Impact of the MOVE (Mobility Optimizes Virtually Everything) Program.

ABSTRACT: Early mobility of hospitalized patients has been associated with improved postoperative results and psychological outcomes, decreased length of stay, and other benefits. This article discusses Mobility Optimizes Virtually Everything (MOVE), an interactive bingo-like activity for patients, and its impact on patient satisfaction, mobility documentation, and decompensation rates.

Postoperative Complications and Mobilization Following Major Abdominal Surgery With Versus Without Fitness Tracker-based Feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): A Student-led Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the CHIR-Net SIGMA Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily postoperative step goals and feedback through a fitness tracker (FT) reduce the rate of postoperative complications after surgery. BACKGROUND: Early and enhanced postoperative mobilization has been advocated to reduce postoperative complications, but it is unknown whether FT alone can reduce morbidity. METHODS: EXPELLIARMUS was performed at 11 University Hospitals across Germany by the student-led clinical trial network SIGMA. Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were enrolled, equipped with an FT, and randomly assigned to the experimental (visible screen) or control intervention (blackened screen). The experimental group received daily step goals and feedback through the FT. The primary end point was postoperative morbidity within 30 days using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). All trial visits were performed by medical students in the hospital with the opportunity to consult a surgeon-facilitator who also obtained informed consent. After discharge, medical students performed the 30-day postoperative visit through telephone and electronic questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The mean age of patients was 58 years, and 71% underwent surgery for malignant disease, with the most frequent indications being pancreatic, colorectal, and hepatobiliary malignancies. Roughly one-third of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. No imputation for the primary end point was necessary as data completeness was 100%. There was no significant difference in the CCI between the 2 groups in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean±SD CCI experimental group: 23±24 vs. control: 22±22; 95% CI: -6.1, 3.7; P=0.628). All secondary outcomes, including quality of recovery, 6-minute walking test, length of hospital stay, and step count until postoperative day 7 were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Daily step goals combined with FT-based feedback had no effect on postoperative morbidity. The EXPELLIARMUS shows that medical students can successfully conduct randomized controlled trials in surgery.

Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis is rising. Whereas the treatment for FFP type I, III, and IV is clear, the optimal treatment for FFP type II remains a topic of discussion. Traditionally these fractures have been treated conservatively. However, there is a shift toward early surgical stabilization with percutaneous screw fixation to reduce pain and promote mobility in an already frail patient population. High-quality evidence, however, is lacking. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial was designed to compare conservative management to early percutaneous screw fixation in patients with type II fragility fractures. METHODS: This is a monocenter randomized controlled trial. All patients with a FFP type II are screened for inclusion. After obtaining informed consent, patients are randomized between conservative management and surgical stabilization. Conservative management consists of early mobilization under guidance of physiotherapy and analgesics. Patients randomized for surgical treatment are operated on within 72 h using percutaneous screw fixation. The primary endpoint is mobility measured by the DEMMI score. Secondary endpoints are other dimensions of mobility, pain levels, quality of life, mortality, and morbidity. The total follow-up is 1 year. The required sample size is 68. DISCUSSION: The present study aims to give certainty on the potential benefit of surgical treatment. Current literature on this topic remains unclear. According to the volume of FFP at the study hospital, we assume that the number of patients needed for this study is gathered within 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04744350. Registered on February 8, 2021.

Early ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Early ambulation is an important step in accelerating post-joint replacement surgery recovery. However, there is limited research on populations who are unable to walk immediately after the operation. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors influencing postoperative ambulation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. METHODS: Primary TKA patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients were divided into two groups. Patients who began walking within 24 h were categorized as the early ambulation group, while patients who began walking after 24 h were classified as the late ambulation group. Recorded demographic data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), clinical diagnosis, and comorbidities. Hematological parameters potentially affecting patients' preoperative physical condition were also documented. Additionally, intraoperative metrics such as surgical time, surgical side, tourniquet time, intraoperative blood loss, the placement of drains, and prosthetic model were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 453 patients (79.0% female, 21.0% male) were included in this study. The average age of all patients was 68.5±7.9 years, ranging from 36 to 87 years, with an average BMI of 27.2±9.9 kg/ m 2 . The mean postoperative ambulation time was 1.6 days, with a range of 0-4 days. In univariate group comparisons, an increase in postoperative time to ambulation was significantly associated with a history of heart disease ( P < 0.001 ), stroke history ( P = 0.003 ), and prior surgeries ( P = 0.003 ). Patients who delayed ambulation also exhibited significantly higher coagulation-related parameters including PT ( P < 0.001 ), APTT ( P = 0.002 ), TT ( P = 0.039 ) before surgery compared to those who mobilized early. Furthermore, prolonged surgical time ( P = 0.030 ), increased intraoperative blood loss ( P < 0.001 ), and the placement of intraoperative drains ( P < 0.001 ) also significantly extended the time to postoperative ambulation. However, after multivariate logistic regression analysis, only PT (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32 - 2.61, P < 0.001 ), TT (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.55, P = 0.004 ) intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.01, P = 0.008 ) and the placement of intraoperative drains (OR 11.39, 95% CI 6.59 - 19.69, P < 0.001 ) were identified as predictive factors for late ambulation in patients after TKA. CONCLUSION: In this study, preoperative coagulation function, intraoperative blood loss and the placement of intraoperative drains were factors contributing to delay ambulation time. Therefore, it is believed that properly improving preoperative coagulation function, effective intraoperative hemostasis, and reducing the placement of drains have a positive impact on early postoperative ambulation in patients undergoing TKA.

First initiation of mobilization out of bed after cardiac surgery - an observational cross-sectional study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is associated with a period of postoperative bed rest. Although early mobilization is a vital component of postoperative care, for preventing complications and enhancing physical recovery, there is limited data on routine practices and optimal strategies for early mobilization after cardiac surgery. The aim of the study was to define the timing for the first initiation of out of bed mobilization after cardiac surgery and to describe the type of mobilization performed. METHODS: In this observational study, the first mobilization out of bed was studied in a subset of adult cardiac surgery patients (n = 290) from five of the eight university hospitals performing cardiothoracic surgery in Sweden. Over a five-week period, patients were evaluated for mobilization routines within the initial 24 h after cardiac surgery. Data on the timing of the first mobilization after the end of surgery, as well as the duration and type of mobilization, were documented. Additionally, information on patient characteristics, anesthesia, and surgery was collected. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients (96%) were mobilized out of bed within the first 24 h, and 39% of these patients were mobilized within 6 h after surgery. The time to first mobilization after the end of surgery was 8.7 ± 5.5 h; median of 7.1 [4.5-13.1] hours, with no significant differences between coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, aortic surgery or other procedures (p = 0.156). First mobilization session lasted 20 ± 41 min with median of 10 [1-11]. Various kinds of first-time mobilization, including sitting on the edge of the bed, standing, and sitting in a chair, were revealed. A moderate association was found between longer intubation time and later first mobilization (ρ = 0.487, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a moderate correlation between the first timing of mobilization duration of the first mobilization session (ρ = 0.315, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a median time to first mobilization out of bed of 7 h after cardiac surgery. A moderate correlation was observed between earlier timing of mobilization and shorter duration of the mobilization session. Future research should explore reasons for delayed mobilization and investigate whether earlier mobilization correlates with clinical benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FoU in VGR (Id 275,357) and Clinical Trials (NCT04729634).

Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel.

A scientific panel was created consisting of 23 interdisciplinary and interprofessional experts in intensive care medicine, physiotherapy, nursing care, surgery, rehabilitative medicine, and pneumology delegated from scientific societies together with a patient representative and a delegate from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies who advised methodological implementation. The guideline was created according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), based on The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. The topics of (early) mobilisation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, assist devices for mobilisation, and positioning, including prone positioning, were identified as areas to be addressed and assigned to specialist expert groups, taking conflicts of interest into account. The panel formulated PICO questions (addressing the population, intervention, comparison or control group as well as the resulting outcomes), conducted a systematic literature review with abstract screening and full-text analysis and created summary tables. This was followed by grading the evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence and a risk of bias assessment. The recommendations were finalized according to GRADE and voted using an online Delphi process followed by a final hybrid consensus conference. The German long version of the guideline was approved by the professional associations. For this English version an update of the systematic review was conducted until April 2024 and recommendation adapted based on new evidence in systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. In total, 46 recommendations were developed and research gaps addressed.

Effects of passive cycling on cerebrovascular reactivity in acute brain injured patients: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Early mobilization benefits critically ill patients, but concerns persist, especially in neurologic intensive care unit patients with acute brain injuries. This study assesses early mobility's impact on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) and systemic hemodynamics. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study focused on adult neurologic intensive care unit patients undergoing passive cycle ergometry. Data were collected from December 2020 to April 2022. Physical therapists conducted sessions using a standardized protocol, monitoring mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). The Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx) was calculated as a measure of CA. Statistical analysis included mixed models and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Eleven patients undergoing continuous physiologic monitoring and early mobility were included, primarily with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracranial hemorrhage. Median time to protocol initiation was 4 days, with two patients discontinuing due to hemodynamic disturbances. Over a total of 11-hours of neuromonitoring data, passive cycling demonstrated a significant reduction in heart rate (HR), MAP, and ICP across different rotations per minute (RPM) settings compared to baseline. No significant alterations in PRx or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were noted at various RPM levels. However, a significant difference in PRx emerged between patients who completed the protocol and those who did not, particularly at 10 RPM. DISCUSSION: This study offers preliminary insights into the impact of early mobility on CA in acute brain injured patients. While passive cycling demonstrates promise in preserving cerebral hemodynamics, its tolerability may not be uniform across all brain-injured patients. These findings highlight the need to determine optimal early mobilization timing and intensity in this population, emphasizing the necessity for larger prospective studies to validate these findings and inform clinical practice. DETAILS: This manuscript complies with all instructions to the authors. All coauthors meet the authorship requirements and have reviewed and approved the contents of the manuscript. The manuscript has not been published totally or partly, accepted for publication, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. STROBE checklist was reviewed prior to the submission of this paper. The manuscript adheres to ethical guidelines and was approved by Cleveland Clinic's institutional research board for retrospective study. There is no funding to disclose for this study.

Effects of patient-based self-assessed fatigue intervention on early postoperative ambulation following gynaecological oncology surgery: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a patient-based self-assessed fatigue intervention aimed at promoting early postoperative ambulation. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Single-centre, conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of the Xiangyang Central Hospital, China. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible were adult patients undergoing elective gynaecologic oncologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group utilised a modified Borg Rating of Perceived Experience (RPE) scale for self-assessment of fatigue levels. The control group followed fixed-activity distance guidelines postoperatively. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the self-reported the time to first flatus postoperatively. Secondary outcomes encompassed the time to first defecation, incidence of moderate-to-severe abdominal distention, ileus, postambulation adverse events (nausea, vomiting and dizziness), patient satisfaction with early ambulation instructions, compliance with early ambulation and average hospital costs and length of stay. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and October 2022, 552 patients were enrolled. The self-assessed fatigue intervention group demonstrated non-inferior the time to first flatus compared with the fixed-activity distance assessment group (25.59±14.59 hours vs 26.10±14.19 hours, pnon-inferiority<0.001). Compliance with activity was higher in the intervention group (49.40% vs 36.02%, p<0.001), although it did not reach 50%. The intervention group also exhibited significantly higher mean hospital costs, length of stay and incidence of moderate-to-severe abdominal distention (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The self-assessed fatigue intervention for early postoperative ambulation in gynaecologic oncology patients shows promise as an effective strategy; however, compliance is suboptimal. An intervention based on mandatory, yet reasonable, fixed-activity distance may represent the most viable current approach. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTR2100046035.

Allied health assistant management of people with hip fracture is feasible and may improve patient adherence to hip fracture mobilisation guidelines: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the feasibility of allied health assistant (AHA) management of people with hip fracture an acute hospital. DESIGN: Assessor-blind, parallel, feasibility randomised controlled trial with qualitative component. SETTING: Acute orthopaedic ward. PARTICIPANTS: People with surgically-managed hip fracture, who walked independently pre-fracture and had no cognitive impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Rehabilitation from an AHA, under the supervision of a physiotherapist, compared with rehabilitation from a physiotherapist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was evaluated according to focus areas of demand, acceptability, practicality and implementation. Secondary outcomes included estimates of effect of adherence to hip fracture mobilisation guidelines, discharge destination, 30-day readmission, functional activity, and length of stay. RESULTS: Fifty people were allocated to receive rehabilitation from an AHA (n = 25) or physiotherapist (n = 25). AHA rehabilitation had high demand with 60% of eligible participants recruited. Satisfaction with AHA rehabilitation was comparable with physiotherapy rehabilitation (acceptability). The AHA group received an average of 11 min (95% CI 4 to 19) more therapy per day than the physiotherapy group (implementation). The AHA group may have had lower cost of acute care (MD -$3 808 95% CI -7 651 to 35) and adverse events were comparable between groups (practicality). The AHA group may have been 22% (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.61) more likely to walk on any day and may have had a shorter length of stay (MD -0.8 days, 95% CI -2.3 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: AHA management of patients with hip fracture was feasible and may improve adherence to mobilisation guidelines and reduce cost of care and length of stay. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000877987. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Association between delayed ambulation and increased risk of adverse events after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: The relationship between delayed ambulation (DA) and postoperative adverse events (AEs) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in elderly patients remains elusive. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of DA on the postoperative AEs including complications, readmission and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively established database of elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) who underwent TLIF surgery. The early ambulation (EA) group was defined as patients ambulated within 48 h after surgery, whereas the delayed ambulation (DA) group was patients ambulated at a minimum of 48 h postoperatively. The DA patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched to the EA patients based on age, gender and the number of fused segments. Univariate analysis was used to compare postoperative outcomes between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for adverse events and DA. RESULTS: After excluding 125 patients for various reasons, 1025 patients (≤ 48 h: N = 659 and > 48 h: N = 366) were included in the final analysis. After propensity score matching, there were 326 matched patients in each group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data and the surgery-related variables between the two groups (p > 0.05). The patients in the DA group had a significant higher incidence of postoperative AEs (46.0% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.002) and longer LOS (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified that age, operative time, diabetes, and DA were independently associated with postoperative AEs, whereas greater age, higher international normalized ratio, and intraoperative estimated blood loss were identified as independent risk factors for DA. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed ambulation was an independent risk factor for postoperative AEs after TLIF in elderly patients. Older age, increased intraoperative blood loss and worse coagulation function were associated with delayed ambulation.

The Interval Between External Ventricular Drain (EVD) Implantation and Time to Mobilization in Patients at the Neurosurgery ICU.

AIM: To describe the time between external ventricular drain (EVD) implantation and mobilization in neurosurgery intensive care unit (ICU) patients with EVDs. Due to increased intracranial pressure, neurosurgery patients with external ventricular drain (EVD) who are admitted to the ICU frequently remain at rest, resulting in prolonged ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilator (MV) duration, and other adverse effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 131 neurosurgery patients admitted to the ICU with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who underwent EVD. Time of mobilization, level of mobilization, ICU and hospital LOS, MV duration, and other factors were evaluated for patients who met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of the 131 patients, 67 survived, and 61 began to mobilize in varying degrees of dangling (26.22%), standing (44.26%), and walking (29.5%). The mean number of days between EVD implantation and mobilization was 10.15. According to the findings, the mean ICU-LOS in patients was 14.56 days, the MV duration was 7.13 days, the time of ICU discharge from EVD removal was 7.08 days, and the hospital-LOS was 16.98 days. In addition, seven patients (10.44%) developed DVT, and three developed PE (4.47%). CONCLUSION: Prolonged immobility in patients with EVD is associated with negative outcomes such as PE and DVT, as well as an increase in MV duration, ICU-LOS, and hospital-LOS. Therefore, designing an appropriate and standard mobilization protocol and training nursing staff to assist patients in safely mobilizing can significantly reduce the complications above, reduce postoperative care, and empower patients.

Mobilidade à alta da UCI e sua relação com tempo de internamento e mortalidade hospitalar / Mobilidade à alta da UCI e sua relação com tempo de internamento e mortalidade hospitalar

O internamento em cuidados intensivos pode acompanhar-se de importantes efeitos adversos para utentes, que se prolongam além da estadia na unidade. A mobilização precoce faz parte de um conjunto de intervenções que procuram minimizar esses efeitos e é hoje unanimemente considerada como segura e benéfica. Importa então perceber em que medida está a ser implementada na prática e quais os seus reais benefícios. Objetivos: Caraterizar a mobilização dos doentes no Serviço de Medicina Intensiva da Unidade Local de Saúde de Castelo Branco; correlacionar o nível de mobilidade à alta da UCI com os desfechos pós-cuidados intensivos, nomeadamente: tempo de internamento pós-cuidados intensivos e mortalidade hospitalar. Métodos: Estudo do tipo observacional, retrospetivo, realizado no serviço de Medicina Intensiva da Unidade Local de Saúde de Castelo Branco, com base na metodologia quantitativa de investigação. Resultados: Dos 244 utentes analisados, 54,5% atingiram o ortostatismo no decorrer do internamento e 36,5% conseguiram a deambulação. O tempo de internamento entre a saída da UCI e a alta hospitalar foi em média de 8,0 ± 7,5 dias. Os utentes que, à alta, permaneciam em repouso no leito tiveram internamentos superiores a doentes em deambulação (p = 0,014); e doentes que realizavam atividades no leito tiveram também tempos de internamento superiores aos que faziam ortostatismo ou deambulação (p = 0,026 e 0,002 respetivamente). A mortalidade pós-UCI foi de 5,7%, verificando-se uma forte relação com a mobilidade na alta da UCI (p < 0,001), com os utentes com menor mobilidade a apresentarem mortalidade superior ao esperado. Conclusão: Os níveis de mobilidade encontrados neste trabalho estão em linha com a realidade internacional. Doentes que, durante a estadia nos cuidados intensivos, alcançam níveis mais elevados de mobilidade têm internamentos mais curtos e menor mortalidade.

Admission to intensive care can be accompanied by significant adverse effects for patients, which last beyond their stay in the unit. Early mobilization is part of a set of a bundle to minimize these effects and is now unanimously considered to be safe and beneficial. It is therefore important to understand how it is being implemented in practice and what its real benefits are. Aim: To characterize the mobilization of patients in the Intensive Care Unit of the Local Health Unit of Castelo Branco; to correlate the level of mobility at discharge from the ICU with post-intensive care outcomes, namely: length of stay after intensive care and hospital mortality. Methods:. This was an observational, retrospective study carried out in the Intensive Care Medicine department of the Castelo Branco Local Health Unit, based on quantitative research methodology. Results: Of the 244 patients analysed, 54.5% achieved orthostatism during hospitalization and 36.5% achieved deambulation. The average length of stay between leaving the ICU and hospital discharge was 8.0 ± 7.5 days. Patients who remained at bed rest at discharge had longer hospital stays than patients who were ambulating (p = 0.014); and patients who performed activities in bed also had longer hospital stays than those who were orthostatic or ambulating (p = 0.026 and 0.002 respectively). Post-ICU mortality was 5.7%, and there was a strong correlation with mobility on discharge from the ICU (p < 0.001), with less mobile patients having a higher mortality rate than expected. Conclusion:. The mobility levels founded in this study are in line with international reality. Patients who achieve higher levels of mobility during their stay in intensive care have shorter hospital stays and lower mortality.

Assessing the impact of early progressive mobilization on moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of neurodisability worldwide, with notably high disability rates among moderately severe TBI cases. Extensive previous research emphasizes the critical need for early initiation of rehabilitation interventions for these cases. However, the optimal timing and methodology of early mobilization in TBI remain to be conclusively determined. Therefore, we explored the impact of early progressive mobilization (EPM) protocols on the functional outcomes of ICU-admitted patients with moderate to severe TBI. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a trauma ICU of a medical center; 65 patients were randomly assigned to either the EPM group or the early progressive upright positioning (EPUP) group. The EPM group received early out-of-bed mobilization therapy within seven days after injury, while the EPUP group underwent early in-bed upright position rehabilitation. The primary outcome was the Perme ICU Mobility Score and secondary outcomes included Functional Independence Measure motor domain (FIM-motor) score, phase angle (PhA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and duration of ventilation. RESULTS: Among 65 randomized patients, 33 were assigned to EPM and 32 to EPUP group. The EPM group significantly outperformed the EPUP group in the Perme ICU Mobility and FIM-motor scores, with a notably shorter ICU stay by 5.9 days (p < 0.001) and ventilation duration by 6.7 days (p = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in PhAs. CONCLUSION: The early progressive out-of-bed mobilization protocol can enhance mobility and functional outcomes and shorten ICU stay and ventilation duration of patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Our study's results support further investigation of EPM through larger, randomized clinical trials. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04810273 . Registered 13 March 2021.

Safety and feasibility of early mobilization in patients submitted to cardiac surgery using subxiphoid drain.

INTRODUCTION: Patients submitted to heart surgery are restricted to the bed of the Intensive Care Units (ICUs), due to this period of immobility the individual is likely to present clinical and functional alterations. These complications can be avoided by early mobilization; however, in some hospitals, this is not feasible due to the use of subxiphoid drain in the immediate postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and feasibility of mobilizing patients after cardiac surgery using subxiphoid drain. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. On the first day the patient was positioned in sedestration in bed, then transferred from sitting to orthostasis, gait training and sedestration in an armchair. On the second postoperative day the same activities were performed, but with walking through the ICU with a progressive increase in distance. At all these moments, the patient was using the subxiphoid and intercostal drain. The patients were seen three times a day, but physical rehabilitation was performed twice. The adverse events considered were drain obstruction, accidental removal or displacement, total atrioventricular block, postoperative low output syndrome, cardiorespiratory arrest, pneumomediastinum, infection, and pericardial or myocardial damage. RESULTS: 176 patients were evaluated. Only 2 (0.4 %) of the patients had complications during or after mobilization, 1 (0.2 %) due to drain obstruction and 1 (0.2 %) due to accidental removal or displacement. CONCLUSION: Based on the data observed in the results, we found that the application of early mobilization in patients using subxiphoid drain after cardiac surgery is a safe and feasible conduct.