Adrenal Vein Sampling: Tips and Tricks.

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the standard method for distinguishing unilateral from bilateral sources of autonomous aldosterone production in patients with primary aldosteronism. This procedure has been performed at limited specialized centers due to its technical complexity. With recent advances in imaging technology and knowledge of adrenal vein anatomy in parallel with the development of adjunctive techniques, AVS has become easier to perform, even at nonspecialized centers. Although rare, anatomic variants of the adrenal veins can cause sampling failure or misinterpretation of the sampling results. The inferior accessory hepatic vein and the inferior emissary vein are useful anatomic landmarks for right adrenal vein cannulation, which is the most difficult and crucial step in AVS. Meticulous assessment of adrenal vein anatomy on multidetector CT images and the use of a catheter suitable for the anatomy are crucial for adrenal vein cannulation. Adjunctive techniques such as intraprocedural cortisol assay, cone-beam CT, and coaxial guidewire-catheter techniques are useful tools to confirm right adrenal vein cannulation or to troubleshoot difficult blood sampling. Interventional radiologists should be involved in interpreting the sampling results because technical factors may affect the results. In rare instances, bilateral adrenal suppression, in which aldosterone-to-cortisol ratios of both adrenal glands are lower than that of the inferior vena cava, can be encountered. Repeat sampling may be necessary in this situation. Collaboration with endocrinology and laboratory medicine services is of great importance to optimize the quality of the samples and for smooth and successful operation. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Liver regeneration after portal and hepatic vein embolization improves overall survival compared with portal vein embolization alone: mid-term survival analysis of the multicentre DRAGON 0 cohort.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year overall survival after simultaneous portal (PVE) and hepatic vein (HVE) embolization versus PVE alone in patients undergoing liver resection for primary and secondary cancers of the liver. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, all DRAGON 0 centres provided 3-year follow-up data for all patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE, and were included in DRAGON 0 between 2016 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to assess 3-year overall and recurrence/progression-free survival. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 199 patients were included from 7 centres, of whom 39 underwent PVE/HVE and 160 PVE alone. Groups differed in median age (P = 0.008). As reported previously, PVE/HVE resulted in a significantly higher resection rate than PVE alone (92 versus 68%; P = 0.007). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PVE/HVE group (median survival not reached after 36 months versus 20 months after PVE; P = 0.004). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified PVE/HVE as an independent predictor of survival (univariable HR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.76; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Overall survival after PVE/HVE is substantially longer than that after PVE alone in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours.

Dorsal approach in laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy: A case series.

RATIONALE: The utility of the dorsal approach has been reported for laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: The aim of the present study is to show the usefulness of the dorsal approach for laparoscopic extended left-hemi-hepatectomy while ensuring safe identification of hepatic veins and dissection of the dorsal tumor margin. DIAGNOSES: Tumors requiring extended left hemi-hepatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: After mobilization of the lateral sector and division of the Arantius plate, parenchyma above the Arantius plate is removed to expose the root of the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein. Each of these veins can be isolated separately either intra- or extra-hepatically. After removing the parenchyma on the cranial side of the left Glissonean pedicle continuous with the exposed hepatic veins, the left Glissonean pedicle is isolated using the Glissonean pedicle transection method. After division of the left hepatic vein and Glissonean pedicle, segment 4 (in which the main part of the tumor is commonly located) is dissected from the anterior plane of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe by the dorsal approach, along with the hepatic hilum. Following dissection of the dorsal side of the tumor, and division of parenchyma from the anterior edge of the liver, the anterior Glissonean branches and middle hepatic vein are divided safely and the specimen is resected. OUTCOMES: Three patients underwent laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy, with no open conversions. Operative time and blood loss were 331 (concomitant with another partial hepatectomy), 277, and 315 minutes; and 200, 100, and 100 g, respectively. The postoperative courses were uneventful. LESSONS: The dorsal approach maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy and can be performed safely.

Combination of a Glissonean Approach and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging to Perform a Laparoscopic Right Anterior Sectionectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS) remains a technically demanding procedure as it requires two transection planes where the middle and right hepatic veins run; however, the main difficulty is locating these two planes1-3. The aim of this video was to show the technique of an LRAS performed with a transparenchymal glissonean pedicle approach and guided by indocyanine green (ICG) staining. METHODS: This was the case of an 80-year-old man with a history of hemochromatosis and normal liver function. He was diagnosed with a 6 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at segment 8, close to the right anterior pedicle. RESULTS: The technique consisted of parenchymal transection along the main portal fissure along the right border of the middle hepatic vein. Opening the liver facilitated access to the right anterior glissonean pedicle and selective transparenchymal clamping. A negative-stain ICG test permitted to demarcate the transection line along the right lateral portal fissure. The parenchymal transection was carried out in a caudal approach, along two perfectly marked planes, preserving the middle and right hepatic veins. The duration of the procedure was 200 min and blood loss was 300 mL. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the third postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Guidance during resection, and protection of the right posterior pedicle and right hepatic vein are the key points of the LRAS. The glissonean approach and the ICG imaging technology are of great help in resolving these difficulties.

Double hepatic vein reconstruction during extended anatomical resection of segment 8 for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic vein reconstruction (HVR) is occasionally necessary for resecting hepatic malignancies to ensure surgical margins while preserving remnant liver function [1]. Reports of multiple HVR are rare due to the highly technical demanding procedure and high risk of morbidity [2]. We introduce our procedure of double HVR for metastatic liver tumors invading the right hepatic vein (RHV) and middle hepatic vein (MHV). METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis in segment 8, invading RHV and MHV. Due to impaired liver function, extended right hemihepatectomy was unsuitable. Thus, extended anatomical resection of segment 8 with double HVR was performed. The liver was completely mobilized and the RHV and MHV were secured. After liver parenchyma dissection, the specimen was connected by RHV and MHV (Fig. 1). The MHV was dissected and reconstructed using a right superficial femoral vein graft while the RHV remained connected [3]. Reconstruction of the MHV was performed on the posterior wall of the proximal side, followed by the anterior wall, using 4-point supporting threads. Anastomosis was performed by the over-and-over suture method. On the distal side, two-point supporting threads were applied. After specimen removal, the RHV was resected and reconstructed in the same manner using a left internal jugular vein graft [4]. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14 with no signs of liver failure. Computed tomography performed six months after surgery revealed no graft occlusion (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, this technique may be a useful option for preserving the remnant liver function.

[Vascular reconstruction and transplantation technologies in liver surgery (part II)]. / Sosudistye rekonstruktsii i transplantatsionnye tekhnologii v khirurgii pecheni (chast' II).

OBJECTIVE: To systematize tactical and technical aspects of liver resections with reconstruction of afferent and efferent blood supply and/or inferior vena cava; to study postoperative outcomes in patients with focal liver lesions using transplantation technologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 413 patients with parasitic lesions, primary and secondary liver tumors involving great vessels (portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, right atrium). All ones underwent liver resections with vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as liver autotransplantation in vivo, ante situ (ex situ in vivo), extracorporeal liver resections with autotransplantation (ex vivo). RESULTS: We obtained satisfactory immediate results after liver resections using transplantation technologies. CONCLUSION: Transplantation technologies in liver surgery can significantly increase resectability of tumors and survival of patients. Transplantation technologies are an important new surgical strategy and necessary option in modern hepatic surgery.

Metallic Stents for Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation and their Therapeutic Effects.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is established as a standard therapy for end-stage liver disease; however, vessel reconstruction is more demanding due to the short length and small size of the available structures compared with deceased-donor whole liver transplantation. Interventional radiology (IR) has become the first-line treatment for vascular complications after LDLT. Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a life-threatening complication after LDLT. The aim of this study of 592 adult-to-adult LDLT cases was to investigate the safety and efficacy of stent implantation for HVOO after LDLT. METHODS: Records of patients who developed HVOO requiring any treatment were collected with special reference to the metallic stent implantation. There were 232 left-side grafts and 360 right-side grafts. Sixteen cases developed HVOO after LDLT with an incidence rate of 2.7%, 5 with a left liver graft (2%), and 11 with a right-side graft (3%). The IR was attempted for 14 cases; among those, 8 cases were treated by stent implantation. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the initial stent implantation was 100%. The pressure gradient at the stenotic site significantly improved from 12.2 (range, 10.9-20.4 cm H2O) to 3.9 cm H2O (range, 1.4-8.2 cm H2O; P = .03). The volume of the congested graft liver decreased significantly from 1448 (range, 788-2170 mL) to 1265 mL (range, 748-1665 mL; P = .01), and the serum albumin level improved significantly from 3.3 (range, 1.7-3.7 g/dL) to 3.7 g/dL (range, 2.9-4.1 g/dL; P = .02). No procedure-related complication was noted, and the long-term stent patency was 100%. CONCLUSION: Metallic stent implantation for stenotic venous anastomosis after LDLT is a safe and effective treatment.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Intrahepatic and anterior course of the inferior vena cava: CT image and 3D reconstruction of a rare anatomical variation.

The widespread use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing and screening abdominal conditions often reveals rare, asymptomatic anomalies. There is a wide range of documented congenital variations in the anatomy of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins. In this report, we detail an exceptionally unusual variant of the IVC that follows a frontward and intraliver course, terminating at the anterior section of the right atrium. To gain a deeper insight into this anomaly, we employed 3D reconstruction techniques using the software Slicer and Blender.

Preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: a feasibility study of nineteen patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. METHODS: Nineteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of the bone, liver, portal vein, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning area were reconstructed in the Mimics software. The virtual Rosch-Uchida liver access set and the VIATORR stent model were established in the 3D Max software. The puncture path from the hepatic vein to the portal vein and the release position of the stent were simulated in the Mimics and 3D Max software, respectively. The simulation results were exported to Photoshop software, and the 3D reconstructed top of the liver diaphragm was used as the registration point to fuse with the liver diaphragmatic surface of the intraoperative fluoroscopy image. The selected portal vein system fusion image was overlaid on the reference display screen to provide image guidance during the operation. As a control, the last 19 consecutive cases of portal vein puncture under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy were analyzed retrospectively, including the number of puncture attempts, puncture time, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and total exposure dose (dose area product). RESULTS: The average time of preoperative simulation was about 61.26 ± 6.98 minutes. The average time of intraoperative image fusion was 6.05 ± 1.13 minutes. The median number of puncture attempts was not significantly different between the study group (n = 3) and the control group (n = 3; P = 0.175). The mean puncture time in the study group (17.74 ± 12.78 min) was significantly lower than that in the control group (58.32 ± 47.11 min; P = 0.002). The mean total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different between the study group (26.63 ± 12.84 min) and the control group (40.00 ± 23.44 min; P = 0.083). The mean total procedure time was significantly lower in the study group (79.74 ± 37.39 min) compared with the control group (121.70 ± 62.24 min; P = 0.019). The dose area product of the study group (220.60 ± 128.4 Gy. cm2) was not significantly different from that of the control group (228.5 ± 137.3 Gy. cm2; P = 0.773). There were no image guidance-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion to guide a portal vein puncture is feasible, safe, and effective when creating a TIPS. The method is cheap and may improve portal vein puncture, which may be valuable for hospitals lacking intravascular ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) equipment equipped with a CT-angiography function.

Pediatric Hepatoblastoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Diagnostic Performance of MR in Staging POSTTEXT and Vascular Involvement.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of resectability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of hepatoblastoma is dependent on Post-Treatment EXTENT of Disease (POSTTEXT) staging and its annotation factors P (portal venous involvement) and V (hepatic venous/inferior vena cava [IVC] involvement), but MR performance in assessing them remains unclear. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for preoperative POSTTEXT staging and diagnosing vascular involvement in terms of annotation factors P and V in pediatric hepatoblastoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (17 males, median age, 24 months; age range, 6-98 months) with proven hepatoblastoma underwent preoperative MR imaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2WI with fat suppression, diffusion weighted imaging, radial stack-of-the-star/Cartesian 3D Dixon T1-weighted gradient echo imaging. ASSESSMENT: Three radiologists independently assessed the POSTTEXT stages and annotation factors P and V based on the 2017 PRE/POSTTEXT system. The sensitivities and specificities were calculated for 1) diagnosing each POSTTEXT stage; 2) discrimination of stages III and IV (advanced) from those stages I and II (non-advanced) hepatoblastomas; and 3) annotation factors P and V. The combination of pathologic findings and surgical records served as the reference standard. STATISTICAL TESTS: Sensitivity, specificity, Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity ranges for discriminating advanced from non-advanced hepatoblastomas were 73.3%-80.0% and 80.0%-90.0%, respectively. For annotation factor P, they were 66.7%-100.0% and 90.6%, respectively. For factor V, they were 75.0% and 67.7%-83.9%, respectively. There was excellent, substantial, and moderate agreement on POSTTEXT staging (Fleiss kappa = 0.82), factors P (Fleiss kappa = 0.64), and factors V (Fleiss kappa = 0.60), respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: MR POSTTEXT provides reliable discrimination between advanced and non-advanced tumors, and MR has moderate to excellent specificity at identifying portal venous and hepatic venous/IVC involvement. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Stenting of Inferior Right Hepatic Vein in a Patient with Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Case Report.

A Japanese man in his 20s was referred to our hospital with a two-month history of abdominal fullness and leg edema. Abdominal computed tomography revealing massive ascites and ostial blockage of the main hepatic veins, and angiographic evaluation demonstrating obstruction of the main hepatic veins yielded a diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Diuretic agents were prescribed for the ascites but failed to provide relief. The patient was referred to our department for further evaluation and treatment. Angiography showed ostial obstruction of the main hepatic veins, with most of the portal hepatic flow draining from an inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) into the inferior vena cava (IVC) thorough an intrahepatic portal venous and venovenous shunt. Access between the main hepatic veins and IVC was impossible, but cannulation between the IRHV and IVC was achieved. Because of the venovenous connection between the main hepatic vein and the IRHV, metallic stents were placed into two IRHVs to decrease congestion in the hepatic venous outflow. After stent placement followed by balloon expansion, the gradient pressure between the hepatic vein and IVC improved remarkably. The ascites and lower leg edema improved postoperatively, and long-term stent patency (6 years) was achieved.

Impact of the inferior vena cava morphology on fluid dynamics of the hepatic veins.

We reported previously that a large vertical interval between the hepatic segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium (RA), referred to as the IVC-RA gap, was associated with more intraoperative bleeding during hemi-hepatectomy. We conducted a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study to clarify the impact of fluid dynamics resulting from morphologic variations around the liver. The subjects were 10 patients/donors with a large IVC-RA gap and 10 patients/donors with a small IVC-RA gap. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the IVC and hepatic vessels were created from CT images for the CFD study. Median pressure in the middle hepatic vein was significantly higher in the large-gap group than in the small-gap group (P = 0.008). Differences in hepatic vein pressure caused by morphologic variation in the IVC might be one of the mechanisms of intraoperative bleeding from the hepatic veins.

Laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment II: left lateral section-flip up method to safely and effectively encircle the Glissonean branch and expose the left hepatic vein (with video).

Laparoscopic anatomical resection of liver segment II (S2 segmentectomy) using left lateral section-flip up method is introduced to safely and effectively encircle the Glissonean branch of segment II (G2) and to expose the left hepatic vein (LHV). The left lateral section is completely mobilized and then flipped up. After encircling and clamping the G2 root, indocyanine green is intravenously injected and the demarcation line is clearly confirmed by near infrared fluorescence imaging. After exposure of the LHV from the root to this intersegmental plane between segments II/III, residual parenchymal resection is performed using the clamp crushing method. There are two difficulties concerning S2 segmentectomy. The first is encirclement of the G2 root without interfering with the G3. Compared with the conventional front view of the umbilical portion, the view behind the left lateral section contribute to easy confirmation and direct encircle of the G2 root without dividing the G3 and injuring LHV on the same plane. The second difficulty is that the boundary of the visible liver surface between segments II/III does not match the direction of the LHV. This can cause confusion to the operator aiming to perform precise inner parenchymal resection. Our procedure allows easy access to the LHV root and exposure of the peripheral directing hepatic vein. Hepatic vein-guided approaches will likely be helpful in precise performance of inner parts of liver resection.