Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 25
2.
Oncotarget ; 15: 200-218, 2024 Mar 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484152

We describe the analytical validation of NeXT Personal®, an ultra-sensitive, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay for detecting residual disease, monitoring therapy response, and detecting recurrence in patients diagnosed with solid tumor cancers. NeXT Personal uses whole genome sequencing of tumor and matched normal samples combined with advanced analytics to accurately identify up to ~1,800 somatic variants specific to the patient's tumor. A personalized panel is created, targeting these variants and then used to sequence cell-free DNA extracted from patient plasma samples for ultra-sensitive detection of ctDNA. The NeXT Personal analytical validation is based on panels designed from tumor and matched normal samples from two cell lines, and from 123 patients across nine cancer types. Analytical measurements demonstrated a detection threshold of 1.67 parts per million (PPM) with a limit of detection at 95% (LOD95) of 3.45 PPM. NeXT Personal showed linearity over a range of 0.8 to 300,000 PPM (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.9998). Precision varied from a coefficient of variation of 12.8% to 3.6% over a range of 25 to 25,000 PPM. The assay targets 99.9% specificity, with this validation study measuring 100% specificity and in silico methods giving us a confidence interval of 99.92 to 100%. In summary, this study demonstrates NeXT Personal as an ultra-sensitive, highly quantitative and robust ctDNA assay that can be used to detect residual disease, monitor treatment response, and detect recurrence in patients.


Circulating Tumor DNA , Neoplasms , Humans , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Biological Assay , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
3.
Oncotarget ; 14: 789-806, 2023 08 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646774

We describe the analytic validation of NeXT Dx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay to aid therapy and clinical trial selection for patients diagnosed with solid tumor cancers. Proprietary methods were utilized to perform whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing for detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), copy number alterations (CNAs), and gene fusions, and determination of tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability. Variant calling is enhanced by sequencing a patient-specific normal sample from, for example, a blood specimen. This provides highly accurate somatic variant calls as well as the incidental reporting of pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline alterations. Fusion detection via RNA sequencing provides more extensive and accurate fusion calling compared to DNA-based tests. NeXT Dx features the proprietary Accuracy and Content Enhanced technology, developed to optimize sequencing and provide more uniform coverage across the exome. The exome was validated at a median sequencing depth of >500x. While variants from 401 cancer-associated genes are currently reported from the assay, the exome/transcriptome assay is broadly validated to enable reporting of additional variants as they become clinically relevant. NeXT Dx demonstrated analytic sensitivities as follows: SNVs (99.4%), indels (98.2%), CNAs (98.0%), and fusions (95.8%). The overall analytic specificity was >99.0%.


Biological Assay , Exome , Humans , Exome/genetics , Gene Fusion , INDEL Mutation , Genomics
4.
Am J Clin Exp Urol ; 7(5): 341-345, 2019.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31763365

TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion occurs in approximately 50% of prostatic adenocarcinoma and their expression is associated with aggressive phenotype, higher tumor stage, and tumor metastasis. A case of prostatic adenocarcinoma with IRF2BP2-NTRK1 translocation was previously reported. We report a prostatic adenocarcinoma with novel NTRK3 gene fusion that occurs in a 71-year-old male patient with aggressive histologic phenotype and multiple bony metastases. Prostatic biopsy revealed that there is a prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 9 (4+5), grade group 5, and multiple sites of perineural and ganglional invasion. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing were performed. FISH studies showed a breakage within the NTRK3 gene in prostatic adenocarcinoma cells. Next-generation sequencing confirmed that there is a PRPSAP1-NTRK3 translocation in the prostatic adenocarcinoma. In addition, ASXL1, KIF5B, MED12, PIK3CA mutations were found. NTRK alterations or dysregulation of PI3K signaling pathway were found in many types of cancers. TRK inhibitors including larotrectinib and entrectinib were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating TRK fusion-positive malignant tumors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors were under clinical studies on various cancers including prostate cancer. In our current case, both NTRK3 and PIK3CA may serve as biomarkers for precision targeted therapy.

5.
Clin Chem ; 64(2): 329-335, 2018 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982650

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) uses cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as an analyte to detect copy-number alterations in the fetal genome. Because maternal and fetal cfDNA contributions are comingled, changes in the maternal genome can manifest as abnormal NIPT results. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) present in cases of maternal neoplasia has the potential to distort the NIPT readout to a degree that prevents interpretation, resulting in a nonreportable test result for fetal aneuploidy. METHODS: NIPT cases that showed a distortion from normal euploid genomic representation were communicated to the caregiving physician as nonreportable for fetal aneuploidy. Follow-up information was subsequently collected for these cases. More than 450000 pregnant patients who submitted samples for clinical laboratory testing >3 years are summarized. Additionally, in-depth analysis was performed for >79000 research-consented samples. RESULTS: In total, 55 nonreportable NIPT cases with altered genomic profiles were cataloged. Of these, 43 had additional information available to enable follow-up. A maternal neoplasm was confirmed in 40 of these cases: 18 malignant, 20 benign uterine fibroids, and 2 with radiological confirmation but without pathological classification. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of pregnant women who submitted a blood sample for cfDNA testing, an abnormal genomic profile not consistent with fetal abnormalities was detected in about 10 out of 100000 cases. A subset of these observations (18 of 43; 41.9%) was attributed to maternal malignant neoplasms. These observational results suggest the need for a controlled trial to evaluate the potential of using cfDNA as an early biomarker of cancer.


Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Incidental Findings , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/diagnosis , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Cohort Studies , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/blood
6.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314093

Objective: Pharmacogenetic testing holds promise as a personalized medicine tool by permitting individualization of pharmacotherapy in accordance with genes influencing therapeutic response, side effects, and adverse events. The authors evaluated the effect on outcomes for patients diagnosed with neuropsychiatric disorders of pharmacogenetics (PGx)-guided treatment compared to usual standard of care. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized study of 237 patients at an outpatient community-based psychiatric practice conducted between April 2015 and October 2015. Baseline patient assessments and a buccal swab were collected for pharmacogenetic testing at study initiation. For the experimental group, PGx results were provided to the clinicians as guides to treatment. Control subjects were treated according to the usual standard of care with no clinician reference to their PGx results. Neuropsychiatric Questionnaire (NPQ) and Symbol Digit Coding Test (SDC) scores and adverse drug events, hospitalizations, and medication information were collected at 30, 60, and 90 days. Results: More than half (53%) of patients in the control group reported at least 1 adverse drug event compared to 28% of patients with PGx-guided medication management (P = .001). NPQ and SDC scores improved for both groups, but no statistical difference in efficacy as measured by these assessments was observed within the 90-day observation period. Conclusions: Pharmacogenetic testing may facilitate psychiatric drug therapy with greater tolerability and similar efficacy compared to standard of care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02411123​​.


Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/genetics , Pharmacogenomic Testing/methods , Precision Medicine/methods , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Community Mental Health Services/economics , Community Mental Health Services/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Outpatients , Pharmacogenomic Testing/economics , Precision Medicine/economics , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
J Hum Genet ; 61(7): 647-52, 2016 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26984559

The purpose of this noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) study was to compare the fetal fraction of singleton gestations by gestational age, maternal characteristics and chromosome-specific aneuploidies as indicated by z-scores. This study was a multicenter prospective cohort study. Test data were collected from women who underwent NIPT by the massively parallel sequencing method. We used sequencing-based fetal fraction calculations in which we estimated fetal DNA fraction by simply counting the number of reads aligned within specific autosomal regions and applying a weighting scheme derived from a multivariate model. Relationships between fetal fractions and gestational age, maternal weight and height, and z-scores for chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 were assessed. A total of 7740 pregnant women enrolled in the study, of which 6993 met the study criteria. As expected, fetal fraction was inversely correlated with maternal weight (P<0.001). The median fetal fraction of samples with euploid result (n=6850) and trisomy 21 (n=70) were 13.7% and 13.6%, respectively. In contrast, the median fetal fraction values for samples with trisomies 18 (n=35) and 13 (n=9) were 11.0% and 8.0%, respectively. The fetal fraction of samples with trisomy 21 NIPT result is comparable to that of samples with euploid result. However, the fetal fractions of samples with trisomies 13 and 18 are significantly lower compared with that of euploid result. We conclude that it may make detecting these two trisomies more challenging.


DNA/genetics , Genetic Markers , Prenatal Diagnosis , Trisomy/genetics , Adult , Body Weight , DNA/blood , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Reproducibility of Results
8.
Pharmgenomics Pers Med ; 9: 1-6, 2016.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26855597

The health care costs associated with prescription drugs are enormous, particularly in patients with polypharmacy (taking more than five prescription medications), and they continue to grow annually. The evolution of pharmacogenetics has provided clinicians with a valuable tool that allows for a smarter, more fine-tuned approach to treating patients for a number of clinical conditions. Applying a pharmacogenetics approach to the medical management of patients can provide a significant improvement to their care, result in cost savings by reducing the use of ineffective drugs, and decrease overall health care utilization. AltheaDx has begun a study to look at the benefits associated with incorporating pharmacogenetics into the medical management of patients who are on five or more medications. Applying pharmacogenetic guided PharmD recommendations across this patient population resulted in the elimination and/or replacement of one to three drugs, for 50% of the polypharmacy patient population tested, and an estimated US$621 in annual savings per patient. The initial assessment of this study shows that there is a clear opportunity for concrete health care savings solely from prescription drug management when incorporating pharmacogenetic testing.

10.
Prenat Diagn ; 35(8): 816-22, 2015 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013964

OBJECTIVE: Sufficient fetal DNA in a maternal plasma sample is required for accurate aneuploidy detection via noninvasive prenatal testing, thus highlighting a need to understand the factors affecting fetal fraction. METHOD: The MaterniT21™ PLUS test uses massively parallel sequencing to analyze cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and detect chromosomal abnormalities. We assess the impact of a variety of factors, both maternal and fetal, on the fetal fraction across a large number of samples processed by Sequenom Laboratories. RESULTS: The rate of increase in fetal fraction with increasing gestational age varies across the duration of the testing period and is also influenced by fetal aneuploidy status. Maternal weight trends inversely with fetal fraction, and we find no added benefit from analyzing body mass index or blood volume instead of weight. Strong correlations exist between fetal fractions from aliquots taken from the same patient at the same blood draw and also at different blood draws. CONCLUSION: While a number of factors trend with fetal fraction across the cohort as a whole, they are not the sole determinants of fetal fraction. In this study, the variability for any one patient does not appear large enough to justify postponing testing to a later gestational age.


Aneuploidy , DNA/blood , Fetus , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Maternal Serum Screening Tests/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Body Mass Index , Cell-Free System , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
11.
Clin Chem ; 61(4): 608-16, 2015 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25710461

BACKGROUND: The development of sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been largely focused on whole-chromosome aneuploidies (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y). Collectively, they account for only 30% of all live births with a chromosome abnormality. Various structural chromosome changes, such as microdeletion/microduplication (MD) syndromes are more common but more challenging to detect. Recently, several publications have shown results on noninvasive detection of MDs by deep sequencing. These approaches demonstrated the proof of concept but are not economically feasible for large-scale clinical applications. METHODS: We present a novel approach that uses low-coverage whole genome sequencing (approximately 0.2×) to detect MDs genome wide without requiring prior knowledge of the event's location. We developed a normalization method to reduce sequencing noise. We then applied a statistical method to search for consistently increased or decreased regions. A decision tree was used to differentiate whole-chromosome events from MDs. RESULTS: We demonstrated via a simulation study that the sensitivity difference between our method and the theoretical limit was <5% for MDs ≥9 Mb. We tested the performance in a blinded study in which the MDs ranged from 3 to 40 Mb. In this study, our algorithm correctly identified 17 of 18 cases with MDs and 156 of 157 unaffected cases. CONCLUSIONS: The limit of detection for any given MD syndrome is constrained by 4 factors: fetal fraction, MD size, coverage, and biological and technical variability of the event region. Our algorithm takes these factors into account and achieved 94.4% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity.


Chromosome Disorders/genetics , DNA/genetics , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Algorithms , Chromosome Disorders/blood , Cri-du-Chat Syndrome/blood , DNA/blood , DiGeorge Syndrome/blood , Female , Fetus , Humans , Limit of Detection , Prader-Willi Syndrome/blood , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Curr Protoc Hum Genet ; 84: 8.15.1-8.15.20, 2015 Jan 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25599670

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) represents an outstanding example of how novel scientific discoveries can be quickly and successfully developed into hugely impactful clinical diagnostic tests. Since the introduction of NIPT to detect trisomy 21 in late 2011, the technology has rapidly advanced to analyze other autosomal and sex chromosome aneuploidies, and now includes the detection of subchromosomal deletion and duplication events. Here we provide a brief overview of how noninvasive prenatal testing using next-generation sequencing is performed.


Aneuploidy , DNA/blood , Genetic Testing/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , DNA/genetics , DNA/isolation & purification , Female , Fetus , Genetic Testing/instrumentation , Genomic Library , Humans , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/instrumentation , Sequence Analysis, DNA
13.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e109173, 2014.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25289665

OBJECTIVE: As the first laboratory to offer massively parallel sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidies, Sequenom Laboratories has been able to collect the largest clinical population experience data to date, including >100,000 clinical samples from all 50 U.S. states and 13 other countries. The objective of this study is to give a robust clinical picture of the current laboratory performance of the MaterniT21 PLUS LDT. STUDY DESIGN: The study includes plasma samples collected from patients with high-risk pregnancies in our CLIA-licensed, CAP-accredited laboratory between August 2012 to June 2013. Samples were assessed for trisomies 13, 18, 21 and for the presence of chromosome Y-specific DNA. Sample data and ad hoc outcome information provided by the clinician was compiled and reviewed to determine the characteristics of this patient population, as well as estimate the assay performance in a clinical setting. RESULTS: NIPT patients most commonly undergo testing at an average of 15 weeks, 3 days gestation; and average 35.1 years of age. The average turnaround time is 4.54 business days and an overall 1.3% not reportable rate. The positivity rate for Trisomy 21 was 1.51%, followed by 0.45% and 0.21% rate for Trisomies 18 and 13, respectively. NIPT positivity rates are similar to previous large clinical studies of aneuploidy in women of maternal age ≥ 35 undergoing amniocentesis. In this population 3519 patients had multifetal gestations (3.5%) with 2.61% yielding a positive NIPT result. CONCLUSION: NIPT has been commercially offered for just over 2 years and the clinical use by patients and clinicians has increased significantly. The risks associated with invasive testing have been substantially reduced by providing another assessment of aneuploidy status in high-risk patients. The accuracy and NIPT assay positivity rate are as predicted by clinical validations and the test demonstrates improvement in the current standard of care.


Aneuploidy , Genetic Testing , Prenatal Diagnosis , Adult , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 11(9): 1040-4, 2013 Sep 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24029120

This case report describes the rare occurrence of a T790M resistance mutation found in a central nervous system (CNS) parenchymal metastasis. A concomitant squamous histology transformation in a lung non-T790M-resistant metastasis is also described. The authors hypothesize that this CNS resistance and histology transformation may have resulted from intermittent use of erlotinib treatment. This case report emphasizes the complexities of using erlotinib in the induction setting.


Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinazolines/therapeutic use
16.
J Mol Diagn ; 15(4): 415-53, 2013 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23562183

OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. PARTICIPANTS: Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. EVIDENCE: Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture published articles from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. EVIDENCE was formally graded for each recommendation. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). CONCLUSIONS: The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.


ErbB Receptors , Lung Neoplasms , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Humans , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/biosynthesis , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mutation , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Systematic Reviews as Topic
17.
J Thorac Oncol ; 8(7): 823-59, 2013 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23552377

OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. PARTICIPANTS: Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. EVIDENCE: Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). CONCLUSIONS: The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.


ErbB Receptors , Genetic Testing , Lung Neoplasms , Patient Selection , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Humans , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Expert Testimony , Gene Rearrangement , International Agencies , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Mutation/genetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Societies, Medical , Systematic Reviews as Topic
18.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 137(6): 828-60, 2013 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23551194

OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. PARTICIPANTS: Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. EVIDENCE: Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). CONCLUSIONS: The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.


Adenocarcinoma , Antineoplastic Agents , ErbB Receptors , Lung Neoplasms , Patient Selection , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Gefitinib , Genetic Testing , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Systematic Reviews as Topic
19.
Prenat Diagn ; 33(6): 591-7, 2013 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23592550

OBJECTIVE: Whole-genome sequencing of circulating cell free (ccf) DNA from maternal plasma has enabled noninvasive prenatal testing for common autosomal aneuploidies. The purpose of this study was to extend the detection to include common sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs): [47,XXX], [45,X], [47,XXY], and [47,XYY] syndromes. METHOD: Massively parallel sequencing was performed on ccf DNA isolated from the plasma of 1564 pregnant women with known fetal karyotype. A classification algorithm for SCA detection was constructed and trained on this cohort. Another study of 411 maternal samples from women with blinded-to-laboratory fetal karyotypes was then performed to determine the accuracy of the classification algorithm. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the new algorithm had a detection rate (DR) of 100% (95%CI: 82.3%, 100%), a false positive rate (FPR) of 0.1% (95%CI: 0%, 0.3%), and nonreportable rate of 6% (95%CI: 4.9%, 7.4%) for SCA determination. The blinded validation yielded similar results: DR of 96.2% (95%CI: 78.4%, 99.8%), FPR of 0.3% (95%CI: 0%, 1.8%), and nonreportable rate of 5% (95%CI: 3.2%, 7.7%) for SCA determination CONCLUSION: Noninvasive prenatal identification of the most common sex chromosome aneuploidies is possible using ccf DNA and massively parallel sequencing with a high DR and a low FPR.


Aneuploidy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Sex Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , Cohort Studies , DNA/blood , DNA/genetics , Female , Fetus/metabolism , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Male , Mothers , Pregnancy/blood
20.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 33(7): 586-8, 2012 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22922607

The authors report detailed clinical and developmental assessment of 3 brothers who were found to carry a novel mutation in the ARX gene associated with a relatively mild phenotype of static global developmental delay and early hand preference. The decision of when to initiate specialized genetic testing for patients with apparently isolated developmental delay remains controversial, and this report of 3 brothers who presented with early hand preference and transient contralateral weakness may assist clinicians in prioritizing investigations in patients with a similar presentation.


Developmental Disabilities/genetics , Functional Laterality/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Genetic Testing , Humans , Male , Mothers , Phenotype , Siblings
...