Eltrombopag can promote platelet implantation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as safely and similarly to thrombopoietin.

Background: Eltrombopag has demonstrated efficacy in treating low platelet (PLT) levels, but it remains unclear whether eltrombopag can promote PLT engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods: Forty-one HSCT patients received eltrombopag 50 mg/d from +1 day until PLT >50 × 109/L or 1 month after HSCT. Fifty-one patients in the same period received thrombopoietin (TPO) to promote PLT graft after HSCT and served as a control group. Results: A total of 51 patients who applied TPO during the same period were treated as a control. In the eltrombopag group, the median time to white blood cells (WBC) graft was 12 days (range, 10-17 days) and the PLT graft was 15 days (range, 10-30 days), whereas for the patients in the TPO group, the median time to WBC and PLT graft was 12 days (range, 9-23 days) and 15.5 days (range, 9-41 days), respectively. In the first month after HSCT, the median WBC count in the eltrombopag group was 4.41 × 109/L (range, 0.87-40.01 × 109/L) and the median PLT was 89x109/L (range, 30-401 × 109/L); the median WBC and PLT \counts in the TPO group were 4.65 × 109/L (range, 0.99-23.63 × 109/L) and 86 × 109/L (range, 5-512 × 109/L), respectively. Patients in the TPO or eltrombopag group did not experience serious side effects after drug administration, and the difference in side effects on liver and kidney function between the two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Eltrombopag is safe and similarly promotes platelet engraftment to thrombopoietin after allogeneic HSCT.

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Promotes Platelet Engraftment in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Following Treatment With Haploid Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation using Modified Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human TPO (rhTPO) promotes platelet engraftment in patients after allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT). However, the effects of rhTPO on platelet recovery after Haplo-HSCT in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) have not been intensively studied. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rhTPO on platelet engraftment in patients with SAA who were treated with Haplo-HSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). STUDY DESIGN: SAA patients who received Haplo-HSCT plus PTCy regimen were divided into the rhTPO group (with subcutaneous injection of rhTPO, n = 28) and Control group (no rhTPO administration, n = 27). The engraftment of platelet/neutrophil, platelet infusion amount, and transplant-related complications between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: All 55 patients showed successful hematopoietic reconstitution. The median time of platelet engraftment was 11 (9 to 29) days in the rhTPO group and 14 (9 to 28) days in the Control group (P = .003). The rhTPO group had a significantly reduced amount of infused platelets compared to the Control group (2 (1 to 11.5) versus 3 (1 to 14) therapeutic doses; P = .004). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding median time of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), incidence of cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, 3-yr overall survival rate, and failure-free-survival rate. No obvious adverse reactions were observed in the rhTPO group. CONCLUSION: rhTPO promoted platelet engraftment, reduced the amount of transfused platelets, and demonstrated good safety profiles without evidence of adverse reactions in patients with SAA who received Haplo-HSCT using PTCy regimen.

A real-world observation on thrombopoietic agents for patients with cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China: A multicenter, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on various thrombopoietic agents for cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) in China are lacking. This study aimed to provide detailed clinical profiles to understand the outcomes and safety of different CTIT treatment regimens. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1664 questionnaires were collected from 33 hospitals between March 1 and July 1, 2021. Patients aged >18 years were enrolled who were diagnosed with CTIT and treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11), recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO), or a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The outcomes, compliance, and safety of different treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1437 analyzable cases, most patients were treated with either rhTPO alone (49.3%) or rhIL-11 alone (27.0%). The most common combination regimen used was rhTPO and rhIL-11 (10.9%). Platelet transfusions were received by 117 cases (8.1%). In multivariate analysis, rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery, platelet transfusion, and hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) than rhIL-11 alone. No significant difference was observed in the time taken to achieve a platelet count of >100 × 109/L and chemotherapy dose reduction due to CIT among the different thrombopoietic agents. The outcomes of thrombocytopenia in 170 patients who received targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy are also summarized. The results show that the proportion of platelet recovery was similar among the different thrombopoietic agents. No new safety signals related to thrombopoietic agents were observed in this study. A higher proportion of physicians preferred to continue treatment with TPO-RA alone than with rhTPO and rhIL-11. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides an overview of CTIT and the application of various thrombopoietic agents throughout China. Comparison of monotherapy with rhIL-11, rhTPO, and TPO-RA requires further randomized clinical trials. The appropriate application for thrombopoietic agents should depend on the pretreatment of platelets, treatment variables, and risk of bleeding. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: To provide an overview of the outcome of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China, our cross-sectional study analyzed 1437 cases treated with different thrombopoietic agents. Most of the patients were treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) and recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO). rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery and platelet transfusion compared with rhIL-11.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among adults with immune thrombocytopenia receiving pharmaceutical second-line therapies: a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among individuals with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) receiving second-line therapies (rituximab, romiplostim, or eltrombopag). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database (January 2013-May 2020) among continuously enrolled patients ≥18 years prescribed second-line ITP therapies. The index date was the date of the first claim of the study medications. Treatment patterns and outcomes were measured during the 12-month follow-up period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare treatment patterns and bleeding risk outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients were included (rituximab, N = 285; romiplostim, N = 212; eltrombopag, N = 198). After IPTW, all baseline covariates were balanced. Compared to eltrombopag, patients in the rituximab cohort were 57% more likely to receive other ITP therapies (systematic corticosteroids or third-line therapies) during the follow-up period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.571, p = .030). There was no significant difference in the odds of receiving a different second-line therapy or experiencing a bleeding-related episode among three groups (p > .050). Patients in the romiplostim cohort were 69% more likely to receive rescue therapy compared to those in the rituximab cohort (OR = 1.688, p = .025). CONCLUSION: Patients with ITP receiving rituximab were more likely to need other ITP therapies but did not experience higher risk of bleeding compared to those receiving eltrombopag or romiplostim. Benefits, risks, cost-effectiveness, and patient preference should all be considered in optimizing second-line therapy for ITP.

The problem of immune thrombocytopenia refractory to both eltrombopag and romiplostim.

Immune thrombocytopenia refractory to multiple thrombopoietin receptor agonists remains a challenging clinical problem. This commentary discusses and contextualizes the recent report on this entity from Moulis and colleagues, and how to move forward with these patients. Commentary on: Moulis et al. Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France Registry. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1476-1482.

Long-term treatment with rilzabrutinib in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.

ABSTRACT: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease associated with autoantibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production, resulting in thrombocytopenia and a predisposition to bleeding. The ongoing, global phase 1/2 study showed that rilzabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically developed to treat autoimmune disorders, could be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for ITP. Clinical activity, durability of response, and safety were evaluated in 16 responding patients who continued rilzabrutinib 400 mg twice daily in the long-term extension (LTE) study. At LTE entry, the median platelet count was 87 × 109/L in all patients, 68 × 109/L in those who had rilzabrutinib monotherapy (n = 5), and 156 × 109/L in patients who received concomitant ITP medication (thrombopoietin-receptor agonists and/or corticosteroids, n = 11). At a median duration of treatment of 478 days (range, 303-764), 11 of 16 patients (69%) continued to receive rilzabrutinib. A platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L was reported in 93% of patients for more than half of their monthly visits. The median percentage of LTE weeks with platelet counts ≥30 × 109/L and ≥50 × 109/L was 100% and 88%, respectively. Five patients discontinued concomitant ITP therapy and maintained median platelet counts of 106 × 109/L at 3 to 6 months after stopping concomitant ITP therapy. Adverse events related to treatment were grade 1 or 2 and transient, with no bleeding, thrombotic, or serious adverse events. With continued rilzabrutinib treatment in the LTE, platelet responses were durable and stable over time with no new safety signals. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03395210 and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT 2017-004012-19.

Recent advances in the management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP): A comprehensive review.

Autoimmune disorders place a substantial burden on the healthcare system all over the world affecting almost 3% to 8% of the population. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), also known as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, is a blood disorder in which the body immune system destroys platelets, leading to low platelet counts in the blood (peripheral blood platelet count < 150 × 109/L). Although the pathophysiology of ITP is not fully understood, it is believed to result from a complex interplay between hereditary and environmental variables. Certain factors, such as a low platelet count, history of bleeding, and certain comorbidities can increase the risk of severe bleeding in patients with ITP. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), immunosuppressants, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are some of the advanced treatments for ITP. Although these therapies may be successful, they also carry the risk of negative effects. Recently, significant advancements have been made in the understanding and treatment of ITP. There is still much to learn about the disease, and new, more effective treatments are needed. This comprehensive review offers a comprehensive assessment of recent advancements in ITP management, with a focus on active research projects, novel therapeutic targets, new treatment modalities, and areas of uncertainty and unmet needs. According to research, it is crucial to develop individualized treatment plans for ITP patients based on their age, platelet count, risk of bleeding, and comorbidities. The article also looks at how future developments in gene editing, bispecific antibody therapies, and cellular therapy may completely change the treatment of ITP.

Face validity of the Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) in the era of thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The aim of this study was to update this previously validated tool to align with changes in clinical practice, specifically, treatment with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Children aged 1-18 with ITP and/or their families were recruited to participate in interviews to review the KIT. Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Based on interview data from children and families, current guidelines, and expert opinion, five changes were made to the KIT in order to improve its face validity.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: Evaluation of romiplostim for treatment of thrombocytopenia at a large academic medical center.

Romiplostim is indicated for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), though is often used off-label for other indications such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) and thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although romiplostim is FDA approved at a starting dose of 1 mcg/kg, it is often initiated at 2-4 mcg/kg depending on the severity of thrombocytopenia in clinical practice. Given the limited data, but interest in higher doses of romiplostim for indications other than ITP, we aimed to assess our inpatient romiplostim utilization at NYU Langone Health.This was a single-center, retrospective review of 84 adult patients from January 2019 to July 2021. The top three indications were ITP (51, 60.7%), CIT (13, 15.5%), and HSCT (10, 11.9%). The median initial romiplostim dose was 3.8 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). 51% of patients achieved a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L by the end of week 1 of therapy. For patients achieving goal platelets by the end of week 1, the median dose of romiplostim was 2.4 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). There was 1 episode of thrombosis and 1 episode of stroke.We found that higher than FDA-recommended initial doses should be considered to achieve a platelet response. It appears to be safe to initiate romiplostim as higher doses, and to increase doses by greater increments than 1 mcg/kg in order to achieve a platelet response. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in off-label indications and should evaluate clinical outcomes such as bleeding and need for transfusions.

Management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: guidance from the ISTH Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy.

Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of chemotherapy. The development of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is influenced by cancer type and therapy, occurring in approximately one-third of patients with a solid tumor diagnosis and half of all patients with a hematologic malignancy. CIT may complicate the administration of chemotherapy, leading to therapeutic delays or dose reductions. This guidance document, presented by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy, provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence and offers direction on the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in various settings of CIT, including solid tumors, acute myeloid leukemia, stem cell transplant, and lymphoma. Studies have shown that TPO-RAs can improve platelet counts in CIT, but the clinical benefits of TPO-RA in terms of reducing bleeding, limiting platelet transfusion, avoiding chemotherapy delay, or dose reduction are uncertain. Further research is needed to optimize the selection of appropriate indications and study design to manage thrombocytopenia following chemotherapy.

Thrombopoietin treats erythropoietin resistance by correcting EPO-induced progenitorcell depletion.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is a prevalent treatment for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, up to 10% of these patients exhibit EPO resistance or hyporesponsiveness, which may be caused by the depletion of erythroid progenitor cells. Thrombopoietin (TPO) has the potential to promote the growth of early progenitor cells and correct the depletion. In this study, we investigate the efficacy and the underlying mechanism of the combination therapy of TPO and EPO to EPO resistance. First, the in vivo studies suggested that intensive EPO treatment induced progenitor cell depletion in the bone marrow, where the depletion was corrected by TPO. Then, colony assays showed that EPO and TPO synergistically enhanced the burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) production but antagonistically boosted the colony-forming units of megakaryocytes (CFU-MK) production. Also, we found TPO promoted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) production, while EPO drove HSPCs toward the erythroid lineage. Additionally, EPO induced more megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors (MEPs) toward the erythroid output. Model-based simulations indicate the efficacy of this combination therapy for treating EPO-resistant anemia in rats. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the efficacy of combination therapy in addressing EPO-resistant anemia by correcting EPO-induced erythroid progenitor depletion.

Recombinant human thrombopoietin therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who do not respond to first-line treatment are limited. Few studies have reported the use of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for this subset of patients. AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of rhTPO in ITP during pregnancy and determine obstetric outcomes and predictors of treatment response. METHODS: From July 2013 to October 2022, the data of 81 pregnant women with ITP and a platelet count < 30 × 109/L who did not respond to steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, 33 received rhTPO treatment (rhTPO group) while 48 did not (control group). Baseline characteristics, haematological disease outcomes before delivery, obstetric outcomes, and adverse events were compared between groups. In the rhTPO group, a generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the factors influencing the response to rhTPO treatment. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05, both). Compared with controls, rhTPO patients had higher platelet counts (median [interquartile range]: 42 [21.5-67.5] vs. 25 [19-29] × 109/L, P = 0.002), lower bleeding rate (6.1% vs. 25%, P = 0.027), and lower platelet transfusion rate before delivery (57.6% vs. 97.9%, P < 0.001). Gestational weeks of delivery (37.6 [37-38.4] vs 37.1 [37-37.2] weeks, P = 0.001) were longer in the rhTPO group than in the control group. The rates of caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage, foetal or neonatal complications, and complication types in both groups were similar (all P > 0.05). No liver or renal function impairment or thrombosis cases were observed in the rhTPO group. GEE analysis revealed that the baseline mean platelet volume (MPV) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.522, P = 0.002) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR: 1.214, P = 0.025) were predictors of response to rhTPO treatment. CONCLUSION: rhTPO may be an effective and safe treatment option for pregnancies with ITP that do not respond to first-line treatment; it may have slightly prolonged the gestational age of delivery. Patients with a low baseline MPV and high baseline PLR may be more responsive to rhTPO treatment. The present study serves as a foundation for future research.

Patient preferences and experiences regarding thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia in The Netherlands (TRAPeze Netherlands study).

OBJECTIVE: Identify patient experience and preference towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience (TRAPeze) survey used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences and a patient burden survey (PBS) to evaluate the clinical and social impact of ITP. TRAPeze collected responses from 6th October to 19th November 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents completed the DCE: treatment preference appeared to be driven by method of administration (odds ratio [OR] 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88-6.52), frequency of dosing (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.86-2.92) and drug-food interactions (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.54-2.37). Respondents preferred therapies delivered orally over subcutaneous injection (OR 4.22; 95% CI 2.76-6.46), dosed once weekly over once daily (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.58-3.54) and without food restrictions over with restrictions (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.52-2.38). Sixty-nine respondents completed the DCE and PBS (mean [range] age 53 [19-83] years, 65% female). Seven incomplete PBS responses were excluded from analysis. Respondents were currently, or most recently, receiving eltrombopag (n = 43) or romiplostim (n = 26), of which 30% (n = 21/69) had previously received another TPO-RA. Loss (29%, n = 6/21) and lack (29%, n = 6/21) of response were the most common reasons for switching TPO-RA. Only 28% (n = 18/65) of respondents felt their TPO-RA increased energy levels. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred therapies delivered orally, dosed less frequently and without food restrictions. QoL of ITP patients on TPO-RAs can be improved; the burden analyses presented can inform future efforts towards this.

Thrombopoietin level predicts the response to avatrombopag treatment for persistent thrombocytopenia after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Persistent thrombocytopenia (PT) has an unsatisfactory response to therapy after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of avatrombopag treatment in 69 patients with PT following haplo-HSCT and assessed whether baseline thrombopoietin (TPO) levels could predict treatment response. Overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) were defined as increased platelet levels to over 20 × 109/L or 50 × 109/L independent of platelet transfusion during or within 7 days of the end of avatrombopag treatment, respectively. The incidences of OR and CR were 72.5% and 58.0%, with a median of 11 and 29 days to OR and CR, respectively. ROC analysis suggested that the optimally discriminant baseline TPO level threshold for both OR and CR to avatrombopag was ≤ 1714 pg/mL. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline TPO level (P = 0.005) was a significant independent factor of response to avatrombopag. For patients resistant to other TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), 9/16 (56.3%) exhibited a response after switching to avatrombopag. Avatrombopag was well tolerated, and responders achieved improved overall survival (79.0% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, avatrombopag is a potential safe and effective treatment for PT after haplo-HSCT, and lower baseline TPO levels predicted a better response.

Application of recombinant human thrombopoietin in pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia: a single-center experience of four patients and literature review.

The management of pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia who fail to respond to corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin is an intractable clinical challenge because of the limited availability of evidence-based information. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) is recommended for refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). To date, however, few studies have investigated rhTPO treatment during pregnancy. We retrospectively reviewed four cases who were diagnosed with ITP and treated with rhTPO during pregnancy in our center from January 2015 to June 2020. Of the four cases, two (50%) responded to rhTPO treatment. No adverse events were noted in the newborns. Our findings indicate that rhTPO treatment is safe for patients with refractory gestational ITP, and that subcutaneous injection is a convenient delivery method that does not lead to adverse events. Thus, rhTPO may be a viable alternative treatment option for patients with refractory gestational ITP who do not respond to first-line therapies.

[Consensus on the clinical diagnosis, treatment and prevention of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China (2023 edition)].

Cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) is a common adverse event during anti-tumor treatment, of which incidence is related to tumor classification, regimens, course of chemotherapy, etc. CTIT may result in a series of events including bleeding, dose intensity reduction, chemotherapy delay, and in severe cases, even the need for platelet transfusion, ultimately affecting the implementation of treatment plan, increasing the cost of treatment, reducing treatment effect and quality of life, and leading to a poor prognosis. The treatment of CTIT should first identify the cause, assess the risk of bleeding, and then adopt treatment strategies according to the cause and severity of CTIT. The main treatments of CTIT include platelet transfusion, application of various types of platelet-producing drugs, and measures to reduce the additional loss of platelets. Among them, platelet-producing drugs mainly refer to platelet-stimulating factors, including recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), recombinant human interleukin 11(rhIL-11), and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). In addition, traditional Chinese medicine also has some assistance in raising platelets. Pharmacological prophylaxis in high-risk patients may help reduce the incidence and severity of CTIT. This consensus aims to support Chinese oncologists in the diagnosis and treatment of CTIT in China, reduce the risk of bleeding and improve the quality of life of patients.