Early Predictors of Recovery From Nonoperatively Treated Achilles Tendon Rupture: 1 Year Follow-Up Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate early structural and mechanical predictors of plantarflexor muscle strength and the magnitude of Achilles tendon (AT) nonuniform displacement at 6 and 12 months after AT rupture. METHODS: Thirty-five participants (28 males and 7 females; mean ± SD age 41.7 ± 11.1 years) were assessed for isometric plantarflexion maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and AT nonuniformity at 6 and 12 months after rupture. Structural and mechanical AT and plantarflexor muscle properties were measured at 2 months. Limb asymmetry index (LSI) was calculated for all variables. Multiple linear regression was used with the 6 and 12 month MVC LSI and 12 month AT nonuniformity LSI as dependent variables and AT and plantarflexor muscle properties at 2 months as independent variables. The level of pre- and post-injury sports participation was inquired using Tegner score at 2 and 12 months (scale 0-10, 10 = best possible score). Subjective perception of recovery was assessed with Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) at 12 months (scale 0-100, 100=best possible score). RESULTS: Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA) symmetry at 2 months predicted MVC symmetry at 6 and 12 months after rupture (ß = 2.530, 95% CI 1.041-4.018, adjusted R2 = 0.416, p = 0.002; ß = 1.659, 95% CI 0.330-2.988, adjusted R2 = 0.418, p = 0.016, respectively). At 12 months, participants had recovered their pre-injury level of sports participation (Tegner 6 ± 2 points). The median (IQR) ATRS score was 92 (7) points at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Greater asymmetry of ATRA in the early recovery phase may be a predictor of plantarflexor muscle strength deficits up to 1 year after rupture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research is a part of "nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in Central Finland: a prospective cohort study" that has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03704532).

[Clinical effects of early rehabilitation treatment after repair surgery of skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by extensor tendon injury on the back of hand].

Objective: To explore the clinical effects of early rehabilitation treatment after repair surgery of skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by extensor tendon injury on the back of hand. Methods: This study was a retrospective non-randomized controlled study. From February 2015 to February 2023, 24 patients (15 males and 9 females, aged 12-55 years) with skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by extensor tendon injury on the back of hand, who met the inclusion criteria and were repaired with flap transplantation and tendon grafting or tendon anastomosis, were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. According to different intervention time for postoperative rehabilitation treatment of patients, the patients were divided into conventional rehabilitation group and early rehabilitation group, with 12 cases in each group. Patients in early rehabilitation group received rehabilitation treatment immediately after surgery under the rehabilitation guidance of specialized rehabilitation physicians based on the characteristics of different postoperative periods. Patients in conventional rehabilitation group began rehabilitation treatment from the third week after surgery, and their rehabilitation treatment was the same as that of patients in early rehabilitation group from the second week after surgery. The patients in 2 groups were treated in the hospital until the sixth week after surgery. The occurrence of flap vascular crisis and tendon rupture were observed within 6 weeks after surgery. After 6 weeks of surgery, the manual muscle test was used to measure the pinching force between the index finger and thumb, lateral pinching force, three-point pinching force, and grip force of the affected hand; the total action motion method was used to evaluate the finger joint range of motion of the affected hand, and the excellent and good ratio was calculated; the Carroll upper extremity function test was used to score and rate the function of the affected hand. Results: Within 6 weeks after surgery, only 1 patient in conventional rehabilitation group suffered from venous crisis, and the flap survived after the second surgical exploration and anastomosis of blood vessels; there was no occurrence of tendon rupture in patients of 2 groups. After 6 weeks of surgery, there were no statistically significant differences in pinching force between the index finger and thumb, lateral pinching force, three-point pinching force, or grip force of the affected hand between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); the excellent and good ratio of the finger joint range of motion of the affected hand of patients in early rehabilitation group was 11/12, which was higher than 7/12 in conventional rehabilitation group, but there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05); the affected hand function score of patients in early rehabilitation group was 90±6, which was significantly higher than 83±8 in conventional rehabilitation group (t=2.41, P<0.05); the function rating of the affected hand of patients in early rehabilitation group was obviously better than that in conventional rehabilitation group (Z=2.04, P<0.05). Conclusions: Early rehabilitation treatment for patients with skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by extensor tendon injury on the back of hand after repair surgery can improve hand function, but it would not increase surgery related complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a significant injury that can require surgery and can have the risk of re-rupture even after successful treatment. Consequently, to minimize this risk, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the rehabilitation protocol and the impact of different rehabilitation approaches on preventing re-rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent team members searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on operative treatment of ATR. We included articles that covered open or minimally invasive surgery for ATR, with a detailed rehabilitation protocol and reports of re-rupture. The study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO and has been reported in the line with PRISMA Guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C85 , Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C86 and assessed using AMSTAR Tool, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C87 . RESULTS: A total of 43 RCTs were eligible for the meta-analysis, encompassing a combined cohort of 2553 patients. Overall, the postoperative incidence of ATR patients developing re-rupture was 3.15% (95% CI: 2.26-4.17; I2 =44.48%). Early immobilization group patients who had ATR had a 4.07% (95% CI: 1.76-7.27; I2 =51.20%) postoperative incidence of re-rupture; Early immobilization + active range of motion (AROM) group had an incidence of 5.95% (95% CI: 2.91-9.99; I2 =0.00%); Early immobilization + weight-bearing group had an incidence of 3.49% (95% CI: 1.96-5.43; I2 =20.06%); Early weight-bearing + AROM group had an incidence of 3.61% (95% CI: 1.00-7.73; I2 =64.60%); Accelerated rehabilitation (immobilization) group had an incidence of 2.18% (95% CI: 1.11-3.59; I2 =21.56%); Accelerated rehabilitation (non-immobilization) group had a rate of 1.36% (95% CI: 0.12-3.90; I2 =0.00%). Additionally, patients in the immediate AROM group had a postoperative re-rupture incidence of 3.92% (95% CI: 1.76-6.89; I2 =33.24%); Non-immediate AROM group had an incidence of 2.45% (95% CI: 1.25-4.03; I2 =22.09%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests the use of accelerated rehabilitation intervention in early postoperative rehabilitation of the Achilles tendon. However, for early ankle joint mobilization, it is recommended to apply after one to two weeks of immobilization.

Progression of partial to complete ruptures of the Achilles tendon during rehabilitation: A study using a finite element model.

Substantial research on complete Achilles tendon ruptures is available, but guidance on partial ruptures is comparatively sparse. Conservative management is considered acceptable in partial tendon ruptures affecting less than 50% of the tendon's width, but supporting experimental evidence is currently lacking. Using a previously validated finite element model of the Achilles tendon, this study aimed to assess whether loading conditions simulating an early functional rehabilitation protocol could elicit progression to a complete rupture in partial ruptures of varying severity. In silico tendon rupture simulations were performed to locate the most likely rupture site for least, moderate, and extreme subtendon twist configurations. These three models were split at the corresponding rupture site and two sets of partial ruptures were created for each, starting from the medial and lateral sides, and ranging from 10% to 50% loss of continuity. Simulations were conducted with material parameters from healthy and tendinopathic tendons. Partial ruptures were considered to progress if the volume of elements showing a maximum principal strain above 10% exceeded 3 mm3. To assess whether the tendinopathic tendons typical geometric characteristics could compensate for the inferior material properties found in tendinopathy, an additional model with increased cross-sectional area in the free tendon region was developed. Progression to complete ruptures occurred even with less than a 50% loss of continuity, regardless of subtendon twisting, and material parameters. The tendinopathic tendon model with increased cross-sectional area showed similar results. These findings suggest the current criteria for surgical treatment of partial ruptures should be reconsidered. Statement of clinical significance: The clinical significance and most appropriate treatment of partial ruptures of the Achilles tendon is unclear. Despite the widespread use of the "50% rule" in treatment decisions of partial tendon ruptures, experimental evidence supporting it is missing. The present study provides new data, from a validated aponeurotic and free Achilles tendon finite element model, showing that partial ruptures may progress to complete ruptures under loading conditions elicited from functional rehabilitation protocols, even for partial ruptures affecting less than 50% of the tendon's width. Under these novel findings, the current criteria for surgical treatment of partial ruptures should be reconsidered.

Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Return to play (RTP) and functional outcomes are critical to treatment success for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This systematic review and meta-analysis explored treatment superiority essential in optimal treatment selection concerning individual patients and their expectations regarding RTP and functional outcomes. This study was in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The included studies were assessed regarding the level and quality of evidence. Fixed-effects models were employed for I2 < 25% and random-effects models for I2 ≥ 25%. The RTP rate meta-analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment revealed no significant difference. This was similar to the subgroup analysis of open repair and conservative treatment. The RTP rate and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) meta-analysis of open repair + earlier rehabilitation (ER) vs + later rehabilitation (LR) also revealed no significant differences. The mean time to RTP meta-analysis of open repair + ER vs + LR showed that open repair + ER was significantly favored (-4.19 weeks; p = .002). The ATRS meta-analysis of conservative treatment with ER vs with LR revealed no significant difference. This meta-analysis has revealed that the RTP rates following treatment of AATR are high. Therefore, the decision for surgical vs conservative treatment or open repair + ER vs + LR for AATR should not be selected based on the expectation of RTP. However, open repair + ER can be advocated over + LR for reduced mean time to RTP.

Rehabilitation exercise program after surgical treatment of patellar tendon rupture: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: This case report describes in detail a rehabilitation and exercise program following surgical treatment of patellar tendon rupture and offers postoperative therapeutic goals and recommendations, with the aim of expediting the resumption of activities of daily living and sports participation following the surgical procedure. In addition, this report analyzes the cause of the patellar tendon rupture in this case. DESIGN: Case report. PARTICIPANTS: The patient, a 25-year-old male recreational athlete (height: 184 cm; weight: 80 kg; right-hand dominant), experienced a complete rupture of the patellar tendon upon landing on the left lower extremity during an unopposed dribble turn. REHABILITATION EXERCISE PROGRAM: A well-structured rehabilitation program was implemented. Passive knee flexion range of motion (ROM) exceeded 90° at week 5 and was fully recovered at week 16. A second surgery was performed at week 19 to remove the decompression wires, and the patient progressively resumed basic physical and specialized training at 7 months post-surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphometric and functional tests were performed to measure the effectiveness of rehabilitation throughout the postoperative process. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical repair and an immediate postoperative rehabilitation program have a positive impact on knee ROM, function, and muscle strength. The causes of the patellar tendon rupture in this patient included long-standing uncontrolled patellar tendinopathy, impaired mobility of the ankle and hip joints, poor landing technique, and muscle strength imbalances.

The effect of mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries after primary surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mirror therapy and to provide a clinical basis for better functional recovery in the rehabilitation of patients with flexor tendon injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were included and randomly divided between two groups: mirror therapy and conventional treatment. A physical therapy program consisting of whirlpool, ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was applied to both groups. In the mirror therapy group, flexor tendon gliding, blocking exercises, joint range of motion and resistance exercises were performed with the healthy hand via a mirror. In the conventional treatment group, the same exercises were performed with the affected hand without mirror. This treatment was continued for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. Joint range of motion, handgrip strength, pain, functionality, dexterity and kinesiophobia were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: More improvement was observed in the mirror therapy group in terms of pain on visual analog scale, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (p = 0.025, p = 0.004, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups for the other parameters (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, Purdue Pegboard test, total active range movement, or handgrip strength: p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that mirror therapy in postoperative rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries is more effective than conventional in terms of reducing the severity of pain and restoring hand function.

Conservative treatment outcome for Achilles tendon re-rupture occurring in the subacute phase after primary repair.

INTRODUCTION: Until now, a treatment protocol for Achilles tendon re-rupture (ATRR) occurring in the postoperative period 5-12 weeks following primary Achilles tendon repair has not been established. We refer to this time frame as the subacute postoperative phase, and the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of conservative treatment for subacute ATRR in this phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 390 cases (385 patients) who had undergone primary Achilles tendon repair using the 4-strand Krachow method between January 2010 and August 2021. All patients were subjected to more than 12 months of follow-up and were categorized into two groups based on the presence of subacute ATRR: Group 1 comprised 370 cases without ATRR, while Group 2 comprised 20 cases with ATRR. Following confirmation of ATRR, we immediately applied a below-knee cast in an ankle plantar flexed position (25°-30°), followed by bracing according to the same rehabilitation plan used for the primary repair. After administering conservative treatment to the patients with ATRR, we compared several outcome parameters between the two groups, including isokinetic plantar flexion power measured using a dynamometer, time required for a single heel raise (t-SHR), time needed for ten repetitive SHRs (t-SHR10), Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores. The baseline timepoints for Groups 1 and 2 were the dates of the primary repair and the re-injury event. RESULTS: After primary Achilles tendon repair, subacute ATRR occurred in 5.1% of patients. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of t-SHR and t-SHR10 (P = 0.281, 0.486). Similarly, the isokinetic dynamometer measurements revealed no significant differences in peak torque for plantar flexion at angular velocities of 30°/s and 120°/s, both in absolute values and as a percentage of the contralateral side, between the groups (P > 0.05 for each). However, ATRSs were significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 before 6 months (P < 0.05), as were FAAM-Activities of Daily Living scores at 6 months (P < 0.05). After 12 months, there were no significant differences in these scores between the two groups (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment for subacute ATRR following primary Achilles tendon repair yields clinical outcomes comparable to those without ATRR. Therefore, we recommend that surgeons consider relying on the patient's natural healing capabilities rather than opting for aggressive surgical interventions, as expediting such operations may be unnecessary for subacute injuries.

Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography of tension after zone II flexor tendon repair: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary flexor tendon repairs of lacerations in zone II of the hand are fraught with problems. Traditionally, exercise (active and passive), orthoses, and physical agents are common interventions for the rehabilitation of patients experiencing these issues. One area of focus in this field is how to safely utilize tension to lengthen gliding distance following zone II injury. Finding effective solutions in this area is a key priority for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. PURPOSE: To identify the optimal immobilization position that meets safety standards for tension and is the most efficient, and consequently, to validate our clinical effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was adopted for the first part of the research (Research 1). A prospective, parallel, 2-group, randomized trial was conducted with concealed allocation and single blinding in the second part of the research (Research 2). METHODS: A total of 60 healthy adults were recruited to select the best-fit protective immobilization position in Research 1, which was confirmed by tendon tension (via Young's modulus) and excursion (via gliding distance). We then randomly assigned 45 patients after zone II flexor tendon repair into two groups in Research 2 to compare functional outcomes. The control group underwent the conventional modified Duran protocol with early passive motion, while the experimental group received the protocol (optimized by Research 1) with early active motion. Ultrasonography was used to measure the tension and excursion of the flexor tendons. The outcomes measured at 16 weeks post-repair included total active motion, strength, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Strickland scores. RESULTS: Three participants were unable to participate in Research 2 due to medical issues and poor attendance. The investigation found that the safe tendon threshold was 345.09 ± 87.74 kPa for partial active digital motion among the 60 participants. The optimal immobilization position requires the wrist to be neutral with a flexion angle of 30° at the metacarpophalangeal joint. The grip strengths (p = 0.012), ratio of grip strength (p = 0.015), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (p = 0.036), and total active motion (p = 0.023) differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Protective immobilization of the wrist in a neutral flexion position and with the metacarpophalangeal joint flexed at 30° can secure the repaired flexor tendon safely and efficiently. The effects of an early active motion protocol may improve the grip strength and upper limb mobility of individuals after zone II flexor tendon repair. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000030592.

Implementing an internal audit to change practice: Current evidence and review of patient outcomes enabled transition to the relative motion extension approach in the postoperative management of zones IV-VI extensor tendon repairs.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports use of the relative motion extension (RME) approach following extensor tendon repairs in zones V-VI yielding good or excellent outcomes. PURPOSE: To demonstrate how a 3-year internal audit and regular review of emerging evidence guided our change in practice from our longstanding use of the Norwich Regimen to the RME approach using implementation research methods. We compared the outcomes of both approaches prior to the formal adoption of the RME approach. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical audit. METHODS: A prospective audit of all consecutive adult finger extensor tendon repairs in zones IV-VII rehabilitated in our tertiary public health hand centre was undertaken between November 2014 and December 2017. Each audit year, outcomes were reviewed regarding the Norwich regimen and the RME early active motion approaches. As new evidence emerged, adjustments were made to our audit protocol for the RME approach. Discharge measurements of the range of motion of the affected and contralateral fingers and complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the 3-year audit, data was available on 79 patients (56 RME group including 59 fingers with 71 tendon repairs; 23 Norwich group including 28 fingers with 34 tendon repairs) with simple (n = 68) and complex (n = 11) finger extensor tendon zones IV-VI repairs (no zone VII presented during this time). Over time, the practice pattern shifted from the Norwich Regimen approach to the RME approach (and with the use of the RME plus [n = 33] and RME only [n = 23] approaches utilized). All approaches yielded similar good to excellent outcomes per total active motion and Miller's classification, with no tendon ruptures or need for secondary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: An internal audit of practice provided the necessary information regarding implementation to support a shift in hand therapy practice and to gain therapist or surgeon confidence in adopting the RME approach as another option for the rehabilitation of zone IV-VI finger extensor tendon repairs.

Rehabilitation following flexor tendon injury in Zone 2: a randomized controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare an early active motion (EAM) regimen to a modified Kleinert passive motion therapy in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with regards to range of motion (ROM), grip strength and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Seventy-two patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, we found no difference in total active motion (TAM) between the EAM and the Kleinert groups (median 195.5°, range 115°-273° versus median 191.5°, range 113°-260°), but a significantly better grip strength (median 76%, range 44%-99% versus median 54%, range 19%-101%; p < 0.0005) in the EAM group. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as patient-reported weakness, cold intolerance and problems in daily activities also favoured the EAM group. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in TAM, grip strength or any of the PROMs used. We conclude that EAM leads to a quicker recovery in terms of grip strength and PROMs, but that both regimens lead to similar results at 12 months.Level of evidence: I.

Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The relative motion (RM) orthosis was introduced over 40 years ago for extensor tendon rehabilitation and more recently applied to flexor tendon repairs. PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the evidence for RM orthoses following surgical repair of finger extensor and flexor tendon injuries including indications for use, configuration and schedule of orthosis wear, and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched eight databases and five trial registries, from database inception to January 7, 2022. The protocol was registered prospectively (CRD42020211579). We identified studies describing patients undergoing rehabilitation using RM orthoses after surgical repair of acute tendon injuries of the finger and hand. RESULTS: For extensor tendon repairs, ten studies, one trial registry and five conference abstracts met inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes of 521 patients with injuries in zones IV-VII. Miller's criteria were predominantly used to report range of motion; with 89.6% and 86.9% reporting good or excellent outcomes for extension lag and flexion deficit, respectively. For flexor tendon repairs, one retrospective case series was included reporting outcomes in eight patients following zones I-II repairs. Mean total active motion was 86%. No tendon ruptures were reported due to the orthosis not protecting the repair for either the RME or RMF approaches. DISCUSSION: Variation was seen in use of RME plus or only, use of night orthoses and orthotic wear schedules, which may be the result of evolution of the RM approach. Since Hirth et al's 2016 scoping review, there are five additional studies, including two RCTs reporting the use of the RM orthosis in extensor tendon rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: There is now good evidence that the RM approach is safe in zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs. Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs. Further high-quality clinical studies are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

Relative motion flexion following zone I-III flexor tendon repair: Concepts, evidence and practice.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review and case series. INTRODUCTION: The relative motion approach has been applied to rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Positioning the affected finger(s) in relatively more metacarpophalangeal joint flexion is hypothesized to reduce the tension through the repaired flexor digitorum profundus by the quadriga effect. It is also hypothesized that altered patterns of co-contraction and co-inhibition may further reduce flexor digitorum profundus tension, and confer protection to flexor digitorum superficialis. METHODS: We reviewed the existing literature to explore the rationale for using relative motion flexion orthoses as an early active mobilization strategy for patients after zone I-III flexor tendon repairs. We used this approach within our own clinic for the rehabilitation of a series of patients presenting with zone I-II flexor tendon repair. We collected routine clinical and patient reported outcome data. RESULTS: We report published outcomes of the clinical use of relative motion flexion orthoses with early active motion, implemented as the primary rehabilitation approach after zone I-III flexor digitorum repairs. We also report novel outcome data from 18 patients. DISCUSSION: We discuss our own experience of using relative motion flexion as a rehabilitation strategy following flexor tendon repair. We explore orthosis fabrication, rehabilitation exercises and functional hand use. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently limited evidence informing use of relative motion flexion orthoses following flexor tendon repair. We highlight key areas for future research and describe a current pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

A systematic review of the patient reported outcome measures utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving achilles tendon ruptures.

BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving Achilles tendon ruptures. However, the characteristics of these PROMs and current practices has not yet been reported. We hypothesize that there will be heterogeneous PROM usage in this context. METHODS: A PubMed and Embase systematic review was performed including all dates up to July 27th, 2022, assessing Achilles tendon ruptures in level 1 studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines where applicable. Inclusion criteria were all randomized controlled clinical studies involving Achilles tendon injuries. Studies that: (1) were not level 1 evidence (including editorial, commentary, review, or technique articles), (2) omitted outcome data or PROMs, (3) included injuries aside from Achilles tendon ruptures, (4) involved non-human or cadaveric subjects, (5) were not written in English, and (6) were duplicates were excluded. Demographics and outcome measures were assessed in the studies included for final review. RESULTS: Out of 18,980 initial results, 46 studies were included for final review. The average number of patients per study was 65.5. Mean follow up was 25 months. The most common study design involved comparing two different rehabilitation interventions (48 %). Twenty different outcome measures were reported including the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) (48 %), followed by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle score Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS-AH) (46 %), the Leppilahti score (20 %), and the RAND-36/Short Form (SF) - 36/SF-12 scores (20 %). An average of 1.4 measures were reported per study. CONCLUSION: Significant heterogeneity exists in PROM usage among level 1 studies involving Achilles tendon ruptures, which prevents meaningful interpretation of these data across multiple studies. We advocate for usage of at least the disease-specific Achilles Tendon Rupture score and a global, quality of life (QOL) survey such as the SF-36/12/RAND-36. Future literature should provide more evidence-based guidelines for PROM usage in this context. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Systematic Review.

Six-Strand Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Repairs With and Without Circumferential Sutures: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes in flexor pollicis longus tendon repairs with 6-strand core sutures with and without circumferential sutures. METHODS: A 6-strand core suture technique with and without circumferential sutures was used. Thirty-three patients were summarized in the C group (circumferential group) and 16 patients in the NC group (non-circumferential group). After the surgery, the wrist was stabilized with a dorsal blocking splint and a controlled early active motion protocol was applied. At weeks 6, 13, and 26 data on demographics, type of injury, surgery, postoperative rehabilitation, complications such as re-rupture and the following outcome measurements were collected: range of motion and its recovery according to the Tang criteria, Kapandji score, thumb and hand strengths, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and satisfaction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in range of motion and strength between the 2 treatment groups. In both groups, the outcome measurements increased over time and they expressed similar satisfaction with the surgical treatment. In 4 patients of the C group tendon repair ruptured and in 1 patient of the NC group. CONCLUSIONS: Six-strand repair technique is an effective procedure to assure early active motion after flexor pollicis longus tendon injuries and good results can also be achieved by omitting the circumferential suture.

Early active movement with relative motion flexion splint for the management of zone 1-2 flexor tendon repairs: Case series.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature evidence on the use of relative motion flexion splint after flexor tendon repairs. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to report the clinical use of early active movement with a relative motion flexion splint and to determine the outcomes of a consecutive series in patients with zone 1-2 flexor tendon repair. METHODS: We included 14 patients with one-stage flexor tendon repair. An active rehabilitation program was initiated in the first week with a static dorsal block splint, which was removed in the third week, and patients started to use the relative motion flexion splint. Total active motion (TAM) of the injured finger at 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery was assessed as described by Strickland and Glogovac. RESULTS: The mean TAM of the injured fingers was as follows: 102.5 ± 41.49° (25°-180°) at week 8; 123.42 ± 40.94° (45°-190°) at week 12; and 148 ± 38.18° (90°- 200°) at week 16. Final TAM grades of the patients at week 16 were as follows: excellent (six patients); good (five patients); and fair (three patients). There were no tendon ruptures and secondary surgeries. CONCLUSION: Early active movement and the use of relative motion flexion splint seem to be promising strategies for flexor tendon zone 1-2 repair management.

Rates of Operative Management for Achilles Tendon Rupture Over the Last Decade and the Influence of Gender and Age.

BACKGROUND: With emerging evidence supporting functional rehabilitation for Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs), this study sought to evaluate the treatment trends for patients sustaining an acute ATR and whether gender and age may influence the rates of operative repair. METHODS: A retrospective database review identified ATRs from 2010 through 2019. Patients were then stratified into three cohorts based on age (18-30, 30-45, and 46 and older), separated by gender, and then assessed whether patients were treated operatively or not. Cochran-Armitage Trend test was performed to analyze the trends of operative management. Chi-square analyses were performed to assess whether the proportion of patients who received operative management in each age cohort differed from 2010 to 2019. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether gender influenced treatment. RESULTS: Over the previous decade, the total rates of operative treatment for ATR significantly decreased (18.3%-12.3%, P < .0001). Each individual age cohort experienced a proportional decrease in operative management when comparing 2010 with 2019 (all P < .0001). Within all age cohorts, males were significantly more likely to receive operative treatment for an ATR over the previous decade (odds ratios: 2.63-3.22). Conclusion. Overall rates of operative management for ATR decreased across all cohorts likely due to previous studies providing evidence of similar results between operative and nonoperative managements. Over the previous decade, males were demonstrated to be far more likely than females to undergo operative management. Why females are less likely to receive an operation for ATR is likely multi-factorial and requires further exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Outcomes of early versus late functional weight-bearing after the acute Achilles tendon rupture repair with minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal postoperative rehabilitation regimen for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) remains unclear. It is important to evaluate whether early functional weight-bearing rehabilitation program after minimally invasive repair results in an earlier return to pre-injury activity but increases the risk of re-rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 68 AATR patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. 34 patients were enrolled in early weight­bearing mobilization accelerated rehabilitation group (AR group); 34 patients were enrolled in the traditional rehabilitation (TR) group. Outcomes measures included American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) score and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) score before surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, incidence rate of Achilles tendon re-rupture and total complications, length of hospital stay, time return to work and sports. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative basic data between the two groups. However, AOFAS score and ATRS score were better in AR group than TR group at 3 months postoperatively (92.4 ± 3.5 vs 88.3 ± 4.5, P < 0.01; 91.1 ± 4.4 vs 88.9 ± 3.4, P = 0.03, respectively), the mean length of hospital stay (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 7.6 ± 2.0 days, P < 0.01) and time return to work (4.5 ± 1.0 vs 7.5 ± 1.6 weeks, P < 0.01) were shorter in AR group than in TR group. No statistical significance was calculated in patient-reported outcomes during the rest of the follow-up time and complications. CONCLUSION: Early accelerated rehabilitation with weight-bearing in patients with AATR after minimally invasive surgery results in better early functional outcomes and shows similar security and feasibility. REGISTRATION NO: ChiCTR2100043398.

A retrospective analysis of controlled active motion (CAM) versus modified Kleinert/Duran (modKD) rehabilitation protocol in flexor tendon repair (zones I and II) in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze primary flexor tendon repair results in zones I and II, comparing the rupture rate and clinical outcomes of the controlled active motion (CAM) protocol with the modified Kleinert/Duran (mKD) protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery with traumatic flexor tendon lacerations in zones I and II were divided in three groups according to the type of rehabilitation protocol and period of management: group 1 included patients who underwent CAM rehabilitation protocol with six-strand Lim and Tsai suture after May 2014. Group 2 and 3 included patients treated by six-strand Lim Tsai suture followed by a modified Kleinert/Duran (modK/D) protocol with additional place and hold exercises between 2003 and 2005 (group 2) and between 2011 and 2013 (group 3). RESULTS: Rupture rate was 4.7% at 12 weeks in group 1 (3/63 flexor tendon repairs) compared to 2% (1/51 flexor tendon repairs) in group 2 and 8% in group 3 (7/86 flexor tendon repairs). The grip strength at 12 weeks was significantly better in group 2 compared to the group 1 (35 kg/25 kg, p = 0.006). The TAM in group 1 [113° (30-175°)] was significantly worse (p < 0.001) than the TAM in group 2 [141° (90-195°)] but with similar extension deficits in both groups. The assessment of range of motion by the original Strickland classification system resulted in 20% excellent and 15% good outcomes in the CAM group 1 compared with 42% and 36% in the modK/D group 2. Subanalysis demonstrated improvement of good/excellent results according to Strickland from 45% at 3 months to 63.6% after 6-month follow-up in the CAM group. CONCLUSION: The gut feeling that lead to change in our rehabilitation protocol could be explained by the heterogenous bias. A precise outcome analysis of group 1 could underline that in patients with complex hand trauma, nerve reconstruction, oedema or early extension deficit, an even more intensive and individual rehabilitation has to be performed to achieve better TAM at 6 or 12 weeks. Our study explicitly demonstrated a significant better outcome in the modK/D group compared to CAM group. This monocenter study is limited by its retrospective nature and the low number of patients.