The rationale behind grafting haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells.

The ability to perform hematopoietic cell transplant across major histocompatibility complex barriers can dramatically increase the availability of donors and allow more patients across the world to pursue curative transplant procedures for underlying hematologic disorders. Early attempts at haploidentical transplantation using broadly reactive T-cell depletion approaches were compromised by graft rejection, graft-versus-host disease and prolonged immune deficiency. The evolution of haploidentical transplantation focused on expanding transplanted hematopoietic progenitors as well as using less broadly reactive T-cell depletion. Significant outcome improvements were identified with technology advances allowing selective depletion of donor allospecific T cells, initially ex-vivo with evolution to its current in-vivo approach with the infusion of the highly immunosuppressive chemotherapy agent, cyclophosphamide after transplantation procedure. Current approaches are facile and portable, allowing expansion of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients across the world, including previously underserved populations.

Haploidentical and matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offer similar survival outcomes for acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) has emerged as an effective approach for acute leukemia, primarily due to the inherent difficulty in finding human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors (MUD). Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether haplo-HSCT and MUD-HSCT can provide comparable outcomes in patients with acute leukemia. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) outcomes between the MUD-HSCT and haplo-HSCT groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective analysis encompassed adult patients with acute leukemia undergoing the initial allo-HSCT. Among these 85 patients, we stratified 33 patients into the MUD-HSCT group and 52 to the haplo-HSCT group. The primary outcomes were OS and LFS. The median OS was not reached in the haplo-HSCT group, while it reached 29.8 months in patients undergoing MUD-HSCT (p = .211). Likewise, the median LFS periods were 52.6 months in the haplo-HSCT group and 12.7 months in the MUD-HSCT group (p = .212). Importantly, neither the OS nor LFS showed substantial differences between the MUD-HSCT and haplo-HSCT groups. Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed that haplo-HSCT did not demonstrate a significantly higher risk of worse LFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.25; p = .216) or OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-1.26; p = .214) than MUD-HSCT. Notably, a high European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.87; p = .007) and non-complete remission (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.17-5.23; p = .017) were significantly correlated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: Haplo-HSCT may serve as an alternative to MUD-HSCT for the treatment of acute leukemia, offering similar survival outcomes.

The history of haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a trip from the bench to the bedside.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is a curative intervention for both neoplastic and non-malignant conditions. However, not all patients have an HLA-matched donor. Therefore, the development of an approach that expand the donor pool was of paramount relevance. The development of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as graft versus host disease prophylaxis allows the safe use of haploidentical donors, solving the donor availability problem to the vast majority of patients in need. The present paper reviews the history of the development of haploidentical transplantation at Johns Hopkins University, from the bench to the bedside.

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using HLA-haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched sibling donor for lymphoma.

Data comparing HLA-haploidentical donors and HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for lymphoma are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 465 patients with lymphoma aged 16 years or older who underwent PBSCT using haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) (n = 166) or MSDs with calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (n = 299). Two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the PTCy-haplo and MSD groups were 49.2% versus 51.9% (P = 0.64), 38.0% versus 39.9% (P = 0.97), and 27.7% versus 18.5% (P = 0.006), respectively. In multivariable analyses, PTCy-haplo recipients had slower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < 0.001) and platelet recovery (HR, 0.54; P < 0.001), lower risk of chronic GVHD (HR, 0.64; P = 0.038) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.45; P = 0.008), and better GRFS (HR, 0.66; P = 0.003) than MSD transplant recipients. OS, PFS, relapse or progression, and non-relapse mortality were similar between the groups. The difference might be mainly due to PTCy use rather than donor type; however, the results suggested that PTCy-haplo could be a possible option as an alternative to conventional MSD transplantation for lymphoma in PBSCT.

First complete remission favours haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide over cord blood transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

To assess the benefits of HLA-haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) relative to those of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), we analysed 1999 patients (PTCy-haplo, 330; UCB, 1669), using the nationwide Japanese registry. PTCy-haplo was associated with a significantly higher relapse rate, but lower non-relapse mortality, which results in overall survival and disease-free survival, comparable to those of UCB. Among patients in CR1, PTCy-haplo showed a significantly higher survival than UCB regardless of the CD34+ cell dose. Our findings provide valuable insights into the donor selection algorithm in allogeneic HSCT for adult patients with ALL.

Influence of ATLG serum levels on CD3/CD19-depleted hematopoietic grafts and on immune recovery in pediatric haplo-HSCT.

ABSTRACT: Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) significantly reduces the risk of engraftment failure in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) but hampers posttransplant immune reconstitution. We hypothesized that in patients receiving haploidentical CD3/CD19-depleted grafts, these double-edged effects could be better balanced by attaining high ATLG serum concentrations before transplant but as low as possible on the day of transplant. Therefore, we moved the start of ATLG application to day -12 and determined serum concentrations of T-cell-specific ATLG in pediatric patients treated with 3 established dosing regimens (15, 30, or 60 mg/kg). Corresponding mean T-cell-specific ATLG serum concentrations at day 0 were 1.14, 2.99, or 12.10 µg/mL, respectively. Higher ATLG doses correlated with higher peak levels at days -8 and -7 and reduced graft rejection, whereas lower ATLG doses correlated with significantly faster posttransplant recovery of T and natural killer cells. The rate of graft-versus-host disease remained low, independent of ATLG doses. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that ATLG concentrations of 2.0 µg/mL and lower only slightly reduced the activity of natural killer cells, and therefore, the function of such effector cells might be preserved in the grafts. Pharmacokinetic analysis, compatible with linear first-order kinetics, revealed similar half-life values, independent of ATLG doses. Hence, the day on which a desired ATLG serum level is reached can be calculated before HSCT. Our retrospective study demonstrates the relevance of dosing and time of administration of ATLG on engraftment and immune recovery in ex vivo CD3/CD19-depleted haploidentical HSCT.

Non-T-depleted haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in patients with secondary versus de novo AML in first complete remission: a study from the ALWP/EBMT.

We compared outcomes of adult patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) versus de novo AML after non-T-depleted haploidentical stem cell transplant (HaploSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Seventeen hundred and eleven AML patients (sAML-231, de novo-1480) in first complete remission transplanted from 2010 to 2021, were included. Patients with de novo AML were younger, median age 55.8 versus 60.8 years, p < 0.0001, had better transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3 21.3% versus 40.8%, p < 0.0001 and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) with KPS ≥ 90 in 78% versus 68.5%, respectively, p = 0.002. The two patient groups did not differ with respect to gender, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and cell source. Median time from diagnosis to HaploSCT was 5.2 versus 4.9 months, respectively, p = 0.005. Fewer sAML patients received myeloablative conditioning 35.1% versus 50.1%, p < 0.0001. Two hundred and eleven sAML and 410 de novo AML patients were included in the matched-pair analysis matching two de novo AML with each sAML. No significant difference was observed in any transplantation outcome parameter between the sAML versus de novo AML groups. Two-year non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence did not differ with HaploSCT for de novo versus sAML; 21.4% versus 21%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.98, p = 0.9 and 23.4% versus 20.6%, HR = 0.92, p = 0.67, respectively. Two-year leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival were also not different between the de novo AML and sAML groups 55.2% versus 58.4%, HR = 0.95, p = 0.67; 61.4% versus 66.4%, HR = 0.91, p = 0.51 and 46.3% versus 48.2%, HR = 0.92, p = 0.48, respectively. Similarly, the incidence of engraftment as well as acute and chronic GVHD was similar between the 2 cohorts. In conclusion, HaploSCT with PTCy may be able to overcome the bad prognosis of sAML as results are not significantly different to those of HaploSCT in de novo AML.

Long-term follow-up of haploidentical transplantation in relapsed/refractory severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter prospective study.

In recent decades, haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) to treat severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has achieved remarkable progress. However, long-term results are still lacking. We conducted a multicenter prospective study involving SAA patients who underwent haplo-SCT as salvage therapy. Long-term outcomes were assessed, mainly focusing on survival and quality of life (QoL). Longitudinal QoL was prospectively evaluated during pretransplantation and at 3 and 5 years posttransplantation using the SF-36 scale in adults and the PedsQL 4.0 scale in children. A total of 287 SAA patients were enrolled, and the median follow-up was 4.56 years (range, 3.01-9.05 years) among surviving patients. During the long-term follow-up, 268 of 275 evaluable patients (97.5%) obtained sustained full donor chimerism, and 93.4% had complete hematopoietic recovery. The estimated overall survival and failure-free survival for the whole cohort at 9 years were 85.4% ± 2.1% and 84.0% ± 2.2%, respectively. Age (≥18 years) and a poorer performance status (ECOG >1) were identified as risk factors for survival outcomes. For QoL recovery after haplo-SCT, we found that QoL progressively improved from pretransplantation to the 3-year and 5-year time points with statistical significance. The occurrence of chronic graft versus host disease was a risk factor predicting poorer QoL scores in both the child and adult cohorts. At the last follow-up, 74.0% of children and 72.9% of adults returned to normal school or work. These inspiring long-term outcomes suggest that salvage transplantation with haploidentical donors can be routine practice for SAA patients without human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors.

Haploidentical transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia effect than HLA-matched sibling transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to compare the GVL effect between HID and MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL. METHODS: This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Immunosuppressant withdrawal and prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were administered in patients without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to prevent relapse. All patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity posttransplantation (post-MRD+) or non-remission (NR) pre-transplantation received prophylactic/pre-emptive interventions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-MRD+. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients with Ph- high-risk B-ALL were enrolled, including 145 and 190, respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of post-MRD+ was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.2%-34.7%) and 42.6% (35.5%-49.6%) in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.003), respectively. A total of 156 patients received DLI, including 60 (41.4%) and 96 (50.5%), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.096). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.6% (95% CI: 12.7%-25.4%) and 25.9% (19.9%-32.3%; P = 0.116) in the two groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67.4% (95% CI: 59.1%-74.4%) and 61.6% (54.2%-68.1%; P = 0.382), leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0%-70.7%) and 58.2% (50.8%-64.9%; P = 0.429), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.7% (95% CI: 43.3%-59.5%) and 37.8% (30.9%-44.6%; P = 0.041), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. CONCLUSION: HID transplantation has a lower incidence of post-MRD+ than MSD transplantation, suggesting that HID transplantation might have a superior GVL effect than MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01883180, NCT02673008.

Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012.

We previously reported the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1101, a randomized comparison of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) performed with double umbilical cord blood units (dUCB) or with haploidentical bone marrow (haplo-BMT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting. Those results showed similar progression-free survival in the 2 treatment groups but lower nonrelapse mortality and better overall survival in the haplo-BM arm. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate whether transplantation center's previous experience with haplo-BM and/or dUCB HCT had an impact on outcomes. All patients randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. Center experience was assigned based on the number of transplantations with each platform performed in the year before initiation of the study according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Centers were then classified as a dUCB center (>10 dUCB HCTs; n = 117 patients, 10 centers), a haplo-BM center (>10 haplo-BM HCTs and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 110 patients, 2 centers), or other center (≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 140 patients, 21 centers). After adjusting for age, Karnofsky Performance Status, and Disease Risk Index, we found that haplo-BM centers had lower overall mortality with this donor type compared with dUCB centers (hazard ratio [HR], 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 4.56). In contrast, there were no differences in overall mortality between haplo-BM and dUCB in centers that were experienced with dUCB HCT (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, .59 to 1.79) or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo-BM HCT (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, .83 to 2.21). The higher risk of treatment failure and overall mortality in dUCB HCT in haplo BM-experienced centers was driven by a significantly higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.97). With the exception of worse outcomes among dUCB HCT recipients in haplo-BM centers, transplantation center experience in the year before initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had a limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial.

Mother Donors Improve Outcomes after HLA Haploidentical Transplantation: A Study by the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Transplacental trafficking of maternal and fetal cells during pregnancy establishes long-term reciprocal microchimerism in both mother and child. Consequently, the maternal immune system may become sensitized to paternal histocompatibility antigens. It has been hypothesized that mother's "exposure" to paternal HLA haplotype antigens during pregnancy may affect the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) when the mother serves as a donor for the child. In T cell-depleted HLA haploidentical HSCT, maternal donors have been associated with improved transplantation outcomes. The present retrospective multicenter study, conducted on behalf of the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, involved 409 patients (102 pediatric and 307 adult) with acute leukemia who underwent HLA-haploidentical HSCT. The goal of the study was to evaluate the role of maternal donors in a large cohort of haploidentical transplantation recipients. Transplantation from maternal donors was associated with a lower relapse incidence in T cell-depleted HSCTs (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 3.92; P = .018) as well as in a limited series of unmanipulated in vivo T cell-depleted HSCTs (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 0.94 to 18.35; P = .06), along with better graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) in T cell-depleted HSCT (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.73; P = .04). These results indicate that the mother is the preferred donor to provide better GRFS in T cell-depleted HLA-haploidentical HSCT for acute leukemia.

High plasma IL-6 levels following haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation post-transplant cyclophosphamide as predictor of early death and worse outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) can be used as an alternative procedure in the absence of HLA-compatible donors. The use of high doses of cyclophosphamide after infusion improves the prognosis and eliminates the need for T cell depletion in vivo. Among the main complications of haplo-HSCT are acute graft-versus-host disease (a-GVHD) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This is a systemic inflammatory response that leads to the release of inflammatory proteins, including IL-6. This syndrome has several clinical features, with mild to severe symptoms. This study aimed to compare plasma IL-6 levels in patients submitted to different HSCT types and to associate them with the presence of acute graft versus host disease (a-GVHD), CRS and survival. METHODS: A total of 84 patients (22 haploidentical and 62 non-haploidentical) were evaluated at different times. The IL-6 levels in haplo and non-haplo-HSCT recipients were measured before transplantation and on days D7, D14, D28, D60, and D100. RESULTS: IL-6 levels were higher in haplo-HSCT recipients than in non-haplo-HSCT recipients, remaining elevated from D14 until D100 (P = 0.006) and a cut-off ≥11 pg/mL on D7, which is related to worse overall survival. In our study, we found no association with a-GVHD (P = 0.239), a common complication of this type of transplant, but we found a relationship between the increase in IL-6 and CRS (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: IL6 can be used as a biomarker for patients submitted to haplo-HSCT, allowing clinical interference in patients having levels of IL-6 times larger than normality values, avoiding early death in this group of patients.

A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Haploidentical Transplantation and Other Graft Sources in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Most likely due to the availability of potential stem cell sources, there appears to be a growing usage of haploidentical (haplo) donors for cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia involving high-risk features or relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study compared the outcomes of stem cell transplantations (SCTs) using haplo and other stem cell sources, namely, matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and cord blood transplantations (CBTs). Literature searches were conducted of the MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception to December 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were examined (17 retrospective and 11 prospective). There were no significant differences in the overall survival of haplo and those of the other stem-cell sources. For haplo versus matched donor (MSD or MUD), the pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-1.12; I2, 22%); while for haplo versus CBT, the OR was 1.24 (95% CI, 0.78-1.96; I2, 28%). The cumulative relapse incidence was significantly higher for MSD than haplo (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-0.99; I2, 48%). Both grade II-IV acute and long-term graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were significantly higher for haplo than MSD (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.15-2.74; I2, 28%; and OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.77; I2, 14%, respectively). The other clinical outcomes did not demonstrate any statistical differences. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of patients treated with haplo-SCT appear comparable with those of the SCTs using other sources. The higher probability of developing GVHD supports the need for a novel method to harness T-cell alloreactivity.

A Review of Cyclophosphamide-Induced Transplantation Tolerance in Mice and Its Relationship With the HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation/Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Platform.

The bone marrow transplantation (BMT) between haplo-identical combinations (haploBMT) could cause unacceptable bone marrow graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To cross such barriers, Johns Hopkins platform consisting of haploBMT followed by post-transplantation (PT) cyclophosphamide (Cy) has been used. Although the central mechanism of the Johns Hopkins regimen is Cy-induced tolerance with bone marrow cells (BMC) followed by Cy on days 3 and 4, the mechanisms of Cy-induced tolerance may not be well understood. Here, I review our studies in pursuing skin-tolerance from minor histocompatibility (H) antigen disparity to xenogeneic antigen disparity through fully allogeneic antigen disparity. To overcome fully allogeneic antigen barriers or xenogeneic barriers for skin grafting, pretreatment of the recipients with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against T cells before cell injection was required. In the cells-followed-by-Cy system providing successful skin tolerance, five mechanisms were identified using the correlation between super-antigens and T-cell receptor (TCR) Vß segments mainly in the H-2-identical murine combinations. Those consist of: 1) clonal destruction of antigen-stimulated-thus-proliferating mature T cells with Cy; 2) peripheral clonal deletion associated with immediate peripheral chimerism; 3) intrathymic clonal deletion associated with intrathymic chimerism; 4) delayed generation of suppressor T (Ts) cells; and 5) delayed generation of clonal anergy. These five mechanisms are insufficient to induce tolerance when the donor-recipient combinations are disparate in MHC antigens plus minor H antigens as is seen in haploBMT. Clonal destruction is incomplete when the antigenic disparity is too strong to establish intrathymic mixed chimerism. Although this incomplete clonal destruction leaves the less-proliferative, antigen-stimulated T cells behind, these cells may confer graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects after haploBMT/PTCy.

Peritransplant glucocorticoids redistribute donor T cells to the bone marrow and prevent relapse after haploidentical SCT.

Patients with acute leukemia who are unable to achieve complete remission prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) have dismal outcomes, with relapse rates well in excess of 60%. Haplo-identical SCT (haplo-SCT) may allow enhanced graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects by virtue of HLA class I/II donor-host disparities, but it typically requires intensive immunosuppression with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) to prevent lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here, we demonstrate in preclinical models that glucocorticoid administration from days -1 to +5 inhibits alloantigen presentation by professional recipient antigen presenting cells in the gastrointestinal tract and prevents donor T cell priming and subsequent expansion therein. In contrast, direct glucocorticoid signaling of donor T cells promotes chemokine and integrin signatures permissive of preferential circulation and migration into the BM, promoting donor T cell residency. This results in significant reductions in GVHD while promoting potent GVL effects; relapse in recipients receiving glucocorticoids, vehicle, or PT-Cy was 12%, 56%, and 100%, respectively. Intriguingly, patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in remission who received unmanipulated haplo-SCT and peritransplant glucocorticoids also had an unexpectedly low relapse rate at 1 year (32%; 95% CI, 18%-47%) with high overall survival at 3 years (58%; 95% CI, 38%-74%). These data highlight a potentially simple and effective approach to prevent relapse in patients with otherwise incurable leukemia that could be studied in prospective randomized trials.

HLA-haploidentical vs matched unrelated donor transplants with posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has enabled haploidentical (Haplo) transplantation to be performed with results similar to those after matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation with traditional prophylaxis. The relative value of transplantation with MUD vs Haplo donors when both groups receive PTCy/calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate GVHD prophylaxis is not known. We compared outcomes after 2036 Haplo and 284 MUD transplantations with PTCy GVHD prophylaxis for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in adults from 2011 through 2018. Cox regression models were built to compare outcomes between donor types. Recipients of myeloablative and reduced-intensity regimens were analyzed separately. Among recipients of reduced-intensity regimens, 2-year graft failure (3% vs 11%), acute grades 2 to 4 GVHD (hazards ratio [HR], 0.70; P = .022), acute grades 3 and 4 GVHD (HR, 0.41; P = .016), and nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.43; P = .0008) were lower after MUD than with Haplo donor transplantation. Consequently, disease-free (HR, 0.74; P = .008; 55% vs 41%) and overall (HR, 0.65; P = .001; 67% vs 54%) survival were higher with MUD than with Haplo transplants. Among recipients of myeloablative regimens, day-100 platelet recovery (95% vs 88%) was higher and grades 3 and 4 acute (HR, 0.39; P = .07) and chronic GVHD (HR, 0.66; P = .05) were lower after MUD than with Haplo donor transplantation. There were no differences in graft failure, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and disease-free and overall survival between donor types with myeloablative conditioning regimens. These data extend and confirm the importance of donor-recipient HLA matching for allogeneic transplantation. A MUD is the preferred donor, especially for transplantations with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

Successful haploidentical transplantation using plasma exchange and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for severe aplastic anemia patients with anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies.

Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) has emerged as a novel strategy to treat patients suffering from severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who lack matched donors due to the availability and easy access to sources of donors. Anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have been found to influence the outcome of Haplo-HSCT. Between March 2016 and March 2020, 7 SAA patients with DSAs underwent Haplo-HSCT in our center. We employed a modified protocol of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and plasma exchange aiming to decrease the levels of DSAs. All 7 patients successfully achieved hematopoietic reconstruction. The median follow-up is 31 (range, 8 to 45) months. They survived and were transfusion-independent in the absence of clonality. No occurrence of primary or secondary graft failure has been noted among any of the patients. There was no severe acute and chronic GVHD occurred. This protocol is effective for Haplo-HSCT in SAA patients with DSAs, which provides an option for the SAA patients without other alternative donor.

Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant.

Background: Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT. Methods: Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies. Results: We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%. Conclusions: Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor.

Clinical Utility of the Detection of the Loss of the Mismatched HLA in Relapsed Hematological Patients After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With High-Dose Cyclophosphamide.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) with high-dose cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has resulted in a low incidence of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), graft failure, and non-relapse mortality. However, post-transplantation relapse remains a common cause of treatment failure in high-risk patients. Unraveling the mechanisms of relapse is therefore crucial for designing effective relapse treatment strategies. One of these mechanisms is the loss of the mismatched HLA on the recipient's leukemic cells. To study the incidence and clinical relevance of this phenomenon, we analyzed 181 patients treated with Haplo-HSCT with PTCy (2007-2019), of which 37 relapsed patients after transplantation. According to the kit employed for HLA-loss analysis, among 22 relapsed patients, we identified HLA loss at relapse in 6 of the 22 patients (27%) studied. Based on the results obtained, the genomic loss of HLA was more common in females than males (66 vs. 33%) and HLA-loss relapses occurred later than classical relapses (345 vs. 166 days). Moreover, the patients with HLA-loss had a greater presence of active disease at the time of transplantation and had undergone a larger number of treatment lines than the group with classical relapses (66 vs. 43% and 66 vs. 18%, respectively). Four of these relapses were studied retrospectively, while two were studied prospectively, the results of which could be considered for patient management. Additionally, two relapsed patients analyzed retrospectively had myeloid neoplasms. One patient had not undergone any treatment, and three had undergone donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) and chemotherapy. All presented severe GVHD and disease progression. In contrast, the two patients studied prospectively had a lymphoid neoplasm and were not treated with DLIs. One of them was treated with chemotherapy but died from disease progression, and the other patient underwent a second Haplo-HSCT from a different donor and is still alive. We can conclude that the detection of HLA-loss at the onset of relapse after Haplo-HSCT with PTCy could help in clinical practice to select appropriate rescue treatment, thereby avoiding the use of DLIs or a second transplantation from the same donor.