Midterm Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Background: Patellar instability is frequently encountered in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The clinical outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability in patients with EDS are unknown. Purpose: To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of isolated MPFLR for patellar instability in patients with EDS and factors affecting these outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In a retrospective study, 31 patients (n = 47 knees) with EDS and patellar instability who underwent isolated MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability between 2008 and 2017 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative radiographic images were measured for anatomic risk factors. Clinical outcomes-including postoperative complications-were evaluated. Factors associated with MPFLR failure were identified. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-including the pediatric version of the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Kujala score, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-were collected, and factors affecting PRO scores were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 14.9 ± 2 years. At a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 18 of 47 (38.3%) knees required reoperations, of which 9 of 47 (19.1%) knees required revision stabilization for recurrent patellar instability. Also, 7 of 31 knees (22.6%) with autografts failed compared with 2 of 16 (12.5%) with allografts (P = .69). For autografts, 6 of 17 (35.3%) failures occurred with gracilis, but 0 of 13 (0%) occurred with semitendinosus (P = .02). Compared with patients without failures, patients with failed primary MPFLR were significantly younger (P = .0005) and were able to touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended (P = .03). For radiographic parameters, the patellar height and tilt were significantly higher in the failure group. The postoperative PROs were suboptimal at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years. All but 1 patient were satisfied with the final outcome. Conclusion: At the midterm follow-up, 38.3% of patients with EDS required further surgery after isolated MPFLR for patellar instability; half of these revisions (19.1%) were to address recurrent instability. Recurrent instability after isolated MPFLR was more likely in younger patients and those who could touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended. Postoperative PROs were inferior; nonetheless, patient satisfaction was high.

MPFL Reconstruction and Implant-Mediated Guided Growth in Skeletally Immature Patients With Patellar Instability and Genu Valgum.

BACKGROUND: There is a higher rate of failure of isolated MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with patellar instability compared to skeletally mature patients. Genu valgum is a known risk factor for patellar instability. There is potential for concomitant surgical correction of genu valgum to achieve better clinical outcomes and to decrease failure rates of MPFL reconstruction. PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of combined medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and implant-mediated guided growth (IMGG) in skeletally immature patients with patellar instability and genu valgum. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: In a multicenter study, all skeletally immature patients with recurrent patellar instability and genu valgum who underwent MPFL reconstruction using hamstring graft and IMGG using a transphyseal screw or tension band plate for the distal femur and/or proximal tibia were included. The knee valgus angle and mechanical axis were measured on full-length radiographs and anatomic risk factors were measured on MRI. Patients were followed until correction of their lower limb alignment and implant removal or until skeletal maturity. Clinical outcomes, including complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (37 knees) were included in the study. The mean age and skeletal age of the cohort were 12.4 and 12.9 years, respectively. Simultaneous MPFL reconstruction and IMGG were performed in 26 of 37 knees; 11 underwent staged procedures. Twenty knees had transphyseal screws and 17 knees had tension band plates for IMGG. The knee valgus corrected from a mean of 12.4° to 5.1° in 12.1 months. Implants were removed from 22 of 37 knees once genu valgum was corrected. There was no significant difference (P = .65) in the correction rate between plates (0.7 deg/month) and screws (0.6 deg/month). Ten complications occurred in 4 patients (7 knees) and included 5 patellar redislocations, 2 rebound valgus, 1 varus overcorrection, 1 knee arthrofibrosis, and 1 implant loosening. For children <10 years of age, 3 of 6 (50%) knees had patellar redislocations and 5 of 6 knees had a complication. This was statistically significant (P = .003) compared with patients >10 years of age. Similarly, for patients with bilateral knee involvement, 5 of 12 (42%) knees had patellar redislocations and a total of 8 complications occurred in this subset. This was statistically significant (P < .001) compared with patients with unilateral involvement. CONCLUSION: IMGG with plates or screws in the setting of combined MPFL reconstruction improves genu valgum. Children <10 years of age and those with bilateral instability with genu valgum remain difficult subsets to treat with higher complication rates.

Consensus-Based Guidelines for Management of First-Time Patellar Dislocation in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: The management of first-time patellar dislocation remains variable, with limited evidence to support or compare different operative and nonoperative modalities. The primary aim was to establish consensus-based guidelines for different components of nonoperative treatment following a first-time patellar dislocation. The secondary aim was to develop guidelines related to management after failed nonoperative treatment. The tertiary aim was to establish consensus-based guidelines for the management of first-time patellar dislocation with a concomitant osteochondral fracture. METHODS: A 29-question, multiple-choice, case-based survey was developed by 20 members of the Patellofemoral Research Interest Group of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine Society. The survey consisted of questions related to demographic information, management of first-time patellar dislocation without an osteochondral fracture, and management of first-time patellar dislocation with a 2 cm osteochondral fracture. The survey underwent 2 rounds of iterations by Patellofemoral Research Interest Group members and the final survey was administered to Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine members, using REDCap. Consensus-based guidelines were generated when more than 66% of respondents chose the same answer. RESULTS: Seventy-nine of 157 (50%) eligible members responded. Sixty-one were orthopaedic surgeons and 18 were primary sports medicine physicians. Eleven consensus-based guidelines were generated based on survey responses. Those that met the criteria for consensus included initial knee radiographs (99% consensus), nonoperative treatment for first-time patellar dislocation without an osteochondral fracture (99%), physical therapy starting within the first month postinjury (99%), with return to sport after 2 to 4 months (68%) with a brace (75%) and further follow-up as needed (75%). Surgical treatment was recommended if there were patellar subluxation episodes after 6 months of nonoperative treatment (84%). Patellar stabilization should be considered for a first-time dislocation with an osteochondral fracture (81.5%). CONCLUSION: Consensus-based guidelines offer recommendations for the management of first-time patellar dislocation with or without an osteochondral fracture. Several changing trends and areas of disagreement were noted in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the absence of high-level evidence, consensus-based guidelines may aid in clinical decision-making when treating patients following a first-time patellar dislocation. These guidelines highlight the evolving trends in clinical practice for the management of first-time patellar dislocation. Areas not reaching consensus serve as topics for future research.

Medial clavicle shaft fractures in children and adolescents: differences from adults and management.

Clavicle fractures are a common injury in the pediatric and adolescent population. Most fractures are located in the middle third of the clavicle. There has been no information in the literature regarding the management of extra-physeal medial clavicle shaft fractures in this population. The objective of this study is to evaluate demographic and injury characteristics, management options and clinical outcomes of medial clavicle fractures in children and adolescents and differentiate them from those in adults. A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to identify patients with medial clavicle shaft fractures. Radiographs, clinical features and patient-reported outcomes (QuickDASH) were analyzed. Eight patients were identified with medial clavicle fractures. Two fractures could not be diagnosed on anteroposterior radiographs. Both operative (four patients) and nonoperative (four patients) treatment had excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes, irrespective of initial displacement. Compared to high-energy and life-threatening injuries in adults, these fractures in children and adolescents were sports-related and isolated fractures. Conservative treatment should be considered for medial clavicle fractures in children and adolescents. These fractures are distinct from their adult counterparts and do not lead to increased morbidity or mortality.