Asunto(s)
Meningitis Meningocócica , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , Lactante , Meningitis Meningocócica/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Nigeria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of antibiotics for treating gonococcal infections is compromised due to escalating antibiotic resistance; and the development of an effective gonococcal vaccine has been challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that the licensed meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB is effective against gonococcal infections due to cross-reacting antibodies and 95% genetic homology between the two bacteria, Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, that cause the diseases. This project aims to undertake epidemiological and genomic surveillance to evaluate the long-term protection of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections in the Northern Territory (NT) and South Australia (SA), and to determine the potential benefit of a booster vaccine doses to provide longer-term protection against gonococcal infections. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This observational study will provide long-term evaluation results of the effectiveness of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections at 4-7 years post 4CMenB programme implementation. Routine notifiable disease notifications will be the basis for assessing the impact of the vaccine on gonococcal infections. Pathology laboratories will provide data on the number and percentage of N. gonorrhoeae positive tests relative to all tests administered and will coordinate molecular sequencing for isolates. Genome sequencing results will be provided by SA Pathology and Territory Pathology/New South Wales Health Pathology, and linked with notification data by SA Health and NT Health. There are limitations in observational studies including the potential for confounding. Confounders will be analysed separately for each outcome/comparison. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol and all study documents have been reviewed and approved by the SA Department for Health and Well-being Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/HRE00308), and the evaluation will commence in the NT on receipt of approval from the NT Health and Menzies School of Health Research Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings and public forums.
Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Humanos , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Northern Territory/epidemiología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/inmunología , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , FemeninoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Gonorrhoea, the sexually transmissible infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, has a substantial impact on sexual and reproductive health globally with an estimated 82 million new infections each year worldwide. N. gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance continues to escalate, and disease control is largely reliant on effective therapy as there is no proven effective gonococcal vaccine available. However, there is increasing evidence from observational cohort studies that the serogroup B meningococcal vaccine four-component meningitis B vaccine (4CMenB) (Bexsero), licensed to prevent invasive disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis, may provide cross-protection against the closely related bacterium N. gonorrhoeae. This study will evaluate the efficacy of 4CMenB against N. gonorrhoeae infection in men (cis and trans), transwomen and non-binary people who have sex with men (hereafter referred to as GBM+). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial in GBM+, either HIV-negative on pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV or living with HIV (CD4 count >350 cells/mm3), who have had a diagnosis of gonorrhoea or infectious syphilis in the last 18 months (a key characteristic associated with a high risk of N. gonorrhoeae infection). Participants are randomised 1:1 to receive two doses of 4CMenB or placebo 3 months apart. Participants have 3-monthly visits over 24 months, which include testing for N. gonorrhoeae and other sexually transmissible infections, collection of demographics, sexual behaviour risks and antibiotic use, and collection of research samples for analysis of N. gonorrhoeae-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses. The primary outcome is the incidence of the first episode of N. gonorrhoeae infection, as determined by nucleic acid amplification tests, post month 4. Additional outcomes consider the incidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic N. gonorrhoeae infection at different anatomical sites (ie, urogenital, anorectum or oropharynx), incidence by N. gonorrhoeae genotype and antimicrobial resistance phenotype, and level and functional activity of N. gonorrhoeae-specific antibodies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia (ref: 2020/ETH01084). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and via presentation at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04415424.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Gonorrea , Infecciones por VIH , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/etiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/mortalidad , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Brotes de EnfermedadesRESUMEN
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of medical and public health experts that provides advice to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, normally meets 3 times per year to develop US vaccine recommendations. The ACIP met October 25 to 26, 2023, to discuss meningococcal vaccines, mpox vaccines, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines, influenza vaccines, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, and the combined pediatric and adult immunization schedules for 2024. The ACIP also held special meetings on September 12 and September 22 to discuss COVID-19 2023-2024 vaccine recommendations and RSV immunization in pregnant women. This update summarizes the proceedings of these meetings that are most relevant to the pediatric population. Major updates for pediatric clinicians include recommendations for XBB monovalent COVID-19 immunization for the 2023-2024 respiratory season, the recently licensed pentavalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine and mpox vaccination in high-risk young adults, and discussion regarding the parallel strategies of protection against RSV disease in infants via maternal immunization during pregnancy or direct prophylaxis of infants with nirsevimab.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Lactante , Adulto Joven , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Comités Consultivos , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios , COVID-19/prevención & control , InmunizaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To outline the management of a community cluster of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases, including key factors for decision making and the choice and implementation of control measures. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive report of cluster management. METHODS: Subtyping of IMD cases identified a number of potentially linked cases in a defined geographical area. An Incident Management Team (IMT) was convened to coordinate the public health response. A case definition was developed in order to identify further cases within the cluster. RESULTS: Four cases of IMD met the case definition and were initially considered as part of this cluster. Three resided in the same small town, which was the focus for public health management. The IMT agreed that it would be proportionate to instigate additional control measures. The population at higher risk of infection were identified, and a supplementary vaccination programme was rolled out in the community. Over five clinics, 45.6% (639/1401) of the target cohort received at least one dose of the vaccine, with 34.7% (486/1401) receiving both doses. Inequalities in uptake were observed by sex, age and deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for public health responses to IMD clusters is complex. Informed by epidemiological evidence, numerous partners engaged in collaborative decision making, which was critical for the effective implementation of the community response. Links between the local authority public health team and the community enabled the use of existing structures and relationships to maximise the number of vaccinations delivered. No further cases of IMD linked to this cluster were identified.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Incidencia , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Programas de InmunizaciónRESUMEN
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of medical and public health experts that provides advice to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, normally meets 3 times per year to develop US vaccine recommendations. The ACIP met June 21-23, 2023, to discuss respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines, influenza vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, meningococcal vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccines. The ACIP also held a special meeting on August 3, 2023, to discuss RSV prophylaxis in infants. This update summarizes the proceedings of these meetings that are most relevant to the pediatric population. Major updates for pediatric clinicians include a new recommendation for the monoclonal antibody nirsevimab for prevention of RSV disease in all infants, recommendations regarding use of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and discussion of potential forthcoming changes to meningococcal and COVID-19 vaccination recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunas Meningococicas , Lactante , Estados Unidos , Niño , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Comités Consultivos , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios , Inmunización , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Esquemas de InmunizaciónRESUMEN
This case-control study examines reported cases of gonorrhea among recipients of meningococcal group B vaccine at 2 universities in Oregon.
Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Incidencia , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Universidades , EstudiantesAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Portador Sano , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Neisseria meningitidis , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas , Portador Sano/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An effective, affordable, multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine is needed to prevent epidemic meningitis in the African meningitis belt. Data on the safety and immunogenicity of NmCV-5, a pentavalent vaccine targeting the A, C, W, Y, and X serogroups, have been limited. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, noninferiority trial involving healthy 2-to-29-year-olds in Mali and Gambia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular dose of NmCV-5 or the quadrivalent vaccine MenACWY-D. Immunogenicity was assessed at day 28. The noninferiority of NmCV-5 to MenACWY-D was assessed on the basis of the difference in the percentage of participants with a seroresponse (defined as prespecified changes in titer; margin, lower limit of the 96% confidence interval [CI] above -10 percentage points) or geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios (margin, lower limit of the 98.98% CI >0.5). Serogroup X responses in the NmCV-5 group were compared with the lowest response among the MenACWY-D serogroups. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1800 participants received NmCV-5 or MenACWY-D. In the NmCV-5 group, the percentage of participants with a seroresponse ranged from 70.5% (95% CI, 67.8 to 73.2) for serogroup A to 98.5% (95% CI, 97.6 to 99.2) for serogroup W; the percentage with a serogroup X response was 97.2% (95% CI, 96.0 to 98.1). The overall difference between the two vaccines in seroresponse for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.2 percentage points (96% CI, -0.3 to 3.1) for serogroup W to 20.5 percentage points (96% CI, 15.4 to 25.6) for serogroup A. The overall GMT ratios for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.7 (98.98% CI, 1.5 to 1.9) for serogroup A to 2.8 (98.98% CI, 2.3 to 3.5) for serogroup C. The serogroup X component of the NmCV-5 vaccine generated seroresponses and GMTs that met the prespecified noninferiority criteria. The incidence of systemic adverse events was similar in the two groups (11.1% in the NmCV-5 group and 9.2% in the MenACWY-D group). CONCLUSIONS: For all four serotypes in common with the MenACWY-D vaccine, the NmCV-5 vaccine elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those elicited by the MenACWY-D vaccine. NmCV-5 also elicited immune responses to serogroup X. No safety concerns were evident. (Funded by the U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03964012.).
Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Estado de Salud , Meningitis , Vacunas Meningococicas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Humanos , Gambia/epidemiología , Malí/epidemiología , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Meningitis/epidemiología , Meningitis/prevención & control , Epidemias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Representative information on disease course and outcome of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is important because of the shift in meningococcal epidemiology that recently occurred in the Netherlands. With this study, we update earlier research on the burden of IMD in the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using Dutch surveillance data on IMD from July 2011 to May 2020. Clinical information was collected from hospital records. The effect of age, serogroup, and clinical manifestation on disease course and outcome was assessed in multivariable logistic regression analyses. Grouping of infecting isolates was performed by Ouchterlony gel diffusion or by PCR. RESULTS: Clinical information was collected for 278 IMD cases of which the majority had IMD-B (55%), followed by IMD-W (27%), IMD-Y (13%), and IMD-C (5%). Most patients presented with meningitis (32%) or sepsis (30%). Hospitalisation for ≥ 10 days was most frequent among 24-64 year olds (67%). ICU admission was highest among 24-64 year olds (60%), and in case of sepsis (70%), or sepsis plus meningitis (61%). Sequelae at discharge was lower for patients with mild meningococcaemia compared to patients with sepsis plus meningitis (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51). The overall case fatality rate was 7%, and was highest for IMD-Y (14%) and IMD-W (13%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: IMD remains a disease with high morbidity and mortality. Sepsis (with or without meningitis) is associated with a more severe disease course and outcome compared to other clinical manifestations. The high disease burden can be partly prevented by meningococcal vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Meningitis Meningocócica , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Sepsis , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Sepsis/epidemiología , Serogrupo , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Meningitis Meningocócica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea is an ongoing public health concern due to its rising incidence and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. There are an estimated 82 million new Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections each year, with several populations at higher risk for gonococcal infection, including gay and bisexual men (GBM). If left untreated, infection can lead to serious morbidity including infertility, sepsis and increased risk of HIV acquisition. Development of a gonorrhoea vaccine has been challenging, however there is observational evidence that serogroup B meningococcal vaccines, used to protect against the closely related bacteria Neisseria meningitidis, could provide cross-protection against N. gonorrhoeae. METHODS: The MenGO (Meningococcal vaccine efficacy against Gonorrhoea) study is a phase III open-label randomised control trial in GBM to evaluate the efficacy of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, 4CMenB, against gonorrhoea. A total of 130 GBM will be recruited at the Gold Coast Sexual Health Clinic, Australia, and randomised to either receive 2 doses of 4CMenB or no intervention. Participants will be followed up for 24 months with testing for N. gonorrhoeae and other sexually transmissible infections every three months. Demographics, sexual behaviour risk, antibiotic use, and blood samples for analysis of N. gonorrhoeae-specific immune responses, will be collected during the study. The primary outcome is the number of N. gonorrhoeae infections in participants over 2 years measured by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Secondary outcomes are vaccine-induced N. gonorrhoeae-specific immune responses, and adverse events in trial participants. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine if the 4CMenB vaccine is able to reduce N. gonorrhoeae infection. If shown to be effective, 4CMenB could be used in gonococcal prevention. Analysis of 4CMenB-induced immune responses will increase understanding of the type of immune response needed to prevent N. gonorrhoeae, which may enable identification of a potential correlate of protection to aid future gonorrhoea vaccine development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001478101) on 25 October 2019.
Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Humanos , Masculino , Australia/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Serogrupo , Conducta SexualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In September 2015, the four-component, protein-based meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) became available for private purchase in Spain. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide matched case-control study to assess the effectiveness of 4CMenB in preventing invasive meningococcal disease in children. The study included all laboratory-confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease in children younger than 60 months of age between October 5, 2015, and October 6, 2019, in Spain. Each case patient was matched with four controls according to date of birth and province. 4CMenB vaccination status of the case patients and controls was compared with the use of multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: We compared 306 case patients (243 [79.4%] with serogroup B disease) with 1224 controls. A total of 35 case patients (11.4%) and 298 controls (24.3%) had received at least one dose of 4CMenB. The effectiveness of complete vaccination with 4CMenB (defined as receipt of at least 2 doses, administered in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations) was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57 to 87) against invasive meningococcal disease caused by any serogroup, and partial vaccination was 54% (95% CI, 18 to 74) effective. Complete vaccination resulted in an effectiveness of 71% (95% CI, 45 to 85) against meningococcal serogroup B disease. Vaccine effectiveness with at least one dose of 4CMenB was 64% (95% CI, 41 to 78) against serogroup B disease and 82% (95% CI, 21 to 96) against non-serogroup B disease. With the use of the genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System, serogroup B strains that were expected to be covered by 4CMenB were detected in 44 case patients, none of whom had been vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Complete vaccination with 4CMenB was found to be effective in preventing invasive disease by serogroup B and non-serogroup B meningococci in children younger than 5 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones Meningocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Neisseria meningitidis , EspañaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diagnoses of gonorrhoea in England rose by 26% between 2018 and 2019. Recent evidence that a vaccine against meningococcal B disease currently offered to infants in the UK (4CMenB) could additionally protect (with 31% efficacy) against gonorrhoea has led to renewed hope for a vaccine. A Phase 2 proof-of-concept trial of 4CMenB vaccination against gonorrhoea in adults is currently underway. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential public health impact of adolescent gonorrhoea vaccination in England, considering different implementation strategies. METHODS: We developed a deterministic transmission-dynamic model of gonorrhoea infection among heterosexual 13-64-year-olds stratified by age, sex and sexual activity. We explored the impact of a National Immunisation Programme (NIP) among 14-year-olds for a vaccine with 31% efficacy, 6 years' duration of protection, and 85% uptake. We also explored how impact might change for varying efficacy (20-50%) and uptake (75-95%), the addition of a catch-up programme, the use of boosters, and varying duration of protection. RESULTS: An NIP against gonorrhoea could lead to 50,000 (95% credible interval, CrI 31,000-80,000) and 849,000 (95%CrI 476,000-1,568,000) gonorrhoea infections being averted over 10 and 70 years, respectively, in England, for a vaccine with 31% efficacy and 85% uptake. This is equivalent to 25% (95%CrI 17-33%) of heterosexual infections being averted over 70 years. Vaccine impact is predicted to increase over time and be greatest among 13-18-year-olds (39% of infections 95%CrI 31-49% averted) over 70 years. Varying vaccine efficacy and duration of protection had a noticeable effect on impact. Catch-up and booster vaccination increased the short- and long-term impact, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A partially-effective vaccine against gonorrhoea infection, delivered to 14-year-olds alongside the MenACWY vaccine, could have an important population impact on gonorrhoea. Catch-up and booster vaccination could be considered alongside cohort vaccination to increase impact.
Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Lactante , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Salud Pública , Vacunación , Prueba de Estudio ConceptualRESUMEN
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but serious and potentially fatal condition mainly affecting children and adolescents. Active surveillance between 2005 and 2016 at Tijuana General Hospital, Mexico, indicated that the incidence of IMD in Tijuana was higher than previously thought, at 2.69 per 100,000 population aged <16 years. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic burden associated with 51 IMD cases in children aged <16 years identified over the 11 years of active surveillance at Tijuana General Hospital, Mexico. Healthcare resource usage for the IMD cases was obtained from the hospital database and combined with unit costs from the hospital purchasing department or national databases to estimate total healthcare costs over a follow-up period of 3 months. Societal costs were represented by the value of lost wages for parents or guardians. All costs were expressed in US$. Over the 11-year study period there were 51 IMD cases, of which 13 (25%) were fatal. The total cost for all 51 cases over the 11-year study period was US$1,054,499 (average per case US$20,676), of which direct healthcare costs comprised US$1,029,948 (average per case US$20,195) and societal costs US$24,551 (average per case US$481). Extrapolated to the population of Tijuana region aged <16 years, the estimated annual economic burden of IMD was US$268,794. The major cost driver was the cost of hospitalization. These data illustrate the significant economic burden associated with IMD in Tijuana, and will be useful in assessing optimal vaccination programs against meningococcal disease in Mexico.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Vacunación , Hospitalización , Incidencia , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This review considers the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease in infants, to examine and critique meningococcal disease prevention in this population through vaccination. High rates of meningococcal disease and poor outcomes, particularly for very young infants, highlight the importance of meningococcal vaccination in early infancy. Although effective and safe meningococcal vaccines are available for use from 6 weeks of age, they are not recommended globally. Emerging real-world data from the increased incorporation of these vaccines within immunization programs inform recommendations regarding effectiveness, appropriate vaccination schedule, possible long-term safety effects, and persistence of antibody responses. Importantly, to protect infants from IMD, national vaccination recommendations should be consistent with available data regarding vaccine safety, effectiveness, and disease risk.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Meningococcal disease is caused by Neisseria meningitidis; 13 serogroups have been identified and differentiated from each other through their capsular polysaccharide. Serotypes A, B, C, W, X, and Y are responsible for nearly all infections worldwide. The most common clinical manifestations are meningitis and invasive meningococcal disease, both characterized by high mortality and long-term sequelae. The infection rate is higher in children younger than 1 year and in adolescents, who are frequently asymptomatic carriers. Vaccination is the most effective method of preventing infection and transmission. Currently, both monovalent meningococcal vaccines (against A, B, and C serotypes) and quadrivalent meningococcal vaccines (against serogroups ACYW) are available and recommended according to local epidemiology. The purpose of this article is to describe the meningococcal vaccines and to identify instruments that are useful for reducing transmission and implementing the vaccination coverage. This aim could be reached by switching from the monovalent to the quadrivalent vaccine in the first year of life, increasing vaccine promotion against ACYW serotypes among adolescents, and extending the free offer of the anti-meningococcal B vaccine to teens, co-administering it with others proposed in the same age group. Greater awareness of the severity of the disease and increased health education through web and social networks could represent the best strategies for promoting adhesion and active participation in the vaccination campaign. Finally, the development of a licensed universal meningococcal vaccine should be another important objective.
Asunto(s)
Meningitis Meningocócica , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Meningitis Meningocócica/epidemiología , Meningitis Meningocócica/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Meningococcal disease is highly transmissible, life-threatening and leaves significant sequelae in survivors. Every year, India, which has a plethora of risk factors for meningococcal disease, reports around 3000 endemic cases. However, the overall disease burden and serogroup distribution are unknown, creating a setting of general disease negligence and unawareness. Vaccination with quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine A, C, W, and Y is only recommended for high-risk children, and there is no overall guidance for meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination. MenB vaccines, which recently have been licensed in many countries but not in India, have significantly aided the fight against meningococcal disease. However, these MenB vaccines are not available in India. An Expert Consensus Group meeting was held with leading meningococcal disease experts to better understand the current disease epidemiology, particularly serogroup B, the prevalence gaps, and feasible ways to bridge them. The proceedings are presented in this paper.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Niño , Consenso , Costo de Enfermedad , Procesos de Grupo , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , SerogrupoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine in Brazil. METHODS: Ecological study assessing all invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) and meningococcal C disease (MenC) cases reported in all age groups, from 2001 to 2019. MCC was implemented in 2010. Data were collected on the DATASUS platform. Joinpoint regression was performed to assess the annual percent change (APC) of the incidence rate. RESULTS: Invasive meningococcal disease incidence decreased in all Brazilian regions from 2001 onwards, without apparent additional reduction attributable to MCC vaccine in the North, Northeast and South. The higher and statistically significant APC reduction in all age groups, in the North and South, and in children <5 years, in the Northeast, occurred between 2001 and 2011 (-15.4%), 2004 and 2012 (-14.4%), and 2001 and 2013 (-10.3%), respectively, before MCC vaccine implementation. Annual incidence of MenC in children under 5 years significantly fell in the North (-6.8%; 2011-2018), Southeast (-40.6%; 2010-2015) and Midwest (-48.6%; 2010-2014), which may be attributable to MCC implementation. CONCLUSION: Invasive meningococcal disease and MenC behaved differently after MCC vaccine implementation in Brazil during this 18-year time-series analysis. This suggests that the control of IMD should be based on multiple public health care measures and considered on a regional basis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunas ConjugadasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy 16- to 23-year-olds based on shared clinical decision-making between the patient and the provider. There has been some confusion regarding how to implement this recommendation. METHODS: Through discussions among the authors, a review of relevant literature, and consultation with vaccine experts, we developed educational materials for providers that included a patient handout to help initiate and guide conversations leading to shared clinical decision-making for the Meningococcal B vaccine. Materials were distributed to 88 health care providers who subsequently completed surveys to evaluate their impressions of the materials and the utility of the materials for clinical practice. RESULTS: The survey results from the 88 providers revealed that they valued the materials; 93% percent indicated they would share these materials with colleagues, and 95% agreed or strongly agreed that they would share these materials with patient families. Responses to an open-ended question indicate that some providers initiated discussions regarding the Meningococcal B vaccine in ways that truncated conversation rather than encouraging a shared decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the materials developed and implemented for this project support the initiation of, and help standardize provider conversations regarding, Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy adolescents.