Intravenous delivery of furosemide using lipid-based versus polymer-based nanocapsules: in vitro and in vivo studies.

OBJECTIVES: Furosemide (FSM), a potent loop diuretic, is used to treat edema due to hypertension, congestive heart failure, and liver and renal failures. FSM applications are limited by its low bioavailability. Our aim is to use different nanoencapsulation strategies to control the release of FSM and enhance its pharmacokinetic properties. METHODS: Two types of FSM-loaded nanocapsules, namely FSM-loaded lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) and polymeric nanocapsules (PNCs), were developed, physicochemically characterized, and subjected to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. Lipid nanocapsules were prepared by the simple phase inversion method using LabrafacTM lipid, while the polymeric nanocapsules were prepared by nanoprecipitation method using polycaprolactone polymer. RESULTS: Transmission electron microscopy ascertains spherical structures, corroborating the nanometric diameter of both types of nanocapsules. The particle size of the optimized FSM-loaded LNCs and FSM-loaded PNCs was 32.19 ± 0.72 nm and 230.7 ± 5.13 nm, respectively. The percent entrapment efficiency was 63.56 ± 1.40% of FSM for the optimized PNCs. The in vitro release study indicated prolonged drug release compared to drug solutions. The two loaded nanocapsules systems succeeded in enhancing the pharmacokinetic parameters in comparison to the marketed FSM solution with superior diuretic activity (p < 0.05). The results of the stability study and the terminal sterilization by autoclave indicated the superiority of LNCs over PNCs in maintaining the physical parameters under storage conditions and the drastic conditions of sterilization. CONCLUSIONS: LNCs and PNCs are considered promising nanosysems for improving the diuretic effect of FSM.

Drug Consumption and Hydration Status: Analysis of the Associations in an Elder Population.

Hydration status plays a key role in healthy ageing, and it is potentially affected by several factors, including drug consumption. However, research on this issue to date is scarce, especially in highly vulnerable groups, such as the elderly. We aimed to study the relationship linking hydration status, analysed by means of a validated questionnaire, 24 h urine analysis, body composition assessment, and drug consumption in a sample of old adults. A total of 144 elders were included in the study. Cardiovascular drug consumption was significantly associated with a lower water intake in men (ß = -0.282, p = 0.029). Moreover, urinary analysis revealed that total drug intake as well as the consumption of diuretics and cardiovascular drugs were associated with poorer hydration status, whereas genito-urinary drugs were associated with an opposite effect, and these results were confirmed in terms of body composition. Hence, total drug consumption (ß = -0.205), diuretic (ß = -0.408), cardiovascular (ß = -0.297), and genito-urinary drugs (ß = 0.298) were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with total body water. The obtained results confirmed the impact of chronic treatment with certain drugs on hydration status. Nutritional interventions may be of great interest in certain population groups in order to prevent complications due to altered hydration status.

Glucocorticoid-induced acute diuresis in rats in relation to the reduced renal expression of sodium-dependent cotransporter genes.

Although several studies have shown that glucocorticoids exert diuretic effects in animals and humans, the underlying mechanism responsible for the acute diuretic effect remains obscure. Here we examined the mechanism in terms of gene-expression. We observed that glucocorticoids, including dexamethasone (Dex) and prednisolone (PSL), acutely induced diuresis in rats in a dose-dependent manner. Free water clearance values were negative after Dex or PSL treatment, similar to those observed after treatment with osmotic diuretics (furosemide and acetazolamide). Dex significantly increased the urinary excretion of sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, and inorganic phosphorus. Renal microarray analysis revealed that Dex significantly altered the renal expression of genes related to transmembrane transport activity. The mRNA levels of sodium/phosphate (NaPi-2a/Slc34a1, NaPi-2b/Slc34a2, and NaPi-2c/Slc34a3) and sodium/glucose cotransporters (Sglt2/Slc5a2) were significantly reduced in the Dex-treated kidney, being negatively correlated with the urinary excretion of their corresponding solutes. Dex did not affect renal expression of the natriuretic peptide receptor 1 (Npr1) gene, or the expression, localization, and phosphorylation of aquaporin-2 (AQP2), a water channel protein. These findings suggest that the acute diuretic effects of glucocorticoids might be mediated by reduced expression of sodium-dependent cotransporter genes.

Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study.

BACKGROUND: Single-pill combination (SPC) of three antihypertensive drugs has been shown to improve adherence to therapy compared with free combinations, but little is known about its long-term costs and health consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness profile of a three-drug SPC of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker, and a diuretic vs the corresponding two-pill administration (a two-drug SPC plus a third drug separately) from the Italian payer perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using multi-state semi-Markov modeling and microsimulation. Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), 30,172 and 65,817 patients aged ≥ 40 years who initiated SPC and two-pill combination, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 were identified. The observation period extended from the date of the first drug dispensation until death, emigration, or December 31, 2019. Disease and cost models were parametrized using the study cohort, and a lifetime microsimulation was applied to project costs and life expectancy for the compared strategies, assigning each of them to each cohort member. Costs and life-years gained were discounted by 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1,000 samples was performed to address parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with the two-pill combination, the SPC increased life expectancy by 0.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.14), with a mean cost differential of -€12 (95% CI -9,719-8,131), making it the dominant strategy (ICER = -14, 95% CI -€15,871-€7,113). The cost reduction associated with the SPC was primarily driven by savings in hospitalization costs, amounting to €1,850 (95% CI 17-7,813) and €2,027 (95% CI 19-8,603) for patients treated with the SPC and two-pill combination, respectively. Conversely, drug costs were higher for the SPC (€3,848, 95% CI 574-10,640 vs. €3,710, 95% CI 263-11,955). The cost-effectiveness profile did not significantly change according to age, sex, and clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: The SPC was projected to be cost-effective compared with the two-pill combination at almost all reasonable willingness-to-pay thresholds. As it is currently prescribed to only a few patients, the widespread use of this strategy could result in benefits for both patients and the healthcare system.

Preferred diuretic therapy for primary hypertension: Chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide?

ABSTRACT: Because of its greater reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), chlorthalidone is recommended over hydrochlorothiazide as the preferred diuretic for patients with primary hypertension. However, hydrochlorothiazide is more commonly prescribed than chlorthalidone for this condition. This article reviews recent studies investigating the effectiveness of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in reducing MACE, to help clinicians make an evidence-based informed decision on which diuretic to prescribe.

Time series forecasting of weight for diuretic dose adjustment using bidirectional long short-term memory.

Loop diuretics are prevailing drugs to manage fluid overload in heart failure. However, adjusting to loop diuretic doses is strenuous due to the lack of a diuretic guideline. Accordingly, we developed a novel clinician decision support system for adjusting loop diuretics dosage with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm using time-series EMRs. Weight measurements were used as the target to estimate fluid loss during diuretic therapy. We designed the TSFD-LSTM, a bi-directional LSTM model with an attention mechanism, to forecast weight change 48 h after heart failure patients were injected with loop diuretics. The model utilized 65 variables, including disease conditions, concurrent medications, laboratory results, vital signs, and physical measurements from EMRs. The framework processed four sequences simultaneously as inputs. An ablation study on attention mechanisms and a comparison with the transformer model as a baseline were conducted. The TSFD-LSTM outperformed the other models, achieving 85% predictive accuracy with MAE and MSE values of 0.56 and 1.45, respectively. Thus, the TSFD-LSTM model can aid in personalized loop diuretic treatment and prevent adverse drug events, contributing to improved healthcare efficacy for heart failure patients.

Diuretics use in the management of hypertension.

Diuretics have been used for decades in the treatment of hypertension. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. It is well known that the reduction in cardiovascular risk is a consequence of the reduction in blood pressure levels regardless of the drug used, but thiazide diuretics continue to be first-line drugs, especially in low doses and combined with other drugs. The debate on the advantages of using chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide continues, however hydrochlorothiazide is drug most used and for which there is greater availability. The association with potassium-sparing diuretics increases the effectiveness and reduces the adverse reactions of thiazides. A new group of drugs, close to potassium-sparing diuretics, that antagonise aldosterone synthase are showing promising results as antihypertensives. There are no significant differences between men and women regarding the antihypertensive effect of thiazide diuretics.

Semaglutide and diuretic use in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. METHODS: In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. RESULTS: At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from -8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10.3, -6.3] to -6.9% [95% CI -9.1, -4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24-.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.

Comparison of preventive effects of combined furosemide and mannitol versus single diuretics, furosemide or mannitol, on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nephrotoxicity is a common dose-limiting toxicity, and diuretics are often administered to prevent nephrotoxicity. However, the efficacy and optimal administration of diuretics in preventing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity remain to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining furosemide and mannitol to prevent CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, including 396 patients who received one or two diuretics for CDDP-based chemotherapy, compared using propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for nephrotoxicity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nephrotoxicity between the two groups (22.2% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.416). Hypertension, CDDP dose ≥ 75 mg/m2, and no magnesium supplementation were identified as risk factors for nephrotoxicity, whereas the use of diuretics was not found to be a risk factor. The combination of furosemide and mannitol showed no advantage over a single diuretic in preventing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. The renal function of patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy (≥ 75 mg/m2) and that of those with hypertension should be carefully monitored. Magnesium supplementation is important for these patients.

Acetazolamide As A Valuable Addition to Acute Heart Failure?

Consider IV Acetazolamide in addition to standard IV loop diuretic therapy in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.1.

Hemodynamic Changes in Intrarenal Blood Flow are Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

AIM: To evaluate a potential role of different patterns of intrarenal blood flow using Doppler ultrasound as a part of determining the severity of venous congestion, predicting impairment of renal function and an unfavorable prognosis in patients with acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational single-site study included 75 patients admitted in the intensive care unit for ADCHF. Upon admission all patients underwent bedside renal venous Doppler ultrasound to determine the blood flow pattern (continuous, biphasic, monophasic). In one hour after the initiation of intravenous diuretic therapy, sodium concentration was measured in a urine sample. The primary endpoint was the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). The secondary endpoints were the development of diuretic resistance (a need to increase the furosemide daily dose by more than 2 times compared with the baseline), decreased natriuretic response (defined as urine sodium concentration less than 50-70 mmol/l), and in-hospital death. RESULTS: According to the data of Doppler ultrasound, normal renal blood flow was observed in 40 (53%) patients, biphasic in 21 (28%) patients, and monophasic in 14 (19%) patients. The monophasic pattern of intrarenal blood flow was associated with the highest incidence of AKI: among 14 patients in this group, AKI developed in 100% of cases (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.5-5.8, p<0.01), while among patients with normal and moderate impairment of renal blood flow, there was no significant increase in the risk of developing AKI. The odds of in-hospital death were increased 25.77 times in patients with monophasic renal blood flow (95% CI: 5.35-123.99, p<0.001). Patients with a monophasic intrarenal blood flow pattern were also more likely to develop diuretic resistance compared to patients with other blood flow patterns (p<0.001) and had a decreased sodium concentration to less than 50 mmol/l (p<0.001) in a spot urine test obtained one hour after the initiation of furosemide administration. CONCLUSION: Patients with monophasic intrarenal blood flow are at a higher risk of developing AKI, diuretic resistance with decreased natriuretic response, and in-hospital death.

Evaluation of renal sodium handling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A pilot study.

The pathophysiology behind sodium retention in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with HFpEF have impaired natriuresis and diuresis in response to volume expansion and diuretic challenge, which is associated with renal hypo-responsiveness to endogenous natriuretic peptides. Nine HFpEF patients and five controls received saline infusion (0.25 mL/kg/min for 60 min) followed by intravenous furosemide (20 mg or home dose) 2 h after the infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline, 2 h after saline infusion, and 2 h after furosemide administration; urinary volumes were recorded. The urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (ucGMP)/plasma B-type NP (BNP) ratio was calculated as a measure of renal response to endogenous BNP. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the groups. Compared to controls, HFpEF patients had reduced urine output (2480 vs.3541 mL; p = 0.028), lower urinary sodium excretion over 2 h after saline infusion (the percentage of infused sodium excreted 12% vs. 47%; p = 0.003), and a lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratio (0.7 vs. 7.3 (pmol/mL)/(mg/dL)/(pg/mL); p = 0.014). Patients with HFpEF had impaired natriuretic response to intravenous saline and furosemide administration and lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratios indicating renal hypo-responsiveness to NPs.

Diuretic response after neonatal cardiac surgery: a report from the NEPHRON collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Multicenter early diuretic response (DR) analysis of single furosemide dosing following neonatal cardiac surgery is lacking to inform whether early DR predicts adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the NEPHRON registry. Random forest machine learning generated receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and odds ratios for mechanical ventilation (MV) and respiratory support (RS). Prolonged MV and RS were defined using ≥ 90th percentile of observed/expected ratios. Secondary outcomes were prolonged CICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and kidney failure (stage III acute kidney injury (AKI), peritoneal dialysis, and/or continuous kidney replacement therapy on postoperative day three) assessed using covariate-adjusted ROC-AUC curves. RESULTS: A total of 782 children were included. Cumulative urine output (UOP) metrics were lower in prolonged MV and RS patients, but DR poorly predicted prolonged MV (highest AUC 0.611, OR 0.98, sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.53, p = 0.006, 95% OR CI 0.96-0.99 for cumulative 6-h UOP) and RS (highest AUC 0.674, OR 0.94, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.91-0.97 UOP between 3 and 6 h). Secondary outcome results were similar. DR had fair discrimination for kidney failure (AUC 0.703, OR 0.94, sensitivity 0.63, specificity 0.71, 95% OR CI 0.91-0.98, p < 0.001, cumulative 6-h UOP). CONCLUSIONS: Early DR poorly discriminated patients with prolonged MV, RS, and LOS in this cohort, though it may identify severe postoperative AKI phenotype. Future work is warranted to determine if early DR or late postoperative DR later, in combination with other AKI metrics, may identify a higher-risk phenotype.

Reduced congestion and improved response to a fluid/sodium challenge in chronic heart failure patients after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan: The NATRIUM-HF study.

AIMS: The effects of initiating sacubitril/valsartan in patients with stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on response to fluid and sodium expansion are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have explored changes in natriuresis, diuresis, and congestion in response to the administration of intravenous fluid/sodium load in patients with HFrEF before as compared to after the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. At baseline (before sacubitril/valsartan initiation) and 2 and 3 months after the initiation, patients underwent an evaluation that consisted of three phases of 3 h: the rest phase (0-3 h), the load phase (3-6 h) in which 1 L of intravenous Ringer solution was administered, and the diuretic phase (6-9 h) at the beginning of which furosemide was administered. Overall, 216 patients completed the study. In comparison to baseline values, at 2 and 3 months after sacubitril/valsartan initiation, patients' diuresis and natriuresis in response to Ringer administration significantly increased (mean difference: 38.8 [17.38] ml, p = 0.0040, and 9.6 [2.02] mmol, p < 0.0001, respectively). Symptoms and signs of congestion after the fluid/sodium challenge were significantly decreased at months 2 and 3 compared to baseline. Compared to baseline, there was also an increment of natriuresis after furosemide administration on sacubitril/valsartan (9.8 [5.13] mmol, p = 0.0167). There was a significant decrease in body weight in subsequent visits when compared to baseline values (-0.50 [-12.7, 7.4] kg at 2 months, and -0.75 [-15.9, 7.5] kg at 3 months; both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients was associated with improvements in natriuresis, diuresis, and weight loss and better clinical adaptation to potentially decongestive stressors.

Renal function and natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy - a pre-specified analysis from the PUSH-AHF trial.

AIM: In a randomized controlled trial, we recently showed that a natriuresis-guided diuretic approach improved natriuresis and diuresis in patients with acute heart failure (HF). In this pre-specified analysis, we investigated the association between (worsening) renal function, outcomes and the effect of intensive natriuresis-guided loop diuretic therapy as compared with standard of care. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Pragmatic Urinary Sodium-based algoritHm in Acute Heart Failure (PUSH-AHF) trial randomized patients to natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy or standard of care. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed at fixed timepoints, and worsening renal function (WRF) was assessed at 72 h. The primary outcome was the interaction between randomized treatment allocation, baseline eGFR and the dual primary outcome of PUSH-AHF: total natriuresis at 24 h and time to all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization at 180 days. In 309 patients, median baseline eGFR was 53 (35-73) ml/min/1.73 m2, and 58% had eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Baseline eGFR did not significantly modify the treatment effect of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy on natriuresis at 24 h (p for interaction = 0.730). However, baseline eGFR significantly modified the effect on all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization (p for interaction = 0.017): the risk of this second primary outcome was lower in patients with lower eGFR who were randomized to the natriuresis-guided group. In the natriuresis-guided arm, eGFR decreased more (-11.0 vs. -6.91 ml/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.002) during the first 3 days, but this effect was attenuated at discharge (-10.3 vs. -8.69 ml/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.38). WRF was more frequently observed in patients randomized to natriuresis-guided treatment, but was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Natriuresis-guided diuretic treatment improved diuresis and natriuresis irrespective of baseline eGFR and occurrence of WRF, was effective even in patients with low eGFR, and the observed effect on eGFR was transient and not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Diuresis Efficacy in Ambulatory Congested Heart Failure Patients: Intrapatient Comparison of 3 Diuretic Regimens (DEA-HF).

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding efficacy and safety of diuretic regimens in ambulatory, congestion-refractory, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the potency and safety of commonly used diuretic regimens in CHF patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study conducted in NYHA functional class II to IV CHF patients, treated in an ambulatory day-care unit. Each patient received 3 different diuretic regimens: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250 mg; IV furosemide 250 mg plus oral metolazone 5 mg; and IV furosemide 250 mg plus IV acetazolamide 500 mg. Treatments were administered once a week, in 1 of 6 randomized sequences. The primary endpoint was total sodium excretion, and the secondary was total urinary volume excreted, both measured for 6 hours post-treatment initiation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were recruited. Administration of furosemide plus metolazone resulted in the highest weight of sodium excreted, 4,691 mg (95% CI: 4,153-5,229 mg) compared with furosemide alone, 3,835 mg (95% CI: 3,279-4,392 mg; P = 0.015) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide 3,584 mg (95% CI: 3,020-4,148 mg; P = 0.001). Furosemide plus metolazone resulted in 1.84 L of urine (95% CI: 1.63-2.05 L), compared with 1.58 L (95% CI: 1.37-1.8); P = 0.039 collected following administration of furosemide plus acetazolamide and 1.71 L (95% CI: 1.49-1.93 L) following furosemide alone. The incidence of worsening renal function was significantly higher when adding metolazone (39%) to furosemide compared with furosemide alone (16%) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide (2.6%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory CHF patients, furosemide plus metolazone resulted in a significantly higher natriuresis compared with IV furosemide alone or furosemide plus acetazolamide.

Serial direct sodium removal in patients with heart failure and diuretic resistance.

AIMS: Loop diuretics may exacerbate cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in heart failure (HF). Direct sodium removal (DSR) using the peritoneal membrane, in conjunction with complete diuretic withdrawal, may improve CRS and diuretic resistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF requiring high-dose loop diuretics were enrolled in two prospective, single-arm studies: RED DESERT (n = 8 euvolaemic patients), and SAHARA (n = 10 hypervolaemic patients). Loop diuretics were withdrawn, and serial DSR was utilized to achieve and maintain euvolaemia. At baseline, participants required a median 240 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 200-400) oral furosemide equivalents/day, which was withdrawn in all participants during DSR (median time of DSR 4 weeks [IQR 4-6]). Diuretic response (queried by formal 40 mg intravenous furosemide challenge and 6 h urine sodium quantification) increased substantially from baseline (81 ± 37 mmol) to end of DSR (223 ± 71 mmol, p < 0.001). Median time to re-initiate diuretics was 87 days, and the median re-initiation dose was 8% (IQR 6-10%) of baseline. At 1 year, diuretic dose remained substantially below baseline (30 [IQR 7.5-40] mg furosemide equivalents/day). Multiple dimensions of kidney function such as filtration, uraemic toxin excretion, kidney injury, and electrolyte handling improved (p < 0.05 for all). HF-related biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, carbohydrate antigen-125, soluble ST2, interleukin-6, and growth differentiation factor-15 (p < 0.003 for all) also improved. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and diuretic resistance, serial DSR therapy with loop diuretic withdrawal was feasible and associated with substantial and persistent improvement in diuretic resistance and several cardiorenal parameters. If replicated in randomized controlled studies, DSR may represent a novel therapy for diuretic resistance and CRS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: RED DESERT (NCT04116034), SAHARA (NCT04882358).

Combination of diuretics for acute heart failure: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a critical, costly condition with high mortality rates, affecting millions annually. Despite advances in cardiovascular care, AHF treatment lacks robust evidence. AHF commonly manifests with sudden heart failure symptoms such as pulmonary congestion, and the pathophysiology involves fluid overload. Initial treatment is based on intravenous diuretics typically, but the optimal combination of drugs remains uncertain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically review randomised controlled trials enrolling patients with AHF and volume overload undergoing in-hospital diuretic treatment. We aim to investigate any diuretic intervention. Our search strategy includes the following databases: Embase, Medline, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events, hospital readmission and kidney failure. Study results reported at the most extended follow-up will be used for all outcomes. If appropriate, we will conduct meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this study. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023463979.