Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26.684
Filtrar
1.
ARP Rheumatol ; 3(2): 145-150, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956996

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients being on immunosuppressive treatment of any reason, along with other risk factors such as smoking and obesity, are vulnerable to be infected from SARS-CoV2. Aim of this report is to describe a case of a female patient under Rituximab therapy who experienced episodes of lung infection due to Severe Acute Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 ) invasion although fully vaccinated. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman, with a past medical history of lupus nephritis on rituximab was diagnosed with lung infection due to SARS-CoV-2. Eight months later, following her last infusion of Rituximab (RTX), she developed moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). After a partial recovery, she exhibited exacerbation of respiratory symptoms leading to readmission and invasive oxygenation. She was eventually discharged home after 31 days. Her monthly neurological evaluation did not reveal evidence of disease activity. She later received intravenous immunoglobulin and a decision was made to restart rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: This case raises the possibility of persistent virus shedding and reactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in a patient with SLE and Rituximab therapy. We emphasize a precise consideration of management of patients with autoimmune disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Rituximab , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Femenino , COVID-19/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1356938, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948529

RESUMEN

Introduction: Studies on the effect of vaccine type and two other vaccines other than inactivated vaccines approved in China on in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes are rare. To complement and confirm the existing findings, this research aimed to investigate whether there are adverse effects of different vaccine types in females and males on reproductive function and clinical pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 6,455 fresh embryo transfer cycles at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between May 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. The primary outcome is the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). At the same time, the secondary results are the number of oocytes retrieved, two pronuclei (2PN) rate, blastocyst formation rate, high-quality blastocyst rate, and semen parameters (volume, density, sperm count, forward motility rate, total motility rate, immobility rate, and DNA fragment index (DFI) rate). Results: In the comparison of ovarian stimulation indicators, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in Gn days, endometrial thickness, 2PN rate, metaphase 2 (MII) rate, high-quality embryo rate, and blastocyst formation rate. No significant differences (P>0.05) were found in age, body mass index (BMI), education level, and semen parameters (volume, density, sperm count, forward motility rate, total motility rate, immobility rate, and DFI rate) in these four groups. The multivariate regression model showed that neither the types of vaccines nor the vaccination status of both infertile couples significantly affected clinical pregnancy. Discussion: The type of vaccine does not appear to have an unfavorable effect on ovarian stimulation, embryo development, semen parameters, and clinical pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infertilidad , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Reproducción/fisiología , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , China/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(7): 1047-1051, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950295

RESUMEN

A vaccine law and policy expert reflects on the dangers of the influence of politics on public health decision making.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Política , Humanos , Vacunas , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos , Toma de Decisiones , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Formulación de Políticas
4.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(7): 979-984, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950301

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 Uninsured Program, administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), reimbursed providers for administering COVID-19 vaccines to uninsured US adults from December 11, 2020, through April 5, 2022. Using HRSA claims data covering forty-two states, we estimated that the program funded about 38.9 million COVID-19 vaccine doses, accounting for 5.7 percent of total doses distributed and 10.9 percent of doses administered to adults ages 19-64.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pacientes no Asegurados , Humanos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , United States Health Resources and Services Administration , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2 , Programas de Inmunización/economía
5.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2829: 185-194, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951334

RESUMEN

Insect cell expression has been successfully used for the production of viral antigens as part of commercial vaccine development. As expression host, insect cells offer advantage over bacterial system by presenting the ability of performing post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as glycosylation and phosphorylation thus preserving the native functionality of the proteins especially for viral antigens. Insect cells have limitation in exactly mimicking some proteins which require complex glycosylation pattern. The recent advancement in insect cell engineering strategies could overcome this limitation to some extent. Moreover, cost efficiency, timelines, safety, and process adoptability make insect cells a preferred platform for production of subunit antigens for human and animal vaccines. In this chapter, we describe the method for producing the SARS-CoV2 spike ectodomain subunit antigen for human vaccine development and the virus like particle (VLP), based on capsid protein of porcine circovirus virus 2 (PCV2d) antigen for animal vaccine development using two different insect cell lines, SF9 & Hi5, respectively. This methodology demonstrates the flexibility and broad applicability of insect cell as expression host.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Virales , Baculoviridae , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Animales , Baculoviridae/genética , Antígenos Virales/genética , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Células Sf9 , Humanos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Línea Celular , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunas de Partículas Similares a Virus/genética , Vacunas de Partículas Similares a Virus/inmunología , Vacunas de Partículas Similares a Virus/biosíntesis , Proteínas de la Cápside/genética , Proteínas de la Cápside/inmunología , Glicosilación , Insectos/genética , Spodoptera , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/genética , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1398002, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947322

RESUMEN

Background: In the present study we investigated whether peptides derived from the entire SARS-CoV-2 proteome share homology to TAAs (tumor-associated antigens) and cross-reactive CD8+ T cell can be elicited by the BNT162b2 preventive vaccine or the SARS-CoV-2 natural infection. Methods and results: Viral epitopes with high affinity (<100nM) to the HLA-A*02:01 allele were predicted. Shared and variant-specific epitopes were identified. Significant homologies in amino acidic sequence have been found between SARS-CoV-2 peptides and multiple TAAs, mainly associated with breast, liver, melanoma and colon cancers. The molecular mimicry of the viral epitopes and the TAAs was found in all viral proteins, mostly the Orf 1ab and the Spike, which is included in the BNT162b2 vaccine. Predicted structural similarities confirmed the sequence homology and comparable patterns of contact with both HLA and TCR α and ß chains were observed. CD8+ T cell clones cross-reactive with the paired peptides have been found by MHC class l-dextramer staining. Conclusions: Our results show for the first time that several SARS-COV-2 antigens are highly homologous to TAAs and cross-reactive T cells are identified in infected and BNT162b2 preventive vaccinated individuals. The implication would be that the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic could represent a natural preventive immunization for breast, liver, melanoma and colon cancers. In the coming years, real-world evidences will provide the final proof for such immunological experimental evidence. Moreover, such SARS-CoV-2 epitopes can be used to develop "multi-cancer" off-the-shelf preventive/therapeutic vaccine formulations, with higher antigenicity and immunogenicity than over-expressed tumor self-antigens, for the potential valuable benefit of thousands of cancer patients around the World.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , COVID-19 , Reacciones Cruzadas , Epítopos de Linfocito T , Imitación Molecular , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Imitación Molecular/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Epítopos de Linfocito T/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Antígeno HLA-A2/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2419258, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949812

RESUMEN

Importance: In the context of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants or lineages and new vaccines, it is key to accurately monitor COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (CVE) to inform vaccination campaigns. Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered in autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (with all circulating viruses and XBB lineage in particular) among people aged 60 years or older in Europe, and to compare different CVE approaches across the exposed and reference groups used. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study obtained data from VEBIS (Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies), a multicenter study that collects COVID-19 and influenza data from 11 European sites: Croatia; France; Germany; Hungary; Ireland; Portugal; the Netherlands; Romania; Spain, national; Spain, Navarre region; and Sweden. Participants were primary care patients aged 60 years or older with acute respiratory infection symptoms who were recruited at the 11 sites after the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign from September 2022 to August 2023. Cases and controls were defined as patients with positive and negative, respectively, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results. Exposures: The exposure was COVID-19 vaccination. The exposure group consisted of patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine during the autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 vaccination campaign and 14 days or more before symptom onset. Reference group included patients who were not vaccinated during or in the 6 months before the 2022 to 2023 campaign (seasonal CVE), those who were never vaccinated (absolute CVE), and those who were vaccinated with at least the primary series 6 months or more before the campaign (relative CVE). For relative CVE of second boosters, patients receiving their second booster during the campaign were compared with those receiving 1 booster 6 months or more before the campaign. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed, medically attended, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Four CVE estimates were generated: seasonal, absolute, relative, and relative of second boosters. CVE was estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for study site, symptom onset date, age, chronic condition, and sex. Results: A total of 9308 primary care patients were included, with 1687 cases (1035 females; median [IQR] age, 71 [65-79] years) and 7621 controls (4619 females [61%]; median [IQR] age, 71 [65-78] years). Within 14 to 89 days after vaccination, seasonal CVE was 29% (95% CI, 14%-42%), absolute CVE was 39% (95% CI, 6%-60%), relative CVE was 31% (95% CI, 15% to 44%), and relative CVE of second boosters was 34% (95% CI, 18%-47%) against all SARS-CoV-2 variants. In the same interval, seasonal CVE was 44% (95% CI, -10% to 75%), absolute CVE was 52% (95% CI, -23% to 82%), relative CVE was 47% (95% CI, -8% to 77%), and relative CVE of second boosters was 46% (95% CI, -13% to 77%) during a period of high XBB circulation. Estimates decreased with time since vaccination, with no protection from 180 days after vaccination. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study among older Europeans, all CVE approaches suggested that COVID-19 vaccines administered in autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 offered at least 3 months of protection against symptomatic, medically attended, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of new COVID-19 vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants should be continually monitored using CVE seasonal approaches.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Estaciones del Año , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblo Europeo
8.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1751, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At the time of the emergence of COVID-19, denialist and anti-vaccine groups have also emerged and are shaking public confidence in vaccination. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using online focus groups. Participants had not received any doses of vaccination against the disease. A total of five focus group sessions were conducted with 28 participants. They were recruited by snowball sampling and by convenience sampling. RESULTS: The two major topics mentioned by the participants were adverse effects and information. The adverse effects described were severe and included sudden death. In the case of information, participants reported: (1) consultation of websites on which scientists posted anti-vaccination content; and (2) distrust. CONCLUSIONS: At a time when anti-vaccine groups pose a major challenge to public health in general, and to COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in particular, this study is a first step towards gaining deeper insight into the factors that lead to COVID-19 vaccine refusal.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Grupos Focales , Investigación Cualitativa , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Negativa a la Vacunación , Humanos , España , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento Anti-Vacunación/psicología , Anciano , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Ethiop J Health Sci ; 34(1): 105-109, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957337

RESUMEN

The National Immunization Program (NIP) was introduced in Ethiopia in 1980. The NIP has expanded the number of vaccines from six to more than 14 in 2023. However, decisions on new vaccine introduction and other vaccine-related matters were not systematically deliberated nationally. Thus, the need to establish a national body to deliberate on vaccine and vaccination matters, in addition to the global immunization advisory groups, has been emphasized in the last decade. This article presents the establishment and achievements of the Ethiopian NITAG. The E-NITAG was established in 2016 and maintained its active role in providing recommendations for new vaccine introduction and improving the delivery of routine vaccines. The external assessment indicated the E-NITAG was highly functional and played a critical role in enhancing the vaccination practice in Ethiopia, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The absence of a dedicated secretariat staff was the major bottleneck to expanding the role of the E-NITAG beyond responding to MOH requests. The E-NITAG must be strengthened by establishing a secretariat that can eventually grow as an independent institution to address complex vaccine-related issues the NIP needs to address.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , COVID-19 , Programas de Inmunización , Humanos , Etiopía , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas/administración & dosificación
10.
FASEB J ; 38(13): e23814, 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959046

RESUMEN

As we enter a new era of mRNA-based therapeutics, evidence on genetic or environmental factors that might predispose to unknown off-target side effects, gains in importance. Among these factors, exercise appears likely to have influenced otherwise cryptic cases of early-onset postvaccination myocarditis. And the existence of a distinct late-onset myocarditis is now being recognized. Here, three case-history reports suggest crypticity (the author's own case), unless provoked by a preexisting cardiac morbidity (one case), or by immune checkpoint blockade to enhance anticancer autoimmunity (several cases). These reports are supported by noninvasive fluorodeoxyglucose-based cardiac scan comparisons of multiple vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects. In pre-pandemic decades, applications for funds by the leading innovator in mRNA-based therapeutics seldom gained peer-review approval. Thus, at the start of the pandemic, the meager data on such side effects could justify only emergency approval. We must do better.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miocarditis , Vacunación , Miocarditis/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Femenino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto
11.
Annu Rev Biomed Eng ; 26(1): 273-306, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959389

RESUMEN

Nanomaterials are becoming important tools for vaccine development owing to their tunable and adaptable nature. Unique properties of nanomaterials afford opportunities to modulate trafficking through various tissues, complement or augment adjuvant activities, and specify antigen valency and display. This versatility has enabled recent work designing nanomaterial vaccines for a broad range of diseases, including cancer, inflammatory diseases, and various infectious diseases. Recent successes of nanoparticle vaccines during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have fueled enthusiasm further. In this review, the most recent developments in nanovaccines for infectious disease, cancer, inflammatory diseases, allergic diseases, and nanoadjuvants are summarized. Additionally, challenges and opportunities for clinical translation of this unique class of materials are discussed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nanoestructuras , SARS-CoV-2 , Desarrollo de Vacunas , Humanos , Nanoestructuras/química , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/química , Animales , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/química , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Nanopartículas/química , Vacunas , Pandemias/prevención & control
12.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(2)2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959927

RESUMEN

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a multi-organ idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that presents with proximal symmetric muscle weakness accompanied by characteristic cutaneous findings. Most individuals present with skin manifestations prior to muscle involvement and its course can involve the blood vessels, joints, esophagus, and lungs and can be paraneoplastic, making a malignancy assessment imperative. Although its etiology is unknown, type I interferon appears to be a component in evoking the characteristic inflammatory response and patients with DM often have an increase in type I inducible genes. Suspected triggers for DM are environmental factors, drugs, viral infections, and vaccines. The association of DM with vaccination poses a new conundrum within the medical community as people continue to get vaccinated and boosted with SARS-CoV2 vaccines, though it is worth noting that the most common challenges arose as type I hypersensitivity reactions and new onset autoimmune disorders are rare. Presented here is a 53-year-old man who was diagnosed with DM after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. His case highlights the importance of the potential onset of autoimmune diseases following the COVID-19 vaccine, a phenomenon that clinicians should be aware of as the discourse concerning the pandemic continues.


Asunto(s)
Dermatomiositis , Humanos , Dermatomiositis/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control
13.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(2)2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959931

RESUMEN

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) involves recurrent, pruritic wheals lasting more than 6 weeks in response to various etiologies, including unknown causality. Though most cutaneous reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine series are self-limited and of short duration, more complex presentations including chronic spontaneous urticaria have been described. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of chronic spontaneous urticaria following heterologous mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination that includes vaccination with both forms of the mRNA vaccine. Our patient received Pfizer-BioNTech for the primary series and Moderna for the booster. After failing several therapies, our patient's urticaria was refractory even to omalizumab. The source for chronic spontaneous urticaria development in our patient may be related to the unique humoral response elicited by receipt of a different mRNA vaccine manufacturer.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Urticaria Crónica , Inmunización Secundaria , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Inmunización Secundaria/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Femenino , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Adulto
14.
J Law Med ; 31(2): 225-243, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963244

RESUMEN

Over recent years, dozens of legal challenges have been instituted in response to government action during the COVID-19 pandemic. While public health orders have been challenged on several grounds, few cases have succeeded. Fewer cases still have called into question decisions made by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to approve the COVID-19 vaccines. This section provides a brief update on one recent, partially successful COVID-19 health directions case before examining two applications in the Federal Court of Australia seeking judicial review of the TGA's approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. The section argues that, while both TGA applications were dismissed for lack of standing, they illustrate how and why third parties will ordinarily not be entitled to challenge administrative decisions about therapeutic goods.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Aprobación de Drogas , Pandemias , Humanos , Australia , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación Obligatoria
15.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 19(1): 247, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is still unclear. This study investigates COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccine safety and efficacy, and COVID-19 symptoms in LAM patients. RESULTS: In total, 181 LAM patients and 143 healthy individuals responded to the questionnaire. The vaccination rate of LAM patients was 77.34%, and 15.7% of vaccinated LAM patients experienced adverse events. Vaccination decreased the risk of LAM patients developing anorexia [OR: 0.17, 95% CI: (0.07, 0.43)], myalgia [OR: 0.34, 95% CI: (0.13, 0.84)], and ageusia [OR: 0.34, 95% CI: (0.14, 0.84)]. In LAM patients, a use of mTOR inhibitors reduced the risk of developing symptoms during COVID-19, including fatigue [OR: 0.18, 95% CI: (0.03, 0.95)], anorexia [OR: 0.30, 95% CI: (0.09, 0.96)], and ageusia [OR: 0.20, 95% CI: (0.06, 0.67)]. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination rates in the LAM population were lower than those in the general population, as 22.7% (41/181) of LAM patients had hesitations regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. However, the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in the LAM cohort was comparable to the healthy population, and COVID-19 vaccination decreased the incidence of COVID-19 symptoms in LAM patients. In addition, mTOR inhibitors seem not to determine a greater risk of complications in patients with LAM during COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Linfangioleiomiomatosis , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , China/epidemiología , Pueblos del Este de Asia
16.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(7): e1270, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants and the global COVID-19 pandemic spurred urgent vaccine development. While common vaccine side effects are well-documented, rare adverse events necessitate post-marketing surveillance. Recent research linked messenger RNA vaccines to thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), a group of syndromes characterized by microvascular hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. This report describes a new-onset atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) occurring after COVID-19 vaccination and complements recent literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy 25-year-old woman developed malaise, nausea, edema, and renal dysfunction 60 days postvaccination. Laboratory findings confirmed TMA diagnosis. Genetic testing for complement system mutations was negative. Kidney biopsy supported the diagnosis, and the patient required hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the rare occurrence of aHUS following COVID-19 vaccination, with unique characteristics compared to previous reports. Despite the critical role of vaccination in pandemic control, emerging adverse events, such as vaccine-related TMA, must be recognized and investigated. Additional clinical trials are imperative to comprehend the clinical features and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying TMA associated with COVID-19 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal , Vacunación/efectos adversos
17.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0302332, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968176

RESUMEN

Vaccination against COVID-19 can prevent severe illness and reduce hospitalizations and deaths. Understanding and addressing determinants contributing to vaccine uptake among high-risk groups, such as Latinos, are pivotal in ensuring equitable vaccine distribution, promoting health equity, and fostering community engagement to bridge the gap in vaccine acceptance and ultimately enhance public health. This study aimed to examine factors influencing vaccine uptake among Latinos. We conducted a cross-sectional study using an online platform (n = 242). The survey was administered using a multimodal approach. Strategies for recruitment included community outreach, social media, and targeting community networks serving Latinos. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariable analysis were performed. Overall, 81.4% of respondents had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with 77.0% recommending it and 70.6% believing it to be safe, 66.7% believing in its efficacy, 62.3% able to find trustful information in Spanish or Portuguese, and almost 40% who relied on health organizations as their primary resource for COVID-19 vaccine information. Factors significantly associated with vaccine uptake included higher education level (p<0.001), English level (p = 0.023), living in an urban area (p = 0.048), having insurance (p<0.001), and having a healthcare provider (p = 0.007). Furthermore, belief in vaccine safety and efficacy, trust in public health authorities, concerns about COVID-19, the ability to determine true/false vaccine information during the pandemic, and the availability of trustworthy information in Spanish/Portuguese had statistically significant associations (p<0.05) with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. COVID-19 vaccine uptake differed based on sociodemographic and other modifiable factors. Our findings emphasize the importance of implementing targeted interventions and culturally sensitive communication strategies to improve vaccination uptake among the Latino community in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adulto , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Anciano , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología
18.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0292143, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968187

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to map the existing literature to identify predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among refugees, immigrants, and other migrant populations. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, APA PsycInfo and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) was conducted up to 31 January 2023 to identify the relevant English peer-reviewed observational studies. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, selected studies, and extracted data. RESULTS: We identified 34 cross-sectional studies, primarily conducted in high income countries (76%). Lower vaccine acceptance was associated with mistrust in the host countries' government and healthcare system, concerns about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, limited knowledge of COVID-19 infection and vaccines, lower COVID-19 risk perception, and lower integration level in the host country. Female gender, younger age, lower education level, and being single were associated with lower vaccine acceptance in most studies. Additionally, sources of information about COVID-19 and vaccines and previous history of COVID-19 infection, also influence vaccine acceptance. Vaccine acceptability towards COVID-19 booster doses and various vaccine brands were not adequately studied. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy and a lack of trust in COVID-19 vaccines have become significant public health concerns within migrant populations. These findings may help in providing information for current and future vaccine outreach strategies among migrant populations.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Refugiados , Migrantes , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Humanos , Refugiados/psicología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Migrantes/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(27): e38809, 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968522

RESUMEN

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), viral infection can lead to antibody and/or T-cell mediated rejection, resulting in kidney transplant dysfunction. Therefore, it is critical to prevent infections. However, KTRs exhibit suboptimal responses to SARS-CoV-2 and/or influenza vaccines, partly due to immunosuppressant therapy. Inter- and intra-individual differences in the biological responses to vaccines may also affect patients' antibody production ability. This study included KTRs who received an messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (3 doses), and an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (1 or 2 doses). We measured the patients' total antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen, and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers against influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria. Five patients were eligible for this study. Of these 5 KTRs, two produced anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers to a seroprotective level, and also produced HI titers against A/H1N1 to a seroprotective level. Another 2 KTRs did not produce seroprotective anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, but produced seroprotective HI titers against A/H1N1. The remaining KTR produced a seroprotective anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer, but did not produce a seroprotective HI titer against A/H1N1. The 2 KTRs who did not produce seroprotective anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers following vaccination, later developed COVID-19, and this infection increased their titers over the seroprotective level. This study demonstrated that inter- and intra-individual differences in biological responses to vaccines should be considered in pediatric KTRs, in addition to immunosuppressant effects. Personalized regimens, such as augmented or booster doses of vaccines, could potentially improve the vaccination efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Trasplante de Riñón , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Niño , Adolescente , Receptores de Trasplantes , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA