Recognition and initial management of acute aortic dissection.

Acute aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency that should be recognised on presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) because clinical outcome is time-dependent. In suspected cases of acute aortic dissection, immediate imaging with chest computed tomography scan followed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is essential to confirm diagnosis. Immediate medical management is aimed at controlling the heart rate (60-80 beats/min), systolic blood pressure (100-120 mmHg) and pain. Patients with Type A acute aortic dissection should immediately be referred to the cardiothoracic surgeons for emergency aortic surgery while those with Type B acute aortic dissection should be referred to the vascular surgeons for surgical/endovascular interventions if indicated.

A randomised controlled, feasibility study to establish the acceptability of early outpatient review and early cardiac rehabilitation compared to standard practice after cardiac surgery and viability of a future large-scale trial (FARSTER).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability and feasibility of delivering early outpatient review following cardiac surgery and early cardiac rehabilitation (CR), compared to standard practice to establish if a future large-scale trial is achievable. METHODS: A randomised controlled, feasibility trial with embedded health economic evaluation and qualitative interviews, recruited patients aged 18-80 years from two UK cardiac centres who had undergone elective or urgent cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy. Eligible, consenting participants were randomised 1:1 by a remote, centralised randomisation service to postoperative outpatient review 6 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by CR commencement from 8 weeks (control), or postoperative outpatient review 3 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by commencement of CR from 4 weeks (intervention). The primary outcome measures related to trial feasibility including recruitment, retention, CR adherence, and acceptability to participants/staff. Secondary outcome measures included health-rated quality of life using EQ-5D-5L, NHS resource-use, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) distance, 30- and 90-day mortality, surgical site complications and hospital readmission rates. RESULTS: Fifty participants were randomised (25 per group) and 92% declared fit for CR. Participant retention at final follow-up was 74%; completion rates for outcome data time points ranged from 28 to 92% for ISWT and 68 to 94% for follow-up questionnaires. At each time point, the mean ISWT distance walked was greater in the intervention group compared to the control. Mean utility scores increased from baseline to final follow-up by 0.202 for the intervention (0.188 control). Total costs were £1519 for the intervention (£2043 control). Fifteen participants and a research nurse were interviewed. Many control participants felt their outpatient review and CR could have happened sooner; intervention participants felt the timing was right. The research nurse found obtaining consent for willing patients challenging due to discharge timings. CONCLUSION: Recruitment and retention rates showed that it would be feasible to undertake a full-scale trial subject to some modifications to maximise recruitment. Lower than expected recruitment and issues with one of the clinical tests were limitations of the study. Most study procedures proved feasible and acceptable to participants, and professionals delivering early CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN80441309 (prospectively registered on 24/01/2019).

A multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients on the elective waiting list for cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: During the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, elective cardiac surgery was suspended to provide ICU beds for COVID-19 patients and those requiring urgent cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the pandemic on outcomes of patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A multi-centre prospective cohort study. SETTING: The elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. PARTICIPANTS: Patients on the elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was surgery, percutaneous therapy or death at one year. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on patients on the elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. Primary outcome was surgery, percutaneous therapy or death at one year. Demographic data and outcomes were obtained from local electronic records, anonymised and submitted securely to the lead centre for analysis. RESULTS: On 1 March 2020, there were 1099 patients on the elective waiting list for cardiac surgery. On 1 March 2021, 83% (n = 916) had met a primary outcome. Of these, 840 (92%) had surgery after a median of 195 (118-262) days on waiting list, 34 (3%) declined an offer of surgery, 23 (3%) had percutaneous intervention, 12 (1%) died, 7 (0.6%) were removed from the waiting list. The remainder of patients, 183 (17%) remained on the elective waiting list. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown, for the first time, significant delays to treatment of patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery. Although there was a low risk of mortality or urgent intervention, important unmeasured adverse outcomes such as quality of life or increased perioperative risk may be associated with prolonged waiting times.

Case of retained guide wires traversing anatomical boundaries with neurological and cardiac morbidity.

A 69-year-old woman with a history of multiple hospital attendances for cardiac and neurological symptoms, presented with multifocal cerebral infarcts due to embolisation from retained guide wires and was referred for retrieval of two wires. One was intracardiac and the other had migrated through major vascular structures, breeching anatomical boundaries. Just before surgery, she half-expectorated a 35 cm wire that was removed with a video laryngoscope. Three days later, the second wire had traversed the right ventricular myocardium in an attempt to exteriorise, and a 7 cm wire was removed by emergency left anterior mini-thoracotomy. Her recovery was uneventful.

Cardiac surgery outcome during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective review of the early experience in nine UK centres.

BACKGROUND: Early studies conclude patients with Covid-19 have a high risk of death, but no studies specifically explore cardiac surgery outcome. We investigate UK cardiac surgery outcomes during the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 1st March and 30th April 2020 in nine UK centres. Data was obtained and linked locally from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Adult Cardiac Surgery database, the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre database and local electronic systems. The anonymised datasets were analysed by the lead centre. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, propensity score matching (PSM), conditional logistic regression and hierarchical quantile regression. RESULTS: Of 755 included individuals, 53 (7.0%) had Covid-19. Comparing those with and without Covid-19, those with Covid-19 had increased mortality (24.5% v 3.5%, p < 0.0001) and longer post-operative stay (11 days v 6 days, p = 0.001), both of which remained significant after PSM. Patients with a pre-operative Covid-19 diagnosis recovered in a similar way to non-Covid-19 patients. However, those with a post-operative Covid-19 diagnosis remained in hospital for an additional 5 days (12 days v 7 days, p = 0.024) and had a considerably higher mortality rate compared to those with a pre-operative diagnosis (37.1% v 0.0%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: To mitigate against the risks of Covid-19, particularly the post-operative burden, robust and effective pre-surgery diagnosis protocols alongside effective strategies to maintain a Covid-19 free environment are needed. Dedicated cardiac surgery hubs could be valuable in achieving safe and continual delivery of cardiac surgery.

Prospective cohort study of elderly patients with coronary artery disease: impact of frailty on quality of life and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Elderly, frail patients are often excluded from clinical trials so there is lack of data regarding optimal management when they present with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate an unselected elderly population with CAD for the occurrence of frailty, and its association with quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≥80 years presenting with CAD were prospectively assessed for frailty (Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Edmonton frailty scale (EFS)), QoL (Short form survey (SF-12)) and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)). Patients were re-assessed at 4 months to determine any change in frailty and QoL status as well as the clinical outcome. RESULTS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic CAD were recruited in the study. The mean age was 83.7±3.2 years, 99 (66.0%) were men. The clinical presentation was stable angina in 68 (45.3%), the remainder admitted with an acute coronary syndrome including 21 (14.0%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Frailty was present in 28% and 26% by FFP and EFS, respectively, and was associated with a significantly higher CCI (7.5±2.4 in frail, 6.2±2.2 in prefrail, 5.9±1.6 in those without frailty, p=0.005). FFP was significantly related to the physical composite score for QoL, while EFS was significantly related to the mental composite score for QoL (p=0.003). Treatment was determined by the cardiologist: percutaneous coronary intervention in 51 (34%), coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 15 (10%) and medical therapy in 84 (56%). At 4 months, 14 (9.3%) had died. Frail participants had the lowest survival. Cardiovascular symptom status and the mental composite score of QoL significantly improved (52.7±11.5 at baseline vs 55.1±10.6 at follow-up, p=0.04). However, overall frailty status did not significantly change, nor the physical health composite score of QoL (37.2±11.0 at baseline vs 38.5±11.3 at follow-up, p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred to hospital with CAD, frailty is associated with impaired QoL and a high coexistence of comorbidities. Following cardiac treatment, patients had improvement in cardiovascular symptoms and mental component of QoL.

Changing clinical profiles and in-hospital outcomes of octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery over 18 years: a single-centre experience†.

OBJECTIVES: With an ageing population, increasing numbers of octogenarians are undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery. We examine the changing characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for octogenarians over an 18-year period. METHODS: Clinical data from our prospective database for all octogenarians who had cardiac surgery from March 1999 through May 2016 were reviewed. We examined trends, risk profiles and in-hospital outcomes over 3 eras, namely early (1999-2004), middle (2005-2010) and late (2011-2016). A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1022 patients aged 80-94 years in our study cohort. The octogenarian population increased progressively from early to late eras (4.5%, n = 255 vs 7.1%, n = 321 vs 9.3%, n = 446), as the average logistic EuroSCORE predicted mortality (9% vs 9.7% vs 10.1%, P < 0.01). On the contrary, observed mortality declined substantially (9.4% vs 7.8% vs 4.7%, P = 0.04) over this period. While cardiac morbidity and respiratory comorbidities were more prevalent in the late era, chronic renal failure was more frequent in the early era. Over time, more procedures were performed electively (P = 0.05). Common operations across all eras were coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement and CABG + aortic valve replacement. Emergency operation [odds ratio (OR) 4.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-16.35; P < 0.01], poor ejection fraction (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.80-6.32; P < 0.01) and bypass time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; P < 0.01) were predictors of in-hospital mortality. The late era of surgery (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73; P < 0.01) was associated with reduced mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: The operative outcome in this growing surgical population is steadily improving despite the increasing prevalence of comorbidities, and surgery should be performed electively as much as possible.

Feasibility study of early outpatient review and early cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: mixed-methods research design-a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Following cardiac surgery, patients currently attend an outpatient review 6 weeks after hospital discharge, where recovery is assessed and suitability to commence cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is determined. CR is then started from 8 weeks. Following a median sternotomy, cardiac surgery patients are required to refrain from upper body exercises, lifting of heavy objects and other strenuous activities for 12 weeks. A delay in starting CR can prolong the recovery process, increase dependence on family/carers and can cause frustration. However, current guidelines for activity and exercise after median sternotomy have been described as restrictive, anecdotal and increasingly at odds with modern clinical guidance for CR. This study aims to examine the feasibility of bringing forward outpatient review and starting CR earlier. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This is a multicentre, randomised controlled, open feasibility trial comparing postoperative outpatient review 6 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by CR commencement from 8 weeks (control arm) versus, postoperative outpatient review 3 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by commencement of CR from 4 weeks (intervention arm). The study aims to recruit 100 eligible patients, aged 18-80 years who have undergone elective or urgent cardiac surgery involving a full median sternotomy, over a 7-month period across two centres. Feasibility will be measured by consent, recruitment, retention rates and attendance at appointments and CR sessions. Qualitative interviews with trial participants and staff will explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention and the findings integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes to inform the design of a future full-scale randomised controlled trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee on 10 January 2019. The findings will be presented at relevant conferences disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, and to relevant stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN80441309.

Mini-extracorporeal circulation technology, conventional bypass and prime displacement in isolated coronary and aortic valve surgery: a propensity-matched in-hospital and survival analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional cardiopulmonary bypass is the most commonly used means of artificial circulation in cardiac surgery. However, it suffers from the effects of haemodilution and activation of inflammatory/coagulation cascades. Prime displacement (PD) can offset haemodilution and mini-extracorporeal technology (MIECT) can offset both. So far, no study has compared all of these modalities together; hence, we compared the outcomes of these 3 modalities at our institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of our cardiac surgical database. A total of 9626 patients underwent conventional bypass (CB), 3125 patients underwent a modification of CB, called PD, and 904 underwent MIECT. A 1:1 propensity-matching algorithm was employed using IBM SPSS 24 to match (i) 813 MIECT patients with 813 CB patients and (ii) 717 MIECT patients with 717 PD patients. The patients included coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. RESULTS: MIECT had significantly (P < 0.05) longer bypass and cross-clamp times compared to CB and PD. MIECT had significantly higher rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation associated with it compared to CB. The mean red cell blood transfusion was significantly lower in the MIECT group compared to the CB group as was the mean platelet transfusion and fresh frozen plasma transfusion. The overall 5-year survival was higher in the MIECT group compared to the CB group (log-rank, P = 0.018). Between the MIECT and the PD groups, we found the incidence of renal failure and gastrointestinal complications to be significantly higher in the PD group compared to the MIECT group. CONCLUSIONS: MIECT has short-term advantages over CB and PD. However, due to the retrospective limitations of the study, including calendar time bias, a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing all 3 modalities will be beneficial for the larger cardiac community.

The relationship between total arterial revascularization and blood transfusion following coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion adversely affects the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), yet blood transfusion after CABG is still common. Total arterial revascularisation (TAR) is increasingly used in current practice but its impact on postoperative blood transfusion is not known. METHODS: We reviewed the cardiothoracic and blood bank databases and collected data for isolated primary CABG patients from July 2007 to June 2012, excluding patients who had a single graft (n = 148). Perioperative variables of TAR patients (n = 745) were compared with patients who had one or more venous grafts (SVG, n = 1,761) for first-time isolated CABG. The conduits used in TAR patients were predominantly left internal thoracic and radial arteries. Matched group comparison of TAR and SVG patients was performed. The association of TAR with blood transfusion was investigated using multivariate and matched analysis. RESULTS: Of 2,506 patients, the 745 (29.7 %) that had TAR were generally younger, with less complex coronary artery disease and less often diabetic. After correcting for these by 1:1 matching, the mean chest tube drainage and rates of blood transfusion remained significantly lower (p < .0001) in TAR patients. Indeed, red cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma were significantly less frequently transfused in TAR patients. By multivariate analysis, TAR had an independent effect on reducing blood transfusion after CABG [odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97, p = .03]. CONCLUSIONS: TAR achieved predominantly with left internal thoracic and radial arteries substantially reduced blood transfusion rates after primary CABG. Further studies are warranted.

Early and late prognostic implications of coronary artery bypass timing after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after myocardial infarction (MI) is still controversial. With advances in perioperative care and myocardial protection, CABG is not infrequently undertaken sooner. Although CABG soon after MI is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the impact of CABG timing on late survival is not clear. METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data for 8320 patients who underwent primary CABG from 1996 through 2010. Operative outcomes and late survival were compared between patient categories based on MI-to-CABG days: groups A (0-30, n = 658), B (31-60, n = 734), C (>90, n = 2698) and D (no MI, n = 4230). The effect of the timing of surgery on survival was determined using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: As the MI-to-CABG interval increased, the frequency of urgent/emergency operations decreased and hospital mortality (A, 3.5% vs B, 2.6% vs C, 1.2%, vs D, 1.1%, P < 0.0001) steadily declined. In general, patients who had CABG within 90 days of MI had more cardiac morbidity and co-morbidities. Expectedly, therefore, postoperative organ system dysfunction (cardiac, renal, respiratory and neurological) was more frequent in these groups. Reoperation for bleeding was similar for all groups, but blood product transfusion decreased as the MI-to-CABG days increased. The 10-year survival improved with the MI-to-CABG interval (A, 72.2% vs B, 73.4% vs C, 75.8% vs D, 81.4%, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the MI-to-CABG interval was not a risk factor for operative or late mortality. However, less frequent were left internal mammary artery use, non-elective surgery and high blood transfusion rates; all more often associated with shorter MI-to-CABG intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Early and late mortality risk for CABG declines with increasing interval from MI for reasons indirectly linked to the timing of surgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of preoperative organ system optimization and consistent left internal mammary artery use, regardless of the proximity of surgery to MI or the exigency of surgery.

The impact of major perioperative renal insult on long-term renal function and survival after cardiac surgery.

Temporary renal replacement therapy (RRT) facilitates recovery from a major perioperative renal injury and, although RRT can improve the hospital outcome, it is not known as to whether it mitigates long-term renal sequelae. Therefore, we investigated the risk of long-term dialysis after RRT post-cardiac surgery. We analysed prospectively the data collected for all hospital survivors who received RRT following cardiac surgery between March 1996 and July 2010, excluding those on dialysis preoperatively or with a functioning renal transplant. The follow-up data were obtained for all surviving patients. The mean age of the 82 patients was 68.6 ± 9.9 years, and 60 (73%) were male. Severe pre-existing renal dysfunction with a serum creatinine level of >200 µmol/l was present in 15 (18%) patients and diabetes in 31 (38%) patients. Operative procedures included redo surgery (n = 11, 13%) and thoracic aortic surgery (n = 9, 11%). During a 13.4-year follow-up, there were 38 late deaths. Only three patients with severe preoperative renal dysfunction received dialysis. The Kaplan-Meier 5- and 7-year survival rates for this patient cohort were 54% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, a major renal insult requiring temporary RRT after cardiac surgery does not increase the risk for renal dialysis in the long term for patients with normal renal function preoperatively.

A strategy for management of intraoperative Addisonian crisis during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Patients with Addison's disease undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk of developing a crisis. There is no consensus on the preoperative and intraoperative management of this group of patients undergoing cardiac surgery so the recommendations for non-cardiac patients are often used. The consensus statement from the international task force of the American College of Critical Care medicine recommends 100 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone for patients with adrenal insufficiency in septic shock, but in patients undergoing surgery, especially with extracorporeal circulation, the dosage may even be higher. We report our management of a patient with well-controlled adrenal insufficiency for 30 years who developed intraoperative Addisonian crisis despite the recommended preoperative corticosteroid supplementation. The importance of adequate corticosteroid supplementation for cardiac surgery patients, adapting the surgical strategy to allow for optimal management of potential complications and close monitoring with heightened awareness are discussed.

Does aortic valve replacement mitigate the risk of preoperative heart failure?

Congestive heart failure complicating aortic valve disease has been reported to increase the operative mortality associated with aortic valve replacement. To determine whether this adverse effect remains late after aortic valve replacement, we analyzed prospectively collected and survival data of 849 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement between 1999 and 2008. There were 243 (29%) cases of heart failure preoperatively (138 current and 105 prior). Both operative and late mortality rates (up to 10 years) were significantly higher in heart failure patients. Current congestive heart failure caused a 3-fold increase in operative mortality and an 86% increase in late mortality, whereas previous history of heart failure caused a doubling of late mortality. Preoperative heart failure still compromises early and late survival after aortic valve replacement. Surgery should be considered early in patients with aortic valve disease and deferred, when possible, in those with frank heart failure.

Lessons from aprotinin: is the routine use and inconsistent dosing of tranexamic acid prudent? Meta-analysis of randomised and large matched observational studies.

In view of the safety concerns that led to the withdrawal of aprotinin, should antifibrinolytics be used indiscriminately in cardiac surgery? This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety profile of tranexamic acid, and in comparison to aprotinin. We identified randomised trials and large observational studies investigating the use tranexamic acid from January 1995 to January 2009 using Pubmed/Cochrane search engine and included them in a two-tier meta-analysis. There were 25 randomised trials and four matched studies with a total of 5411 and 5977 patients, respectively, reporting tranexamic acid use in varying dosages. Tranexamic acid is administered intravenously either as single dose, infusion or both, sometimes added to pump prime or applied topically. Total intravenous dose of tranexamic acid varies from 1g to 20 g, administered over a period of 20 min to 12h. Compared with placebo, tranexamic acid is associated with a lower mean difference in blood loss (random effect -298 ml, 95% confidence [CI] -367 to -229, p<0.001) and decease in rates of re-operation for bleeding by 48%, transfusion of packed red cell by 47% and use of haemostatic blood products by 67%. A non-significant tendency for postoperative neurological events but a decrease in operative mortality was observed in patients treated with tranexamic acid compared with non-treatment group. Compared to aprotinin, tranexamic acid has less effective blood-conserving effect and mortality risk. Given the potential to increase neurological complications, the current trend towards indiscriminate use of tranexamic acid for all cardiac patients needs to be re-evaluated. Further studies are needed to clarify the neurological risk, appropriate indications and dosing of tranexamic acid.

Early and late prognostic significance of remote and reversible preoperative neurological events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative neurological event with functional impairment is high risk for operative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, data regarding the influence of remote and reversible neurological events on early and late survival are lacking. METHODS: The clinical profile and operative outcome of 5542 patients who underwent first-time CABG from 01 April 1999 through 30 June 2008 were analysed. Late survival data were 100% complete. The relationship between preoperative neurological event and survival (early and late) was investigated using multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: Mean age was 65.2+/-9.2 years, and 494 patients (8.9%) had remote reversible neurological events preoperatively. There were 129 (2.3%) operative and 595 (10.7%) late deaths after a mean follow-up of 4.9+/-2.7 years. Reversible neurological events had strong univariate (odds ratio (OR) 2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-4.33, p<0.0001) and multivariate associations (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.34-3.41, p=0.001) with operative mortality. Although reversible neurological events exhibited a powerful univariate relationship with late deaths (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% CI 1.30-2.12, p<0.0001), this was not maintained after controlling for other factors in multivariable analysis (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97-1.59, p=0.08). Neurological complications, more frequent in patients with preoperative events, were implicated in 25% of operative deaths in patients with preoperative neurological events. The respective 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with reversible neurological events (86% and 68%) were substantially lower than others (91% and 80%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote reversible neurological events increase the risk of fatal and non-fatal postoperative neurological complications. Rigorous measures to improve cerebral protection are warranted in these patients.

To graft or not to graft? Do coronary artery characteristics influence early outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery? Analysis of coronary anastomoses of 5171 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Small coronary size and extensive atherosclerosis pose operative challenges during coronary artery bypass grafting. We investigated the influence of coronary characteristics on early operative outcome. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for 5171 patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting from April 1, 1999, to December 31, 2007, were analyzed. Coronary diameter estimated or probe-gauged intraoperatively was regarded as small if 1.25 mm or less. Coronary atherosclerosis was graded as none/mild or moderate/severe. Their influence on postoperative major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction or reintervention for graft failure, post-cardiotomy shock, and operative mortality, was investigated. RESULTS: Of 14,019 coronary anastomoses, 4417 coronaries (31.5%) were small and 5895 coronaries (43.4%) had moderate/severe atherosclerosis. All grafted coronaries were small in 1091 patients (21.1%). Left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary arteries received grafts in 94.8% of patients (n = 4903), 74.3% of patients (n = 3842), and 72.5% of patients (n = 3751), with corresponding rates of 31.7%, 31.7%, and 32.6% for small-caliber arteries, 44.4%, 33.3%, and 47.2% for moderate/severe atherosclerosis, and 0.6%, 0.5%, and 3.4% for endarterectomy. Postoperative major adverse cardiac events occurred in 236 patients (4.6%). There was no clear evidence that small caliber of half or more distal anastomoses in a patient (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.94; P = .07) increased the risk of a major adverse cardiac event, but incomplete revascularization (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.39; P = .04) and moderate/severe atherosclerosis of the left anterior descending artery (odds ratio 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.87; P = .04) did increase the risk. CONCLUSION: Grafting small coronaries did not significantly increase the risk of an early postoperative major adverse cardiac event, but incomplete revascularization did increase the risk. Our findings support grafting small coronaries when technically feasible to prevent incomplete revascularization.