Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD19 , Células Dendríticas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Recurrencia , Adulto Joven , AncianoAsunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pronóstico , Proteína 1 Compañera de Translocación de RUNX1/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Subunidad alfa 2 del Factor de Unión al Sitio Principal/genética , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Translocación Genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 8RESUMEN
Sorafenib therapy improves overall survival (OS) in patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We explored the efficacy of sorafenib therapy in this population with different concomitant genetic patterns. In this multi-center, cohort study, we enrolled patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Patients with sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation for at least four weeks were allocated to the sorafenib group, and otherwise to the control group. Endpoints were OS, disease-free survival, and relapse for the whole cohort and OS for genetic pattern subgroups. Among 613 patients enrolled, 275 were in the sorafenib and 338 the control group. Median follow-up was 36.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 25.2-44.7) months post-transplantation. The 3-year OS post-transplantation was 79.6% (95% confidential interval (CI) 74.8%-84.6%) and 65.2% (95% CI 60.3%-70.6%) (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.69; P < 0.0001) in both groups. Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation improved OS in the favorable (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77; P = 0.011) and adverse (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93; P = 0.026) ELN 2017 risk subgroups. Patients with mutated NPM1, DNMT3A, co-occurring NPM1/DNMT3A, "activated signaling" and "DNA methylation" genes benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance, while those carrying CEBPA, "tumor suppressors" and "myeloid transcription factors" genes did not. Patients with FLT3-ITDhigh and FLT3-ITDlow AML both benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance. Our results identify the response of genetic patterns to sorafenib maintenance, providing new viewpoints for the optimal use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD AML in the transplantation setting.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Sorafenib/farmacología , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Proteínas Nucleares , Tirosina Quinasa 3 Similar a fms/genéticaRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy revolutionized treatment for various hematologic malignances. However, limited studies were reported to compare the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) comprehensively. We conducted a single-center, retrospective comparative study that consisted of 12 patients who were treated with DLI (control group) and 12 patients treated with donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cells (experimental group, 6 patients also received CD22 or CD123 CAR-T cells sequentially) with 3 overlaps. The event-free survival (EFS) of patients in experimental group was superior to that of the control group: 516 days versus 98 days (p = 0.0415). Compared with 7 of 12 patients treated with DLI suffered grades III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), one grade III aGVHD developed in patients treated with CAR-T therapy. No significant difference in the incidence of infection was identified between these two groups. Most patients in the experimental group had only mild cytokine release syndrome and none developed neurotoxicity. The univariate analysis of patients in the experiment group revealed that earlier CAR-T therapy for post-transplantation relapse was associated with better EFS. There was no significant difference in EFS between patients treated with dual-target CAR-T with those with single CD19 CAR-T. In this study, our data supported that donor-derived CAR-T therapy is a safe and potentially effective treatment for relapsed B-ALL after HSCT and may be superior to DLI.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/terapia , Antígenos CD19 , LinfocitosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Our open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial showed that sorafenib maintenance after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) improved overall survival and reduced relapse for patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Here, we present a post-hoc analysis on the 5-year follow-up data of this trial. METHODS: This phase 3 trial, done in seven hospitals in China, included patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT, who were aged 18-60 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, had composite complete remission before and after transplantation, and had haematopoietic recovery within 60 days after transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sorafenib maintenance (400 mg orally twice daily) or non-maintenance (control) at 30-60 days after transplantation. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) via an interactive web-based system. Investigators and participants were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse, which was reported previously. For this updated analysis, the 5-year endpoints were overall survival; cumulative incidence of relapse; non-relapse mortality; leukaemia-free survival; graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS); cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD; and late effects in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02474290, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between June 20, 2015, and July 21, 2018, 202 patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (n=102). Median follow-up was 60·4 months (IQR 16·7-73·3). Extended follow-up showed improved overall survival (72·0% [95% CI 62·1-79·7] vs 55·9% [45·7-64·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·34-0·88; p=0·011), leukaemia-free survival (70·0% [60·0-78·0] vs 49·0% [39·0-58·3]; 0·47, 0·30-0·73; p=0·0007), and GRFS (58·0% [47·7-67·0] vs 39·2% [29·8-48·5]; 0·56, 0·38-0·83; p=0·0030), lower cumulative incidence of relapse (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 36·3% [27·0-45·6]; 0·33, 0·18-0·60; p=0·0003), and no increase in non-relapse mortality (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 14·7% [8·6-22·3]; 0·79, 0·39-1·62; p=0·98) for patients in the sorafenib group compared with those in the control group. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (54·0% [43·7-63·2] vs 51·0% [40·8-60·3]; 0·82, 0·56-1·19; p=0·73) did not differ significantly between the two groups and we did not find substantial differences in late effects between the two groups. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: With extended follow-up, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation is associated with improved long-term survival and reduced relapse rates compared with non-maintenance, further supporting this strategy as a standard of care for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Bronquiolitis Obliterante , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Tirosina Quinasa 3 Similar a fms/genéticaRESUMEN
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and neutropenia are common toxicities associated with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. The role of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in CAR-T-cell-treated patients remains unclear. To explore the efficacy and safety of early G-CSF administration in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) who were receiving autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cells, we retrospectively collected and summarized clinical data to compare patients receiving G-CSF within 14 days (early G-CSF group) to patients receiving later or no G-CSF (control group) after their CART infusion. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence and duration of neutropenia between the early G-CSF group and the control group (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.65; 8 vs. 4 days, p = 0.37, respectively). However, the incidence and duration of CRS were significantly higher in the early G-CSF group than in the control group (81% vs. 38%, p = 0.03; 3 vs. 0 days, p = 0.004, respectively). Moreover, early G-CSF application had no significant effect on the expansion and efficacy of CAR-T cells. In conclusion, our study suggested that early G-CSF administration did not reduce the incidence and duration of neutropenia but rather increased the incidence and duration of CRS.
Asunto(s)
Neutropenia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígenos CD19 , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Adoptive cellular immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has emerged as a novel modality for treating relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). With increasing approval of CAR T-cell products and advances in CAR T cell therapy, CAR T cells are expected to be used in a growing number of cases. However, CAR T-cell-associated toxicities can be severe or even fatal, thus compromising the survival benefit from this therapy. Standardizing and studying the clinical management of these toxicities are imperative. In contrast to other hematological malignancies, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and multiple myeloma, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-associated toxicities in B-NHL have several distinctive features, most notably local cytokine-release syndrome (CRS). However, previously published guidelines have provided few specific recommendations for the grading and management of toxicities associated with CAR T-cell treatment for B-NHL. Consequently, we developed this consensus for the prevention, recognition, and management of these toxicities, on the basis of published literature regarding the management of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-associated toxicities and the clinical experience of multiple Chinese institutions. This consensus refines a grading system and classification of CRS in B-NHL and corresponding measures for CRS management, and delineates comprehensive principles and exploratory recommendations for managing anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-associated toxicities in addition to CRS.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Antígenos CD19 , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/efectos adversos , Consenso , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Use of kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib and imatinib might increase the risk of opportunistic infections, especially Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. However, the effect of sorafenib on EBV and CMV infections remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation on the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: This was a follow-up of our randomized controlled trial undertaken at seven hospitals in China. The primary endpoint was EBV and CMV infections within 3 years post-transplantation. Secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidences of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 3 years. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (control, n=102). Median extended follow-up post-transplantation was 36.8 (range, 2.5-67.1) months. The 3-year cumulative incidences of EBV-DNAemia and EBV-associated diseases were 24.0% (95% CI: 16.1-32.8%) and 5.0% (1.8-10.6%) in the sorafenib group, and 24.5% (16.6-33.2%) and 5.9% (2.4-11.6%) in the control group (P=0.937; P=0.771). The 3-year cumulative incidences of CMV-DNAemia and CMV-associated diseases were 56.0% (45.6-65.1%) and 8.0% (3.7-14.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 52.9% (42.7-62.1%) and 8.8% (4.3-15.3%) in the control group (P=0.997; P=0.826). The 3-year cumulative mortality of EBV- and CMV-associated diseases was 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 1.0% (0.1-4.8%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.3%) in the control group (P=0.322, P=0.980). The 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse, NRM, OS, LFS, and GRFS were 13.0%, 11.1%, 79.0%, 75.9%, and 65.8% in the sorafenib group and 34.8%, 12.7%, 61.4%, 52.5%, and 46.6% in the control group, respectively (P<0.001, P=0.656, P=0.005, P<0.001, P=0.003). The reconstitution of T lymphocyte subsets, B lymphocytes, and natural killer cells was similar between the two groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation does not increase the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections, demonstrating a favorable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474290 . Registered on June 14, 2015.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Herpesvirus Humano 4/genética , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Tirosina Quinasa 3 Similar a fms/genéticaRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of haematological malignancies. However, resistance and relapse remain prominent limitations, and they are related to the limited persistence and efficacy of CAR T cells, downregulation or loss of tumour antigens, intrinsic resistance of tumours to death signalling, and immune suppressive microenvironment. Rational combined modality treatments are regarded as a promising strategy to further unlock the antitumor potential of CAR T cell therapy, which can be applied before CAR T cell infusion as a conditioning regimen or in ex vivo culture settings as well as concomitant with or after CAR T cell infusion. In this review, we summarize the combinatorial strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted therapies and other immunotherapies, in an effort to further enhance the effectiveness of this impressive therapy and benefit more patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T , Linfocitos T , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Four databases were searched for relevant studies. Among patients treated with donor-derived CAR T-cell therapy, ALL patients had a complete remission (CR) rate of 80 % and a 1-year overall survival rate of 51 %. The graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) rate was 4 %, cytokine release syndrome was 69 %, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 8 %. For off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy, the CR rate for ALL was 70 %, and for NHL, it was 52 %. The objective response rate for NHL was 72 %. The pooled GvHD of off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for ALL and NHL combined was 0 %. Allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are effective and safe for treating R/R ALL and NHL. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: All datasets generated in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Antígenos CD19 , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/terapia , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety and the risk factors affecting prognosis of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated by cladribine-based intensified conditioning regimen. METHODS: The clinical data of 28 patients with high-risk AML treated by cladribine in combination with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) intensified conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University from October 2016 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The overall survival (OS) rate, cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) rate, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), regimen related toxicity (RRT) and risk factors affecting prognosis of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The 1-year OS and PFS of the patients after implantation was (78.8±8.6)% and (79.8±8.1)%, while the 1-year cumulative relapse rate and NRM of the patients was 9.3% and 22.0%, respectively. The 1-year expected OS of MRD- high-risk patients before HSCT was 100%. The 1-year expected OS and PFS of the patients in pre-transplant relapse group was (46.9±18.7)% and (50.0±17.7)%, respectively. The incidence of I/II grade RRT was 39.3%. NO III/IV grade RRT were found in 28 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant relapse was the independent risk factor affecting OS and PFS of the patients. CONCLUSION: The intensified conditioning regimen of cladribine in combination with BuCy can reduce the relapse rate of high-risk AML transplantation, and its RRT is mild, exhibiting good safety. MRD- high-risk patients before HSCT can achieve better transplant benefits, but the prognosis of patients with relapse before transplantation is not significantly improved. Therefore, for non-relapsed high-risk AML patients, this intensified conditioning regimen deserves to be considered.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Busulfano , Cladribina , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acondicionamiento PretrasplanteRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and greatly improves disease outcomes. The impressive success has inspired the application of this approach to other types of tumors. The relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies are characteristic of high heterogeneity and poor prognoses. The efficacy of current treatments for this group of diseases is limited. CAR-T therapy is a promising solution to ameliorate the current therapeutic situation. One of the major challenges is that normal T-cells typically share mutual antigens with malignant cells, which causes fratricide and serious T-cell aplasia. Moreover, T-cells collected for CAR transduction could be contaminated by malignant T-cells. The selection of suitable target antigens is of vital importance to mitigate fratricide and T-cell aplasia. Using nanobody-derived or naturally selected CAR-T is the latest method to overcome fratricide. Allogeneic CAR-T products and CAR-NK-cells are expected to avoid tumor contamination. Herein, we review the advances in promising target antigens, the current results of CAR-T therapy clinical trials in T-cell malignancies, the obstacles of CAR-T therapy in T-cell malignancies, and the solutions to these issues.
RESUMEN
Bcr-Abl threonine 315 to isoleucine 315 (T315I) gatekeeper mutation induced drug resistance remains an unmet clinical challenge for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Chemical degradation of Bcr-AblT315I protein has become a potential strategy to overcome drug resistance. Herein, we first described the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a new class of selective Bcr-AblT315I proteolysis-targeting chimeric (PROTAC) degraders based on GZD824 (reported as Bcr-AblT315I inhibitor by our group). One of the degrader 7o with 6-member carbon chain linkage with pomalidomide exhibits the most potent degradation efficacy with DR of 69.89% and 94.23% at 100 and 300 nmol/L, respectively, and has an IC50 value of 26.8 ± 9.7 nmol/L against Ba/F3T315I cells. Further, 7o also displays substantial tumor regression against Ba/F3-Bcr-AblT315I xenograft model in vivo.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy with non-HSCT in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), relapse rate, and leukemia-free survival (LFS) as well as overall incidence rates for transplant-related mortality (TRM), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and infections were calculated using Stata software. RESULTS: We screened 3,441 studies and identified 19 eligible studies with 690 patients. Among the patients who achieved complete remission (CR) after CD19 CAR-T therapy, consolidative HSCT was beneficial for OS (HR = 0.34, 95% CI, 0.170.68, P = 0.003), the relapse rate (HR = 0.16, 95% CI, 0.100.25, P < 0.001), and LFS (HR = 0.15, 95% CI, 0.080.28, P < 0.001). For patients who achieved MRD-negative (neg) CR after CD19 CAR-T therapy, consolidative HSCT was beneficial for OS (0.57, 95% CI, 0.330.99, P = 0.045), the relapse rate (0.14, 95% CI, 0.060.31, P < 0.001), and LFS (0.21, 95% CI, 0.120.35, P < 0.001). Regarding safety, we calculated pooled incidence rates for TRM (8%, 95% CI, 0.020.15), aGVHD (44%, 95% CI, 0.230.67), cGVHD (36%, 95% CI, 0.170.56), and infections (39%, 95% CI, 0.030.83). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-HSCT treatment, consolidative HSCT after CD19 CAR-T therapy for R/R B-ALL patients can prolong OS and LFS and reduce the risk of relapse. The incidence rates for adverse events are acceptable. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to avoid bias and further determine the efficacy of HSCT.
RESUMEN
In recent years, the excellent curative effect of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has brought hope to patients with relapsing or refractory B-cell hematological malignancies, however relapse after CAR T-cell infusion has hindered the widespread clinical application of this immunotherapy and targeted antigen-negative relapse has caused widespread concern. Consequently, strategies for increasing targeted antigens have been created. In addition to the most widely applied target, namely CD19, researchers have further explored the possibility of other targets, such as CD20, CD22, CD33, and CD123, and have tested a series of combination antigen CAR T-cell therapies. Here, we summarize the current preclinical and clinical studies of dual-target CAR T cells.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Animales , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Linfocitos T/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Background: The administration of second- or third-generation anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has remarkably improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies. However, there are limited clinical results from fourth-generation CAR-T cell therapy, and the factors affecting response rate and survival have not been fully determined. Methods: Lymphoma patients with progression or relapse after intensive treatments, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and life expectancy >2 months were enrolled in the study. Peripheral lymphocytes were collected through apheresis, and magnetically selected T cells were lentivirally transduced with a 4th-generation CAR featuring an anti-CD19 CAR and the iCasp9 suicide switch (4SCAR19). The patients received 4SCAR19 T cell infusion after approximately seven days of expansion and a conditioning regimen comprising cyclophosphamide/fludarabine. The efficacy, safety, and risk factors were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled and received 4SCAR19 T cell infusions at a median dose of 8.9×105 CAR-T cells/kg. The overall response rate was 67% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43 to 85], with 43% of patients achieving a complete response and 24% having a partial response. The overall and complete response rates were 58 and 33% in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) group and 78 and 56% in the non-DLBCL group, respectively. The median overall survival was 23.8 months (95% CI, not reached), with a median follow-up of 13.7 months. Factors affecting overall survival were International Prognostic Index (IPI), disease type, and remission status after CAR-T cell treatment. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 during treatment were neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (71%), and thrombocytopenia (29%). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 14%, and all cases were grade 1. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. No deaths were attributed to infusion of 4SCAR19 T cells, CRS, or neurotoxicity. Conclusions: In this study, patients with relapsed or refractory B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received 4SCAR19 T cell therapy had durable responses and few of adverse events. The IPI model is suitable for evaluating the prognosis of patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR-OOC-16007779.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Leucopenia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/etiología , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trombocitopenia/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the treatment of acute monocytic leukemia (AML-M5) and the related factors that affecting the prognosis of the patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 71 patients with AML-M5 treated with allo-HSCT in Zhujiang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University from April 2009 to October 2019 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cumulative overall survival (OS) rate, cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) rate, transplantation-related mortality (TRM), relapse rate and the risk factors affecting prognosis in the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: 66 patients obtained hematopoietic reconstruction after transplantation, the median time of granulocyte implantation was 12 (9-26) d, and the median time of megakaryocytic implantation was 13 (8-72) d. The incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD was 33.8% (24/71) and 36.6% (26/71), respectively. The median follow-up time was 13.81 (0.16 to 112.54) months; the median OS and PFS was 31.27 and 26.07 months, respectively. The cumulative OS of the patients in 1 and 3 years after transplantation was 64.9% and 48.6%, respectively, and the cumulative PFS of the patients in 1 and 3 years was 55.0% and 39.5%, respectively. The cumulative relapse rate of the patients in 1 and 3 years was 24% and 40%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplantation relapse was the independent risk factor affecting OS (HR=2.32, 95%CI:1.17-4.62, P=0.02) and PFS (HR=3.08, 95%CI:1.61-5.90, P=0.001) of the patients; invasive fungal disease after transplantation was the independent risk factor affecting OS (HR=2.71, 95% CI:1.32-5.56, P=0.007) and PFS (HR=2.87, 95%CI=1.40-5.86, P=0.004) of the patients; FLT3 mutation was the independent risk factor affecting PFS (HR=2.13, 95%CI=1.07-4.24, P=0.03) of the patients. CONCLUSION: AML-M5 is the intermediate or high-risk leukemia, and allo-HSCT can improve the survival prognosis of the patients. Pre-transplantation relapse and invasive fungal disease after transplantation are the important factors affecting the efficacy of allo-HSCT in patients with AML-M5.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Monocítica Aguda , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Niño , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Utilizing oxidative stress has recently been regarded as a potential strategy for tumor therapy. The NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 1 (NUAK1) is a critical component of the antioxidant defense system and is necessary for the survival of tumors. Therefore, NUAK1 is considered an attractive therapeutic target in cancer. However, antioxidant therapy induced elevated ROS levels to activate the Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) pathway to promote protective autophagy and ULK1-dependent mitophagy. Thus, the combined inhibition of NUAK1 and ULK1 showed a strong synergistic effect in different tumor types. Herein, the potential antitumor activities of a dual NUAK1/ULK1 inhibitor MRT68921 were evaluated in both tumor cell lines and animal models. MRT68921 significantly kills tumor cells by breaking the balance of oxidative stress signals. These results highlight the potential of MRT68921 as an effective agent for tumor therapy.