Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities.

PURPOSE: Infertility is estimated to affect 15% of couples, having chromosome abnormalities an important role in its etiology. The main objective of this work was to access the reproductive success of ART in infertile couples with chromosomal abnormalities comparing to a control group with normal karyotype. METHODS: A 7-year retrospective karyotype analysis of infertile couples was done. Data regarding type of infertility, couples' ages, ART performed, and their reproductive success were obtained. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) were used to estimate magnitude of association between the reproductive success and the different groups. RESULTS: We found a prevalence of 7.83% of chromosome abnormalities in our population (233 couples out of 2989). Chromosomal anomalies were found in 82 men (34.75%) and 154 women (65.25%), with low-grade mosaicism being the most prevalent (50.85%), followed by autosomal translocations (17.37%) and sex chromosomes abnormalities (13.56%). Only 2359 couples were treated with ART. There was a non-significant lower reproductive success rate in the cases (OR = 0.899, p = 0.530) with IVF providing the higher success rate. In general, female carriers of chromosome anomalies had a higher success rate, although not significant. CONCLUSION: Although the differences regarding success rate between groups were not found statistically significant, we still advocate that cytogenetic analysis should be performed routinely in all infertile couples namely before ART. This might help deciding the best treatment options including Preimplantation Genetic Testing for aneuploidies or structural rearrangements and minimize the risk of transmission of anomalies to the offspring.

Is there an effect of intranasal insulin on development and behaviour in Phelan-McDermid syndrome? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) or 22q13.3 deletion syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder with at least 60 children and 35 adults diagnosed in the Netherlands. Clinical features are moderate to severe intellectual disability and behavioural problems in the autism spectrum. Other researchers had observed a beneficial effect of intranasal insulin on development and behaviour in a pilot study in six children with PMS. To validate this effect, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a stepped-wedge design. From March 2013 to June 2015, 25 children aged 1-16 years with a molecularly confirmed 22q13.3 deletion including the SHANK3 gene participated in the clinical trial for a period of 18 months. Starting 6 months before the trial, children were systematically assessed for cognitive, language and motor development and for adaptive, social and emotional behaviour every 6 months. The second, third and fourth assessments were followed by daily nose sprays containing either intranasal insulin or intranasal placebo for a 6-month period. A fifth assessment was done directly after the end of the trial. Intranasal insulin did not cause serious adverse events. It increased the level of developmental functioning by 0.4-1.4 months per 6-month period, but the effect was not statistically significant in this small group. We found a stronger effect of intranasal insulin, being significant for cognition and social skills, for children older than 3 years, who usually show a decrease of developmental growth. However, clinical trials in larger study populations are required to prove the therapeutic effect of intranasal insulin in PMS.

Developmental presentation, medical complexities, and service delivery for a child with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome.

PURPOSE: To discuss the developmental presentation, complicating factors, and delivery of physical therapy services through the Birth to Three System, for 1 child with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. KEY POINTS: History, presenting problems, medical complexities, developmental and behavioral characteristics, interventions, and implications for service delivery are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: The child experienced many difficulties reported in the literature related to the wide phenotype of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Focus on caregiver instruction and education to accomplish family-driven, functional outcomes increased carryover and allowed the greatest potential for success. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Genetic disorders such as 16p11.2 deletion syndrome are increasingly being recognized as etiologic factors in neurodevelopmental conditions. It is critical for physical therapists to be aware of the varied manifestations and effects of this genetic disorder. Advanced problem solving and decision-making, ongoing assessment, and collaboration are required to comprehensively support the family in meeting the child's medical, behavioral, and developmental needs.