Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.019
Filtrar
1.
Brain Behav ; 14(5): e3513, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Smoking is a risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS) development, symptom burden, decreased medication efficacy, and increased disease-related mortality. Veterans with MS (VwMS) smoke at critically high rates; however, treatment rates and possible disparities are unknown. To promote equitable treatment, we aim to investigate smoking cessation prescription practices for VwMS across social determinant factors. METHODS: We extracted data from the national Veterans Health Administration electronic health records between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2018. To derive marginal estimates of the association of MS with receipt of smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy, we used propensity score matching through the extreme gradient boosting machine learning model. VwMS who smoke were matched with veterans without MS who smoke on factors including age, race, depression, and healthcare visits. To assess the marginal association of MS with different cessation treatments, we used logistic regression and conducted stratified analyses by sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The matched sample achieved a good balance across most covariates, compared to the pre-match sample. VwMS (n = 3320) had decreased odds of receiving prescriptions for nicotine patches ([Odds Ratio]OR = 0.86, p < .01), non-patch nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; OR = 0.81, p < .001), and standard practice dual NRT (OR = 0.77, p < .01), compared to matches without MS (n = 13,280). Men with MS had lower odds of receiving prescriptions for nicotine patches (OR = 0.88, p = .05), non-patch NRT (OR = 0.77, p < .001), and dual NRT (OR = 0.72, p < .001). Similarly, Black VwMS had lower odds of receiving prescriptions for patches (OR = 0.62, p < .001), non-patch NRT (OR = 0.75, p < .05), and dual NRT (OR = 0.52, p < .01). The odds of receiving prescriptions for bupropion or varenicline did not differ between VwMS and matches without MS. CONCLUSION: VwMS received significantly less smoking cessation treatment, compared to matched controls without MS, showing a critical gap in health services as VwMS are not receiving dual NRT as the standard of care. Prescription rates were especially lower for male and Black VwMS, suggesting that under-represented demographic groups outside of the white female category, most often considered as the "traditional MS" group, could be under-treated regarding smoking cessation support. This foundational work will help inform future work to promote equitable treatment and implementation of cessation interventions for people living with MS.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Esclerosis Múltiple , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 601, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that documentation of comorbidities differed when Veterans received care within versus outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Changes to medical center funding, increased attention to performance reporting, and expansion of Clinical Documentation Improvement programs, however, may have caused coding in VHA to change. METHODS: Using repeated cross-sectional data, we compared Elixhauser-van Walraven scores and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) severity levels for Veterans' admissions across settings and payers over time, utilizing a linkage of VHA and all-payer discharge data for 2012-2017 in seven US states. To minimize selection bias, we analyzed records for Veterans admitted to both VHA and non-VHA hospitals in the same year. Using generalized linear models, we adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Following adjustment, VHA admissions consistently had the lowest predicted mean comorbidity scores (4.44 (95% CI 4.34-4.55)) and lowest probability of using the most severe DRG (22.1% (95% CI 21.4%-22.8%)). In contrast, Medicare-covered admissions had the highest predicted mean comorbidity score (5.71 (95% CI 5.56-5.85)) and highest probability of using the top DRG (35.3% (95% CI 34.2%-36.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies may be needed to improve VHA documentation, and current risk-adjusted comparisons should account for differences in coding intensity.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Hospitales de Veteranos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 103, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of participatory research methods is increasing in research trials. Once partnerships are established with end-users, there is less guidance about processes research teams can use to successfully incorporate end-user feedback. The current study describes the use of a brief reflections process to systematically examine and evaluate the impact of end-user feedback on study conduct. METHODS: The Comparative Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused and Non-Trauma- Focused Treatment Strategies for PTSD among those with Co-Occurring SUD (COMPASS) study was a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of trauma-focused psychotherapy versus non-trauma-focused psychotherapy for Veterans with co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder who were entering substance use treatment within the Department of Veterans Affairs. We developed and paired a process of "brief reflections" with our end-user engagement methods as part of a supplemental evaluation of the COMPASS study engagement plan. Brief reflections were 30-minute semi-structured discussions with the COMPASS Team following meetings with three study engagement panels about feedback received regarding study issues. To evaluate the impact of panel feedback, 16 reflections were audio-recorded, transcribed, rapidly analyzed, and integrated with other study data sources. RESULTS: Brief reflections revealed that the engagement panels made recommended changes in eight areas: enhancing recruitment; study assessment completion; creating uniformity across Study Coordinators; building Study Coordinator connection to Veteran participants; mismatch between study procedures and clinical practice; therapist skill with patients with active substance use; therapist burnout; and dissemination of study findings. Some recommendations positively impact study conduct while others had mixed impact. Reflections were iterative and led to emergent processes that included revisiting previously discussed topics, cross-pollination of ideas across panels, and sparking solutions amongst the Team when the panels did not make any recommendations or recommendations were not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: When paired with end-user engagement methods, brief reflections can facilitate systematic examination of end-user input, particularly when the engagement strategy is robust. Reflections offer a forum of accountability for researchers to give careful thought to end-user recommendations and make timely improvements to the study conduct. Reflections can also facilitate evaluation of these recommendations and reveal end-user-driven strategies that can effectively improve study conduct. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04581434) on October 9, 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04581434?term=NCT04581434&draw=2&rank=1 .


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Veteranos , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicoterapia/métodos , Estados Unidos , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Proyectos de Investigación
4.
Health Serv Res ; 59(3): e14303, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553984

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) 2019 Referral Coordination Initiative (RCI) was associated with changes in the proportion of VA specialty referrals completed by community-based care (CC) providers and mean appointment waiting times for VA and CC providers. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTINGS: Monthly facility level VA data for 3,097,366 specialty care referrals for eight high-volume specialties (cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, neurology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, physical therapy, and podiatry) from October 1, 2019 to May 30, 2022. STUDY DESIGN: We employed a staggered difference-in-differences approach to evaluate RCI's effects on referral patterns and wait times. Our unit of analysis was facility-month. We dichotomized facilities into high and low RCI use based on the proportion of total referrals for a specialty. We stratified our analysis by specialty and the staffing model that high RCI users adopted: centralized, decentralized, and hybrid. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Administrative data on referrals and waiting times were extracted from the VA's corporate data warehouse. Data on staffing models were provided by the VA's Office of Integrated Veteran Care. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We did not reject the null hypotheses that high RCI use do not change CC referral rates or waiting times in any of the care settings for most specialties. For example, high RCI use for physical therapy-the highest volume specialty studied-was associated with -0.054 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.114 to 0.006) and 2.0 days (95% CI: -4.8 to 8.8) change in CC referral rate and waiting time at CC providers, respectively, among centralized staffing model adopters. CONCLUSIONS: In the initial years of the RCI program, RCI does not have a measurable effect on waiting times or CC referral rates. Our findings do not support concerns that RCI might be impeding Veterans' access to CC providers. Future evaluations should examine whether RCI facilitates Veterans' ability to receive care in their preferred setting.


Asunto(s)
Derivación y Consulta , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Listas de Espera , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración
6.
Oncologist ; 29(5): 369-376, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254242

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving atezolizumab with bevacizumab (A + B) therapy at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC who received first-line systemic therapy with A + B at the VHA between December 1, 2019, and March 1, 2022, were selected from electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Abstractors reviewed the EMR of the patients from their index date of A + B initiation until death or their last VHA visit, with the study period ending on January 31, 2023. The chi-square test was used to compare rates, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare medians. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients met the study criteria. The median age was 67 years; 99% were male, 63% were non-Hispanic Whites, 26% were Black, and 66% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥1. 84% had child Pugh score (CPS) class A, 16% had CPS classes B and C, 62% had a grade 2 albumin-bilirubin score, 56% had HCC caused by viral hepatitis, 80% had cirrhosis, and 67% had received prior local therapies. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 59%, while the 1-year PFS rate was 36%. Overall survival (OS) at 1-year was 52% in our study. CONCLUSION: In real world, despite having similar PFS as the phase III IMbrave 150 trial, our OS at 12 months was lower (52% vs. 67%) because our study included a higher proportion of elderly patients with moderate liver dysfunction and a 40% non-White. This study provided real-world outcomes that differed from the study population in a pivotal trial.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Salud de los Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Health Serv Res ; 59(3): e14280, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258310

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in dual enrollment after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion by VA priority group, (e.g., service connection), sex, and type of state expansion. STUDY SETTING: Our cohort was all Veterans ages 18-64 enrolled in VA and eligible for benefits due to military service-connection or low income from 2011 to 2016; the unit of analysis was person-year. STUDY DESIGN: Difference-in-difference and event-study analysis. The outcome was dual VA-Medicaid enrollment for at least 1 month annually. Medicaid expansion, VA priority status, whether a state expanded by a Section 1115 waiver, and sex were independent variables. We controlled for race, ethnicity, age, disease burden, distance to VA facilities, state, and year. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We used data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) regarding age and VA Priority Group to select our cohort of VA-enrolled individuals. We then took the cohort and crossed checked it with Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) and T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF) to determine Medicaid enrollment status. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Service-connected Veterans experienced lower dual-enrollment increases across all sex and state-waiver groups (3.44 percentage points (95% CI: 1.83, 5.05 pp) for women, 3.93 pp (2.98, 4.98) for men, 4.06 pp (2.85, 5.27) for non-waiver states, and 3.00 pp (1.58 to 4.41) for waiver states) than Veterans who enrolled in the VA due to low income (8.19 pp (5.43, 10.95) for women, 9.80 pp (7.06, 12.54) for men, 10.21 pp (7.17, 13.25) for non-waiver states, and 7.39 pp (5.28, 9.50) for waiver states). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion is associated with dual enrollment. Dual-enrollment changes are greatest in those enrolled in the VA due to low income, but do not differ by sex or expansion type. Results can help VA identify groups disproportionately likely to have potential care-coordination issues due to usage of multiple health care systems.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Factores Sexuales , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 64(3): 101999, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Veteran Health Administration prioritizes the distribution of naloxone to veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) to prevent deaths due to opioid-related overdose. The Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) program was created with tools to supplement efforts in identifying veterans at risk of opioid-related adverse events secondary to OUD or other comorbidities and increase access, education, and distribution of naloxone. Utilizing the OEND tool, Veteran Health Indiana (VHI) employed two different distribution initiatives to increase access to naloxone. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess naloxone distribution efforts at a VA medical center and evaluate outcomes in patients who experienced opioid overdose events before and after the OEND initiatives were implemented. The primary outcome is to assess the distribution of naloxone within the year prior to the documented overdose event before and after the OEND initiatives. Secondary outcomes include assessment of the number of naloxone doses administered during the overdose event, substances involved in the overdose, and distribution of outpatient naloxone prescriptions after the overdose event. METHODS: This study was a retrospective electronic chart review of all patients who experienced an opioid-related overdose event at VHI from March 1, 2019, to March 1, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 59 opioid-overdose events analyzed, the percentage of patients with a naloxone prescription within 12 months prior to an opioid-overdose event was similar between the pre- and post-OEND initiatives. Within 12 months following the overdose event, naloxone was dispensed to nearly 10% more patients in the post-OEND group compared to the pre-OEND group. CONCLUSIONS: The OEND initiatives increased naloxone distribution amongst patients who ultimately experienced an opioid-related overdose. Additional research is needed to assess if these efforts prevented further overdoses.


Asunto(s)
Naloxona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Sobredosis de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Veteranos , Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Sobredosis de Opiáceos/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Adulto
9.
Health Serv Res ; 58(6): 1189-1197, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37076113

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether expanded access to Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care increased overall utilization or induced a shift from other payers to VA for emergency care among VA enrollees. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This study included all emergency department (ED) encounters in 2019 from hospitals in the state of New York. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a difference-in-differences analysis comparing VA enrollees to the general population before and after the implementation of the Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act in June 2019. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We included all ED visits with individuals aged 30 or older at the time of the encounter. Individuals were considered eligible for the policy change if they were enrolled with VA at the beginning of 2019. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of the 5,577,199 ED visits in the sample, 4.9% (n = 253,799) were made by VA enrollees. Of these, 44.9% of visits were paid by Medicare, 32.8% occurred in VA facilities, and 7% were paid by private health insurance. There was a 6.4% (2.91 percentage points; std. error = 0.18; p < 0.01) decrease in the proportion of ED visits paid by Medicare among VA enrollees relative to the general population after the implementation of the MISSION Act in June 2019. This decrease was larger for ED visits with a subsequent inpatient admission (-8.4%; 4.87 percentage points; std. error = 0.33; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant change in the total volume of ED visits (0.06%; std. error = 0.08; p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging a novel dataset, we demonstrate that MISSION Act implementation coincided with a shift in the financing of non-VA ED visits from Medicare to VA without any increase in overall ED utilization. These findings have important implications for VA health care financing and delivery.


Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Veteranos , Humanos , Hospitales de Veteranos , Seguro de Salud , Medicare , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economía , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , New York , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto
10.
Womens Health Issues ; 33(4): 405-413, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105835

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are common, nonmalignant tumors that disproportionately impact Black patients. We aimed to examine Black and White differences in receipt of any treatment and type of first treatment in the Department of Veterans Affairs, including effect modification by severity as approximated by anemia. METHODS: We used Department of Veterans Affairs administrative data to identify 5,041 Black and 3,206 White veterans with symptomatic uterine fibroids, identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, Clinical Modification, codes, between fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2012 and followed in the administrative data through fiscal year 2018 for outcomes. Outcomes included receipt of any treatment, hysterectomy as first treatment, and fertility-sparing treatment as first treatment. We stratified all analyses by age (<45, ≥45 years old), used generalized linear models with a log link and Poisson error distribution, included an interaction term between race and anemia, and used recycled predictions to estimate adjusted percentages for outcomes. RESULTS: There was evidence of effect modification by anemia for receipt of any treatment but not for any other outcomes. Across age and anemia sub-groups, Black veterans were less likely to receive any treatment than White veterans. Adjusted racial differences were most pronounced among veterans with anemia (<45 years, Black-White difference = -10.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -15.9 to -4.7; ≥45 years, Black-White difference = -20.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -27.8 to -12.7). Across age groups, Black veterans were less likely than White veterans to have hysterectomy and more likely to have a fertility-sparing treatment as their first treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant Black-White disparities in receipt of treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Additional research that centers the experiences of Black veterans with uterine fibroids is needed to inform strategies to eliminate racial disparities in uterine fibroid care.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Leiomioma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Veteranos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/etnología , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Histerectomía , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Leiomioma/etnología , Leiomioma/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/etnología , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Adulto , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 211(5): 402-406, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37040142

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Justice-involved veterans are more likely to experience myriad mental health sequelae. Nonetheless, examination of personality psychopathology among justice-involved veterans remains limited, with studies focused on males within correctional settings. We examined Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical records for 1,534,108 (12.28% justice-involved) male and 127,230 (8.79% justice-involved) female veterans. Male and female veterans accessing VA justice-related services were both approximately three times more likely to have a personality disorder diagnosis relative to those with no history of using justice-related services. This effect persisted after accounting for VA use (both overall and mental health), age, race, and ethnicity. Augmenting and tailoring VA justice-related services to facilitate access to evidence-based psychotherapy for personality psychopathology may promote optimal recovery and rehabilitation among these veterans.


Asunto(s)
Derecho Penal , Trastornos de la Personalidad , Veteranos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Personalidad/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Derecho Penal/legislación & jurisprudencia
13.
South Med J ; 115(2): 158-163, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35118507

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Training healthcare workers in disaster preparedness has been shown to increase their willingness and ability to report to work during disasters. Little is known, however, about the relation between sociodemographic, household, and workforce characteristics and the desire for such training. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess healthcare workers' desire for additional workforce preparedness training, and the determinants that influence the need for such training, for three types of disasters (natural, pandemic, manmade). METHODS: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Preparedness Survey was a random, anonymous, Web-based questionnaire fielded nationwide (October-December 2018). Multivariate, logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In total, 4026 VA employees, clinical and nonclinical, responded. A total of 61% of respondents wanted additional training for natural, 63% for pandemic, and 68% for manmade disasters. VA supervisors (natural: odds ratio [OR] 1.28, pandemic: OR 1.33, manmade: OR 1.25, P < 0.05) and clinicians (natural: OR 1.24, pandemic: OR 1.24, manmade: OR 1.24, P < 0.05) were more likely to report the need for additional training. Those who reported that they understood their role in disaster response were less likely to report the need for training (natural: OR 0.25, pandemic: OR 0.27, manmade: OR 0.28, P < 0.001), whereas those who perceived their role to be important during response (natural: OR 2.20, pandemic: OR 2.78, manmade: OR 3.13, P < 0.001), and those who reported not being prepared at home for major disasters (natural: OR 1.85, pandemic: OR 1.92, manmade: OR 1.94, P < 0.001), were more likely to indicate a need for training. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying which factors encourage participation in disaster preparedness training can help hospitals and other healthcare providers create targeted training and educational materials to better prepare all hospital staff for future disasters.


Asunto(s)
Defensa Civil/educación , Personal de Salud/educación , Evaluación de Necesidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Defensa Civil/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(2): e2148593, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166781

RESUMEN

Importance: Electronic appointment reminder systems are increasingly used across health systems. However, their association with patients' waiting times for their appointments, a measure of timely access to care, has yet to be assessed. Objective: To assess the associations between the introduction of an electronic appointment reminder system and the number of days patients had to wait from appointment booking to appointment completion in patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study of patients who completed appointments from January 1, 2018, to October 13, 2018, inclusive in all 130 Veterans Affairs (VA) health centers in the US. The study population comprised a census of all patients who received care at any VA health center during the period of the study for outpatient, procedural, rehabilitation, or radiology services. Data were analyzed from May 15, 2021, to December 15, 2021. Exposures: Phased introduction of an electronic appointment reminder system (VEText) in 6 waves spread across the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The unit of observation in this study was a completed appointment made by any such patients. Observations were excluded if the appointment was booked before but completed after the exposure, or if data were duplicated, missing, or incomplete. For each completed appointment, the number of days between which the appointment was booked and when it was completed. Results: The number of observations after exclusion comprised 39.5 million completed appointments from 5.1 million patients (91.1% male) with a mean (SD) age of 62.57 (16.24) years. The adoption of VEText was associated with an estimated reduction in patient waiting time by a mean of 6.51 days (95% CI, 5.51-7.52 days). Adoption of VEText was also associated with an increase of 8.54 (95% CI, 7.65-9.44) days of additional waiting per incomplete booking. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that appointment reminder systems may be associated with decreases in the mean number of days patients in the VA system have to wait for their appointments but can potentially lengthen waiting times for patients who miss their bookings. Further study is warranted to assess whether these findings may be generalizable to other populations.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas Recordatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
15.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): e181-e188, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize system-level barriers to bariatric surgery from the perspectives of Veterans with severe obesity and obesity care providers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bariatric surgery is the most effective weight loss option for Veterans with severe obesity, but fewer than 0.1% of Veterans with severe obesity undergo it. Addressing low utilization of bariatric surgery and weight management services is a priority for the veterans health administration. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with Veterans with severe obesity who were referred for or underwent bariatric surgery, and providers who delivered care to veterans with severe obesity, including bariatric surgeons, primary care providers, registered dietitians, and health psychologists. We asked study participants to describe their experiences with the bariatric surgery delivery process in the VA system. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Four coders iteratively developed a codebook and used conventional content analysis to identify relevant systems or "contextual" barriers within Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. RESULTS: Seventy-three semi-structured interviews with veterans (n = 33) and providers (n = 40) throughout the veterans health administration system were completed. More than three-fourths of Veterans were male, whereas nearly three-fourths of the providers were female. Eight themes were mapped onto Andersen model as barriers to bariatric surgery: poor care coordination, lack of bariatric surgery guidelines, limited primary care providers and referring provider knowledge about bariatric surgery, long travel distances, delayed referrals, limited access to healthy foods, difficulties meetings preoperative requirements, and lack of provider availability and/or time. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing system-level barriers by improving coordination of care and standardizing some aspects of bariatric surgery care may improve access to evidence-based severe obesity care within VA.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Investigación Cualitativa , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/fisiopatología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología
16.
J Hepatol ; 76(2): 294-301, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34563579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with chronic HBV infection. Several HCC risk prediction models are available to guide surveillance decisions, but their comparative performance remains unclear. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort of patients with HBV treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues at 130 Veterans Administration facilities between 9/1/2008 and 12/31/2018, we calculated risk scores from 10 HCC risk prediction models (REACH-B, PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, CU-HCC, HCC-RESCUE, CAMD, APA-B, REAL-B, AASL-HCC, RWS-HCC). We estimated the models' discrimination and calibration. We calculated HCC incidence in risk categories defined by the reported cut-offs for all models. RESULTS: Of 3,101 patients with HBV (32.2% with cirrhosis), 47.0% were treated with entecavir, 40.6% tenofovir, and 12.4% received both. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 113 patients developed HCC at an incidence of 0.75/100 person-years. AUC values for 3-year HCC risk were the highest for RWS-HCC, APA-B, REAL-B, and AASL-HCC (all >0.80). Of these, 3 (APA-B, RWS-HCC, REAL-B) incorporated alpha-fetoprotein. AUC values for the other models ranged from 0.73 for PAGE-B to 0.79 for CAMD and HCC-RESCUE. Of the 7 models with AUC >0.75, only APA-B was poorly calibrated. In total, 10-20% of the cohort was deemed low-risk based on the published cut-offs. None of the patients in the low-risk groups defined by PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, AASL-HCC, and REAL-B developed HCC during the study timeframe. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of US-based patients with HBV on antiviral treatment, most models performed well in predicting HCC risk. A low-risk group, in which no cases of HCC occurred within a 3-year timeframe, was identified by several models (PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, CAMD, AASL-HCC, REAL-B). Further studies are warranted to examine whether these patients could be excluded from HCC surveillance. LAY SUMMARY: Risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) could guide HCC surveillance decisions. In this large cohort of US-based patients receiving treatment for HBV, most published models discriminated between those who did or did not develop HCC, although the RWS-HCC, REAL-B, and AASL-HCC performed the best. If confirmed in future studies, these models could help identify a low-risk subset of patients on antiviral treatment who could be excluded from HCC surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hepatitis B/fisiopatología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Med Care ; 59(12): 1082-1089, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have identified lower mortality in Black Veterans compared with White Veterans after hospitalization for common medical conditions, but these studies adjusted for comorbid conditions identified in administrative claims. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare mortality for non-Hispanic White (hereafter, "White"), non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, "Black"), and Hispanic Veterans hospitalized for heart failure (HF) and pneumonia and determine whether observed mortality differences varied according to whether claims-based comorbid conditions and/or clinical variables were included in risk-adjustment models. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was an observational study. SUBJECTS: The study cohort included 143,520 admissions for HF and 127,782 admissions for pneumonia for Veterans hospitalized in 132 Veterans Health Administration (VA) Medical Centers between January 2009 and September 2015. MEASURES: The primary independent variable was racial/ethnic group (ie, Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White), and the outcome was all-cause mortality 30 days following admission. To compare mortality by race/ethnicity, we used logistic regression models that included different combinations of claims-based, clinical, and sociodemographic variables. For each model, we estimated the average marginal effect (AME) for Black and Hispanic Veterans relative to White Veterans. RESULTS: Among the 143,520 (127,782) hospitalizations for HF (pneumonia), the average patient age was 71.6 (70.9) years and 98.4% (97.1%) were male. The unadjusted 30-day mortality rates for HF (pneumonia) were 7.2% (11.0%) for White, 4.1% (10.4%) for Black and 8.4% (16.9%) for Hispanic Veterans. Relative to White Veterans, when only claims-based variables were used for risk adjustment, the AME (95% confidence interval) for the HF [pneumonia] cohort was -2.17 (-2.45, -1.89) [0.08 (-0.41, 0.58)] for Black Veterans and 1.32 (0.49, 2.15) [4.51 (3.65, 5.38)] for Hispanic Veterans. When clinical variables were incorporated in addition to claims-based ones, the AME, relative to White Veterans, for the HF [pneumonia] cohort was -1.57 (-1.88, -1.27) [-0.83 (-1.31, -0.36)] for Black Veterans and 1.50 (0.71, 2.30) [3.30 (2.49, 4.11)] for Hispanic Veterans. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with White Veterans, Black Veterans had lower mortality, and Hispanic Veterans had higher mortality for HF and pneumonia. The inclusion of clinical variables into risk-adjustment models impacted the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in mortality following hospitalization. Future studies examining racial/ethnic disparities should consider including clinical variables for risk adjustment.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Mortalidad/etnología , Neumonía/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etnología , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2129900, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34661661

RESUMEN

Importance: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national clinical program using a suicide risk prediction algorithm, Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), in which clinicians facilitate care enhancements for individuals identified in local top 0.1% suicide risk tiers. Evaluation studies are needed. Objective: To determine associations with treatment engagement, health care utilization, suicide attempts, safety plan documentation, and 6-month mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used triple differences analyses comparing 6-month changes in outcomes after vs before program entry for individuals entering the REACH VET program (March 2017-December 2018) vs a similarly identified top 0.1% suicide risk tier cohort from prior to program initiation (March 2014-December 2015), adjusting for trends across subthreshold cohorts. Subcohort analyses (including individuals from March 2017-June 2018) evaluated difference-in-differences for cause-specific mortality using death certificate data. The subthreshold cohorts included individuals in the top 0.3% to 0.1% suicide risk tier, below the threshold for REACH VET eligibility, from the concurrent REACH VET period and from the pre-REACH VET period. Data were analyzed from December 2019 through September 2021. Exposures: REACH VET-designated clinicians treatment reevaluation and outreach for care enhancements, including safety planning, increased monitoring, and interventions to enhance coping. Main Outcomes and Measures: Process outcomes included VHA scheduled, completed, and missed appointments; mental health visits; and safety plan documentation and documentation within 6 months for individuals without plans within the prior 2 years. Clinical outcomes included mental health admissions, emergency department visits, nonfatal suicide attempts, and all-cause, suicide, and nonsuicide external-cause mortality. Results: A total of 173 313 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [14.7] years; 161 264 [93.1%] men and 12 049 [7.0%] women) were included in analyses, including 40 816 individuals eligible for REACH VET care and 36 604 individuals from the pre-REACH VET period in the top 0.1% of suicide risk. The REACH VET intervention was associated with significant increases in completed outpatient appointments (adjusted triple difference [ATD], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.55) and proportion of individuals with new safety plans (ATD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.10) and reductions in mental health admissions (ATD, -0.08; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.05), emergency department visits (ADT, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01), and suicide attempts (ADT, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.03). Subcohort analyses did not identify differences in suicide or all-cause mortality (eg, age-and-sex-adjusted difference-in-difference for suicide mortality, 0.0007; 95% CI, -0.0006 to 0.0019). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that REACH VET implementation was associated with greater treatment engagement and new safety plan documentation and fewer mental health admissions, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Clinical programs using risk modeling may be effective tools to support care enhancements and risk reduction.


Asunto(s)
Prevención del Suicidio , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2128998, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673963

RESUMEN

Importance: Transient elevations of blood glucose levels are common in hospitalized older adults with diabetes and may lead clinicians to discharge patients with more intensive diabetes medications than they were using before hospitalization. Objective: To investigate outcomes associated with intensification of outpatient diabetes medications at discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study assessed patients 65 years and older with diabetes not taking insulin who were hospitalized in the Veterans Health Administration Health System between January 1, 2011, and September 28, 2016, for common medical conditions. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. Exposure: Discharge with intensified diabetes medications, defined as filling a prescription at hospital discharge for a new or higher-dose medication than was being used before hospitalization. Propensity scores were used to construct a matched cohort of patients who did and did not receive diabetes medication intensifications. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes of severe hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia were assessed at 30 and 365 days using competing risk regressions. Secondary outcomes included all-cause readmissions, mortality, change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and persistent use of intensified medications at 1 year after discharge. Results: The propensity-matched cohort included 5296 older adults with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 73.7 [7.7] years; 5212 [98.4%] male; and 867 [16.4%] Black, 47 [0.9%] Hispanic, 4138 [78.1%] White), equally split between those who did and did not receive diabetes medication intensifications at hospital discharge. Within 30 days, patients who received medication intensifications had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (hazard ratio [HR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10-4.28), no difference in risk of severe hyperglycemia (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.33-3.08), and a lower risk of death (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.92). At 1 year, no differences were found in the risk of severe hypoglycemia events, severe hyperglycemia events, or death and no difference in change in HbA1c level was found among those who did vs did not receive intensifications (mean postdischarge HbA1c, 7.72% vs 7.70%; difference-in-differences, 0.02%; 95% CI, -0.12% to 0.16%). At 1 year, 48.0% (591 of 1231) of new oral diabetes medications and 38.5% (548 of 1423) of new insulin prescriptions filled at discharge were no longer being filled. Conclusions and Relevance: In this national cohort study, among older adults hospitalized for common medical conditions, discharge with intensified diabetes medications was associated with an increased short-term risk of severe hypoglycemia events but was not associated with reduced severe hyperglycemia events or improve HbA1c control. These findings indicate that short-term hospitalization may not be an effective time to intervene in long-term diabetes management.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 82(6)2021 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705349

RESUMEN

Objective: This study examined the effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and emergency department use among homeless veterans receiving services in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system.Methods: National VA administrative data from 2001 to 2017 were analyzed using propensity score matching to compare 1,524 homeless veterans who received ECT and 3,025 homeless veterans discharged from psychiatric inpatient units serving as matched controls.Results: Homeless veterans who received ECT were significantly less likely to have used any ED services 30 and 90 days after their first ECT session compared to homeless veterans who did not receive ECT (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.60-0.71; OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81-0.93, respectively). Homeless veterans who received ECT showed reductions in suicidal ideation and suicide attempts after ECT, but these reductions were significantly less than homeless veterans who did not receive ECT 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year later (OR = 1.48-2.00).Conclusions: ECT has the potential to reduce ED use among homeless veterans with ECT-responsive psychiatric conditions. Further study is needed on whether the treatment engagement required of ECT participants indirectly reduces use of acute services in this population.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Electroconvulsiva/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Trastornos Mentales , Veteranos/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/métodos , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...