RESUMEN
This study compares graduate medical education (GME) payments between nonprofit and for-profit hospitals between 2011 and 2020 to assess how hospitals value GME.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Financiación Gubernamental , Administración Hospitalaria , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Hospitales , Internado y Residencia/economía , Estados Unidos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/economía , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/organización & administración , Gobierno FederalRESUMEN
The steady growth of corporate interest and influence in the health care sector over the past few decades has created a more business-oriented health care system in the United States, helping to spur for-profit and private equity investment. Proponents say that this trend makes the health care system more efficient, encourages innovation, and provides financial stability to ensure access and improve care. Critics counter that such moves favor profit over care and erode the patient-physician relationship. American College of Physicians (ACP) underscores that physicians are permitted to earn a reasonable income as long as they are fulfilling their fiduciary responsibility to provide high-quality, appropriate care within the guardrails of medical professionalism and ethics. In this position paper, ACP considers the effect of mergers, integration, private equity investment, nonprofit hospital requirements, and conversions from nonprofit to for-profit status on patients, physicians, and the health care system.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Administración Financiera , Política Organizacional , Sociedades Médicas , Atención a la Salud/ética , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Economía Hospitalaria/ética , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/normas , Administración Financiera/ética , Administración Financiera/normas , Instituciones Privadas de Salud/economía , Instituciones Privadas de Salud/ética , Instituciones Privadas de Salud/normas , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Médicos/economía , Médicos/ética , Médicos/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: To report revolutionary reorganization of academic gastroenterology division from COVID-19 pandemic surge at metropolitan Detroit epicenter from 0 infected patients on March 9, 2020, to > 300 infected patients in hospital census in April 2020 and > 200 infected patients in April 2021. SETTING: GI Division, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, has 36 GI clinical faculty; performs > 23,000 endoscopies annually; fully accredited GI fellowship since 1973; employs > 400 house staff annually since 1995; tertiary academic hospital; predominantly voluntary attendings; and primary teaching hospital, Oakland-University-Medical-School. METHODS: This was a prospective study. Expert opinion. Personal experience includes Hospital GI chief > 14 years until 2020; GI fellowship program director, several hospitals > 20 years; author of > 300 publications in peer-reviewed GI journals; committee-member, Food-and-Drug-Administration-GI-Advisory Committee > 5 years; and key hospital/medical school committee memberships. Computerized PubMed literature review was performed on hospital changes and pandemic. Study was exempted/approved by Hospital IRB, April 14, 2020. RESULTS: Division reorganized patient care to add clinical capacity and minimize risks to staff of contracting COVID-19 infection. Affiliated medical school changes included: changing "live" to virtual lectures; canceling medical student GI electives; exempting medical students from treating COVID-19-infected patients; and graduating medical students on time despite partly missing clinical electives. Division was reorganized by changing "live" GI lectures to virtual lectures; four GI fellows temporarily reassigned as medical attendings supervising COVID-19-infected patients; temporarily mandated intubation of COVID-19-infected patients for esophagogastroduodenoscopy; postponing elective GI endoscopies; and reducing average number of endoscopies from 100 to 4 per weekday during pandemic peak! GI clinic visits reduced by half (postponing non-urgent visits), and physical visits replaced by virtual visits. Economic pandemic impact included temporary, hospital deficit subsequently relieved by federal grants; hospital employee terminations/furloughs; and severe temporary decline in GI practitioner's income during surge. Hospital temporarily enhanced security and gradually ameliorated facemask shortage. GI program director contacted GI fellows twice weekly to ameliorate pandemic-induced stress. Divisional parties held virtually. GI fellowship applicants interviewed virtually. Graduate medical education changes included weekly committee meetings to monitor pandemic-induced changes; program managers working from home; canceling ACGME annual fellowship survey, changing ACGME physical to virtual site visits; and changing national conventions from physical to virtual. CONCLUSION: Reports profound and pervasive GI divisional changes to maximize clinical resources devoted to COVID-19-infected patients and minimize risks of transmitting infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Gastroenterología/educación , Administración Hospitalaria/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ciudades/economía , Ciudades/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Gastroenterología/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Michigan/epidemiología , Afiliación Organizacional/economía , Afiliación Organizacional/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The California Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP) provided incentive payments to Designated Public Hospitals (DPHs) to improve quality of care. We assessed the program's impact on reductions in sepsis mortality, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). DATA SOURCES: We used 2009-2014 discharge data from California hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We used a pre-post study design with a comparison group. We constructed propensity scores and used them to assign inverse probability weights according to their similarity to DPH discharges. Interaction term coefficients of time trends and treatment group provided significance testing. DATA EXTRACTION: We used Patient Safety Indicators for CLABSI, HAPU, and VTE, and constructed a sepsis mortality measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Discharges from DPHs and non-DPHs both saw decreases in the four outcomes over the DSRIP period (2010-2014). The difference-in-difference estimator (DD) for sepsis was only significant during two time periods, comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -2.90 percent, 95% CI: -5.08, -0.72 percent) and 2010 with 2014 (DD: -5.74, 95% CI: -8.76 percent, -2.72 percent); the DD estimator was not significant comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -1.30, 95% CI: -3.18 percent, 0.58 percent) or comparing 2010 with 2013 (DD: -3.05 percent, 95% CI: -6.50 percent, 0.40 percent). For CLABSI, we did not find any meaningful differences between DPHs and non-DPHs across the four time periods. For HAPU and VTE, the only significant DD estimator compared 2014 with 2010. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that DPHs participating in DSRIP outperformed non-DPHs during the DSRIP program. Our results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Given multiple concurrent inpatient safety initiatives, it was challenging to assign improvements over time periods to DSRIP.
Asunto(s)
Creación de Capacidad/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/organización & administración , Planes Estatales de Salud/organización & administración , California , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Analizar la calidad y el impacto de los análisis de coste-utilidad de productos sanitarios realizados por la Red de Agencias de Evaluación (RedETS). MÉTODO: Los análisis de coste-utilidad de productos sanitarios se identificaron buscando entre los informes de evaluación de la base de datos de la web de RedETS (2006-2016). La calidad se evaluó con un listado de verificación de calidad de RedETS, y su impacto, comparando resultados de coste-utilidad y la inclusión en la cartera común de servicios del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Se analizó la inclusión en la cartera común si la ratio de coste-efectividad incremental superaba o no los 25.000 por año de vida ajustado por calidad. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 25 análisis de coste-utilidad de productos sanitarios (12 de coste-utilidad, 10 de coste-efectividad y 3 de ambos). De ellos, 15 estudios con 19 ratios de coste-utilidad seleccionados cumplían al menos 18 de 25 criterios de verificación. Asimismo, 12 de los 15 estudios cumplían 18 de los 25 criterios. Sobre el impacto, en 6 de los 19 resultados se incluyó el producto en cartera aunque la ratio superó los 25.000 por año de vida ajustado por calidad. En tres casos se está en proceso de reevaluación; en otro, de replanteamiento una vez realizados los informes de eficacia-seguridad de nuevos dispositivos; y en dos casos se señala en la cartera que debe seguirse un protocolo. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de los análisis de coste-utilidad de productos sanitarios analizados cumplieron casi todos los ítems del listado de verificación y, por tanto, fueron exhaustivos. Estos análisis de coste-utilidad de productos sanitarios fueron coherentes con el marco de toma de decisiones para manejar eficientemente la cartera del Sistema Nacional de Salud
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the quality and impact of cost-utility evaluations of medical devices carried out by the Spanish Network of Assessment Agencies (RedETS). METHOD: The cost-utility evaluations of medical devices were identified by searching the evaluation reports of the RedETS website database (2006-2016). Quality and its impact were evaluated with a RedETS quality checklist, comparing cost-utility results and inclusion in the portfolio of common services of the National Health System. The portfolio inclusion status was analysed considering whether the cost-effectiveness incremental ratio was or was not less than 25,000/quality adjusted life years. RESULTS: 25 cost-utility evaluations of medical devices were found (12 cost-utility, 10 cost-effectiveness and 3 both). Fifteen selected cost-utility studies with 19 cost-utility ratios met at least 18 of 25 verification criteria. Also, 12 of the 15 studies met 19 of the 25 criteria. On the impact, in 6 out of the 19 results, the product was included in the portfolio even though the ratio exceeded 25,000/quality adjusted life years. There are three cases undergoing a re-evaluation process, another case being reconsidered once the efficacy-safety of new devices has been reported and in two cases the portfolio states that protocols are required. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cost-utility evaluations of medical devices published by RedETS fulfil most of the items on the checklist and, therefore, were thorough. These cost-utility evaluations of medical devices are consistent with the decision-making framework to efficiently manage the National Health System portfolio
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Acceso a Medicamentos Esenciales y Tecnologías Sanitarias , Equipos y Suministros/economía , Departamento de Compras en Hospital/economía , Análisis Costo-Eficiencia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Costos de Hospital/clasificación , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Evaluación en Salud/métodos , Bases de Datos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Lista de Verificación/clasificación , Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodosRESUMEN
Postoperative complications (PC) are a basic health outcome, but no surgery service in the world records and/or audits the PC associated with all the surgical procedures it performs. Most studies that have assessed the cost of PC suffer from poor quality and a lack of transparency and consistency. The payment system in place often rewards the volume of services provided rather than the quality of patients' clinical outcomes. Without a thorough registration of PC, the economic costs involved cannot be determined. An accurate, reliable appraisal would help identify areas for investment in order to reduce the incidence of PC, improve surgical results, and bring down the economic costs. This article describes how to quantify and classify PC using the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index, discusses the perspectives from which economic evaluations are performed and the minimum postoperative follow-up established, and makes various recommendations. The availability of accurate and impartially audited data on PC will help reduce their incidence and bring down costs. Patients, the health authorities, and society as a whole are sure to benefit.
Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/normas , Documentación/economía , Documentación/normas , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/normas , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Importance: Medicaid expansion was widely expected to alleviate the financial stresses faced by hospitals by providing additional revenue in the form of Medicaid reimbursements from patients previously receiving uncompensated care. Among nonprofit hospitals, which receive tax-exempt status in part because of their provision of uncompensated care, Medicaid expansion could have released hospital funds toward other community benefit activities. Objective: To examine changes in nonprofit hospital spending on community benefit activities after Medicaid expansion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used difference-in-differences analysis of 1666 US nonprofit hospitals that filed Internal Revenue Service Form 990 Schedule H detailing their community benefit expenditures between 2011 and 2017. The analysis was conducted from February to September 2019. Exposures: State Medicaid expansion between 2011 and 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of hospital operating expenditures attributable to charity care and subsidized care, bad debt (ie, unreimbursed spending for care of patients who did not apply for charity care), unreimbursed Medicaid spending, noncare direct community spending, and total community benefit spending. Results: Of 1478 hospitals in the sample in 2011, nearly half (653 [44.2%]) were small hospitals with fewer than 100 beds, and nearly 70% of hospitals (1023 [69.2%]) were in urban areas. Among the 1666 nonprofit hospitals, Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in spending on charity care and subsidized care (-0.68 [95% CI, -0.99 to -0.37] percentage points from a baseline mean [SD] of 3.6% [4.0%] of total hospital expenditures; P < .001) and in bad debt (-0.17 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.01] percentage points). There was an increase in unreimbursed spending attributable to caring for Medicaid patients (0.85 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.10] percentage points; P = .04), which canceled out uncompensated care savings from the expansion. Noncare direct community expenditures decreased overall (-0.24 [95% CI, -0.48 to 0.00] percentage points; P = .049). Direct community expenditures remained more stable in small hospitals (-0.07 [95% CI, -0.20 to 0.05] percentage points; P =.26) compared with large hospitals (-0.37 [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.12] percentage points; P = .14) and in nonurban hospitals (0.02 [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14] percentage points; P = .70) compared with urban hospitals (-0.36 [95% CI, -0.73 to 0.01] percentage points; P = .06). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in nonprofit hospitals' burden of providing uncompensated care, but this financial relief was not redirected toward spending on other community benefits.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Medicaid/organización & administración , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Gobierno Estatal , Atención no Remunerada/economía , Atención no Remunerada/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2014, Maryland launched a population-based payment model that replaced fee-for-service payments with global budgets for all hospital-based services. This global budget revenue program gives hospitals strong incentives to tightly control patient volume and meet budget targets. We examine the effects of the global budget revenue model on rates of admission to the hospital from emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We used medical record and billing data to examine adult ED encounters from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015, in 25 hospital-based EDs, including 10 Maryland global budget revenue hospitals, 10 matched non-Maryland hospitals (primary control), and 5 Maryland Total Patient Revenue hospitals (secondary control). Total Patient Revenue hospitals adopted global budgeting in 2010 under a pilot Maryland program targeting rural hospitals. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses for overall ED admission rates, ED admission rates for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions, and for clinical conditions that commonly lead to admission. RESULTS: In 3,175,210 ED encounters, the ED admission rate for Maryland global budget revenue hospitals decreased by 0.6% (95% confidence interval -0.8% to -0.4%) compared with that for non-Maryland controls after global budget revenue implementation, a 3.0% relative decline, and decreased by 1.9% (95% confidence interval -2.2% to -1.7%) compared with that for Total Patient Revenue hospitals, a 9.5% relative decline. Relative declines in ED admission rates were similar for ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition encounters. Admission rate declines varied across clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the global budget revenue model led to statistically significant although modest declines in ED admission rates within its first 2 years, with declines in ED admissions most pronounced among certain clinical conditions.
Asunto(s)
Presupuestos/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economíaRESUMEN
Most hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) provide payments for newly approved technologies. In Germany, they are negotiated between individual hospitals and health insurances. The aim of our study is to assess the functioning of temporary reimbursement mechanisms. We used multilevel logistic regression to examine factors at the hospital and state levels that are associated with agreeing innovation payments. Dependent variable was whether or not a hospital had successfully negotiated innovation payments in 2013 (n = 1532). Using agreement data of the yearly budget negotiations between each German hospital and representatives of the health insurances, the study comprises all German acute hospitals and innovation payments on all diagnoses. In total, 32.9% of the hospitals successfully negotiated innovation payments in 2013. We found that the chance of receiving innovation payments increased if the hospital was located in areas with a high degree of competition and if they were large, had university status and were private for-profit entities. Our study shows an implicit self-controlled selection of hospitals receiving innovation payments. While implicitly encouraging safety of patient care, policy makers should favour a more direct and transparent process of distributing innovation payments in prospective payment systems.
Asunto(s)
Tecnología Biomédica/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Invenciones/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Alemania , Modelos Estadísticos , NegociaciónRESUMEN
A shift in healthcare payment models from volume toward value-based incentives will require deliberate input into systems development from both perioperative clinicians and administrators to ensure appropriate recognition of the value of all services provided-particularly ones that are not reimbursable in current fee-for-service payment models. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology identifies cost drivers and reduces inaccurate costing based on siloed budgets. Inaccurate costing also results from the fact that current costing methods use charges and there has been tremendous cost shifting throughout health care. High cost, high variability processes can be identified for process improvement. As payment models inevitably evolve towards value-based metrics, it will be critical to knowledgably participate in the coordination of these changes. This document provides 8 practical Recommendations from the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) aimed at outlining the principles of TDABC, creating process maps for patient workflows, understanding payment structures, establishing physician alignment across service lines to create integrated practice units to facilitate development of evidence-based pathways for specific patient risk groups, establishing consistent care delivery, minimizing variability between physicians and departments, utilizing data analytics and information technology tools to track progress and obtain actionable data, and using TDABC to create costing transparency.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Flujo de Trabajo , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Sistemas de Información/organización & administración , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Perioperativa/economía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Integración de Sistemas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
This study assesses organizational and market factors related to high-tech service differentiation in local hospital markets. The sample includes 1704 nonfederal, general acute hospitals in urban counties in the United States. We relate organizational and market factors in 2011 to service differentiation in 2013, using ordinary least squares regression. Data are compiled from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals, Area Resource File, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Results show that hospitals differentiate more services relative to market rivals if they are larger than the rival and if the hospitals are further apart geographically. Hospitals differentiate more services if they are large, teaching, and nonprofit or public and if they face more market competition. Hospitals differentiate fewer services from rivals if they belong to multihospital systems. The findings underscore the pressures that urban hospitals face to offer high-tech services despite the potential of high-tech services to drive hospital costs upward.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Económica/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud , Sistemas Multiinstitucionales/economía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Eficiencia Organizacional , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Salud Global/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Pandemias/economía , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Innovación Organizacional/economía , Pandemias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
The gap between supply and demand for health care services is expanding rapidly in China. In order to resolve this problem, the government has implemented supply-side reforms in the health care sector by inviting private capital to increase supply quantity and improve quality. However, health care institutions have high complexity and particular needs, while non-profit hospitals have very strong public interests. This gives rise to complications in the implementation of public-private partnerships (PPPs) for health care services. In this paper, the authors have selected one case each from three different models of non-profit hospital PPP projects in the national PPP project database, operated by the Ministry of Finance, and compared how these projects were operated to identify the differences among them. A content analysis of the vital project documents is the primary analysis technique used for this comparison. Key issues investigated include reasons for model selection, requirements for private sectors and market competition level in different models, risk identification and sharing, design of payment mechanism, operation supervision, and performance appraisal of the project. Based on the comparison, some key lessons and recommendations are discussed to act as a useful reference for future non-profit hospital PPP projects in China.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Filantrópicos/organización & administración , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado , China , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Sector Privado/organización & administración , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
This analysis of the Polish health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. In late 2017, the Polish government committed to increase the share of public expenditures on health to 6% of GDP by 2024. If the GDP continues to grow in the years to come, this will present an opportunity to tackle mounting health challenges such as socioeconomic inequalities in health, high rates of obesity, rising burden of mental disorders and population ageing that put strain on health care resources. It is also an opportunity to tackle certain longstanding imbalances in the health sector, including overreliance on acute hospital care compared with other types of care, including ambulatory care and long-term care; shortages of human resources; the negligible role of health promotion and disease prevention vis-a-vis curative care; and poor financial situation in the hospital sector. Finally, the additional resources are much needed to implement important ongoing reforms, including the reform of primary care. The resources have to be spent wisely and waste should be minimized. The introduction, in 2016, of a special system (IOWISZ) of assessing investments in the health sector that require public financing (including from the EU funds) as well as the work undertaken by the Polish health technology assessment (HTA) agency (AOTMiT), which evaluates health technologies and publicly-financed health policy programmes as well as sets prices of goods and services, should help ensure that these goals are achieved. Recent reforms, such as the ongoing reform of primary care that seeks to improve coordination of care and the introduction of the hospital network, go in the right direction; however, a number of longstanding unresolved problems, such as hospital indebtedness, need to be tackled.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Atención a la Salud/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Polonia , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs)-based payment is an important tool for containment of inpatient expenditure rise in many countries. As a major developing country, China has introduced DRGs in the health reform. Beijing, the capital of China, developed a local DRGs version (BJ-DRGs) whose performance needs to be evaluated before universal utilization. The objective of this study was to survey the effect of BJ-DRGs-based payment on a pilot hospital. METHODS: We surveyed the profit and loss situation of 47 148 cases of hospital discharged patients in 107 groups of pilot BJ-DRGs-based payment from December 2011 to July 2018 in certain top tertiary hospital in Beijing. RESULTS: In pilot 107 groups of DRGs, there were 77 groups (71.96%) in profit and 30 groups (28.04%) in loss; average length of inpatient stay was 7.47 days, average inpatient expenditure ¥17 821.19, average DRGs standard unit price ¥15 896.83, average self-pay expenditure ¥1 117.04, and average profit ¥1 849.65; logistic regression showed that whether the pilot hospital of BJ-DRGs-based payment was in profit or loss was correlated negatively with inpatient expenditure, length of inpatient stay, drug expenditure, expenditure of medical consumables, and pilot years, and positively with DRGs standard unit price, self-pay expenditure, and age and gender (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: BJ-DRGs-based payment is the first implemented DRGs-based prospective payment system in China. The current DRGs pilot model made the pilot hospital appear profitable as a whole and its length of inpatient stay decline.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , China , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Factores Sexuales , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This case asks how a hospital should balance patients' health needs with its financial bottom line regarding emergency department utilization. Should hospitals engage in proactive population health initiatives if they result in decreased revenue from their emergency departments? Which values should guide their thinking about this question? Drawing upon emerging legal and moral consensus about hospitals' obligations to their surrounding communities, this commentary argues that treating emergency departments purely as revenue streams violates both legal and moral standards.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Economía Hospitalaria/ética , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Generales/economía , Hospitales Generales/ética , Hospitales Generales/organización & administración , Humanos , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales/ética , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales/organización & administración , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores Sociales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In U.S. hospitals, boards of directors (BODs) have numerous governance responsibilities including overseeing hospital activities and guiding strategic decisions. BODs can help hospitals adapt to changes in their markets including those stemming from a shift from fee-for-service to value-based purchasing. The recent increase in market turbulence for hospitals has brought renewed attention to the work of BODs. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to examine trends in hospital BOD structure and activities and determine whether these changes are commensurate with approaches designed to respond to market pressures. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We examined hospital level data from The Governance Institute Survey (2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015) and corresponding years of the American Hospital Association Annual Survey in a pooled, cross-sectional design. We conducted individual multivariate models with adjustments for hospital and market characteristics, comparing the changes in BOD structures, demographics, and activities over time. FINDINGS: The sample included 1,811 hospital-year observations, including 682 unique facilities. We found that BODs in 2015 had less internal management (ß = -2.25, p < .001) and fewer employed and nonemployed physicians (ß = -8.28, p < .001) involved on the BOD. Moreover, compared to 2009, racial and ethnic minorities (2013 ß = 2.88, p < .001) and women (2013 ß = 1.60, p = .045; 2015 ß = 2.06, p = .049) on BODs increased over time. In addition, BODs were significantly less likely to spend time on the following activities in 2015, as compared to 2009: discussing strategy and setting policy (ß = -5.46, p = .002); receiving reports from management, board committees, and subsidiaries (ß = -29.04, p < .001); and educating board members (ß = -4.21, p < .001). Finally, BODs had no changes in the type of committees reported over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our results indicate that hospital BODs deploy various strategies to adapt to current market trends. Hospital decision-makers should be aware of the potential effects of board structure on organization's position in the changing health care market.
Asunto(s)
Consejo Directivo/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria/métodos , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The main aim of the article is to analyze the occurrence of agglomeration effect in the hospital sector on the basis of financial performance. The considerations are made on the example of hospitals in Poland-the country that survived the latest economic crisis relatively well, usually generating positive values of GDP, but where still there is an ongoing discussion on the final shape of healthcare financing model. The article is based on the assumption that there occur significant differences in financial performance between hospitals according to their location. The research hypothesis is as follows: Hospitals operating in big cities are featured by better financial condition than their counterparts operating in smaller towns. To verify the hypothesis, the methods of financial analysis and statistical hypothesis testing are used. As it is emphasized in the article, the assumption is true and the hypothesis can be verified positively.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Hospitales Rurales/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/economía , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Geografía/economía , Geografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , PoloniaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) is an initiative that rewards acute-care hospitals with incentive payments for the quality of care they provide. A hospital's trauma certification has the potential to influence HVBP scores as attaining the certification provides indication of the service quality offered by the hospital. As such, this study focuses on hospitals' level of trauma certification attainment through the American College of Surgeons and whether this certification is associated with greater HVBP. METHODS: A retrospective review of the 2015 HVBP database, 2015 Area Health Resources Files (AHRF) database, and the 2015 American Hospital Association (AHA) database is utilized, and propensity score matching was employed to determine the association between level of trauma certification and scores on HVBP dimensions. RESULTS: Results reveal trauma certification is associated with lower HVBP domain scores when compared to hospitals without trauma certification. In addition, hospitals with a greater degree of trauma specialization were associated with lower total performance score and efficiency domain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although payers attempt to connect hospital reimbursements with quality and outcomes, unintended consequences may occur. In response to these results, HVBP risk adjustment and scoring methods should receive further scrutiny.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Compra Basada en Calidad/organización & administración , Compra Basada en Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With payers and policymakers' focus on improving the value (health outcomes achieved per health care dollar spent) of health care delivery, physicians are increasingly taking on senior leadership/management positions in health care organizations (Carsen & Xia, 2006). Little research has been done to understand the impact of physician leadership on the delivery of care. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether hospital systems led by physicians were associated with better U.S. News and World Report (USNWR) quality ratings, financial performance, and operating efficiency as compared with those led by nonphysician managers. METHODOLOGY: Cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data from Medicare Cost Reports and the USNWR on the 115 largest U.S. hospitals was performed. Bivariate analysis of physician-led and non-physician-led hospital networks included three categories: USNWR quality ratings, hospital volume, and financial performance. Multivariate analysis of hospital leadership, percent operating margin, inpatient days per hospital bed, and average quality rating was subsequently performed. RESULTS: Hospitals in physician-led hospital systems had higher quality ratings across all specialties and more inpatient days per hospital bed than did non-physician-led hospitals; however, there were no differences in the total revenue or profit margins between the groups. Physician leadership was independently associated with higher average quality ratings and inpatient days per bed. CONCLUSIONS: Large hospital systems led by physicians in 2015 received higher USNWR ratings and bed usage rates than did hospitals led by nonphysicians, with no differences in financial performance. This study suggests that physician leaders may possess skills, qualities, or management approaches that positively affect hospital quality and the value of care delivered. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital quality and efficiency ratings vary significantly and can impact consumer decisions. Hospital systems may benefit from the presence of physician leadership to improve the quality and efficiency of care delivered to patients. In addition, medical education should help prepare physicians to take on leadership roles in hospitals and health systems.