Rapid desensitization to brentuximab vedotin after severe anaphylaxis in the treatment of refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin is a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate used for the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Hypersensitivity reactions to brentuximab vedotin may include cutaneous, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal and neurological signs and symptoms. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 23-year-old Mexican female with stage IV progressive classical nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma who received multiple previous chemotherapy regimens. Brentuximab vedotin at 1.8 mg/kg (180 mg total dose), for 21-day cycles was indicated. Within 5 min of infusion of the 5th cycle of brentuximab, she developed severe anaphylaxis (hives, angioedema, diaphoresis, tachycardia, dyspnea, hypoxemia and loss of consciousness), which was successfully controlled with epinephrine, steroids and antihistamines.Management and outcome: Intradermal skin test at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml was positive. Due to the severity of the symptoms and the lack of access to alternative treatments, we performed a desensitization protocol. A total of 180 mg of brentuximab was given in three bag solutions in 12 steps, with an initial concentration dose of 1/100 of the total dose in a course of 5.56 h with no hypersensitivity reactions. DISCUSSION: Severe anaphylaxis has been reported in 1.2% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin. Patients who are treated by rapid drug desensitization with their first option therapy present a favorable survival rate with better cost-effectiveness in comparison to second-line treatment.

Anafilaxia y anafiláctico / Anaphilactic shock and anaphilaxis

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening clinical condition that results from the activation of mast cells/basophils, inflammatory pathways, or both. It can be specific (allergic), or non-specific (non-allergic). Most anaphylaxis are mediated by IgE, but there are also some mediated by IgM and complement activation. Incidence is about 1:10,000 anesthesia. Recent studies show that the drugs or substances mostly implicated in producing perioperative anaphylaxis are: neuromuscular blockers (60.6%), antibiotics (18.2%), patent blue dye (5.4%) and latex (5.2%). However, all drugs and substances used during anesthesia and surgery, perhaps with the sole exception of inhalation agents and crystalloids, have been reported as potentially causes of anaphylaxis. The clinical presentation is multisystemic, producing signs and symptoms mainly on skin, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. In its advanced phase, it may evolve to anaphylactic shock, causing tissue hypoperfusion and leading to altered cell integrity and multiple organ failure, associated with high mortality. Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation (history and clinical manifestations), biological evidence (serum tryptase levels, serum histamine levels and search for specific IgE) and allergological evidence (skin tests, provocation test, mediator release tests and tests of activation of basophils). Treatment include 3 stages: general measures, first-line or primary treatment and second-line or secondary treatment. General measures consist of: Trendelenburg position, invasive monitoring (according to the severity of the clinical presentation), 100% oxygen administration, discontinuation of drugs and/or suspected agents and asking for help. The primary treatment is epinephrine in doses proportional to the clinical manifestations, airway support, 100% oxygen and aggressive resuscitation with intravenous fluids. Secondary treatment includesadministration of bronchialodilators, corticosteroids, and antihistamines.

Una anafilaxia es una condición clínica potencialmente mortal que resulta de la activación específica (alérgica), o no específica (no alérgica) de mastocitos/ basófilos, vías inflamatorias o ambos. La mayoría de las anafilaxias son mediadas por IgE, pero también las hay por IgM y activación del complemento. Su incidencia es de 1:10.000 anestesias. En los últimos estudios, los fármacos o sustancias más implicadas en producir anafilaxia perioperatoria son los bloqueadores neuromusculares (60,6%), los antibióticos (18,2%), las tinturas azules (5,4%) y el látex (5,2%), sin embargo, todas las drogas y sustancias usadas durante la anestesia y la cirugía, tal vez con la única excepción de los agentes inhalatorios y los cristaloides, han sido reportadas como potencialmente causantes de anafilaxia. El cuadro clínico es multisistémico, originando signos y síntomas centrados en la piel y los sistemas respiratorio, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal y nervioso central. En su fase avanzada puede evolucionar a anafiláctico, causando hipoperfusión tisular y llevando a alteración en la integridad celular y falla de múltiples órganos, con alta mortalidad asociada. El diagnóstico se basa en evidencias clínicas (historia y manifestaciones clínicas), evidencias biológicas (niveles de triptasa sérica, de histamina sérica y búsqueda de IgE específicas) y evidencias alergológicas (pruebas cutáneas, test de provocación, pruebas de liberación de mediadores y pruebas de activación de basófilos. El tratamiento incluye 3 etapas: medidas generales, tratamiento de primera línea o primario y tratamiento de segunda línea o secundario. Las medidas generales consisten en poner al paciente en posición de Trendelemburg, iniciar monitorización invasiva según la intensidad del cuadro clínico, administración de oxígeno al 100%, discontinuación de drogas y/o agentes posiblemente incriminados y pedir ayuda. El tratamiento primario es la adrenalina, en dosis proporcionales a las manifestaciones clínicas, el soporte de la vía aérea manteniendo el oxígeno ql 100% y la reanimación agresiva con fluidos endovenosos. El tratamiento secundario incluye la administración de broncodilatadores, corticoesteroides y antihistamínicos.

Food Allergies.

Food allergy is 1 of the 4 manifestations of the "atopic march," along with eczema, allergic rhinitis, and asthma. Depending on the pathophysiologic immune mechanisms behind a food allergy, it can be classified as immunoglobulin E-mediated, non-immunoglobulin E-mediated, or mixed. The prevalence of food allergies has risen worldwide during the past few decades, becoming a significant global health concern. Patients experiencing food allergies and their caregivers are heavily burdened personally, socially, emotionally, and financially. The health-care system is also considerably affected. Pediatricians, as primary health-care providers, are often challenged with these patients, becoming the first-line for the recognition and management of food allergies. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of food allergies, including the most up-to-date information, recent guidelines, and recommendations.

[Clinical Practice Guide for Anaphylaxis in Latin America (Galaxia-Latam)]. / Guía de Actuación en Anafilaxia en Latinoamérica. Galaxia-Latam.

Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction with a rapid onset and it is potentially life-threatening. Its clinical manifestations are varied; they may affect the skin, the cardiovascular system, the respiratory system, and the digestive system, among others. The treatment of choice, which is an intra-muscular injection of epinephrine (adrenaline), must be applied promptly. Therefore, being prepared to recognize it properly is of crucial importance. The objective of this clinical practice guide is to improve the knowledge of health professionals about anaphylaxis and, consequently, to optimize the treatment and long-term management of this reaction. This guide is adapted to the peculiarities of Latin America; especially in matters regarding the treatment. The need to introduce epinephrine auto-injectors in countries that don't have them yet is highlighted.

La anafilaxia es una reacción alérgica grave de instauración rápida y potencialmente mortal. Sus manifestaciones clínicas son muy variadas, pudiendo afectar la piel, el sistema cardiovascular, el aparato respiratorio y el digestivo, entre otros. El tratamiento de elección, mediante la inyección intramuscular de adrenalina, debe ser precoz. Por lo anterior, es vital estar preparados para reconocerla adecuadamente. El objetivo de la presente guía de actuación clínica es mejorar el conocimiento de los profesionales sanitarios sobre anafilaxia y, consecuentemente, optimizar el tratamiento y manejo a largo plazo de esta entidad. La guía está adaptada a las peculiaridades de América Latina, especialmente en los aspectos relativos al tratamiento. Se destaca la necesidad de introducir los autoinyectores de adrenalina en los países que no dispongan de ellos.

[Evaluation of diagnostic and management concepts of anaphylaxis in non-allergist physicians in Colombia]. / Evaluación de los conceptos diagnósticos y de manejo de la anafilaxia en médicos no alergólogos de Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Several reports show deficiencies in the knowledge of physicians about the diagnostic criteria and the treatment of anaphylaxis, a condition that can have fatal consequences. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of physicians in Colombia on the fundamental aspects of anaphylaxis in diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Analytical cross-sectional study, carried out through a survey of 11 questions that evaluate clinical aspects of anaphylaxis, addressed to general practitioners and specialists in different health areas resident in Colombia. The analysis of the results was based on the correct answers. For approval, a score higher than 70% was needed. RESULTS: A total of 447 non-allergic doctors analyzed were included, of which only 110 (24.6%) approved the questionnaire in both the questions aimed at the diagnosis and in the treatment of anaphylaxis. Among the factors that were associated with the failure of the survey were the age of the doctor (p <0.01) and work at the first level of care (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Like previous studies, knowledge in the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis is scarce among Colombian physicians. The factors associated with said result are potentially modifiable.

Antecedentes: Varios reportes evidencian la necesidad de mayor conocimiento de los médicos acerca de los criterios diagnósticos y de manejo de la anafilaxia, condición que puede tener consecuencias fatales. Objetivo: Evaluar en Colombia los conocimientos de los médicos no alergólogos, acerca de los aspectos fundamentales de la anafilaxia en el diagnóstico oportuno y el tratamiento. Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado mediante una encuesta de 11 preguntas relativas a aspectos clínicos de la anafilaxia, dirigida a médicos generales y especialistas residentes en Colombia. El análisis de los resultados se hizo con base en las respuestas correctas. El corte de aprobación se estableció en > 70 %. Resultados: Se incluyeron 447 médicos no alergólogos, de los cuales solo 110 (24.6 %) aprobaron el cuestionario tanto en los aspectos diagnóstico como terapéuticos. Entre los factores asociados con reprobar la encuesta se identificó mayor edad (p < 0.01) y trabajar en el primer nivel de atención (p < 0.01). Conclusiones: Similar a lo reportado en otros estudios, el conocimiento en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la anafilaxia fue deficiente entre los médicos colombianos. Los factores asociados con estos resultados son potencialmente modificables.

Adverse immune reactions and non-immune medications for perioperative use. / Reacciones adversas inmunitarias y no inmunitarias a fármacos de uso perioperatorio.

Reactions to medications can occur through a mechanism mediated by immunoglobulin or otherwise, not both. Drug allergy is a type of adverse reaction to the drug and comprises a range of hypersensitivity reactions mediated by different immunological mechanisms with diverse clinical manifestations. A rate of 3.2 fatal cases of anaphylaxis associated with drugs per 100,000 inhabitants per year is estimated, which seems to be approximately 10 times higher in hospitalized patients. The incidence of perioperative anaphylactic reactions is estimated at 1 in 10,000-20,000 anesthetic procedures. The diagnosis is based on a careful clinical history and physical examination. In some cases, skin tests, progressive challenges and methods to induce tolerance to the medication may be required. In hospitalized patients and at perioperative intervals, muscle relaxants, neuroleptics and morphinomimetics are frequently used and adverse reactions may occur to these drugs. This review shows a general description of the reactions of these medications, emphasizes allergic reactions and analyzes strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of these reactions.

Las reacciones a medicamentos pueden ocurrir por mecanismos mediados o no por imunoglobulina E. La alergia a fármacos es un tipo de interacción adversa y comprende una gama de reacciones de hipersensibilidad mediadas por distintos mecanismos inmunológicos con diversas manifestaciones clínicas. Se estima una tasa anual de 3.2 casos fatales de anafilaxia asociados con los fármacos por cada 100 000 habitantes, que parece ser aproximadamente 10 veces mayor en los pacientes hospitalizados. La incidencia de reacciones anafilácticas perioperatorias se estima en uno de cada 10 000-20 000 procedimientos anestésicos. El diagnóstico se basa en una cuidadosa historia clínica y en el examen físico. En algunos casos pueden requerirse pruebas cutáneas, pruebas de retos progresivos y procedimientos de inducción de tolerancia al medicamento. En los pacientes hospitalizados y en el intervalo perioperatorio frecuentemente se emplean relajantes musculares, neurolépticos y morfinomiméticos, por lo que pueden presentarse respuestas adversas a estos fármacos. En esta revisión se hace énfasis en las reacciones alérgicas a los medicamentos y se abordan estrategias para su diagnóstico y manejo.

Serum Baseline Tryptase Level as a Marker for the Severity of Anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a severe and potentially fatal allergic disease or hypersensitivity reaction with variable clinical presentation. Biomarkers in anaphylaxis could be useful to improve diagnosis, to allow endotyping of patients, and to predict risk. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of serum basal tryptase (sBT) levels in the management of patients with anaphylaxis. METHODS: Patients with at least 1 episode of anaphylaxis were selected among those who attended the Allergy Clinics of the Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil, upon evaluation by allergy/immunology specialists of our medical staff. Demographic and clinical data were obtained using a structured questionnaire. sBT levels were determined using the ImmunoCAP Tryptase immunoassay. RESULTS: 57 patients (56.1% female) with a median age of 35 years (range 7-87 years) participated in the study. sBT levels ranged from 2.57 to 21.19 ng/mL (mean 5.17 ng/mL), with no significant differences in patients with anaphylaxis due to different triggers. Mean levels were 4.93; 5.2; 5.41, and 5.24 ng/mL for patients who had anaphylaxis due to Hymenoptera venom (n = 17), foods (n = 13), drugs (n = 13), and idiopathic disease (n = 14), respectively. Significantly higher sBT levels were observed in patients with severe anaphylaxis (grade IV) than in patients with mild-moderate disease (grades II/III) (mean levels 6.61 vs. 4.71 ng/mL, respectively). CONCLUSION: High sBT levels may help to identify patients at increased risk of more severe anaphylaxis, prompting physicians to initiate immediate therapy to avoid further acute episodes.

Hipersensibilidad a corticoides y manejo en asma severa. A propósito de un caso / Hipersensitivity to corticosteroids and management of severe bronchial asthma. Case study

Resumen Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a corticoides son raras en la población general, se dividen en dos categorías: Inmediatas, típicamente mediadas por Inmunoglobulina E (IgE), donde se incluye la anafilaxia luego de la administración de un fármaco en un corto período. Su prevalencia descrita es de 0,3-0,5%. Otra reacción es la 'no inmediata', que se manifiesta en un tiempo mayor de una hora después de la administración del fármaco. Se revisó la literatura con el objetivo de mejorar y aclarar el tratamiento en pacientes asmáticos que poseen esta condición. Se encontró que las vías posibles para generar estas reacciones son intranasal, aerosol por inhalador, oral y parenteral. Frente a esta condición se requiere una evaluación estrecha y detallada de la historia clínica, síntomas y reacciones secundarias al fármaco sospechoso. Finalmente, al momento de elegir tipo de corticoide a usar es primordial la seguridad del paciente logrando, además, el control de la enfermedad.

Hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids are rare in the general population, they fall into two categories: 'immediate', typically mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE), which includes anaphylaxis after administration of a drug in a short period of time. Its reported prevalence is 0.3-0.5%. Another reaction is 'not immediate', which manifests itself in a time longer than one hour after the administration of the drug. We reviewed the literature with the aim of improving and clarifying the treatment in asthmatic patients with this condition. It was found that the possible routes to generate these reactions are intranasal, aerosol by inhaler, oral and parenteral. Facing this condition requires a close and detailed evaluation of the clinical history, symptoms and side reactions to the suspected drug. Finally, when choosing which corticosteroid to use, the patient's safety is paramount, and control of the disease is also essential.

Severe forms of food allergy.

OBJECTIVES: To guide the diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe forms of food allergy. DATA SOURCES: Search in the Medline database using the terms "severe food allergy," "anaphylaxis and food allergy," "generalized urticaria and food allergy," and "food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome" in the last ten years, searching in the title, abstract, or keyword fields. SUMMARY OF DATA: Food allergy can be serious and life-threatening. Milk, eggs, peanuts, nuts, walnuts, wheat, sesame seeds, shrimp, fish, and fruit can precipitate allergic emergencies. The severity of reactions will depend on associated cofactors such as age, drug use at the onset of the reaction, history and persistence of asthma and/or severe allergic rhinitis, history of previous anaphylaxis, exercise, and associated diseases. For generalized urticaria and anaphylaxis, intramuscular epinephrine is the first and fundamental treatment line. For the treatment in acute phase of food-induced enterocolitis syndrome in the emergency setting, prompt hydroelectrolytic replacement, administration of methylprednisolone and ondansetron IV are necessary. It is important to recommend to the patient with food allergy to maintain the exclusion diet, seek specialized follow-up and, in those who have anaphylaxis, to emphasize the need to carry epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Severe food allergy may occur in the form of anaphylaxis and food-protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, which are increasingly observed in the pediatric emergency room; hence, pediatricians must be alert so they can provide the immediate diagnosis and treatment.

[Training of resident physicians in the recognition and treatment of an anaphylaxis case in pediatrics with simulation models]. / Capacitación de médicos residentes en el reconocimiento y tratamiento de un caso de anafilaxia en pediatría con modelos de simulación.

OBJETIVE: To evaluate the performance of resident physicians in diagnosing and treating a case of anaphylaxis, six months after participating in simulation training exercises. METHODS: Initially, a group of pediatric residents were trained using simulation techniques in the management of critical pediatric cases. Based on their performance in this exercise, participants were assigned to one of 3 groups. At six months post-training, 4 residents were randomly chosen from each group to be re-tested, using the same performance measure as previously used. RESULTS: During the initial training session, 56 of 72 participants (78%) correctly identified and treated the case. Six months after the initial training, all 12 (100%) resident physicians who were re-tested successfully diagnosed and treated the simulated anaphylaxis case. CONCLUSIONS: The training through simulation techniques allowed correction or optimization of the treatment of simulated anaphylaxis cases in resident physicians evaluated after 6 months of the initial training.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el desempeño logrado por médicos residentes en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de un caso simulado de anafilaxia luego de 6 meses de haber recibido capacitación con técnicas de simulación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Un grupo de residentes de Pediatría fueron capacitados a través de técnicas de simulación en diferentes emergencias pediátricas (primera etapa) y luego clasificados según su grado de desempeño en 3 subgrupos. Se seleccionaron, posteriormente, 4 médicos al azar de cada subgrupo para ser reevaluados luego de 6 meses (segunda etapa). RESULTADOS: Participaron 72 médicos de la primera etapa, 56 (77,8%) resolvieron el caso correctamente. A los 6 meses, los 12 (100%) médicos evaluados trataron en forma adecuada el nuevo caso de anafilaxia. CONCLUSIONES: La capacitación a través de técnicas de simulación permitió corregir u optimizar el tratamiento de casos simulados de anafilaxia en médicos residentes evaluados luego de 6 meses de la capacitación inicial.

[Systemic reaction after performing a food prick-to-prick test. A case report]. / Reacción sistémica desencadenada por una prueba por punción cutánea con alimentos frescos. Informe de un caso.

BACKGROUND: Skin prick test is the most widely used test for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated conditions. Commercial extracts are used for its performance, but in the case of fruits and vegetables it is preferable using fresh food. Although both tests possess a good safety profile, hypersensitivity reactions have been recorded. CLINICAL CASE: Forty-seven-year old woman with a history of persistent allergic rhinitis, sensitized to the pollen of grasses, olive and salsola; she was referred to an allergology department due to anaphylaxis triggered by the consumption of avocado, cantaloupe, carrots and watermelon. Minutes after skin prick test with standardized extract and skin prick with fresh foods, she developed dyspnea, pruritus, erythema, dizziness and sibilance; she was administered 0.5 mg of intramuscular adrenalin and 4 salbutamol inhalations and placed in the Trendelemburg position. Dyspnea persisted, and vital signs monitoring showed heart and respiratory rates increase and, hence, salbutamol was applied again, together with 2 L/min of oxygen delivered by nasal cannula, intravenous fluids and 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone; improvement was observed at 40 minutes. The patient was hospitalized for 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Although skin tests are safe, the risk of hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions should not be ruled out, especially in susceptible patients.

Antecedentes: La prueba por punción epidérmica es la principal prueba para el diagnóstico de enfermedades mediadas por IgE. Para su realización se utilizan extractos comerciales; en el caso de frutas y verduras es mejor emplear alimentos frescos. Si bien ambas modalidades poseen un buen perfil de seguridad, se han registrado reacciones de hipersensibilidad. Caso clínico: Mujer de 47 años de edad con antecedentes de rinitis alérgica persistente, sensibilizada a polen de gramíneas, olivo y salsola; fue remitida a un servicio de alergología por anafilaxia desencadenada por el consumo de aguacate, melón, zanahoria y sandía. Minutos después de la punción cutánea con extracto estandarizado y punción cutánea con alimentos frescos, desarrolló disnea, prurito, eritema, mareo y sibilancias. Se le administraron 0.5 mg de adrenalina intramuscular y 4 inhalaciones de salbutamol; también fue colocada en posición de Trendelemburg. La disnea persistió y el monitoreo de los signos vitales mostró incremento de las frecuencias cardiaca y respiratoria, por lo que se aplicó nuevamente salbutamol, 2 L/min de oxígeno por cánula nasal, líquidos endovenosos y 100 mg de hidrocortisona intravenosa; a los 40 minutos se observó mejoría. La paciente fue hospitalizada durante 48 horas. Conclusiones: Aunque las pruebas cutáneas son seguras, no debe excluirse el riesgo de reacciones de hipersensibilidad y anafilaxia, especialmente en pacientes susceptibles.

Severe forms of food allergy / Formas graves de alergia alimentar

Abstract Objectives: To guide the diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe forms of food allergy. Data sources: Search in the Medline database using the terms "severe food allergy," "anaphylaxis and food allergy," "generalized urticaria and food allergy," and "food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome" in the last ten years, searching in the title, abstract, or keyword fields. Summary of data: Food allergy can be serious and life-threatening. Milk, eggs, peanuts, nuts, walnuts, wheat, sesame seeds, shrimp, fish, and fruit can precipitate allergic emergencies. The severity of reactions will depend on associated cofactors such as age, drug use at the onset of the reaction, history and persistence of asthma and/or severe allergic rhinitis, history of previous anaphylaxis, exercise, and associated diseases. For generalized urticaria and anaphylaxis, intramuscular epinephrine is the first and fundamental treatment line. For the treatment in acute phase of food-induced enterocolitis syndrome in the emergency setting, prompt hydroelectrolytic replacement, administration of methylprednisolone and ondansetron IV are necessary. It is important to recommend to the patient with food allergy to maintain the exclusion diet, seek specialized follow-up and, in those who have anaphylaxis, to emphasize the need to carry epinephrine. Conclusion: Severe food allergy may occur in the form of anaphylaxis and food-protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, which are increasingly observed in the pediatric emergency room; hence, pediatricians must be alert so they can provide the immediate diagnosis and treatment.

Resumo Objetivos: Abordar o manejo diagnóstico e terapêutico das formas graves de alergia alimentar. Fontes dos dados: Busca ativa na base de dados Medline dos termos severe food allergies, anaphylaxis and food allergy e food protein-induced enterocolitis nos últimos dez anos e com busca nos campos título, resumo ou palavra-chave. Síntese dos dados: A alergia alimentar pode ser grave e ameaçadora à vida. Leite, ovo, amendoim, castanha, noz, trigo, gergelim, crustáceo, peixe e frutas podem precipitar emergências alérgicas. A gravidade das reações vai depender de fatores associados, tais como idade, uso de medicamentos no início da reação, persistência de asma e/ou rinite alérgica grave, história de prévia anafilaxia, exercício e doenças intercorrentes. Para anafilaxia, a adrenalina intramuscular é uma indicação bem estabelecida. Para o tratamento da síndrome da enterocolite induzida pela proteína alimentar na fase aguda no setor de emergência, fazem-se necessárias a pronta reposição hidroeletrolítica e a administração de metilprednisolona e odansetrona IV. Importante recomendar ao paciente com o diagnóstico de alergia alimentar grave que mantenha a dieta de exclusão, procure acompanhamento especializado e, naqueles que apresentaram anafilaxia, enfatizar a necessidade de portar adrenalina. Conclusão: Alergia alimentar grave pode se manifestar como anafilaxia ou síndrome da enterocolite induzida por proteína alimentar em fase aguda, as quais, por serem condições cada vez mais presentes e reconhecidas no setor de emergência pediátrica, demandam diagnóstico e tratamento imediatos.

Anafilaxia / Anaphylaxis

O termo anafilaxia é amplamente utilizado para definir reações de hipersensibilidade graves e potencialmente fatais. As reações anafiláticas podem ser desencadeadas por diversos agentes etiológicos e apresentam sintomas de intensidade variável. A pronta suspeição e a conduta adequada, no atendimento de emergência, são imprescindíveis para a resolução favorável do quadro. Neste trabalho procuramos apresentar uma revisão atual sobre o diagnóstico e tratamento da anafilaxia, no contexto emergencial.

Anaphylaxia is defined as a serious, potentially fatal life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction. Anaphylaxis may be triggered by multiple agents and present with mild to severe intensity of symptoms. Prompt diagnosis and adequate treatment are vital to the resolution of the anaphylaxis. Here the authors review diagnosis criteria and emergency treatment of anaphylaxis.

Abordagem geral do choque anafilático / General approach to anaphylactic shock

Anafilaxia é uma reação de hipersensibilidade potencialmente grave, mediada por imunoglobulinas E e G, após exposição a antígeno em pessoas previamente sensibilizadas. As manifestações clínicas que provoca são multissitêmicas e inespecíficas, o que dificulta o seu diagnostico, podendo evoluir para colapso cardiovascular e insuficiência respiratória. O choque anafilático é distributivo, com importante componente hipovolêmico. A suspeição clínica imediata é fundamental, pois tem impacto no sucesso do tratamento. Este artigo objetiva rever o tema, ressaltando não apenas os sinais e sintomas clínicos e medicamentos usados, como também correlacionar a fisiopatologia com o tratamento e enfatizar a importância da prevenção adequada de novos episódios, para redução da sua incidência e morbidade.

Anaphylaxis is a potentially serious hypersensitivity reaction mediated by E and G-types immunoglobulin after exposition to antigen in previously sensitized people. It is hard to diagnose, as its clinical manifestations are unspecific and multisystemic. It can, however, progress to cardiovascular collapse and respiratory insufficiency. The anaphylactic shock is distributive, with an important hypovolemic component. Immediate clinical suspicion is crucial for treatment success. This paper aims to provide a review of the topic and highlight not only the drugs and clinical signals and symptoms, but also correlate physiopathology and treatment. It also aims to emphasize the importance of appropriate prevention of new events in order to reduce incidence and morbidity.

Anafilaxia / Anaphylaxis

La anafilaxia es una reacción alérgica severa y potencialmente fatal. La mayoría de las anafilaxias son mediadas por inmunoglobulina E. El diagnóstico se basa fundamentalmente en las manifestaciones clínicas con el compromiso de múltiples sistemas (cutáneo, cardiovascular, respiratorio y gastrointestinal). La elevación de la triptasa sérica apoya el diagnóstico de anafilaxia. La epinefrina es el fármaco de elección en el tratamiento de la anafilaxia. Es fundamental su reconocimiento, oportuno tratamiento y posterior estudio etiológico para evitar nuevos episodios.

Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction and potencially fatal. Most of reaction are mediated by immunoglobulin E. The diagnosis is based primarily on clinical manifestations with involvement of multiple systems (cutaneous, cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal). The increase of serum tryptase supports the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. . Epinephrine is the medication of choice in the treatment of anaphylaxis. It is essential its recognition, appropriate treatment and etiologic study to prevent further episodes.