Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 172
Filtrar
1.
Am J Mens Health ; 18(3): 15579883241260511, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872304

RESUMEN

The Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (June 2022) overturned federal protection of abortion rights, resulting in significant impact on both male and female reproductive rights and health care delivery. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent vasectomy at a single academic institution between June 2021 and June 2023. Our objective was to compare the rates of childless and partnerless vasectomies 1 year before and after this ruling, as these men may be more susceptible to postprocedural regret. Of total, 631 men (median age = 39 years, range = 20-70) underwent vasectomy consultation. Total vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 304 (48%) versus 327 (52%). Total childless and partnerless vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 44 (42%) versus 61 (58%) and 43 (46%) versus 50 (54%). Vasectomy completion rate was slightly increased post-Dobbs (90% vs. 88%; p = .240). The post-Dobbs cohort had significantly less children (1.8 vs. 2.0; p = .031). Men in the post-Dobbs era were significantly more likely to be commercially insured (72% vs. 64%) and less likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 6%; p = .002). Men who underwent childless vasectomy were significantly more likely to be younger (36.4 vs. 39.8 years; p < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of Hispanic and Black men in the partnerless cohort compared to the cohort with partners (24% vs. 19% and 9% vs. 2%; p = .002). In conclusion, patients should be counseled on the permanent nature of this procedure, underscoring need for effective and reversible male contraception.


Asunto(s)
Vasectomía , Humanos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Estados Unidos , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos
3.
Fr J Urol ; 34(2): 102583, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717463

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Andrology and urogenital reconstruction are emerging disciplines in French urology. The aim of our study was to evaluate the evolution of andrological surgical procedures over the period 2013-2022 using national data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected national common classification of medical acts (CCAM) coding data for all procedures involving andrological surgery from the Scansanté internet platform set up by the Technical Agency for Information on Hospitalisation, which collects prospectively from healthcare structures all procedures coded according to CCAM coding. All surgical procedures in andrology were selected. The inclusion period extended from 2013 to 2022. RESULTS: In 10 years, the number of vasectomies has increased tenfold, with 29,890 cases in 2022. Vaso-vasostomies remain marginal, with 80 cases per year. Trans-identity surgeries are rising sharply. Vaginoplasties have multiplied by 4 (333 in 2022) and masculinising surgeries have multiplied by 10 (234 in 2022). Penile prosthesis surgery has increased slightly over 10 years. The number of testicular biopsies has remained stable over time, as has the number of surgeries for curvature of the penis. CONCLUSION: Two andrological surgeries are showing very strong growth: vasectomy and transgender surgery. The emergence of these 2 activities is linked to societal aspirations. Urologists need to be trained to meet this demand. NIVEAU DE PREUVE: Grade 4.


Asunto(s)
Vasectomía , Humanos , Francia , Masculino , Femenino , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Andrología
4.
Fr J Urol ; 34(5): 102640, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697266

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolutionary trends concerning vasectomy over the last 8 years in order to better understand the situation and identify measures to be implemented to develop this activity. METHODS: The number of vasectomy procedures performed between 2015 and 2022 was extracted from the Open CCAM file compiled from the national database of the Programme de médicalisation du système d'informations français (PMSI). RESULTS: Over the period 2015-2022, the number of vasectomy procedures increased from 3743 in 2015 to 29,890 in 2022. This increase was observed in all French metropolitan and overseas regions. The number of minimally invasive vasectomies (notably without scalpel) rose sharply, from 313 to 7760. Almost all vasectomies were performed during outpatient hospitalization (0 nights), with fewer than 300 acts reported/year in outpatient care. CONCLUSION: In France, vasectomy is becoming an increasingly frequent contraceptive method. This analysis is in line with recent surveys carried out in France, and tends to prove that more and more couples of childbearing age are in favour of sharing the contraceptive burden.


Asunto(s)
Vasectomía , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/métodos , Humanos , Francia , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/tendencias
5.
Urology ; 179: 80-86, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To update trends in the vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18-64 in the United States (U.S.) between 2014 and 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used commercial health insurance claims data between 2014 and 2021 to calculate the annual vasectomy rate in men aged 18-64 in the U.S. We performed these calculations nationally and by age group, marital status, maternal age of a wife, number of children, U.S. Census Bureau region, geography, geographical region, and state. We calculated the absolute and relative changes in these rates from 2014 to 2021 to study how much and how quickly they changed. RESULTS: The vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18-64 in the U.S. increased by 0.11%-a 26% change-from 2014 (0.427%) to 2021 (0.537%). The absolute changes were greatest in men with 3 or more children (0.489%), with 2 children (0.295%), with a wife not of advanced maternal age (0.276%), and aged 35-44 (0.243%). The relative changes were greatest in men with no children (61%), with a wife of advanced maternal age (40.8%), who were single (40.6%), and aged 18-24 (36.7%). In every region except the Northeast, the absolute and relative changes were greater in rural geographies compared to urban geographies. CONCLUSIONS: The vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18-64 in the U.S. increased between 2014 and 2021. Further investigation is needed to ensure demand for vasectomies may continue to be met.


Asunto(s)
Vasectomía , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Seguro de Salud , Edad Materna , Estados Unidos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/tendencias
6.
Urology ; 153: 175-180, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33812879

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of different fertility options in men who have undergone vasectomy in couples with a female of advanced maternal age (AMA). The options include vasectomy reversal (VR), sperm retrieval (SR) with in vitro fertilization (IVF), and the combination of VR and SR with IVF, which is a treatment pathway that has been understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using TreeAge software, a model-based cost-utility analysis was performed estimating the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in couples with infertility due to vasectomy and advanced female age over a period of one year. The model stratified for female age (35-37, 38-40, >40) and evaluated four strategies: VR followed by natural conception (NC), SR with IVF, VR and SR followed by failed NC and then IVF, and VR and SR followed by failed IVF and then NC. QALY estimates and outcome probabilities were obtained from the literature and average patient charges were calculated from high-volume centers. RESULTS: The most cost-effective fertility strategy was to undergo VR and try for NC (cost-per-QALY: $7,150 (35-37 y), $7,203 (38-40 y), and $7,367 (>40 y)). The second most cost-effective strategy was the "back-up vasectomy reversal": undergo VR and SR, attempt IVF and switch to NC if IVF fails. CONCLUSION: In couples with a history of vasectomy and female of AMA, it is most cost-effective to undergo a VR. If the couple opts for SR for IVF, it is more cost-effective to undergo a concomitant VR than SR alone.


Asunto(s)
Edad Materna , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/economía , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/economía , Recuperación de la Esperma/economía , Vasectomía , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Reoperación/economía , Reoperación/métodos , Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/métodos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Carcinogenesis ; 42(1): 31-37, 2021 02 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772072

RESUMEN

Epidemiological cohort studies investigating the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to update the evidence on the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer. A comprehensively literature search of relevant studies was performed in December 2019 using PubMed. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 eligible cohort studies (16 data sets) with more than four million of participants were eventually included in this meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant higher risk of prostate cancer among men who underwent vasectomy (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13) with obvious heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.001, I2 = 64.2%). Vasectomy was also associated with the risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), which is less likely to be affected from detection bias. In conclusion, findings from this meta-analysis of prospective studies indicate that vasectomy may be positively associated with the risk of prostate cancer. Further large prospective studies with long follow-up are warranted to verify the findings from this meta-analysis. In addition, the potential underlying molecular mechanism needed further exploration with in vitro and animal studies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Vasectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Urology ; 146: 107-112, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011182

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health status of men who have undergone vasectomy versus nonsterilized fertile men. METHODS: Using the National Survey for Family Growth from 2002 to 2017, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on demographic and health data, including health status and health care utilization. RESULTS: Men who have undergone vasectomy are more likely to be older, healthier, have more children, identify as non-Hispanic white, be married, have a higher level of education, earn a higher mean household income, and were more likely to be privately insured than non-sterilized fertile men. On multivariate analysis, men who underwent vasectomy had a better health status despite being older. CONCLUSION: There are significant socioeconomic and health differences between men who elect vasectomy and non-sterilized fertile men. These differences should be considered when considering using sterilized men as a proxy for proven fertile men in epidemiological studies.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Socioeconómicos
9.
Urology ; 143: 130-136, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325136

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the characteristics of urologic surgeons performing vasectomy over time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study examining surgeon characteristics for case logs from the American Board of Urology between 2004 and 2013. We used generalized estimating equations with a log link and negative binomial distribution to examine demographic differences (gender, rural location, and surgeon volume) in the number of vasectomies surgeons performed over time. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2013, 5316 urologists had case logs collected within the 7-month certification window. The majority of these surgeons self-identified as general urologists (82.8%), and a small proportion identified as andrology and infertility specialists (1.7%). Across all years, the median number of vasectomies performed per certifying surgeon during the study period was 14 (interquartile range 6-26). The majority of vasectomies were performed by high-volume surgeons (≥ 26 vasectomies) ranging from 49.2% to 66.9% annually, whereas the proportion performed by low-volume (≤ 5 vasectomies) surgeons ranged from 3.3% to 6.6% annually. Male surgeons performed vasectomies 2.20 times more frequently than female surgeons (95% confidence interval 1.93-2.49; P <.0001) across the study period with no evidence to suggest this gap changed over time (gender-year interaction 1.01 [95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.06; p = .576]). CONCLUSION: While the majority of urologists performing vasectomy identify as general urologists, there appears to be a focus on vasectomy practice among a small number of high-volume surgeons. Furthermore, while the number of female surgeons performing vasectomies increased, a gender gap persists in the proportion of vasectomies performed by females.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Cirujanos/tendencias , Urólogos/tendencias , Vasectomía/tendencias , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/tendencias , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 64: 101631, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760357

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: There are conflicting reports on the association of vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to evaluate the association between vasectomy and PCa from a nationwide cohort in Finland. MATERIALS & METHODS: Sterilization registry of Finland and the Finnish Cancer Registry data were utilized to identify all men who underwent vasectomy between years 1987-2014 in Finland. Standard incidence ratio (SIR) for PCa as well as all-cause standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 38,124 men with vasectomy with a total of 429,937 person-years follow-up data. The median age at vasectomy was 39.7 years (interquartile range [IQR] 35.9-44.0), after vasectomy PCa was diagnosed in 413 men (122 cases 0-10 years, 219 cases 10-20 years and 72 cases >20 years from vasectomy). SIR for PCa for the vasectomy cohort was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.04-1.27). By the end of follow-up, 19 men had died from PCa, while the expected number was 20.5 (SMR 0.93 [95%CI: 0.56-1.44]). The overall mortality was decreased (SMR 0.54 [95%CI: 0.51-0.58]) among men with vasectomy. CONCLUSION: We found a small statistically significant increase in PCa incidence after vasectomy, but in contrast the mortality of vasectomized men was significantly reduced. This may be due to higher likelihood of vasectomized men to undergo prostate-specific antigen testing, having healthier general lifestyle and other biological factors e.g. high reproductive fitness.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Vasectomía/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
13.
Asian J Androl ; 21(6): 540-543, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31044755

RESUMEN

Urologists perform the majority of vasectomies in the United States; however, family medicine physicians (FMPs) perform up to 35%. We hypothesized that differences exist in practice patterns and outcomes between urologists and FMPs. Patients who underwent a vasectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. Postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) practices were compared between urologists and FMPs, before and after release of the 2012 AUA vasectomy guidelines. From 2010 to 2016, FMPs performed 1435 (35.1%) of all vasectomies. PVSA follow-up rates were similar between the two groups (63.4% vs 64.8%, P = 0.18). Of the patients with follow-up, the median number of PVSAs obtained was 1 (range 1-6) in both groups (P = 0.22). Following the release of guidelines, fewer urologists obtained multiple PVSAs (69.8% vs 28.9% pre- and post-2012, P < 0.01). FMPs had a significant but lesser change in the use of multiple PVSAs (47.5% vs 38.4%, P < 0.01). Both groups made appropriate changes in the timing of the first PVSA, but FMPs continued to obtain PVSAs before 8 weeks (15.0% vs 6.5%, P < 0.01). FMPs had a higher rate of positive results in PVSAs obtained after 8 weeks, the earliest recommended by the AUA guidelines (4.1% vs 1.3%, P < 0.01). Significant differences in PVSA utilization between FMPs and urologists were identified and were impacted by the release of AUA guidelines in 2012. In summary, FMPs obtained multiple PVSAs more frequently and continued to obtain PVSAs prior to the 8-week recommendation, suggesting less penetration of AUA guidelines to nonurology specialties. Furthermore, FMPs had more positive results on PVSAs obtained within the recommended window.


Asunto(s)
Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Wisconsin
14.
MSMR ; 26(3): 11-19, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30912664

RESUMEN

During 2000-2017, a total of 170,878 active component service members underwent a first-occurring vasectomy, for a crude overall incidence rate of 8.6 cases per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs). The most common operative procedure performed was conventional vasectomy (99.2%), with less than 1% of vasectomies categorized as minimally invasive vasectomy. Among the men who underwent incident vasectomy, 2.2% had another vasectomy performed during the surveillance period. Compared to their respective counterparts, the overall rates of vasectomy were highest among service men aged 30-39 years, non-Hispanic whites, married men, and those in pilot/air crew occupations. Male Air Force members had the highest overall incidence of vasectomy and men in the Marine Corps, the lowest. Crude annual vasectomy rates among service men increased slightly between 2000 and 2017. The largest increases in rates over the 18-year period occurred among service men aged 35-49 years and among men working as pilots/air crew. Among those who underwent vasectomy, 1.8% also had at least 1 vasectomy reversal during the surveillance period. The likelihood of vasectomy reversal decreased with advancing age. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic service men were more likely than those of other race/ethnicity groups to undergo vasectomy reversals.


Asunto(s)
Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasovasostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Asian Journal of Andrology ; (6): 540-543, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-1009730

RESUMEN

Urologists perform the majority of vasectomies in the United States; however, family medicine physicians (FMPs) perform up to 35%. We hypothesized that differences exist in practice patterns and outcomes between urologists and FMPs. Patients who underwent a vasectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. Postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) practices were compared between urologists and FMPs, before and after release of the 2012 AUA vasectomy guidelines. From 2010 to 2016, FMPs performed 1435 (35.1%) of all vasectomies. PVSA follow-up rates were similar between the two groups (63.4% vs 64.8%, P = 0.18). Of the patients with follow-up, the median number of PVSAs obtained was 1 (range 1-6) in both groups (P = 0.22). Following the release of guidelines, fewer urologists obtained multiple PVSAs (69.8% vs 28.9% pre- and post-2012, P < 0.01). FMPs had a significant but lesser change in the use of multiple PVSAs (47.5% vs 38.4%, P < 0.01). Both groups made appropriate changes in the timing of the first PVSA, but FMPs continued to obtain PVSAs before 8 weeks (15.0% vs 6.5%, P < 0.01). FMPs had a higher rate of positive results in PVSAs obtained after 8 weeks, the earliest recommended by the AUA guidelines (4.1% vs 1.3%, P < 0.01). Significant differences in PVSA utilization between FMPs and urologists were identified and were impacted by the release of AUA guidelines in 2012. In summary, FMPs obtained multiple PVSAs more frequently and continued to obtain PVSAs prior to the 8-week recommendation, suggesting less penetration of AUA guidelines to nonurology specialties. Furthermore, FMPs had more positive results on PVSAs obtained within the recommended window.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Wisconsin
16.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0194606, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A number of researchers have reported that vasectomy is a risk factor for testicular cancer. However, this conclusion is inconsistent with a number of other published articles. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess whether vasectomy increases the risk of testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all related studies by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from January 01, 1980 to June 01, 2017. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to assess all included non-randomized studies. Summarized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the difference in outcomes between case and control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. RESULTS: A total of eight studies (2176 testicular cancer patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Six articles were case-control studies, and two were cohort studies. The pooled estimate of the OR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.30) based on the eight studies in a fixed effects model. Two subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. The results were consistent with the overall findings. Publication bias was detected by Begg's test and Egger's test and p values > 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that there was no association between vasectomy and the development of testicular cancer. More high-quality studies are warranted to further explore the association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiología , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Testiculares/etiología , Vasectomía/efectos adversos
17.
Urology ; 118: 76-79, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578040

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To use the Truven Health MarketScan database to better approximate the annual rate of vasectomies performed in the US population, to determine changes over time, regional differences, providers performing this, and to know if there is any monthly variation in vasectomy rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Claims data were evaluated from 2007 to 2015 to determine the annual prevalence of vasectomy by patient age and region in the United States. The cohort included men aged 18-64 years with at least 1 claim in any given year in Truven Health MarketScan. Provider type and place of service were evaluated in 2014 and 2015. Monthly evaluation of vasectomy prevalence compared with total claims was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of vasectomies decreased from 2007 to 2015, across all age groups and in all locations of the country (P <.001). Using these data and the most recent US census data, an estimated 527,476 vasectomies were performed in the United States in 2015. The North Central and West regions (0.64% and 0.60%, respectively) had the highest annual prevalence of vasectomies. The month of March and the end of the year had the highest proportion of vasectomies performed. In both 2014 and 2015, a urologist in the office setting performed 82% of vasectomies. CONCLUSION: An estimated 527,476 vasectomies were performed in the United States in 2015. From 2007 to 2015 there was a decrease in the proportion of vasectomies performed in all age groups and in all locations of the country. The end of the year and the month of March are when the most vasectomies are performed.


Asunto(s)
Vasectomía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Urología/métodos , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/tendencias
18.
J Biosoc Sci ; 50(4): 505-526, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28879818

RESUMEN

Tubal ligation is the modal form of family planning among American women aged 30 and older. As the preference for tubal ligation over cheaper, lower risk and more reliable methods, such as vasectomy, has puzzled experts, a theoretical approach that explains this preference would be useful. The present study investigates the high prevalence of voluntary sterilization among American women from the perspective of life history theory, arguing that the trade-offs between investing in current and future offspring will favour tubal ligation when women cannot obtain reliable male commitment to future parental investment. Data came from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers (NSFB), a nationally representative survey of 4712 American women aged 25-45 conducted between 2004 and 2007. Four novel predictions of the prevalence of tubal ligation, drawn from life history theory, were developed and tested: 1) it is most common among unpartnered women with children, and least common among married women with children; 2) it is negatively correlated with age at first birth; 3) it is least common among highly educated women without children, and most common among less educated women with children; and 4) among women with two or more children, it is positively correlated with lifetime number of long-term partners. These predictions were tested using multivariate regression analysis. The first prediction was not supported: women with children were more likely to be sterilized, regardless of their marital status. The other three predictions were all supported by the data. The results suggest that trade-offs influence women's decisions to undergo voluntary sterilization. Women are most likely to opt for tubal ligation when the costs of an additional child will impinge on their ability to invest in existing offspring, especially in the context of reduced male commitment.


Asunto(s)
Identidad de Género , Responsabilidad Parental , Esterilización Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Conducta de Elección , Correlación de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Prevalencia , Análisis de Regresión , Esterilización Tubaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Rev. argent. urol. (1990) ; 83(3): 109-114, 2018. ilus.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-986363

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Describir la experiencia de 6 años en la realización de vasectomías en el sector de Cirugía Menor Ambulatoria del Hospital Público Materno Infantil de Salta. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y cualitativo. Se analizaron las estadísticas de vasectomía desde julio de 2010 a abril de 2016, considerándose datos socioeconómicos. Resultados: Se efectuaron 187 vasectomías con técnica tradicional. El promedio de edad de hombres que se sometieron a vasectomía fue de 34,6 años. El preservativo fue el método anticonceptivo más utilizado previo a la realización de la vasectomía. La edad promedio de inicio de las relaciones sexuales fue de 16,4 años. La mayoría tenía hijos al momento de la vasectomía y se sintió muy satisfecho con los resultados. Conclusión: Consideramos la vasectomía un procedimiento seguro, efectivo y de baja morbilidad, pero que requiere seguir un protocolo(AU)


Objective: To describe the experience achieved after 6 years performing vasectomies in the Minor Ambulatory Surgery sector of the Hospital Público Materno Infantil de Salta. Materials and methods: Retrospective, descriptive and qualitative study. Vasectomy statistics were analyzed from July 2010 to April 2016 considering socioeconomic data. Results: 187 traditional vasectomies were performed. The average age of men who had vasectomy was 34.6. The condom was the most used contraceptive method before they had a vasectomy. The average age of onset of sexual intercourse was 16.4 years. Most had children at the time of vasectomy and felt very satisfied with the results. Conclusion: We consider vasectomy a safe, effective and of low morbidity procedure, though it requires to follow a protocol(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Vasectomía/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticoncepción/métodos
20.
NCHS Data Brief ; (284): 1-8, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29155680

RESUMEN

Contraception is used to help prevent unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STI). Higher percentages of pregnancies to unmarried persons are unintended than for those who are married (1). Patterns of contraceptive use as reported by women, including differences by marital status, are well documented using National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) data (2­4); however, less research focuses on contraceptive use as reported by men. Using 2011­2015 NSFG data from men, with selected time trends, this data brief describes contraceptive use at last recent vaginal sexual intercourse (within 3 months) among unmarried men, focusing primarily on male methods of contraception (condom, withdrawal, and vasectomy).


Asunto(s)
Coito , Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Civil/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Coito Interrumpido , Condones/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Raciales , Estados Unidos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...