive and 7182 (41.5%) open resections. Patients undergoing open resection had 60% greater odds of nonhome discharge (P < .001), 58% greater odds of postoperative mortality (P = .003), 36% greater odds of postoperative complication (P < .001), and 17% greater odds of readmission (P = .04) compared with patients undergoing minimally invasive resection. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach to lung resection for lung cancer offers patients a more desirable patient-centered postoperative experience, as well as more favorable clinical outcomes, and should be favored when feasible.

Minithoracotomy and Beating Heart Strategy for Mitral Surgery in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with low ejection fraction or previous heart surgery, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp (MIMVS-WAC) has shown promising results. We report our experience for this strategy in our centers. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2017, 46 patients (mean age 69 ± 11 years, 76% males) received MIMVS-WAC. Indications for this technique were prior coronary bypass surgery (26%), severe or recent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (30%), or both (39%). The mean EuroSCORE II was 12 ± 10. RESULTS: For each procedure, we conducted right minithoracotomy and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after peripheral cannulation. Mean CPB time was 159 ± 39 minutes. A mitral valve replacement (MVR) was performed in 23 cases (50%), an annuloplasty in 22 cases (48%), and a prosthesis pannus removal in 1 case (2%). Mean hospital length of stay was 12 ± 5.4 days. We report no sternotomy conversions, six reoperations for bleeding, and three deaths at 30 days. Transfusion was requested in 62% (mean infusion 2 ± 2.4 packed red blood cells). The postoperative echocardiography showed an LV function preservation in 69% of cases and a reduction of pulmonary arterial pressure in 73% of cases. Four additional deaths occurred in the long-term follow-up (mean 637 ± 381 days, median 593 days). No mitral reoperation was required, with a MR ≤ 2 in 90% of patients. CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, the MIMVS-WAC is a safe technique. It avoids hard dissections while ensuring excellent preservation of cardiac function.

Surgical repair of cervical aortic arch: An alternative classification scheme based on experience in 35 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical aortic arch (CAA) is rare and difficult to repair. Clinical experience is limited. We report the surgical techniques and midterm outcomes in 35 patients with CAA based on an alternative classification scheme. METHODS: Of 35 patients with CAA, 30 (85.7%) had left-sided aortic arch and 5 had (14.3%) right-sided aortic arch (all 5 had a vascular ring). Mean age was 34.2 ± 13.1 years, 23 were female (65.7%), and 18 were asymptomatic (51.4%). Surgical access and procedure were chosen according to an alternative classification scheme that is based on the presence or absence of vascular ring and relationship of descending aorta to the side of the aortic arch. In the left-sided aortic arch group, aortic arch reconstruction though median sternotomy was performed in 15 patients, and distal arch and descending thoracic aortic replacement via left thoracotomy in 15 patients. In the right-sided aortic arch group, ascending-to-descending aortic bypass was done via median sternotomy in 2 patients and right thoracotomy in 1, and distal arch and descending thoracic aortic replacement via right thoracotomy in 2 patients. RESULTS: Neither death nor spinal cord injury occurred. Left recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, prolonged ventilation, and reexploration for bleeding occurred in 1 each. In 11 patients with coarctation, the upper-lower limb gradient decreased significantly postoperatively (from 34.0 ± 12.7 to 10.2 ± 2.7 mm Hg; P < .01). The diseased aortic segment was excluded in 34 patients, except 1 with residual aneurysm in the proximal descending thoracic aorta. Follow-up was complete in 100% at mean 4.4 ± 2.0 years. No late death, limb ischemia, or stroke occurred. Endovascular repair was performed in 1 patient, and ascending aortic dilation occurred in 1 patient. The residual aorta remained nondilated in 33 patients. Aortic grafts were patent in 100%, with no anastomotic leak or pseudoaneurysm. At 6 years, the incidences of death, aortic events, and event-free survival were 0%, 6.5%, and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair of CAA can achieve favorable early and midterm outcomes. Surgical accesses and procedures should be chosen based on type of CAA, anatomic variations and associated anomalies. Our alternative categorization scheme of CAA is intuitive and comprehensive, which may facilitate classification and surgical decision making.

Propensity-Matched Comparison of Two Different Access Modes for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.

Mitral valve surgery is being performed routinely using minimally invasive operative techniques. We aimed comparing perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using 2 different surgical approaches, partial upper sternotomy (PUS) vs right anterolateral minithoracotomy (RAT). From January 1998 through December 2015, 1006 patients underwent mitral valve surgery using a minimally invasive access in our institution. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify covariates among 18 patient variables including the type of mitral valve surgery. Using the significant regression coefficients, each patient's propensity score was calculated, allowing selectively matched subgroups of 243 patients each. Results are based on the matched cohorts between the 2 groups. The PUS approach was performed by 8 surgeons whereas the RAT approach by 2. PUS led to slightly longer duration of the cross-clamp time (100 ± 28 vs 88 ± 26 minutes, P < 0.001) whereas ventilation time (9 ± 37 vs 11 ± 66 hours, P < 0.001) was shorter in PUS than in RAT group. Besides the number of pacemaker implants (PUS: 6.6% vs RAT: 0.4, P = 0.0005) and postoperative chest tube drainage amount at 24 hours (PUS: 556 ± 557 mL/24 h vs RAT: 716 ± 580 mL/24 h, P < 0.001) no differences between the 2 groups regarding further perioperative outcome were observed. Long-term survival and freedom from mitral valve reintervention were comparable between the 2 groups at 6- and 8 years' follow-up. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a PUS or RAT approach without any differences regarding perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality. Although the RAT approach may be cosmetically more appealing in female patients, PUS may facilitate both safe performance of mitral valve surgery and resident training.