Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.042
Filtrar
3.
Vaccine ; 42(13): 3153-3156, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627149

RESUMEN

In October 2023, the Tel Aviv District was notified of ten cases of measles. The outbreak initiated in a preschool with high vaccination coverage with one dose of MMR vaccine. Serological testing was available for eight patients (six children and two adults). Among the six children vaccinated with one dose of MMR vaccine, primary vaccine failure was demonstrated. Among the adults, secondary vaccine failure was confirmed. The outbreak was successfully contained due to a combination of factors, notably its occurrence within a population characterized by high vaccination coverage in Tel Aviv, during a period of restricted public interactions due to the prevailing state of war in the country. Despite challenging wartime conditions, effective prophylactic measures were promptly executed, encompassing a 2-dose MMR vaccination schedule for close contacts and the broader community of children in the TA district, successfully curbing the outbreak and preventing widespread infections.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Sarampión , Cobertura de Vacunación , Vacunación , Humanos , Sarampión/prevención & control , Sarampión/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Israel/epidemiología , Preescolar , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Lactante , Esquemas de Inmunización , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(6): 587-595, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Global pediatric immunization programs with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have reduced vaccine-type pneumococcal disease, but a substantial disease burden of non-PCV serotypes remains. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of 20-valent PCV (PCV20) relative to 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in healthy infants. Participants received 2 infant doses and a toddler dose of PCV20 or PCV13, with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis combination vaccine at all doses and measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines at the toddler dose. Primary pneumococcal immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (NI) of PCV20 to PCV13 for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations after infant and toddler doses and percentages of participants with predefined serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations after infant doses. Safety endpoints included local reactions, systemic events and adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 1204 participants were vaccinated (PCV20, n = 601; PCV13, n = 603). One month after the toddler dose, 19/20 serotypes met NI for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations; serotype 6B narrowly missed NI [PCV20/PCV13 geometric mean ratio: 0.57 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.67); NI criterion: lower 2-sided 95% confidence interval >0.5]. Sixteen/twenty serotypes met NI for ≥1 primary objective after 2 infant doses. PCV20 induced robust opsonophagocytic activity, and boosting responses were observed for all vaccine serotypes, including those missing statistical NI. The safety/tolerability profile of PCV20 was like that of PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: PCV20 3-dose series in infants was safe and elicited robust immune responses. Based on these results and PCV13 experience, PCV20 3-dose series is expected to be protective for all 20 vaccine serotypes. NCT04546425.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/efectos adversos , Lactante , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/efectos adversos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Esquemas de Inmunización , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Preescolar , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Vacunas Combinadas
5.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(3): 96, 2024 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430244

RESUMEN

Given the higher susceptibility to infectious disease in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies for inflammatory dermatologic conditions, immunization is important in this population. While live vaccines protect against life-threatening diseases, they can be harmful in immunosuppressed patients given the risk of replication of the attenuated pathogen and adverse reactions. The utilization of live vaccines in immunosuppressed patients depends on multiple factors such as the vaccine and therapy regimen. To provide an overview of evidence-based recommendations for the use of live vaccines in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies for dermatological conditions. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed using keywords live vaccine, live-attenuated vaccine, dermatology, immunosuppressed, and immunocompromised, and specific immunosuppressive therapies: corticosteroids, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, biologics. Relevant articles written in English were included. Using these keywords, 125 articles were reviewed, of which 28 were ultimately selected. Recommendations for live vaccines can be determined on a case-by-case basis. Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (MMRV) vaccines may be safely administered to patients on low-dose immunosuppressive agents while the yellow fever vaccine is typically contraindicated. It may be safe to administer live MMRV boosters to children on immunosuppressive therapies and the live herpes zoster vaccine to patients on biologics. Given poor adherence to immunization guidelines in immunosuppressed patients, dermatologists have a critical role in educating patients and general practitioners regarding live vaccines. By reviewing a patient's vaccination history and following immunization guidelines prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapies, physicians can mitigate morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/efectos adversos
6.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 1): 275-280, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385412

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Solid-organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of severe infections due to their immunosuppressed state. Despite the recommendation of routine screening and vaccination before transplant to mitigate this danger, vaccination rates in these patients are still below desirable levels. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of positive antibody rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella among children who are candidates for renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and included 144 pediatric kidney transplant patients for the past 7 years. We reviewed the medical records of all participants to evaluate their serologic status for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella viruses before kidney transplant. RESULTS: In this study, 144 pediatric kidney transplant candidates (mean age 11.5 years, 56.9% male) were enrolled, and the most frequent causes of the chronic renal disease were congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and glomerular diseases (32.6%). Seropositivity rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella were 59.0%, 31.9%, 46.5%, and 43.6%, respectively, and all patients who tested negative for antibodies were vaccinated before transplant. Younger age at transplant (OR = 0.909, 95% CI = 0.840-0.923; P = .017) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.1548-7.735; P = .002) were significantly associated with increased measles seropositivity, although no significant associations were observed for the other viruses. CONCLUSIONS: We observed lower seropositivity rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in pediatric kidney transplant patients versus healthy children and other previous studies. It is essential to address these suboptimal rates to protect the health of these vulnerable patients. Future research should focus on targeted interventions to improve vaccination rates and outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Trasplante de Riñón , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Vacunas Virales , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación
7.
Vaccine ; 42(2): 322-331, 2024 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between socio-demographic determinants and uptake of childhood Measles, Mumps & Rubella (MMR) vaccines and the association between pregnant women's pertussis vaccine uptake and their children's MMR vaccine uptake. METHODS: We used nationally-representative linked mother-baby electronic records from the United Kingdom's Clinical-Practice-Research-Datalink. We created a birth cohort of children born between 01.01.2000 and 12.12.2020. We estimated the proportion vaccinated with first MMR vaccine by age 2 years and first and second MMR vaccines by age 5 years. We used survival-analysis and Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between deprivation, ethnicity and maternal age and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and children's MMR uptake. RESULTS: Overall, 89.4 % (710,797/795,497) of children had first MMR by age 2 years and 92.6 % (736,495/795,497) by age 5 years. Among children still in the cohort when second MMR was due, 85.9 % (478,480/557,050) had two MMRs by age 5 years. Children from the most-deprived areas, children of Black ethnicity and children of mothers aged < 20 years had increased risk of being unvaccinated compared with children from the least-deprived areas, White children and children of mothers aged 31-40 years: first MMR by 5 years, adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR):0.86 (CI:0.85-0.87), HR:0.87 (CI:0.85-0.88) & HR:0.89 (CI:0.88-0.90) respectively. Deprivation was the determinant associated with the greatest risk of missed second MMR: adjusted HR:0.82 (CI:0.81-0.83). Children of mothers vaccinated in pregnancy were more likely than children of unvaccinated mothers to have MMR vaccines after adjusting for ethnicity, deprivation, and maternal age (First and Second MMRs adjusted HRs:1.43 (CI:1.41-1.45), 1.49 (CI:1.45-1.53). CONCLUSION: Children from most-deprived areas are less likely to have MMR vaccines compared with children from least-deprived areas. Mothers who take up pregnancy vaccines are more likely to have their children vaccinated with MMR. Healthcare services should promote and facilitate access to both maternal and childhood vaccines during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Estudios de Cohortes , Demografía , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/epidemiología , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Vacunación
8.
Rev Bras Epidemiol ; 26: e230030, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377251

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the spatial behavior of hepatitis A, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), and varicella vaccination coverage in children and its relationship with socioeconomic determinants in the state of Minas Gerais. METHODS: This ecological study investigated records of doses administered to children, extracted from the Immunization Information System of 853 municipalities in Minas Gerais, in 2020. We analyzed the vaccination coverage and socioeconomic factors. Spatial scan statistics were used to identify spatial clusters and measure the relative risk based on the vaccination coverage indicator and the Bivariate Moran Index, and thus detect socioeconomic factors correlated with the spatial distribution of vaccination. We used the cartographic base of the state and its municipalities and the ArcGIS and SPSS software programs. RESULTS: Hepatitis A (89.0%), MMR (75.7%), and varicella (89.0%) showed low vaccination coverage. All vaccines analyzed had significant clusters. The clusters most likely to vaccinate their population were mainly located in the Central, Midwest, South Central, and Northwest regions, while the least likely were in the North, Northeast, and Triângulo do Sul regions. The municipal human development index, urbanization rate, and gross domestic product were spatially dependent on vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial behavior of hepatitis A, MMR, and varicella vaccination coverage is heterogeneous and associated with socioeconomic factors. We emphasize that vaccination records require attention and should be continuously monitored to improve the quality of information used in services and research.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Hepatitis A , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Cobertura de Vacunación , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Brasil/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Conducta Espacial , Vacunación
9.
World J Pediatr ; 19(11): 1062-1070, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can damage the immune system, and may result in a loss of protection from infectious diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these treatments on the decrease in antibody titers of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and seroconversion post-revaccination of MMR. METHODS: After completion of treatment for primary diseases, participants received an MMR revaccination. Antibody titers for MMR before revaccination were analyzed for all 110 children. After revaccination, 68 participants received a follow-up evaluation of  antibody titer and adverse reaction. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed that therapeutic schedules were the only factor correlated with lack of antibody titers for measles after completing treatment (P = 0.008), while for mumps and rubella, no statistically significant difference was observed. Importantly, our study clearly demonstrated positive seroconversion rates for measles (97.5%), mumps (81.0%), and rubella (93.2%), with antibody levels rising across the board and peaking at around 6 months following revaccination. However, 6 months after revaccination, a downtrend of antibody titer levels was observed, which is comparatively earlier than the waning immunity observed in healthy children. Furthermore, we found MMR revaccination to be safe, with only a single adverse reaction (local pain at the injection site) reported. CONCLUSIONS: MMR revaccination is immunogenic for the population. We suggest periodic monitoring of antibody titers, in addition to a booster vaccination, although the optimal timing of booster vaccination remains to be investigated further.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Inmunización Secundaria/efectos adversos , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos
10.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(2): e14043, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36880572

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of doses as well as the role for measurement of postvaccination titers after measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccination in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients remains unknown. METHODS: In the present study, we assessed humoral immunity against measles, mumps and rubella before and after MMR vaccination in 187 adults who received at least one dose of the MMR vaccine after HCT. RESULTS: Among those with baseline titers, posttransplant prevaccination seroprotection rates were 56%, 30%, and 54% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively; and significantly lower in allogeneic versus autologous HCT recipients for measles (39% vs. 80%, p = .0001), mumps (22% vs. 41%; p = .02) and rubella (48% vs. 62%, p = .12). Among those who were seronegative at baseline, seroconversion rates after one dose of MMR were 69%, 56%, and 97% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively. Seronegative patients after one dose of MMR (i.e., nonresponders) seroconverted for measles and mumps after a second MMR vaccine dose. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate successful restoration of protective immunity against measles, mumps, and rubella after vaccination in adult HCT recipients; one dose of MMR elicited protective titers in the majority of patients, and a second vaccine dose was immunogenic in nonresponders.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Adulto , Humanos , Lactante , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Receptores de Trasplantes , Vacunación
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946817

RESUMEN

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is usually recommended from 24 months after a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Some authors have demonstrated that the MMR vaccination can be safe from 12 months post-HSCT in non-immunosuppressed patients, as recommended by the Brazilian National Immunization Program/Ministry of Health, since 2006. The objectives of this study were to evaluate when patients received MMR vaccine after an HSCT in our care service and if there were reports of any side effects. We retrospectively reviewed the records of HSCT recipients who received at least one MMR dose in our care service, a quaternary teaching hospital in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, from 2017 to 2021. We identified 82 patients: 75.6% (90.1% in the autologous group and 45.1% in the allogeneic group) were vaccinated before 23 months post-transplantation. None reported side effects following the vaccination. Our data support that the MMR vaccination is safe from 12 to 23 months after HSCT.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Humanos , Lactante , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Brasil , Sarampión/prevención & control , Sarampión/inducido químicamente , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Paperas/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunación
12.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 360-367, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated under immunosuppression, the immune status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been fully assessed prior to immunosuppressive therapy. AIMS: To investigate antiviral serostatus against viruses requiring live vaccines for prevention in IBD patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This multicenter study included IBD patients who were aged <40 years and were treated with thiopurine monotherapy, molecular-targeted monotherapy, or combination therapy. Gender- and age-matched healthy subjects (HS) living in the same areas were included as control group. Antibody titers against measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: A total of 437 IBD patients (163 ulcerative colitis [UC] and 274 Crohn's disease [CD]) and 225 HS were included in the final analysis. Compared with HS, IBD patients had lower seropositivity rates for measles (IBD vs. HS = 83.91% vs. 85.33%), rubella (77.55% vs. 84.89%), mumps (37.50% vs. 37.78%), and varicella (91.26% vs. 96.44%). Gender- and age-adjusted seropositivity rates were lower in UC patients than in both CD patients and HS for measles (UC, CD, and HS = 81.60%, 85.29%, and 85.33%), rubella (76.40%, 78.23%, and 84.89%), mumps (27.16%, 43.70%, and 37.78%), and varicella (90.80%, 91.54%, and 96.44%); the difference was significant for all viruses except measles. Divided by the degree of immunosuppression, there were no significant differences in seropositivity rates among IBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients, especially those with UC, exhibit reduced seropositivity rates and may benefit from screening prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Varicela/prevención & control , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control
13.
Multimedia | Recursos Multimedia | ID: multimedia-9970

RESUMEN

Encuentros de gestión para la Campaña de vacunacion de sarampión, rubéola, parotiditis y polio que se realiza a nivel nacional. Esta capacitación específica a nivel de la provincia de Buenos Aires está destinada a los referentes del Programa de control de enfermedades inmunoprevenibles de las regiones sanitarias, de los municipios y de los vacunatorios


Asunto(s)
Vacunación/métodos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Poliomielitis/prevención & control
14.
Pediatrics ; 148(6)2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34814181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite a >99% reduction in US mumps cases after the introduction of mumps vaccine in 1967, outbreaks have occurred in schools and other settings involving vaccinated children and adolescents since 2006. METHODS: We analyzed mumps cases reported by US health departments to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. We present the incidence and vaccination status of pediatric cases (age <18 years) during 2007-2019 and describe demographic, clinical, and vaccination characteristics of pediatric cases reported during the most recent resurgence in 2015-2019. RESULTS: During 2007-2019, 9172 pediatric cases were reported, accounting for a median of 32% of all cases reported each year (range: 13%-59%). A median of 87% (range: 81%-94%) of pediatric patients each year had previously received ≥1 measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine dose. During 2015-2019, of 5461 pediatric cases reported, only 2% of those with known import status (74%) were associated with international travel. One percent of patients had complications and 2% were hospitalized. Among patients aged ≥1 year with known vaccination status (72%), 74% of 1- to 4-year-olds had received ≥1 MMR dose and 86% of 5- to 17-year-olds had received ≥2 MMR doses. Since 2016, pediatric mumps cases have been reported in most US states each year (range: 38-45 states). CONCLUSIONS: Since 2007, one-third of US reported mumps cases occurred in children and adolescents, the majority of whom were vaccinated. Clinicians should suspect mumps in patients with parotitis or mumps complications, regardless of age, travel history, and vaccination status.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Paperas/epidemiología , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Paperas/complicaciones , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Neurology ; 97(16): 767-775, 2021 10 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34475124

RESUMEN

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has triggered a global effort to rapidly develop and deploy effective and safe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations. Vaccination has been one of the most effective medical interventions in human history, although potential safety risks of novel vaccines must be monitored, identified, and quantified. Adverse events must be carefully assessed to define whether they are causally associated with vaccination or coincidence. Neurologic adverse events following immunizations are overall rare but with significant morbidity and mortality when they occur. Here, we review neurologic conditions seen in the context of prior vaccinations and the current data to date on select COVID-19 vaccines including mRNA vaccines and the adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S Johnson & Johnson (Janssen/J&J).


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Vacunación/tendencias , Ad26COVS1 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humanos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Vacunas contra Poliovirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Poliovirus/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
16.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 07 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34372517

RESUMEN

Mumps is a vaccine-preventable infectious disease diffuse worldwide. The implementation of mumps vaccination reduced largely the spread of infection. On 11,327 Medical School students the prevalence of mumps positive antibodies was evaluated according to dose/doses of vaccine, year of birth and sex. Compliance to mumps vaccine was low in students born before 1990 but increased consistently after this year, above all compliance to two doses, due to the implementation of the vaccine offer. Positivity of mumps antibodies is significantly (p < 0.0001) lower in students vaccinated once (71.2%) compared to those vaccinated twice (85.4%). In addition, students born after 1995, largely vaccinated twice, showed a seropositivity near to 90%. Further, females had a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher proportion of positive antibodies after vaccination than males, both one (74.6% vs. 64.7%) and two doses (86.8% vs. 82.9%). Finally, seropositivity after two vaccine doses remains high (86.1%) even 15 years after the second dose. In conclusion, the research highlighted that vaccination against mumps reaches a good level of coverage only after two doses of vaccine persisting at high levels over 15 years and induces a more significant response in females.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Paperas/epidemiología , Paperas/inmunología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Paperas/prevención & control , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunación
17.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e205, 2021 08 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446124

RESUMEN

On 16-17 January 2020, four suspected mumps cases were reported to the local Public Health Authorities with an epidemiological link to a local school and football club. Of 18 suspected cases identified, 14 were included in this study. Laboratory results confirmed mumps virus as the cause and further sequencing identified genotype G. Our findings highlight that even with a high MMR vaccine coverage, mumps outbreaks in children and young adults can occur. Since most of the cases had documented immunity for mumps, we hypothesise that waning immunity or discordant mumps virus strains are likely explanations for this outbreak.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Virus de la Parotiditis/inmunología , Paperas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/genética , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Paperas/virología , Virus de la Parotiditis/genética , Virus de la Parotiditis/patogenicidad , Portugal/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
18.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 20(7): 811-826, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096442

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Measles, mumps, and rubella incidence decreased drastically following vaccination programs' implementation. However, measles and mumps' resurgence was recently reported, outbreaks still occur, and challenges remain to control these diseases. AREAS COVERED: This qualitative narrative review provides an objective appraisal of the literature regarding current challenges in controlling measles, mumps, rubella infections, and interventions to address them. EXPERT OPINION: While vaccines against measles, mumps, and rubella (including trivalent vaccines) are widely used and effective, challenges to control these diseases are mainly related to insufficient immunization coverage and changing vaccination needs owing to new global environment (e.g. traveling, migration, population density). By understanding disease transmission peculiarities by setting, initiatives are needed to optimize vaccination policies and increase vaccination coverage, which was further negatively impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. Also, awareness of the potential severity of infections and the role of vaccines should increase. Reminder systems, vaccination of disadvantaged, high-risk and difficult-to-reach populations, accessibility of vaccination, healthcare infrastructure, and vaccination services management should improve. Outbreak preparedness should be strengthened, including implementation of high-quality surveillance systems to monitor epidemiology. While the main focus should be on these public health initiatives to increase vaccination coverage, slightly more benefits could come from evolution of current vaccines.


PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYWhat is the context?Measles, mumps, and rubella are highly contagious diseases associated with significant medical and societal burden. Effective vaccines against these diseases are available, and the implementation of vaccination programs drastically reduced disease incidence globally. However, reports of measles and mumps outbreaks in the last few years highlight remaining challenges to eliminate these diseases.What does the review highlight?We conducted a literature review to identify challenges associated with controlling measles, mumps, and rubella infections, and interventions needed to address them. We identified 11 challenges mainly related to low immunization coverage and vaccine characteristics. Societal challenges could be addressed by increasing awareness of disease severity and vaccines impact, targeting high-risk, unvaccinated, and under-vaccinated populations, improving vaccination access, setting up clear outbreak preparedness plans, and implementing country-specific vaccination policies. System weaknesses could be addressed through improving vaccination services and health infrastructure, implementing high-quality surveillance, patient invite, and reminder systems, ensuring vaccine implementation and long-term supply. Interventions related to vaccine characteristic challenges could include adaptation of vaccination schedules (shorter interval between doses, administration of a third dose) and development of vaccines against emerging strains.What is the take-home message?Policymakers should support the following strategies to increase vaccination coverage and reach elimination of measles, mumps, and rubella: strengthening health systems and vaccination access; raising awareness of disease severity and vaccination impact; limiting disease propagation owing to global changing environment and population dynamics (traveling, migration); improving surveillance systems to rapidly address the immunity gaps against disease resurgence.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Sarampión/prevención & control , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/psicología , Paperas/epidemiología , Paperas/psicología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/epidemiología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología
20.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(6): 590-596, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on vaccine effectiveness (VE) may encourage vaccination and help fight the reemergence of measles and mumps in Europe. However, limited data exist on real-life effectiveness of individual measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines. This study evaluated VE of GSK's MMR vaccine ("Priorix") against measles and mumps. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study used UK data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics database to identify children 1-13 years old diagnosed with measles or mumps from January 2006 to December 2018. Cases were matched to controls according to birth month/year and practice region. Cases were identified using clinical codes (without laboratory confirmation). "Priorix" exposure was identified using vaccine batch identifiers. Children exposed to other MMR vaccines were excluded. Adjusted VE was estimated for ≥1 vaccine dose in all children, and for 1 dose and ≥2 doses in children ≥4 years at diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 299 measles cases matched with 1196 controls (87.6% <4 years old), and 243 mumps cases matched with 970 controls (74.2% <4 years old) were considered. VE for ≥1 dose in all children was 78.0% (97.5% confidence interval: 67.2%-85.3%) for measles and 66.7% (48.1%-78.6%) for mumps. In children ≥4 years old, VE after 1 dose was 74.6% (-21.7% to 94.7%) for measles and 82.3% (32.7%-95.3%) for mumps, and VE after ≥2 doses was 94.4% (79.7%-98.5%) for measles and 86.5% (64.0%-94.9%) for mumps. CONCLUSIONS: "Priorix" is effective in preventing measles and mumps in real-life settings.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Paperas/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...