Emotional Blunting in Depression in the PREDDICT Clinical Trial: Inflammation-Stratified Augmentation of Vortioxetine With Celecoxib.

BACKGROUND: Emotional symptoms are recognized as a key feature in individuals with major depressive disorder. Previously, emotional blunting has been described both as a side effect of antidepressant treatment and as a symptom of depression. Little is known about the change of emotional blunting during antidepressant treatment. METHODS: The PREDDICT trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-week trial on the augmentation of vortioxetine with the anti-inflammatory agent celecoxib or placebo. Presently we report on exploratory secondary outcomes of changes in emotional blunting in depression assessed with the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) total score and subscores from baseline to 8-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up assessments. RESULTS: In the whole group, there was a significant improvement in the ODQ total score and all subscores after 8 weeks. After stratification of participants into the treatment groups, the ODQ total score as well as subscores related to emotional blunting as a symptom of depression (reduction in positive emotions, not caring) improved between baseline and all follow-up time points in both treatment groups. Changes in subscores considered as a side effect of antidepressants (general reduction in emotions, emotional detachment) were inconclusive in both treatment groups. Overall, the placebo-augmented group showed slightly better results in changes of emotional blunting scores than the celecoxib group as did those with elevated inflammation at screening, regardless of treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests favorable effects of vortioxetine on emotional blunting in both short- and long-term course. The beneficial impact of vortioxetine on emotional blunting was weaker in celecoxib-augmented patients compared with placebo, possibly due to pharmacokinetic interactions. Clinical Trials Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p.

Perspectives on the impact of vortioxetine on the treatment armamentarium of major depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a mental health issue that significantly affects patients' quality of life and functioning. Despite available treatments, many patients continue to suffer due to incomplete symptom resolution and side effects. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript examines Vortioxetine's role in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) treatment, highlighting its potential to reshape therapeutic strategies due to its unique Multimodal action and proven broad-spectrum efficacy in multiple depressive domains. A detailed examination of Vortioxetine's pharmacological aspects, including indications, dosage, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics, is provided, emphasizing its safety and effectiveness. The discussion extends to Vortioxetine's role in acute-phase treatment and maintenance of MDD and its profound impact on specialized depression domains. EXPERT OPINION: Vortioxetine is distinguished for its novel multimodal serotonin modulation mechanism, showcasing significant promise as an innovative treatment for MDD. Its efficacy, which is dose-dependent, along with a commendable tolerability profile, positions it as a potential leading option for initial treatment strategies. The discourse on dosage titration, particularly the strategy of initiating treatment at lower doses followed by gradual escalation, underscores the approach toward minimizing initial adverse effects while optimizing therapeutic outcomes, aligning with the principles of personalized medicine in psychiatric care.

Repercusión de vortioxetina sobre la función sexual frente a otros antidepresivos / Impact of vortioxetine on sexual function compared to other antidepressants

Objetivo Analizar la repercusión del antidepresivo vortioxetina sobre la función sexual, frente a inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina (ISRS) e inhibidores selectivos mixtos de la recaptación de serotonina y noradrenalina (IRSN o Duales) en pacientes con depresión. Material y métodos Estudio analítico, observacional, longitudinal y prospectivo en el que se incluyeron hombres y mujeres mayores de 18años con trastorno depresivo y actividad sexual en pareja, separándolos en dos grupos: 1)de estudio: inician tratamiento con vortioxetina; 2)control: mantienen tratamiento con ISRS o Duales. Se realizaron tres visitas: inclusión, seguimiento a las 4semanas y final 3meses desde la inclusión. El periodo total de seguimiento fue de 3meses. Resultados Se incluyeron 87 pacientes (edad media, 46,85años). Al final del estudio se hallaron diferencias significativas (DS) en el valor medio de la suma de las puntuaciones de los dominios evaluadores de la respuesta sexual del cuestionario de Función Sexual de la Mujer (FSM-2) entre el grupo de estudio y el de control (22,42±4,39 y 16,13±7,76, respectivamente), con menor riesgo de disfunción sexual en las mujeres tratadas con vortioxetina. También menor riesgo de disfunción sexual en estas mismas mujeres en los dominios de deseo, lubricación, orgasmo, frecuencia sexual y satisfacción sexual. Estas diferencias no se hallaron al evaluar la función sexual masculina. Conclusiones Las mujeres tratadas con vortioxetina presentaron mejor función sexual que las tratadas con ISRS o Duales y menor riesgo de disfunción sexual (AU)

Objective To analyze the impact of the antidepressant vortioxetine on sexual function, compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and mixed selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (IRSN or Dual) in patients with depression. Material and methods Analytical, observational, longitudinal and prospective study, which included men and women over 18years of age, with depressive disorder and sexual activity with a partner, separating them into two groups: (i)study, starting treatment with vortioxetine; (2)control, maintaining treatment with SSRIs or Duals. Three visits were made: inclusion, follow-up at 4weeks and final 3months from inclusion. The total follow-up period was 3months. Results A total of 87 patients were included (mean age 46.85years). At the end of the study, significant differences (SD) were found in the mean value of the sum of the scores of the evaluative domains of the sexual response of the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire (FSM-2) between the study group and the control (22.42±4.39 and 16.13±7.76, respectively), with a lower risk of sexual dysfunction in women treated with vortioxetine. Also, lower risk of sexual dysfunction in these same women in the domains of desire, lubrication, orgasm, sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. These differences were not found when assessing male sexual function. Conclusions Women treated with vortioxetine presented better sexual function than those treated with SSRIs or Duals and a lower risk of sexual dysfunction (AU)

[Impact of vortioxetine on sexual function compared to other antidepressants]. / Repercusión de vortioxetina sobre la función sexual frente a otros antidepresivos.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the antidepressant vortioxetine on sexual function, compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and mixed selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (IRSN or Dual) in patients with depression. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analytical, observational, longitudinal and prospective study, which included men and women over 18years of age, with depressive disorder and sexual activity with a partner, separating them into two groups: (i)study, starting treatment with vortioxetine; (2)control, maintaining treatment with SSRIs or Duals. Three visits were made: inclusion, follow-up at 4weeks and final 3months from inclusion. The total follow-up period was 3months. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included (mean age 46.85years). At the end of the study, significant differences (SD) were found in the mean value of the sum of the scores of the evaluative domains of the sexual response of the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire (FSM-2) between the study group and the control (22.42±4.39 and 16.13±7.76, respectively), with a lower risk of sexual dysfunction in women treated with vortioxetine. Also, lower risk of sexual dysfunction in these same women in the domains of desire, lubrication, orgasm, sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. These differences were not found when assessing male sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with vortioxetine presented better sexual function than those treated with SSRIs or Duals and a lower risk of sexual dysfunction.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia-like syndrome post-initiation of vortioxetine.

A man in his mid-30s presented to the emergency department with a 1-week history of fatigue, loss of appetite, fever and productive (yellow) cough. This progressed to requiring admission to intensive care needing a oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. He had recently started vortioxetine for major depressive disorder, and his acute symptoms correlated with an increase in the dose of vortioxetine. For more than 20 years, rare but consistent reports of serotonergic medications have been implicated in eosinophilic pulmonary conditions. During this same period, serotonergic medications have become a mainstay solution for a wide range of depressive symptoms and disorders. This is the first report of an eosinophilic pneumonia-like syndrome occurring while consuming the novel serotonergic medication vortioxetine.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and burdensome condition. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of vortioxetine in treating MDD based on real-world data. METHODS: A systematic search of 8 electronic databases was performed from inception until October 2022 to identify real-world studies, excluding randomized controlled trials. We conducted subgroup, meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, publication bias, and quality assessments using the random-effects model. The effects were summarized by rates or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Of the 870 records identified, 11 studies (3139 participants) and 10 case reports or series were eligible for inclusion. Vortioxetine significantly relieved depression symptoms as assessed by both patients (SMD = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.60-2.89) and physicians (SMD = 3.73, 95% CI = 2.78-4.69). Cognitive function (SMD =1.86, 95% CI = 1.11-2.62) and functional disability (SMD =1.71, 95% CI = 1.14-2.29) were similarly markedly improved. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that geographic location and medication regimen (whether combined with other antidepressants) were crucial factors influencing effectiveness (in terms of depression severity and cognitive function), potentially contributing to significant heterogeneity. The estimated response and remission rates were 66.4% (95% CI = 51.2%-81.5%) and 58.0% (95% CI = 48.9%-67.1%), respectively. Vortioxetine was well tolerated, with a pooled dropout rate of 3.5% (95% CI = 1.8%-5.8%), and the most common adverse event was nausea, with an estimated rate of 8.9% (95% CI = 3.8%-15.8%). LIMITATIONS: The study has some limitations, including significant heterogeneity and limited evidence for some outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine is effective, well tolerated, and safe for treating MDD in clinical practice, with significant improvements observed in depressive severity, cognitive function, and functioning. Future studies should directly compare vortioxetine with other antidepressants in real-world settings to further evaluate its clinical utility.

The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI): Analysis of the clinically relevant response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder and emotional blunting using data from the COMPLETE study.

BACKGROUND: The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI) is a patient-reported scale for assessment of the impact of mental/cognitive energy, social motivation, and physical energy on daily functioning in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This analysis was undertaken to establish the clinically relevant response threshold for the MEI in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant treatment. METHODS: Patients with MDD experiencing inadequate response and emotional blunting on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor monotherapy (adequate dose for ≥6 weeks) were switched to vortioxetine 10-20 mg/day for 8 weeks. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in MEI total score. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment, mean (standard deviation) change in MEI total score from baseline was 33.0 (27.3) points. At week 8, mean change in MEI total score from baseline was 37.5 (27.8) points in patients no longer reporting emotional blunting and 28.3 (26.2) points in those still experiencing emotional blunting. In patients considered minimally improved (i.e. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] score of 3 after 8 weeks of vortioxetine), mean change in MEI total score from baseline was 14.7 (19.1) points. In patients defined as responders (CGI-I score of 2 at 8 weeks), mean change in MEI total score was 33.0 (24.7) points. LIMITATIONS: Short study duration. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide further validation of the clinical utility of the MEI for assessing treatment response in patients with MDD. The suggested MCID for MEI total score is 15 points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03835715.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and co-morbid generalized anxiety disorder in routine clinical practice: A subgroup analysis of the RELIEVE study.

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is commonly co-morbid with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is associated with greater functional impairment and poorer treatment outcomes than MDD alone. However, studies on treatment with drugs for depression in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD are limited. AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of vortioxetine treatment in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD in a subgroup analysis of the real-world RELIEVE study. METHODS: The analysis included outpatients diagnosed with MDD and co-morbid GAD who initiated vortioxetine treatment at their physician's discretion in the 24-week, observational RELIEVE study. Primary outcome was patient functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)) after 12 and 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment; secondary outcomes included depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)), cognitive symptoms (5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D-5)) and cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)). RESULTS: Overall, 180 patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD were included in the analysis. Following vortioxetine initiation, clinically significant improvements in patient functioning (SDS total score) were observed at week 12 (least-squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline, 7.5 points), sustained through week 24 (9.2 points) (both p < 0.0001). LS mean PHQ-9, PDQ-D-5 and DSST scores improved by 7.9, 4.8 and 7.4 points at week 24, respectively (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline). Adverse events were reported by 33.9% of patients (most commonly nausea, 13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, vortioxetine was associated with clinically meaningful, sustained improvements in functioning, and depressive and cognitive symptoms, in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NAME AND IDENTIFIER: Real-life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Depression (RELIEVE) (NCT03555136) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555136.

Vortioxetine 20 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: updated analysis of efficacy, safety, and optimal timing of dose adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 20 mg/day, and optimal timing of dose adjustment, in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Pooled analysis of six randomized, fixed-dose studies of vortioxetine 5 to 20 mg/day. Mean change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was analyzed by vortioxetine dose using a mixed model for repeated measures. Tolerability was assessed over the 8-week treatment period and from day 8 (ie, following dose increase to 20 mg/day). Data from three randomized, flexible-dose studies were examined for frequency and timing of dose adjustment. RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship for vortioxetine was confirmed in terms of improvement in MADRS total score. Significant differences vs placebo were seen for vortioxetine 20 mg/day from week 2 onwards; vortioxetine 10 mg did not separate from placebo until week 4. At week 8, mean change in MADRS total score from baseline was significantly greater for vortioxetine 20 mg/day vs 10 mg/day (difference, -1.03 points; P < .05). Incidence of adverse events was not increased in patients who received vortioxetine 20 mg/day vs 10 mg/day. In flexible-dose studies, dosage was increased to 20 mg/day after 1 week in 48.0% of patients; final dosage was 20 mg/day in 64.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine 20 mg is significantly more effective than vortioxetine 10 mg in patients with MDD, with a similar tolerability profile. In flexible-dose studies, almost half of all patients received 20 mg/day after 1 week and two-thirds received 20 mg/day as their final dosage.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Supratherapeutic Dosing of Vortioxetine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine at supratherapeutic dosages in patients with treatment-resistant depression.Methods: A retrospective observational naturalistic study was conducted in 56 depressed patients resistant to standard care treatment from September 2020 to April 2021. Effectiveness of the vortioxetine treatments was evaluated through Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) score, comparing CGI values at the beginning (T0) of the vortioxetine treatment with CGI values at the earliest of these 2 time points (T1): (1) 8 weeks of treatment with supratherapeutic dosages and (2) day of vortioxetine discontinuation or daily dosage reduction to ≤ 20 mg due to side effects. The tolerability and safe of vortioxetine were also monitored.Results: Fifty-six patients (32 females and 24 males, mean ± SD age of 51.1 ± 9.3 years) were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients received vortioxetine 30 mg/d, while 19 patients were treated with a 40-mg/d dosage. CGI scores significantly decreased (P < .001) in patients treated with 30 mg/d and 40 mg/d, respectively. No severe side effects were reported. Weight gain and nausea were the most common reported side effects. Nausea and limited efficacy were recorded as the most frequent reasons for vortioxetine dose reduction. None of the patients required vortioxetine discontinuation.Conclusions: Supratherapeutic doses of vortioxetine were relatively well-tolerated and effective in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in treatment of patients with major depressive disorder and common co-morbid physical illness.

BACKGROUND: The multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine is effective in reducing somatic symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but little is known about its effects in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with common comorbid physical illnesses. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of 13 randomized, placebo-controlled trials which evaluated the efficacy (using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and safety of vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day) in adult patients with MDD. We evaluated stable somatic comorbid conditions that were verified by a diagnosis and had sufficient database representation. RESULTS: Of the 5982 patients included in the database, 963 (16.1%) patients had a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, 152 (2.5%) had diabetes mellitus and 26 (0.4%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). At Week 8, adjusted mean[95%CI] treatment differences (vortioxetine vs. placebo) on MADRS total scores were -2.7[-4.2, -1.3] (p = 0.0002) points for the cardiovascular disease, -4.0[-7.7, -0.4] (p = 0.03) for the diabetes, and -6.2[-21.3, 8.9] (p = 0.36) for the COPD groups. The rate and pattern of adverse events were similar across the sub-groups with comorbidities and was consistent with that expected for vortioxetine treatment. LIMITATIONS: The primary studies were not designed to investigate the relationship between vortioxetine and comorbidities, nor were the post hoc analyses powered to detect group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD and comorbid cardiovascular disease or diabetes respond to vortioxetine in a similar way to the broader MDD population. Vortioxetine was generally safe and well tolerated and without unexpected adverse events in these subpopulations, most of whom are taking multiple concomitant medications.

Differential Response to Three Antidepressants in Patients with Major Depressive Episode Who Suffered Covid-19-Related Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Covid 19 pandemic might have impacted response to drug treatment in major depressive episode (MDE). We compared responses to three different antidepressant drugs, i.e., vortioxetine, sertraline, and trazodone, in outpatients with MDE during Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD), or schizophrenia and related psychoses (SSOPDs) during two time periods, i.e., before and after suffering Covid-19-related trauma. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on clinically stabilised for at least 6 months outpatients with MDE during the course of MDD (N=58), BD (N=33), or SSOPDs (N=51). Patients, whose baseline assessments of Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Visual Analogue Scale for Craving (VAS-crav) and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) were available, were recruited at the time they suffered Covid-19-related traumas. Fifty patients, prior to the pandemic, when they were clinically stable, were treated with 15 mg/die vortioxetine, 44 with 450 mg/die trazodone, and 48 with 150 mg/die sertraline. After experiencing a major Covid-19-related personal trauma, patients showed clinical worsening which required dosage adjustment (20 mg/day vortioxetine; 600 mg/day trazodone, and 200 mg/day sertraline) and, for some of them, hospitalisation. Scores on the MADRS, Ham-A, BPRS, VAS-crav and WHOQOL-BREF were compared drug-wise and genderwise with Student's t test for continuous variables and Χ2 for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 142 outpatients (age, mean 39.63 ± 16.84; 70 men and 72 women); women were older than men (mean age 43.18 ± 17.61 vs. 35.98 ± 15.30; p=0.01). The two genders did not differ on other variables. For all treatments, worsening symptoms were observed at the time of trauma, followed by slow recovery with treatment readjustment. Trauma-related worsening in patients on vortioxetine was less intense than patients on the other two antidepressants and recovery was faster. All drugs were associated with an improvement in QoL. The vortioxetine group showed a lower hospitalisation rate (24%) than sertraline (35.4%) and trazodone (38.6%), but this was not significant (p=0.27). CONCLUSION: All drugs improved symptoms of Covid-19 trauma in patients with MDE, with vortioxetine showing a small advantage. No differences between vortioxetine, sertraline and trazodone were found as concerning the need for hospitalisation.

Vortioxetine 5, 10, and 20 mg significantly reduces the risk of relapse compared with placebo in patients with remitted major depressive disorder: The RESET study.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) is typically recommended at the dose on which the patient was stabilized. However, for some patients, dose alteration may be required. We investigated multiple vortioxetine doses versus placebo for relapse prevention in patients achieving remission with vortioxetine 10 mg daily. METHODS: In this US-based, randomized withdrawal study, outpatients (N = 1106, aged 18-75 years) with recurrent MDD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≥26), a current major depressive episode (MDE) (8 weeks-18 months' duration), and ≥2 previous MDEs were treated with open-label vortioxetine 10 mg once daily orally for 16 weeks. Responders at week 8 (≥50% MADRS score reduction) achieving remission (MADRS score ≤12) at weeks 14 and 16 (N = 580) were randomized to vortioxetine 5, 10, or 20 mg or placebo in a 32-week double-blind period. The primary outcome was time to first relapse over the first 28 weeks; secondary outcomes (relapse, change in total MADRS, Clinician Global Impression-Severity [CGI-S]) were evaluated at 32 weeks. RESULTS: Time to relapse was longer and cumulative relapse rates were lower for vortioxetine 5 mg (19.3%), 10 mg (17.9%), and 20 mg (17.4%) versus placebo (32.5%) over 28 weeks (p<0.05 for all). CGI-S scores remained stable and adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate. LIMITATIONS: Extrapolation of results to patients achieving remission with vortioxetine doses other than 10 mg should be made with caution. CONCLUSION: For patients with MDD achieving symptomatic remission at 10 mg/day, all doses of vortioxetine were effective for relapse prevention, with acceptable tolerability.

Post-Marketing Safety Profile of Vortioxetine Using a Cluster Analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis of Global Adverse Event Reports.

INTRODUCTION: Vortioxetine, a multimodal serotonergic drug, is widely used as treatment for major depressive disorder. Although on the market since late 2013, the data of the relative safety of vortioxetine, especially compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are still scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the adverse event reporting pattern of vortioxetine through a cluster analysis. Furthermore, to compare the adverse event reporting pattern for vortioxetine with that of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. METHODS: Individual case safety reports for vortioxetine in VigiBase up to 1 November, 2019 were subjected to consensus clustering, to identify and describe natural groupings of reports based on their reported adverse events. A vigiPoint exploratory analysis compared vortioxetine to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in terms of relative frequencies for a wide range of covariates, including patient sex and age, reported drugs and adverse events, and reporting country. Important differences were identified using odds ratios with adaptive statistical shrinkage. RESULTS: Thirty-six clusters containing at least five reports were identified and analysed. The two largest clusters included 48% of the vortioxetine reports and appeared to represent gastrointestinal adverse events and hypersensitivity adverse events. Other distinct clusters were related to, respectively, fatigue, aggression/suicidality, convulsion, medication errors, arthralgia/myalgia, increased weight, paraesthesia and anticholinergic effects. Some of these clusters are not labelled for vortioxetine, such as arthralgia/myalgia and paraesthesia, but are known adverse events for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. A vigiPoint analysis revealed a higher proportion of reports from consumers and non-health professionals for vortioxetine as well as higher relative reporting rates of gastrointestinal symptoms, pruritus and mood-related symptoms, consistent with the cluster analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A pattern of co-reported adverse events that is consistent with labelled adverse events for vortioxetine and the safety profile for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general was revealed. Clusters of unlabelled adverse events were identified that reflect clinical entities that might represent signals of previously unknown adverse events. More extensive analyses of spontaneous reports may help to further understand the reporting pattern of adverse events.

Vortioxetine as an analgesic in preclinical inflammatory pain models: Mechanism of action.

Vortioxetine is a novel atypical antidepressant with multimodal activity that has recently demonstrated efficacy against neuropathic pain. There is no published data about its analgesic properties in models characterized by peripheral inflammation and consequent pain pathway sensitization, nor data on its mechanism of antinociceptive action. This study aimed to investigate vortioxetine's antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic effects in trigeminal, visceral, and somatic inflammatory pain models, and provide evidence on its mechanism of action in the modulation of trigeminal nociception. Vortioxetine's effects on the nociceptive behavior in orofacial formalin test (OFT) and acetic acid-writhing test in mice and on mechanical hyperalgesia in carrageenan-induced paw inflammation in rats were examined following peroral single administration. The involvement of serotonergic/adrenergic/cholinergic/cannabinoid/adenosine receptors was evaluated in OFT by intraperitoneally treating mice with an appropriate antagonist immediately after vortioxetine application. We used antagonists of 5-HT1B/1D serotonergic (GR 127935), α1 -adrenergic (prazosin), α2 -adrenergic (yohimbine), ß1 -adrenergic (metoprolol), muscarinic (atropine), α7 nicotinic (methyllycaconitine), CB1 /CB2 cannabinoid (AM251 and AM630), and adenosine A1 (DPCPX) receptors. Vortioxetine dose-dependently reduced pain behavior in OFT and acetic acid writhing test, as well as inflammatory hyperalgesia in paw pressure test. All examined antagonists except prazosin dose-dependently inhibited vortioxetine's antinociceptive effects. In conclusion, vortioxetine exerted analgesic efficacy in trigeminal, visceral, and somatic inflammatory pain. The effect is at least in part mediated by 5-HT1B/1D serotonergic, α2 /ß1 -adrenergic, muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic, CB1 /CB2 cannabinoid, and adenosine A1 receptors. These findings contribute to better understanding of the analgesic effect of vortioxetine and suggest its potential usefulness for inflammatory pain treatment.

Vortioxetine in major depressive disorder: from mechanisms of action to clinical studies. An updated review.

INTRODUCTION: Vortioxetine is a multimodal-acting antidepressant that provides improvements on cognitive function aside from antidepressants and anxiolytic effects. Vortioxetine has been found to be one of the most effective and best tolerated options for major depressive disorder (MDD) in head-to-head trials. AREAS COVERED: The present review intends to gather the most relevant and pragmatic data of vortioxetine in MDD, specially focusing on new studies that emerged between 2015 and 2020. EXPERT OPINION: Vortioxetine is the first antidepressant that has shown improvements both in depression and cognitive symptoms, due to the unique multimodal mechanism of action that combine the 5-HT reuptake inhibition with modulations of other key pre- and post-synaptic 5-HT receptors (agonism of 5-HT1A receptor, partial agonism of 5-HT1B receptor, and antagonism of 5-HT3, 5-HT1D and 5-HT7 receptors). This new mechanism of action can explain the dose-dependent effect and can be responsible for its effects on cognitive functioning and improved tolerability profile. Potential analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties observed in preclinical studies as well as interesting efficacy and tolerability results of clinical studies with specific target groups render it a promising therapeutic option for patients with MDD and concomitant conditions (as menopause symptoms, pain, inflammation, apathy, sleep and/or metabolic abnormalities).

Improved cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder after treatment with vortioxetine: A EEG study.

INTRODUCTION: Vortioxetine has a positive effect on cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to examine the changes in cognitive function and EEG (spectral power and mismatch negativity (MMN)) in patients with MDD pre- and postvortioxetine treatment. METHODS: Thirty patients with MDD were included in the study. They were given vortioxetine (10-20mg po per day) for eight weeks. Depression and anxiety severities, social function (Korean version of the social adjustment scale (K-SAS)), and cognitive function (digit-symbol substitution Test (DSST), Korean version of the attentional control questionnaire (K-ACQ), and Korean version of the perceived deficits questionnaire for depression (K-PDQD)) were evaluated. Spectral power of EEG and MMN was also measured pre- and postvortioxetine treatment. RESULTS: Depression and anxiety severity, social function, and cognitive functioning significantly improved after vortioxetine treatment. Also, there was a significant decrease in the right central delta band and an increase in the right central beta 2 band following vortioxetine treatment. The changes in EEG spectral power were not related to changes in cognitive functions. Baseline MMN significantly predicted changes in DSST score after controlling for the baseline clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine treatment improved cognitive function and induced changes in EEG (decreased theta power and increased beta power) in patients with MDD. Our results suggest that greater negative MMN amplitude is associated with greater potential for cognitive improvement following vortioxetine treatment.

No evidence for clinical efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib with vortioxetine in the treatment of depression: A 6-week double-blind placebo controlled randomized trial.

Given the role of low-grade inflammation in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), anti-inflammatory strategies may improve treatment outcomes in some patients. However, it is controversial whether they can be used as adjunctive treatments and whether pre-treatment levels of inflammation can predict treatment outcomes. This study was conducted to measure the efficacy of anti-inflammatory augmentation of antidepressant treatment in MDD patients; and to investigate whether treatment response was dependent on baseline inflammation levels. This parallel-group randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the University of Adelaide (Australia). Participants with MDD were randomised to receive vortioxetine with celecoxib or vortioxetine with placebo for six weeks, and baseline blood high sensitivity C reactive protein levels were measured. Primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) and secondary outcomes included change in cognition (THINC-integrated tool - Codebreaker task) and functioning (Functioning Assessment Short Test) over 6 weeks. There was no evidence of superior efficacy of celecoxib augmentation over placebo on depressive symptom severity, response and remission rates, cognition and psychosocial functioning. There was also no evidence that pre-treatment inflammation levels modified the effect of celecoxib augmentation versus placebo. This observed lack of efficacy of celecoxib add-on does not support the use of celecoxib augmentation of antidepressants in the treatment of MDD in a cohort that mostly comprises treatment-resistant individuals. Additionally, C-reactive protein may not be suitable to predict treatment selection and response in MDD. The study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000527369 (www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p).