RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects about 475,000 children in the United States annually. Studies from the 1990s showed worse mortality in pediatric TBI patients not transferred to a pediatric trauma center (PTC), but did not examine mild pediatric TBI. Evidence-based guidelines used to identify children with clinically insignificant TBI who do not require head CT were developed by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). However, which patients can be safely observed at a non-PTC is not directly addressed. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on management of pediatric TBI and transfer decisions from 1990 to 2020. RESULTS: Pediatric TBI patients make up a great majority of preventable transfers and admissions, and comprise a significant portion of avoidable costs to the health care system. Majority of mild TBI patients admitted to a PTC following transfer do not require ICU care, surgical intervention, or additional imaging. Studies have shown that as high as 83% of mild pediatric TBI patients are discharged within 24 hrs. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based clinical practice algorithm was derived through synthesis of the data reviewed to guide transfer decision. The papers discussed in our systematic review largely concluded that transfer and admission was unnecessary and costly in pediatric patients with mild TBI who met the following criteria: blunt, no concern for NAT, low risk on PECARN assessment, or intermediate risk on PECARN with negative imaging or imaging with either isolated, nondisplaced skull fractures without ICH and/or EDH, or SDH <0.3 cm with no midline shift.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Transferencia de Pacientes , Centros Traumatológicos , Algoritmos , Ambulancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/mortalidad , Conmoción Encefálica/cirugía , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Niño , Cuidados Críticos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicaciones , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Mucormicosis/etiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virología , Huella de Carbono/estadística & datos numéricos , Composición Familiar , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mucormicosis/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaAsunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medicina Estatal , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/economía , Prescripción Inadecuada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Estatal/economía , Medicina Estatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicina Estatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Atención de Bajo Valor , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Urinálisis , Enfermedades Urológicas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/economía , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Urinálisis/economía , Urinálisis/métodos , Urinálisis/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Urológicas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Urológicas/terapia , Enfermedades Urológicas/orinaAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crónica , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos Innecesarios , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Atención al Paciente/economía , Atención al Paciente/métodos , Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Innecesarios/métodos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in awake, clinically stable injured patients is controversial. It is associated with unnecessary radiation exposure and increased cost. We evaluate use of computed tomography (CT) imaging during the initial evaluation of injured patients at American College of Surgeons Levels I and II trauma centers (TCs) after blunt trauma. METHODS: We identified adult blunt trauma patients after motor vehicle crash (MVC) from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2007 and 2016 at Level I or II TCs. We defined awake clinically stable patients as those with systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or higher with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. Computed tomography imaging had to have been performed within 2 hours of arrival. Whole-body computed tomography was defined as simultaneous CT of the head, chest and abdomen, and selective CT if only one to two aforementioned regions were imaged. Patients were stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: There were 217,870 records for analysis; 131,434 (60.3%) had selective CT, and 86,436 (39.7%) had WBCT. Overall, there was an increasing trend in WBCT utilization over the study period (p < 0.001). In patients with ISS less than 10, WBCT was utilized more commonly at Level II versus Level I TCs in patients discharged from the emergency department (26.9% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), which had no surgical procedure(s) (81.4% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.001) and no injury of the head (53.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.008) or abdomen (83.8% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.001). The risk-adjusted odds of WBCT was two times higher at Level II TC vs. Level I (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval 1.82-1.94; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whole-body computed tomography utilization is increasing relative to selective CT. This increasing utilization is highest at Level II TCs in patients with low ISSs, and in patients without associated head or abdominal injury. The findings have implications for quality improvement and cost reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/tendencias , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ahorro de Costo , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/tendencias , Heridas no Penetrantes/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: The Choosing Wisely guidelines indicate that preoperative testing is often unnecessary and wasteful for patients undergoing cataract operations. However, little is known about the impact of these widely disseminated guidelines within the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Objective: To examine the extent, variability, associated factors, and costs of low-value tests (LVTs) prior to cataract operations in the VHA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined records of all patients receiving cataract operations within the VHA in fiscal year 2017 (October 1, 2016, to September 31, 2017). Records from 135 facilities nationwide supporting both ambulatory and inpatient surgery were included. Exposures: A laboratory test occurring within 30 days prior to cataract surgery and within 30 days after clinic evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall national and facility-level rates and associated costs of receiving any of 8 common LVTs in the 30 days prior to cataract surgery. The patient characteristics, procedure type, and facility-level factors associated with receiving at least 1 test, the number of tests received, and receipt of a bundle of 4 tests (complete blood count, basic metabolic profile, chest radiograph, and electrocardiogram). Results: A total of 69â¯070 cataract procedures were identified among 50â¯106 patients (66â¯282 [96.0%] men; mean [SD] age, 71.7 [8.1] years; 53â¯837 [77.9%] White, 10â¯292 [14.9%] Black). Most of the patient population had either overweight (23â¯292 [33.7%] patients) or obesity (27â¯799 [40.2%] patients). Approximately 49% of surgical procedures (33â¯424 procedures) were preceded by 1 or more LVT with an overall LVT cost of $2â¯597â¯623. Among patients receiving LVTs, electrocardiography (7434 patients [29.9%]) was the most common, with some patients also receiving more costly tests, including chest radiographs (489 patients [8.2%]) and pulmonary function tests (127 patients [3.4%]). For receipt of any LVT, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.61 (P < .001) at the facility level and 0.06 (P < .001) at the surgeon level, indicating the substantial contribution of the facility to amount of tests given. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite existing guidelines, use of LVTs prior to cataract surgery is both common and costly within a large, national integrated health care system. Our results suggest that publishing evidence-based guidelines alone-such as the Choosing Wisely campaign-may not sufficiently influence individual physician behavior, and that system-level efforts to directly deimplement LVTs may therefore necessary to effect sustained change.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Atención de Bajo Valor , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economía , Servicios de Salud para Veteranos/economía , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Electrocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Radiografía Torácica/economía , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state. BACKGROUND: Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatment pathways for these patients is a significant opportunity for cost savings. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the treatment and disposition of un-complicated, stable, isolated facial trauma injuries transferred from outside hospitals and determine the significance of secondary overtriage. METHODS: Retrospective chart review utilizing our institutional trauma database, including patients transferred to our emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were identified by ICD9 or ICD10 codes and only those with isolated facial trauma were included. RESULTS: We identified 538 isolated facial trauma patients who were transferred to our institution during the study period. The majority of those patients were transferred via ground ambulance for an average of 76 miles. Overall, 82% of patients (N = 440) were discharged directly from our institution's emergency department. Almost 30% of patients did not require any formal treatment for their injuries; the potential savings associated with elimination of these unnecessary transfers was estimated to be between $388,605 and $771,372. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a high rate of patients with stable, isolated facial trauma that could potentially be evaluated and treated without emergent transfer. The minimization of these unnecessary transfers represents a significant opportunity for cost and resource utilization savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b- Economic and Cost Analysis.
Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo , Vías Clínicas/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Faciales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Faciales/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Triaje/economía , Adulto , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Control de Costos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Honorarios por Prescripción de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Errores Médicos/efectos adversos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Humanos , Errores Médicos/economía , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Aterectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Aterectomía/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Medicare , Michigan , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to implement the Robson Ten Groups Classification System (RTGCS) to identify the main contributors to the caesarean section (CS) rate and to evaluate whether the introduction of a plan of obstetrical interventions reduced this rate. An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted during two time periods at Alicante University General Hospital. In the pre-implementation period (2009-2012), RTGCS was applied to identify the main groups contributing to the overall CS rate. In the post-implementation period (2013-2017), RTGCS was applied again to identify changing trends in CS rates. In all, 11,034 deliveries during the pre-intervention period and 11,453 during the post-intervention period were analysed. The overall CS rate was 23.9% and 20.9%, respectively. There were no changes in perinatal outcomes. In the post-intervention period, there was a significant decrease of the CS rate in the groups of targeted interventions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8B.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? High CS rates are becoming a public health problem because of risks, costs, excessive medicalisation, and abuse of resources. RTGCS provides a framework for auditing and analysing CS rates.What do the results of this study add? RTGCS can identify the groups that have the greatest impact on the CS rate and monitor changes in it consequent to policy changes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice? The introduction of a strategic plan with evidence-based clinical interventions may have a greater effect on the CS rate than other features justifying the increase in the incidence of CS.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/tendencias , Esfuerzo de Parto , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Salud Pública/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , España/epidemiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Public focus on health care spending has increased attention on variation in practice patterns and overutilization of high-cost services. Mainstream news reports have revealed that a small number of providers account for a disproportionate amount of total Medicare payments. Here, we explore variation in Medicare payments among vascular surgeons and compare practice patterns of the most highly reimbursed surgeons to the rest of the workforce. METHODS: 2016 Medicare Provider Utilization Data were queried to identify procedure, charge, and payment data to vascular surgeons, identified by National Provider Identification taxonomy. Commonly performed services (>10/year) were stratified into categories (endovascular, open surgery, varicose vein, evaluation and management, etc.). Practice patterns of vascular surgeons comprising the top 1% Medicare payments (n = 31) were compared with the remainder of the workforce (n = 3,104). RESULTS: In 2016, Medicare payments to vascular surgeons totaled $589 M. 31 vascular surgeons-1% of the workforce-received $91 million (15% of total payments). Practice patterns of the 1% differed significantly from the remainder of vascular surgeons (P < 0.05), with endovascular procedures accounting for 85% of their reimbursement. Specifically, the 1% received 49% of total Medicare payments for atherectomy ($121 M), 98% of which were performed in the office setting. CONCLUSIONS: One percentage of vascular surgeons receive an inordinate amount of total Medicare payments to the specialty. This discrepancy is due to variations in volume, utilization, and site of service. Disproportionate use of outpatient atherectomy in a small number of providers, for example, raises concerns regarding appropriateness and overutilization. Given current scrutiny over health care spending, these findings should prompt serious discussion regarding the utility of personal and societal self-regulation.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía/tendencias , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/tendencias , Medicare/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Cirujanos/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Aterectomía/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Medicare/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Cirujanos/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economíaRESUMEN
The Society for Vascular Surgery Alternative Payment Model (APM) Taskforce document explores the drivers and implications for developing objective value-based reimbursement plans for the care of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The APM is a payment approach that highlights high-quality and cost-efficient care and is a financially incentivized pathway for participation in the Quality Payment Program, which aims to replace the traditional fee-for-service payment method. At present, the participation of vascular specialists in APMs is hampered owing to the absence of dedicated models. The increasing prevalence of PAD diagnosis, technological advances in therapeutic devices, and the increasing cost of care of the affected patients have financial consequences on care delivery models and population health. The document summarizes the existing measurement methods of cost, care processes, and outcomes using payor data, patient-reported outcomes, and registry participation. The document also evaluates the existing challenges in the evaluation of PAD care, including intervention overuse, treatment disparities, varied clinical presentations, and the effects of multiple comorbid conditions on the cost potentially attributable to the vascular interventionalist. Medicare reimbursement data analysis also confirmed the prolonged need for additional healthcare services after vascular interventions. The Society for Vascular Surgery proposes that a PAD APM should provide patients with comprehensive care using a longitudinal approach with integration of multiple key medical and surgical services. It should maintain appropriate access to diagnostic and therapeutic advancements and eliminate unnecessary interventions. It should also decrease the variability in care but must also consider the varying complexity of the presenting PAD conditions. Enhanced quality of care and physician innovation should be rewarded. In addition, provisions should be present within an APM for high-risk patients who carry the risk of exclusion from care because of the naturally associated high costs. Although the document demonstrates clear opportunities for quality improvement and cost savings in PAD care, continued PAD APM development requires the assessment of more granular data for accurate risk adjustment, in addition to largescale testing before public release. Collaboration between payors and physician specialty societies remains key.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/economía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Comités Consultivos , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extended care facility use is a primary driver of variation in hospitalization-associated health care payments and is increasingly a focus for savings under episode-based payment. However, concerns remain that extended care facility limits could incur rising readmissions, emergency department use, or other costs. We analyzed the effects of a statewide value improvement initiative to decrease extended care facility use after lower extremity arthroplasty on extended care facility use, readmission, emergency department use, and payments. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using complete claims from the Michigan Value Collaborative for patients undergoing lower extremity joint replacement. We compared the change in extended care facility use before (2012-2013) and after (2016-2017) the aforementioned statewide initiative with 90-day postacute care, readmission, and emergency department rates and payments using t tests. RESULTS: Of the patients included, 68,537 underwent total knee arthroplasty; 27,131 underwent total hip arthroplasty. Statewide, extended care facility use and postacute care payments decreased (extended care facility: 27.5% before vs 18.1% after, payments: $4,999 vs $3,832, P < .0001) without increased readmission rates (8.0% vs 7.6%, P = .10) or payments ($1,087 vs $1,026, P = .14). Emergency department use increased (7.8% vs 8.9%, P < .0001). Per hospital, there was no association between extended care facility use change and readmission rate change (r = 0.05). Hospital change in extended care facility use ranged from +2.3% (no extended care facility decrease group) to -16.6% (large extended care facility decrease group) and was associated with lower total episode payments without differences in change in readmission rate/payments or emergency department use. CONCLUSION: Despite decreased use of extended care facilities, there was no compensatory increase in readmission rate or payments. Reducing excess use of extended care facilities after joint replacement may be an important opportunity for savings in episode-based reimbursement.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/rehabilitación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Ahorro de Costo/normas , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/normas , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Michigan , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/economía , Atención Subaguda/economía , Atención Subaguda/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening with ultrasound (US) and potential cost savings by adhering to guidelines and reviewing prior imaging. METHODS: Screening aortic US performed in Nova Scotia from January 1 to April 30, 2019, were reviewed. Patient sex, age, risk factors, and study result (negative, <2.5 cm; ectatic, 2.5-2.9 cm; positive for AAA, ≥3 cm) were recorded. Previous imaging tests were reviewed for the presence/absence of aortic ectasia or aneurysm. Appropriateness was based on the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) and the Canadian Society of Vascular Surgery (CSVS) guidelines. The number of potentially averted US, subsequent missed positive findings, and cost savings (over the 4-month period) were calculated according to: 1) each guideline; and 2) each guideline combined with review of imaging done 0 to 5 years and 0 to 10 years previously. RESULTS: There were 17 (4.6%) of 369 ectatic aortas and 18 (4.9%) of 369 AAAs. The number of potentially averted examinations, missed ectatic aortas, missed AAAs, and cost savings were as follows, respectively: CTFPHC, 222 (60.2%) of 369, 8, 7, and CAD$20 501.70; CSVS, 117 (31.7%) of 369, 4, 2, and CAD$10 804.95. The model that would yield the greatest cost savings and fewest missed positive findings was the combination of CSVS guidelines with review of prior imaging within 5 years; this would avert 189 (51.2%) of 369 examinations, save CAD$17 454.15 over 4 months, and miss only 2 AAAs and 2 ectatic aortas. CONCLUSION: Over half of aortic US screening tests can be safely averted by adhering to CSVS guidelines and reviewing imaging performed within 5 years.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Abdominal/patología , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Erróneo/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Económicos , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Importance: For healthy adults, routine testing during annual check-ups is considered low value and may trigger cascades of medical services of unclear benefit. It is unknown how often routine tests are performed during Medicare annual wellness visits (AWVs) or whether they are associated with cascades of care. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of routine electrocardiograms (ECGs), urinalyses, and thyrotropin tests and of cascades (further tests, procedures, visits, hospitalizations, and new diagnoses) that might follow among healthy adults receiving AWVs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare claims data from beneficiaries aged 66 years and older who were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2015; received an AWV in 2014; had no test-relevant prior conditions; did not receive 1 of the 3 tests in the 6 months before the AWV; and had no test-relevant symptoms or conditions in the AWV testing period. Data were analyzed from February 13, 2019, to June 8, 2020. Exposure: Receipt of a given test within 1 week before or after the AWV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of routine tests during AWVs and cascade-attributable event rates and associated spending in the 90 days following the AWV test period. Patient, clinician, and area-level characteristics associated with receiving routine tests were also assessed. Results: Among 75â¯275 AWV recipients (mean [SD] age, 72.6 [6.1] years; 48â¯107 [63.9%] women), 18.6% (14â¯017) received at least 1 low-value test including an ECG (7.2% [5421]), urinalysis (10.0% [7515]), or thyrotropin test (8.7% [6534]). Patients were more likely to receive a low-value test if they were younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.69 for ages 66-74 years vs ages ≥85 years [95% CI, 1.53-1.86]), White (aOR, 1.32 compared with Black [95% CI, 1.16-1.49]), lived in urban areas (aOR, 1.29 vs rural [95% CI, 1.15-1.46]), and lived in high-income areas (aOR, 1.26 for >400% of the federal poverty level vs <200% of the federal poverty level [95% CI, 1.16-1.37]). A total of 6.1 (95% CI, 4.8-7.5) cascade-attributable events per 100 beneficiaries occurred in the 90 days following routine ECGs and 5.4 (95% CI, 4.2-6.5) following urinalyses, with cascade-attributable cost per beneficiary of $9.62 (95% CI, $6.43-$12.80) and $7.46 (95% CI, $5.11-$9.81), respectively. No cascade-attributable events or costs were found to be associated with thyrotropin tests. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, 19% of healthy Medicare beneficiaries received routine low-value ECGs, urinalyses, or thyrotropin tests during their AWVs, more often those who were younger, White, and lived in urban, high-income areas. ECGs and urinalyses were associated with cascades of modest but notable cost.