T cell immunotherapy for cervical cancer: challenges and opportunities.

Cancer cellular immunotherapy has made inspiring therapeutic effects in clinical practices, which brings new hope for the cure of cervical cancer. CD8+T cells are the effective cytotoxic effector cells against cancer in antitumor immunity, and T cells-based immunotherapy plays a crucial role in cellular immunotherapy. Tumor infiltrated Lymphocytes (TIL), the natural T cells, is approved for cervical cancer immunotherapy, and Engineered T cells therapy also has impressive progress. T cells with natural or engineered tumor antigen binding sites (CAR-T, TCR-T) are expanded in vitro, and re-infused back into the patients to eradicate tumor cells. This review summarizes the preclinical research and clinical applications of T cell-based immunotherapy for cervical cancer, and the challenges for cervical cancer immunotherapy.

Symptom burden survey and symptom clusters in patients with cervical cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence and severity of symptoms of patients with cervical cancer within 6 months after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, form a symptom burden report, evaluate the distribution characteristics of symptoms, identify symptom clusters, and provide a basis for clinical doctors and nurses to improve the symptom management of patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS: The patients with cervical cancer within 6 months after radiotherapy and chemotherapy were recruited to investigate their symptom burden. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify symptom clusters. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients participated in the study. The study found that the most common symptom among the 40 symptoms was fatigue, and the most serious symptom was nocturia. Based on the occurrence rate and severity of symptoms, nine symptom clusters were identified, including psycho-emotion-related symptom cluster, pain-disturbed sleep-related symptom cluster, menopausal symptom cluster, tinnitus-dizziness-related symptom cluster, urinary-related symptom cluster, dry mouth-bitter taste-related symptom cluster, intestinal-related symptom cluster, memory loss-numbness-related symptom cluster, and emaciation-related symptom cluster. The three most serious symptom clusters are pain-disturbed sleep-related symptom cluster, urinary-related symptom cluster, and memory loss-numbness-related symptom cluster. CONCLUSION: The symptoms of patients with cervical cancer within 6 months after radiotherapy and chemotherapy are complex, and nine symptom clusters can be identified according to the incidence and severity of symptoms. We can find the potential biological mechanism of each symptom cluster through the discussion of previous mechanism research and clinical research. The number of symptom clusters and the number of symptoms within the symptom cluster are closely related to the symptom evaluation scale selected for the study. Therefore, the symptom cluster study urgently needs a targeted symptom evaluation scale that can comprehensively reflect the patient's condition.

Greater increases in intratumoral apparent diffusion coefficients after chemoradiotherapy predict better overall survival of patients with cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 1) the intratumoral apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) change during cervical cancer treatment and 2) the pretreatment ADC values or their change after treatment predict the treatment outcome or overall survival of patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 52 patients with inoperable cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy, who had undergone diffusion weighted MRI before treatment and post external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. A subgroup of patients (n = 28) underwent altogether six consecutive diffusion weighted MRIs; 1) pretreatment, 2) post-EBRT and concurrent chemotherapy; 3-5) during image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) and 6) after completing the whole treatment course. To assess interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility two observers independently measured the ADCs by drawing freehand a large region of interest (L-ROI) covering the whole tumor and three small ROIs (S-ROIs) in areas with most restricted diffusion. RESULTS: Reproducibility was equally good for L-ROIs and S-ROIs. The pretreatment ADCs were higher in L-ROIs (883 mm2/s) than in S-ROIs (687 mm2/s, P < 0.001). The ADCs increased significantly between the pretreatment and post-EBRT scans (L-ROI: P < 0.001; S-ROI: P = 0.001). The ADCs remained significantly higher than pretreatment values during the whole IGBT. Using S-ROIs, greater increases in ADCs between pretreatment and post-EBRT MRI predicted better overall survival (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: ADC values significantly increase during cervical cancer treatment. Greater increases in ADC values between pretreatment and post-EBRT predicted better overall survival using S-ROIs. Standardized methods for timing and delineation of ADC measurements are advocated in future studies.

MR Imaging in Cervical Cancer: Initial Staging and Treatment.

Cervical cancer remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality for women globally despite medical advances in preventative medicine and treatment. The 2018 Internal Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics committee modified their original 2009 staging scheme to incorporate advanced imaging modalities, where available, to increase the accuracy of staging and to guide evolving treatments. Having a robust understanding of the newest staging iteration, its consequences on treatment pathways, and common imaging pitfalls will aid the radiologist in generating valuable and practical reports to optimize treatment strategies.

A case of endocervical adenocarcinoma of the gastric type that was repeatedly misdiagnosed: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GAS) is non-human papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer and the location of the lesions is in the cervical canal mostly. PATIENT CONCERNS: Vaginal discharge is mistakenly thought to be caused by uterine fibroids. Misdiagnosis leads to disease progression. DIAGNOSES: Magnetic resonance imaging is an auxiliary tool and pathology is the gold standard for the diagnosis. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery and supplementary radiotherapy and chemotherapy ± targeted therapy are the main treatment methods. OUTCOMES: GAS with high malignant degree poor prognosis and insidious development, tends to develop toward the cervical canal and is lack of specific tumor markers, so it is easy to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. LESSONS: This case highlights the importance of improving the understanding of GAS. And when patients perform vaginal discharge, cervical canal hypertrophy, and cervical cancer screening negative, clinicians ought to be highly alert to GAS.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Individualized Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Cervical cancer is still the fourth most common cancer in women throughout the world; an estimated 604,000 new cases were observed in 2020. Better knowledge of its pathogenesis, gained in recent years, has introduced new preventive and diagnostic approaches. Knowledge of its pathogenesis has made it possible to provide individualized surgical and drug treatment. In industrialized countries, cervical cancer has become a less frequent tumor entity due to the accessibility of the human papilloma virus vaccination, systematic preventive programs/early detection programs, health care infrastructure and the availability of effective therapy options. Nevertheless, globally, neither mortality nor morbidity has been significantly reduced over the past 10 years, and therapy approaches differ widely. The aim of this review is to address recent advances in the prevention, diagnostic investigation and treatment of cervical cancer globally, focusing on advances in Germany, with a view toward providing an updated overview for clinicians. The following aspects are addressed in detail: (a) the prevalence and causes of cervical cancer, (b) diagnostic tools using imaging techniques, cytology and pathology, (c) pathomechanisms and clinical symptoms of cervical cancer and (d) different treatment approaches (pharmacological, surgical and others) and their impact on outcomes.

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors.

BACKGROUND: To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT). METHODS: Based on tumor staging, patients with stage IIIC were divided into T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 5 years. RESULTS: We included 4,086 patients (1,117, 1,019, 869, and 1,081 in the T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups, respectively). In the T1 group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.631, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150-2.315, P = 0.006) and DFS (HR = 1.665, 95% CI: 1.255-2.182, P < 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.226 and P = 0.921) or DFS (P = 0.343 and P = 0.535) than R-CT. In the T2a group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (HR = 1.454, 95% CI: 1.057-2.000, P = 0.021) and DFS (HR = 1.529, 95% CI: 1.185-1.974, P = 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.736 and P = 0.267) or DFS (P = 0.714 and P = 0.087) than R-CT. In the T2b group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in DFS (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.347-2.532, P < 0.001) than R-CT nevertheless was not correlated with OS (P = 0.146); ARH was not correlated with OS (P = 0.056) and DFS (P = 0.676). In the T3 group, the OS rates of ARH (n = 10), NACT (n = 18), and R-CT (n = 1053) were 67.5%, 53.1%, and 64.7% (P = 0.941), and the DFS rates were 68.6%, 45.5%, and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.761). CONCLUSION: R-CT oncological outcomes were not entirely superior to those of NACT or ARH under different local tumor factors with stage IIIC. NACT is not suitable for stage T1, T2a, and T2b. Nevertheless ARH is potentially applicable to stage T1, T2a, T2b and T3. The results of stage T3 require confirmation through further research due to disparity in case numbers in each subgroup.

Patterns of care and health care resource use among Medicaid-enrolled women with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a public health challenge and remains a disease with high unmet need. Previous real-world studies demonstrated significant variability in treatments for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC). A large proportion of patients with cervical cancer are insured through Medicaid; however, previous studies examining treatment patterns for r/mCC have not included Medicaid patients. As the r/mCC treatment landscape continues to evolve, there is a need to understand current real-world unmet need among patients with r/mCC enrolled in Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among Medicaid-enrolled women with r/mCC. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of nationwide Medicaid claims to assess patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU among patients with r/mCC between 2016 and 2019. First-line treatment (1L) for r/mCC was defined by the first administration of systemic therapy without concomitant radiation or surgery. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU were characterized by line of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 3,375 eligible adult female patients initiated systemic treatment for r/mCC between 2016 and 2019. Mean age at treatment initiation was 52.9 (SD ± 12.8) years. Nearly 1,300 (1,294, 38.3%) women had evidence of receiving second-line treatment (2L), with nearly one-third (N = 420) of those also having evidence of third-line treatment. The majority (60.5%) of 1L regimens were doublet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab, consistent with treatment guidelines. In contrast, no clear preferred treatment choice was observed among patients receiving 2L or later (2L+) therapy. Notably, immunotherapy accounted for 21.6% of treatment regimens in 2L/3L overall, with its use increasing substantially over time (<6% in 2016 to 40.8% in 2019). Despite increased use of immunotherapy, however, most patients did not remain on treatment for prolonged durations (immunotherapy median duration 2.2 months vs 2.4 months for nonimmunotherapy; P = 0.5). Across most HCRU measures (inpatient admissions, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and pharmacy claims), 2L+ patients had significantly less utilization per patient compared with 1L patients in unadjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found that the majority of Medicaid patients with r/mCC received guideline-recommended standard of care in 1L between 2016 and 2019. However, there was no clear standard of care for patients with 2L+ r/mCC enrolled in Medicaid over this time period. Although immunotherapy use is increasing, short durations of treatment suggest a potential unmet medical need among this population. New therapies should provide meaningful clinical benefit without significant increase in HCRU for Medicaid enrollees needing treatment for r/mCC. DISCLOSURES: Dr Leath has received consulting fees from Seagen Inc. for service on Scientific Advisory Boards, cervical cancer research funding from Agenus, Rubius Therapeutics, and Seagen Inc., and funding from the NCI UG1 CA23330 and P50 CA098252. Dr Ting and Dr Zhang are employees and stock owners of Seagen Inc. Mr Fiori and Dr Pauly are current employees and Ms Nysenbaum is a former employee of Manatt Health Strategies, which received funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct the study described here. Manatt Health Strategies has also previously received consulting fees from other pharmaceutical companies that they are not permitted to publicly disclose. This research was funded by Seagen Inc. Seagen Inc. conceptualized the study approach, methodology, and contributed to article writing and review but was not involved in data acquisition, manipulation, or analysis.

Post Treatment Sexual Function and Quality of Life of Patients Affected by Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to analyze the available scientific evidence regarding the quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF) in patients affected by cervical cancer (CC) after surgical and adjuvant treatments. Materials and Methods: Preliminary research was conducted via electronic database (MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) with the use of a combination of the following keywords: SF, QoL, and CC. The principal findings considered in the present review were the study design, the number of patients included in each study, the information about the malignancy (histology and stage of disease), the questionnaires administered, and the principal findings concerning SF and QoL. Results: All studies were published between 2003-2022. The studies selected consisted of one randomized control study, seven observational studies (three prospective series), and nine case control studies. The scores used were focused on SF, QOL, fatigue, and psychological aspects. All studies reported a decreased SF and QOL. The most developed questionnaires were the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). Discussion: All studies reported a decreased SF and QOL. In addition to the perception of body image, several factors coexist in influencing the outcomes such as the physical, hormonal, psychological. Conclusions: Sexual dysfunction after CC treatment has a multifactorial aetiology which negatively affects the quality of life. For these reasons, it is important to follow and support patients with a multidisciplinary team (doctors, nurses, psychologists, dieticians) before and after therapy. This type of tailored therapeutic approach should become a standard. Women should be informed about possible vaginal changes and menopausal symptoms after surgery and on the positive effects of psychological therapy.

Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally. As survival rates gradually increase, it becomes necessary to assess the quality of life (QoL) after treatment. It is known that different treatment modalities have different effects on QoL. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the QoL of cervical cancer survivors (CCSs) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional monocentric study, conducted in Vilnius university hospital Santaros klinikos between November 2018 and November 2022, included 20 women, who were interviewed once using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-designed Quality-of-Life questionnaire cervical cancer module (QLQ-CX24). The sociodemographic and clinical data as well as the results of the questionnaire are presented in mean, standard deviation and percentages. The QoL scores were compared between different age and stage groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Twenty participants, aged from 27 to 55 years, with a mean age of 44 years (SD = 7.6) participated in the study. All the participants were CCSs with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage from IB to IIIB and all of them were treated with CCRT. The symptom experience was relatively low and revealed a good result (21.8, SD = 10.2). Mean scores on body image, sexual/vaginal functioning, menopausal symptoms and sexual worry scales indicated moderate functioning and a moderate level of some of the cervical cancer specific symptoms after CCRT. Sexual activity and sexual enjoyment of the CCSs were low (11.7 (SD = 16.3), 14.3 (SD = 17.8), respectively). Conclusions: Cervical cancer survivors report a relatively good quality of life regarding symptom experience; however, women following concurrent chemoradiotherapy tend not to be sexually active and rarely feel sexual enjoyment. In addition, this treatment modality negatively affects a woman's body image and self-perception as a woman.

Insurance status and access to cervical cancer treatment in a specialized cancer center in Mexico.

To describe access to complete treatment in women with cervical cancer and state-sponsored insurance versus no insurance. We conducted a retrospective observational study. The source population consisted of women treated for cervical cancer from January 2000 to December 2015 in a tertiary care hospital. We included 411 women with state-sponsored insurance and 400 without insurance. We defined access to cervical cancer treatment as complete treatment (according NCCN/ESMO (National Comprehensive Cancer Network/European Society for Medical Oncology) standards) and timely initiation of treatment (less than 4 weeks). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were described and analyzed with logistic regression using complete treatment as the main outcome. A total of 811 subjects were included, the median age was 46 (IQR (Interquartile range) 42-50) years. Most of them were married (36.1%), unemployed (50.4%), and had completed primary school (44.0%). The most common clinical stages at diagnosis were II (38.2%) and III (24.7%). In the adjusted regression model, being married (OR (odds ratio): 4.3, 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.74-10.61) and having paid employment (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.59-4.90) or state-sponsored insurance (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.04-2.26) were positively associated with the possibility of having a complete treatment. Women with insurance were likely to be younger and receive timely treatment compared with uninsured women. Complete treatment was associated to insurance status and advanced stages of cervical cancer. State-sponsored insurance improves access to complete treatment. Government policies are needed to avoid social and economic inequity and provide better management of cervical cancer in our country.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction models used in cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women with an incidence of around 6.5 % of all the cancer in women worldwide. Early detection and adequate treatment according to staging improve the patient's life expectancy. Outcome prediction models might aid treatment decisions, but a systematic review on prediction models for cervical cancer patients is not available. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review for prediction models in cervical cancer following PRISMA guidelines. Key features that were used for model training and validation, the endpoints were extracted from the article and data were analyzed. Selected articles were grouped based on prediction endpoints i.e. Group1: Overall survival, Group2: progression-free survival; Group3: recurrence or distant metastasis; Group4: treatment response; Group5: toxicity or quality of life. We developed a scoring system to evaluate the manuscript. As per our criteria, studies were divided into four groups based on scores obtained in our scoring system, the Most significant study (Score > 60 %); Significant study (60 % > Score > 50 %); Moderately Significant study (50 % > Score > 40 %); least significant study (score < 40 %). A meta-analysis was performed for all the groups separately. RESULTS: The first line of search selected 1358 articles and finally 39 articles were selected as eligible for inclusion in the review. As per our assessment criteria, 16, 13 and 10 studies were found to be the most significant, significant and moderately significant respectively. The intra-group pooled correlation coefficient for Group1, Group2, Group3, Group4, and Group5 were 0.76 [0.72, 0.79], 0.80 [0.73, 0.86], 0.87 [0.83, 0.90], 0.85 [0.77, 0.90], 0.88 [0.85, 0.90] respectively. All the models were found to be good (prediction accuracy [c-index/AUC/R2] >0.7) in endpoint prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models of cervical cancer toxicity, local or distant recurrence and survival prediction show promising results with reasonable prediction accuracy [c-index/AUC/R2 > 0.7]. These models should also be validated on external data and evaluated in prospective clinical studies.

Cervical cancer in the pregnant population.

Cervical cancer is the second most encountered cancer in pregnant patients. The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer updated the staging of primary cervical carcinoma and disease process, with formal incorporation of imaging as a vital source of information in the management process to improve accuracy. Diagnosis and treatment of the pregnant population is a complex interplay of achieving adequate diagnostic information and optimal treatment while minimizing toxicity and risks to the mother and fetus. While novel imaging techniques and anticancer therapies are rapidly developed, much information on the safety and feasibility of different therapies is not yet available in the pregnant population. Therefore, managing pregnant patients with cervical cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Competitive Risk Model Nomogram to Predict Prognosis in Patients Aged Over 65 Years with nonmetastatic Cervical Cancer: A SEER Population-Based Study.

Objective: The prognostic factors for elderly patients with cervical cancer differ from those of younger patients. Competitive risk events could cause biases in the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. This study aimed to construct a competitive risk model (CRM) nomogram for patients aged > 65 years with nonmetastatic cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and a total of 1856 patients from 18 cancer registries across the United States diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare intergroup survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Fine and Gray's test were used to determine the impact of competitive risk events on prognosis. The CRM nomogram was internally and externally validated using time-dependent receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (time-AUC), Brier scores, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Analyses revealed that histology, age, the International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, number of in situ malignancies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), and surgery were independent prognostic factors. The CRM nomogram accurately predicted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS). The C-indexes and Brier scores of the CRM nomogram were 0.641 and 0.094, respectively, at the 1-year cut-off in the training set. The time-AUC of the CRM nomogram at the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year intervals in the training set were 77.6%, 77.3%, and 74.5%, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated a favorable concordance. DCA suggested that the nomogram had a good net benefit. Therefore, the Cox model underestimated the weight of risk factors compared to CRM. Conclusions: This study presents the CRM nomogram to predict DSS in patients aged > 65 years with nonmetastatic cervical cancer. It can help clinicians implement more accurate personalized diagnostic and treatment modalities for elderly patients with cervical cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer versus chemoradiotherapy alone (OUTBACK): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is chemoradiotherapy, but many patients relapse and die of metastatic disease. We aimed to determine the effects on survival of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: The OUTBACK trial was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 157 hospitals in Australia, China, Canada, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 year or older with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix (FIGO 2008 stage IB1 disease with nodal involvement, or stage IB2, II, IIIB, or IVA disease), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Participants were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) using a minimisation approach and stratified by pelvic or common iliac nodal involvement, requirement for extended-field radiotherapy, FIGO 2008 stage, age, and site to receive standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (40 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously once-a-week for 5 weeks, during radiotherapy with 45·0-50·4 Gy external beam radiotherapy delivered in fractions of 1·8 Gy to the whole pelvis plus brachytherapy; chemoradiotherapy only group) or standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of carboplatin (area under the receiver operator curve 5) and paclitaxel (155 mg/m2) given intravenously on day 1 of a 21 day cycle (adjuvant chemotherapy group). The primary endpoint was overall survival at 5 years, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all eligible patients who were randomly assigned). Safety was assessed in all patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group who started chemoradiotherapy and all patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group who received at least one dose of adjuvant chemotherapy. The OUTBACK trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01414608, and the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12610000732088. FINDINGS: Between April 15, 2011, and June 26, 2017, 926 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy only group (n=461) or the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n=465), of whom 919 were eligible (456 in the chemoradiotherapy only group and 463 in the adjuvant chemotherapy group; median age 46 years [IQR 37 to 55]; 663 [72%] were White, 121 [13%] were Black or African American, 53 [6%] were Asian, 24 [3%] were Aboriginal or Pacific islander, and 57 [6%] were other races) and included in the analysis. As of data cutoff (April 12, 2021), median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 45 to 65). 5-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI 67 to 76) in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (105 deaths) and 71% (66 to 75) in the chemoradiotherapy only group (116 deaths; difference 1% [95% CI -6 to 7]; hazard ratio 0·90 [95% CI 0·70 to 1·17]; p=0·81). In the safety population, the most common clinically significant grade 3-4 adverse events were decreased neutrophils (71 [20%] in the adjuvant chemotherapy group vs 34 [8%] in the chemoradiotherapy only group), and anaemia (66 [18%] vs 34 [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 107 (30%) in the adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 98 (22%) in the chemoradiotherapy only group, most commonly due to infectious complications. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy given after standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for unselected locally advanced cervical cancer increased short-term toxicity and did not improve overall survival; therefore, it should not be given in this setting. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council and National Cancer Institute.

Community-integrated self-collected HPV-based cervix screening in a low-resource rural setting: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial.

Effective approaches to improve coverage of self-collected human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervix screening (SCS) as well as attendance at treatment for HPV-positive participants are needed to inform policy on optimal integration of cervical cancer screening programs within existing infrastructure in low-resource settings. ASPIRE Mayuge was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in rural Mayuge district, Uganda, comparing the superiority of two recruitment implementation strategies for SCS: Door-to-Door versus Community Health Day. Villages were randomized (unblinded) to a strategy, and participants aged 25-49 years with no previous history of hysterectomy or treatment for cervical cancer or pre-cancer were eligible. Participants completed a survey and participated in SCS. The primary outcome was rate of attendance at treatment after a positive SCS. The trial randomized 31 villages and 2,019 participants included in these analyses (Door-to-Door: 16 clusters, 1,055 participants; Community Health Day: 15 clusters, 964 participants). Among HPV-positive participants, attendance at treatment rates were 75% (Door-to-Door) and 67% (Community Health Day) (P = 0.049). Participants in the Community Health Day intervention were less likely to attend treatment compared to Door-to-Door (risk ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.96). No adverse events were reported. Policymakers in low-resource settings can use these results to guide implementation of SCS programs. ISRCTN registration: 12767014 . ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04000503 .

RNA methylation-related genes of m6A, m5C, and m1A predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-, 5-methylcytosine (m5C)-, and N1-methyladenosine (m1A)-related genes in cervical cancer (CESC) and predicting immunotherapy response. METHODS: We downloaded cervical cancer mRNA expression profiles, clinical data, and m6A, m5C, m1A-related genes from public databases, and subjected them to serial bioinformatics analysis and clinical sample validation. RESULTS: Differential analysis revealed 106 methylation-related differential genes (MEDs), including 44 differentially downregulated and 62 upregulated genes. We then obtained methylation models containing 10 genes by univariate and multifactorial COX analysis. High risk genes with HR > 1 include IQGAP3, PTBP1, STAC3, CUX1, SLC2A1, and CA2, and low risk genes with HR < 1 include IGBP1, DUOX1, CHAF1A, and STAC3. We verified the accuracy of the model from inside TCGA and outside GSE39001 (AUC = 0.729). K-M analysis showed shorter survival times in the High-risk group, and Immunocytic infiltration analysis showed model genes closely associated with six immune cells. The high-risk group may benefit more effectively from immunosuppressive therapy, especially anti-CTLA-4 therapy (p < .05). We also screened nine drugs for potential treatment and verified the expression of three key genes SLC2A1, CUX1, and CA2 using immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR experiments with clinical samples. CONCLUSION: We identified a prognostic model using m6A/m5C/m1A-related genes in cervical cancer, which can predict survival time and correlate with immune cell infiltration. Additionally, anti-CTLA-4 may be used as an immunotherapeutic agent for cervical cancer.KEY MESSAGESCervical cancer still has a high mortality rate, we aim to establish a strong prognostic index and new treatment goals for improving patient survival.The role of three types of RNA methylation modifications, m6A, m5C, and m1A, in cervical cancer, remains unknown. Therefore, it is essential to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of m6A, m5C, and m1A methylation regulation in cervical cancer.We also screened nine drugs for potential treatment and anti-CTLA-4 may be used as an immunotherapeutic agent for cervical cancer. We verified the expression of three key genes SLC2A1, CUX1, and CA2.

Patient, disease, and survival outcomes for stage IB to stage IV cervical cancer-A population study.

BACKGROUND: Factors that impact recurrence in stages IB to IV include larger tumor, high-risk histology, older age, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI); however, local studies on risk factors for recurrence in British Columbia and our local recurrence patterns have not been well studied. Furthermore, the efficacy of treatment modalities including surgery and chemoradiation in the different stages of cervical cancer have not been clarified in this population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the disease and treatment characteristics of stages IB to IV cervical cancer which are associated with survival differences within British Columbia. METHODS/DESIGN: We performed a retrospective population study. A chart review on cervical cancer patients in British Columbia between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 was done. Demographic data and treatment details were collected. Data were analyzed using multivariate Cox regressions, pairwise comparison using the Log-Rank test, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: We included 780 patients (stage I: 31.5%, II: 20.0%, III: 34.5%, and IV: 3.3%). LVI and p16 negativity were associated with decreased overall survival (OS), and multivariate analyses show them to be independent risk factors for poorer survival. Surgical resection in stage I was associated with improved survival, but not with stages II-IV. The use of radical radiation therapy (RT), brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy were independently associated with improved survival in stages II-IV. Peri-RT chemotherapy was not associated with survival benefit in adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma. There were 180 recurrences (23.1%), mostly distant metastases (42.8%). There were fewer recurrences after resection of tumors <2 cm compared to tumors 2 cm or larger (6.49% vs 31.3%, p = 0.00011). Only 37.7% of recurrence/metastases were treated with first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, but it was associated with better OS compared to other regimens (median OS 40.1 vs 24.8 months, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A significant portion of patients with localized cervical cancer relapse despite radical therapy, with LVI and p16 negativity associated with poorer survival. Surgical resection may still play a role in stage IB disease, while RT, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy should be considered first-line therapy in stage II-IV diseases. First-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab for recurrence shows improved survival.

Microwave hyperthermia represses human papillomavirus oncoprotein activity and induces cell death due to cell stress in 3D tissue models of anogenital precancers and cancers.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia is a well-accepted cancer therapy. Microwaves provide a very precise, targeted means of hyperthermia and are currently used to treat plantar warts caused by cutaneous-infective human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Other HPV genotypes infecting the anogenital mucosa cause genital warts or preneoplastic lesions or cervical cancer. Effective, non-ablative therapies for these morbid HPV-associated lesions are lacking. METHODS: The molecular consequences of microwave treatment were investigated in in vitro cultured three-dimensional HPV-positive cervical tumour tissues, and tissues formed from HPV-infected normal immortalised keratinocytes. Microwave energy delivery to tissues was quantified. Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR was used to quantify mRNA expression. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence immunostaining was used to assess protein expression. FINDINGS: Microwave energy deposition induced sustained, localised cell death at the treatment site. There was a downregulation in levels of HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 alongside a reduction in cellular growth/proliferation and induction of apoptosis/autophagy. HSP70 expression confirmed hyperthermia, concomitant with induction of translational stress. INTERPRETATION: The data suggest that microwave treatment inhibits tumour cell proliferation and allows the natural apoptosis of HPV-infected cells to resume. Precision microwave delivery presents a potential new treatment for treating HPV-positive anogenital precancerous lesions and cancers. FUNDING: Funding was through an Innovate UK Biomedical Catalyst grant (ID# 92138-556187), a Chief Scientist Office grant (TCS/19/11) and core support from Medical Research Council (MC_ UU_12014) core funding for the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research.

The Role of Methylation of Host and/or Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) Lesions.

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is an intermediate stage between CIN 1, which is a low-grade lesion, and CIN3, which is the immediate precursor of cervical cancer (CC). Traditionally, CIN2 was regarded as a high-grade lesion and was treated with conization or ablative methods. In recent years, there has been a shift in the management of younger patients, who are now more often being managed conservatively due to frequent spontaneous CIN2 regression and possible adverse effects of treatment on future pregnancies. Because the risk of progression to CC still exists with conservative management, a personalized approach is needed to identify patients with a higher probability of progression. In this regard, research has focused on the role of host and human papillomavirus (HPV) gene methylation. This systematic review summarizes the current knowledge regarding conservative CIN2 management focusing on the main methylation markers and its implementation in conservative CIN2 management, and it describes major ongoing longitudinal studies on the subject. The review showed that DNA methylation is an accurate predictor of disease progression and a valid triage tool for HPV-positive women, with CIN2 performing better than triage cytology. Because virtually all CCs are methylation-positive, methylation-negative women at baseline have an extremely low risk of CC.