Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.791
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 539, 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39143527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incidence of complications following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) during vaginal delivery are poorly defined. They are only studied in high level maternities, small cohorts, all stages of perineal tear or in low-income countries. The aim of our study was to describe complications after primary OASI repair following a vaginal delivery in all French maternity wards at short and midterm and to assess factors associated with complication occurrence. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study using the French nationwide claim database (PMSI) from January 2013 to December 2021. All women who sustained an OASI repair following a vaginal delivery were included and virtually followed-up for 2 years. Then, we searched for OASIS complications. Finally, we evaluated factors associated with OASIS complication repaired or not and OASIS complication repairs. RESULTS: Among the 61,833 included women, 2015 (2.8%) had an OASI complication and 842 (1.16%) underwent an OASI complication repair. Women were mainly primiparous (71.6%) and 44.3% underwent an instrumental delivery. During a follow-up of 2 years, 0.6% (n = 463), 0.3% (n = 240), 0.2% (n = 176), 0.1% (n = 84), 0.06% (n = 43) and 0.01% (n = 5) of patients underwent second surgery for a perineal repair, a fistula repair, a sphincteroplasty, a perineal infection, a colostomy and a sacral nervous anal stimulation, respectively. Only one case of artificial anal sphincter was noticed. Instrumental deliveries (OR = 1.56 CI95%[1.29;1.9]), private for-profit hospitals (OR = 1.42 [1.11;1.82], reference group "public hospital"), obesity (OR = 1.36 [1;1.84]), stage IV OASIS (OR = 2.98 [2.4;3.72]), perineal wound breakdown (OR = 2.8 [1.4;5.48]), ages between 25 and 29 years old (OR = 1.59 [1.17;2.18], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") and 30 and 34 years old (OR = 1.57 [1.14; 2.16], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") were factors associated with OASIS complication repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal age, stage IV OASIS, obesity, instrumental deliveries and private for-profit hospitals seemed to predict OASIS complications. Understanding factors associated with OASIS complications could be beneficial for the patient to inform them and to influence the patient's follow-up in order to prevent complications, repairs and maternal distress.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Parto Obstétrico , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Humanos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Canal Anal/cirugía , Francia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Perineo/lesiones , Perineo/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto Joven , Laceraciones/etiología , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Laceraciones/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia
2.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 22(1): 73-79, 2024 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is a complication of vaginal delivery, if left untreated, causes significant maternal morbidities; urinary problems and fecal/ flatus incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and describe the obstetric characteristics and functional outcomes of women who had vaginal delivery at Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital Nepal and sustained Obstetric anal sphincter injury. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included women who had vaginal delivery, irrespective of parity, in the labor room or birthing unit of Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital from April 2018 to September 2020, and sustained Grade III or IV Obstetric anal sphincter injury after 28 weeks period of gestation. Maternal characteristics, obstetric details and perineal status after vaginal delivery were noted after review of hospital records. The patients were further inquired via telephone for their current status of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. RESULTS: The incidence of OASI was 106 (0.33%) among 31, 786 Nepalese women with vaginal birth over a 2-year period. The mean age women with Obstetric anal sphincter injury was 24.6 ± 4.3 years and 45(52.9%) cases belonged to Janajati ethnicity. Fifty two (61.2 %) were primipara and 77 (90.6%) had spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Episiotomy was not performed on most of the patients (63, 74.1%). Problems with flatus holding, stool holding and urine holding was reported by 28.3%, 13.2% and 22.6% women respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Obstetric anal sphincter injury among Nepalese women with vaginal birth over a 2-year period was 0.33%, which was lower than other South Asian studies. Grade III Obstetric anal sphincter injury was the frequent most type. The injuries were more common in women with Janajati ethnicity, primipara and women who did not have episiotomy. Problems with flatus holding and urine holding were present in almost one-fourth of the women with Obstetric anal sphincter injury at follow up.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Parto Obstétrico , Incontinencia Fecal , Humanos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nepal/epidemiología , Adulto , Embarazo , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incidencia , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 143-147, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865741

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prevalence of obesity in reproductive age and pregnant women has been on the rise during the past several decades. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) or episiotomy has not yet been thoroughly investigated. The objective of this study was to shed light on this issue. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed using electronic database of an obstetrics department at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. All spontaneous singleton vaginal deliveries at term between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of OASIS (third- and fourth-degree perineal tears) and obesity. These were compared across three BMI categories: normal (BMI below 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI of 30 kg/m2 and over). RESULTS: Of the overall 13,932 spontaneous vaginal deliveries identified, 34.7 % had BMI in the normal range, 43.1 % were overweight, and 25.4 % were obese. Multivariate analysis demonstrated lower rates of OASIS in obese (OR 0.2, 95 %CI 0.04-0.9) and in overweight (OR 0.3, 95 %CI 0.1-0.99) women, as compared to the normal-weight cohort. In addition, lower rates of episiotomy were noted in the obese cohort (OR 0.7, 95 %CI 0.6-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased incidence of OASIS was noted in women with obesity, in conjunction with lower use of episiotomy. These findings imply that obstetrics clinics might consider a more conservative approach to episiotomy in obese patients.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Índice de Masa Corporal , Episiotomía , Obesidad , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Humanos , Femenino , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Canal Anal/lesiones , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Perineo/lesiones , Incidencia
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 445, 2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal injury with any form of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery is very common which ranges globally from 16.2 to 90.4%. The frequency of Obstetric anal sphincter Injuries and the incidence of cervical laceration increases rapidly. However, in Ethiopia, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of maternal birth trauma and its determinant factors after vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude and associated factors of Maternal Birth Trauma after vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Gondar, North-West Ethiopia, 2022. METHODS: An Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with singleton vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 9th May to 9th August 2022 among 424 study participants. Pre-tested semi-structured questioner was utilized. Epi-Data version 4.6 was used for data entry and exported to SPSS version 25 for data management and analysis. To identify the determinant factors, binary logistic regression model was fitted and variables with p-value < 0.2 were considered for the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, Variables with P-value < 0.05 were considered to have statistical significant association with the outcome variable. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was reported to declare the statistical significance and strength of association between Maternal Birth Trauma and independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 424 mothers who delivered vaginally were included. The mean age of participants was 26.83 years (± 5.220 years). The proportion of birth trauma among mothers after vaginal delivery was47.4% (95%CI: 43.1, 51.7). Of different forms of perineal trauma, First degree tear in 42.8%, OASIs in 1.5% and Cervical laceration in 2.5% study participants. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis being primiparous (AOR = 3.00; 95%CI: 1.68, 5.38), Gestational age ≥ 39 weeks at delivery (AOR = 2.96; 95%CI: 1.57, 5.57), heavier birth weight (AOR = 12.3; 95%CI: 7.21, 40.1), bigger head circumference (AOR = 5.45; 95%CI: 2.62, 11.31), operative vaginal delivery (AOR = 6.59; 95%CI: 1.44, 30.03) and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head support (AOR = 6.30; 95%CI: 2.21, 17.94) were significantly associated with the presence of maternal birth trauma. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery was relatively high in this study. Prim parity, gestational age beyond 39 weeks at delivery, heavier birth weight, bigger head circumference, operative vaginal delivery and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head supported were factors affecting perineal outcome. The Ministry of Health of Ethiopia should provide regular interventional training as to reduce maternal birth trauma.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Humanos , Femenino , Etiopía/epidemiología , Adulto , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Factores de Riesgo , Perineo/lesiones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Canal Anal/lesiones , Traumatismos del Nacimiento/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Nacimiento/etiología , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Laceraciones/etiología
5.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(878): 1145-1150, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867558

RESUMEN

Perineal injuries can occur during vaginal delivery and they are harmful to anal function, sexuality, and overall quality of life of patients. Among the feared complications, anal incontinence, often difficult to address for both patients and caregivers, has a significant impact and must be looked for during the medical history. Clinical examination of the perineum and additional tests such as endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry confirm the diagnosis and guide the management. Treatment often relies on multiple modalities and depends on the interval between obstetric trauma and symptom onset. When indicated, perineal reconstruction surgery restores anatomy and function.


Des lésions périnéales peuvent survenir lors d'un accouchement par voie basse et avoir des conséquences néfastes sur la fonction anale, la sexualité et la qualité de vie globale des patientes. Parmi les complications redoutées, l'incontinence anale, souvent difficile à aborder pour les patientes et les soignants, a un retentissement important et doit être recherchée lors de l'anamnèse. L'examen clinique du périnée et les examens complémentaires tels que l'échographie endoanale et la manométrie anorectale permettent de confirmer le diagnostic et d'orienter la prise en charge. Le traitement repose souvent sur plusieurs modalités et dépend du délai entre le traumatisme obstétrical et la survenue des symptômes. Lorsqu'elle est indiquée, la chirurgie de reconstruction du périnée permet de restaurer l'anatomie et de rétablir la fonction.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Perineo , Humanos , Femenino , Perineo/lesiones , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/diagnóstico , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Canal Anal/lesiones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Calidad de Vida
6.
BMJ ; 385: e079014, 2024 06 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of lateral episiotomy, compared with no episiotomy, on obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction. DESIGN: A multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Eight hospitals in Sweden, 2017-23. PARTICIPANTS: 717 nulliparous women with a single live fetus of 34 gestational weeks or more, requiring vacuum extraction were randomly assigned (1:1) to lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy using sealed opaque envelopes. Randomisation was stratified by study site. INTERVENTION: A standardised lateral episiotomy was performed during the vacuum extraction, at crowning of the fetal head, starting 1-3 cm from the posterior fourchette, at a 60° (45-80°) angle from the midline, and 4 cm (3-5 cm) long. The comparison was no episiotomy unless considered indispensable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery (EVA) trial was obstetric anal sphincter injury, clinically diagnosed by combined visual inspection and digital rectal and vaginal examination. The primary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat population that included all consenting women with attempted or successful vacuum extraction. As a result of an interim analysis at significance level P<0.01, the primary endpoint was tested at 4% significance level with accompanying 96% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From 1 July 2017 to 15 February 2023, 717 women were randomly assigned: 354 (49%) to lateral episiotomy and 363 (51%) to no episiotomy. Before vacuum extraction attempt, one woman withdrew consent and 14 had a spontaneous birth, leaving 702 for the primary analysis. In the intervention group, 21 (6%) of 344 women sustained obstetric anal sphincter injury, compared with 47 (13%) of 358 women in the comparison group (P=0.002). The risk difference was -7.0% (96% CI -11.7% to -2.5%). The risk ratio adjusted for site was 0.47 (96% CI 0.23 to 0.97) and unadjusted risk ratio was 0.46 (0.28 to 0.78). No significant differences were noted between groups in postpartum pain, blood loss, neonatal outcomes, or total adverse events, but the intervention group had more wound infections and dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral episiotomy can be recommended for nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction to significantly reduce the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02643108.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Episiotomía , Paridad , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración , Humanos , Femenino , Episiotomía/métodos , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/efectos adversos , Adulto , Canal Anal/lesiones , Suecia , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Laceraciones/prevención & control , Laceraciones/etiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(6): 1183-1189, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a major complication associated with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors related to vacuum extraction that are associated with OASI. METHODS: This was a case-control study performed at a tertiary university teaching hospital. Included were patients aged 18-45 years who had a singleton pregnancy resulting in a live, term, VAVD. The study group consisted of women diagnosed with OASI following vacuum extraction. The control group included women following VAVD without OASI. Matching at a ratio of 1:2 was performed. Groups were compared regarding demographic, obstetric. and labor-related parameters, specifically focusing on variables related to the vacuum procedure itself. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients within the study group and 212 within the control group were included in the final analysis. Patients in the OASI group were more likely to undergo induction of labor, use of oxytocin during labor, increased second stage of labor, higher likelihood of the operator being a resident, increased number of pulls, procedure lasting under 10 min, occipito-posterior head position at vacuum initiation, episiotomy, increased neonatal head circumference, and birthweight. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that increased week of gestation (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25-2.22, p < 0.001), unsupervised resident performing the procedure (OR 4.63, 95% CI 2.17-9.90), p < 0.001), indication of VAVD being fetal distress (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.04-7.10, p = 0.041), and length of procedure under 10 min (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.53-14.68, p = 0.007) were associated with OASI. Increased maternal age was associated with lower risk of OASI (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: When performing VAVD, increased week of gestation, unsupervised resident performing the procedure, fetal distress as vacuum indication, and vacuum procedure under 10 min were associated with OASI. In contrast, increased maternal age was shown to be a protective factor.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración , Humanos , Femenino , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/efectos adversos , Canal Anal/lesiones , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto
8.
BJOG ; 131(10): 1378-1384, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628047

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether perineal wound complications in the first birth, alone or in conjunction with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), is associated with an increased risk of OASI in the second birth. DESIGN: Nationwide population-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden. POPULATION: Women (n = 411 317) with first and second singleton vaginal births in Sweden, 2001-2019. METHODS: Data on diagnostic codes and surgical procedures were retrieved from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the Swedish Patient Register. A perineal wound complication was defined as wound infection, dehiscence or perineal haematoma within 2 months of childbirth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between wound complications in the first birth and OASI in the second birth were investigated with logistic regression and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: In total, 2619 (0.6%) women had a wound complication in the first birth, and 5318 (1.3%) had an OASI in the second birth. Women with a wound complication but no OASI in the first birth had more than doubled odds of OASI in the second birth (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 2.11-3.53). Women with OASI and a wound complication in the first birth had almost tenfold odds (aOR 9.97, 95% CI 6.53-15.24) of recurrent OASI. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal wound complication in the first birth increases the likelihood of OASI in a subsequent birth.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Perineo , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Embarazo , Suecia/epidemiología , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Hematoma/epidemiología , Hematoma/etiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 35(1): 33-36, mar. 2024. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1551665

RESUMEN

Introducción: El traumatismo anorrectal es una causa poco frecuente de consulta al servicio de emergencias, con una incidencia del 1 al 3%. A menudo está asociado a lesiones potencialmente mortales, por esta razón, es fundamental conocer los principios de diagnóstico y tratamiento, así como los protocolos de atención inicial de los pacientes politraumatizados. Método: Reportamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 47 años con trauma anorrectal contuso con compromiso del esfínter anal interno y externo, tratado con reparación primaria del complejo esfinteriano con técnica de overlapping, rafia de la mucosa, submucosa y muscular del recto. A los 12 meses presenta buena evolución sin incontinencia anal. Conclusión: El tratamiento del trauma rectal, basado en el dogma de las 4 D (desbridamiento, derivación fecal, drenaje presacro, lavado distal) fue exitoso. La técnica de overlapping para la lesión esfinteriana fue simple y efectiva para la reconstrucción anatómica y funcional. (AU)


Introduction: Anorectal trauma is a rare cause of consultation to the Emergency Department, with an incidence of 1 to 3%. It is often associated with life-threatening injuries, so it is essential to know the principles of diagnosis and treatment, as well as the initial care protocols for the polytrau-matized patient. Methods: We present the case of a 47-year-old man with a blunt anorectal trauma involving the internal and external anal sphincter, treated with primary overlapping repair of the sphincter complex and suturing of the rectal wall. At 12 months the patient presents good outcome, without anal incontinence. Conclusion: The treatment of rectal trauma, based on the 4 D ́s dogma (debridement, fecal diversion, presacral drainage, distal rectal washout lavage) was successful. Repair of the overlapping sphincter injury was simple and effective for anatomical and functional reconstruction. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canal Anal/cirugía , Canal Anal/lesiones , Recto/cirugía , Recto/lesiones , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Proctoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(7): 1386-1395, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553803

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Data concerning the mechanical properties of the perineum during delivery are very limited. In vivo experiments raise ethical issues. The aim of the study was to describe some of the biomechanical properties of each perineal tissue layer collected from sows in order to better understand perineal tears during childbirth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Samples of each perineal tissue layer were obtained from the skin, the vagina, the external anal sphincter (EAS), the internal anal sphincter (IAS), and the anal mucosa of fresh dead sows. They were tested in quasi-static uniaxial tension using the testing machine Mach-1®. Tests were performed at a displacement velocity of 0.1 mm·s-1. Stress-strain curves of each perineal tissue layer before the first damage for each sow were obtained and modeled using a hyperelastic Yeoh model described by three coefficients: C1, C2, and C3. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the correlation between the C1 hyperelastic coefficient and the duration between the first microfailure and the complete rupture for each perineal tissue layer. Pearson correlation was computed between C1 and the number of microfailures before complete rupture for each tissue. RESULTS: Ten samples of each perineal tissue layer were analyzed. Mean values of C1 and corresponding standard deviations were 46 ± 15, 165 ± 60, 27 ± 10, 19 ± 13, 145 ± 28 kPa for the perineal skin, the vagina, the EAS, the IAS, and the anal mucosa, respectively. According to this same sample order, the first microfailure in the population of 10 sows appeared at an average of 54%, 27%, 70%, 131%, and 22% of strain. A correlation was found between C1 hyperelastic coefficient and the duration between the first microfailure and the complete rupture (r = 0.7, p = 0.02) or the number of microfailures before complete rupture only for the vagina (r = 0.7, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of fresh dead sow's perineum, the vagina and the anal mucosa were the stiffest tissues. The IAS and EAS were more extensible and less stiff. A significantly positive correlation was found between C1 and the duration between the first microfailure and the complete rupture of the vagina, and the duration between the first microfailure and the complete rupture of the vagina.


Asunto(s)
Perineo , Perineo/lesiones , Animales , Femenino , Porcinos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Embarazo , Parto Obstétrico , Técnicas In Vitro , Canal Anal/lesiones , Vagina/lesiones
12.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(5): 955-965, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523161

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the prevalence of levator ani avulsion (LAA) among primiparous women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and how this association could affect future pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed/EMBASE) were searched in December 2018 and again in October 2022. Nine full-text articles were included in the analysis. The exclusion criteria were language other than English, studies not based on primiparous women only, conference abstracts, and evaluation without ultrasound or MRI. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of LAA was 24% (95% CI: 18-30%). Those with OASI, were at a higher risk of LAA, OR 3.49 (95% CI: 1.46 to 8.35). In women with LAA + OASI versus OASI alone, Three of Five studies showed worsened AI symptoms. Three of Five studies assessing urinary incontinence (UI) reported no significant difference in UI, whereas two reported increased UI. All studies that looked at pelvic organ prolapse reported a higher incidence of symptomatic prolapse and reduced pelvic floor muscle strength in women with LAA + OASI compared with those without LAA. CONCLUSION: Levator ani avulsion is prevalent following vaginal birth and is strongly associated with OASI. Incidence of AI does not increase in women with LAA and OASI, but they had greater symptom bother. OASI with LAA appears to increase the incidence of pelvic floor weakness and pelvic organ prolapse. There is no consensus agreement on the effect of LAA + OASI on UI.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Prevalencia , Embarazo , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/etiología , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/epidemiología , Diafragma Pélvico/lesiones , Diafragma Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
13.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 69(4): 499-513, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507603

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Efforts to reduce primary cesarean birth may include supporting longer second stages of labor. Although midwifery-led care is associated with lower cesarean use, little has been published on associated outcomes of prolonged second stage (≥3 hours of pushing) for nulliparous individuals in US hospital-based midwifery care. Epidural analgesia and the role of passive descent in midwifery-led care are also underexplored in relation to the second stage. In this study, we report the incidence of prolonged second stage stratified by epidural analgesia and/or passive descent. Secondary aims included calculating the odds of cesarean birth, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and neonatal complications. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from a single academic center in the United States from 2012 through 2019. Our cohort analysis of labors attended by midwives for nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex pregnancies included both descriptive and inferential statistics comparing outcomes between prolonged versus nonprolonged pushing groups. We stratified the sample and quantified second stage outcomes by epidural analgesia and by use of passive descent. RESULTS: Of the 1465 births, 17% (n = 247) included prolonged pushing. Cesarean ranged from 2.2% without prolonged pushing to 26.7% with prolonged pushing. Fetal malposition, epidural analgesia, and longer passive descent were more common among those with prolonged active pushing. Despite these factors, neither odds for PPH nor poor neonatal outcomes were associated with prolonged pushing. Those with more than one hour of passive descent in the second stage who also had prolonged active pushing had lower odds for cesarean but higher odds for OASI relative to those who had little passive descent before pushing for more than 3 hours. DISCUSSION: Prolonged pushing occurred in nearly 2 of 10 nulliparous labors. Fetal malposition, epidural analgesia, and prolonged pushing were commonly observed with longer passive descent, cesarean, and OASI. Passive descent in these data likely reflects individualized midwifery care strategies when pushing was complicated by fetal malposition or other complexities.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Cesárea , Partería , Paridad , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Analgesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Analgesia Obstétrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Canal Anal/lesiones , Estudios de Cohortes , Estados Unidos
14.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 294: 238-244, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the postnatal psychological health and parenting adjustment of primiparous women experiencing perineal trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study assessing body image, perceptions of traumatic birth, psychological distress, perineal pain, impact upon parental tasks and mother-infant bonding at 6-12 weeks (n = 103) and 6-10 months postnatally (n = 91). Primiparous women were recruited following vaginal birth and perineal suturing in a UK-based maternity hospital. al. Comparisons made according to the objective classification of perineal trauma experienced; 1st/2nd degree tear, episiotomy, and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASI). RESULTS: At 6-12 weeks women with an episiotomy reported a more negative perception of their body image than those with OASI. Women with OASI or an episiotomy were more likely to have experienced birth as traumatic, and those with OASI reported more avoidance symptoms of post-traumatic stress and a greater negative impact on parenting tasks. At 6-10 months significantly more avoidance symptoms continued to be reported by those with OASI, whereas those with an episiotomy reported more anxiety related symptoms in general than those with OASI. CONCLUSIONS: OASI, whilst associated with traumatic birth and some early parenting impacts, may not be linked to general negative psychological outcomes when specialist routine follow-up care is provided. Psychological impacts for women with episiotomy may merit further input than currently provided. Consideration should be given with regards to widening the access to postnatal perineal care by extending the criteria for specialist follow up beyond those sustaining OASI.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Nacimiento , Laceraciones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Episiotomía/métodos , Madres , Canal Anal/lesiones , Vagina , Laceraciones/etiología , Perineo/lesiones , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología
15.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(1): 426-434, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are severe complications to vaginal births with potential long-term consequences. Maternal origin has been proposed to affect the overall risk, but the association and underlying explanation are uncertain. The objective was to assess the association between maternal country of birth and OASIS. METHODS: A Swedish nationwide cohort study including singleton term vaginal births during 2005-2016. Data were extracted from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and Statistics Sweden. Modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to obtain crude and adjusted risk ratios (RRs). Adjustments were made in four cumulative steps. Sub-analyses were performed to investigate the risk of OASIS associated with female genital circumcision (FGC). RESULTS: In all, 988 804 births were included. The rate of OASIS in Swedish-born women was 3.5%. Women from East/Southeast Asia had an increased risk of OASIS (adjusted RR [aRR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-1.83), as did women born in Sub-Saharan Africa (aRR 1.60, 95% CI 1.49-1.72). The risk remained significantly increased also after adjustment for maternal height. By contrast, women from South/Central America had a decreased risk of OASIS (aRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76). FGC was associated with an increased risk of OASIS (aRR 3.05, 95% CI 2.60-3.58). Episiotomy appeared to have an overall protective effect (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98), but not significantly more protective among women with female genital mutilation. CONCLUSIONS: Country of birth plays an important role in the risk of OASIS. Women from East/Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are at significantly increased risk as compared with Swedish-born women, whereas women from South/Central America are at lower risk. FGC is also a significant risk factor for OASIS.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Humanos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Suecia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Circuncisión Femenina/efectos adversos , Circuncisión Femenina/estadística & datos numéricos , África del Sur del Sahara , Sistema de Registros , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto Joven , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Asia Sudoriental , Asia Oriental , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos
16.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 46(5): 102415, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387834

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify variation in the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) by maternity care provider in spontaneous and operative vaginal deliveries (SVDs and OVDs). METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of vaginal, term deliveries among nullipara in Canada (2004-2015). Adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-binomial regression to quantify the associations between episiotomy and OASI, stratified by care provider (obstetrician [OB], family physician [FP], or registered midwife [RM]) while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The study included 631 642 deliveries. Episiotomy use varied by provider: among SVDs, the episiotomy rate was 19.6%, 14.4%, and 8.4% in the OB, FP, and RM groups, respectively. The rate of OASI was higher among SVDs with versus without episiotomy (5.8% vs 4.6%). Conversely, OASI occurred less frequently in operative vaginal deliveries with episiotomy (15.3%) compared with those without (16.7%). In all provider groups, the ARR for OASI was increased with episiotomy in SVD and decreased with episiotomy with forceps delivery. No differences in these associations were observed by provider except among vacuum delivery (ARR with episiotomy vs. without, OB: 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; FP: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, RM: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: In nullipara, irrespective of maternity care provider, there is a positive association between episiotomy and OASI among SVDs and an inverse association between episiotomy and deliveries with forceps. The relationship between episiotomy and OASI is modified by maternity care providers among vacuum deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Episiotomía , Paridad , Humanos , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38422604

RESUMEN

Birth related perineal trauma (BRPT) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are leading causes of anal incontinence in women, which negatively impacts on their quality of life, resulting in low self-esteem and abandonment. In low resource countries (LRC), the true incidence is not known and since most births are unattended or occur in community-based health care systems, one can anticipate that it is a significant problem. Dissemination of information to women, education of traditional birth attendants, improvement of resources and transport, and training of health professionals on the detection and appropriate surgical management of these injuries will reduce morbidity and improve outcome. Intrapartum measures such as controlled head descent and perineal support, correct episiotomy techniques and selective use of instruments to assist vaginal births is pivotal in avoiding these injuries. Policy makers should prioritize maternity care in LRC, and research is urgently needed to address all aspects of BRPT.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Parto Obstétrico , Países en Desarrollo , Episiotomía , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Perineo , Humanos , Femenino , Perineo/lesiones , Embarazo , Canal Anal/lesiones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Laceraciones/etiología
18.
BJOG ; 131(8): 1129-1135, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38247347

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To create a sensorised surgical glove that can accurately identify obstetric anal sphincter injury to facilitate timely repair, reduce complications and aid training. DESIGN: Proof-of-concept. SETTING: Laboratory. SAMPLE: Pig models. METHODS: Flexible triboelectric pressure/force sensors were mounted onto the fingertips of a routine surgical glove. The sensors produce a current when rubbed on materials of different characteristics which can be analysed. A per rectum examination was performed on the intact sphincter of pig cadavers, analogous to routine examination for obstetric anal sphincter injuries postpartum. An anal sphincter defect was created by cutting through the vaginal mucosa and into the external anal sphincter using a scalpel. The sphincter was then re-examined. Data and signals were interpreted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of the glove in detecting anal sphincter injury. RESULTS: In all, 200 examinations were performed. The sensors detected anal sphincter injuries in a pig model with sensitivities between 98% and 100% and a specificity of 100%. The current produced when examining an intact sphincter and sphincter with a defect was significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, the sensorised glove accurately detected anal sphincter injury in a pig model. Future plans include its clinical translation, starting with an in-human study on postpartum women, to determine whether it can accurately detect different types of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vivo.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Guantes Quirúrgicos , Animales , Canal Anal/lesiones , Femenino , Porcinos , Embarazo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Laceraciones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/diagnóstico , Humanos , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual
19.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 52(2): 95-101, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219814

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department. METHODS: Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. RESULTS: We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Episiotomía , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Canal Anal/lesiones , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Recién Nacido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA