Prevalence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Anticipatory nausea and vomiting are unpleasant symptoms observed before undergoing chemotherapy sessions. Less is known about the occurrence of symptoms since the advent of the new neurokinin-1 antagonist. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was performed at a single Brazilian Institution. This study included breast cancer patients who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and an appropriate antiemetic regimen (dexamethasone 10 mg, palonosetron 0.56 mg, and netupitant 300 mg in the D1 followed by dexamethasone 10 mg 12/12 h in D2 and D4). Patients used a diary to record nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication in the first two cycles of treatment. The prevalence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting was assessed before chemotherapy on day 1 of C2. RESULTS: From August 4, 2020, to August 12, 2021, 60 patients were screened, and 52 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50.8 (28-69) years, most had stage III (53.8%), and most received chemotherapy with curative intent (94%). During the first cycle, the frequency of overall nausea and vomiting was 67.31%, and that of severe nausea and vomiting (defined as grade>4 on a 10-point visual scale or use of rescue medication) was 55.77%. Ten patients had anticipatory nausea and vomiting (19.23%). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during C1 was the only statistically significant predictor of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (OR=16, 95%CI 2.4-670.9, p=0.0003). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anticipatory nausea is still high in the era of neurokinin-1 antagonists, and failure of antiemetic control in C1 remains the main risk factor. All efforts should be made to control chemotherapy-induced nausea or nausea and vomiting on C1 to avoid anticipatory nausea.

Daratumumab más bortezomib más dexametasona en personas mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico de mieloma múltiple refractario a lenalidomida y con recaída a al menos una línea de terapia previa / Daratumumab plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone in people aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma and relapsed to at least one prior line of therapy

INTRODUCCIÓN: Cuadro clínico: El mieloma múltiple (MM) produce diversas manifestaciones clínicas como lesiones y fracturas óseas, insuficiencia renal, hipercalcemia, infecciones recurrentes y/o anemia. Esta condición representa uno de los cánceres hematológicos más frecuentes, con una incidencia estandarizada por edad de 1.92 por cada cien mil personas a nivel mundial. En Perú, el MM es el tercer cáncer hematológico más frecuente y con mayor mortalidad. Asimismo, se estima responsable de la pérdida de 5365 años de vida saludable al año, principalmente por su componente de muerte prematura. Tecnología sanitária: El daratumumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que se une a la proteína CD38, expresada en alto nivel en las células tumorales del MM. Se encuentra indicado para uso combinado con bortezomib y dexametasona (D-Vd) en pacientes con MM tratados con al menos una línea de terapia previa. La dosis recomendada es 16 mg/kg de peso, administrados en ciclos semanales durante las primeras nueve semanas, cada tres semanas entre las semanas 10 y 24, y cada cuatro semanas a pa

Evaluation of the effects of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration on preemptive multimodal analgesia and anxiety in third molar surgeries: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration in preemptive analgesia and anxiety control in lower third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial conducted with patients divided into two groups: control group, receiving placebo and dexamethasone, and test group, receiving pregabalin and dexamethasone preoperatively. The evaluated variables were pain, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), anxiety assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaires, hemodynamic parameters [Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)], and sedation assessed by the Ramsay scale. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included. The test group exhibited a significant reduction in pain at 2,4,6,8,12,16,24, and 48 h after surgery and in the consumption of rescue analgesics. Anxiety, evaluated by STAI and VAS, showed a significant decrease in the test group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in BP at most of the assessed time points (p < 0.05) and a significant reduction in HR at two different time intervals (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), indicating a positive effect in the test group. There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the groups. Sedation assessment revealed a significant difference at all time points favoring the test group (p < 0.05). There were no significant postoperative adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin coadministered with dexamethasone demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling postoperative pain and anxiety, as well as a sedative effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The coadministration of pregabalin with dexamethasone may presents potential advantages in both pain modulation and psychological well-being of individuals undergoing third molar surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC), No. RBR-378h6t6.

Intranasal Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone to Treat Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV2 induces flu-like symptoms that can rapidly progress to severe acute lung injury and even death. The virus also invades the central nervous system (CNS), causing neuroinflammation and death from central failure. Intravenous (IV) or oral dexamethasone (DXM) reduced 28 d mortality in patients who required supplemental oxygen compared to those who received conventional care alone. Through these routes, DMX fails to reach therapeutic levels in the CNS. In contrast, the intranasal (IN) route produces therapeutic levels of DXM in the CNS, even at low doses, with similar systemic bioavailability. AIMS: To compare IN vs. IV DXM treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A controlled, multicenter, open-label trial. Patients with COVID-19 (69) were randomly assigned to receive IN-DXM (0.12 mg/kg for three days, followed by 0.6 mg/kg for up to seven days) or IV-DXM (6 mg/d for 10 d). The primary outcome was clinical improvement, as defined by the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ordinal scale. The secondary outcome was death at 28 d between IV and IN patients. Effects of both treatments on biochemical and immunoinflammatory profiles were also recorded. RESULTS: Initially, no significant differences in clinical severity, biometrics, and immunoinflammatory parameters were found between both groups. The NEWS-2 score was reduced, in 23 IN-DXM treated patients, with no significant variations in the 46 IV-DXM treated ones. Ten IV-DXM-treated patients and only one IN-DXM patient died. CONCLUSIONS: IN-DMX reduced NEWS-2 and mortality more efficiently than IV-DXM, suggesting that IN is a more efficient route of DXM administration.

Chikungunya Arthritis Treatment with Methotrexate and Dexamethasone: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya fever is a reemerging epidemic disease caused by a single-stranded RNA alphavirus transmitted throughout by Aedes mosquitoes. Chikungunya virus infection is a biphasic disease in which 72% to 95% of affected individuals manifest acute chikungunya fever. Following the acute phase, more than 40% of affected individuals develop arthritis, often lasting more than 3 months, referred to as chronic chikungunya arthritis, which frequently mimics rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment of chronic chikungunya arthritis with methotrexate and dexamethasone in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS: The patients were reassessed for treatment response by the DAS28-ESR, tender joint count and swollen joint count, Patient Global Assessment, and for secondary measures, including the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and Pain Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects were randomized (placebo, n = 16; methotrexate, n = 15); 27 completed treatment and 4 discontinued during the 8-week blinded period. Among the participants, 96.8% were female, with mean ± SD age was 52.9 ± 13. The mean ± SD disease duration prior to treatment was 220.9 ± 51.2 days. At 8 weeks, methotrexate-treated subjects showed a greater numerical trend towards improvement, but there were no significant differences between methotrexate- dexamethasone group and dexamethasone (placebo) group. CONCLUSION: In this relatively small cohort, all of whom received background dexamethasone, there was a greater numerical improvement trend in prespecified outcome measures, but methotrexate in combination with dexamethasone was not superior to dexamethasone in chronic chikungunya arthritis.

Three years of maintenance with VRD in multiple myeloma: results of total therapy IIIB with a 15-year follow-up.

ABSTRACT: The total therapy (TT) IIIB phase 2 study incorporated bortezomib into tandem melphalan-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for induction/consolidation and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) for maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). This updated analysis presents a 15.4-year median follow-up. Of 177 patients, 21% patients had gene expression profile (GEP)-defined high-risk MM. 15-year progression free survival (PFS) was 27.9%. Median PFS was better in GEP-defined low-risk patients at 7.8 years and in International Staging System stage 1 patients at 8.7 years. Overall, median OS was 9.1 years, and 15-year overall survival (OS) was 35.9%. GEP-defined low-risk patients' median OS was 11.2 years, and that of GEP-defined high-risk patients was 2.8 years. There was no difference in OS between TT IIIB and TT IIIA. This study includes the longest follow-up of patients treated with maintenance VRD reported to date. In patients with GEP-defined low-risk, nearly half and one-third of patients without ongoing treatment showed no signs of progression at 10 and 15 years, respectively. One-third of patients survived more than 15 years, but 3 years of VRD maintenance did not improve outcomes for patients with GEP-defined high-risk MM. The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00572169.

Favorable evolution of severe paraquat poisoning. Treatment with gastric lavage, activated charcoal, cyclophosphamide + corticoids, and conventional daily hemodialysis: case study at the Franck Joly Hospital Center in French Guiana / Évolution favorable d'une intoxication grave au paraquat. Traitement par lavage gastrique, charbon activé, cyclophosphamide + corticoïdes, et hémodialyse conventionnelle quotidienne : étude des cas au centre hospitalier Franck Joly en Guyane française

We report the observations of two patients, having voluntarily ingested lethal doses of paraquat with suicidal intent, with an unfavorable prognostic score. The treatment consisted of gastric lavage, administration of activated charcoal, n-acetylcysteine and cyclophosphamide + methylprednisolone + dexamethasone. The installation of acute renal failure motivated the initiation of daily conventional hemodialysis (HD) over 10 to 14 days, with a favorable evolution. The following complications were recorded: anemia, bacteremia and deep vein thrombosis. These observations raise three questions in the treatment of paraquat intoxication: the effectiveness of HD, the interest of its association with the above therapies in the prevention of pulmonary fibrosis, and the need for infectious prevention and thromboembolism. Furthermore, the absence of a paraquatemia assay cannot constitute a limitation for management, and hemoperfusion on an inaccessible charcoal column can be replaced by an HD usually available.

Nous rapportons les observations de deux patients ayant ingéré volontairement des doses létales du paraquat à but suicidaire, avec un score pronostic défavorable. Le traitement a consisté en un lavage gastrique, une administration du charbon activé, du n-acétylcystéine et du cyclophosphamide + méthylprednisolone + dexaméthasone. L'installation d'une insuffisance rénale aiguë a motivé l'initiation d'une hémodialyse conventionnelle quotidienne (HD) sur 10 à 14 jours, avec une évolution favorable. Les complications suivantes ont été enregistrées : anémie, bactériémie et thrombose veineuse profonde. Ces observations soulèvent trois questions dans le traitement d'une intoxication au paraquat : l'efficacité de l'HD, l'intérêt de son association avec les thérapeutiques supra dans la prévention de la fibrose pulmonaire, et la nécessité d'une prévention infectieuse et thrombo-embolique. Par ailleurs, l'absence d'un dosage de la paraquatémie ne peut constituer une limite pour la prise en charge, et l'hémoperfusion sur colonne de charbon non accessible peut être remplacée par une HD habituellement disponible.

Patients Age 40 Years and Younger With Multiple Myeloma Have the Same Prognosis as Older Patients: An Analysis of Real-World Patients' Evidence From Latin America.

PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a highly heterogeneous, incurable disease most frequently diagnosed in the elderly. Therefore, data on clinical characteristics and outcomes in the very young population are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed clinical characteristics, response to treatment, and survival in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM age 40 years or younger compared with 256 patients age 41-50 years and 957 patients age 51 years or older. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in sex, isotype, International Scoring System, renal involvement, hypercalcemia, anemia, dialysis, bony lesions, extramedullary disease, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The most used regimen in young patients was cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, followed by cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone. Of the patients age 40 years or younger, only 53% received autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) and 71.1% received maintenance. There were no differences in overall survival (OS) in the three patient cohorts. In the multivariate analysis, only high LDH, high cytogenetic risk, and ASCT were statistically associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, younger patients with MM in Latin America have similar clinical characteristics, responses, and OS compared with the elderly.

Hearing results with combination steroid therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss was described by Mc. Cabe in 1979 and, since then, many authors have tried to define, explain and correctly treat this disease. The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders defines it as sudden sensorineural hearing loss of at least 30 dB in three contiguous audiometric frequencies in a period of 72 hours. Among the therapeutic strategies, corticosteroids have been shown to have the greatest benefit due to their anti-inflammatory and anti-cellular stress effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the hearing results with combined steroid therapy in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), according to the Siegel recovery criteria scale. METHOD: Study carried out in the otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery service of the Centro Médico Naval, Ciudad de México, where 150 patients diagnosed with SSHL and who received combined therapy with intratympanic dexamethasone and systemic prednisone were included. RESULTS: Therapeutic effectiveness was demonstrated by correlating therapeutic success in 82% of cases and therapeutic failure in 18% of cases, by correlating it with the Siegel recovery criteria scale. When evaluating the general average of the pure tone average levels at the beginning and 6 weeks after treatment, a statistically significant difference was obtained (p = 0.001). The average of the speech audiometry at the beginning and 6 weeks later had a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial combined steroid treatment for SSHL has been shown to have beneficial results according to Siegel recovery criteria scale.

ANTECENDENTES: La Hipoacusia Neurosensorial Súbita Idiopática fue descrita por Mc. Cabe en 1979 y, desde entonces, muchos autores han tratado de definir, explicar y tratar correctamente esta enfermedad. El Nacional Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders la define como pérdida auditiva neurosensorial brusca de al menos 30 dB en tres frecuencias audiométricas contiguas en un periodo de 72 horas. Entre las estrategias terapéuticas, los corticosteroides han demostrado tener mayor beneficio por sus efectos antiinflamatorios y antiestrés celular. OBJETIVO: Determinar los resultados auditivos con la terapia de esteroides combinados en pacientes con hipoacusia neurosensorial súbita idiopática (HNSI), de acuerdo a la escala de criterios de recuperación de Siegel. MÉTODO: Estudio realizado en el servicio de otorrinolaringología y cirugía de cabeza y cuello del Centro Médico Naval, en Ciudad de México, en el que se incluyeron 150 pacientes con diagnóstico de HNSI y que recibieron terapia combinada con dexametasona intratimpánica y prednisona sistémica. RESULTADOS: Se demostró una efectividad terapéutica al correlacionar el éxito terapéutico en el 82% de los casos y un fracaso terapéutico en el 18% de los casos según la escala de criterios de recuperación de Siegel. Al evaluar el promedio general de los niveles de promedio de tonos puros al inicio y 6 semanas posterior al tratamiento se obtuvo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.001). El promedio de las logoaudiometrías al inicio y 6 semanas posterior al tratamiento tuvo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento combinado con esteroides de manera inicial para la HNSI ha demostrado tener resultados benéficos de acuerdo con la escala de criterios de recuperación de Siegel.

Nebulized and intraperitoneal ketamine have equivalent antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim and tail suspension tests in mice.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating illness that affects millions of people worldwide. Currently available antidepressants often take weeks to months to reach their full effect, which leads to an increased risk of suicidal behavior in patients with MMD. Intranasally, esketamine has emerged as an alternative to current antidepressants because of its rapid onset and long-lasting effects in patients with MDD. Animal models are useful for the initial pharmacological screening and for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effects of new drugs with potential against MDD. There is a lack of data on alternative routes of drug administration, either oral or injectable, that can be used in preclinical studies. This study aimed to test whether ketamine has antidepressant-like effects in mice when administered via nebulization using a low-cost apparatus. When mice whose depressive-like behavior was induced by corticosterone were treated with nebulized ketamine at concentrations of 1.3, 2.6, and 5.2 mg/mL, immobility was reduced by 38.6 %, 62.0 %, and 61.1 %, respectively, in the forced swimming test (FST) and 43.6 %, 42.1 %, and 57.9 %, respectively, in the tail suspension test (TST). When depression-like behavior was induced by dexamethasone, nebulization with ketamine reduced immobility by 79.7 %, 49.2 %, and 44.4 % in the FST and 80.9 %, 71.4 %, and 80.4 %, respectively, in the TST. When depression-like behavior was induced by the association between dexamethasone and unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) exposure, immobility was reduced by 26.1 %, 55.3 %, and 19.1 % in FST. Mice treated with nebulized ketamine did not show significant changes in the distance covered or in the time spent moving in the open field test. The efficacy of intraperitoneal and nebulized ketamine is equivalent, which shows that nebulization can be an alternative inexpensive route of drug administration for behavioral studies in rodents.

Transoperative intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anatomical results in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, at least grade B of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and with a trans-surgical dexamethasone implant vs the control group. We also assessed the diminution of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and the final visual acuity (VA). METHOD: The patients were evaluated clinically and with optical coherence tomography for 10 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of the dexamethasone implant on retinal detachment. Correlational analyses were explored depending on the variables' distribution, and an independent samples t-test was used to compare the VA in both groups. RESULTS: The study included 38 eyes of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: 18 with the implant and 20 for the control group. The evaluation of the main objective showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the anatomical success between the two groups (61.1% vs. 20%, treatment vs. control); odds ratio of 6.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.225. The t-test showed a significant difference in the final VA of the patients (t = 2.047; df = 36; p = 0.048; Cohen's d = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal redetachment was less frequent, and better VA was observed, in patients with the dexamethasone implant in comparison with the control group.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados anatómicos en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno, vitreorretinopatía proliferativa a partir de grado B y aplicación de implante de dexametasona transquirúrgico frente a un grupo control. También se valoraron la disminución de la vitreorretinopatía proliferativa y la agudeza visual (AV) final. MÉTODO: Los pacientes se evaluaron clínicamente y con tomografía de coherencia óptica por 10 meses. Se realizaron análisis de regresión logística para evaluar el efecto del implante en el redesprendimiento de retina. Se exploraron análisis correlacionales dependiendo de la distribución de variables y se aplicó la prueba t de muestras independientes para comparar la AV en ambos grupos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 38 ojos de pacientes con vitreorretinopatía proliferativa: 18 con el implante y 20 del grupo control. La evaluación del objetivo principal mostró diferencias significativas (p < 0.05) en el éxito anatómico entre ambos grupos (61.1% en los ojos con tratamiento frente a 20% en el grupo control); razón de momios de 6.29; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; R2 de Nagelkerke = 0.225. La prueba t mostró una diferencia significativa entre la AV final de los pacientes (t = 2.047; gl = 36; p = 0.048; d de Cohen = 0.66). CONCLUSIONES: Se observó menor redesprendimiento, así como mejor AV, en los pacientes con el implante de dexametasona en comparación con el grupo control.

The therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) exosomes in covid-19 disease; Focusing on dexamethasone therapy.

The study of diseases, specifically their aetiologies, their step-by-step progressions (pathogenesis), and their impact on normal structure and function, is the focus of pathology, a branch of science and medicine. In therapeutic fields, it is critical to decrease significantly elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines. The immunomodulatory drugs such as dexamethasone have been used in several of inflammatory diseases such as Covid-19. The use of dexamethasone alone or in combination with other drugs or method such as mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) is one of the most up-to-date discussions about Covid-19. In this review, we first examined the effects of dexamethasone as monotherapy on inflammatory cytokines and then examined studies that used combination therapy of dexamethasone and other drugs such as Baricitinib, Tofacitinib and tocilizumab. Also, therapeutic aspects of MSCs are examined in this review.

Overnight 1-mg Dexamethasone Suppression Test for Screening Cushing Syndrome and Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS): What Happens when Serum Dexamethasone Is Below Cutoff? How Frequent Is it?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of "invalid" 1-mg overnight dexamethasone (Dex) suppression tests (DSTs) (1-mg DST) on a large series of patients investigated for hypercortisolism and examine the interference of substances and clinical conditions that may explain low serum Dex levels. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1300 Dex-controlled 1-mg DST applied to patients screened for Cushing syndrome or mild autonomous cortisol secretion in a single center for which there were identified invalid tests and distinctive characteristics that may have interfered with the outcome. RESULTS: Among all tests, 146 (11.2%) were considered invalid (serum Dex levels <140 ng/dL, 36 [24.7%] of which were undetectable [<19.5 ng/dL]). In the Dex-undetectable group, 17% failed to take Dex correctly, 25% were on glucocorticoids (GCs), and 20% were on anticonvulsants and moderate CYP3A4 inducers. In the remaining 110 tests (serum Dex 20-140 ng/dL), 6.5% did not take Dex or were using GC, 22% were on anticonvulsants or CYP3A4 inducers, and another 13% had previous gastrointestinal tract abnormalities impairing drug absorption. CONCLUSION: Inappropriately low serum Dex levels during the 1-mg DST may lead to false-positive results. This is associated with recurrent use of CYP3A4-inducing drugs and/or gastrointestinal abnormalities. When serum Dex is undetectable, the key reason is failure to take the medication or the use of GC (when cortisol is suppressed). Simultaneous measurement of serum cortisol and Dex allows for DST validation, improving its accuracy and avoiding unnecessary repetitions. Adherence to verbal/written recommendations and actual use of medication are critical for interpreting the test.

Daratumumabe em combinação com bortezomibe e dexametasona para o tratamento de pacientes com mieloma múltiplo recidivado e/ou refratário que receberam uma única terapia prévia no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) / Daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have received a single prior therapy in the Unified Health System (SUS)

INTRODUÇÃO: O mieloma múltiplo (MM) é uma neoplasia maligna, caracterizada pela proliferação desregulada de plasmócitos (responsáveis pela produção de anticorpos), resultando principalmente em produção exacerbada de imunoglobulina não funcional. As manifestações clínicas mais comuns são dores ósseas e fraturas, anemia, insuficiência renal e infecções recorrentes. É a segunda neoplasia hematológica mais frequente (10-15% dos casos) e representa 1% de todos os tumores malignos, sendo considerada uma doença progressiva e sem cura, com a maioria dos pacientes apresentando múltiplas remissões e recidivas. O manejo terapêutico de MM recidivado e /ou refratário (MMRR) ainda é um desafio devido ao aumento da resistência às terapias, piora do prognóstico e declínio da qualidade de vida desses pacientes conforme progridem nas linhas de tratamento. HISTÓRICO DE RECOMENDAÇÕES DA CONITEC: Em fevereiro de 2022 foi publicado o Relatório de Recomendação nº 702 analisando o uso de daratumumabe para o controle do MMRR. A recomendação da Conitec e decisão do Ministério da Saúde foi pela não incorporação no SUS, considerando os indicadores de eficiência apresentados e a estimativa elevada de impacto orçamentário. Diferente da demanda de 2022, a solicitação atual, propõe o uso de daratumumabe em associação com bortezomibe e dexametasona apenas para pacientes com MMRR que receberam uma única terapia prévia. PE

Implante biodegradável de dexametasona para o tratamento do edema macular diabético em maiores de 18 anos, conforme Protocolo Clínico do Ministério da Saúde / Biodegradable dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in people over 18 years of age, according to the Clinical Protocol of the Ministry of Health

INTRODUÇÃO: A retinopatia diabética, a principal causa de cegueira em pessoas em idade laboral, é uma manifestação do diabetes na forma de lesão de órgãos-alvo. Clinicamente, as primeiras lesões são anormalidades vasculares como microaneurismas, hemorragias e exsudatos. O aumento da vasopermeabilidade resulta em espessamento da retina e/ou depósitos lipídicos. Quando esses eventos ocorrem na mácula, instala-se o edema macular diabético (EMD), levando ao risco de perda visual central. Dois mecanismos fundamentais estão envolvidos no EMD: angiogênese e inflamação. A angiogênese é secundária ao aumento da expressão de VEGF, principal molécula envolvida na perda da ruptura da barreira hemato-retiniana, que por sua vez causa a exsudação e espessamento macular. A inflamação pode ser causa ou consequência da angiogênese, atualmente considerada fator interdependente. Citocinas encontram-se elevadas em pacientes com retinopatia diabética e EMD, tendo correlação positiva com a severidade da doença ocular. O PCDT atual de retinopatia diabética, publicado pelo Ministério da Saúde, inclui os antiVEGFs ranibizumabe e aflibercepte para pacientes sem tratamento medicamentoso prévio, associado ou não à fotocoagulação a laser, para o EMD, mas não contempla a corticoterapia para o bloqueio da produção dos mediadores inflamatórios e barreira vascular endotelial. Por este motivo ainda existem necessidades não atendidas no cenário de tratamento das retinopatias diabéticas, especialmente relacionadas ao EMD. De acordo com a literatura, pacientes vitrectomizados, pacientes com eventos tromboembólicos recentes ou que não apresentaram resposta satisfatória ao tratamento com os antiangiogênicos, por exemplo, se encontram desassistidos pelo PCDT, além das dificuldades relacionadas ao regime de aplicações dos anti-VEGFs (injeções frequentes com deslocamentos aos serviços em saúde), complicando o atendimento no SUS. Ainda, relacionado às complicações da retinopatia diabética e qualidade de vida dos pacientes, a falta de tratamento ou tratamento subotimo pode levar à cegueira, além de outras complicações. BREVE HISTÓRICO: Em 2020 a tecnologia foi submetida e teve recomendação desfavorável devido as incertezas frente à ineficácia terapêutica, ausência de evidências robustas e falta de informação sobre delimitação e escopo para uso no SUS. PERGUNTA: O uso do implante intravítreo de dexametasona é seguro e efetivo no tratamento tratamento de adultos com edema macular diabético , como opção terapêutica no SUS? EVIDÊNCIAS CLÍNICAS: As evidências de eficácia e segurança do implante intravítreo de dexametasona são baseadas no estudo pivotal do implante intravítreo de dexametasona e em três estudos de comparação direta com os antiVEGFs, já incorporados ao SUS. O estudo pivotal que comparou o implante de dexametasona ao placebo, utilizando adicionalmente ou não a fotocoagulação a laser, demonstrou melhora da acuidade visual maior ou igual a 15 letras da linha de base do estudo, em ambos os braços de tratamento (DEXi 0,7 e 0,35 mg) em relação ao grupo placebo tratado apenas com fotocoagulação a laser. A melhora significativa no BCVA (do inglês, Best Corrected Visual Acuity) ocorreu independentemente do status do cristalino na linha de base do estudo. Os resultados do primeiro estudo de comparação direta são de não-inferioridade da dexametasona em relação ao ranibizumabe e redução do número de injeções realizadas, com perfil de segurança aceitável. O segundo estudo demonstrou equivalência da dexametasona ao tratamento com aflibercepte, uma vez que a diferença em BCVA não foi clinicamente significativa. O terceiro ECR de comparação direta incluído aponta para a segurança e eficácia em melhorar a BCVA e diminuir a espessura da mácula central, em pacientes com EMD, por ambos os implantes intravítreos (dexametasona vs ranibizumabe). A avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos ECRs foi realizada e os riscos de vieses foram descritos sendo de baixo risco, em sua maioria. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: O presente dossiê demonstrou que Ozurdex se configura como uma tecnologia poupadora de recursos para o sistema de saúde, através de apresentação de uma análise de custo-minimização abrangente, que incluiu custos de medicação, custos de administração e custos relativos a potenciais eventos adversos. Através de uma análise de cenários que variou os principais parâmetros tais como horizonte temporal (1 ou 3 anos), e custo de aquisição dos comparadores (anti-VEGFs), valor de APAC (forma de financiamento dos antiangiogênicos) ou custo do frasco-ampola proposto pelos fabricantes em suas solicitações de incorporação, foi possível demonstrar que o tratamento com Ozurdex pode proporcionar economia de recursos que varia de R$ 1.533,21 até R$ 15.651,77 por paciente, em comparação aos anti-VEGFs. ANÁLISE DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: Na análise de impacto orçamentário, foram avaliados sete cenários com combinações de diferentes valores para os comparadores (APAC e custo frasco-ampola), estimativas populacionais (epidemiológica ou demanda aferida) e dois possíveis comportamentos de market shares. A economia projetada foi de pelo menos R$ 8 milhões, avaliando o cenário mais conservador. Nos demais cenários as economias projetadas foram de R$ 16 e R$ 39 milhões, e entre R$ 148 e R$ 716 milhões em estimativa de usuários consideravelmente maior. Os montantes apresentados podem contribuir para a otimização dos recursos no manejo dos pacientes com RD. MONITORAMENTO DO HORIZONTE TECNOLÓGICO: Foram detectadas 3 tecnologias para compor o esquema terapêutico do edema macular diabético em adultos. São 3 anticorpos monoclonais inibidores do crescimento do endotélio vascular (VEGF): brolucizumabe, faricimabe e tarcocimabe tedromer, sendo que o segundo apresenta também ação anti-angiopoietina 2 (Ang-2). O brolucizumabe e faricimabe estão registrados na FDA e EMA desde 2022. O tarcocimabe está em fase 3 e pode apresentar resultados dos ensaios a partir de 2023. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS: Adicionalmente às evidências clínicas de qualidade, a avaliação de custo-minimização possui e a análise de impacto orçamentário possuem incertezas em relação à definição de custos e cenários de comparação, mas que sugerem dominância do Implante biodegradável de dexametasona para tratamento do edema macular diabético sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. PERSPECTIVA DO PACIENTE: Foi aberta a Chamada Pública nº 09/2022 de 13 a 26 de fevereiro 2022 e duas pessoas se inscreveram, ambas representantes de associações de pacientes. A definição dos representantes titular e suplente foi determinada por decisão consensual entre o grupo de inscritos. A representante leu três relatos de pacientes que possuem edema macular diabético e recorrem ao DEXi. Os três pacientes iniciaram o tratamento com um antiangiogênico e, após o uso do DEXi, apresentaram melhora dos sintomas e o alcance de maior qualidade de vida. Nenhum deles manifestou eventos adversos após o uso do implante. RECOMENDAÇÃO PRELIMINAR: Os membros do plenário, presentes na 118ª Reunião ordinária da Conitec, no dia 03 de maio de 2023, deliberaram por unanimidade encaminhar para a consulta pública com recomendação favorável a incorporação do implante biodegradável de dexametasona para o tratamento do edema macular diabético (EMD) em maiores de 18 anos no SUS. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Realizada no período de 03 de julho a 24 de julho do presente ano, teve 62 contribuições de caráter técnico-científico e 146 respostas tidas como de experiência ou opinião. As contribuições recebidas na consulta pública sobre o relatório que avalia a proposta de incorporação do Implante biodegradável de dexametasona para o tratamento do edema macular diabético (EMD) em maiores de 18 anos no SUS foram majoritariamente favoráveis a recomendação preliminar da Conitec, de incorporação. Não foram adicionadas na consulta pública, referências que alterassem a análise da evidência apresentada no relatório, apenas atualização pelo demandante. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros do plenário, presentes na 121ª Reunião ordinária da Conitec, no dia 02 de agosto de 2023, deliberaram por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação do implante biodegradável de dexametasona para o tratamento do edema macular diabético (EMD) em maiores de 18 anos conforme Protocolo Clínico do Ministério da Saúde, sob registro de deliberação 840/2023. Para tal recomendação, levou-se em consideração, entre outros fatores, que há economia de recursos em todos os cenários analisados e que os estudos demostraram que o benefício clínico do implante de dexametasona é maximizado para algumas populações, que atualmente encontram-se desassistidas ou subtratadas devido à ausência de uma opção de corticoterapia no âmbito do SUS. DECISÃO: Incorporar, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, o implante biodegradável de dexametasona para o tratamento do edema macular diabético em maiores de 18 anos, conforme Protocolo Clínico do Ministério da Saúde, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 193, seção 1, página 143, em 9 de outubro de 2023.

Anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of the application of baclofen cream, a GABAB receptor agonist, on skin inflammation in mice.

Previous studies have demonstrated the role of γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptors in skin-related conditions and pain. However, most studies have focused on the main effects of GABAB on the central nervous system. Therefore, this study has aimed to determine the potential topical anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects of baclofen cream in an inflammatory skin disease model. The effects of the baclofen cream were evaluated using acute and chronic models of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced skin inflammation in mouse ears. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed using an ear oedema assay. The effect of baclofen on keratinocyte proliferation was assessed in PAM212, the murine keratinocyte cell line. The results demonstrate that a single topical application of 5% baclofen, 7.5% baclofen, and 1% dexamethasone each inhibited acute TPA-induced ear oedema (58.94 ± 6.14%, 47.73 ± 11.26%, and 87.33 ± 4.59%, respectively). These results were confirmed by histological analysis. In the chronic model, baclofen (5%) and dexamethasone (1%) each inhibited ear oedema and the maximum inhibitory effect was reached at the end of the experiment (9th day of TPA application) with a percentage inhibition of 54.60 ± 6.15% for baclofen and 71.68 ± 3.45% for dexamethasone, when compared to the vehicle. These results were confirmed by histological analysis. Baclofen and dexamethasone also reduced proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression by 62.01 ± 6.65% and 70.42 ± 6.11%, respectively. However, baclofen did not inhibit keratinocyte proliferation in PAM212 cells. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that baclofen exhibits notable topical antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory properties and could be a potential therapeutic alternative for treating inflammatory and proliferative skin diseases.

Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy outcomes comparing pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus groups in a Brazilian cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) and dexamethasone pulse (DP) have been successfully used to treat pemphigus, but DCP/DP outcomes comparing pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare DCP/DP outcomes in a Brazilian cohort of PV and PF patients according to demographic and clinical data. METHODS: Retrospective analytical cohort study, reviewing medical charts of PV and PF patients (for DCP/DP Phases I‒IV consult Pasricha et al.16‒18). RESULTS: 37 PV and 41 PF patients non responsive to usual treatments were included similarly for DCP or DP therapy. Disease duration was longer among PF before DCP/DP prescription (p < 0.001); PF required a higher number of monthly pulses to acquire remission in Phase I (median 10 and 6 pulses, respectively; p = 0.005). DCP/DP outcomes were similar in both groups: remission in 37.8% of PV and 34.1% of PF after completed DCP/DP cycles following a median of 13 months (1-56 months follow-up); failure occurred in 13.5% of PV and 14.6% of PF in Phase I; relapse in 13.5% of PV and 12.2% of PF, and dropout in 27% of PV and 24.4% of PF in Phases II to IV. Mild side effects were documented. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The severity of PV and PF disease was not assessed by score indexes. CONCLUSIONS: PV and PF patients presented similar DCP/DP outcomes. DCP/DP should be initiated earlier in PF patients due to the longer duration of their disease in order to decrease the number of pulses and the duration of Phase I to acquire remission.

Possible therapeutics for Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a rare, lethal, and the least investigated disease

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) refers to a growth disorder characterized by glycoprotein neoplasm in the peritoneum, where mucin oversecretion occurs. The tumors of the appendix region are well associated with PMP; however, ovarian, colon, stomach, pancreas, and urachus tumors have also been linked to PMP. Other mucinous tumors in the pelvis, paracolic gutters, greater omentum, retrohepatic space, and Treitz ligament can be the reason for PMP. Despite being rare and having a slow growth rate, PMP can be lethal without treatment. It is treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the option of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In the current study, we hypothesize that there may be novel gentle ways to inhibit or eliminate the mucin. Dr. David Morris has used mucolytics - such as bromelain and N-acetyl cysteine to solubilize mucin. In the present review, we aimed to study the regulation of mucin expression by promoter methylation, and drugs that can inhibit mucin, such as boldine, amiloride, naltrexone, dexamethasone, and retinoid acid receptors antagonist. This review also explored some possible pathways, such as inhibition of Na + , Ca2+ channels and induction of DNA methyltransferase along with inhibition of ten-eleven translocation enzymes, which can be good targets to control mucin. Mucins are strong adhesive molecules that play great roles in clinging to cells or cell to cell. Besides, they have been greatly involved in metastasis and also act as disease markers for cancers. Diagnostic markers may have exclusive roles in disease initiation and progression. Therefore, the present review explores various drugs to control and target mucin in various diseases, specifically cancers. (AU)

Drug repositioning in the COVID-19 pandemic: fundamentals, synthetic routes, and overview of clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Drug repositioning is a strategy to identify a new therapeutic indication for molecules that have been approved for other conditions, aiming to speed up the traditional drug development process and reduce its costs. The high prevalence and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) underline the importance of searching for a safe and effective treatment for the disease, and drug repositioning is the most rational strategy to achieve this goal in a short period of time. Another advantage of repositioning is the fact that these compounds already have established synthetic routes, which facilitates their production at the industrial level. However, the hope for treatment cannot allow the indiscriminate use of medicines without a scientific basis. RESULTS: The main small molecules in clinical trials being studied to be potentially repositioned to treat COVID-19 are chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, favipiravir, colchicine, remdesivir, dexamethasone, nitazoxanide, azithromycin, camostat, methylprednisolone, and baricitinib. In the context of clinical tests, in general, they were carried out under the supervision of large consortiums with a methodology based on and recognized in the scientific community, factors that ensure the reliability of the data collected. From the synthetic perspective, compounds with less structural complexity have more simplified synthetic routes. Stereochemical complexity still represents the major challenge in the preparation of dexamethasone, ivermectin, and azithromycin, for instance. CONCLUSION: Remdesivir and baricitinib were approved for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Dexamethasone and methylprednisolone should be used with caution. Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, ivermectin, and azithromycin are ineffective for the treatment of the disease, and the other compounds presented uncertain results. Preclinical and clinical studies should not be analyzed alone, and their methodology's accuracy should also be considered. Regulatory agencies are responsible for analyzing the efficacy and safety of a treatment and must be respected as the competent authorities for this decision, avoiding the indiscriminate use of medicines.

Umbrales auditivos en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere manejados con corticoides transtimpánicos / Hearing thresholds in Ménière's disease patients managed with transtympanic dexametasone

Introducción: Pese a que el uso de corticoides transtimpánicos en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere es habitual en muchos centros, la evidencia respecto de su efecto sobre los umbrales auditivos es aún controversial. Objetivo: Estudiar los umbrales auditivos de pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere que recibieron corticoides transtimpánicos en el Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Material y Método: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere que consultaron entre los años 2015 y 2021. Se estudiaron los umbrales auditivos, antes y después de 3 inyecciones de dexametasona transtimpánica. Resultados: Se obtuvieron datos completos de 27 pacientes. Al comparar el promedio tonal puro antes y después del tratamiento, no se observaron diferencias significativas. A nivel individual, la variación de cambio de los umbrales auditivos con dexametasona se correlaciona en forma significativa con los umbrales auditivos previos a las inyecciones y con el tiempo transcurrido desde la última inyección, pero no con la edad. Conclusión: La terapia con dexametasona transtimpánica en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere no altera los umbrales auditivos. Sin embargo, se requieren más estudios, para comprobar, si existe un efecto transitorio en los umbrales auditivos de los primeros días posterior al procedimiento.

Introduction: Although transtympanic corticosteroids are proposed in Méniere's disease patients refractory to standard medical therapy, the evidence regarding the effect of transtympanic corticosteroids on hearing thresholds is still controversial. Aim: To study the hearing thresholds of patients with Méniere's disease who were administrated with transtympanic corticosteroids at the Otorhinolaryngology Service of the University of Chile's Clinical Hospital. Material and Method: Retrospective study of Méniere's disease patients who consulted between 2015 and 2021. Demographic variables and hearing thresholds were studied before and after three transtympanic injections of dexamethasone. Results: A total of 27 patients were studied. There were non-significant differences in pure-tone hearing threshold averages before and after the injections. Individual variation in hearing thresholds correlates significantly with the pre-injection hearing thresholds and the period since the last injection, but not with age. Conclusion: Transtympanic dexamethasone therapy in patients with Meniere's disease does not alter hearing thresholds. However, more studies are needed to verify whether there is a transitory effect on hearing thresholds in the first days after the procedure.