Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cytotherapy ; 26(8): 939-947, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AIMS: The marketing authorization of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) in Brazil is recent. The features of these therapies impose specialized regulatory action and are consequently challenging for developers. The goal of this study was to identify the industry's experience in clinical development, marketing authorization and access to ATMPs through the Unified Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese), from a regulatory perspective. METHODS: A survey containing structured questions was conducted among research participants who work at companies that commercialize ATMPs. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: We invited 15 foreign pharmaceutical companies, of which 10 agreed to participate. Overall, participants assessed that Brazil has a well-established regulatory system, especially the sanitary registration by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), which ensures the quality, safety, and efficacy of the products. The Agency's good interaction with the regulated sector, the harmonization of sanitary and ethical assessment systems with other countries, and the analysis time in the biosafety assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) stand out as positive in industry's evaluation. On the other hand, it is important to advance the pricing regulation for these products since Brazilian regulations do not establish specific criteria for ATMP. One of the biggest challenges is the difficulty for the SUS in reimbursing these very high-cost therapies, especially using current Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methods. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the increasing number of approvals of cell and gene therapies in Brazil in the coming years, a close dialogue between the industry and the public sector is recommended to advance regulatory improvements (pricing and HTA). Additionally, the construction of policies to promote the national Health Economic-Industrial Complex, based on a mission-oriented vision that encourages innovative models of financing, especially those that consider risk-sharing and co-financing technologies, will help provide the population with universal, equitable and sustainable access to ATMP in the SUS.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Brasil , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/economía , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/métodos , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Terapia Genética/economía
2.
In. Consolim-Colombo, Fernanda M; Saraiva, José Francisco Kerr; Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira. Tratado de Cardiologia: SOCESP / Cardiology Treaty: SOCESP. São Paulo, Manole, 4ª; 2019. p.70-76.
Monografía en Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1008908
3.
Stem Cells Dev ; 22 Suppl 1: 40-3, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24304074

RESUMEN

Argentina has a significant number of researchers in public and private institutions conducting research in regenerative medicine and stem cells. There is not specific legislation in this area; however, the National Ministry of Health has issued regulations under the scope of the Transplant Act and the Medicines Act. Alongside the groups doing research, it is possible to find professionals offering experimental stem cell therapies to patients. These professionals take refuge in the term "medical practice" and sell experimental treatment to patients with no guarantee of safety and security given that they were not tested in clinical research. These practices offered to patients in a scheme, apparently legal, are generating an important number of judicial actions requesting the payment of said treatments. The decisions of the courts ordering payment in most cases are generating a transfer of funds from patients, social welfare systems, and the state to medical centers offering stem cell experimental therapies. This article describes the current regulations as well as the course of action to solve the emerging problems of these new technologies at legislative level.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/economía , Medicina Regenerativa/economía , Investigación con Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Argentina , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/ética , Humanos , Medicina Regenerativa/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicina Regenerativa/tendencias , Investigación con Células Madre/economía , Investigación con Células Madre/ética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA