Change in taste sensation after orthognathic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on taste sensation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients scheduled to undergo Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), and bimaxillary surgery (BMS) were evaluated by administering localized and whole-mouth taste tests preoperatively and postoperatively at months 1, 3, and 6. The patients were asked to identify the quality of four basic tastes applied to six locations on the palate and tongue and to rate the taste intensities they perceived. Taste recognition thresholds and taste intesity scores were evaluted according to operation groups and follow-ups. RESULTS: There were significant decreases in the quinine HCl recognition thresholds at the postoperative follow-ups compared to the preoperative in LFIO patients (p = 0.043). There were significant decreases in sucrose taste intensity scores in the right posterolateral part of the tongue at months 3 and 6 compared to preoperative in SSRO patients (p = 0.046), and significant increases in quinine HCL taste intensity scores in the right and left anterior parts of the tongue at month 6 compared to preoperative in LFIO patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Taste perception is affected due to potential damage to the chemosensory nerves during orthognathic surgical procedures. Generally, non-significant alterations have been observed in taste perception after orthognathic surgery, except for significant alterations in bitter and sweet taste perceptions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of taste perception change after orthognathic surgery procedures and patients should be informed accordingly. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): NCT06103422/Date of registration: 10.17.2023 (retrospectively registered).

[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].

OBJECTIVE: To establish and assess the precision of pre-surgical condyle position planning using mandibular movement trajectory data for orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Skull data from large-field cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and dental oral scan data were imported into IVSPlan 1.0.25 software for 3D reconstruction and fusion, creating 3D models of the maxilla and mandible. Trajectory data of mandibular movement were collected using a mandibular motion recorder, and the data were integrated with the jaw models within the software. Subsequently, three-dimensional trajectories of the condyle were obtained through matrix transformations, rendering them visually accessible. A senior oral and maxillofacial surgeon with experience in both diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint disease and orthognathic surgery selected the appropriate condyle position using the condyle movement trajectory interface. During surgical design, the mobile mandibular proximal segment was positioned accordingly. Routine orthognathic surgical planning was completed by determining the location of the mandibular distal segment, which was based on occlusal relationships with maxilla and facial aesthetics. A virtual mandible model was created by integrating data from the proximal and distal segment bone. Subsequently, a solid model was generated through rapid prototyping. The titanium plate was pre-shaped on the mandibular model, and the screw hole positions were determined to design a condylar positioning guide device. In accordance with the surgical plan, orthognathic surgery was performed, involving mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The distal segment of the mandible was correctly aligned intermaxillary, while the proximal bone segment was positioned using the condylar positioning guide device and the pre-shaped titanium plate. The accuracy of this procedure was assessed in a study involving 10 patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion. Preoperative condyle location planning and intraoperative positioning were executed using the aforementioned techniques. CBCT data were collected both before the surgery and 2 weeks after the procedure, and the root mean square (RMS) distance between the preope-rative design position and the actual postoperative condyle position was analyzed. RESULTS: The RMS of the condyle surface distance measured was (1.59±0.36) mm (95%CI: 1.35-1.70 mm). This value was found to be significantly less than 2 mm threshold recommended by the expert consensus (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mandibular trajectory may play a guiding role in determining the position of the mandibular proximal segment including the condyle in the orthognathic surgery. Through the use of a condylar positioning guide device and pre-shaped titanium plates, the condyle positioning can be personalized and customized with clinically acceptable accuracy.

[Comparison of the virtual surgical planning position of maxilla and condyle with the postoperative real position in patients with mandibular protrusion].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference between virtual surgical planning (VSP) position and postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle, and to explore the degree of intraoperative realization of VSP after orthognathic surgery. METHODS: In this study, 36 patients with mandibular protrusion deformity from January 2022 to December 2022 were included. All the patients had been done bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) combined with Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy under guidance of VSP. The VSP data (T0) and 1-week postoperative CT (T1) were collected, the 3D model of postoperative CT was established and segmented into upper and lower jaws in CCMF Plan software. At the same time, accor-ding to the morphology of palatal folds, the virtual design was registered with the postoperative model, and the unclear maxillary dentition in the postoperative model was replaced. Then the postoperative model was matched with VSP model by registration of upper skull anatomy that was not affected by the operation. The three-dimensional reference plane and coordinate system were established. Selecting anatomical landmarks and their connections of condyle and maxilla for the measurement, we compared the coordinate changes of marker points in three directions, and the angle changes between the line connecting the marker points and the reference plane to analyze the positional deviation and the angle deviation of the postoperative condyle and maxilla compared to VSP. RESULTS: The postoperative real position of the maxilla deviates from the VSP by nearly 1 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, and the anteroposterior deviation was about 1.5 mm. In addition, most patients had a certain degree of counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla after surgery. Most of the bilateral condyle moved forward, outward and downward (the average distance deviation was 0.15 mm, 1.54 mm, 2.19 mm, respectively), and rotated forward, outward and upward (the average degree deviation was 4.32°, 1.02°, 0.86°, respectively) compared with the VSP. CONCLUSION: VSP can be mostly achieved by assistance of 3D printed occlusal plates, but there are certain deviations in the postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle compared with VSP, which may be related to the rotation axis of the mandible in the VSP. It is necessary to use patient personalized condylar rotation axis for VSP, and apply condylar positioning device to further improve surgical accuracy.

Three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla using novel intermediate splints in maxilla-first orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III deformity.

OBJECTIVES: Successful orthognathic surgery requires accurate transfer of the intraoperative surgical plan. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the surgical error of a novel intermediate splint in positioning the maxilla during maxilla-first orthognathic surgery and (2) determine factors influencing surgical error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study examined 83 patients who consecutively underwent Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of skeletal class III deformity using a novel intermediate splint and a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Surgical error was the outcome variable, measured as the difference in postoperative translational and rotational maxillary position from the virtual plan. Measures included asymmetry, need and amount for mandibular opening during fabrication of intermediate splints, and planned and achieved skeletal movement. RESULTS: Mean errors in translation for vertical, sagittal, and transversal dimensions were 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, respectively; degrees in rotation for yaw, roll, and pitch were 0.8 ± 0.6, 0.6 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively. The transverse error was smaller than sagittal and vertical errors; error for pitch was larger than roll and yaw (both p < 0.001). Error for sagittal, transverse, and roll positioning was affected by the achieved skeletal movement (roll, p < 0.05; pitch and yaw, p < 0.001). Surgical error of pitch positioning was affected by planned and achieved skeletal movement (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the novel intermediate splint when performing Le Fort I osteotomy allowed for accurate positioning of the maxilla. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel intermediate splint for maxillary positioning can be reliably used in clinical routines.

OrthoCalc: The six degrees of freedom measurement workflow of rotational and displacement changes for maxilla positioning evaluation.

BACKGROUND: This study is undertaken to establish the accuracy and reliability of OrthoCalc, a 3D application designed for the evaluation of maxillary positioning. METHODS: We registered target virtual planned models, maxillary models from pre-operative and post-operative CT scans, and post-operative intra-oral scans to a common reference system, allowing for digital evaluation. To assess rotational changes, we introduced a novel measurement method based on virtual cuboid models. Displacement errors were calculated based on proposed registration matrices. We also compared OrthoCalc to established commercial medical software as a benchmark. RESULTS: Statistical significance calculated showed no significant differences between OrthoCalc and commercial software. the biggest error of 0.04 degree in rotation change was found in the yaw. A maximum displacement change of 0.75 mm was found in the X direction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validates OrthoCalc as a precise and reliable tool for assessing maxillary position changes with six degrees of freedom in orthognathic surgery, endorsing its clinical utility.

Validation of a fully automatic three-dimensional assessment of orthognathic surgery.

The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85-1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.

Three-dimensional facial soft-tissue changes after surgical orthodontics in different vertical facial types of skeletal Class III malocclusion: A retrospective study.

The study compared the soft-tissue response to hard-tissue movement among different Class III vertical facial types after orthognathic surgery (OGS). The study included 90 consecutive adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent two-jaw OGS. Patients were divided into three groups (high, medium, and low angle) based on the presurgical Frankfort-mandibular plane angle. Cone-beam computerized tomographs were taken before surgery and after debonding. Soft- and hard-tissue linear and angular measurements were performed using three-dimensional reconstruction images. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup comparisons. Soft tissue tended to respond more to hard-tissue movement in the lower lip area in patients with low angle (mean = 0.089, SD = 0.047, p = 0.023), whereas no significant difference was observed for other sites. Consistently, L1/Li thickness increased most significantly in the high-angle group (mean = 1.98, SD = 2.14, p = 0.0001), and B/Si thickness decreased most significantly after surgery (mean = 2.16, SD = 2.68, p = 0.016). The findings suggest that the high-angle group had a higher chance of undergoing genioplasty to enhance chin contour. Different OGS plans should be considered for different Class III vertical facial types.

Accuracy and stability of the condyle position after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and stability of condylar positioning in patients treated with bimaxillary procedures compared with patients treated with maxillary procedures alone. All patients had undergone treatment at Odense University Hospital and were treated with inferior maxillary procedures. The primary outcome was changes in condyle position and the primary predictor variable was time: pre-operative (T0) measurements to 1-week post-operative (T1) and 1-year post-operative (T2) measurements. Condyle movement was measured using dual voxel-based alignment. Sixteen patients were included. Seven patients underwent solitary maxillary procedure and 9 patients bimaxillary procedure. Bimaxillary procedures overall showed a condyle positional change in pitch from T0 to T1 and T1 to T2 compared to maxillary procedures alone. Condylar translation was stable despite large differences in positioning. Compared to solitary maxillary procedures, bimaxillary procedures showed a statistically significant anterocranial rotation at 1-week follow-up movement (3.95° vs. -0.95°; SD 3,74 vs 1,05; P value = 0.000) and an additional statistically significant anterocranial movement at 1 year after surgery (4.89° vs 0.60°; SD 3,82 vs 0,92; P value = 0.000). In conclusion a need for greater anterocranial stability of the sagittal split osteotomy than that provided by 3 bicortically fixated screws alone might be indicated.

Average Three-Dimensional Skeletofacial Model as a Template for Bone Repositioning during Virtual Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Virtual planning has revolutionized orthognathic surgery. This study presents a computer-assisted method for constructing average three-dimensional skeletofacial models that can be applied as templates for surgical planning for maxillomandibular repositioning. METHODS: The authors used the images of 60 individuals (30 women and 30 men) who had never undergone orthognathic surgery to construct an average three-dimensional skeletofacial model for male participants and one for female participants. The authors validated the accuracy of the newly developed skeletofacial models by comparing their images with 30 surgical simulation images (ie, skulls) that had been created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The comparison was conducted by superimposing surgical simulation images created using the authors' models with the previously created images to analyze their differences, particularly differences in the jawbone position. RESULTS: For all participants, the authors compared the jaw position in the surgical simulation images created using the authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models with that in the images created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The results revealed that the planned maxillary and mandibular positions were similar in both images and that the differences between all facial landmarks were less than 1 mm, except for one dental position. Most studies have reported less than 2 mm to be the success criterion for the distance difference between planned and outcome images; thus, the authors' data indicate high consistency between the images in terms of jawbone position. CONCLUSION: The authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models provide an innovative template-assisted orthognathic surgery planning modality that can enhance the fully digital workflow for virtual orthognathic surgical planning. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach for Correction of Dentofacial Deformity in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported the advantages of the surgery-first approach for orthognathic correction of class III deformity, there is no report of the success of this approach for patients with cleft lip and palate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and outcome of bimaxillary surgery for cleft-related dentofacial deformity using a surgery-first approach. METHODS: Forty-one patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who consecutively underwent Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for skeletal class III deformity were included. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and after orthodontic treatment were used to measure the surgical and postsurgical changes in jaw position by landmarks, and outcomes of jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation after treatment. Self-report questionnaires regarding satisfaction with overall appearance of the face and seven facial regions were administered after treatment. RESULTS: A clinically insignificant relapse was found in the maxilla (<1 mm) and mandible (<2 mm). There was a significant improvement in the jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation. Responses from the self-report questionnaires completed after treatment indicated that patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate surgical-orthodontic treatment with a surgery-first approach can successfully improve cleft-related dentofacial deformity in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Objective assessment of visual attention in orthognathic surgery training based on eye tracking.

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in visual attention between novices and orthognathic experts, as well as to provide evidence for use in developing and optimizing training strategies for orthognathic surgery. Novice and orthognathic experts were recruited, and their distributions of visual attention were monitored via an eye-tracking device while they watched orthognathic surgery videos. The percentages of visual fixation duration devoted to the areas of interest - surgical objects, instruments controlled by the main surgeon, and instruments controlled by the assistants - in each orthognathic surgery section were analyzed and compared between the two groups using repeated-measures factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). In total, there were 18 participants, comprising both novices (n = 9) and experts (n = 9). For all sections of orthognathic surgery, the percentage of fixation duration on surgical objects was significantly higher for the novices than for the experts (p = 0.031, p = 0.005, p = 0.026, p = 0.047, p = 0.047, p = 0.031, p = 0.027, p = 0.034, p = 0.008, and p = 0.016). During the maxillary segment separation as part of Le Fort I osteotomy and the splitting of the mandible as part of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, the novices also had a higher percentage of fixation duration on the instruments controlled by the main surgeon, as compared with the experts (p = 0.007 and p = 0.048, respectively). Novices invested great cognitive effort into the surgical objects in each section of orthognathic surgery, including the instruments controlled by the main surgeon in the maxillary segment separation and the splitting of the mandible. Strengthening this aspect of instruction could help novices reduce their cognitive load and achieve mastery more efficiently.

Does Anesthesiologist Experience Influence Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Orthognathic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia provider experience impacts nausea and vomiting in other surgical specialties but its influence within orthognathic surgery remains unclear. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate whether anesthesiologist experience with orthognathic surgery impacts postoperative outcomes, including nausea, emesis, narcotic use, and perioperative adverse events, for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cohort study of subjects aged 12 to 35 years old who underwent orthognathic surgery, including Le Fort 1 osteotomy ± bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, at Boston Children's Hospital from August 2018 to January 2022. Subjects were excluded if they had incomplete medical records, a syndromic diagnosis, or a hospital stay of greater than 2 days. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was attending anesthesia provider experience with orthognathic surgery. Providers were classified as experienced or inexperienced, with experienced providers defined as having anesthetized ≥10 orthognathic operations during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was postoperative nausea. Secondary outcome variables were emesis, narcotic use in the hospital, and perioperative adverse events within 30 days of their operation. COVARIATES: Study covariates included age, sex, race, comorbidities (body mass index, history of psychiatric illness, cleft lip and/or palate, chronic pain, postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastrointestinal conditions), enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enrollment, and intraoperative factors (operation performed, anesthesia/procedure times, estimated blood loss, intravenous fluid and narcotic administration, and anesthesiologist's years in practice). ANALYSES: χ2 and unpaired t-tests were used to compare primary predictor and covariates against outcome variables. A P-value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 118 subjects included in the study after 4 were excluded (51.7% female, mean age 19.1 ± 3.30 years). There were 71 operations performed by 5 experienced anesthesiologists (mean cases/provider 15.4 ± 5.95) and 47 cases by 22 different inexperienced providers (mean cases/provider 1.91 ± 1.16). The nausea rate was 52.1% for experienced providers and 53.2% for inexperienced providers (P = .909). There were no statistically significant associations between anesthesiologist experience and any outcome variable (P > .341). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anesthesia providers' experience with orthognathic surgery did not significantly influence postoperative nausea, emesis, narcotic use, or perioperative adverse events.

Advantages of a High-Powered Ultrasonic Vibration Cutting Device for Orthognathic Surgeries.

This study aimed to evaluate the advantages of using a high-powered ultrasonic vibration cutting device (HP-UVCD) in orthognathic surgeries. We analyzed 22 consecutive patients who underwent Le FortⅠosteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for cleft lip and palate. We used conventional power instruments, such as reciprocating saws and rotating burrs in the first 10 patients, and an HP-UVCD in the remaining 12 patients. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative inferior alveolar nerve affection were retrospectively investigated. The surgical time in the ultrasonic group (223±12.217 min) was significantly shorter than that in the conventional group (278±11.153 min, P =0.008). The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the ultrasonic group was an average of 230±45.154 g, and that in the conventional group was an average of 343±49.463 g. Although the blood loss in the ultrasonic group was reduced compared with that in the conventional group, this difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.118). All patients in both groups recovered normal sensation by 6 months postoperatively. Our findings suggest that the HP-UVCD can be used in place of a reciprocating saw or rotating burrs in orthognathic surgeries, resulting in reduced surgical time and minimal blood loss. The use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device may allow for a safer and less invasive orthognathic surgery.

Enhancing skeletal stability and Class III correction through active orthodontist engagement in virtual surgical planning: A voxel-based 3-dimensional analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgical correction of Class III malocclusion was investigated through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the distal and proximal mandibular segments using a 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition among virtual surgical predictions performed by the orthodontist in close communication with the maxillofacial surgeon and 12-18 months postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive secondary data analysis was conducted on deidentified preoperative (1 month before surgery [T1]) and 12-18 months postoperative (midterm [T2]) cone-beam computed tomography scans, along with virtual surgical planning (VSP) data obtained by Dolphin Imaging software. The sample for the study consisted of 17 patients (mean age, 24.8 ± 3.5 years). Using 3D Slicer software, automated tools based on deep-learning approaches were used for cone-beam computed tomography orientation, registration, bone segmentation, and landmark identification. Colormaps were generated for qualitative analysis, whereas linear and angular differences between the planned (T1-VSP) and observed (T1-T2) outcomes were calculated for quantitative assessments. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS: The midterm surgical outcomes revealed a slight but significantly less maxillary advancement compared with the planned position (mean difference, 1.84 ± 1.50 mm; P = 0.004). The repositioning of the mandibular distal segment was stable, with insignificant differences in linear (T1-VSP, 1.01 ± 3.66 mm; T1-T2, 0.32 ± 4.17 mm) and angular (T1-VSP, 1.53° ± 1.60°; T1-T2, 1.54° ± 1.50°) displacements (P >0.05). The proximal segments exhibited lateral displacement within 1.5° for both the mandibular right and left ramus at T1-VSP and T1-T2 (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of fully digital planned and surgically repositioned maxilla and mandible revealed excellent precision. In the midterm surgical outcomes of maxillary advancement, a minor deviation from the planned anterior movement was observed.

Does Articular Disc Position Change Following Mandibular Setback Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Maintaining condyle position following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is crucial to minimizing postoperative relapse. However, the impact of BSSO on the articular disc position remains inconclusive. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the changes in articular disc position following setback BSSO surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLING: In this prospective cohort study, subjects with mandibular prognathism requiring setback BSSO were enrolled between August 2021 and June 2022 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Patients with surgical complications, loss of follow-up, or significant artifacts in their MR images were excluded. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: The predictor variable was time. The articular disc position was assessed at 3 time points, preoperatively (T0), 3 months postsurgery (T1), and 6 months postsurgery (T2). MAIN OUTCOME: The primary and secondary outcome variables were the changes in articular disc position between T0-T2 and T0-T1, respectively. Articular disc position was coded as normal, anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR), anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR), and anterior disc displacement without reduction and degenerative joint disease (ADDwoR + DJD). COVARIATES: Covariate variables collected included age (years), sex (male or female), asymmetry (present or absent), surgical procedure (single jaw (BSSO) or bimaxillary surgery), and setback distance (millimeters). ANALYSES: Friedman's test with 80% power and a significance level of 0.05 was employed. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc test to identify statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The study included 16 subjects, 6 females and 10 males, with a total of 32 TMJs. Subjects had a mean age of 23.75 (4.57) years. The proportion of TMJs with normal disc position postoperatively increased from 3 (9.4%) to 19 (59.4%). Statistically significant differences were found in the changes in disc position over time (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Following setback BSSO, the articular discs underwent changes, with a majority of ADDwR cases transitioning to a normal position. Cases with ADDwoR also demonstrated disc reduction capability after surgery. The combined orthodontic treatment and setback BSSO appear to have an effect on articular disc position in skeleton class III patients.

[Three-dimensional comparative study on the stability of bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty and simple genioplasty].

PURPOSE: To establish a three-dimensional method to evaluate whether there is a difference in stability between bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty and simple genioplasty. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study. Sixty patients who underwent genioplasty were selected. They were divided into bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty group (n=30) and simple genioplasty group (n=30). The spiral CT data of patients at 2 months before operation (T0), 7 days after operation (T1) and 12 months after operation (T2) were collected, reconstructed and separated, and the three-dimensional model of maxilla and mandible was obtained. A three-dimensional analysis method of stability was established by 3D-matching. Recurrences in three-dimensional space 12 months after surgery were analyzed in two groups of patients. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with SPSS 26.0 software package. RESULTS: In simple genioplasty, the maximum amount of the chin recurrence was sagittal backward recurrence (0.54±0.38) mm, and the sagittal recurrence rate was 12.27%. In bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty, the maximum amount of the chin recurrence was sagittal backward recurrence (0.60±0.31) mm, and the sagittal recurrence rate was 12.96%. Rotation occurred in both groups 12 months after operation, which was 1.98±2.70° in the simple genioplasty group and 1.01±1.61° in the bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty group(P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the sagittal movement of the chin between the two groups, and in the sagittal recurrence(P＞0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional method established in this study can be used to evaluate the stability after genioplasty. The recurrence after genioplasty mainly occurred in the sagittal direction. The rotation trend of chin after genioplasty is worthy of attention. There was no increased risk for bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty.

Anatomical Conditions in Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery and Structural Rhinoplasty. A Clinical Series / Condiciones Anatómicas en Cirugía Ortognática y Rinoplastia Estructural Simultanea. Una Seria Clínica

SUMMARY: Orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty show synergy in terms of function and aesthetic results. The aim of this research is to analyze variables related to simultaneous orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty and to discuss the surgical sequence. Male and female subjects between 18 and 45 years old were included in this research. Diagnosis related to nasal morphology (nasal tip bifid, rotate, square and others as well as the alae morphology and columella), facial deformity (sagittal and vertical deformity), type of surgery (rhinoplasty techniques and orthognathic techniques) and complications were included. The minimum follow-up was 12 months; Chi- Square and t test were used to define correlations, considering a value of p<0.05 for statistical significance. Class III facial deformity was observed in 40 % of subjects and class II facial deformity was present in 43 %. For the nasal deformities, the tip and nasal bridge were most prevalent; primary nasal deformity was observed in the 83 % of subjects and was significant more than secondary nasal deformity (p=0.042). Bimaxillary surgery was performed in 31 cases (88 %). In 10 cases a change of the original plan for rhinoplasty due to previous maxillary surgery was realized, mainly in class III facial deformity, with no statistical differences. Revision rhinoplasty was realized in 5 cases (14 %) and was not related to surgical variables; revision for orthognathic surgery was not necessary in this series. Rhinoplasty and orthognathic surgery simultaneously show low complications and predictable results. We can conclude that maxillary mandibular osteotomies and rhinoplasty could be performed safely. However, larger studies are necessary to understand the best choice and variables involved in simultaneous procedures and soft tissue response.

La cirugía ortognática y la rinoplastia muestran sinergia en términos de resultados funcionales y estéticos. EL objetivo de esta investigación es analizar variables relacionadas con la cirugía ortognática y rinoplastia ejecutada de forma simultanea. Fueron incluidos hombres y mujeres entre 18 y 45 años de edad. EL diagnóstico fue en base a la morfología nasal (punta bífida, rotada, cuadrada u otras así como alteraciones del ala nasal y columela), deformidad facial (deformidad sagital y vertical), tipo de cirugía (técnica de rinoplastia y cirugía ortognática) y complicaciones asociadas. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 12 meses; se utilizo las prueba t test y chi cuadrado para definir relaciones estadísticas considerando un valor de p< 0,05 para obtener diferencias significativas. La deformidad clase III fue observada en el 40 % de los sujetos y la deformidad facial de clase II se presento en el 43 %. Para la deformidad nasal, las alteraciones de a punta nasal y nasal fueron mas prevalentes; la deformidad nasal primaria se presentó en el 83 % de los sujetos y fue significativamente mayor que la deformidad nasal secundaria (p=0,042). La cirugía bimaxilar se realizó en 31 casos (88 %); en 10 casos se realizó el cambio del plan quirúrgico inicial de la rinoplastia debido a cambios generados en la cirugía maxilar previa, mayormente en deformidad facial de clase III, sin presentar diferencias significativas. La rinoplastia de revisión fue realizada en 5 casos (14 %) y no fue relacionada con ninguna variable de tipo quirúrgica; la revisión de cirugía ortognática no fue realizada en ningún caso de esta serie. La rinoplastia y la cirugía ortognática simultanea mostraron bajas complicaciones y resultados predecibles. Se puede concluir que la osteotomía maxilo mandibular y la rinoplastia son seguras; sin embargo, estudios de mayor volumen son necesarios para entender la mejor opción y variables relacionadas con procedimientos simultáneos y la respuesta de tejidos blandos faciales.

Successful rehabilitation after multiple severe complications following orthognathic surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Complications of orthognathic surgery are quite rare, but they cause suffering in affected individuals. The range of complications is broad and includes both hard and soft tissue. CASE PRESENTATION: We here present a case of a fully healthy woman without signs of impaired healing capacity. The patient underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and experienced multiple complications both peri- and post-operatively. During the post operative period, the patient also suffered from soft tissue complications after an orthopaedic injury. Therefore, we referred the patient to her general practitioner for further medical investigation. We also present the result after restorative surgery and endodontic and prosthodontic treatment resulting in a successful rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: This case report clearly shows the need for a good collaboration between different odontological and medical fields to achieve a good and predictable result. In situations where normal healing processes do not occur, in-depth analysis must be carried out. HIGHLIGHTS: Orthognathic surgery affects soft and hard tissue which can result in adverse healing and complications. It is of great importance to follow up performed surgery to see late complications. Be restrictive with early re-operations when there are signs of necrosis. Always use a multidisciplinary approach when handling complications after surgery.

Soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: Improving accuracy by means of anatomical details.

Three-dimensional virtual simulation of orthognathic surgery is now a well-established method in maxillo-facial surgery. The commercial software packages are still burdened by a consistent imprecision on soft tissue predictions. In this study, the authors produced an anatomically detailed patient specific numerical model for simulation of soft tissue changes in orthognathic surgery. Eight patients were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent CBCT and planar x-rays prior to surgery and in addition received an MRI scan. Postoperative soft-tissue change was simulated using Finite Element Modeling (FEM) relying on a patient-specific 3D models generated combining data from preoperative CBCT (hard tissue) scans and MRI scans (muscles and skin). An initial simulation was performed assuming that all the muscles and the other soft tissue had the same material properties (Homogeneous Model). This model was compared with the postoperative CBCT 3D simulation for validation purpose. Design of experiments (DoE) was used to assess the effect of the presence of the muscles considered and of their variation in stiffness. The effect of single muscles was evaluated in specific areas of the midface. The quantitative distance error between the homogeneous model and actual patient surfaces for the midface area was 0.55 mm, standard deviation 2.9 mm. In our experience, including muscles in the numerical simulation of orthognathic surgery, brought an improvement in the quality of the simulation obtained.

Body mass index and weight loss in patients submitted to orthognathic surgery: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the body mass index (BMI) and the weight loss (WL) in patients with dentofacial deformities who underwent monomaxillary versus bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included 69 patients with dentofacial deformities who underwent surgical orthodontic treatment. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of orthognathic surgery: monomaxillary or bimaxillary. A preoperative nutritional assessment based on BMI was performed; the percentage of involuntary WL between the preoperative and postoperative periods was also calculated. Data were collected at preoperative and 10, 40, and 90 days postoperative (PO). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and data are reported with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: According to BMI, patients who underwent monomaxillary surgery presented: underweight = 2.6%, normal weight = 51.3%, overweight = 35.9%, and obese = 10.3%. The subjects who underwent bimaxillary surgery presented: normal weight = 43.3%, overweight = 36.7%, and obese = 20%. BMI was similar between the groups at all time points (preoperative, p= 0.237; 10 days PO, p= 0.325; 40 days PO, p= 0.430; and 90 days PO, p= 0.609). All patients lost weight postoperatively, and WL was similar among the PO measurements (p= 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: Although both monomaxillary and bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries resulted in WL and lower BMI, there was no statistically significant difference in these metrics between the two types of surgery.