RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: With continued demand for health science institutions to find solutions to deliver on heightened student expectations despite smaller budgets and fewer resources, the utilization of organizational improvement techniques is pervasive. Academic health care leaders are seeking effective modalities to overcome obstacles, modernize, and become more efficient. Three of the commonly used approaches for improvement are strategic planning, strategic thinking, and continuous process improvement (CPI), and these concepts have been used in a variety of forms throughout industry, higher education, and health care. However, their definitions are often not well understood, and their processes are misconstrued in practice. With the increased expectation of health care institutions with undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education to consider strategic processes in organizational improvement, it is important for leadership to understand the differences in these three approaches. In this article, we explain the concepts of strategic planning, strategic thinking, and CPI through an overview of their history, definitions, and the benefits and pitfalls as observed by researchers. Furthermore, we reduce the noise in the existing literature into three concise definitions for each approach. And finally, for those seeking where to begin, we explain one tool in each category recommended for the novice strategist: the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for strategic planning, the Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Tactics (GOST) framework for strategic thinking, and the Pareto Chart for CPI.
RESUMEN
In 2020, the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine hired its first civilian dean since its founding in 1918, tasked with building the school's first strategic plan to modernize and improve the institution. Using a combination of military continuous process improvement and academic strategic thinking, the dean produced a highly successful strategic plan. However, its resource-heavy and time-consuming methodology made it difficult to replicate. This study aimed to create a novel and streamlined strategic planning model that combined best practices from continuous process improvement and strategic thinking without redundancy. A qualitative descriptive case study was used to analyze the detailed efforts through content analysis of 150 pages of documentation. A hybrid approach to coding uncovered 44 deductive codes and 5 inductive codes from 10 strategic tools. Results indicated a converging relationship between all strategic processes tested-strategic planning, strategic thinking, and continuous process improvement and their associated tools. A five-step model called the Triple "O" OODA Loop was created, combining best practice tools from strategic planning (purpose trident and SWOT analysis or strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats), strategic thinking (Hot Spots scale and GOST framework or goals, objectives, strategies, and tactics) and continuous process improvement (phases 6-8).
Asunto(s)
Medicina Militar , Humanos , Medicina Militar/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Educación Médica/métodos , Pensamiento , Planificación Estratégica , Estados Unidos , Gestión de la Calidad TotalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe patient-specific factors predictive of surgical delay in elective surgical cases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively from the electronic health record of 32,818 patients who underwent surgery at a large academic hospital in Los Angeles between May 2012 and April 2017. Following bivariate analysis of patient-specific factors and surgical delay, statistically significant predictors were entered into a logistic regression model to determine the most significant predictors of surgical delay. FINDINGS: Predictors of delay included having monitored anesthesia care (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.20-1.36), American Society of Anesthesiologist class 3 or above (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.28), African American race (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39), renal failure (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32), steroid medication (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23) and Medicaid (OR,1.18; 95%CI, 1.09-1.30) or medicare insurance (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21). Six surgical specialties also increased the odds of delay. Obesity and cardiovascular anesthesia decreased the odds of delay. CONCLUSIONS: Certain patient-specific factors including type of insurance, health status, and race were associated with surgical delay. Whereas monitored anesthesia care anesthesia was predictive of a delay, cardiovascular anesthesia reduced the odds of delay. Additionally, obese patients were less likely to experience a delay. While the electronic health record provided a large amount of detailed information, barriers existed to accessing meaningful data.
Asunto(s)
Medicare , Quirófanos , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos ElectivosRESUMEN
The Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society recently published Part I of the 2022 clinical practice guidelines on varicose veins. Recommendations were based on the latest scientific evidence researched following an independent systematic review and meta-analysis of five critical issues affecting the management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins, using the patients, interventions, comparators, and outcome system to answer critical questions. Part I discussed the role of duplex ultrasound scanning in the evaluation of varicose veins and treatment of superficial truncal reflux. Part II focuses on evidence supporting the prevention and management of varicose vein patients with compression, on treatment with drugs and nutritional supplements, on evaluation and treatment of varicose tributaries, on superficial venous aneurysms, and on the management of complications of varicose veins and their treatment. All guidelines were based on systematic reviews, and they were graded according to the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using the GRADE method. All ungraded Consensus Statements were supported by an extensive literature review and the unanimous agreement of an expert, multidisciplinary panel. Ungraded Good Practice Statements are recommendations that are supported only by indirect evidence. The topic, however, is usually noncontroversial and agreed upon by most stakeholders. The Implementation Remarks contain technical information that supports the implementation of specific recommendations. This comprehensive document includes a list of all recommendations (Parts I-II), ungraded consensus statements, implementation remarks, and best practice statements to aid practitioners with appropriate, up-to-date management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Várices , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Insuficiencia Venosa/etiología , Radiología Intervencionista , Escleroterapia/métodos , Vena Safena/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Extremidad InferiorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma is the leading cause of death among persons aged 1-44 years. Trauma recidivism occurs when an individual experiences more than one significant injury in a 5-year period. The relationship between a trauma recidivist's perception of recurrent injury has been unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between select sociodemographic and clinical variables, threat orientation, and the perceived likelihood of recurrent injury of individuals recently experiencing a significant injury. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with Level II trauma inpatients ( n = 84) in Southern California from October 2021 to January 2022. Participants completed surveys prior to discharge. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS: The trauma recidivism rate was 31%. Mental illness and length of hospital stay were associated with trauma recidivism. In individuals with two or more mental illness diagnoses, the odds of trauma recidivism were approximately 6.5 times higher than in those with no mental illness (odds ratio = 6.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-24.6). CONCLUSION: Trauma is a preventable health care concern with timely recognition of risk factors and intervention. This study confirms mental illness as a predominant factor in injury and should be addressed in clinical practice. This study builds upon previous research and emphasizes the necessity of targeting injury prevention and education in the mentally ill. Trauma providers seeking to practice with an upstream mentality have a responsibility in screening patients for mental illness to help prevent further injury and death.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Oportunidad RelativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the current strategies of endovascular and laparoscopic extravascular stenting for symptomatic compression of the left renal vein (LRV), most frequently between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (nutcracker syndrome [NCS]). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all studies of endovascular and laparoscopic extravascular LRV stenting for NCS using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, and Epistemonikos databases. Data were collected in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) guidelines. The English, Spanish, and German language literature was searched from January 1, 1946 to February 9, 2022. The outcomes assessed included symptom resolution, hematuria resolution, and reintervention at follow-up. RESULTS: The search yielded 3498 reports. After removing the duplicates and those without the full text available, 1724 studies were screened. Of these, 11 studies were included in the present review. Of the 11 studies, 7 were on endovascular stenting and 4 on laparoscopic extravascular stenting; all 11 studies were retrospective, single-center case series. Of the 233 patients, 170 (80 women) had undergone endovascular stenting and 63 (9 women) had undergone extravascular stenting. The follow-up period varied from 1 to 60 months after endovascular stenting and 3 to 55 months after extravascular stenting. The symptoms had resolved in 76% (range, 50%-100%) after endovascular stenting and 83% (range, 71%-100%) after extravascular stenting. Hematuria had resolved in 86% (range, 60%-100%) after endovascular stenting and 89% (range, 77%-100%) after extravascular stenting. Of 185 patients, 9 had required reintervention after endovascular stenting and none after extravascular stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular and laparoscopic extravascular stenting are less invasive and, thus, more attractive treatment options that have been more recently developed for the management of NCS. The results from the present study have shown that symptom and hematuria resolution must be provided before they can be considered preferred management options for patients affected by NCS. Given the limited number of patients involved, no definitive conclusion could be drawn regarding the superiority of one technique compared with the other.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hematuria/cirugía , Stents , Venas Renales/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society collaborated to update the 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum clinical practice guidelines and provide new evidence-based recommendations on critical issues affecting the care of patients with varicose veins. Each recommendation is based on a recent, independent systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic tests and treatments options for patients with lower extremity varicose veins. Part I of the guidelines includes evidence-based recommendations for the evaluation of patients with CEAP (Clinical Class, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathology) class 2 varicose vein using duplex ultrasound scanning and other diagnostic tests, open surgical treatment (ligation and stripping) vs endovenous ablation techniques, thermal vs nonthermal ablation of the superficial truncal veins, and management of incompetent perforating veins in CEAP class 2 disease. We have also made recommendations on the concomitant vs staged treatment of varicose tributaries using phlebectomy or liquid or foam sclerotherapy (with physician-compounded foam or commercially prepared polidocanol endovenous microfoam) for patients undergoing ablation of incompetent superficial truncal veins.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Várices , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Insuficiencia Venosa/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vena Safena/cirugía , Várices/cirugía , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Extremidad InferiorAsunto(s)
Aneurisma/terapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/epidemiología , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Humanos , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The use of social media (SoMe) in medicine has demonstrated the ability to advance networking among clinicians and other healthcare staff, disseminate research, increase access to up-to-date information, and inform and engage medical trainees and the public at-large. With increasing SoMe use by vascular surgeons and other vascular specialists, it is important to uphold core tenets of our commitment to our patients by protecting their privacy, encouraging appropriate consent and use of any patient-related imagery, and disclosing relevant conflicts of interest. Additionally, we recognize the potential for negative interactions online regarding differing opinions on optimal treatment options for patients. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting appropriate and effective use of SoMe content that is honest, well-informed, and accurate. The Young Surgeons Committee of the SVS convened a diverse writing group of SVS members to help guide novice as well as veteran SoMe users on best practices for advancing medical knowledge-sharing in an online environment. These recommendations are presented here with the goal of elevating patient privacy and physician transparency, while also offering support and resources for infrequent SoMe users to increase their engagement with each other in new, virtual formats.