Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 649
Filtrar
1.
J Spec Oper Med ; 24(2): 24-33, 2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865656

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often underreported or undetected in prehospital civilian and military settings. This study evaluated the incidence of TBI within the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) system. METHODS: We reviewed PHTR and the linked Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) records of casualties from January 2003 through May 2019 for diagnostic data and surgical reports. RESULTS: A total of 709 casualties met inclusion criteria. The most common mechanism was blast, including 328 (51%) in the non-TBI and 45 (63%) in the TBI cohorts. The median injury severity scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 5 and 14, respectively. The survival scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 98% and 92%, respectively. Subdural hematomas, followed by subarachnoid hemorrhages were the most common classifiable brain injuries. Other nonspecific TBIs occurred in 85% of the TBI cohort casualties. Seventy-two cases (10%) were documented by the Role 1 clinician. Based on coding or operative data, 15 of the 72 (21%) were identified as TBIs. Of the 637 cases, which could not be decided based on coding or operative data, TBI was suspected in 42 (7%) cases based on Role 1 records. CONCLUSIONS: Over 1 in 10 casualties presenting to a Role 1 facility had a TBI requiring transfer to a higher level of care. Our findings suggest the need for improved diagnostic technologies and documentation systems at Role 1 facilities for accurate TBI diagnosis and reporting.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Incidencia , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Hematoma Subdural/epidemiología
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13004, 2024 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844514

RESUMEN

Blast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries represent a significant portion of patients with vascular trauma in countries where there are higher rates of war-related violence. These injuries are especially challenging in resource-limited countries due to early diagnosis and transfer delays. This report aimed to present our experience regarding the surgical management and outcome of such injuries at a major referral vascular surgery centre in the country. A retrospective descriptive review of 326 patients with blast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries managed during a five-year period between April 2018 and April 2023. The demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vascular injury, Anatomical location, time to the operation, length of hospital stay, amount of blood products given, concomitant neuroskeletal injuries, development of Vascular injury associated acute kidney injury, surgical procedures performed and patient outcome were reviewed. In this study, 326 patients with 445 vascular injuries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the patients were male 92.3%, and the mean age was 28.3 ± 9.9 years. The gunshot mechanism of vascular injury was implicated in 76.1% of the injuries, and explosive-induced injury was 78 (23.9%). 193 (59.2%) of the patients had isolated arterial injuries, 117 (35.9%) patients had combined arterial and venous injuries while 18 (4.9%) patients had isolated venous injuries. The most commonly injured arteries were the femoral artery, followed by Brachial and popliteal artery injuries (26.1%, 23.5% and 19.4%, respectively). The median time to revascularization was 8.8 ± 8.7 h. 46.8% of the patients had Concomitant fractures, while 26.5% had Concomitant nerve injuries. Only three patients had temporary non-heparin-bound shunts during their arrival. The most common surgical intervention in arterial injuries was reversed saphenous vein graft 46.1%. The mortality was 5.8% and 7.7% of the patients needed secondary amputation. The majority of wartime arterial injuries are a result of Blast and gunshot vascular injuries. Frequent need for autologous vein grafts should be considered to manage such injuries. Results are encouraging despite delays in intervention; therefore, all viable limbs should be revascularized, keeping in mind the long-term functionality of the limb.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos por Explosión/cirugía , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
4.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 62(270): 99-102, 2024 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409985

RESUMEN

Introduction: Fireworks can cause severe ocular injuries which can be prevented if used with proper precautions. It causes not only mechanical injuries but also thermal and chemical injuries. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of ocular firework injuries among patients presented to the emergency department during festival season in a tertiary eye hospital. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study done among patients presenting in the emergency department of a tertiary eye hospital after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Data of patients from medical records between 26 October 2021 to 28 November 2021 and 15 October 2022 to 17 November 2022 was collected. A convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval. Results: Among 132 patients, the prevalence of ocular firework injuries was seen in 73 (55.30%) (46.82-63.78, 95% Confidence Interval). Closed globe injury was mostly observed in 56 (76.71%) patients with ocular injuries. The most common age group affected was those less than 30 years old 54 (73.97%). Conclusions: The prevalence of ocular firework injuries was found to be lower than other studies done in similar settings. Protective measures should be used to prevent ocular injuries. A public awareness program needs to be launched before such festivals. Keywords: festivals; injuries; prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones Oculares , Humanos , Adulto , Vacaciones y Feriados , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Estudios Transversales , Incidencia , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales , Centros de Atención Terciaria
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(5): 2223-2233, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189970

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Determine the prevalence of otological symptoms and tympanic membrane perforation, healing rates of tympanic membrane perforation with surgical and conservative management, and hearing function in civilian victims of terrorist explosions. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with searches on Medline, Embase, EMCare and CINAHL for publications between the 1st January 1945 and 26th May 2023. Studies with quantitative data addressing our aims were included. This review is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020166768. Among 2611 studies screened, 18 studies comprising prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included. RESULTS: The percentage of eardrums perforated in patients admitted to hospital, under ENT follow up and attending the emergency department is 69.0% (CI 55.5-80.5%), 38.7% (CI 19.0-63.0%, I2 0.715%) and 21.0% (CI 11.9-34.3%, I2 0.718%) respectively. Perforated eardrums heal spontaneously in 62.9% (CI 50.4-73.8%, I2 0.687%) of cases and in 88.8% (CI 75.9-96.3%, I2 0.500%) of cases after surgery. Common symptoms present within one month of bombings are tinnitus 84.7% (CI 70.0-92.9%, I2 0.506%), hearing loss 83.0% (CI 64.5-92.9%, I2 0.505%) and ear fullness 59.7% (CI 13.4-93.4%, I2 0.719). Symptomatic status between one and six months commonly include no symptoms 57.5% (CI 46.0-68.3%), hearing loss 35.4% (CI 21.8-51.8%, I2 0.673%) and tinnitus 15.6% (CI 4.9-40.0%, I2 0.500%). Within one month of bombings, the most common hearing abnormality is sensorineural hearing loss affecting 26.9% (CI 16.9-40.1%, I2 0.689%) of ears 43.5% (CI 33.4-54.2%, I2 0.500) of people. CONCLUSION: Tympanic membrane perforation, subjective hearing loss, tinnitus, ear fullness and sensorineural hearing loss are common sequelae of civilian terrorist explosions.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva , Terrorismo , Acúfeno , Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica , Humanos , Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica/epidemiología , Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica/etiología , Acúfeno/epidemiología , Explosiones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/etiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/epidemiología
6.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 142(1): 33-38, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38095891

RESUMEN

Importance: Fireworks can cause vision-threatening injuries, but the association of local legislation with the mitigation of these injuries is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the odds of firework-related ocular trauma among residents of areas where fireworks are permitted vs banned. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center in Seattle, Washington, among 230 patients presenting with ocular trauma in the 2 weeks surrounding the Independence Day holiday, spanning June 28 to July 11, over an 8-year period (2016-2022). Exposures: Firework ban status of patient residence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds of firework-related injuries among residents of areas where fireworks are legal vs where they are banned, calculated as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Results: Of 230 consultations for ocular trauma during the study period, 94 patients (mean [SD] age, 25 [14] years; 86 male patients [92%]) sustained firework-related injuries, and 136 (mean [SD] age, 43 [23] years; 104 male patients [77%]) sustained non-firework-related injuries. The odds of firework-related ocular trauma were higher among those living in an area where fireworks were legal compared with those living in an area where fireworks were banned (OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.2-3.5]; P = .01). In addition, the odds of firework injuries were higher for patients younger than 18 years (OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.7-5.8]; P < .001) and for male patients (OR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.5-7.1]; P = .004). Firework injuries were more likely to be vision threatening (54 of 94 [57%]) compared with non-firework-related injuries (54 of 136 [40%]; OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.2-3.5]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: This case-control study suggests that the odds of firework-related ocular trauma were slightly higher among residents of areas where fireworks were legal compared with residents of areas where fireworks were banned. Although these results suggest that local firework bans may be associated with a small reduction in the odds of firework-related ocular trauma, additional studies are warranted to assess what actions might lead to greater reductions.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones Oculares , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Vacaciones y Feriados , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Mil Med ; 189(3-4): e795-e801, 2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756615

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal research regarding the pre- and post-separation experience has been relatively limited, despite its potential as a major life transition. Separating from the military and re-integration to civilian life is noted to be a period of increased risk of significant adjustment challenges, which impacts a service member in a multitude of areas. Active duty service members with combat-related physical or mental health or pre-existing adjustment conditions may be more likely to separate from service and more at risk for post-military service adjustment problems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis from a prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicohort study involving deployed service members originally enrolled between 2008 and 2013 in combat or following medical evacuation to Landstuhl, Germany. Two combat-deployed cohorts were examined: non-head-injured control without blast exposure (n = 109) and combat-related concussion arising from blast (n = 165). Comprehensive clinical evaluations performed at 1 year and 5 year follow-up included identical assessment batteries for neurobehavioral, psychiatric, and cognitive outcomes. In addition to demographics collected at each study visit, the current analysis leveraged the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E), a measure of overall global disability. For neurobehavioral impairment, the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS) was used as well as the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) to assess headache burden. To compare psychiatric symptom burden between those separated to those still serving, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) for depression were used as well as the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (MAST) to be able to compare alcohol misuse across groups. Overall cognitive function/performance was defined for each service member by aggregating the 19 neuropsychological measures. RESULTS: Overall comparisons following adjustment by linear regression and correction for multiple comparisons by separation status subgroup for non-blast control or blast traumatic brain injury (TBI) identified significant differences at 5 years post-enrollment in measures of global disability, neurobehavioral impairment, and psychiatric symptom burden. Those who separated had worse global disability, worse neurobehavioral symptoms, worse Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms, and worse depression symptoms than active duty service members. While service members who sustain a mild blast TBI during combat are more likely to separate from service within 5 years, there is a proportion of those non-injured who also leave during this time frame. Clinical profiles of both groups suggest service members who separated have elevated psychiatric and neurobehavioral symptoms but not cognitive dysfunction. Interestingly, the symptom load in these same domains is lower for those without blast TBI who separated during this time frame. CONCLUSIONS: These results appear to support previous research depicting that, for some service members, transitioning out of the military and re-integrating into civilian life can be a challenging adjustment. Many factors, including personal and social circumstances, prior mental or emotional difficulties, availability of social or community support or resources, can influence the adjustment outcomes of veterans. Service members with prior adjustment difficulties and/or those with blast TBI history (and ongoing neurobehavioral symptoms) may find the transition from military to civilian life even more challenging, given the potential substantial changes in lifestyle, structure, identity, and support.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Conmoción Encefálica , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Cognición , Cefalea , Personal Militar/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Estudios Longitudinales
8.
Ophthalmologie ; 121(1): 27-35, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The handling of fireworks regularly leads to a variety of injuries affecting the periocular region. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown and a sales ban on consumer fireworks for the private sector the number of injuries massively decreased; however, a considerable increase was registered again at the last New Year festivities. The aim of this work was to present the extent and spectrum of such injuries in a maximum care center. METHODS: As part of the nationwide survey of firework-associated eye injuries in emergency care eye clinics and hospitals, data from the MHH Eye Hospital in Hannover were compiled over the period of 3 days (30.12.2022-01.01.2023) and evaluated with respect to gender, age, severity, injury pattern, type of fireworks and treatment. RESULTS: Of a total of n = 25 injured patients, n = 19 (76%) were male. Most patients presented on New Year's Day (n = 14, New Year's Eve: n = 9; 30.12.2022: n = 2), with the majority of cases presenting with mild injuries with irritation and erosion of the ocular surface (n = 15; 60%). Of the patients four sustained moderate to severe injuries with bulbar contusion, hyphema, and sometimes iris base tears (16%). Of the patients six suffered severe, mainly open, eye injuries (24%), two of which required primary evisceration. Ignition of fireworks batteries revealed the highest risk of serious injury, affecting mainly males 31-40 years of age. Children up to 12 years of age generally sustained only minor injuries, although there were exceptions as there were among adolescents. The person who caused the fireworks injury was affected in about 52% of the cases; in 48% the victim of the accident was a bystander. In cases of complex injuries, under certain conditions only surgical exploratory diagnostics could lead to the correct diagnosis and best possible care. CONCLUSION: The extent of firework injuries is manifold and the consequences including blindness are considerable. The burden on physicians on duty on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day was enormous, as with the permission of private fireworks a large number of patients had to be cared for via the emergency room, some of whom required complex surgical care. To prevent serious eye injuries, targeted education about the risks of private fireworks and possibilities to increase safety should be intensified.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , COVID-19 , Lesiones Oculares , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Universidades , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología
9.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(12): 3620-3625, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991293

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess clinical features, visual outcomes, and setting of mobile battery blast-induced eye injuries in children. METHODS: Retrospective case sheets of children with mobile battery blast injuries were reviewed at a tertiary eye care center from January 2015 to March 2022. We noted the mode of injury, battery status, and clinical presentation and analyzed the treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 14 eyes of 11 patients. Three patients (27%) had bilateral ocular injuries. The most common reasons for the blast were wiring a bulb to the battery or charging the battery with a universal mobile charger, seen in four cases each. Three eyes had closed-globe injuries (CGIs), whereas 11 had open-globe injuries (OGIs). Of the 11 eyes with OGI, four also had a retained intraocular foreign body (IOFB). Only four (36%) eyes having OGI could achieve vision better than 6/60. All three eyes with CGIs developed secondary glaucoma, and two underwent trabeculectomy. However, the visual prognosis was better (>6/36) in eyes with CGI. Overall, mean visual acuity at the final follow-up was improved to 1.41 ± 1.14 logMAR from 2.32 ± 0.76 logMAR at presentation. This was also found to be statistically significant with a P value of 0.02. CONCLUSION: Battery blast-induced ocular injuries, although rare, often lead to poor outcomes. Apart from charging, playing with discarded or damaged batteries was a common reason for battery blasts in our series.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes , Lesiones Oculares , Humanos , Niño , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones Oculares/complicaciones , Lesiones Oculares/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo/diagnóstico , Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo/epidemiología , Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo/etiología , Agudeza Visual , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pronóstico , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/etiología
10.
Mil Med ; 188(Suppl 6): 511-519, 2023 11 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948221

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is prevalent in the general population, but little is known about its prevalence in the U.S. military population. Dizziness is commonly associated with blast exposure and traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the potential independent contributions of blast and TBI have yet to be evaluated. This study's goal was to estimate the prevalence of dizziness among post-9/11 service members and Veterans and to examine independent and joint associations between military TBI history, blast exposure, and self-reported dizziness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of service members (n = 424) and recently separated (< ∼2.5 years) Veterans (n = 492) enrolled in the Noise Outcomes in Service members Epidemiology (NOISE) Study. We examined associations between self-reported history of probable TBI and blast exposure and recent dizziness using logistic regression. Models were stratified by service member versus Veteran status and adjusted to account for potentially confounding demographic and military characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 22% of service members and 31% of Veterans self-reported dizziness. Compared to those with neither TBI nor blast exposure history, both service members and Veterans with TBI (with or without blast) were three to four times more likely to self-report dizziness. Those with blast exposure but no TBI history were not more likely to self-report dizziness. There was no evidence of an interaction effect between blast exposure and a history of TBI on the occurrence of dizziness. CONCLUSION: Self-reported dizziness was prevalent in this sample of service members and Veterans. Probable TBI history, with or without blast exposure, was associated with dizziness, but blast exposure without TBI history was not. This suggests that treatment guidelines for TBI-related dizziness may not need to be tailored to the injury mechanism. However, future efforts should be directed toward the understanding of the pathophysiology of TBI on self-reported dizziness, which is fundamental to the design of treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Autoinforme , Mareo/epidemiología , Mareo/etiología , Prevalencia , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Vértigo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones
11.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(9): 715-720, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463251

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bombings are the most common cause of civilian deaths in wars, and unfortunately, a large proportion of civilian victims are children. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of blast lung injury (BLI), to evaluate lung injury patterns on tomographic images, and to document the relationship between blast lung and mortality in children exposed to the blast effect. METHODS: Thirty-six children (25.3% of pediatric patients brought to our hospital with blast injury) with BLI were included in the study. The pediatric trauma score evaluations made in the emergency department in the first admission were recorded. Lung injury findings in the computed tomography images of the patients were examined, and injuries detected in other systems were recorded. RESULTS: The most common lung injury pattern was contusion (right: 69.4%, left: 80.6%). The incidence of brain damage (52.4%) and intra-abdominal injury (76.2%) in children with low pediatric trauma score value was statistically significantly higher ( P = 0.049, P = 0.017, respectively). There was no statistically significant correlation between the presence of lung injury, injury patterns, and mortality. The incidence of brain damage in deceased patients (61.5%) was statistically significantly higher than the incidence of brain damage in surviving patients (26.1%) ( P = 0.036). Low pediatric trauma score was observed in 11 (84.6%) of the deceased children and in 10 (43.5%) of the survivors ( P = 0.016). The mean age of children with hemothorax in the right lung was statistically significantly lower than those without ( P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed that pediatric BLI is common after a blast, that it is associated with other system injuries, and that a multimodal radiological approach is required in child victims.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesión Pulmonar , Humanos , Niño , Lesión Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Pulmonar/epidemiología , Lesión Pulmonar/etiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Explosiones , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Hospitalización
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 70: 46-56, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207597

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Blast injury is a unique condition that carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality, often with mixed penetrating and blunt injuries. OBJECTIVE: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of blast injuries, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence. DISCUSSION: Explosions may impact multiple organ systems through several mechanisms. Patients with suspected blast injury and multisystem trauma require a systematic evaluation and resuscitation, as well as investigation for injuries specific to blast injuries. Blast injuries most commonly affect air-filled organs but can also result in severe cardiac and brain injury. Understanding blast injury patterns and presentations is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and balance treatment of competing interests of patients with polytrauma. Management of blast victims can also be further complicated by burns, crush injury, resource limitation, and wound infection. Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with blast injury, identification of various injury patterns and appropriate management are essential. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of blast injuries can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones Encefálicas , Traumatismo Múltiple , Humanos , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Explosiones , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones
14.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 102(9): 675-684, 2023 09.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36882096

RESUMEN

There is an increase of firework-related injuries in Germany at the turn of the year. With regard to hearing, a distinction is made between blast (BT) and explosion trauma (ET). The study examines the prevalence and characteristics of firework-related injuries and the impact of the COVID-19-pandemic pyrotechnic ban on New Year's Eve 2020/21 and 2021/22 compared to the 10-year period prior to the pandemic.A retrospective chart review of all patients who presented themselves with the diagnosis blast trauma (H 83.3) or explosion trauma (T 70.8) at the Charité emergency service in the last 12 years from Dezember 28 to January 5 was performed.276 patients were recorded, 77% of whom were male. 1/3 each were assigned to the age group 10-19 and 20-29 years. 21% of the patients were admitted to the hospital. There was an isolated BT of the ear in 67%, hand injuries in 11%, head injuries in 8% and eye injuries in 4%. 87% had ear involvement with hearing loss; 5% of these with ET.8% of the patients underwent surgical interventions. The treatment of a tympanic membrane perforation was carried out by: 54% splinting, 38% tympanoplasty. Therapy with a glucocorticoid was administered i.v. in 48%. and initiated orally in 20%. Overall, there was a nearly 75% decrease in injuries in 2020 and 2021 compared to the previous 10-year period.The use of fireworks leads to increased utilization of health care resources. The ban on the sale of pyrotechnics as well as the introduction of pyro ban zones in 2020 and 2021 led to a relevant decrease in injuries. 2020 and 2021 were the only years in which there were no injuries in children. The BT of the ear is the most common firework-related injury.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , COVID-19 , Lesiones Oculares , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Explosión/terapia , Explosiones , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/terapia
15.
HNO ; 71(Suppl 1): 44-49, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the frequency and type of firework-associated acoustic trauma occurring in Germany on New Year's Eve 2021, despite the ban on firework sales due to the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey period lasted 7 days, from 28 December 2021 to 03 January 2022. A questionnaire inquired date, type and treatment of trauma, sex, and age of the patient, and whether the trauma occurred when lighting or watching fireworks. Hearing impairment was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO grades 0 to 4), and concomitant tinnitus, vertigo, or other injuries were recorded. The questionnaire was sent to the otorhinolaryngology departments of 171 hospitals in Germany. RESULTS: Of 37 otorhinolaryngology departments, 16 reported no and 21 reported 50 patients with firework-associated acoustic trauma. Mean age was 29 ± 16 years and 41 of 50 patients were males. Of these 50 patients, 22 presented without and 28 with hearing loss, 32 reported tinnitus and 3 vertigo; 20 patients were injured when lighting fireworks and 30 when watching. Hearing impairment was classified as 14â€¯× WHO grade 0, 5â€¯× WHO grade 1, 4â€¯× WHO grade 2, 2â€¯× WHO grade 3, and 3â€¯× WHO grade 4. Inpatient treatment was received by 8 patients and 11 suffered from concomitant burn injuries. CONCLUSION: Despite the sales ban, some firework-associated acoustic traumas occurred at New Year 2021/2022 in Germany. Some instances led to hospitalization, but an even higher number of unreported cases can be assumed. This study can serve as a baseline for further annual surveys to raise the awareness of the danger of seemingly harmless fireworks for the individual.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , COVID-19 , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Relámpago , Acúfeno , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/terapia , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/epidemiología
16.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 38(5): 410-415, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730823

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of spine injuries among US service members with combat-related concussion. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of medical records for US service members injured during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2002 and 2020. The study sample included 27 897 service members categorized into 3 groups: concussion with loss of consciousness (LOC, n = 4631), concussion non-LOC ( n = 5533), and non-concussion ( n = 17 333). MAIN MEASURES: Spine injuries were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification ( ICD-9-CM ) codes and classified by body region and nature of injury using the Barell injury diagnosis matrix. Differences in prevalence of spine injuries by concussion group were evaluated using χ 2 tests. RESULTS: Spine injuries were most prevalent among service members with concussion LOC (31.1%), followed by concussion non-LOC (18.3%), and non-concussion (10.0%, P < .001). Sprains and strains were the most prevalent spine injury category, with injuries to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions significantly more prevalent in the concussion groups ( P values < .001), particularly individuals with LOC compared with non-concussion. CONCLUSION: The US military personnel with combat-related concussion, especially individuals with LOC, may also have spine injuries. Routine assessment for spine injury is recommended during concussion screening because this may impact clinical management and rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Conmoción Encefálica , Personal Militar , Humanos , Prevalencia , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología
17.
Orthopedics ; 46(3): 180-184, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626302

RESUMEN

Although prior literature has evaluated firework injuries broadly, there are no focused investigations examining trends, etiology, and costs associated with firework injuries to the hand. The 2006 to 2014 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) was used. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes identified patients presenting to the emergency department with a firework-related injury of the hand that resulted in a burn, open wound, fracture, blood vessel injury, or traumatic amputation. A linear regression model was used to identify significant changes over time, with a significance threshold of P<.05. A total of 19,473 patients with a firework-related injury to the hand were included, with no significant change in the incidence from 2006 to 2014 (7.5 per 1,000,000 population). The greatest number of injuries occurred in July (57.1%), January (7.4%), and December (3.7%). Age groups affected were young adults (18-35 years; 43.6%), older adults (36-55 years; 19.2%), adolescents (12-17 years; 18.6%), and children (0-11 years; 16.1%). Nearly 74% of the injuries resulted in burns, 24.5% resulted in open wounds, 8.0% resulted in fracture, 7.6% resulted in traumatic amputation, and 1.4% resulted in blood vessel injury. Of 14,320 burn injuries, 15.2% had first-degree burns, 69.9% had second-degree burns, and 5.1% had third-degree burns involving the skin. The median emergency department charge was $914 and the median hospitalization charge (for inpatient admittance) was $30,743. Incidence of firework-related injuries to the hand has not changed over time. There is a need for better dissemination of safety information to mitigate the occurrences of these avoidable accidents. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):180-184.].


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática , Traumatismos por Explosión , Quemaduras , Fracturas Óseas , Traumatismos de la Mano , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/complicaciones , Amputación Traumática/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Traumatismos de la Mano/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Mano/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 18(1): 44, 2023 Jan 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: War conflicts and terror-related injuries constitute a significant public health problem in Somalia. We aim to characterize and compare the injury characteristics of gunshot and blast injuries of the extremities. METHODS: The data of 333 patients with gunshot and blast injuries of the extremities over three years were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Most of the patients had injuries due to gunshot casualties compared with blast victims (n = 222, 66.7% vs. n = 111, 33.3%). Patients with gunshot wounds (GSW) had a more significant proportion of males than those with blast wounds (BW) (95.5% vs. 85.6%, P < 0.001). There were more open extremity fractures in GSW casualties (96.4% vs. 81.1%). The BW victims had significantly higher associated injuries (52.3% vs. 18.5%, P < 0.001). The BW group had a higher injury severity score (ISS ≥ 16 in 55%, P < 0.001). The need for an intensive care unit (ICU) admission was significantly higher in the BW patients (18% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.001); as well as the length of hospital stay (LOS) was higher in the BW group compared with the GW patients (> 2-week hospital stay in 31% vs. 19%, P < 0.04). About a 2.7% mortality rate was observed in BW (P < 0.014). CONCLUSION: Gunshot and explosion injuries comprise the majority of war and terror-related trauma of the extremities. These injury mechanisms differ in the body regions involved, the severity of the injury, duration of hospital stay, need for ICU admission, and mortality. Assessment and management of such devastating casualties require a complex and multidisciplinary approach.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Masculino , Humanos , Explosiones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Somalia , Extremidades , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
19.
HNO ; 71(1): 1-7, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602581

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the frequency and type of firework-associated acoustic trauma occurring in Germany on New Year's Eve 2021, despite the ban on firework sales due to the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey period lasted 7 days, from 28 December 2021 to 03 January 2022. A questionnaire inquired date, type and treatment of trauma, sex, and age of the patient, and whether the trauma occurred when lighting or watching fireworks. Hearing impairment was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO grades 0 to 4), and concomitant tinnitus, vertigo, or other injuries were recorded. The questionnaire was sent to the otorhinolaryngology departments of 171 hospitals in Germany. RESULTS: Of 37 otorhinolaryngology departments, 16 reported no and 21 reported 50 patients with firework-associated acoustic trauma. Mean age was 29 ± 16 years and 41 of 50 patients were males. Of these 50 patients, 22 presented without and 28 with hearing loss, 32 reported tinnitus and 3 vertigo; 20 patients were injured when lighting fireworks and 30 when watching. Hearing impairment was classified as 14â€¯× WHO grade 0, 5â€¯× WHO grade 1, 4â€¯× WHO grade 2, 2â€¯× WHO grade 3, and 3â€¯× WHO grade 4. Inpatient treatment was received by 8 patients and 11 suffered from concomitant burn injuries. CONCLUSION: Despite the sales ban, some firework-associated acoustic traumas occurred at New Year 2021/2022 in Germany. Some instances led to hospitalization, but an even higher number of unreported cases can be assumed. This study can serve as a baseline for further annual surveys to raise the awareness of the danger of seemingly harmless fireworks for the individual.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , COVID-19 , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Relámpago , Acúfeno , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/terapia , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/epidemiología
20.
BMJ Mil Health ; 169(2): 127-132, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243763

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is little systematic tracking or detailed analysis of investments in research and development for blast injury to support decision-making around research future funding. METHODS: This study examined global investments into blast injury-related research from public and philanthropic funders across 2000-2019. Research databases were searched using keywords, and open data were extracted from funder websites. Data collected included study title, abstract, award amount, funder and year. Individual awards were categorised to compare amounts invested into different blast injuries, the scientific approaches taken and analysis of research investment into blast traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESULTS: A total of 806 awards were identified into blast injury-related research globally, equating to US$902.1 million (m, £565.9m GBP). There was a general increase in year-on-year investment between 2003 and 2009 followed by a consistent decline in annual funding since 2010. Pre-clinical research received $671.3 m (74.4%) of investment. Brain-related injury research received $427.7 m (47.4%), orthopaedic injury $138.6 m (15.4%), eye injury $63.7 m (7.0%) and ear injury $60.5m (6.7%). Blast TBI research received a total investment of $384.3 m, representing 42.6% of all blast injury-related research. The U.S. Department of Defense funded $719.3 m (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Investment data suggest that blast TBI research has received greater funding than other blast injury health areas. The funding pattern observed can be seen as reactive, driven by the response to the War on Terror, the rising profile of blast TBI and congressionally mandated research.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Obtención de Fondos , Humanos , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Inversiones en Salud , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...