Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 174
Filtrar
1.
Int J Neurosci ; 131(5): 445-452, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354299

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder pain is one of the common musculoskeletal complaints of the patients with spinal cord injury. Corticosteroid injection to the subacromial bursa is one of the confirmed therapies which can be guided by anatomic landmarks or ultrasound. This study is aimed to compare these two methods to find the one with the highest therapeutic impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 30 patients with paraplegic SCI suffering from shoulder pain were enrolled. They were divided into 2 groups based on 4-block randomization sampling. The first group received subacromial corticosteroid injection through anatomic landmarks; while in the second group, the injection was guided by ultrasound. VAS criterion was employed for investigation of pain severity; while the constant score was used to study the shoulder pain and function. BREF questionnaire was also applied to examine the quality of life. FINDINGS: The mean scores of VAS and Constant in both groups showed a significant improvement two months after intervention when compared with their condition before the intervention. This improvement was significantly higher in the ultrasound group. The physical, physiological and environmental health scores of BREF questionnaire as well as their total score showed a significant improvement in both groups two months after intervention. But this improvement was not significantly different between the two groups in terms of any of the items. DISCUSSION: Hence, although ultrasound-guided injection is more costly and requires higher skills in comparison with blind injection, it is significantly more effective in controlling the pain and improving the shoulder function.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Bolsa Sinovial , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Paraplejía/complicaciones , Manguito de los Rotadores , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Tendinopatía/complicaciones , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/economía , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Método Simple Ciego , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/normas , Adulto Joven
2.
Neurosurgery ; 88(3): 487-496, 2021 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parkinson disease (PD) impairs daily functioning for an increasing number of patients and has a growing national economic burden. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be the most broadly accepted procedural intervention for PD, but cost-effectiveness has not been established. Moreover, magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is an emerging incisionless, ablative treatment that could potentially be safer and even more cost-effective. OBJECTIVE: To (1) quantify the utility (functional disability metric) imparted by DBS and radiofrequency ablation (RF), (2) compare cost-effectiveness of DBS and RF, and (3) establish a preliminary success threshold at which FUS would be cost-effective compared to these procedures. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of articles (1998-2018) of DBS and RF targeting the globus pallidus or subthalamic nucleus in PD patients and calculated utility using pooled Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRS-3) scores and adverse events incidences. We calculated Medicare reimbursements for each treatment as a proxy for societal cost. RESULTS: Over a 22-mo mean follow-up period, bilateral DBS imparted the most utility (0.423 quality-adjusted life-years added) compared to (in order of best to worst) bilateral RF, unilateral DBS, and unilateral RF, and was the most cost-effective (expected cost: $32 095 ± $594) over a 22-mo mean follow-up. Based on this benchmark, FUS would need to impart UPDRS-3 reductions of ∼16% and ∼33% to be the most cost-effective treatment over 2- and 5-yr periods, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bilateral DBS imparts the most utility and cost-effectiveness for PD. If our established success threshold is met, FUS ablation could dominate bilateral DBS's cost-effectiveness from a societal cost perspective.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Anciano , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Femenino , Globo Pálido/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Núcleo Subtalámico/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(4): 636-640, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348015

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa present with advanced stage disease, due primarily to the lack of opportunities for early detection and treatment. As part of a larger effort to increase access to diagnostic and therapeutic services for women's cancers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we implemented a curriculum to train the local workforce and a program to build the supportive infrastructure for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer at a private sector health facility (Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital) in Kinshasa. STUDY DESIGN: After onsite trainings in the DRC by a US breast surgeon (RT), Congolese surgeons, general physicians, physician assistants, and nurses used the Phillips Lumify smart-phone ultrasound device to perform and interpret the results of whole breast ultrasound on symptomatic women. Surgeons were trained to perform ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy on those who met the criteria for tissue diagnosis, after which they trained nurses to do the same. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 5,211 patients were identified as having a breast abnormality on clinical breast examination. Ultrasound abnormalities were noted in 1,493 (27%) patients, of which 632 (42%) met the criteria for ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration. Pathology reports were available on 368 (58%) patients who underwent biopsy, of which 164 were malignant and 204 benign. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how the "ability to look" using smart technology can be successfully used to augment clinical breast exam and triage patients for biopsy in a resource-constrained African setting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/instrumentación , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Tamizaje Masivo/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/instrumentación , Adulto , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/economía , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/instrumentación , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/economía , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/instrumentación , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , República Democrática del Congo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Teléfono Inteligente/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/economía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos
4.
Am Heart J ; 228: 65-71, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866927

RESUMEN

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown in clinical trials, registries, and meta-analyses to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI. However, IVUS utilization remains low. An increasing number of high-risk or complex coronary artery lesions are treated with PCI, and we hypothesize that the impact of IVUS in guiding treatment of these complex lesions will be of increased importance in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events while remaining cost-effective. The "IMPact on Revascularization Outcomes of intraVascular ultrasound-guided treatment of complex lesions and Economic impact" trial (registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04221815) is a multicenter, international, clinical trial randomizing subjects to IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in a 1:1 ratio. Patients undergoing PCI involving a complex lesion are eligible for enrollment. Complex lesion is defined as involving at least 1 of the following characteristics: chronic total occlusion, in-stent restenosis, severe coronary artery calcification, long lesion (≥28 mm), or bifurcation lesion. The clinical investigation will be conducted at approximately 120 centers in North America and Europe, enrolling approximately 2,500 to 3,100 randomized subjects with an adaptive design. The primary clinical end point is the rate of target vessel failure at 12 months, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. The co-primary imaging end point is the final post-PCI minimum stent area assessed by IVUS. The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of IVUS guidance on the PCI treatment of complex lesions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(5): 1133-1140, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272240

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic surgery for benign-appearing ovarian endometrioma. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort pilot study. SETTING: Multiple centers, Spain. PATIENTS: Forty patients with suspected ovarian endometrioma identified by US, with a maximum diameter of 35 to 100 mm, of whom 33 met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The study group (n = 17) underwent US-guided aspiration plus sclerotherapy with ethanol, and the control group (n = 14) underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recurrence, complications, and direct costs were compared. One of 17 sclerotherapy patients recurred (5.9%) compared with 4 of 14 laparoscopic surgery patients (28.6%) (odds ratio 0.18, 0.01-1.53). No serious adverse effects (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were observed in the sclerotherapy group; 1 patient in the surgery group had a Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication. Median hospital direct costs were significantly lower in the sclerotherapy group than those in the surgery group-266 euros versus 2189 euros. CONCLUSION: Ethanol sclerotherapy seems to be cost-effective for endometrioma and also appears to reduce complications. In this pilot study, recurrence was not higher than with conventional surgery.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/terapia , Etanol/uso terapéutico , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Ovario/terapia , Escleroterapia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Endometriosis/patología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/economía , Enfermedades del Ovario/patología , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/economía , España , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto Joven
6.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 92(4): 215-221, abr. 2020. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-196213

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso de ultrasonografía para la inserción de catéteres centrales ha mostrado ser coste-efectivo en adultos; en neonatos se desconoce esta información. El objetivo del estudio fue comparar el coste-efectividad de la cateterización venosa umbilical guiada por ultrasonografía con la cateterización convencional en un servicio de cuidados intensivos neonatales de un hospital universitario y público. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en recién nacidos que requirieron catéter venoso umbilical antes de cumplir las primeras 24 h de vida extrauterina; se conformaron 2 cohortes históricas, una con cateterización guiada por ultrasonografía y otra con cateterización convencional. La efectividad se midió con 2 variables: colocación de posición ideal e inserción sin complicaciones. Se estimó el coste de recursos humanos y materiales (fungibles y no fungibles), la razón coste-efectividad y la razón coste-efectividad incremental; y se realizó análisis de sensibilidad. RESULTADOS: La obstrucción del catéter fue más frecuente en la cateterización guiada que en la convencional (7,7 vs. 0%, p = 0,04) y la disfunción del catéter fue superior en esta última (79 vs. 3,8%, p < 0,0001). La razón coste-efectividad de la cateterización guiada fue 153,9 euros y de la convencional 484,6 euros; la razón coste-efectividad incremental fue 45,5 euros. El análisis de sensibilidad incrementó 2,6 euros en la razón coste-efectividad de la cateterización guiada y 47 euros, en la convencional. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de la ultrasonografiacute;a para guiar la cateterización umbilical es más eficiente ya que, a pesar de suponer un mayor consumo de recursos económicos, ofreció una mayor efectividad


INTRODUCTION: Although the use of ultrasound for the insertion of central catheters has proven to be cost-effective in adults, it is not known if this is the case in the neonatal population. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided umbilical venous catheterisation with conventional catheterisation in a neonatal intensive care unit of a Public University Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on newborns that required an umbilical venous catheter before completing their first 24hours of extra-uterine life. Two retrospective cohorts were formed, including one with ultrasound-guided catheterisation and the other with conventional catheterisation. The effectiveness was measured using 2 variables: placement of ideal position and insertion without complications. The cost of human and material resources (consumable and non-consumable), the cost-effectiveness ratio, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were estimated, as well as carrying out a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Catheter obstruction was more frequent in guided catheterisation than in conventional catheterisation (7.7% vs. 0%, p = .04) and catheter dysfunction was higher in the latter (79% vs. 3.8%, p < .0001). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation was € 153.9, and €484.6 for the conventional one. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was € 45.5. The sensitivity analysis showed a € 2.6 increase in the cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation and € 47 in the conventional one. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound to guide umbilical catheterisation is more efficient than conventional catheterisation since, despite using more economic resources, it offers greater effectiveness


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Análisis Costo-Eficiencia , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/economía , Venas Umbilicales , Hospitales Universitarios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales Públicos
7.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 47(4): 543-548, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is becoming increasingly accepted as a diagnostic modality to detect elevations in intracranial pressure. As this technique becomes more widespread, methods to address the inherent operator-dependent nature of this modality will need to be developed. We propose a novel low-cost model to accurately simulate sonographic ONSD measurement for purposes of training and assessment. METHODS: We designed models composed of medical tubing of various diameters readily available from typical hospital supplies and suspended them in gelatin. The models were evaluated by ultrasound by three expert point-of-care sonographers using a standard linear array probe and technique proposed in the literature. RESULTS: This model generates faithful simulation of the ONS that closely approximates in vivo images and can be used to produce accurate, reproducible measurements. Materials are low cost and easy to acquire and assemble. CONCLUSIONS: Our model provides realistic simulated images of the ONS. Through comparison of sonographic measurements to the known tube diameters, this model serves as a promising inexpensive tool to teach the method of ultrasound assessment of ONSD or as a way to determine accuracy of this novel ultrasound technology.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Anatómicos , Vaina de Mielina , Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Humanos
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(1 Pt B): 131-136, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918869

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this study, we used time-driven activity-based costing to increase efficiency in our ultrasound-guided breast biopsy practice by understanding costs associated with this procedure. METHODS: We assembled a multidisciplinary team of all relevant stakeholders involved in ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, including a radiologist, a lead technologist, a clinical assistant, a licensed practical nurse, and a procedural support assistant. The team mapped each step in an ultrasound-guided breast biopsy from the time of scheduling a biopsy to patient checkout. We completed on average 20 time observations of each step involved in these biopsies from a provider's perspective. Using capacity cost rate, we calculated the cost of all resources including personnel, supply, room, and equipment costs. Several costly steps were identified in the process, which led to the intervention of changing our overlapping biopsy times to staggered biopsy times. Time observations for each step and cost calculations were repeated postintervention. RESULTS: Our postintervention data showed that the total time spent by the radiologist in an ultrasound breast biopsy decreased by 28%, accounting for 56% of the total cost in comparison with 63% pre-intervention. The radiologist's wait time decreased by 38%, accounting for 28% of the total cost in comparison with 35% pre-intervention. Our total cost of the procedure decreased by 20%, and the personnel cost decreased by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Time-driven activity-based costing is a practical way to calculate costs and identify non-value-added steps, which can foster strategies to improve efficiency and minimize waste.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Episodio de Atención , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
9.
J Urol ; 203(4): 699-705, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596671

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Targeted prostate biopsy devices include a 3-dimensional digital template grid to guide systematic biopsy locations. Following a template could better ensure uniform and well distributed sampling of the prostate compared to the traditional freehand biopsy approach, possibly decreasing the chance of false-negative biopsy. Thus, we determined cancer detection rates obtained by conventional freehand systematic sampling vs template mapping sampling using a magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men who underwent first line conventional or image guided prostate biopsy were identified retrospectively in an institutional review board approved protocol. Excluded from study were men with prior biopsy or treatment or fewer than 10 cores taken. Targeted cores obtained by image guided biopsy were censored from analysis to simulate systematic template biopsy. The resulting cancer detection rate was compared to that of conventional biopsy. RESULTS: We identified 1,582 patients between 2006 and 2014 who met the criteria for analysis, including 1,052 who underwent conventional biopsy and 530 who underwent template biopsy with a magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion device. Patient age, prostate specific antigen and the number of systematic cores were the same in the 2 groups. Template biopsy detected any prostate cancer in 257 of 530 men (48.5%) and clinically significant cancer in 196 (37.0%) while conventional biopsy detected any cancer in 432 of 1,052 (41.0%) (p=0.005) and clinically significant cancer in 308 (29.2%) (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Template mapping systematic biopsy detected more prostate cancer than conventional sampling in biopsy naïve men. It is a promising cost-effective alternative to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy as an upfront screening tool.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Calicreínas/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal/economía , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programas Informáticos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
10.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 92(4): 215-221, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129027

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although the use of ultrasound for the insertion of central catheters has proven to be cost-effective in adults, it is not known if this is the case in the neonatal population. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided umbilical venous catheterisation with conventional catheterisation in a neonatal intensive care unit of a Public University Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on newborns that required an umbilical venous catheter before completing their first 24hours of extra-uterine life. Two retrospective cohorts were formed, including one with ultrasound-guided catheterisation and the other with conventional catheterisation. The effectiveness was measured using 2 variables: placement of ideal position and insertion without complications. The cost of human and material resources (consumable and non-consumable), the cost-effectiveness ratio, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were estimated, as well as carrying out a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Catheter obstruction was more frequent in guided catheterisation than in conventional catheterisation (7.7% vs. 0%, p=.04) and catheter dysfunction was higher in the latter (79% vs. 3.8%, p<.0001). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation was €153.9, and €484.6 for the conventional one. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €45.5. The sensitivity analysis showed a €2.6 increase in the cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation and €47 in the conventional one. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound to guide umbilical catheterisation is more efficient than conventional catheterisation since, despite using more economic resources, it offers greater effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Venas Umbilicales , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , México , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(1): E59-E66, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31724274

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fractional flow reserve (FFR) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVES: To assess the temporal trends of IVUS, OCT, and FFR use in AMI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from the National Inpatient Sample (2004-2014) was designed to include AMI admissions that received coronary angiography. Administrative codes were used to identify percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), IVUS, OCT, and FFR. Outcomes included temporal trends, inhospital mortality and resource utilization stratified by IVUS, OCT, or FFR use. RESULTS: In 4,419,973 AMI admissions, IVUS, OCT, and FFR were used in 2.6%, 0.1%, and 0.6%, respectively. There was a 22-fold, 118-fold, and 33-fold adjusted increase in IVUS, OCT, and FFR use, respectively, in 2014 compared to the first year of use. Non-ST-elevation AMI presentation, male sex, private insurance coverage, admission to a large urban hospital, and absence of cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock were associated with higher IVUS, OCT, or FFR use. PCI was performed in 83.2% of the IVUS, OCT, or FFR cohort compared to 64.2% of the control group (p < .001). The cohort with IVUS/OCT/FFR use had lower inhospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.53 [95% confidence interval 0.50-0.56]), more frequent discharges to home (83.7% vs. 76.8%), shorter hospital stays (4.3 ± 4.4 vs. 5.0 ± 5.5 days) and higher hospitalization costs ($90,683 ± 74,093 vs. $74,671 ± 75,841). CONCLUSIONS: In AMI, the use of IVUS, OCT, and FFR has increased during 2004-2014. Significant patient and hospital-level disparities exist in the use of these technologies.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/tendencias , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/tendencias , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Angiografía Coronaria/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Estados Unidos
12.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 46(5): 682-688, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31204254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the anesthesia cost from ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks confirmed with electrostimulation for unilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) surgery in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A group of 20 dogs weighing 33.9 ± 6.0 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: All dogs were administered hydromorphone and atropine, propofol for induction of anesthesia and isoflurane for maintenance. Hydromorphone and carprofen were administered for recovery. The dogs were randomly assigned to one of two groups, lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks with ropivacaine [regional anesthesia (RA)] or sham blocks with saline [control (CON)]. Fentanyl was administered for rescue analgesia intraoperatively and postoperatively. The cost to manage anesthesia was divided into fixed and variable costs using the micro-costing method. The variable costs were compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The fixed anesthesia costs were equal between groups at US$354.00 per case. The variable anesthesia cost range was US$27.90-100.10 for RA and US$21.00-180.50 for CON. Overall, cost per dog in CON was from -US$6.9 to US$80.4 compared with RA. For 160 TPLO cases per year, hospital cost when RA is performed decreased the cost by $12,864 per year up to increased cost by $1104 per year, depending on the requirements for systemic drugs and incidence/severity of anesthesia complications. The estimated fee charge per case for service necessary to reimburse the cost of a new ultrasound (US$25,000.00) and nerve locator (US$925.00) over their life span of 6 and 10 years, respectively, is US$26.62. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks with electrostimulation confirmation can increase the anesthesia cost through use of specific equipment. However, in most cases, the anesthesia cost decreased as a result of decreased costs for pain management and treatment of complications.


Asunto(s)
Perros/fisiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/veterinaria , Bloqueo Nervioso/veterinaria , Osteotomía/veterinaria , Dolor Postoperatorio/veterinaria , Rodilla de Cuadrúpedos/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/veterinaria , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Animales , Colorado , Terapia Combinada/economía , Terapia Combinada/veterinaria , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Perros/cirugía , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/economía , Femenino , Plexo Lumbosacro , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ropivacaína/administración & dosificación , Ropivacaína/uso terapéutico , Nervio Ciático , Método Simple Ciego , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
13.
Int J Urol ; 26(8): 833-838, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31209957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost of combinations of perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block and intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block with the standard technique (periprostatic nerve block). METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized prospective controlled trial. Patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen values (prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were included in the study. Patients with anorectal diseases, chronic prostatitis, previous history of prostate biopsy and anorectal surgery were excluded from the study. A total of 148 patients (group 1 [periprostatic nerve block], n = 48; group 2 [intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block], n = 51; group 3 [perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block], n = 49) were included in the final analysis. Pain during insertion and manipulation of the transrectal ultrasound probe was recorded as visual analog scale 1, pain during penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate and sampling was recorded as visual analog scale 2, and pain during the entire procedure recorded as visual analog scale 3. RESULTS: The mean visual analog scale 1 score was significantly lower in group 3, when compared with group 1 and group 2 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean visual analog scale 2 score. The mean visual analog scale 3 score was significantly lower in group 3 when compared with other groups (P < 0.001). The total cost for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block group was significantly higher than the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of perineal pudendal nerve block and periprostatic nerve block provides more effective pain control than intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block and periprostatic nerve block alone, with similar complication rates and without increasing cost.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/economía , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/economía , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/economía , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/economía , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Nervio Pudendo/efectos de los fármacos , Recto/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
14.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 19(1): 51, 2019 04 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30967124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization is a commonly used alternative to the conventional landmark method. Because from the German perspective, the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance is unclear, this study examined the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus the landmark method for adults undergoing a central venous catheterization. METHODS: A decision-tree based model was built to estimate the costs of averted catheter-related complications. Clinical data (e.g. arterial puncture, failed attempts) were obtained from a Cochrane review and a randomized controlled trial, whilst information about cost parameters were taken from a German hospital of maximum care. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. To assess the parameter uncertainty, several sensitivity analyses were performed (deterministic, probabilistic and with regard to the model structure). RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that ultrasound guidance resulted in fewer complications per person (0.04 versus 0.17 for the landmark method) and was less expensive (€51 versus €230 for the landmark method). Results were robust to changes in the model parameters and in the model structure. Whilst our model population reflected approximately 49% of adults undergoing a central venous catheterization cannulation per year, structural sensitivity analyses (e.g. extending the study cohort to patients at higher baseline risk of complications, pediatric patients, or using real-time/indirect catheterization) indicated the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance for a broader spectrum of patients. The results should be interpreted by considering the assumptions (e.g. target population) and approximations (e.g. cost parameters) underpinning the model. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization averts more catheter-related complications and may save the resources of the German Statutory Health Insurance compared with landmark method.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
15.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 36(10): 927-931, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30884952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic pleural effusions create discomfort and are a frequent cause of hospitalization. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is a key palliative intervention to assist in the management of this vulnerable population. Our institution has created a multidisciplinary transitional care program to address the needs of those discharged from the hospital with chronic complex conditions, including symptomatic pleural effusions. METHODS: This case series was performed in a transitional care clinic between May 8, 2017, and December 11, 2018. Eight unique patients with symptomatic pleural effusions were referred to our clinic posthospital discharge and treated with ultrasound-guided thoracentesis. A retrospective review was performed to assess procedure details, complications, and follow-up emergency department visits or hospital readmissions. Additionally, cost comparison data were obtained from the hospital financial system. RESULTS: Of the 8 unique patients, 15 thoracenteses were performed over the 19-month period in the transitional care clinic. The median age of the cohort was 56 years old (range: 39-92 years). All patients reported an immediate relief of symptoms (dyspnea and/ or pain) and no procedural complications. The total cost of performing an ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in the transitional care clinic was 61.8% that of performing the procedure in the hospital (US$537.61 vs US$869.65). CONCLUSION: All 8 patients experienced an immediate relief in pleural effusion-related symptoms following thoracentesis. Our experience helps reveal the safety, efficacy, and cost-efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in providing symptom management for patients with pleural effusions in a transitional care clinic.


Asunto(s)
Derrame Pleural/terapia , Toracocentesis/métodos , Cuidado de Transición/organización & administración , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracocentesis/economía , Cuidado de Transición/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
16.
Vasc Med ; 24(2): 103-109, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834822

RESUMEN

This study retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients who received ultrasound facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UFCDT) versus systemically administered 'half-dose' thrombolysis (HDT) in 97 patients with PE. The outcomes assessed included changes in baseline pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), right ventricle/left ventricle ratio (RV/LV), cost and duration of hospitalization, death, bleeding, and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the short and intermediate term follow-up. Analyses were performed using a covariance adjustment propensity score approach to address baseline differences between groups in variables associated with PASP and RV/LV, covarying baseline scores. The baseline mean ± SE PASP dropped from 49.3 ± 1.1 to 32.5 ± 0.3 mmHg at 36 hours in the HDT group, and from 50.6 ± 1.2 to 35.1 ± 0.4 mmHg in the UFCDT group; group × time interaction p-value = 0.007. Corresponding drops in the RV/LV were from a baseline of 1.26 ± 0.05 to 1.07 ± 0.01 in the HDT group and from 1.30 ± 0.05 to 1.14 ± 0.01 in the UFCDT group at 36 hours; group × time interaction p-value = 0.269. Statistically significant decreases were noted in PASP and RV/LV for both the HDT and UFCDT at 36 hours and follow-up. PASP through follow-up was significantly lower in the HDT than the UFCDT group. Likewise, RV/LV was lower in the HDT group. The duration and cost of hospitalization were lower in the HDT group (6.2 ± 1.4 days vs 1.9 ± 0.3 days, p < 0.001; US$12,000 ± $3000 vs $74,000 ± $6000, p < 0.001). We conclude that both UFCDT and HDT lead to rapid reduction of PASP and RV/LV, whereas HDT leads to a lower duration and cost of hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/economía , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/economía , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
17.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(5): 709-714, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30773436

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements using an ultrasound and electrocardiogram-guided system versus external measurements and confirmatory chest X-rays (CXRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight guided PICC placements were performed in 63 outpatients (mean age, 43 ± 13 years; 50% male) and compared to 68 propensity score-matched PICC placements (mean age, 44 ± 13 years; 56% male) performed using external measurements by the same operators. Post-placement CXRs were used to confirm final catheter tip positioning. Cohorts were compared in terms of repositioning rates, desired tip positioning rates (in the lower third of the superior vena cava or at the cavoatrial junction), and estimated cost per PICC positioned as desired using manufacturer quotes, Medicare reimbursement rates, and hourly wages for staff time. Agreement between tip positioning according to the guided system versus CXR was also assessed. RESULTS: Guided PICC placements required less repositioning (1.5% vs 10.3%, P = .03) and resulted in more catheters positioned as desired (86.8% vs 67.6%, P = .01) than the external measurement approach. The cost per PICC positioned as desired was lower for guided placements ($318.54 vs $381.44), suggesting that the guided system was cost-effective in this clinical setting. Guided system-CXR agreement for tip position was poor (κ=0.25, P = .002) due to tips being slightly farther from the cavoatrial junction on CXR than indicated by the guided system. CONCLUSIONS: The guided PICC placement system was cost-effective in outpatients treated by a single division of interventional radiology at an academic institution.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Electrocardiografía/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Radiografía Torácica/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Electrocardiografía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión y Programación de Personal/economía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía Torácica/efectos adversos , Salarios y Beneficios , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos
18.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 45(4): 578-583, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative ultrasound guided surgery (IOUS) is an effective surgical technique for breast cancer with advantages over wire localization guided surgery (WL), enabling smaller lumpectomies without compromising margins. Nevertheless, it has had a slow implementation, maybe due to lacking a learning curve. Also differences in costs are not clearly reported. The aim of the study is to assess differences in volume of healthy breast tissue excised, to establish a learning curve and to prove it is cost saving. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2009 to April 2013, women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer eligible for IOUS or WL breast conserving surgery were recorded into a prospectively maintained database. Both groups were compared for differences in margin status, second surgeries and excess of healthy tissue resected, defined by the calculated resection ratio (CRR). A raw cost study was assessed. IOUS learning curve was analyzed using Cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM). RESULTS: The study included 214 patients, 148 (69.16%) in the IOUS group and 66 (30.84%) in the WL group. IOUS showed significantly smaller surgical volumes (p = 0.02), smaller CRR (p = 0.006), higher rate of negative margins (p = 0.017) and less surgical time (p = 0.006) than WL. Learning curves based on complete tumor excision and no need for second surgeries showed that 11 cases were enough to master the technique. Around 900€ per surgery was saved using IOUS vs. WL. CONCLUSION: IOUS decreases excision of healthy breast tissue while increasing negative margin rates compared to WL. IOUS can be easily implemented; 11 cases are enough to acquire skills for performing the technique. Savings can be up to 900€ per surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Curva de Aprendizaje , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Mastectomía Segmentaria/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Reoperación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria
19.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(2): 259-264, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717961

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate and risk factors for hemorrhage in patients undergoing real-time, ultrasound-guided paracentesis by radiologists without correction of coagulopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent real-time, ultrasound-guided paracentesis at a single institution over a 2-year period. In total, 3116 paracentesis procedures were performed: 757 (24%) inpatients and 2,359 (76%) outpatients. Ninety-five percent of patients had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Mean patient age was 56.6 years. Mean international normalized ratio (INR) was 1.6; INR was > 2 in 437 (14%) of cases. Mean platelet count was 122 x 103/µL; platelet count was < 50 x 103/µL in 368 (12%) of patients. Seven hundred seven (23%) patients were dialysis dependent. Patients were followed for 2 weeks after paracentesis to assess for hemorrhage requiring transfusion or rescue angiogram/embolization. Univariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for hemorrhage. Blood product and cost saving analysis were performed. RESULTS: Significant post-paracentesis hemorrhage occurred in 6 (0.19%) patients, and only 1 patient required an angiogram with embolization. No predictors of post-procedure bleeding were found, including INR and platelet count. Transfusion of 1125 units of fresh frozen plasma and 366 units of platelets were avoided, for a transfusion-associated cost savings of $816,000. CONCLUSIONS: Without correction of coagulation abnormalities with prophylactic blood product transfusion, post-procedural hemorrhage is very rare when paracentesis is performed with real-time ultrasound guidance by radiologists.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Coagulación Sanguínea , Hemorragia/etiología , Paracentesis/efectos adversos , Paracentesis/métodos , Radiólogos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hemorragia/sangre , Hemorragia/economía , Hemorragia/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paracentesis/economía , Recuento de Plaquetas , Radiólogos/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(36): e11962, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30200076

RESUMEN

Prostate-specific antigen is not useful for detection of prostate cancer in Chinese men. The major problems in prostate cancer patients are overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that targeted biopsy is an accurate diagnostic tool for prostate cancer detection than standard biopsy in Chinese men.Total, 998 patients whom multiparticulate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging had revealed at least 1 lesion in the prostate were included in a cohort. Patients were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy followed US-guided biopsy. Benefits of a diagnostic test were evaluated by decision curve analysis. Patients who were diagnosed as having prostate cancer by either of biopsies were subjected to radical prostatectomies followed by whole-mounted pathology (n = 578). Spearman rank correlation was performed between the biopsy results and the subtype of prostate cancer at 99% of confidence level.With respect to whole-mounted pathology, for US-guided biopsy, MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy, and combined data of both biopsies, sensitivities were 0.973, 0.983, and 0.973 and accuracies were 0.837, 0.91, and 0.917, respectively. MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy (P = .165) and combined data of both biopsies (P = .182) had the same specificity to whole-mount pathology. However, a US-guided biopsy had not the same specificity to whole-mount pathology (P = .0003). Decision-making zones for radical prostatectomy of different biopsies were in the order of combined data of both biopsies >MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy >US-guided biopsy.Only the targeted biopsy is recommended for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Biopsia/economía , China , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...