4-Aminopyridine treatment for nerve injury resulting from radical retro-pubic prostatectomy: a single-center double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men and leads to the second most common cause of cancer related mortality in men. Early detection of PCa allows for a potentially curative intervention. Most men will live over a decade from the time of their PCa diagnosis. Thus, treatments must balance curative interventions with their impact on quality of life. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one such potentially curative intervention but often leads to erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI). Approximately 90,000 RPs are performed each year in the USA. Post-operative ED and UI is thought to occur in part from traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) to the neurovascular bundles that surround the prostate. Thus, patients undergoing RP may be a population that would benefit from clinical studies that look at TPNI. METHODS: The study is a single-institution, double-blinded placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in which patients immediately post-RP receive either 4-aminopyrdine (4AP) or placebo in a 1:1 fashion. The primary outcome is evaluation of the efficacy of 4AP in accelerating the early return of baseline erectile and urinary function post-radical prostatectomy. DISCUSSION: This study is critical as it could reduce the morbidity associated with RP, a commonly performed operation, and identify a patient population that may greatly benefit into further TPNI research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03701581. Prospectively registered on October 10, 2018.

Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry.

AIMS: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. METHODS: This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023. RESULTS: Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice.

Incidence and clinical outcome of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury after periacetabular osteotomy.

Aims: Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury is a complication after periacetabular osteo-tomy (PAO) using an anterior approach, which might adversely affect the outcome. However, no prospective study has assessed the incidence and severity of this injury and its effect on the clinical outcomes over a period of time for longer than one year after PAO. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and severity of the symptoms of LFCN injury for ≥ three years after PAO and report its effect on clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 40 hips in 40 consecutive patients who underwent PAO between May 2016 and July 2018 were included in the study, as further follow-up of the same patients from a previous study. We prospectively evaluated the incidence, severity, and area of symptoms following LFCN injury. We also recorded the clinical scores at one year and ≥ three years postoperatively using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) scores. Results: A total of 20 patients (50%) had symptoms of a LFCN injury at one year after PAO. At ≥ three years postoperatively, the symptoms had completely resolved in seven of these patients and 13 (33%) had persistent symptoms. The severity and area of symptoms did not significantly differ between one and ≥ three years postoperatively. The JHEQ showed significant differences in the patient satisfaction and mental scores between those with and those without sypmtoms of LFCN injury at ≥ three years postoperatively, while there was no significant difference in the mean SF-36 scores. Conclusion: The incidence of LFCN injury after PAO using an anterior approach is high. The outcome of PAO, ≥ three years postoperatively, is poorer in patients with persistent symptoms from a perioperative LFCN injury, in that patient satisfaction and mental health scores are adversely affected.

Risk of suprascapular nerve injury in open Trillat procedure: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN. METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (ß angle). RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean ß angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the ß angle was measured at 12°. CONCLUSION: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.

[Functional Outcome of Peripheral Nerve Injury after Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: Comparison of Surgical and Conservative Treatment]. / Funktionelle Ergebnisse peripherer Nervenverletzungen nach kindlichen suprakondylären Humerusfrakturen: Vergleich operativer und konservativer Behandlung.

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children up to 10 years of age. The incidence of associated nerve injuries varies up to 15% depending on the data. Traumatic and iatrogenic lesions mainly affect the ulnar nerve. The regeneration of peripheral nerves is comparatively better in childhood. In the present study, the functional results after surgical and conservative treatment of nerve injuries in children after supracondylar fractures were compared and analyzed for influencing factors. In this retrospective comparative study, clinical data of pediatric nerve injuries following supracondylar humerus fractures treated over a period of 13 years (2008-2021) were analyzed. Children who were treated surgically (neurolysis, autologous reconstruction) due to insufficient clinical/neurophysiological improvement within 6 months after trauma or who were followed up conservatively in case of regression of symptoms within 6 months after trauma were included. All patients underwent multidisciplinary follow-up. 48 patients (26 female/22 male) with nerve injuries were included in this study. All patients had a history of surgical treatment with K- wire fixation due to severe dislocated fractures. The mean age was 7±2 years. The initial symptoms were severe motor deficits in all patients and sensory deficits in 87.5% (n=42). Isolated lesions of the ulnar nerve were most common (n=24, 50%). The nerve was neurolysed in 21 patients and additionally transferred to the volar side in 15. Nerve grafting was performed in 7 children and split repair in 2. Postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in motor function in all patients. Despite comparably severe motor deficits at initial presentation, further 20 children were treated conservatively due to the regression of neurological deficits. They showed comparably good functional results. No serious complications were recorded in either group. The average follow-up time was 377.25±524.87 days. The presented study shows excellent functional results after surgical treatment of pediatric nerve injuries without severe complications. Children with comparatively high-grade lesions at initial presentation have a good chance of complete spontaneous remission even without surgery. For this reason, the indication for surgery in children should be very carefully considered.

Sports-related peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb.

Peripheral nerve injuries in athletes affect the upper limb more commonly than the lower limb. Common mechanisms include compression, traction, laceration, and ischemia. Specific sports can have unique mechanisms of injury and are more likely to be associated with certain neuropathies. Familiarity with these sport-specific variables and recognition of the common presentations of upper limb neuropathic syndromes are important in assessing an athlete with a suspected peripheral nerve injury. Evaluation may require imaging modalities and/or electrodiagnostic testing to confirm a nerve injury. In some cases, diagnostic injections may be needed to differentiate neuropathic versus musculoskeletal etiology. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment/management and increases the likelihood of a safe return-to-sport and avoidance of long-term functional consequences. Most nerve injuries can be treated conservatively, however, severe or persistent cases may require surgical intervention. This monograph reviews key diagnostic, management, and preventative strategies for sports-related peripheral nerve injuries involving the upper limb.

Iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries: imaging features.

OBJECTIVE: Describe features of iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries on ultrasound and MRI, which occur when an instrument passes through the bone and injures the nerve after it penetrates the opposite cortex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a keyword search of the radiology database at a tertiary care orthopedic hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, those fulfilling the inclusion criteria of (1) instrumentation through the bone during surgery, (2) acute neuropathy immediately after surgery, (3) nerve injury confirmed on electrodiagnostics, and (4) imaging consistent with overshoot nerve injury were included. Imaging studies were retrospectively evaluated to determine primary and secondary signs of an overshoot nerve injury. RESULTS: Six patients (3 females, mean age 26.7 (range 10-49) years) had nerve injury fitting the mechanism of injury: 3 injuries to the radial nerve during fixation of distal humerus fractures, 1 tibial nerve and 1 superficial peroneal nerve injury during fixation of tibial fractures, and 1 posterior interosseous nerve injury during biceps tendon repair. Ultrasounds were performed in all while 4 also had MRI. Secondary signs included (1) cortical defect adjacent to injured nerve (n=2); (2) scar extending from bone to injured nerve (n=2); (3) screw tip pointing to injured nerve (n=1, 4) tract in bone on MRI from previous instrumentation pointing to injured nerve (n=2). CONCLUSION: In addition to primary signs such as laceration or neuroma, secondary signs of "overshoot" nerve injury include cortical defect, scar extending to nerve, screw tip pointing to nerve, and linear tract in the bone on MRI.

Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of sciatic nerve injury in acetabular fractures: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors of the sciatic nerve injury in patients with acetabulum fractures and assess its prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional review was conducted on 273 patients with acetabulum fractures who were treated between January 1st, 2017, and December 30th, 2019. The medical records and radiographs of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall nerve injury rate was 7.7% (21 of 273 cases), with 3.1% (8 of 273 cases) occurring because of the initial injury and 12.8% (13 of 101 cases) as post-operative complications. Among those with nerve injuries, 95.2% (20 of 21 cases) were males and the average age of the patients was 31.5 (SD 9.5) years. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collisions with 55.7% (152 of 273 cases), and the most common fracture pattern associated with nerve injury was posterior column and posterior wall fracture with 31.6% (6 of 21 cases). Hip dislocation was found in 16.5% (14 of 21 cases) of patients with nerve injury. The Kocher Langenbeck approach was the most common approach used for patients with post-operative nerve injury, and the prone position was significantly associated with sciatic nerve injury during the operation. Of all patients with nerve injury, 52% (11 of 21 cases) had fully recovered, 29% (6 of 21 cases) had partially recovered, and 19% (4 of 21 cases) had no improvement. The average follow-up was 15 months. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the incidence of sciatic nerve injuries in individuals with acetabulum fractures and highlights key risk factors, including hip dislocation, posterior column, and posterior wall fractures. It is noteworthy that the Kocher Langenbeck approach and the prone position may contribute to iatrogenic nerve injuries. Encouragingly, over half of the patients who suffered nerve injuries achieved full recovery, while nearly one-third experienced partial recovery. These findings underscore the vital significance of recognizing and addressing these risk factors in clinical practice.

Risk Factors for Peripheral Nerve Injury Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in 132,960 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a potentially devastating injury for patients. This study assessed the frequency of and risk factors for postoperative PNI following rTKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent rTKA from 2003 to 2015 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Demographics, medical histories, surgical details, and complications were compared between patients who sustained a PNI and those who did not to identify risk factors for the development of PNI after rTKA. RESULTS: Overall, 132,960 patients who underwent rTKA were identified, and 737 (0.56%) sustained a postoperative PNI. After adjusting for confounders, patients with a history of a spine condition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.7, 95%-confidence interval 1.2 to 2.4, P = .003) and postoperative anemia (aOR: 1.3, 95%-CI: 1.1 to 1.5, P = .004) had higher risk of PNI following rTKA. Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (aOR: 1.3, 0.78 to 2.2, P = .308), rheumatoid arthritis (aOR: 1.0, 95%-CI: 0.68 to 1.6, P = .865), and history of knee dislocation (aOR: 1.1, 95%-CI: 0.85 to 1.5, P = .412), were not significantly associated with higher risk for PNI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a 0.56% incidence of PNI following rTKA, and patients who had preexisting spine conditions or postoperative anemia were at an increased risk for this complication. Orthopedic surgeons may use the results of this study to appropriately counsel patients on the potential for a PNI following rTKA.

Can phrenic nerve injury be anticipated by larger cryoballoons?

Recently, a novel size-adjustable cryoballoon has been introduced in clinical practice, which can be inflated to two different diameters (28 and 31 mm). The 31 mm cryoballoon is specifically designed to achieve better contact with remodeled pulmonary veins (PVs) that have wider ostia while avoiding deep cannulation, thereby potentially reducing the risk of phrenic nerve injury (PNI) associated with deep balloon cannulation. However, we encountered two cases of PNI during cryoballoon ablation using the novel system among our initial 25 consecutive case series. Herein, we present two cases that exhibited PNI during freezing of the right superior PV with a size-adjustable balloon. While larger balloons are expected to create a larger area of isolation, the safety of this novel balloon system needs to be evaluated in a large-scale clinical study.

Risk avoidance of screw-induced suprascapular nerve injury in arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and reliable anatomical landmark analysis of Latarjet surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Shoulder dislocation represents a prevalent category within joint dislocation, accounting for about 40% of all joint dislocations, and anterior dislocation stands out as the prevailing type. It has been reported that in 1.6% of patients, the Latarjet procedure performed under arthroscopy involves transferring the coracoid process to the anterior-inferior aspect of the glenoid and fixing it with two bicortical screws. The tip of the screws may impinge the suprascapular nerve located behind the scapula, resulting in shoulder pain and weakness. This study was performed to analyze the risk of suprascapular nerve (SSN) injury caused by bicortical screws during arthroscopic Latarjet surgery and to identify reliable anatomical landmarks for Latarjet surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dissection was conducted on 23 fresh adult intact shoulder joint specimens, and the experimental protocol complied with the hospital's ethical requirements for research. Using the glenoid clock face as a reference, the distances between the suprascapular nerve and the anterior edge of the glenoid were measured at the 12:00, 11:00, 10:00, and 9:00 positions, as well as at the level of the suprascapular notch and the level of the spinoglenoid notch. The distances between the suprascapular nerve and the narrowest point of the glenoid rim and the clock scale were recorded. The scapula was divided into three zones, and the number of nerve branches in each zone was recorded. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis. The suprascapular nerve trunk and branches were marked using radiopaque lines, and measurements were taken at three positions in computed tomography horizontal scans: the suprascapular foramen, the spinoglenoid notch, and the point of entry of the outermost nerve branch into the muscle. RESULTS: The suprascapular nerve originates from the brachial plexus, passes downward and backward through the suprascapular foramen, closely adheres to the bone surface, and runs outward and downward deep to the supraspinatus muscle. The distances between the suprascapular nerve and the glenoid rim at the 12:00, 11:00, 10:00, and 9:00 positions were 335.18±2.31 mm, 28.23±3.47 mm, 22.32±2.78 mm, and 22.12±2.07 mm, respectively. There was a mean of 1.12 nerve branches in zone 1, 2.86 in zone 2, and 3.64 in zone 3. In the neutral position of the shoulder joint, the horizontal distance between point A and the axillary nerve was 27.37 (19.80, 34.55) mm, and the vertical distance was 16.67 (12.85, 20.35) mm. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bicortical screws, especially upper screws, for Latarjet fixation at the level of the spinoglenoid notch, is associated with the risk of suprascapular nerve injury. The narrowest distance between the glenoid rim and the suprascapular nerve was found between 9:00 and 9:30 at the glenoid clock surface. Therefore, caution should be exercised when performing any procedure related to this area. Overall, the Latarjet procedure is a reliable and effective surgical technique, providing benefits such as favorable positioning of the coracoid graft and low bone absorption rate, while also avoiding the potential for suprascapular nerve injury.

Mechanisms, interventions at risk and clinical presentation of iatrogenic nerve lesions in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic nerve lesions during surgical interventions are avoidable complications that may cause severe functional impairment. Hereby, awareness of physicians and knowledge of structures and interventions at risk is of utmost importance for prevention. As current literature is scarce, we evaluated all patients treated surgically due to peripheral nerve injuries in our specialized nerve center for the presence of iatrogenic nerve lesions. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 5026 patients with peripheral nerve injuries treated over a time period of 8 years in our facility for the prevalence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, their clinical presentations, time to treatment, mechanisms and intraoperative findings on nerve continuity. RESULTS: A total of 360 (6.1%) patients had an iatrogenic cause resulting in 380 injured nerves. 76.6% of these lesions affected the main branch of the injured nerve, which were mainly the radial (30.5%), peroneal (13.7%) and median nerve (10.3%). After a mean delay of 237 ± 344 days, patients presented 23.2% with a motor and 27.9% with a mixed sensory and motor deficit. 72.6% of lesions were in-continuity lesions. Main interventions at risk are displayed for every nerve, frequently concerning osteosyntheses but also patient positioning and anesthesiologic interventions. DISCUSSION: Awareness of major surgical complications such as iatrogenic nerve injuries is important for surgeons. An often-seen trivialization or "watch and wait" strategy results in a huge delay for starting an adequate therapy. The high number of in-continuity lesions mainly in close proximity to osteosyntheses makes diagnosis and treatment planning a delicate challenge, especially due to the varying clinical presentations we found. Diagnostics and therapy should therefore be performed as early as possible in specialized centers capable of performing nerve repair as well as salvage therapies.

Utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in detecting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgical correction of spinal deformity has been shown to reduce iatrogenic injury in pediatric and adult populations. Although motor-evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG) have been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in detecting spinal cord and nerve root injuries, their utility in detecting motor and sensory nerve root injury in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains unknown. PURPOSE: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of unimodal and multimodal IONM in the surgical management of HGS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for treatment of HGS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on patient demographics, spinopelvic and spondylolisthesis parameters, and the presence of pre-and postoperative neurological deficits were collected. METHODS: Intraoperative MEP, SSEP, and EMG alerts were recorded. Alert criteria were defined as a change in amplitude of more than 50% for MEP and/or SSEP, with or without change in latency, and more than 10 seconds of sustained EMG activity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each modality and the combination of MEP and SSEP. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method. RESULTS: Fifty-four pediatric patients with HGS undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2021 in a single tertiary center were included. Seventy-two percent (39/54) of patients were female; the average age of patients was 13.7±2.3 years. The sensitivity of MEP in detecting new postoperative neurologic deficit was 92.3% (95% CI [64.0-99.8]), SSEP 77.8% (95% CI [40.0-97.2]), EMG 69.2% (95% CI [38.6-90.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 100% (95% CI [73.5-100]). The specificity of MEP was 80.0% (95% CI [64.4-91.0]), SSEP 95.1% (95% CI [83.5-99.4]), EMG 65.9% (95% CI [49.4-79.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 82.9% (95% CI [67.9-92.9]). The accuracy of SSEP was 92.0% (95% CI [80.8%-97.8%]), and the combination of MEP and SSEP was 86.8% (95% CI [74.7%-94.5%]). Twelve (22.2%) patients had a new motor or sensory deficit diagnosed immediately postoperatively. Nine patients made a full recovery, and 3 had some neurologic deficit on final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Unimodal IONM using SSEP and MEP alone were accurate in diagnosing sensory and motor nerve root injuries, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in predicting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric HGS improved further with the use of multimodal IONM (combining MEP and SEP). We recommend the utilization of multimodal IONM in all HGS PSF surgeries.

Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: sección de grandes vasos sanguíneos y estructuras nerviosas / Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Accidental Injury to Major Blood Vessels and Nerve Structures

En el presente artículo de la serie «Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos» se aborda la sección quirúrgica accidental de grandes vasos sanguíneos y estructuras nerviosas. Se aborda, en primer lugar, la localización anatómica y recorrido de las distintas estructuras vasculares y nerviosas de más riesgo. A continuación, se explican las consecuencias de dicha lesión. Por último, se emiten algunas recomendaciones para evitar el daño accidental de las estructuras en dichas áreas de riesgo y se plantean algunas maniobras terapéuticas de reparación ante un eventual daño (AU)

This article in the series «Safety in Dermatologic Procedures» deals with the accidental laceration of major blood vessels and nerve structures during surgery. We first look at the anatomic location and course of the blood vessels and nerve structures that are most at risk of injury and then describe the possible outcomes in each case. We finally offer some recommendations on how to avoid damage to structures in danger zones and how to repair them if they are accidentally compromised (AU)

[Translated article] Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Accidental Injury to Major Blood Vessels and Nerve Structures / Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: sección de grandes vasos sanguíneos y estructuras nerviosas

This article in the series «Safety in Dermatologic Procedures» deals with the accidental laceration of major blood vessels and nerve structures during surgery. We first look at the anatomic location and course of the blood vessels and nerve structures that are most at risk of injury and then describe the possible outcomes in each case. We finally offer some recommendations on how to avoid damage to structures in danger zones and how to repair them if they are accidentally compromised (AU)

En el presente artículo de la serie «Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos» se aborda la sección quirúrgica accidental de grandes vasos sanguíneos y estructuras nerviosas. Se aborda, en primer lugar, la localización anatómica y recorrido de las distintas estructuras vasculares y nerviosas de más riesgo. A continuación, se explican las consecuencias de dicha lesión. Por último, se emiten algunas recomendaciones para evitar el daño accidental de las estructuras en dichas áreas de riesgo y se plantean algunas maniobras terapéuticas de reparación ante un eventual daño (AU)

Suprascapular nerve injury after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: correlation with screw out of vault penetration and functional situation: prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Baseplate screws have been suggested as a possible cause of suprascapular neuropathy after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to investigate the association between screw penetration out of the vault, electromyographic study, and the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 31 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy were prospectively enrolled. They were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. All patients underwent computed tomography 6 months postoperatively to determine the extraosseous position of the screws (perforation of the second bone cortex and protrusion into the supra- or infraspinatus fossa). Electrodiagnostic evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to stablish any relation between cortex perforation of the screw and suprascapular nerve (SSN) injury. Clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively (Constant score, ranges of motion, and visual analog scale) of patients with and without documented injury were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (45.2%) had an abnormal preoperative SSN electrodiagnostic study (chronic or disuse injuries), and 6 patients (19.4%) had an abnormal postoperative study (acute injury). Of the 6 patients, 2 cases appeared over the pre-existing lesion and 4 appeared over an intact preoperative nerve, all of them affecting the infraspinatus branch of the SSN. Perforation of the second cortex was detected for 60% of superior screws and 40% of posterior screws. The mean lengths of the superior and posterior screws were 30 and 18.2 mm, respectively. Patients with screw perforation of the second cortex were assessed as having a high risk of nerve injury (40% vs. 9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SSN injuries do not have a significant clinical impact and do not predispose to an acute postoperative SSN lesion. The Constant score and visual analog scale score for patients with acute SSN injuries were not statistically different from those without SSN injury. The extraosseous position of the screw increases the probability of an SSN injury to 31%. This risk is higher with the posterior screw, which leads us to question whether it is really necessary to use it.

Characterizing peroneal nerve injury clinicoradiological patterns with MRI in patients with sciatic neuropathy and foot drop after total hip replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Sciatic nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty (THA) predominantly affects the peroneal division of the sciatic nerve, often causing a foot drop. This can result from a focal etiology (hardware malposition, prominent screw, or postoperative hematoma) or nonfocal/traction injury. The objective of this study was to compare the clinicoradiological features and define the extent of nerve injury resulting from these two distinct mechanisms. METHODS: Patients who developed a postoperative foot drop within 1 year after primary or revision THA with a confirmed proximal sciatic neuropathy based on MRI or electrodiagnostic studies were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts: group 1 (focal injury), including patients with an identifiable focal structural etiology, and group 2 (nonfocal injury), including patients with a presumed traction injury. Patient demographics, clinical examinations, subsequent surgeries, electrodiagnostic study results, and MRI abnormalities were noted. The Student t-test was used to compare time to onset of foot drop and time to secondary surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, treated by one surgeon, met inclusion criteria (8 men and 13 women; 14 primary THAs and 7 revision THAs). Group 1 had a significantly longer time from THA to the onset of foot drop, with a mean of 2 months, compared with an immediate postoperative onset in group 2 (p = 0.02). Group 1 had a consistent pattern of localized focal nerve abnormality on imaging. In contrast, the majority of patients in group 2 (n = 11) had a long, continuous segment of abnormal size and signal intensity of the nerve, while the other 3 patients had a segment of less abnormal nerve in the midthigh on imaging. All patients with a long continuous lesion had Medical Research Council grade 0 dorsiflexion prior to secondary nerve surgeries compared with 1 of 3 patients with a more normal midsegment. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct clinicoradiological findings in patients with sciatic injuries resulting from a focal structural etiology versus a traction injury. While there are discrete localized changes in patients with a focal etiology, those with traction injuries demonstrate a diffuse zone of abnormality within the sciatic nerve. A proposed mechanism involves anatomical tether points of the nerve acting as points of origin and propagation for traction injuries, resulting in an immediate postoperative foot drop. In contrast, patients with a focal etiology have localized imaging findings but a highly variable time to the onset of foot drop.

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: a classification proposal.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) include several conditions in which one or more peripheral nerves are damaged. Trauma is one of the most common causes of PNIs and young people are particularly affected. They have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on the healthcare system, while timing and type of surgical treatment are of the utmost importance to guarantee the most favorable functional recovery. To date, several different classifications of PNIs have been proposed, most of them focusing on just one or few aspects of these complex conditions, such as type of injury, anatomic situation, or prognostic factors. Current classifications do not enable us to have a complete view of this pathology, which includes diagnosis, treatment choice, and possible outcomes. This fragmentation sometimes leads to an ambiguous definition of PNIs and the impossibility of exchanging crucial information between different physicians and healthcare structures, which can create confusion in the choice of therapeutic strategies and timing of surgery. MATERIALS: The authors retrospectively analyzed a group of 24 patients treated in their center and applied a new classification for PNI injuries. They chose (a) five injury-related factors, namely nerve involved, lesion site, nerve type (whether motor, sensory or mixed), surrounding tissues (whether soft tissues were involved or not), and lesion type-whether partial/in continuity or complete. An alphanumeric code was applied to each of these classes, and (b) four prognostic codes, related to age, timing, techniques, and comorbidities. RESULTS: An alphanumeric code was produced, similar to that used in the AO classification of fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose this novel classification for PNIs, with the main advantage to allow physicians to easily understand the characteristics of nerve lesions, severity, possibility of spontaneous recovery, onset of early complications, need for surgical treatment, and the best surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: according to the Oxford 2011 level of evidence, level 2.

Digital Nerve Injury: Assessment and Treatment.

Undertreated digital nerve injuries may result in sensory deficits and pain. Early recognition and treatment will optimize outcomes, and providers should maintain a high index of suspicion when assessing patients with open wounds. Acute, sharp lacerations may be amenable to direct repair while avulsion injuries or delayed repairs require adequate resection and bridging with nerve autograft, processed nerve allograft, or conduits. Conduits are most appropriate for gaps less than 15 mm, and processed nerve allografts have demonstrated reliable outcomes across longer gaps.