Factores de riesgo para extravasación de contraste en colico renal / Risk factors for contrast extravasation in renal colic

INTRODUCCIÓN: La ruptura no traumatica del sistema pieloureterocalicial (PUC) es una entidad clínica poco común. La causa más frecuente esla obstrucción ureteral por patología litiásica, que sepresenta hasta en un 75%. A nuestro conocimiento, noexiste en la literatura una descripción de los posiblesfactores asociados con este evento. Nuestro objetivo esanalizar las variables asociadas con la extravasaciónde contraste endovenoso en pacientes con cólico renalpor litiasis ureteral única.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo, descriptivo, de una serie de pacientes que,en contexto de cólico renal, presentaron extravasaciónde contraste endovenoso por el sistema urinario entomografía computada (TC). Se incluyeron pacientescon litiasis ureteral única sin otra patologia asociada.Se realizó una comparación de las muestras del grupocon fuga de contraste (grupo 1) con igual número detomografías consecutivas sin fuga de contraste (grupo2) en paciente con cólico renal litiásico, en un modelode regresión logística para identificar factores de riesgo de fuga de contraste. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 117 casos de fuga decontraste desde enero de 2013 hasta julio de 2018. El86% de los litos fueron ≤ 5 mm y el 79 % se ubicaronen uréter inferior. El 72% de los pacientes presentópelvis intrarrenal. En el análisis univariado tanto ubicación en uréter inferior, litiasis ≤ 5 mm, como anatomía pielica intrarrenal aumentaron la probabilidad deextravasación. En el modelo multivariado, litiasis ≤ 5mm aumentaron cinco veces el riesgo de extravasación comparado con las mayores, la ubicación en uréter distal aumentó en tres veces y la anatomía con pelvis intrarrenal aumentó en dos veces comparado conotra ubicación y pelvis extrarrenal, respectivamente,de manera estadísticamente significativa el riesgo depresentar fuga de contraste.

INTRODUCTION: Non-traumatic rupture of the pyeloureterocaliceal system (PUC) is anuncommon clinical entity. The most frequent cause isureteral obstruction due to lithiasic pathology, whichis present in up to 75%. To our knowledge, there isno description in the literature of the possible factorsassociated with this event. Our objective is to analyzethe variables associated with intravenous contrastextravasation in patients with renal colic due to singleureteral lithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed aretrospective, descriptive analysis of a series ofpatients who, in the context of renal colic, presented endovenous contrast extravasation throughthe urinary system in computed tomography (CT).Patients with single ureteral lithiasis without otherassociated pathology were included. A comparisonof the samples from the group with contrast leakage (group 1) with an equal number of consecutiveCT scans without contrast leakage (group 2) in patients with renal colic lithiasis was performed in alogistic regression model to identify risk factors forcontrast leakage.RESULTS: There were 117 cases of contrast leakage from January 2013 to July 2018. Eighty-sixpercent of the lithiases were 5 mm and 79% werelocated in the lower ureter. 72% of patients presented with intrarenal pelvis. In the univariate analysisboth location in lower ureter, lithiasis 5 mm, andintrarenal pyelic anatomy increased the probability of extravasation. In multivariate model, 5 mmlithiasis increased five times the risk of extravasation compared to larger ones, the location in distalureter increased three times and the anatomy withintrarenal pelvis increased two times compared toother location and extrarenal pelvis, respectively, ina statistically significant way the risk of presentingcontrast leakage.CONCLUSION: In this series, we found an increased risk of contrast leakage in a lithiasic renalcolic in patients with intrarenal pelvic anatomy with lithiasis less

Ureterolithiasis in Adolescents: A Case Report.

A 13-year-old patient presented to the emergency department with a history of abdominal pain and right flank pain. Two days before, she was evaluated at her pediatrician's office and was diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis and sent home. In the emergency department, the patient was diagnosed with ureterolithiasis after a physical examination, laboratory work, and imaging findings. She was treated successfully with conservative medical management. Symptomatic presentation of ureterolithiasis can include abdominal pain, flank pain, hematuria, dysuria, urgency, nausea, and vomiting. Nurse practitioners need to recognize nonspecific symptoms of ureterolithiasis for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Risk factors, signs and symptoms, prevention, and treatment options for ureterolithiasis are discussed.

Renal pelvic rupture, intrapelvic haematoma and retroperitoneal haemorrhage associated with obstructive ureterolithiasis in a cat.

A neutered female cat presented with a 9-day history of hyporexia and depression. The referring veterinarian had identified moderate non-regenerative anaemia, haematuria and suspected unilateral obstructive ureterolithiasis. Subsequent ultrasonography revealed moderate distension of the left renal pelvis with echogenic material, ureteral distension and ureterolithiasis. A partial ureteral obstruction was suspected. After 4 days of medical management, there was further distension of the renal pelvis with well-delineated echogenic material and an accumulation of perinephric fluid. A left nephroureterectomy was performed. Renal pelvic rupture with intrapelvic haematoma and retroperitoneal haemorrhage was confirmed by histopathology. Eighteen months following surgery, the cat remained clinically well with normal renal values.

Ureterocele habitado y doble sistema incompleto / Occupied ureterocele and incomplete double collecting system

No disponible

Shared Decision Making in Patients With Suspected Uncomplicated Ureterolithiasis: A Decision Aid Development Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a decision aid (DA) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) around whether to obtain computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis. METHODS: We used evidence-based DA development methods, including qualitative methods and iterative stakeholder engagement, to develop and refine a DA. Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), and a steering committee made up of stakeholders, we conducted interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of patients, community members, emergency clinicians, and other stakeholders. We used an iterative process to code the transcripts and identify themes. We beta-tested the DA with patient-clinician dyads facing the decision in real time. RESULTS: From August 2018 to August 2019, we engaged 102 participants in the design and iterative refinement of a DA focused on diagnostic options for patients with suspected ureterolithiasis. Forty-six were ED patients, community members, or patients with ureterolithiasis, and the remaining were emergency clinicians (doctors, residents, advanced practitioners), researchers, urologists, nurses, or other physicians. Patients and clinicians identified several key decisional needs including an understanding of accuracy, uncertainty, radiation exposure/cancer risk, and clear return precautions. Patients and community members identified facilitators to SDM, such as a checklist of signs and symptoms. Many stakeholders, including both patients and ED clinicians, expressed a strong pro-CT bias. A six-page DA was developed, iteratively refined, and beta-tested. CONCLUSIONS: Using stakeholder engagement and qualitative inquiry, we developed an evidence-based DA to facilitate SDM around the question of CT scan utilization in patients with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis. Future research will test the efficacy of the DA in facilitating SDM.

Efectividad del tratamiento médico expulsivo con el bloqueador alfa tamsulosina en pacientes adultos que consultan por cálculo ureteral distal en un servicio de urgencias chileno / Effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy with the alfa-adrenergic blocker tamsulosin for distal ureterolithiasis in adults attended in an emergency department in Chile

Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento médico expulsivo con tamsulosina. Método. Ensayo clínico prospectivo aleatorizado doble ciego realizado en un servicio de urgencias. Se incluyen adultos con ureterolitiasis distal única no complicada, que fueron asignados aleatoriamente a tamsulosina 0,4 mg/día más antiinflamatorio no esteroideo (AINE) (grupo A), o con placebo más AINE (grupo B), durante 21 días. Resultados. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la tasa de expulsión de litiasis entre ambos grupos (p = 0,29) ni en el tiempo de expulsión de esta (p = 0,91). Conclusiones. La terapia expulsiva con tamsulosina no se asocia a una mayor tasa de expulsión de litiasis ureteral

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin. Methods. Randomized double-blind controlled trial in an emergency department. We enrolled adults with uncomplicated distal ureterolithiasis and no other complaint. Patients were randomized to take either tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d) plus a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or placebo plus the NSAID for 21 days. Results. The stone expulsion rate did not differ statistically between the 2 groups (P=.29). Time until expulsion was also similar (P=.91). Conclusion. Medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin does not improve the rate of distal ureteral stone expulsion

Neumatosis intestinal en la enfermedad de Crohn / Pneumatosis intestinalis in Crohn's disease

No disponible

Limited sensitivity and size over measurements of ultrasound affect medical decisions for ureteral stone compared to non-contrasted computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the limited sensitivity and size over measurements of ultrasound (US) for ureteral stone, and demonstrate how this influenced medical decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed the data of patients with ureterolithiasis estimated by US and non-contrasted computed tomography (NCCT) within 48 h at our institution from January 1st 2014 to June 1st 2017. Stone size was grouped by the longest axis diameter on NCCT: < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm. Then, US and NCCT results were compared for the sensitivity and measurements. RESULTS: A total of 614 cases of ureterolithiasis were visible on NCCT. The sensitivity of US for ureterolithiasis < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm were 63.49, 79.06, and 84.67%, respectively (P = 0.001). US overestimated the size in 63.49 and 50.54% of patients with ureterolithiasis < 5 and 5-10 mm compared to NCCT, respectively (P < 0.001). Under the assumptions that patients with ureteral stone < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm would be simply observed, received medical expulsive therapy (MET), and surgical interventions, 20.94 and 15.33% of patients with stone sized 5-10 and > 10 mm might be improperly observed due to negative US reports. Besides, 63.49 and 50.54% of cases with stone < 5 and 5-10 mm might receive more aggressive interventions ascribed to over measurements of US. CONCLUSIONS: Limited sensitivity and size over measurements of US might significantly influence medical decisions for ureteral stone. Inaccurate evaluation of US should be taken in consideration for appropriate counseling options.

Pielonefritis xantogranulomatosa: caso clínico y revisión bibliográfica / Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Case report and bibliographic review

La pielonefritis xantogranulomatosa consiste en una inflamación crónica del riñón que afecta al tejido sano, siendo reemplazado por macrófagos cargados de lípidos y afectando su funcionalidad. Es una patología muy poco frecuente en niños, por lo que debe tenerse en cuenta como diagnóstico en casos de pielonefritis de repetición que asocian litiasis, y que no responden a tratamiento antibiótico. En pruebas de imagen, se observa la afectación del parénquima renal y debe hacerse diagnóstico diferencial con otras patologías como abscesos o tumores. El tratamiento definitivo es la nefrectomía, que puede ser total o parcial según la afectación del tejido. Presentamos un caso clínico y revisamos la bibliografía de los últimos 5 años, con el objetivo de conocer mejor esta patología y tenerla presente como diagnóstico diferencial de patologías que cursan con clínica similar, para así establecer un diagnóstico temprano y tratamiento oportuno, evitando la extensión de la enfermedad y la aparición de complicaciones (AU)

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis consists of chronic renal inflammation where healthy tissue is replaced by macrophages carrying lipids, and affecting their function. It is a uncommon pathology in children and therefore should be considered a diagnosis in cases of recurrent pyelonephritis associated with lithiasis, and not responding to antibiotic treatment. The affected renal parenchyma is observed on imaging tests, and differential diagnosis must be made with other pathologies such as abscesses and tumors. The definitive treatment is nephrectomy, which may be total or partial depending on tissue involvement. We present a clinical case and review the literature of the last 5 years, with the objective to better understand this pathology, have it presented as a differential diagnosis to pathologies with the same clinical picture, to establish an early diagnosis and timely treatment, and avoiding disease progression and the occurrence of complications (AU)

Inguinal Herniation of Perinephric Tissue: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Inguinal hernias containing a kidney or perinephric tissue are extremely rare and usually related to cases involving a kidney positioned in the pelvis. We report the case of a 79-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain and scrotal swelling. He was found on imaging to have an inferiorly displaced kidney with an inguinal herniation of Gerota fascia, as well as an obstructing ureteral stone with an associated forniceal rupture. The unusual renal anatomy, as well as the management of a forniceal rupture, is discussed.

A Comparison of Urolithiasis in the Presence and Absence of Microscopic Hematuria in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Urolithiasis is a common medical condition that accounts for a large number of emergency department (ED) visits each year and contributes significantly to annual healthcare costs. Urinalysis is an important screening test for patients presenting with symptoms suspicious for urolithiasis. At present there is a paucity of medical literature examining the characteristics of ureteral stones in patients who have microscopic hematuria on urinalysis versus those who do not. The purpose of this study was to examine mean ureteral stone size and its relationship to the incidence of clinically significant hydronephrosis in patients with and without microscopic hematuria. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patient visits to a single, tertiary academic medical center ED between July 1, 2008, and August 1, 2013, of patients who underwent non-contrast computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis and urinalysis. For patient visits meeting inclusion criteria, we compared mean stone size and the rate of moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis found on imaging in patients with and without microscopic hematuria on urinalysis. RESULTS: Out of a total of 2,370 patient visits 393 (16.6%) met inclusion criteria. Of those, 321 (82%) had microscopic hematuria present on urinalysis. Patient visits without microscopic hematuria had a higher rate of moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis (42%), when compared to patients with microscopic hematuria present (25%, p=.005). Mean ureteral stone size among patient visits without microscopic hematuria was 5.7 mm; it was 4.7 mm for those patients with microscopic hematuria (p=.09). For ureteral stones 5 mm or larger, the incidence of moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis was 49%, whereas for ureteral calculi less than 5 mm in size, the incidence of moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis was 14% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients visiting the ED with single-stone ureterolithiasis without microscopic hematuria on urinalysis could be at increased risk of having moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis compared to similar patients presenting with microscopic hematuria on urinalysis. Although the presence of hematuria on urinalysis is a moderately sensitive screening test for urolithiasis, these results suggest patients without hematuria tend to have more clinically significant ureteral calculi, making their detection more important. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for urolithiasis, even in the absence of hematuria, since ureteral stones in these patients were found to be associated with a higher incidence of obstructive uropathy.

Paediatric ureterolithotripsy: Tips and tricks - Experience at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric stone disease is very common in certain regions of India. Traditionally, the endourology for the stones even in paediatric age group is managed by adult urologist and paediatric surgeons tend to do open surgeries. The nonavailability of paediatric size equipments and lack of training at the teaching and tertiary care paediatric surgical centers in India are factors due to which there is continued apathy of paediatric surgeons to endourology. The aim of this study was to discuss the feasibility of paediatric ureterolithotripsy for successful procedure. We introduced the paediatric ureterolithotripsy as per the predecided indications of stone size up to 15 mm in paediatric ureterolithiasis at a tertiary care center in rural set up. SUBJECTS AND METHODS:: Patients up to 18 years of age presenting with ureterolithiasis and not responding to conservative treatment or who needed endourological intervention were included in the study. RESULTS:: Thirty-one patients underwent uretero lithotripsy (URSL) for ureteric calculus with more than 95% clearance rate. CONCLUSIONS:: Single-stage paediatric ureterolithotripsy is quite feasible and effective in achieving the stone clearance in paediatric ureterolithiasis.

Comparison of prone vs. supine unenhanced CT imaging in patients with clinically suspected ureterolithiasis.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate whether prone CT scanning is superior to supine scanning for correct localization of distal urinary calculi in patients with acute flank pain. METHODS: Consecutively performed unenhanced CT scans in patients with acute flank pain were retrospectively analyzed in 150 patients in supine and another 150 patients in prone position. Images were reviewed by two radiologists on consensus. Findings in both groups were compared using two-sided Fisher Exact tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Urinary calculi were found in 67% of patients in each group. In the supine scanning group, there were 16 cases, in which the location of the stone was equivocal being either located intramurally at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) or having already passed into the bladder. In contrast, in the prone imaging group all distal stones could be allocated accurately, either to the intramural UVJ or the urinary bladder (37 intramural UVJ stones and six bladder stones in prone scanning group vs. 21 intramural UVJ stones and one bladder stone when scanned supine). CONCLUSION: Prone scanning is superior to supine CT scanning for acute flank pain to accurately distinguish intramural UVJ stones from stones that have already passed into the bladder, a distinction which influences patient management.

Beyond ureterolithiasis: gamut of abnormalities affecting the ureter.

Nephrolithiasis is the most common condition involving the ureters. However, various other entities can affect the ureters, albeit less frequently. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, management, and follow-up of ureteral pathology. In the past decade, computed tomography urography has replaced traditional methods of ureteral imaging due to its high spatial resolution, multiplanar imaging, and rapid acquisition time. More recently, magnetic resonance urography has also been explored in evaluating ureteral abnormalities. In this review, we briefly discuss current imaging techniques used in assessment of the ureters and present a diverse group of diseases affecting the ureters. We begin with primary and secondary ureteral malignancies, followed by uncommon infectious/inflammatory diseases that can involve the ureters including tuberculosis, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, and graft-versus-host disease. We then discuss the imaging characteristics of endometriosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis as two important examples of pelvic and retroperitoneal processes that occasionally obstruct the ureters and present with clinical symptoms similar to that of renal stones. We end with a brief discussion of miscellaneous conditions that affect the ureters, including ureteral hemorrhage, ureteral intussusception, ureteral pseudodiverticulosis, Malacoplakia, and ureteritis cystica. Knowledge of these entities and their characteristic imaging manifestations along with patient's clinical presentation allows accurate diagnosis and timely patient management.

Normal renal sonogram identifies renal colic patients at low risk for urologic intervention: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Determining which patients with ureterolithiasis are likely to require urologic intervention is a common challenge in the emergency department (ED). The objective was to determine if normal renal sonogram could identify low-risk renal colic patients, who were defined as not requiring urologic intervention within 90 days of their initial ED visit and can be managed conservatively. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving adult patients presenting to the EDs of a tertiary care centre with suspected renal colic over a 20-month period. Renal ultrasonography (US) was performed in the diagnostic imaging department by trained ultrasonographers, and the results were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups: normal, suggestive of ureterolithiasis, visualized ureteric stone, or findings unrelated to urolithiasis. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine if patients received urologic intervention within 90 days of their ED visit. RESULTS: Of 610 patients enrolled, 341 (55.9%) had US for suspected renal colic. Of those, 105 (30.8%) were classified as normal; none of these patients underwent urologic intervention within 90 days of their ED visit. Ninety (26.4%) US results were classified as suggestive, and nine (10%) patients received urologic intervention. A total of 139 (40.8%) US results were classified as visualized ureteric stone, and 34 (24.5%) patients had urologic intervention. Seven (2.1%) US results were classified as findings unrelated to urolithiasis, and none of these patients required urologic intervention. The rate of urologic intervention was significantly lower in those with normal US results (p<0.001) than in those with abnormal findings. CONCLUSION: A normal renal sonogram predicts a low likelihood for urologic intervention within 90 days for adult ED patients with suspected renal colic.

Staphylococcus saprophyticus bacteremia after ESWL in an immunocompetent woman.

Staphylococcus saprophyticus is a well-known cause of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, especially in young and sexually active women. Presence in blood cultures is rare and often attributed to contamination. When bacteremia is significant, it occurs mostly in patients with hematologic malignancies and is predominantly catheter-related. However, we describe a case of significant bacteremia with S. saprophyticus associated with urinary tract infection after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of an ureterolithiasis in an otherwise healthy patient.

Extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy versus retrograde ureteroscopy: is radiation exposure a criterion when we choose which modern treatment to apply for ureteric stones?

The aim of this study is to compare two major urological procedures in terms of patient exposure to radiation. We evaluated 175 patients, that were subjected to retrograde ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy (ESWL) for lumbar or pelvic ureteral lithiasis, at two urological departments. The C-arm Siemens (produced in 2010 by Siemens AG, Germany) was used for ureteroscopy. The radiological devices of the lithotripters used in this study in the two clinical centers had similar characteristics. We evaluated patient exposure to ionizing radiation by using a relevant parameter, the air kerma-area product (PKA; all values in cGy cm(2)), calculated from the radiation dose values recorded by the fluoroscopy device. PKA depends on technical parameters that change due to anatomical characteristics of each case examined, such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and stone location. For the patients subjected to ESWL for lumbar ureteral lithiasis the mean of PKA (cGy cm(2)) was 509 (SD=180), while for those treated for pelvic ureteral lithiasis the mean of PKA was 342 (SD=201). In the URS group for lumbar ureteral lithiasis, the mean of PKA (cGy cm(2)) was 892 (SD=436), while for patients with pelvic ureteral lithiasis, the mean of PKA was 601 (SD=429). The patients treated by URS had higher exposure to ionizing radiation dose than patients treated by ESWL. The risk factors of higher radiation doses were obesity, exposure time, and localization of the stones.

An unusual presentation of bilateral Hutch diverticula.

Summary Hutch diverticula are rare congenital diverticula. The general consensus is that they occur secondary to a congenital failure of normal muscle development around the ureteral orifice where Waldeyer sheath anatomically covers the space between the intravesical ureter and muscular layer of the bladder. Our case highlights the radiological appearance of Hutch diverticula and the need for contrast-enhanced imaging to enable accurate evaluation and diagnosis. It illustrates how the presence of periureteric diverticula can contribute to ureteric obstruction and calculus formation; complicate the interpretation of renal tract imaging and the subsequent management of renal calculi.