Evolving Disparities in Cannabis Use Among Youth by Demographics and Tobacco and Alcohol Use in the U.S.: 2013-2021.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the prevalence of past 30-day cannabis use among U.S. youth by cigarette use, alcohol use, demographics, and state-of-residence cannabis legal status in 2021 and examined whether changes in cannabis use prevalence were modified by these factors from 2013 to 2021. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 24 states that collected cannabis use data participating in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System from 2013 to 2021. Logistic regression analyses estimated past 30-day cannabis prevalence in 2021 and produced AORs by current cigarette, alcohol, and state-of-residence cannabis legal status. The same method was used with year as the exposure, adjusting for sex, race, and ethnicity, to assess trends in prevalence from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS: In 2021, cannabis use was more common among female youth (16.75% vs 13.83% [AOR=1.26, 95% CI=1.16, 1.37]) and non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic youth than among non-Hispanic White youth (17.19%, 16.14% vs 14.60% [AOR=1.25, 95% CI=1.12, 1.39 and AOR=1.16, 95% CI=1.04, 1.29, respectively]). Cannabis use was much more common among youth who reported any past 30-day cigarette or alcohol use (44.90% vs 6.48% [AOR=11.80, 95% CI=10.57, 13.18]). Declines in cannabis use were observed independent of state-level cannabis law from 2013 to 2021, and cannabis use prevalence did not differ significantly by state-of-residence cannabis legal status among the 24 participating states in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Public health officials should carefully consider the potential impact of expanding commercialization of cannabis as a wellness product on youth cannabis use, especially with regard to minoritized populations and co-use with tobacco and alcohol. National and state-level public health education on cannabis use and youth-oriented prevention of cannabis uptake are long overdue.

Impacto de la legalización del consumo recreativo del cannabis / Impact of the legalisation of recreational cannabis use

En los últimos años se han producido importantes cambios legislativos en numerosos países respecto al consumo de cannabis con fines medicinales y/o recreativos, que han facilitado su accesibilidad. Actualmente, Uruguay, Canadá y algunos estados de EE.UU. han legalizado el consumo recreativo, aplicando distintos modelos legislativos. El objetivo de la presente revisión es analizar los efectos que ha tenido la legalización del cannabis recreativo sobre su consumo y sus consecuencias. En general, las evidencias indican que la legalización se ha asociado a un descenso en el precio, mayor concentración de THC (potencia), mayor diversidad de presentaciones para su consumo, una menor percepción de riesgo y un incremento en el consumo en adultos y de forma moderada en adolescentes (aunque sea ilegal el consumo para ellos), así como un aumento de las consecuencias adversas derivadas del consumo en la salud pública. Se ha producido un descenso en los arrestos relacionados con el consumo, pero el mercado ilegal sigue utilizándose de forma habitual. No se ha detectado un incremento de la demanda de tratamiento por este consumo. Por el momento, estos cambios legislativos no han conseguido alcanzar sus objetivos principales que eran suprimir el mercado ilegal y proteger a los grupos más vulnerables, mientras que, por el contrario, parecen implicar un incremento de algunos aspectos negativos asociados al consumo de cannabis. Sin embargo, teniendo en cuenta que la mayoría de estos cambios legislativos han entrado en vigor hace relativamente poco tiempo, se requiere un periodo de seguimiento mayor para poder extraer conclusiones definitivas. (AU)

In recent years, there have been important legislative changes in many countries regarding the use of cannabis for medicinal and/or recreational purposes, which have facilitated access to it. Uruguay, Canada and some of the US states are the only jurisdictions that have legalised recreational consumption, applying different legislative models. The aim of this review is to analyse the effects that the legalisation of recreational cannabis has had on its use and its consequences. In general, the evidence accumulated to date indicates that the legalisation of cannabis has been associated with a decrease in the price of the substance, higher concentration of THC (potency), greater diversity of presentations for consumption, lower risk perception and an increase in consumption in adults and moderately in adolescents (even though it is illegal for them to consume), as well as an increase in the adverse consequences derived from cannabis consumption on public health. There has been a decrease in drug-related arrests, but the illegal market continues to be frequently used. No increase in the demand for treatment due to cannabis consumption has been detected. Therefore, these legislative changes have so far failed to achieve their main objectives, which were to suppress the illegal market and protect the most vulnerable groups, while on the contrary, they seem to imply an increase in some of the negative aspects associated with cannabis consumption. However, taking into account that most of these legislative changes have entered into force relatively recently, a longer follow-up period is required to be able to draw definitive conclusions. (AU)

¿Es posible crear la adecuada sensación de riesgo entre los consumidores de cannabis medicinal? / Can we increase risk perception among medical cannabis users?

Es cada vez mayor el número de investigaciones relacionadas con las posibles aplicaciones terapéuticas de los cannabinoides. Aunque en algunas enfermedades los resultados obtenidos son esperanzadores, la investigación en desarrollo está en sus etapas iniciales. Para algunos síntomas se ha probado la efectividad medicinal de los cannabinoides. Pero, en muchos casos no se dispone todavía de la adecuada evidencia al respecto, ni son suficientes los datos existentes sobre los riesgos asociados al consumo de cannabis medicinal. (AU)

Marijuana use does not affect the outcomes of bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The decriminalization of marijuana and legalization of derived products requires investigation of their effect on healthcare-related outcomes. Unfortunately, little data are available on the impact of marijuana use on surgical outcomes. We aimed to determine the effect of marijuana use on 30-day complications and 1-year weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: At a large academic center, 1176 consecutive patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery from 2012 to 2017 were identified and separated into cohorts according to marijuana use. The only exclusions were 19 patients lost to follow-up. Propensity score matching, using logistic regression according to preoperative age, gender, BMI, and comorbid conditions, yielded 73 patient pairs for the control and study arms. All patients were followed two years postoperatively. RESULTS: Excess BMI lost did not differ between marijuana users and controls at 3 weeks (23.0% vs 18.9%, p = 0.095), 3 months (42.0% vs 38.1%, p = 0.416), 6 months (60.6% vs 63.1%, p = 0.631), 1 year (78.2% vs 77.3%, p = 0.789), or 2 years (89.1% vs 74.5%, p = 0.604). No differences in the rate of major 30-day postoperative complications, including readmission, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding events and reoperation rates, were found between groups. Follow-up rate at two years was lower in marijuana users (12.3% vs 27.4%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: This study suggests marijuana use has no impact on 30-day complications or weight loss following bariatric surgery, and should not be a contraindication to bariatric surgery.

Characterizing substance use in a sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults in Mexico.

Background: Research from high-income countries on substance use among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults is growing; however, limited empirical research exists on LGBT adults in Mexico. Filling this gap is critical as LGBT adults experience unique stressors that may place them at risk for substance use-related health outcomes. Objectives: This study sought to characterize substance use prevalence and magnitude among a convenience sample of Mexican LGBT adults. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using a sample of Spanish-speaking, self-identified LGBT adults (n = 92) residing in Mexico who were recruited through online forums of LGBT-focused organizations. Descriptive and frequency analyses were conducted. Results: Participants predominantly identified as cisgender men (n = 44) and gay/lesbian (n = 68). Participants reported high rates of past 90-day legal substance use (>93% for alcohol and >57% for tobacco). The most commonly reported illicit drug used in the past 90 days was marijuana (>29%). Conclusions: While the sample reported lower prevalence and magnitude of substance use relative to other Mexican or United States LGBT samples, the findings highlight that legal and illicit substance use presents health risks for Mexican LGBT individuals. LGBT identity-affirming substance use treatment may reduce substance use-related health burden among this population.

Adolescent Marijuana Use in the United States and Structural Breaks: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis, 1991-2018.

To investigate temporal patterns, sociodemographic gradients, and structural breaks in adolescent marijuana use in the United States from 1991 to 2018, we used hierarchical age-period-cohort logistic regression models to distinguish temporal effects of marijuana use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders from 28 waves of the Monitoring the Future survey (1991-2018). Structural breaks in period effects were further detected via a dynamic-programing-based method. Net of other effects, we found a clear age-related increase in the probability of marijuana use (10.46%, 23.17%, and 31.19% for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders, respectively). Period effects showed a substantial increase over time (from 16.23% in 2006 to 26.38% in 2018), while cohort effects remained stable throughout the study period. Risk of adolescent marijuana use varied by sex, racial group, family status, and parental education. Significant structural breaks during 1995-1996, 2006-2008, and 2011-2013 were identified in different subpopulations. A steady increase in marijuana use among adolescents during the latter years of this time period was identified. Adolescents who were male, were non-Black, lived in nonintact families, and had less educated parents were especially at risk of marijuana usage. Trends in adolescent marijuana use changed significantly during times of economic crisis.

Inteligencia emocional rasgo y habilidad como factores asociados al consumo de cannabis en la adolescencia / Trait and ability emotional intelligence as factors associated with cannabis use in adolescence

Diversos organismos internacionales alertan sobre el incremento deconsumo de cannabis y de su uso extendido entre los adolescentes.El presente estudio ha sido uno de los primeros con el objetivo deanalizar el papel de la inteligencia emocional rasgo y habilidad, basada en el modelo de Mayer y Salovey, en relación al consumo decannabis en adolescentes. En este estudio participaron 799 jóvenesespañoles con edades comprendidas entre los 12 y los 16 años. Seadministró un autoinforme de inteligencia emocional (IE) rasgo, untest de rendimiento máximo de IE y se preguntó sobre los hábitosrelacionados con el consumo de cannabis. Este estudio de tipo transversal se llevó a cabo a través de una metodología de corte cuantitativoy de tipo correlacional. Los principales resultados obtenidos mediantelos análisis de regresión una vez controlados el género, la edad y elcontexto de centro, revelaron asociaciones negativas entre los factoresde comprensión y reparación emocional de la IE rasgo y las variablesde consumo de cannabis, al contrario que la atención emocional. Porotro lado, en relación con la IE habilidad, los factores de percepción yfacilitación se asociaron de manera inversa al consumo de cannabis enlos adolescentes. Los resultados de este estudio sugieren que tanto laIE rasgo como la IE habilidad son constructos complementarios queayudan a explicar el consumo de cannabis. Estos hallazgos proporcionan evidencias empíricas que podrían orientar intervenciones clínicas y educativas enfocadas a la prevención del consumo en esta etapa. (AU)

Many international organisms have warned of the increased consumption of cannabis and its extensive use by adolescents. Thisstudy is one of the first with the aim of analyzing the role of abilityand trait emotional intelligence, based on the model of Mayer andSalovey, with regards to the consumption of cannabis by adolescents.The study participants were 799 Spanish nationals aged 12 to 16.They were administered a self-report on trait emotional intelligence(EI), a test of maximum EI performance and were asked about theirhabits relating to cannabis consumption. This cross-sectional studyused a quantitative, correlational methodology. The main resultsobtained from the regression analysis once gender, age and context ofresidence were controlled for, revealed negative associations betweenthe factors of understanding and emotional repair of trait EI and thecannabis consumption variables, in contrast to emotional attention.On the other hand, with regards to ability EI, the factors of perceptionand facilitation were inversely associated with cannabis consumptionin adolescents. The results suggest that both trait and ability EI arecomplementary constructs that help to explain cannabis consumptionduring this life stage. These findings offer empirical evidence thatmay help guide clinical and educational interventions focused onprevention of consumption during this period. (AU)

Reduction and Cessation of Alcohol, Cannabis, and Stimulant Use: Prospective Associations With Changes in Depressive Symptoms Across Two Cohort Studies of Sexual and Gender Minorities.

OBJECTIVE: Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) are at increased risk for substance use and depression. However, little research has examined the directionality of associations between substance use and depression in this high-risk population, and we are not aware of any to parse associations between depression and changes in the frequency of substance use versus substance use cessation. Such research can help to inform the development of future interventions to address health disparities affecting SGM. METHOD: We used data from two longitudinal cohorts of SGM assigned male at birth (SGM-AMAB; N = 1,418) to examine associations between changes in frequency of alcohol, cannabis, and stimulant use and depressive symptoms. Multilevel models tested whether changes in substance use predicted changes in depressive symptoms and vice versa. RESULTS: Results indicate that when SGM-AMAB decreased their alcohol use or ceased alcohol, cannabis, or stimulant use, they experienced concurrent decreases in depressive symptoms. Only reducing stimulant use (not alcohol or cannabis use) was associated with decreases in depressive symptoms over the subsequent 6 months. Depressive symptoms did not prospectively predict cessation or reduction in the use of any substance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that clinical interventions targeting substance use may simultaneously reduce depressive symptoms and that reductions in alcohol use (even in the absence of cessation) may simultaneously benefit mental health among SGM-AMAB. The limited evidence of prospective effects over 6 months suggests that studies with shorter lags may be better equipped to examine the directionality of the association between depressive symptoms and substance use/reduction.

Testing the drug use and condomless anal sex link among sexual minority men: The predictive utility of marijuana and interactions with relationship status.

BACKGROUND: The association between drug use and condomless anal sex (CAS) is well documented among sexual minority men (SMM). Less is known about whether this association generalizes to marijuana and across relationship status and sexual agreements groups (single, partnered monogamous, partnered open -outside partners permitted, and partnered monogamish -outside partners permitted when main partners are together). METHODS: A nationwide sample of SMM (N = 65,707) were recruited through a geosocial networking app between November 2017 and November 2019. Participants reported on drug use and instances of CAS with casual partners in the previous 30 days. RESULTS: Both marijuana and club drug use were associated with the occurrence of CAS with casual partners among single men. Only club drug use was associated with CAS frequency in this group. The association between marijuana and the occurrence of CAS did not differ significantly among monogamous men, while the associations between club drug use and the occurrence as well as frequency of CAS were significantly weaker. Meanwhile, the associations between club drug use and the occurrence as well as frequency of CAS did not differ significantly between single and non-monogamous (open and monogamish) subgroups; however, the association between marijuana and the occurrence of CAS was significantly weaker. CONCLUSIONS: Findings largely replicated the robust association between club drug use and CAS with casual partners. They support the assertion that marijuana use predicts sexual risk for some SMM subgroups. Finally, they illustrate the potential for relationship status - and sexual agreements - to contextualize associations between drug use and CAS.

Racial and gender inequities in the implementation of a cannabis criminal justice diversion program in a large and diverse metropolitan county of the USA.

BACKGROUND: Diversion programs are considered alternatives to the arrest and incarceration of non-violent drug offenders, including those found in possession of smaller amounts of cannabis in states with prohibitive laws. Despite the progressive nature of such programs, the inability to complete diversion program requirements can often result in greater involvement with the criminal justice system than traditional case adjudication. Few studies have evaluated racial group differences in cannabis diversion program completion. METHODS: The current study examined a sample of 8323 adult participants in Harris County, Texas' Marijuana Misdemeanor Diversion Program (MMDP) between March 2017 and July 2019. Gender, age, and race/ethnicity were examined as predictors of program completion and time to completion using Chi square, Kruskal Wallis tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Both males and African Americans were over-represented (80 % and 50 %, respectively) among participants of Harris County's MMDP. African American (HR = 0.782, 95 % CI [.735-.832], p < .001) and Latino American MMDP participants (HR = .822, 95 % CI [.720-.937], p = .003) had significantly lower odds of MMDP completion and a longer interval to program completion as compared to non-Latino White participants. CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified racial/ethnic and gender disparities in a large county's cannabis diversion program. These findings may be related to law enforcement disparities which disproportionately target males and people of color. Findings may serve to inform the continued reform of the criminal justice system, particularly laws relating to cannabis.

Assessing how the history of e-cigarette and cigarette use are associated with the developmental course of marijuana use in a sample of United States adolescents.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the developmental course of marijuana use among adolescents based on their history of cigarette and e-cigarette use among a national U.S. sample of adolescents who were followed over a four year time-period. METHODS: The data for this study used four waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provided by a panel of 12 to 17-year-olds at Wave 1 (n = 11,059) who completed each of the four annual waves of the adolescent/adult survey. We examined recent use (i.e., past 30-day) of e-cigarettes, cigarettes, and marijuana use at each of the four waves. RESULTS: Respondents who had a history of non-concurrent dual use (AOR = 1.67, 95 % CI = 1.24, 2.24) and a history of concurrent dual use (AOR = 1.67, 95 % CI = 1.40, 1.99) had greater odds of past 30-day marijuana use when compared to respondents who had a history of past 30-day e-cigarette use only. Interaction effect models found that e-cigarette only users were at lower risk for past 30-day marijuana use at Wave 1, however, the risk of past 30-day marijuana use increased at a faster rate across the four waves for e-cigarette only users when compared to their peers who used cigarettes or a combination of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. CONCLUSION: While concurrent and non-concurrent dual use was strongly associated with marijuana use over the study period, marijuana use increased at a faster rate across the four-year span of the study among e-cigarette only users.

Gray matter changes in chronic heavy cannabis users: a voxel-level study using multivariate pattern analysis approach.

Recent structural MRI studies on gray matter (GM) volumes using group-level mass-univariate statistical analysis suggest that chronic and heavy cannabis exposure may affect brain region-based morphology. In this prospective study, we use a multivariate pattern analysis approach to investigate the voxel-level change of GM densities in chronic heavy cannabis users. Principal component analysis and linear support vector machine are used in this study, resulting in an 88.1% separation between chronic heavy cannabis users (N = 20) and non-cannabis healthy controls (HCs, N = 22) through leave-one-out cross-validation. The model's discriminative pattern showed that GM density decreases in the part of middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus and left occipital lobe in heavy cannabis users with respect to HCs and increases in the part of lentiform nucleus, left cerebellum and right parietal lobe. These results suggest that GM densities alteration has taken place on chronic heavy cannabis users compared with HCs at voxel level.

Perceptions of U.S. and Canadian Cannabis Package Warnings Among U.S. Adults.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis warning labels can communicate risks, but there is little research on warning perceptions and differences by product type. METHODS: In a 2019 online survey, 1,000 U.S. adults (500 cannabis users and 500 cannabis non-users who used tobacco) were randomly assigned to view no warning or one of four U.S. or Canadian warnings displayed on images of packaging for dried flower or edible cannabis. The warnings described cannabis risks related to psychosis, addiction, lack of FDA oversight, and impaired driving. We used linear regression to examine perceptions of warnings and product harm as a function of product type (dried or edible) and warning. We examined which warning participants selected as most effective for discouraging youth use and impaired driving. RESULTS: Participants found the addiction warning (cannabis users: B = -1.04, p < 0.001; cannabis non-users: B = 1.17, p < 0.001) and psychosis warning (users: B = -0.65, p < 0.05; non-users: B = -0.71, p < 0.05) less believable than the driving warning but indicated that they learned more from the psychosis warning than the driving warning (users: B = 0.88, p < 0.01; non-users (B = 1.60, p < 0.001). Participants viewing any warning considered smoking cannabis to be more harmful than those viewing no warning (all p < 0.05). The psychosis warning was most frequently selected as the best warning for discouraging youth use. CONCLUSIONS: Warnings have the potential to educate consumers and impact cannabis harm perceptions. Warnings have similar effects across product types, potentially eliminating the need for product type-specific warnings. The association of cannabis use with risk for psychosis, a topic addressed in Canadian warnings, could be a useful topic of focus in U.S. warnings.

Longitudinal associations between amygdala reactivity and cannabis use in a large sample of adolescents.

RATIONALE: The amygdala is a key brain structure to study in relation to cannabis use as reflected by its high-density of cannabinoid receptors and functional reactivity to processes relevant to drug use. Previously, we identified a correlation between cannabis use in early adolescence and amygdala hyper-reactivity to angry faces (Spechler et al. 2015). OBJECTIVES: Here, we leveraged the longitudinal aspect of the same dataset (the IMAGEN study) to determine (1) if amygdala hyper-reactivity predicts future cannabis use and (2) if amygdala reactivity is affected by prolonged cannabis exposure during adolescence. METHODS: First, linear regressions predicted the level of cannabis use by age 19 using amygdala reactivity to angry faces measured at age 14 prior to cannabis exposure in a sample of 1119 participants. Next, we evaluated the time course of amygdala functional development from age 14 to 19 for angry face processing and how it might be associated with protracted cannabis use throughout this developmental window. We compared the sample from Spechler et al. 2015, the majority of whom escalated their use over the 5-year interval, to a matched sample of non-users. RESULTS: Right amygdala reactivity to angry faces significantly predicted cannabis use 5 years later in a dose-response fashion. Cannabis-naïve adolescents demonstrated the lowest levels of amygdala reactivity. No such predictive relationship was identified for alcohol or cigarette use. Next, follow-up analyses indicated a significant group-by-time interaction for the right amygdala. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Right amygdala hyper-reactivity is predictive of future cannabis use, and (2) protracted cannabis exposure during adolescence may alter the rate of neurotypical functional development.

Cannabis knowledge and implications for health: Considerations regarding the legalization of non-medical cannabis.

Cannabis contains over a hundred of different cannabinoids, of which Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are the most well studied. The use of high-potency cannabis, containing high concentrations of THC and low concentrations of CBD, has been linked to adverse health outcomes, particularly for adolescents and young adults. Recently, an increase in cannabis potency has been observed in jurisdictions that legalized the sale of cannabis for non-medical purposes. Moreover, an increase of cannabis use and cannabis-related emergency treatment have also been observed in these jurisdictions. At the same time, risk perception regarding cannabis use has decreased in these populations. Trivializing language and an increased appearance of commercial cannabis in the public space may lead to a generalized underestimation of the risks of cannabis use. New regulation models principally focus on the creation of a legal cannabis market economy, the diversion of profits from illegal markets, and the reduction of costs associated with prohibition. However, an approach that specifically focuses on the rights to the health and safety of the individual should be considered in order to reduce the risks associated with cannabis legalization. Such an approach should promote and protect individual and social health and safety, establish a strict quality control of legal cannabis products regulated according to THC and CBD content, and eliminate all sorts of incentives to use, thus providing a more consistent, sustainable, and ethical framework for the legalization of non-medical cannabis use.

Incidental finding of age and time disorientation in a clinical sample of patients with schizophrenia: Findings from a short term follow up survey regarding cannabis use.

Age disorientation has been described in a subtype of patients with schizophrenia. The current article reports on an incidental finding from our survey study on patterns of cannabis use pre-post legalization in patients with schizophrenia. For the purpose of the survey study, patients were asked to fill out a total of 41 survey questions. The same participants were contacted over the phone 8 weeks post-legalization. Responses to the survey questions were consistent pre- and post-legalization except for four items which required estimation of time/age. This incidental finding highlights the need for further exploration of this phenomenon by future studies.