BACKGROUND: Few antiviral therapies have been studied in patients with COVID-19 and kidney impairment. Herein, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, its metabolites, and sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin excipient were evaluated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. METHODS: In REDPINE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants aged ≥12 years hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or kidney failure were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on Day 1; 100 mg daily up to Day 5) or placebo (enrollment: March 2021-March 2022). The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) through Day 29. Safety was evaluated through Day 60. RESULTS: Although enrollment concluded early, 243 participants were enrolled and treated (remdesivir, n = 163; placebo, n = 80). At baseline, 90 (37.0%) participants had AKI (remdesivir, 60; placebo, 30), 64 (26.3%) had CKD (remdesivir, 44; placebo, 20), and 89 (36.6%) had kidney failure (remdesivir, 59; placebo, 30); 31 (12.8%) were COVID-19 vaccinated. Composite all-cause mortality or IMV through Day 29 was 29.4% and 32.5% in the remdesivir and placebo group, respectively (P = 0.61). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 80.4% versus 77.5% and serious adverse events in 50.3% versus 50.0% of participants who received remdesivir versus placebo, respectively. Pharmacokinetic plasma exposure to remdesivir was not affected by kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Although underpowered, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between treatment groups. REDPINE demonstrated that remdesivir is safe in those with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. (EudraCT number: 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT04745351). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT04745351.
There is an unmet need for safe and efficacious oral therapies for COVID-19 with low potential for drug-drug interactions. Obeldesivir is an orally administered nucleoside prodrug that has shown antiviral potency in nonclinical studies against SARS-CoV-2 and its circulating variants. Obeldesivir is metabolized to the active nucleoside triphosphate (GS-443902), which acts as an inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, thereby inhibiting viral RNA synthesis. Here, we report the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics from a first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study following oral administration of obeldesivir and a phase I, open-label absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion study following oral administration of [14C]-obeldesivir. Overall, obeldesivir was safe and well tolerated at single and multiple doses between 100 and 1,600 mg, with low potential for QT prolongation as assessed by QT-concentration analysis. The exposures to GS-441524 increased dose proportionally in the 100-900-mg dose range. GS-441524 accumulated by 35% after twice-daily and 12% after once-daily dosing for 5 days. Dose-proportional increases in the intracellular concentration of GS-443902 were also observed in peripheral blood mononuclar cells. Plasma exposure of GS-441524 was not significantly altered by food intake. Following oral administration of [14C]-obeldesivir (500 mg; 100 µCi), the mean cumulative [14C]-dose recovery was 90.7% with 58.5% in urine and 32.2% in feces. GS-441524 was the predominant plasma component (90% of 14C-area under the concentration-time curve) and was primarily eliminated via renal excretion. Collectively, data from these studies support selection of the obeldesivir 350 mg twice-daily dosing regimen for further evaluation in phase III studies for COVID-19.
PURPOSE: To assess splenic involvement using B-mode ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared with standard imaging with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) / 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging data from 112 patients from 12/2003 to 10/2022 with histologically confirmed Hodgkin lymphoma during staging or relapse were analyzed for splenic lymphoma involvement. In all patients, standard imaging (CT/PET-CT), along with B-mode US and CEUS examinations, was performed. Evidence of focal splenic lesions (FSLs) found by imaging procedures was suggestive of splenic involvement. Follow-up imaging was performed in each patient after treatment, and treatment response indicated definitive splenic involvement. RESULTS: 40 patients (35.7%) were identified by imaging modalities as having splenic involvement, which was confirmed by response during follow-up. Standard CT/PET-CT imaging detected splenic involvement in 36/112 patients (32.1%). FSLs were detected with B-mode US in 38 patients (33.9%) and CEUS in 36 patients (32.1%). The sensitivity of standard imaging, B-mode US, and CEUS was 90%, 95%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSION: B-mode US examination is a diagnostic method used in addition to standard imaging for the detection of splenic involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma. CEUS does not provide additional benefit compared to B-mode US and the standard reference procedure.
Intravenous remdesivir (RDV) is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals with coronavirus disease 2019. RDV undergoes intracellular metabolic activation to form the active triphosphate, GS-443902, and other metabolites. Alternative administration routes, including localized pulmonary delivery, can lower systemic exposure and maximize exposure at the site of action. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of inhaled RDV in healthy adults. This phase Ia, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated inhaled RDV in healthy participants randomized 4:1 to receive RDV or placebo as single doses (4 cohorts) or multiple once-daily doses (3 cohorts). Doses in cohorts 1-6 were administered as an aerosolized solution for inhalation through a sealed facemask; doses in cohort 7 were administered as an aerosolized solution for inhalation through a mouthpiece. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Seventy-two participants were enrolled (inhaled RDV, n = 58 and placebo, n = 14). Following single RDV doses, RDV, GS-704277, and GS-441524 plasma PK parameters indicated dose-proportional increases in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) extrapolated to infinite time, AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration, and maximum observed concentration. Analyte plasma concentrations after multiple RDV doses were consistent with those for single-dose RDV. Analyte plasma exposures were lower when RDV was administered with a mouthpiece versus a sealed facemask. The most common adverse events included nausea, dizziness, and cough. Single- and multiple-dose inhaled RDV exhibited linear and dose-proportional plasma PK. Administration of RDV via inhalation was generally safe and well-tolerated.
Alanine , Adult , Humans , Healthy Volunteers , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Alanine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
BACKGROUND: FGFR alterations are reported across various malignancies and might act as oncogenic drivers in multiple histologies. Erdafitinib is an oral, selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in FGFR-altered advanced urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of erdafitinib in previously treated patients with FGFR-altered advanced solid tumours. METHODS: The single-arm, phase 2 RAGNAR study was conducted at 156 investigative centres (hospitals or oncology practices that are qualified oncology study centres) across 15 countries. The study consisted of four cohorts based on tumour histology and patient age; the results reported in this Article are for the primary cohort of the study, defined as the Broad Panel Cohort, which was histology-agnostic. We recruited patients aged 12 years or older with advanced or metastatic tumours of any histology (except urothelial cancer) with predefined FGFR1-4 alterations (mutations or fusions according to local or central testing). Eligible patients had disease progression on at least one previous line of systemic therapy and no alternative standard therapy available to them, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (or equivalent for adolescents aged 12-17 years). Patients received once-daily oral erdafitinib (8 mg/day with provision for pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg/day) on a continuous 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent review committee according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, or Response Assessment In Neuro-Oncology (RANO). The primary analysis was conducted on the treated population of the Broad Panel Cohort. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04083976. FINDINGS: Patients were recruited between Dec 5, 2019, and Feb 15, 2022. Of 217 patients treated with erdafitinib, 97 (45%) patients were female and 120 (55%) were male. The data cutoff was Aug 15, 2022. At a median follow-up of 17·9 months (IQR 13·6-23·9), an objective response was observed in 64 (30% [95% CI 24-36]) of 217 patients across 16 distinct tumour types. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events related to erdafitinib were stomatitis (25 [12%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (12 [6%]), and hyperphosphataemia (11 [5%]). The most commonly occurring serious treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher) were stomatitis in four (2%) patients and diarrhoea in two (1%). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: RAGNAR results show clinical benefit for erdafitinib in the tumour-agnostic setting in patients with advanced solid tumours with susceptible FGFR alterations who have exhausted other treatment options. These results support the continued development of FGFR inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumours. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Female , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Disease Progression
The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) tisotumab vedotin (TV) received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of adults with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, developed using dosing data from four clinical TV studies, was used to estimate individual exposure and explore safety and efficacy exposure-response (ER) relationships. Because PK analysis showed no appreciable accumulation of TV and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) with repeated dosing, cycle 1 exposure metrics and predicted average concentrations from time zero until end of the cycle in which an event occurred (CavgLast ) were used for ER analyses. The probability of achieving objective response increased significantly as the ADC cycle 1 maximum serum concentration (Cmax ) increased. The probability of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification increased significantly as ADC cycle 1 area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased. Number of grade 2+ ocular AEs increased significantly as ADC cycle 1 AUC, Cmax , and ADC CavgLast increased. MMAE cycle 1 AUC predicted risk of serious treatment-related AEs. The relationship between ADC exposure and efficacy end points suggests ADC treatment was associated with clinically meaningful response across the observed exposures; greater exposure was associated with increased efficacy. The relationship between ADC and MMAE exposure and safety end points suggests increased exposure was associated with increased AE risk. These results align with clinical findings showing TV 2 mg/kg (≤200 mg for patients ≥100 kg) every 3 weeks is efficacious and tolerable for patients with r/mCC.
Immunoconjugates , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects
Instances of violence and aggression in acute psychiatric settings are common and highly distressing for service users and staff. They also incur financial costs. This study aimed to identify the proportion of service users at risk of consistent violence/aggression enactment. It also aimed to analyse associated service use to explore the potential need for specialised, targeted approaches. Five years' worth of data were extracted from 2016 to 2020 on inpatient stays across South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) acute adult wards and Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). Service users were divided into cohorts based on relative number of violent/agressive incidents enacted. Differences in frequency of acute service use during the period 1st January-31st December 2020 were analysed. In total, 2524 service users had at least one inpatient stay during 2020. 679 were recorded as having enacted at least one incident of violence or aggression. Just 4% of all service users accounted for 50% of all violence/aggression enactment. Results further showed strong evidence of group differences between violence cohorts in the following domains: internal transfers, occupied bed days, admissions and Place of Safety (PoS) referrals. There was weaker evidence for group differences in referrals to Home Treatment teams (HTTs) and Psychiatric Liaison Teams. A small proportion of service users disproportionately account for the majority of violent and aggressive incidents and higher levels of violence and aggression are associated with more acute service use. The provision of targeted, personalised interventions for this cohort may reduce the enactment of violence and aggression, leading to improved quality life and a reduction in financial expenditure.
Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Adult , Humans , Inpatients , Violence , Aggression/psychology , Hospitalization , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology
Tisotumab vedotin is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) for treatment of solid tumors expressing tissue factor with accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with disease progression during or after chemotherapy. This study describes development of a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to assess the PK profile of tisotumab vedotin and microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) using data from 399 patients with solid tumors across four phase I/II trials. The ADC-MMAE model describes ADC and MMAE concentrations following intravenous administration of tisotumab vedotin. This four-compartment model comprises a two-compartment ADC model with parallel linear and Michaelis-Menten elimination, a delay compartment, and a one-compartment MMAE model. Nonspecific linear clearance of ADC was 1.42 L/day, central volume of distribution (Vc ) was 3.10 L, and median terminal half-life of ADC was 4.04 days. Apparent clearance of MMAE was 42.8 L/day, and apparent volume of distribution was 2.09 L. Terminal slope of the MMAE concentration-time curve was defined by the delay compartment rate with a half-life of 2.56 days. Patients with higher body weight and lower albumin concentration had faster ADC clearance. Male patients and those with higher body weight and lower albumin concentration had higher Vc . Body weight was the most influential covariate influencing distribution and elimination of ADC and MMAE, thus supporting weight-based dosing of tisotumab vedotin. Presence of antidrug antibodies (detected in 3.3% of patients) did not affect key PK parameters or exposures for ADC and MMAE.
Immunoconjugates , Neoplasms , Albumins , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Body Weight , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oligopeptides/pharmacokinetics , Thromboplastin/therapeutic use
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the impact work can have on healthcare workers and the importance of staff support services. Rapid guidance was published to encourage preventive and responsive support for healthcare workers. AIMS: To understand mental healthcare staff's help-seeking behaviours and access to support at work in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, to inform iterative improvements to provision of staff support. METHOD: We conducted a formative appraisal of access to support and support needs of staff in a National Health Service mental health trust. This involved 11 semi-structured individual interviews using a topic guide. Five virtual staff forums were additional sources of data. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. RESULTS: Peer-based, within-team support was highly valued and sought after. However, access to support was negatively affected by work pressures, physical distancing and perceived cultural barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare organisations need to help colleagues to support each other by facilitating open, diverse workplace cultures and providing easily accessible, safe and reflective spaces. Future research should evaluate support in the evolving work contexts imposed by COVID-19 to inform interventions that account for differences across healthcare workforces.
Treatments for melanoma have significantly advanced with the approval of targeted treatments against the BRAF/MEK pathway and immunotherapy in the form of checkpoint inhibitors. Studies have shown the effectiveness of these treatments against brain metastases. However, the optimum treatment strategy utilising CNS-directed treatments such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and neurosurgical resection is less clear. Over six years, 70 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated for brain metastases at a tertiary treatment centre. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 10.2 months. 51 patients received localised treatment; 7 resection (median OS 10 months), 11 resection and SRS (median OS 17.3 months) and 33 SRS alone (median OS 17.4 months). For patients treated with SRS those who had <2 cm3 treated had a better median OS (20.5 months) compared to those who had >2 cm3 treated (12 months). 69 Patients received systemic treatment. The median OS of patients who did not have CNS-directed treatment was poor (median OS 1.2 months). Patients treated with first line dual immunotherapy had the best median OS (26.7 months), compared to anti-PD-1 (14.1 months), ipilimumab (14.3 months) and kinase inhibitors (10.9 months). Despite advancements in treatment, the development of brain metastases in melanoma is associated with worse outcomes. A combination of CNS-directed and systemic treatment is important to improve survival. Dual immunotherapy appears to be the most effective systemic treatment and the use of SRS improved outcomes. As metastatic melanoma treatments evolve there need to be an ongoing focus to ensure these strategies adequately treat intracranial disease.
The treatment of metastatic melanoma has been revolutionised with the emergence of checkpoint inhibitors. The combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab offers the longest overall survival but is considerably more toxic than single-agent therapy. For patients who received single-agent immunotherapy it is unclear whether second-line immunotherapy is efficacious or tolerable. This study looked at outcomes for patients treated with sequential immunotherapy and compared them to patients who received dual immunotherapy. Fifty-eight patients received both Ipilimumab and an anti-PD-1 agent during the 5-year period, twenty-seven received dual immunotherapy, twenty received first-line Ipilimumab and eleven received an anti-PD-1 agent first line. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months. The 5 year survival was greatest in patients treated with dual immunotherapy (42%) compared to first-line anti-PD-1 (33.3%) and first-line Ipilimumab (0%). As second-line treatments, anti-PD-1 agents had a median OS of 16.5 months compared to Ipilimumab at 3.4 months. 77.8% of patients had grade 3/4 toxicity with dual immunotherapy compared to 10% of patients treated with first-line Ipilimumab and 0% with anti-PD-1 agents. In the second line, 72.7% of patients treated with Ipilimumab experienced grade 3/4 toxicity, compared to 20% of patients treated with second-line anti-PD-1 agents. This study suggests Ipilimumab is not efficacious in patients who progress after anti-PD-1 agents, and this sequential approach does not avoid toxicity. The emergence of new checkpoint inhibitors will hopefully provide more efficacious treatment options for patients unable to tolerate Ipilimumab.
Immunotherapy/methods , Melanoma/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is an aggressive and painful bone neoplasm in dogs. Previous studies have reported epidemiological associations suggesting that large body mass, long bone length and the genetics of certain breeds including the Rottweiler are associated with elevated osteosarcoma risk. However, these studies were often limited by selection bias and confounding factors, and have rarely offered insights into breed-associated protection for osteosarcoma. The current study includes 1756 appendicular and axial osteosarcoma cases presenting to VPG Histology (Bristol, UK) compared against a control population of 905,211 dogs without osteosarcoma from primary care electronic patient records in the VetCompass™ dataset. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis explored associations between demographic risk factors (including breed, chondrodystrophy, age, sex/neuter status, skull-shape, and body mass) and osteosarcoma of all anatomical sites. RESULTS: We identified several breeds with increased and reduced odds of osteosarcoma. At highest risk were the Rottweiler and Great Dane, with > 10 times the odds of osteosarcoma compared with crossbreds, and the Rhodesian Ridgeback, which has not featured in previous lists of at-risk breeds for osteosarcoma, and had an odds ratio of 11.31 (95% confidence interval 7.37-17.35). Breeds at lowest risk of osteosarcoma (protected breeds) included the Bichon Frise, the French Bulldog and the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, all with odd ratios of less than 0.30 compared with crossbreds. Body mass was strongly associated with osteosarcoma risk; dogs over 40 kg exhibited osteosarcoma odds of 45.44 (95% confidence interval 33.74-61.20) compared with dogs less than 10 kg. Chondrodystrophic breeds had an osteosarcoma odds ratio of 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.16) compared with non-chondrodystrophic breeds. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of strong breed-associated osteosarcoma risk and protection, suggesting a genetic basis for osteosarcoma pathogenesis. It highlights that breeds selected for long legs/large body mass are generally overrepresented amongst at-risk breeds, whilst those selected for short leg length/small body mass are generally protected. These findings could inform genetic studies to identify osteosarcoma risk alleles in canines and humans; as well as increasing awareness amongst veterinarians and owners, resulting in improved breeding practices and clinical management of osteosarcoma in dogs.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans created using three retrospectively applied planning techniques with plans delivered to patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V100 (%), prostate V150 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), urethra D30 (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans. RESULTS: Prostate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V100 (%) values and significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V100 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values. CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Brachytherapy/methods , Humans , Male , Planning Techniques , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Urethra
The purpose of this study was to establish the dose-response relationship of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), when informed by radiobiological sensitivity parameters derived from mCRC cell lines exposed to 90Y. Methods: Twenty-three mCRC patients with liver metastases refractory to chemotherapy were included. 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT images were transformed into dose maps assuming the local dose deposition method. Baseline and follow-up CT scans were segmented to derive liver and tumor volumes. Mean, median, and D70 (minimum dose to 70% of tumor volume) values determined from dose maps were correlated with change in tumor volume and volumetric RECIST response using linear and logistic regression, respectively. Radiosensitivity parameters determined by clonogenic assays of mCRC cell lines HT-29 and DLD-1 after exposure to 90Y or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 6 MV photons) were used in biologically effective dose (BED) calculations. Results: Mean administered radioactivity was 1,469 ± 428 MBq (range, 847-2,185 MBq), achieving a mean absorbed radiation dose to tumor of 35.5 ± 9.4 Gy and mean normal liver dose of 26.4 ± 6.8 Gy. A 1.0 Gy increase in mean, median, and D70 absorbed dose was associated with a reduction in tumor volume of 1.8%, 1.8%, and 1.5%, respectively, and an increased probability of a volumetric RECIST response (odds ratio, 1.09, 1.09, and 1.10, respectively). Threshold mean, median and D70 doses for response were 48.3, 48.8, and 41.8 Gy, respectively. EBRT-equivalent BEDs for 90Y are up to 50% smaller than those calculated by applying protraction-corrected radiobiological parameters derived from EBRT alone. Conclusion: Dosimetric studies have assumed equivalence between 90Y SIRT and EBRT, leading to inflation of BED for SIRT and possible undertreatment. Radiobiological parameters for 90Y were applied to a BED model, providing a calculation method that has the potential to improve assessment of tumor control.
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Aged , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiobiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
The large heterogeneity in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is driving the exploration of predictive biomarkers to identify patients who will respond to such treatment. We extended our previously suggested modeling framework of atezolizumab pharmacokinetics, IL18, and tumor size (TS) dynamics, to also include overall survival (OS). Baseline and model-derived variables were explored as predictors of OS in 88 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab. To investigate the impact of follow-up length on the inclusion of predictors of OS, four different censoring strategies were applied. The time-course of TS change was the most significant predictor in all scenarios, whereas IL18 was not significant. Identified predictors of OS were similar regardless of censoring strategy, although OS was underpredicted when patients were censored 5 months after last dose. The study demonstrated that the tumor-time course-OS relationship could be identified based on early phase I data.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Models, Biological , Survival Rate , Time Factors
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive cancer arising from the bile ducts with a need for earlier diagnosis and a greater range of treatment options. KRAS/NRAS mutations are common in ICC tumours and 6-32% of patients also have isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) gene mutations associated with metabolic changes. This feasibility study investigated sequencing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) combined with metabolite profiling of plasma as a method for biomarker discovery in ICC patients. Plasma was collected from four ICC patients receiving radio-embolisation and healthy controls at multiple time points. ctDNA was sequenced using Ampliseq cancer hotspot panel-v2 on Ion Torrent PGM for single nucleotide variants (SNV) detection and with Illumina whole genome sequencing for copy number variants (CNV) and further targeted examination for SNVs. Untargeted analysis of metabolites from patient and control plasma was performed using liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Metabolite identification was performed using multi-parameter comparisons with analysis of authentic standards, and univariate statistical analysis was performed to identify differences in metabolite abundance between patient and control samples. Recurrent somatic SNVs and CNVs were identified in ctDNA from three out of four patients that included both NRAS and IDH1 mutations linked to ICC. Plasma metabolite analysis revealed biomarker metabolites associated with ICC and in particular 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) levels were elevated in both samples from the only patient showing a variant allele in IDH1. A reduction in the number of CNVs was observed with treatment. This study demonstrates that ctDNA and metabolite levels can be identified and correlated in ICC patient blood samples and differentiated from healthy controls. We conclude that combining genomic and metabolic analysis of plasma offers an effective approach to biomarker identification with potential for disease stratification and early detection studies.
BACKGROUND: The iMATRIX-atezolizumab study was a phase I/II, multicenter, open-label study designed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients. We describe the pharmacokinetics (PK), exposure-safety, and immunogenicity of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adults with metastatic solid tumors or hematologic malignancies enrolled in this study. METHODS: Patients aged < 18 years (n = 69) received a weight-adjusted dose of atezolizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks [q3w]; maximum 1200 mg); those aged ≥ 18 years (n = 18) received a flat dose (1200 mg q3w). A prior two-compartment intravenous infusion input adult population-PK (popPK) model of atezolizumab was used as a basis to model pediatric data. RESULTS: A total of 431 atezolizumab serum concentrations from 87 relapse-refractory pediatric and young adult patients enrolled in the iMATRIX-atezolizumab study were used for the popPK analysis. The dataset comprised predominantly patients aged < 18 years, including two infants aged < 2 years, with a wide body weight and age range. The clearance and volume of distribution estimates of atezolizumab were 0.217 L/day and 3.01 L, respectively. Atezolizumab geometric mean trough exposures were ~ 20% lower in pediatric patients versus young adults; this was not clinically meaningful as both groups achieved the target concentration (6 µg/mL). Safety was similar between pediatric and young adult patients with no exposure-safety relationship observed. Limited responses (4/87) precluded an exposure-response assessment on outcomes. A comparable rate (13% vs 11%) of atezolizumab anti-drug antibodies was seen in pediatric and young adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a similar exposure-safety profile of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients, supportive of weight-based dosing in pediatric patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02541604.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Neoplasms/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Models, Biological , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/mortality , Progression-Free Survival , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
PURPOSE: To determine the exposure-response (ER) relationships between atezolizumab exposure and efficacy or safety in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial carcinoma (UC) and to identify alternative dosing regimens. METHODS: ER analyses were conducted using pooled NSCLC and UC data from phase 1 and 3 studies (PCD4989g, OAK, IMvigor211; ClinicalTrials.gov IDs, NCT01375842, NCT02008227, and NCT02302807, respectively). Objective response rate, overall survival, and adverse events were evaluated vs pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics. Population PK-simulated exposures for regimens of 840 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) and 1680 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) were compared with the approved regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) and the maximum assessed dose (MAD; 20 mg/kg q3w). Phase 3 IMpassion130 (NCT02425891) data were used to validate the PK simulations for 840 mg q2w. Observed safety data were evaluated by exposure and body weight subgroups. RESULTS: No significant ER relationships were observed for safety or efficacy. Predicted exposures for 840 mg q2w and 1680 mg q4w were comparable to 1200 mg q3w and the MAD and consistent with observed PK data from IMpassion130. Observed safety was similar between patients with a Cmax above and below the predicted Cmax for 1680 mg q4w and between patients in the lowest and upper 3 body weight quartiles. CONCLUSION: Atezolizumab regimens of 840 mg q2w and 1680 mg q4w are expected to have comparable efficacy and safety as the approved regimen of 1200 mg q3w, supporting their interchangeable use and offering patients greater flexibility.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Models, Biological , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Computer Simulation , Datasets as Topic , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Neoplasms/mortality
Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) is an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase being investigated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX). This study interrogated the potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions between fenebrutinib and MTX. Eighteen healthy male subjects were enrolled in the study. They received a single oral dose of MTX (7.5 mg) on day 1 followed by a 13-day washout period. Subsequently, on days 15-20 the participants received 200 mg of fenebrutinib twice daily. On day 21, they received a 7.5 mg dose of MTX and a 200 mg dose of fenebrutinib under fasting conditions. The geometric mean ratios of MTX area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and C max on day 21 relative to day 1 (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.96 (0.88-1.04) and 1.05 (0.94-1.18), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of fenebrutinib AUC and C max for day 21 relative to day 20 (90% CI) were 1.03 (0.95-1.11) and 1.02 (0.90-1.15), respectively. The combination treatment was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that reported in other MTX trials. These results indicate that there is no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between fenebrutinib and MTX.
Antirheumatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Methotrexate/pharmacokinetics , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Pyridones/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/adverse effects
The FOXFIRE (5-Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin and Folinic acid ± Interventional Radio-Embolisation) clinical trial combined systemic chemotherapy (OxMdG: Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folic acid) with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT or radio-embolisation) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in the first-line management for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We report clinical outcomes for patients having hepatic resection after this novel combination therapy and an exploratory analysis of histopathology. Multi-Disciplinary Teams deemed all patients inoperable before trial registration and reassessed them during protocol therapy. Proportions were compared using Chi-squared tests and survival using Cox models. FOXFIRE randomised 182 participants to chemotherapy alone and 182 to chemotherapy with SIRT. There was no statistically significant difference in the resection rate between groups: Chemotherapy alone was 18%, (n = 33); SIRT combination was 21% (n = 38) (p = 0.508). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the rate of liver surgery, nor in survival from time of resection (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-2.89). In the subgroup studied for histopathology, microsphere density was highest at the tumour periphery. Patients treated with SIRT plus chemotherapy displayed lower values of viable tumour in comparison to those treated with chemotherapy alone (p < 0.05). This study promotes the feasibility of hepatic resection following SIRT. Resin microspheres appear to preferentially distribute at the tumour periphery and may enhance tumour regression.
