What Would Equitable Harm Reduction Look Like?

Structural determinants of health frameworks must express antiracism to be effective, but racial and ethnic inequities are widely documented, even in harm reduction programs that focus on person-centered interventions. Harm reduction strategies should express social justice and health equity, resist stigma and discrimination, and mitigate marginalization experiences among people who use drugs (PWUD). To do so, government and organizational policies that promote harm reduction must acknowledge historical and ongoing patterns of racializing drug use. This article gives examples of such racialization and offers recommendations about how harm reduction programming can most easily and effectively motivate equitable, antiracist care for PWUD.

Using an Equity in Research Framework to Develop a Community-Engaged Intervention to Improve Preexposure Uptake Among Black Women Living in the United States South.

ABSTRACT: In the U.S. South, over half of new HIV diagnoses occur among Black Americans with research lagging for women who face increased HIV rates and low PrEP uptake, among other health inequities. Community engaged research is a promising method for reversing these trends with established best practices for building infrastructure, implementing research, and translating evidence-based interventions into clinical and community settings. Using the 5Ws of Racial Equity in Research Framework (5Ws) as a racial equity lens, the following paper models a review of a salon-based intervention to improve PrEP awareness and uptake among Black women that was co-developed with beauty salons, stylists, and Black women through an established community advisory council. In this paper we demonstrate how the 5Ws framework was applied to review processes, practices, and outcomes from a community-engaged research approach. The benefits of and challenges to successful collaboration are discussed with insights for future research and community impact.

Using community-based participatory research methods to build the foundation for an equitable integrated health data system within a Canadian urban context.

Health inequalities amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic have disproportionately affected racialized and equity-deserving communities across Canada. In the Municipality of Peel, existing data, while limited, illustrates that individuals from racialized and equity-deserving communities continue to suffer, receive delayed care, and die prematurely. In response to these troubling statistics, grassroots community advocacy has called on health systems leaders in Peel to work with community and non-profit organizations to address the critical data and infrastructure gaps that hinder addressing the social determinants of health in the region. To support these advocacy efforts, we used a community-based participatory research approach to understand how we might build a data collection ecosystem across sectors, alongside community residents and service providers, to accurately capture the data about the social determinants of health. This approach involved developing a community engagement council, defining the problem with the community, mapping what data is actively collected and what is excluded, and understanding experiences of sociodemographic data collection from community members and service providers. Guided by community voices, our study focused on sociodemographic data collection in the primary care context and identified which service providers use and collect these data, how data are used in their work, the facilitators and barriers to data use and collection. Additionally, we gained insight into how sociodemographic data collection could be respectful, safe, and properly governed from the perspectives of community members. From this study, we identify a set of eight recommendations for sociodemographic data collection and highlight limitations. This foundational community-based work will inform future research in establishing data governance in partnership with diverse and equity-deserving communities.

Bridging the gap to meet complex needs: an intersectoral action well supported by appropriate policies and governance.

Many people face problems about physical, mental, and social dimensions of health, and may have complex needs. They often experience a mismatch between their needs and the ability of the healthcare system to meet them, resulting in under- or overutilization of the healthcare system. On one hand, improving access to community-based primary healthcare for hard-to-reach populations should bring all healthcare and social services to one point of contact, near the community. On the other hand, better addressing the unmet needs of people who overuse healthcare services calls for integrated care among providers across all settings and sectors. In either case, intersectoral action between healthcare and social professionals and resources remains central to bringing care closer to the people and the community, enhancing equitable access, and improving health status. However, efforts to implement integrated care are unevenly weighted toward clinical and professional strategies (micro level), which could jeopardize our ability to implement and sustain integrated care. The development of appropriate policies and governance mechanisms (macro level) is essential to break down silos, promote a coherent intersectoral action, and improve health equity.

Long-acting injectable ART to advance health equity: a descriptive analysis of US clinic perspectives on barriers, needed support and programme goals for implementation from applications to the ALAI UP Project.

INTRODUCTION: Approval of the first long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI ART) medication heralded a new era of HIV treatment. However, the years since approval have been marked by implementation challenges. The "Accelerating Implementation of Multilevel Strategies to Advance Long-Acting Injectable for Underserved Populations (ALAI UP Project)" aims to accelerate the systematic and equitable delivery of LAI ART. METHODS: We coded and analysed implementation barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains, desired resources and programme goals from questionnaire short-answer responses by clinics across the United States responding to ALAI UP's solicitation to participate in the project between November 2022 and January 2023. RESULTS: Thirty-eight clinics responded to ALAI UP's solicitation. The characteristics of LAI ART as an innovation (cost, complexity of procurement, dosing interval, limited eligibility) precipitated and interacted with barriers in other CFIR domains. Barriers included obtaining coverage for the cost of medication (27/38 clinics) (outer setting); need for new workflows and staffing (12/38) and/or systems to support injection scheduling/coordination (16/38), transportation and expanded clinic hours (13/38) (inner setting); and patient (10/38) and provider (7/38) education (individuals). To support implementation, applicants sought: technical assistance to develop protocols and workflows (18/38), specifically strategies to address payor challenges (8/38); additional staff for care coordination and benefits navigation (17/38); opportunities to share experiences with other implementing clinics (12/38); patient-facing materials to educate and increase demand (7/38); and support engaging communities (6/38). Clinics' LAI ART programme goals varied. Most prioritized delivering LAI ART to their most marginalized patients struggling to achieve viral suppression on oral therapy, despite awareness that current US Food and Drug Administration approval is only for virally suppressed patients. The goal for LAI ART reach after 1 year of implementation ranged from ≤10% of patients with HIV on LAI ART (17/38) to ≥50% of patients (2/38). CONCLUSIONS: Diverse clinic types are interested in offering LAI ART and most aspire to use LAI ART to support their most vulnerable patients sustain viral suppression. Dedicated resources centred on equity and relevant to context and population are needed to support implementation. Otherwise, the introduction of LAI ART risks exacerbating, not ameliorating, health disparities.

Health of the black population in health training: perspectives towards racial equity. / Saúde da população negra na formação em saúde: perspectivas rumo à equidade racial.

This article aims to understand the view of racial equity and the motivations for approaching the health of the black population in Collective Health, Nursing, and Medicine courses at a Brazilian public university, guided by the black perspective of decoloniality. Considering Institutional Racism, it is necessary to invest in the interfaces between the education and health sectors in the training of professionals for the Unified Health System. This is a qualitative study with an intervention-research approach, affirming a social and political commitment to transforming reality. Workshops were held with representatives of the Structuring Teaching Centers of the selected courses. The theme of the health of the black population has been elaborated in a prompt and decontextualized manner, with no reflection based on structural racism, power relations, and Brazilian socio-historical formation. This creates a distance from the guidelines proposed by the National Policy for Comprehensive Health of the Black Population. At the end of this article, perspectives are identified for the reorientation of health training, aimed at increasing democratic density and racial equity.

Este artigo objetiva compreender a visão de equidade racial e as motivações para a abordagem da saúde da população negra na formação dos cursos de Saúde Coletiva, Enfermagem e Medicina de uma universidade pública brasileira, orientado na perspectiva negra da decolonialidade. Considerando o Racismo Institucional, é preciso investir nas interfaces entre os setores educação e saúde na formação de profissionais para o Sistema Único de Saúde. Trata-se de estudo de natureza qualitativa com abordagem do tipo pesquisa-intervenção, afirmando um compromisso social e político de transformação da realidade. Para tanto, foram realizadas oficinas com representantes dos Núcleos Docentes Estruturantes dos cursos selecionados. A temática da saúde da população negra tem sido trabalhada de forma pontual e descontextualizada, sem uma reflexão do racismo estrutural, das relações de poder e da formação socio-histórica brasileira, o que se distancia das diretrizes propostas pela Política Nacional de Saúde Integral da População Negra. Ao final, são sinalizadas perspectivas para a reorientação da formação em saúde, visando ao aumento da densidade democrática e da equidade racial.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion: Evolving into belonging, dignity, and justice.

The authors want to invite the integrated care community to reflect with us on an evolutionary shift in how we approach matters of justice and equity: from a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) framework to a perspective that centers the relational concepts of belonging, dignity, and justice (BDJ) for a more just world (Davis, 2021). Our desire to reflect, question, and pivot is inspired by the Ecocycle Planning Model-which I (Deepu George) used to critically frame the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association's (CFHA) history in Part I of the article (George, 2023a) and creatively anticipate our future in Part II (George & Khatri, 2024). In this article, the authors want to focus on the nodes of maturity and creative destruction, as well as the idea of the rigidity trap-to examine our collective energies around the idea of DEI. With CFHA's 30th anniversary upon us, we pause and reflect on not only the benefits of DEI efforts heretofore, but also the pitfalls, to avoid the rigidity trap, which is likely to occur when we embrace tenets of an idea that may no longer serve the values we once aspired to or fail to evolve in favor of the familiar. Considering critiques of the limitations of DEI work in practice and literature, the authors believe a BDJ approach will better inform our growth moving forward. Therefore, the authors want to reflect, honor, and build upon the impact and gains from DEI and adapt them to better serve the needs of all-especially the historically marginalized and underrepresented voices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Building Successful Partnerships Between State Health Departments and Attorney General Offices: The Minnesota Example.

In recent years, the Minnesota Attorney General's Office and the Minnesota Department of Health have cultivated a productive partnership to strengthen the state's multidisciplinary response to overlapping health equity and social justice issues. This article describes shared efforts in three areas: post-conviction justice, drug overdose, and human trafficking/exploitation.

Local Public Health Departments at the Intersection of Climate Change, Health Equity, and Public Health Laws and Policies.

Public health laws and policies are uniquely able to mitigate the adverse and inequitable health impacts of climate change. This article summarizes some key considerations in developing such laws and policies and a variety of approaches local public health departments are using to increase climate resilience and health equity.

Barriers and Opportunities for Tribal Access to Public Health Data to Advance Health Equity.

Public health authorities (PHAs), including Tribal nations, have the right and responsibility to protect and promote the health of their citizens. Although Tribal nations have the same need and legal authority to access public health data as any other PHA, significant legal challenges continue to impede Tribal data access.

INTRODUCTION.

The National Public Health Law Conference: People. Policy. Progress., held October 2023, brought together more than 400 stakeholders in public health to explore how law and policy can be leveraged to advance health equity, improve data sharing for community health, protect access to reproductive health and facilitate system change.

Opportunities in Public Health Law: Supporting Current and Future Practitioners.

Law is a critical determinant of health that public health practitioners encounter in everyday practice. Yet most do not receive any formal public health law training. This article discusses tangible opportunities for strengthening the capacity of current and future practitioners to leverage law to advance health equity priorities.

Methods to advance health equity and social justice in healthcare: Protocol for a scoping review on the utilisation of routinely collected data.

BACKGROUND: Many areas of healthcare are impacted by a paucity of research that is translatable to clinical practice. Research utilising real-world data, such as routinely collected patient data, may be one option to efficiently create evidence to inform practice and service delivery. Such studies are also valuable for exploring (in)equity of services and outcomes, and benefit from using non-selected samples representing the diversity of the populations served in the 'real world'. This scoping review aims to identify and map the published research which utilises routinely collected clinical healthcare data. A secondary aim is to explore the extent to which this literature supports the pursuit of social justice in health, including health inequities and intersectional approaches. METHOD: This review utilises Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews and draws on the recommended enhancements of this framework to promote a team-based and mixed methods approach. This includes searching electronic databases and screening papers based on a pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data relevant to the research aims will be extracted from included papers, including the clinical/professional area of the topic, the source of data that was used, and whether it addresses elements of social justice. All screening and reviewing will be collaborative and iterative, drawing on strengths of the research team and responsive changes to challenges will be made. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, and conceptual content analysis will be utilised to understand qualitative data. These will be collectively synthesised in alignment to the research aims. CONCLUSION: Our findings will highlight the extent to which such research is being conducted and published, including gaps and make recommendations for future endeavours for real-world data studies. The findings from this scoping review will be relevant for practitioners and researchers, as well as health service managers, commissioners, and research funders.