Goal-directed therapy guided by the FloTrac sensor in major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide insights into the potential benefits of goal-directed therapy guided by FloTrac in reducing postoperative complications and improving outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate goal-directed therapy guided by FloTrac in major surgery, comparing goal-directed therapy with usual care or invasive monitoring in cardiac and noncardiac surgery subgroups. The quality of the articles and evidence were evaluated with a risk of bias tool and GRADE. RESULTS: We included 29 randomized controlled trials with 3,468 patients. Goal-directed therapy significantly reduced the duration of hospital stay (mean difference -1.43 days; 95%CI 2.07 to -0.79; I2 81%), intensive care unit stay (mean difference -0.77 days; 95%CI -1.18 to -0.36; I2 93%), and mechanical ventilation (mean difference -2.48 hours, 95%CI -4.10 to -0.86, I2 63%). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury or hypotension, but goal-directed therapy significantly reduced the risk of heart failure or pulmonary edema (RR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23 - 0.92; I2 0%). CONCLUSION: Goal-directed therapy guided by the FloTrac sensor improved clinical outcomes and shortened the length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit in patients undergoing major surgery. Further research can validate these results using specific protocols and better understand the potential benefits of FloTrac beyond these outcomes.

Estado actual y retos futuros en el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas / Current status and future challenges in the treatment of rheumatic diseases

Las nuevas estrategias, que incluyen el diagnóstico y el tratamiento tempranos, el enfoque de tratamiento dirigido a un objetivo, la remisión como ese objetivo principal del tratamiento, la participación de los pacientes en las decisiones terapéuticas, junto con el desarrollo de nuevos tratamientos efectivos, han cambiado las expectativas de los reumatólogos y de los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas. Todavía existen, sin embargo, importantes desafíos tales como la seguridad a largo plazo de los tratamientos actuales y poder escoger tratamientos más individualizados y eficaces, de forma tal de elegir el mejor tratamiento para cada paciente. El futuro, como en el resto de la medicina, probablemente sea la prevención del desarrollo de enfermedades reumáticas. Discutiremos estos temas en esta revisión. (AU)

New strategies, including early diagnosis and treatment, targeted therapy, remission as the main objective of treatment, patient involvement in therapeutic decision-making, and the development of new effective therapies, have changed the expectations of rheumatologists and patients with rheumatic diseases.There are still serious challenges, such as the long-term safety of current treatments and the ability to make more individualized and effective treatments to choose the best treatment for each patient. The future, as that of the whole of medical science, will probably lie in preventing the development of rheumatic diseases. We will discuss these issues in this review. (AU)

Feasibility and beneficial effects of an early goal directed therapy after cardiac arrest: evaluation by conductance method.

Although beneficial effects of an early goal directed therapy (EGDT) after cardiac arrest and successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been described, clinical implementation in this period seems rather difficult. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and the impact of EGDT on myocardial damage and function after cardiac resuscitation. A translational pig model which has been carefully adapted to the clinical setting was employed. After 8 min of cardiac arrest and successful ROSC, pigs were randomized to receive either EGDT (EGDT group) or therapy by random computer-controlled hemodynamic thresholds (noEGDT group). Therapeutic algorithms included blood gas analysis, conductance catheter method, thermodilution cardiac output and transesophageal echocardiography. Twenty-one animals achieved successful ROSC of which 13 pigs survived the whole experimental period and could be included into final analysis. cTnT and LDH concentrations were lower in the EGDT group without reaching statistical significance. Comparison of lactate concentrations between 1 and 8 h after ROSC exhibited a decrease to nearly baseline levels within the EGDT group (1 h vs 8 h: 7.9 vs. 1.7 mmol/l, P < 0.01), while in the noEGDT group lactate concentrations did not significantly decrease. The EGDT group revealed a higher initial need for fluids (P < 0.05) and less epinephrine administration (P < 0.05) post ROSC. Conductance method determined significant higher values for preload recruitable stroke work, ejection fraction and maximum rate of pressure change in the ventricle for the EGDT group. EGDT after cardiac arrest is associated with a significant decrease of lactate levels to nearly baseline and is able to improve systolic myocardial function. Although the results of our study suggest that implementation of an EGDT algorithm for post cardiac arrest care seems feasible, the impact and implementation of EGDT algorithms after cardiac arrest need to be further investigated.

Lactate: Where Are We Now?

There is a tight relationship between lactate levels (and its changes over time) with morbidity and mortality and the presence of tissue hypoxia/hypoperfusion in both models of shock and clinical studies. These findings have placed lactate in the center of guiding resuscitation in patients with increased lactate levels. However, given the complex metabolism and clearance of lactate, especially in sepsis, the actual use of lactate is more complex than suggested by some guidelines. By using other markers of tissue hypoperfusion together with lactate levels provides a more solid framework to guide the initial hours of resuscitation.

Treatment of Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Current Evidence-Based Practices.

Sepsis remains a field of active research with many unknown and unanswered questions. Over the past few decades, advancements in sepsis management have led to improved mortality and morbidity. This article will review the current evidence-based practices of the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. It will also critically appraise some of the current controversies in sepsis management, such as fluids, steroids, early vasopressors, early goal-directed therapy and immunotherapy.

The role of goal-directed therapy in the prevention of acute kidney injury after major gastrointestinal surgery: Substudy of the OPTIMISE trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important adverse outcome after major surgery. Peri-operative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDT) may improve outcomes by reducing complications such as AKI. OBJECTIVE: To determine if GDT was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative AKI according to specific renal biomarkers. DESIGN: Prospective substudy of the OPTIMISE trial, a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing peri-operative GDT to usual patient care. SETTING: Four UK National Health Service hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 287 high-risk patients aged at least 50 years undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was AKI defined as urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipase (NGAL) at least 150 ng ml 24 and 72 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were between-group differences in NGAL measurements and NGAL : creatinine ratios 24 and 72 h after surgery and AKI stage 2 or greater according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: In total, 20 of 287 patients (7%) experienced postoperative AKI of KDIGO grade 2 or 3 within 30 days. The proportion of patients with urinary NGAL at least 150 ng ml 24 or 72 h after surgery was similar in the two groups [GDT 31/144 (21.5%) patients vs. usual patient care 28/143 (19.6%) patients; P = 0.88]. Absolute values of urinary NGAL were also similar at 24 h (GDT 53.5 vs. usual patient care 44.1 ng ml; P = 0.38) and 72 h (GDT 45.1 vs. usual patient care 41.1 ng ml; P = 0.50) as were urinary NGAL : creatinine ratios at 24 h (GDT 45 vs. usual patient care 43 ng mg; P = 0.63) and 72 h (GDT 66 vs. usual patient care 63 ng mg; P = 0.62). The incidence of KDIGO-defined AKI was also similar between the groups [GDT 9/144 (6%) patients vs. usual patient care 11/143 (8%) patients; P = 0.80]. CONCLUSION: In this trial, GDT did not reduce the incidence of AKI amongst high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. This may reflect improving standards in usual patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: OPTIMISE Trial Registration ISRCTN04386758.

Multimodalidad y fusión de imágenes en el tratamiento percutáneo de la insuficiencia tricuspídea / Multimodality and fusion imaging in percutaneous therapy of tricuspid regurgitation

No disponible

Assessment of early goal-directed therapy guideline adherence: Balancing clinical importance and feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Assessing adherence to Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is challenging and might account for the negative findings and generalisability of the major trials to a real-life setting. This study was aimed (1) to extract key components of pediatric EGDT guidelines potentially becoming adherence criteria; (2) to classify adherence criteria into complete, clinically important, and feasible; and (3) to compare percent adherence to selected guidelines using the three approaches. METHODS: This study started with review of existing evidence to extract key components of pediatric EGDT guidelines. Modified Delphi method was then conducted in two rounds among national experts to identify feasible and/or clinically important criteria. Data from the national prospective multicenter study "Clinical Effectiveness of the Utilization of Bundled Care for Severe Sepsis and Septicemia Children" at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) during 1 June 2012 and 28 February 2014 was used to compare percentage of adherence across the three approaches. RESULTS: Of 28 components extracted from the review, 10 were identified by the national experts through the Modified Delphi as feasible whereas 8 were identified as clinically important. Thirty-one severe sepsis patients (48.39% male, median age 3.4 years) were reviewed. Sepsis mortality was 9.7%, a significant reduction from 19% and 42% in 2010 and 2007, respectively. Based on the complete adherence criteria, the percent adherence varied from 60.71% to 89.29% (overall mean 76.84%), with lower adherence in the dead than the survived cases (73.81% vs 77.17%; p = 0.55). The percent adherence varied by criteria used: 69.35%, 76.84%, and 84.52% for clinical importance, complete, and feasibility criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adherence determination based on selected clinical importance alone might result in an incorrectly estimated clinical benefit of EGDT guidelines, especially in a resource-limited setting. Both clinical importance and feasibility should be integrated into the development of adherence assessment criteria.

Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study.

BACKGROUND: Usefulness of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management (GDHM) for patients without comorbidities is debated. After clinical implementation of a pulse contour analysis-guided GDHM protocol, which foresees early vasopressor use for recruiting unstressed volume, we conducted a matched-controlled analysis to explore its impact on the amount of fluids intraoperatively administered to patients without comorbidities who underwent extended abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer. METHODS: After 1:1 matching accounting for body mass index, oncologic disease severity and intraoperative blood losses, 22 patients treated according to this GDHM protocol were compared to a control group of 22 patients who had been managed according to the clinical decision of attending physicians, taken without advanced monitoring. Results are displayed as median[interquartile range]. RESULTS: All analyzed patients underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, bowel resection, peritonectomy and extended pelvic/periaortic lymphadenectomy; median length of surgery was 517[480-605] min in patients receiving GDHM and 507[480-600] min in control group. Intraoperatively, patients undergoing GDHM received less fluids (crystalloids 2950[2700-3300] vs. 5150[4700-6000] mL, p < 0.001; colloids 100[50-200] vs. 750[500-1000] mL, p < 0.001) and showed a trend to more frequent vasopressor administration (32 vs 9%, p = 0.13). Greater intraoperative diuresis (540[480-620] mL vs. 450[400-500] mL, p = 0.007), lower blood lactates at surgery end (1.5[1.1-2] vs. 4.1[3.3-5] mmol/L, p < 0.001), shorter time to bowel function recovery (1 [1, 2] vs. 4 [3-5] days, p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (7 [6-8] vs 12 [9-16] days, p < 0.0001) were detected in patients receiving GDHM. CONCLUSIONS: In high-tumor load gynaecological patients without comorbidities who receive radical and prolonged surgery, intraoperative use of this novel GDHM protocol helped limit fluids administration with safety.

Plano de análise estatística para o estudo do tratamento precoce baseado em metas com utilização de uma visão fisiológica holística - estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK: um estudo randomizado e controlado / Statistical analysis plan for early goal-directed therapy using a physiological holistic view - the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK: a randomized controlled trial

RESUMO Fundamentação: O estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK é um estudo internacional, multicêntrico, randomizado e controlado comparando ressuscitação guiada pela perfusão periférica com ressuscitação guiada pelo lactato em pacientes com choque séptico, com a finalidade de testar a hipótese de que a ressuscitação guiada pela perfusão periférica associa-se a menor morbidade e mortalidade. Objetivo: Relatar o plano de análise estatística para o estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK. Métodos: Descrevemos o delineamento do estudo, os objetivos primário e secundários, pacientes, métodos de randomização, intervenções, desfechos e tamanho da amostra. Descrevemos nossos planos de análise estatística para os desfechos primários, secundários e terciários. Também descrevemos as análises de subgrupos e sensibilidade. Finalmente, fornecemos detalhes para a apresentação dos resultados, inclusive modelos de tabelas para apresentar as características basais, a evolução das variáveis de hemodinâmica e perfusão, e os efeitos dos tratamentos nos desfechos. Conclusão: Segundo as melhores práticas de pesquisa, relatamos nosso plano de análise estatística e plano de gestão de dados antes do fechamento da base de dados e do início da análise dos dados. Nossa expectativa é que este procedimento previna a ocorrência de vieses na análise e incremente a utilidade dos resultados relatados.

ABSTRACT Background: ANDROMEDA-SHOCK is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation to lactate-targeted resuscitation in patients with septic shock in order to test the hypothesis that resuscitation targeting peripheral perfusion will be associated with lower morbidity and mortality. Objective: To report the statistical analysis plan for the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. Methods: We describe the trial design, primary and secondary objectives, patients, methods of randomization, interventions, outcomes, and sample size. We describe our planned statistical analysis for the primary, secondary and tertiary outcomes. We also describe the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Finally, we provide details for presenting our results, including mock tables showing baseline characteristics, the evolution of hemodynamic and perfusion variables, and the effects of treatments on outcomes. Conclusion: According to the best trial practice, we report our statistical analysis plan and data management plan prior to locking the database and initiating the analyses. We anticipate that this procedure will prevent analysis bias and enhance the utility of the reported results.

Statistical analysis plan for early goal-directed therapy using a physiological holistic view - the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK: a randomized controlled trial. / Plano de análise estatística para o estudo do tratamento precoce baseado em metas com utilização de uma visão fisiológica holística - estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK: um estudo randomizado e controlado.

BACKGROUND: ANDROMEDA-SHOCK is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation to lactate-targeted resuscitation in patients with septic shock in order to test the hypothesis that resuscitation targeting peripheral perfusion will be associated with lower morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To report the statistical analysis plan for the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. METHODS: We describe the trial design, primary and secondary objectives, patients, methods of randomization, interventions, outcomes, and sample size. We describe our planned statistical analysis for the primary, secondary and tertiary outcomes. We also describe the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Finally, we provide details for presenting our results, including mock tables showing baseline characteristics, the evolution of hemodynamic and perfusion variables, and the effects of treatments on outcomes. CONCLUSION: According to the best trial practice, we report our statistical analysis plan and data management plan prior to locking the database and initiating the analyses. We anticipate that this procedure will prevent analysis bias and enhance the utility of the reported results.

FUNDAMENTAÇÃO: O estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK é um estudo internacional, multicêntrico, randomizado e controlado comparando ressuscitação guiada pela perfusão periférica com ressuscitação guiada pelo lactato em pacientes com choque séptico, com a finalidade de testar a hipótese de que a ressuscitação guiada pela perfusão periférica associa-se a menor morbidade e mortalidade. OBJETIVO: Relatar o plano de análise estatística para o estudo ANDROMEDA-SHOCK. MÉTODOS: Descrevemos o delineamento do estudo, os objetivos primário e secundários, pacientes, métodos de randomização, intervenções, desfechos e tamanho da amostra. Descrevemos nossos planos de análise estatística para os desfechos primários, secundários e terciários. Também descrevemos as análises de subgrupos e sensibilidade. Finalmente, fornecemos detalhes para a apresentação dos resultados, inclusive modelos de tabelas para apresentar as características basais, a evolução das variáveis de hemodinâmica e perfusão, e os efeitos dos tratamentos nos desfechos. CONCLUSÃO: Segundo as melhores práticas de pesquisa, relatamos nosso plano de análise estatística e plano de gestão de dados antes do fechamento da base de dados e do início da análise dos dados. Nossa expectativa é que este procedimento previna a ocorrência de vieses na análise e incremente a utilidade dos resultados relatados.

Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on early cognitive function in elderly patients with spinal stenosis: A Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE: To explore effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on early cognitive function in elderly patients with spinal stenosis. METHODS: 83 elderly patients with spinal stenosis were randomly classified into two groups: control group (n = 40) and GDFT group (n = 43). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, IL-6 and S100ß levels, hemodynamic parameters, cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), arterial lactic acid values, output of surgery, operation time and cases of hypotension, intraoperative complications within 7 days were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was about 21.67% in this study. The MoCA scores, inflammatory mediators, perfusion indexes (rSO2 and lactic acid)and intraoperative hemodynamics(HR, MAP, and CI)were not all the same at different time points (P < 0.05). The levels of inflammatory mediators (IL-6 and S100ß) in GDFT group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Total intake, amount of lactated Ringer's solution and cases of hypotension in GDFT group were significantly lower than control group (P < 0.05), but amount of voluven was higher than control group(P < 0.05). Compared with control group, the incidence of postoperative delirium, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension in GDFT group was lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: GDFT can maintain the stability of perioperative hemodynamics in the prone position of elderly patients with spinal stenosis, improve the balance between perfusion of tissue and organ and supply and demand of oxygen, reduce the inflammatory response, and reduce the incidence of early POCD in this type of surgery.

Early Goal-Directed Therapy: The History and Ongoing Impact on Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

The use of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock, a practice put forth by Dr. Rivers et al. in 2001, ushered in a new era of targeted sepsis therapy. After its publication, several further studies helped validate the protocolized approach to sepsis management, ultimately leading to its incorporation into the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Since that time, however, a trio of large multi-center randomized controlled trials have taken place to evaluate the efficacy of EGDT when compared with usual care and have demonstrated that strict adherence to the entirety of the original EGDT protocol is unnecessary for improved outcomes. Some recommendations, such as higher goal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and liberal crystalloid fluid resuscitation, are likely harmful. Despite controversy over a number of the recommendations, early identification of sepsis, source control, and prompt empiric antibiotic administration remain the mainstay of treatment for patients with sepsis and septic shock.