Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment improve pediatric headache-related disability?

PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for improving disability in children with chronic headache using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model as a conceptual framework for disability assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children with chronic headache (n = 50; ages 10-19 years; 62% female) attended an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment program 8 h/day, 5 times/week for 2-7 weeks. Disability measures were administered at admission, discharge, and 6-8 week follow-up. Disability outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Friedman's analyses of variance were used to compare scores across two and three longitudinal time points, respectively. RESULTS: After rehabilitation, disability reduced on the Headache Impact Test-6 from severe impact at admission to some impact at follow-up (p < 0.001). Median time on the modified Bruce protocol increased from 13.1 min (interquartile range = 12.6-14.1) to 14.4 min (interquartile range = 12.9-16.3), p < 0.001, with gains maintained at follow-up. Improvements in pain and disability were associated with improvements in school participation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study support the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for improving disability in children with chronic headache.Implication for rehabilitationIntensive interdisciplinary pain treatment is effective for improving pain and disability in children with chronic headaches.Application of the ICF model to disability assessment suggests that children with chronic headaches may experience significant disability, even when standardized assessments of physical capacity are normal.The modified Bruce protocol, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computerized Adaptive Tests, and Headache Impact Test-6 appear particularly valuable in understanding the nature of disability in children with chronic headaches.

Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes From an Interdisciplinary Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Program for Children With Chronic Migraine and Headache.

BACKGROUND: Many children suffering from chronic headache and migraine present with comorbid functional disability, including physical, social, emotional, and academic activities. For children severely impaired by headache, intensive interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation treatment (IIPT) can improve functioning. However, there are limited data evaluating children's response to rehabilitation across several time points. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the trajectory of recovery for children undergoing IIPT for chronic headache, as well as to examine the proposed assumption that physical and psychosocial functioning improves prior to a reported reduction in pain. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes in a clinical database of 135 children admitted to an IIPT program between the years 2008 and 2014 was analyzed. Available data across 5 separate time points (up to 1-year post-discharge) were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five children of mean age 15.2 (SD = 2.2) and 74% female provided data for review. Linear mixed model demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pain-specific measures of functioning, including daily functioning (change estimate = -14.53) emotional functioning (change estimate = -14.63), family functioning (change estimate = -5.78), and school absences (change estimate = -11.47) over a 12-month period (all P's ≤ .01). A more general measure of quality of life improved during the program, based upon child (change estimate = +10.07) and parent report (change estimate = +15.31); although these gains did not continue to improve post-discharge. As expected, although children did not report a reduction in pain during rehabilitation (change estimate = +0.07), they did report a significant drop in perceived pain in the 12 months following discharge from the program (change estimate = -2.12, P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with chronic headache and migraine who are severely functionally impaired demonstrated linear improvement in pain-specific patient-reported outcomes over time; however, there remains a need for improved methodology in analyzing response to IIPT programs.

Living with chronic headache: a qualitative study exploring goal management in chronic headache.

OBJECTIVES: Effective goal management may potentially prevent or reduce disability in chronic pain. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the nature of goal management in the context of chronic headache (CH). METHODS: Interviews with 20 patients were conducted, coded, and analyzed using a combined data-driven and theory-driven approach. The dual process model (DPM) was used as a theoretical framework for this study. RESULTS: Participants used a combination of strategies to regain and maintain a balance between personal goals and resources available for goal pursuit. Furthermore, their retrospective reports indicated a development in strategy use of time. Three goal management phases were identified: (1) a "persistence phase," characterized by the use of "resource-depleting" assimilative strategies to remain engaged in goals, (2) a "reorientation phase" in accommodative strategies were used to regain balance, and (3) a "balancing phase" in which a combination of "resource-depleting" and "resource-replenishing" assimilative strategies was used to maintain balance. CONCLUSIONS: Goal management is a dynamic process that may contribute to the development of, and recovery from, headache-related disability. Rehabilitation services offered to individuals with CH should target this process to promote optimal functioning. Implications for Rehabilitation Individuals with chronic headache use assimilative and accommodative goal management strategies to be able to pursue personal goals despite the limitations of chronic headache. Before accommodating goals to the limitations of chronic headache, many patients go through a phase of persistence, characterized by the use of resource-depleting assimilative strategies. A reorientation phase, characterized by accommodation of goals to the limitations of chronic headache, allows patients to adopt a more balanced way of pursuing personal goals.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Outpatient Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation of Chronic Headache Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an intensive outpatient program designed to improve functioning and reduce psychological impairment in chronic headache patients. BACKGROUND: Chronic headaches, occurring 15 or more days per month, for three or more months, may arise from multiple International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnoses: Chronic Migraine, Chronic Tension Type Headache, New Daily Persistent Headache, Chronic Post Traumatic Headaches, and Medication Overuse Headache. Several interdisciplinary programs that treat patients with chronic headaches have reported decreases in headache frequency. This study sought to evaluate the effect of a 3 week interdisciplinary treatment program for patients with chronic headache disorders on headache severity, functional status, and psychological impairment. METHODS: Subjects were 379 patients admitted to an outpatient chronic headache treatment program. Assessments of headache severity, psychological status, and functional impairment were completed by 371 (97.8%) of these at the time of admission. At discharge, 340 subjects (89.7%) provided assessment data, and 152 (40.1%) provided data at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Subjects' mean ratings on a 0-10 scale for their headache pain in the prior week declined, and these improvements were maintained at follow-up. (Estimated marginal means on a 0-10 scale for Average pain: admission 6.1, discharge 3.5, follow-up 3.3; for Least pain: admission 3.2; discharge 1.5; follow-up 1.3; for Worst pain: admission 8.2; discharge 6.4; follow-up 5.7), and similar results were found for current pain (admission 4.7; discharge 2.8; follow-up 2.4): Measures of functional impairment also improved following treatment, and these gains were maintained at 12 month follow up (Estimated marginal mean Headache Impact Test-6 score: admission 66.1, discharge 55.4, follow-up 51.9; Estimated marginal mean Pain Disability Index score: admission 36.2, discharge 14.1, follow-up 11.6). As measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, anxiety and reactivity to stress decreased following treatment, and remained improved at follow-up (Estimated marginal mean score for Anxiety: admission 8.7, discharge 5.2, follow-up 4.4; Estimated marginal mean score for stress: admission 14.9, discharge 7.2, follow-up 7.6). Depression decreased with treatment, but while 1-year follow-up depression scores remained significantly lower than at admission, they were also significantly higher than at discharge (Estimated marginal means: admission 13.3, discharge 4.1, follow-up 6.6). CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the efficacy of the treatment model. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are also discussed.

[Multimodal pain therapy]. / Multimodale Schmerztherapie.

Chronic pain has both high prevalence and a significant economic impact in Germany. The most common chronic pain types are low back pain and headache. On the one hand, the management of chronic pain patients is incomplete, yet it is often overtreated in orthopaedic surgical settings with interventional procedures. The reason for this is the structure of outpatient management and the way it is paid for in Germany. Pain management of patients with private insurance cover is no better because of "doctor shopping". Medical guidelines could be of some help in improving the situation, but they are widely unknown, and have still to demonstrate whether they have any impact on GP treatment pathways. The "gold standard" multimodal pain therapy shows significant improvement in many studies compared to monomodal therapy regimes and interventional regimes, but is too rarely recommended by the patients' physicians, whether GPs or specialists. Because of the huge number of institutions nowadays that, for the sake of form, offer such multimodal therapies, these need to be differentiated in terms of their structural and process quality. A first step is the "k edoq" project. It is essential to improve knowledge of the principles of modern pain management. This includes better networking and communication between doctors, physiotherapists and psychologists, and at the grassroots level, providing the public with more detailed and better information.

Retrospective outcome analyses for headaches in a pain rehabilitation interdisciplinary program.

BACKGROUND: Incapacitating chronic migraine and other severe headaches can have significant impact on peoples' lives, including family and occupational functioning. Although a number of reports have investigated the prevalence and medical treatment of chronic headache, few have reported on the efficacy of treating these disorders within a comprehensive, intensive chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP), instead of a headache-specific program. CPRPs provide treatment of headache by focusing not only on physical pain, but also its association with impaired mood and function. METHODS: We examined the efficacy of CPRP in patients with chronic headache via a retrospective analysis of 123 patients (76.4% female), ages 21 to 85, who completed the CPRP at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2007 and December 2011, and were diagnosed using International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition and International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition revision, with migraine or headache as a major complaint. Outcome measures included: pain intensity scores present at the moment of questioning where 10 is the maximal (0-10/10), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) scores, (measuring mood), and Pain Disability Index scores (measuring function). Repeated measures t-tests were used. RESULTS: Average pain score on admission was 6.4, and 3.4 upon discharge. Average function on admission was moderately impaired, and normalized on discharge. The average depression score was in the moderate range, and had normalized on discharge. The average anxiety score on admission was in the severe range and was in the mild range on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that individuals had statistically and clinically meaningful improvement in pain, mood, and function. Data suggest that an interdisciplinary CPRP approach for patients diagnosed with headache can be effective in helping to decrease pain, as well as normalize mood and function. Thus, CPRPs serve as an alternative treatment to multidisciplinary headache programs, interventional pain techniques, and primary care standard headache care.

The role of selected variables in the diagnosis of cervical derangement syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The study analyzed correlations between selected variables in cervical derangement syndromes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 63 patients regarding pain (VAS, McGill Pain Questionnaire), mobility (CROM goniometer), dizziness, nausea, the duration of the current episode, and the number of previous episodes (history). Student's t and chi(2) tests and Pearson's r correlation were used. RESULTS: Overall pain intensity correlated positively with the indexes of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the duration of the current episode, intensity of the proximal and distal symptoms and negatively with protraction or extension. Headache correlated positively with neck pain and negatively with retraction. Neck pain cor-related negatively with multiple cervical movements and positively with intensity of the distal symptoms. A positive relationship between shoulder and upper limb pain was observed. Patients with higher overall pain intensity or lower shoulder pain intensity experienced dizziness more often. The duration of the current episode correlated positively with the number of previous episodes, the frequency of nausea, limited extension and limited protraction. Nausea coexisted with dizziness and reduced protraction. The degree of flexion restriction correlated positively with the number of previous episodes. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Overall and proximal pain intensity, mobility of the cervical spine, the duration of the current episode and dizziness are useful in diagnosis of cervical derangement syndromes. 2. Intensity of the distal symptoms, the number of previous episodes and nausea should be particularly monitored.

Attachment style is associated with perceived spouse responses and pain-related outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Attachment theory can provide a heuristic model for examining factors that may influence the relationship of social context to adjustment in chronic pain. This study examined the associations of attachment style with self-reported pain behavior, pain intensity, disability, depression, and perceived spouse responses to pain behavior. We also examined whether attachment style moderates associations between perceived spouse responses and self-reported pain behavior and depressive symptoms, as well as perceived spouse responses as a mediator of these associations. METHOD: Individuals with chronic pain (N = 182) completed measures of self-reported attachment style, perceived spouse responses, and pain-related criterion variables. RESULTS: Secure attachment was inversely associated with self-reported pain behaviors, pain intensity, disability, depressive symptoms, and perceived negative spouse responses; preoccupied and fearful attachment scores were positively associated with these variables. In multivariable regression models, both attachment style and perceived spouse responses were uniquely associated with self-reported pain behavior and depressive symptoms. Attachment style did not moderate associations between perceived spouse responses to self-reported pain behavior and pain criterion variables, but negative spouse responses partially mediated some relationships between attachment styles and pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that attachment style is associated with pain-related outcomes and perceptions of spouse responses. The hypothesized moderation effects for attachment were not found; however, mediation analyses showed that perceived spouse responses may partially explain associations between attachment and adjustment to pain. Future research is needed to clarify how attachment style and the social environment affect the pain experience.

In-patient versus out-patient withdrawal programmes for medication overuse headache: a 2-year randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) management usually includes a medication withdrawal. The choice of withdrawal modalities remains a matter of debate. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of in-patient versus out-patient withdrawal programmes in 82 consecutive patients with MOH in an open-label prospective randomized trial. The main outcome measure was the reduction in number of headache days after 2 months and after 2 years. The responders were defined as patients who had reverted to episodic headaches and to an intake of acute treatments for headache less than 10 days per month. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients had a complete drug withdrawal (n = 36 in the out-patient group; n = 35 in the in-patient group). The reduction of headache frequency and subjective improvement did not differ between groups. The long-term responder rate was similar in the out- and in- patient groups (44% and 44%; p = 0.810). The only predictive factor of a bad outcome 2 years after withdrawal was an initial consumption of more than 150 units of acute treatments for headache per month (OR = 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-9.3; p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Given that we did not observe any difference in efficacy between the in- and out-patient withdrawals, we would recommend out-patient withdrawal in the first instance for patients with uncomplicated MOH.

Chronic pain rehabilitation in chronic headache disorders.

This article reviews the treatment goals and efficacy of comprehensive pain rehabilitation programs for the treatment of chronic headache. Substantial data demonstrate improved outcomes from rehabilitative treatment for chronic noncancer pain. We present a discussion of the most relevant recent publications on pain rehabilitation in chronic headache disorders. This article describes pain rehabilitation, reviews outcome data for chronic pain patients treated in this setting, and describes the unique applicability of this treatment approach for patients with chronic headache. Particular attention is directed to the rationale for and the results of the withdrawal, in a pain rehabilitation setting, of opioids and simple analgesics, ergots, and triptans that contribute to medication overuse headaches. Additionally, a case example is reviewed that illustrates the structure and function of a pain rehabilitation program in the treatment of a patient with intractable headache.

Chronic pain rehabilitation in chronic headache disorders.

This article reviews the treatment goals and efficacy of comprehensive pain rehabilitation programs for the treatment of chronic headache. Substantial data demonstrate improved outcomes from rehabilitative treatment for chronic noncancer pain. We present a discussion of the most relevant recent publications on pain rehabilitation in chronic headache disorders. This article describes pain rehabilitation, reviews outcome data for chronic pain patients treated in this setting, and describes the unique applicability of this treatment approach for patients with chronic headache. Particular attention is directed to the rationale for and the results of the withdrawal, in a pain rehabilitation setting, of opioids and simple analgesics, ergots, and triptans that contribute to medication overuse headaches. Additionally, a case example is reviewed that illustrates the structure and function of a pain rehabilitation program in the treatment of a patient with intractable headache.

[Chronic daily headache: management and rehabilitation]. / Cefalea cronica quotidiana: gestione e riabilitazione.

In 2001, WHO evidenced headache among the first twenty disability agents in the world. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, II version (ICHD-II) recognises 24 types of chronic headache and states primary headaches as chronic when attacks appear for more than 15 days per month, for at least three months. Migraine given by drugs overuse, defined by ICDH-II in 2004 (and revised in 2005) as MOH, represents a common and debilitating disorder, which can be defined as generation, perpetuation and persistence of intense chronic migraine caused by the frequent and excessive use of (symptomatic) drugs, giving an immediate relief. MOH is associated with overuse of a combination of analgesics, barbiturates, opiods, Ergot alkaloids, aspirin, FANS, caffeine and triptans. Furthermore, some psychological and behavioural states seem particularly important in promoting and sustaining drugs abuse. The management and rehabilitation of patients affected by CDH, over-using symptomatic drugs, consists in the suspension and gradual reduction of their assumption, because of tolerance and addiction possibilities. Therapeutic success, defined as total absence of headache or frequency reduction over 50% in a period of time from 1 to 6 months, stands around 72-74%.

A specific exercise program and modification of postural alignment for treatment of cervicogenic headache: a case report.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVE: To describe an intervention approach consisting of a specific active-exercise program and modification of postural alignment for an individual with cervicogenic headache. BACKGROUND: The patient was a 46-year-old male with a 7-year history of cervicogenic headache. He reported constant symptoms with an average intensity of 5/10 on a visual analogue scale where 0 indicated no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. Average pain intensity in the week prior to the initial evaluation was 3/10 secondary to trigger point injections. The patient's headache symptoms worsened with activities that involved use of his arms and prolonged sitting. METHODS AND MEASURES: The patient was treated 7 times over a 3-month period. Impairments of alignment, muscle function, and movement of the cervical, scapulothoracic, and lumbar regions were identified. Outcome measurements included headache frequency, intensity, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire. Intervention included modification of alignment and movement during active cervical and upper extremity movements. The patient also received functional instructions focused on diminishing the effect of the weight of the upper extremities on the cervical spine. RESULTS: The patient reported a decrease in headache frequency and intensity (1 headache in 3 weeks, intensity 1/10) and a decrease in his NDI score from 31 (severe disability) to 11 (mild disability). The patient also demonstrated improvement in upper cervical joint mobility, cervical range of motion, scapular alignment, and scapulothoracic muscle strength. CONCLUSION: Interventions that included modification of alignment in the cervical, scapulothoracic, and lumbar region, along with instruction in a specific active-exercise program to address movement impairments in these 3 regions, appeared to have been successful in relieving headaches and improving function in this patient.

Successful withdrawal from analgesic abuse in a group of youngsters with chronic daily headache.

Abuse of ergotamine and analgesics is common in adults. It coexists with headache and can also induce headaches. Ten to 15% of patients attending headache clinics and 1% of the general population suffer from chronic daily headache due to medication misuse. Indeed, this phenomenon was recently regarded as an epidemic. Nonetheless, analgesic-induced headache in children and adolescents was first reported in 1998. We report on our experience with children and adolescents with daily or almost-daily headache concomitant with daily or almost-daily analgesic intake. Over a period of 3 years, we evaluated 26 children (19 girls and 7 boys) with chronic daily or near-daily headache related to daily analgesic intake. The mean age of the group was 14.2 years (range, 12-18), and the mean headache history duration was 1.6 years (range, 3 months to 4 1/2 years). The mean number of headache days per month was 28.1 (range, 19-31). All patients had no history of migraine prior to the chronic headache phase according to the International Headache Society criteria. They were using at least one dose of analgesic drug for each headache, whereas 16 were using analgesic drugs daily. The weekly analgesic intake averaged 28.1 tablets (range, 19-41). The majority abused simple analgesics. Twenty-one took acetaminophen alone. Five took a combination; four took a compound containing acetaminophen, caffeine, and codeine; and the fifth patient took a compound containing aspirin, caffeine, and codeine. All patients were informed about the phenomenon of medication-induced headache and were encouraged to achieve drug withdrawal. Withdrawal led to complete cessation of all headaches in 20 patients. In 5 patients, the daily headache resolved; however, they suffered from intermittent episodic migraine attacks, which were frequent enough in 3 to initiate prophylactic medication. One adolescent continued to have daily headache. Analgesic-induced headache does occur in adolescents. Successful withdrawal from the offending analgesics was achieved without hospitalization or significant interference with daily life and with complete disappearance of the induced chronic daily headache in 25 of 26 patients.