Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.469
Filtrar
1.
J Wound Care ; 33(Sup6): S20-S24, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843045

RESUMEN

Cutaneous malignant melanoma (cMM) can develop at any site, but one-third of cases primarily affect the lower extremities, with ankle and foot lesions representing 3-15% of all cases. However, cMM may become a clinical conundrum when it presents as chronic ulceration that is clinically indiscernible from other lower extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes. We present the case of a 71-year-old female patient with a longstanding history of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease and heart failure who presented to our hospital with a fungating heel ulcer. The lesion was initially managed in another hospital as a neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), treated by multiple local wound debridement. However, the ulcer progressed into a fungating heel lesion that interfered with the patient's mobility and quality of life. Consequently, the patient was referred to our specialist diabetic foot service for further management. Excisional biopsy of the lesion disclosed a cMM. Positron emission tomography/computed-tomography scanning revealed hypermetabolic ipsilateral inguinal lymphadenopathy, and a right cerebral metastasis for which palliative chemotherapy was initiated. Immunotherapy was considered, but the patient died before it was started. Atypical foot ulcers in patients with diabetes warrant a careful diagnostic approach, especially for recalcitrant cutaneous lesions not responding to standard therapies. Conscientious management, without undue delay in obtaining a histopathological diagnosis, might lead to early diagnosis of melanoma and potentially more favourable outcomes. This case highlights the importance of consideration of atypical foot lesions, in general practice in addition to referral centres, to try to identify alarming features and act accordingly.


Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético , Talón , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patología , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Resultado Fatal , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno , Úlcera del Pie/diagnóstico , Úlcera del Pie/terapia , Úlcera del Pie/patología
2.
J Wound Care ; 33(Sup4a): lxxxv-xc, 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588057

RESUMEN

Biosurgery (larval therapy) has been used for centuries. However, in recent times, this treatment has been replaced with the use of antibiotics for the treatment of wounds. Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, larval therapy is once again coming to the fore as an effective and efficient treatment. Due to the increasing ageing population, along with an increase in patients with arterial occlusive disease, diabetes and immobility, the number of patients with hard-to-heal wounds will increase. The stressors associated with wounds, such as pain, limited physical functionality, depression and social withdrawal, have a negative impact on patient quality of life. This case report documents the performance of biosurgery in a patient with multimorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Desbridamiento , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Cicatrización de Heridas , Úlcera del Pie/cirugía , Bacterias
3.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 46, 2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622562

RESUMEN

AIM/INTRODUCTION: This study was designed as the second phase of a prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a university hospital in Iran. Each participant was checked and followed up for two years in terms of developing newfound DFU as ultimate outcome. We investigated the variables using univariate analysis and then by backward elimination multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We followed up 901 eligible patients with diabetes for two years. The mean age of the participants was 53.24 ± 11.46 years, and 58.53% of them were female. The two-year cumulative incidence of diabetic foot ulcer was 8% (95% CI 0.071, 0.089) [Incidence rate: 49.9 /1000 person-years]. However, the second-year incidence which was coincident with the COVID-19 pandemic was higher than the first-year incidence (4.18% and 1.8%, respectively). Based on our analysis, the following variables were the main risk factors for DFU incidence: former history of DFU or amputation [OR = 76.5, 95% CI(33.45,174.97), P value < 0.001], ill-fitting foot-wear [OR = 10.38, 95% CI(4.47,24.12), P value < 0.001], smoking [OR = 3.87,95%CI(1.28, 11.71),P value = 0.016], lack of preventive foot care [OR = 2.91%CI(1.02,8.29),P value = 0.045], and insufficient physical activity[OR = 2.25,95% CI(0.95,5.35),P value = 0.066]. CONCLUSION: Overall, the two-year cumulative incidence of diabetic foot ulcer was 8% [Incidence rate: 49.9 /1000 person-years]; however, the second-year incidence was higher than the first-year incidence which was coincident with the COVID-19 pandemic (4.18% and 1.8%, respectively). Independent risk factors of DFU occurrence were prior history of DFU or amputation, ill-fitting footwear, smoking, lack of preventive foot care, and insufficient physical activity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Pie Diabético/etiología , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Pandemias , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/epidemiología , Úlcera del Pie/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología
4.
J Wound Care ; 33(4): 253-261, 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573904

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to identify the impact of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals within the Arab world. METHOD: A PRISMA-guided systematic search for HRQoL studies in Arab populations was conducted in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO. Relevant studies were critically appraised using the STROBE statement checklist. RESULTS: A total of five studies were included. Three studies originated from Saudi Arabia, one from Jordan and one from Tunisia. The studies consistently demonstrated lower (poorer) HRQoL in patients with DFU, and worse HRQoL compared with both patients with diabetes and no DFU, and with healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: This review confirmed the negative impact of DFU on HRQoL in individuals with diabetes. It also highlights the scarcity of HRQoL studies from the Arab world. However, given that all studies included were conducted between 2013-2019, this could reflect a growing interest in DFU and HRQoL in the Arab world, and could potentially indicate that more studies will follow. In light of this, there is a need for a renewed focus on the completion of a high-quality standardised approach to research in this region.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Mundo Árabe , Jordania
5.
J Wound Care ; 33(Sup4): S25-S32, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573950

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of podiatrists in preventing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in China. METHOD: The study was a prospective investigation. A total of 300 patients were enrolled from May 2016 to May 2018 in Handan Central Hospital, China. All patients who participated in this study had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). All participants underwent our survey, which included basic patient data and information about DFUs. The patients were followed for one year, during which time they received appropriate intervention from podiatrists, including lifestyle guidance, callus resection, tinea grinding and ingrown nail correction. At the end of the year all the patients were surveyed again. The data before and after the year were statistically compared. RESULTS: The results showed that the incidence of DFUs in patients with diabetes was significantly decreased after one year of intervention from podiatrists (20.7% versus 6.7%, p<0.001). Additionally, there was a negative correlation between the number of intervention visits and the number of DFU occurrences (Spearman correlation coefficient: -0.496, p<0.001). Furthermore, we found that 68 patients with a history of DFUs or amputation had an obviously reduced incidence of DFUs after intervention by a podiatrist (89.7% versus 27.9%, p<0.001). We also investigated other foot risk factors in all participants, such as limb neuropathy (76.3%), lower extremity vascular disease (65.7%) and foot paralysis (43.7%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study help in understanding the situation of patients with diabetes in China and to prove that standardised podiatrist intervention has an important role in inhibiting the occurrence and development of DFUs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/prevención & control , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Hospitales
6.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14552, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513698

RESUMEN

Diabetic foot ulcer is a debilitating complication of long-standing diabetes mellitus. Patients lose their earning potential, face repeated hospitalizations, and are forced to bear heavy treatment costs. This places an enormous financial burden on the patients and their families. This study seeks to ascertain the out-of-pocket expenditure among these patients and correlate it with their risk factor profile. In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, a total of 154 patients with diabetic foot ulcers or amputations have been studied with an elaborate patient questionnaire and relevant clinical examinations. The costs incurred and the risk factors of the patients were analyzed for statistical association. The median total annual out-of-pocket expenditure for the management of diabetic foot ulcers among the study participants was found to be ₹29 775 (₹9650-₹81 120) ($378.14 [$122.56-$1030.22]). Out of the total expenditure, 58.49% went towards direct medical costs, 5.64% towards direct non-medical costs, and 35.88% for indirect costs. Medications, ulcer dressing and periodic debridement have accounted for 79.26% of direct medical costs. Transportation (61.37%) and patient's loss of income (89.45%) account for the major costs under the direct non-medical and indirect cost categories, respectively. A high ulcer grade and area, long ulcer duration, and past history of ulcers have higher expenditure. Patients seeking treatment from private establishments and those engaged in professional/skilled occupations have higher expenses. Adequate dressing of foot ulcers and proper footwear are associated with lower treatment expenditure. 68.8% of the participants have faced catastrophic expenditure due to treatment costs of diabetic foot ulcers. Adequate glycaemic control and proper foot care are necessary. Patients must seek medical care at the earliest in case of foot ulceration. Clinicians must provide proper wound care, institute effective antibiotics, and manage the complications. Government and insurance schemes are required to alleviate the patients' financial burden.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Gastos en Salud , Estudios Transversales , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Costos de la Atención en Salud
7.
Wounds ; 36(2): 43-46, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: AS is a malignant tumor that originates from vascular endothelial cells and is known for a high rate of local recurrence and metastasis. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old male presented with cutaneous epithelioid AS. Cutaneous AS of the foot is quite rare, especially in the absence of predisposing factors, and in this patient it was previously misdiagnosed as a DFU. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of this rare presentation of cutaneous AS. The authors of the current report advise regular clinical reassessment of chronic ulcers and biopsies of nonhealing wounds, even when adequate wound treatment has been administered, with the goal of identifying ulcerated skin malignancies and preventing delay in providing appropriate treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Hemangiosarcoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pie Diabético/patología , Hemangiosarcoma/diagnóstico , Células Endoteliales/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Errores Diagnósticos , Úlcera del Pie/diagnóstico
8.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 40(3): e3786, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is critical that interventions used to enhance the healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes are backed by high-quality evidence and cost-effectiveness. In previous years, the systematic review accompanying guidelines published by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot performed 4-yearly updates of previous searches, including trials of prospective, cross-sectional and case-control design. AIMS: Due to a need to re-evaluate older studies against newer standards of reporting and assessment of risk of bias, we performed a whole new search from conception, but limiting studies to randomised control trials only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for published studies on randomised control trials of interventions to enhance healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers. We only included trials comparing interventions to standard of care. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion and assessed relevant outcomes as well as methodological quality. RESULTS: The literature search identified 22,250 articles, of which 262 were selected for full text review across 10 categories of interventions. Overall, the certainty of evidence for a majority of wound healing interventions was low or very low, with moderate evidence existing for two interventions (sucrose-octasulfate and leucocyte, platelet and fibrin patch) and low quality evidence for a further four (hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, placental derived products and negative pressure wound therapy). The majority of interventions had insufficient evidence. CONCLUSION: Overall, the evidence to support any other intervention to enhance wound healing is lacking and further high-quality randomised control trials are encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Placenta , Cicatrización de Heridas
9.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(4): 180-196, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38354304

RESUMEN

GENERAL PURPOSE: To review a practical and scientifically sound application of the wound bed preparation model for communities without ideal resources. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Summarize issues related to wound assessment.2. Identify a class of drugs for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus that has been shown to improve glycemia, nephroprotection, and cardiovascular outcomes.3. Synthesize strategies for wound management, including treatment in resource-limited settings.4. Specify the target time for edge advancement in chronic, healable wounds.


Chronic wound management in low-resource settings deserves special attention. Rural or underresourced settings (ie, those with limited basic needs/healthcare supplies and inconsistent availability of interprofessional team members) may not have the capacity to apply or duplicate best practices from urban or abundantly-resourced settings. The authors linked world expertise to develop a practical and scientifically sound application of the wound bed preparation model for communities without ideal resources. A group of 41 wound experts from 15 countries reached a consensus on wound bed preparation in resource-limited settings. Each statement of 10 key concepts (32 substatements) reached more than 88% consensus. The consensus statements and rationales can guide clinical practice and research for practitioners in low-resource settings. These concepts should prompt ongoing innovation to improve patient outcomes and healthcare system efficiency for all persons with foot ulcers, especially persons with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/terapia , Configuración de Recursos Limitados
10.
Fisioterapia (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 46(1): 34-41, ene.-feb. 2024. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-229874

RESUMEN

Objetivo Investigar el nivel de eficacia de plantillas personalizadas y zapatos terapéuticos en la reducción de la presión plantar y la incidencia de ulceración en presencia de neuropatía diabética. Metodología Las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahls, Central Cochrane y Lilacs fueron encuestados en enero de 2020. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) que reportaron pacientes con neuropatía diabética sometidos a intervención con plantillas y calzado terapéutico en comparación con un grupo control. La calidad de las publicaciones se evaluó mediante la escala PEDro y la evidencia mediante la clasificación GRADE. En cuanto al metaanálisis, se realizó la agrupación de datos homogéneos y comparables. Resultados Se incluyeron 11 estudios, lo que resultó en una muestra de 1.443 participantes. Siete artículos presentaron datos suficientes para el metaanálisis. En el corto plazo, el riesgo relativo de protección fue de 0,23 (IC 95%; 0,07; 0,72), mientras que en el largo plazo el riesgo fue de 0,32 (IC 95%; 0,21; 0,48). La escala GRADE señaló baja calidad de evidencia en cuanto a la protección a corto plazo y alta calidad a largo plazo En el análisis cualitativo, seis estudios concluyeron que hubo reducción en la presión plantar del grupo de intervención. Conclusión Se encontró efecto protector del uso de plantillas en el desarrollo de úlceras a corto y largo plazo. (AU)


Objective To investigate the level of efficacy of personalized insoles and therapeutical shoes in plantar pressure and ulceration incidence reduction in the presence of diabetic neuropathy. Methodology The data bases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahls, Central Cochrane and Lilacs were surveyed in January/2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included that reported diabetic neuropathy patients submitted to intervention with insoles and therapeutical shoes compared to a control group. The quality of the publications was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the evidence by the GRADE classification. Regarding the meta-analysis, the grouping of homogeneous and comparable data was carried out. Results Eleven studies were included, which resulted in a sample containing 1,443 participants. Seven papers presented enough data for the meta-analysis. In the short term, the protection relative risk was 0.23 (IC95% 0.07;0.72), while in the long term, the risk was 0.32 (IC95% 0.21;0.48). The GRADE scale pointed out low evidence quality regarding short-term protection and high quality in the long term. In the qualitative analysis, six studies concluded that there was reduction in the plantar pressure of the intervention group. Conclusion Protective effect of using insoles was found in the development of ulcers in the short and long term. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Úlcera del Pie , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Aparatos Ortopédicos
11.
Fisioterapia (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 46(1): 34-41, ene.-feb. 2024. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-EMG-492

RESUMEN

Objetivo Investigar el nivel de eficacia de plantillas personalizadas y zapatos terapéuticos en la reducción de la presión plantar y la incidencia de ulceración en presencia de neuropatía diabética. Metodología Las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahls, Central Cochrane y Lilacs fueron encuestados en enero de 2020. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) que reportaron pacientes con neuropatía diabética sometidos a intervención con plantillas y calzado terapéutico en comparación con un grupo control. La calidad de las publicaciones se evaluó mediante la escala PEDro y la evidencia mediante la clasificación GRADE. En cuanto al metaanálisis, se realizó la agrupación de datos homogéneos y comparables. Resultados Se incluyeron 11 estudios, lo que resultó en una muestra de 1.443 participantes. Siete artículos presentaron datos suficientes para el metaanálisis. En el corto plazo, el riesgo relativo de protección fue de 0,23 (IC 95%; 0,07; 0,72), mientras que en el largo plazo el riesgo fue de 0,32 (IC 95%; 0,21; 0,48). La escala GRADE señaló baja calidad de evidencia en cuanto a la protección a corto plazo y alta calidad a largo plazo En el análisis cualitativo, seis estudios concluyeron que hubo reducción en la presión plantar del grupo de intervención. Conclusión Se encontró efecto protector del uso de plantillas en el desarrollo de úlceras a corto y largo plazo. (AU)


Objective To investigate the level of efficacy of personalized insoles and therapeutical shoes in plantar pressure and ulceration incidence reduction in the presence of diabetic neuropathy. Methodology The data bases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahls, Central Cochrane and Lilacs were surveyed in January/2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included that reported diabetic neuropathy patients submitted to intervention with insoles and therapeutical shoes compared to a control group. The quality of the publications was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the evidence by the GRADE classification. Regarding the meta-analysis, the grouping of homogeneous and comparable data was carried out. Results Eleven studies were included, which resulted in a sample containing 1,443 participants. Seven papers presented enough data for the meta-analysis. In the short term, the protection relative risk was 0.23 (IC95% 0.07;0.72), while in the long term, the risk was 0.32 (IC95% 0.21;0.48). The GRADE scale pointed out low evidence quality regarding short-term protection and high quality in the long term. In the qualitative analysis, six studies concluded that there was reduction in the plantar pressure of the intervention group. Conclusion Protective effect of using insoles was found in the development of ulcers in the short and long term. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Úlcera del Pie , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Aparatos Ortopédicos
12.
Santiago de Chile; Chile. Ministerio de Salud; feb. 2024. 81 p.
Monografía en Español | LILACS, MINSALCHILE | ID: biblio-1561162

RESUMEN

El presente documento entrega a los equipos de salud contenidos para la estandarización del manejo de los factores predisponentes de la amputación, criterios para su indicación y manejo post quirúrgico. Si bien este documento hace alusión a una condición de salud en particular, es fundamental tener presente que la atención de salud de las personas con enfermedades crónicas se basa en la integralidad del cuidado, el que considera a la persona en el contexto de su multimorbilidad, por lo que el abordaje presentado se utiliza con fines operativos.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posoperatorios , Chile , Causalidad , Úlcera del Pie , Pie Diabético , Diabetes Mellitus , Amputación Quirúrgica
13.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 40(3): e3776, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402455

RESUMEN

Diabetic foot ulcer complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy is highly prevalent, slow healing and have a poor prognosis. The final progression leads to amputation, or may even be life-threatening, seriously affecting patients' quality of life. The treatment of lower extremity vasculopathy is the focus of clinical practice and is vital to improving the healing process of diabetic foot ulcers. Recently, a number of clinical trials on diabetic foot ulcers with lower extremity vasculopathy have been reported. A joint group of Chinese Medical Association (CMA) and Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) expert representatives reviewed and reached a consensus on the guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this kind of disease. These guidelines are based on evidence from the literature and cover the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy and the application of new treatment approaches. These guidelines have been put forward to guide practitioners on the best approaches for screening, diagnosing and treating diabetic foot ulcers with lower extremity vasculopathy, with the aim of providing optimal, evidence-based management for medical personnel working with diabetic foot wound repair and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Glutamatos , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada , Humanos , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/terapia , Consenso , Calidad de Vida , Extremidad Inferior
14.
Int Wound J ; 21(2): e14748, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358067

RESUMEN

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are common complications of diabetes mellitus, while diabetic peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers, and the pathogenic mechanisms between these three diseases still need further investigation. The keywords 'diabetic foot ulcer', 'diabetic peripheral neuropathy' and 'atherosclerosis' were used to search for related gene sets in the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened and analysed for GO, KEGG and enrichR functional enrichment. Potential three disease biomarkers were identified by SVM-SVM-RFE and LASSO regression analysis. The results were also validated using external datasets and discriminability was measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC). Finally, biomarkers and co-upregulated genes were analysed through the GSEA and Attie Laboratories diabetes databases. A total of 11 shared genes (KRT16, CD24, SAMD9L, SRGAP2, FGL2, GPR34, DDIT4, NFE2L3, FBLN5, ANXA3 and CPA3), two biomarkers (SAMD9L and FGL2) and one co-upregulated gene (CD24) were screened. GO and KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs, enrichr enrichment analysis of shared differential genes and GSEA analysis of biomarkers showed that these significant genes were mainly focused on vasoregulatory, inflammatory-oxidative stress and immunomodulatory pathways. In this study, we used bioinformatics to investigate the intrinsic relationship and potential mechanisms of three common lower extremity complications of diabetes and identified two pivotal genes using the LASSO model and the SVM-RFE algorithm, which will further help clinicians to understand the relationship between diabetic complications, improve the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot problems and help doctors to identify the potential risk factors of diabetic foot.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pie Diabético , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Úlcera del Pie , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/genética , Neuropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/genética , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Biomarcadores , Factores de Transcripción con Cremalleras de Leucina de Carácter Básico , Fibrinógeno , Proteínas Activadoras de GTPasa
15.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 162(8): 394-397, 2024 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216395

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus and its complications are one of the main burdensome health problems at the present time. The diabetic foot is one of the most characteristic complications. MATERIAL, METHODS AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to describe the results and complications obtained in a series of 25 cases of diabetic foot treated by minimally invasive offloading osteotomies. RESULTS: Of the total number of interventions, 18 were performed on refractory ulcers with prior conservative treatment, for a mean (±SD) duration of 29.28±18.42 months. The mean follow-up period was 26.46±4.89 months. Weighted pooled rates of response to treatment were as follows: 100% for ulcer healing (with a mean healing time of 22.41±7.01 days), 5.56% for ulcer recurrence, and 16.67% for ulcer transfer. In 7cases, a preventive intervention was performed on areas with pre-ulcerative lesions. Of the total number of cases, only 3presented mild infection in the intervention area. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive offloading osteotomy is a technically simple intervention, which presents a high success rate with minimal complications in our series.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Cicatrización de Heridas
16.
J Invest Dermatol ; 144(7): 1633-1648.e14, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237729

RESUMEN

Wound research has typically been performed without regard for where the wounds are located on the body, despite well-known heterogeneities in physical and biological properties between different skin areas. The skin covering the palms and soles is highly specialized, and plantar ulcers are one of the most challenging and costly wound types to manage. Using primarily the porcine model, we show that plantar skin is molecularly and functionally more distinct from nonplantar skin than previously recognized, with unique gene and protein expression profiles, broad alterations in cellular functions, constitutive activation of many wound-associated phenotypes, and inherently delayed healing. This unusual physiology is likely to play a significant but underappreciated role in the pathogenesis of plantar ulcers as well as the last 25+ years of futility in therapy development efforts. By revealing this critical yet unrecognized pitfall, we hope to contribute to the development of more effective therapies for these devastating nonhealing wounds.


Asunto(s)
Fenotipo , Piel , Cicatrización de Heridas , Animales , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Porcinos , Piel/patología , Piel/lesiones , Piel/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Úlcera del Pie/fisiopatología , Úlcera del Pie/patología , Humanos , Femenino , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Piel , Pie
17.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14348, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667546

RESUMEN

The present study aims to assess the risk factors for foot ulcers in patients undergoing dialysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and to provide evidence-based guidance for prevention and treatment. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Wanfang Data from the database inception until May 2023 to identify relevant studies investigating the risk factors for foot ulcers in dialysis patients with ESRD. Two independent researchers conducted the literature screening and data extraction. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Ultimately, six articles comprising 1620 patients were included for analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that male (OR, 1.464; 95% CI: 1.082-1.980, p = 0.013), hypertension (OR, 1.781; 95% CI: 1.293-2.4550, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR, 5.014; 95% CI: 2.514-9.998, p < 0.001), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (OR, 2.993; 95% CI: 1.477-6.065, p = 0.002) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OR, 2.498; 95% CI:1.466-4.256, p = 0.001) were risk factors for foot ulcers in dialysis patients with ESRD. Conversely, the female sex (OR, 0.683; 95% CI: 0.505-0.924, p = 0.013) was a protective factor against foot ulcers. Our analysis revealed that male sex, hypertension, PAD, T1DM and T2DM were risk factors for foot ulcers in patients undergoing dialysis for ESRD. Conversely, the female sex was a protective factor against foot ulcers. Therefore, it is crucial to strengthen health education that targets patients with these risk factors and regularly screen high-risk individuals. Early detection and treatment can help delay disease progression.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Hipertensión , Fallo Renal Crónico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/etiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera del Pie/etiología , Úlcera del Pie/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología
18.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 40(3): e3701, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493206

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) confers a significantly increased risk of failure to heal and major lower limb amputation for people with diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU). Determining performance of non-invasive bedside tests for predicting likely DFU outcomes is therefore key to effective risk stratification of patients with DFU and PAD to guide management decisions. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the performance of non-invasive bedside tests for PAD to predict DFU healing, healing post-minor amputation, or need for minor or major amputation in people with diabetes and DFU or gangrene. METHODS: A database search of Medline and Embase was conducted from 1980 to 30 November 2022. Prospective studies that evaluated non-invasive bedside tests in patients with diabetes, with and without PAD and foot ulceration or gangrene to predict the outcomes of DFU healing, minor amputation, and major amputation with or without revascularisation, were eligible. Included studies were required to have a minimum 6-month follow-up period and report adequate data to calculate the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio for the outcomes of DFU healing, and minor and major amputation. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: From 14,820 abstracts screened 28 prognostic studies met the inclusion criteria. The prognostic tests evaluated by the studies included: ankle-brachial index (ABI) in 9 studies; ankle pressures in 10 studies, toe-brachial index in 4 studies, toe pressure in 9 studies, transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2 ) in 7 studies, skin perfusion pressure in 5 studies, continuous wave Doppler (pedal waveforms) in 2 studies, pedal pulses in 3 studies, and ankle peak systolic velocity in 1 study. Study quality was variable. Common reasons for studies having a moderate or high risk of bias were poorly described study participation, attrition rates, and inadequate adjustment for confounders. In people with DFU, toe pressure ≥30 mmHg, TcPO2 ≥25 mmHg, and skin perfusion pressure of ≥40 mmHg were associated with a moderate to large increase in pretest probability of healing in people with DFU. Toe pressure ≥30 mmHg was associated with a moderate increase in healing post-minor amputation. An ABI using a threshold of ≥0.9 did not increase the pretest probability of DFU healing, whereas an ABI <0.5 was associated with a moderate increase in pretest probability of non-healing. Few studies investigated amputation outcomes. An ABI <0.4 demonstrated the largest increase in pretest probability of a major amputation (PLR ≥10). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic capacity of bedside testing for DFU healing and amputation is variable. A toe pressure ≥30 mmHg, TcPO2 ≥25 mmHg, and skin perfusion pressure of ≥40 mmHg are associated with a moderate to large increase in pretest probability of healing in people with DFU. There are little data available evaluating the prognostic capacity of bedside testing for healing after minor amputation or for major amputation in people with DFU. Current evidence suggests that an ABI <0.4 may be associated with a large increase in risk of major amputation. The findings of this systematic review need to be interpreted in the context of limitations of available evidence, including varying rates of revascularisation, lack of post-revascularisation bedside testing, and heterogenous subpopulations.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/etiología , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Gangrena , Estudios Prospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Amputación Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención
19.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 40(3): e3649, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37132203

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most interventions to prevent foot ulcers in people with diabetes do not seek to reverse the foot abnormalities that led to the ulcer. Foot-ankle exercise programs target these clinical and biomechanical factors, such as protective sensation and mechanical stress. Multiple RCTs exist investigating the effectiveness of such programs, but these have never been summarised in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the available scientific literature in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane databases and trial registries for original research studies on foot-ankle exercise programs for people with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration. Both controlled and non-controlled studies were eligible for selection. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias of controlled studies and extracted data. Meta-analysis (using Mantel-Haenszel's statistical method and random effect models) was performed when >2 RCTs were available that met our criteria. Evidence statements, including the certainty of evidence, were formulated according to GRADE. RESULTS: We included a total of 29 studies, of which 16 were RCTs. A foot-ankle exercise programme of 8-12 weeks duration for people at risk of foot ulceration results in: (a) no increase or decrease risk of foot ulceration or pre-ulcerative lesion (Risk Ratio (RR): 0.56 (95% CI: 0.20-1.57)); (b) no increase or decrease risk of adverse events (RR: 1.04 (95% CI: 0.65-1.67)); (c) not increase or decrease barefoot peak plantar pressure during walking (Mean Difference (MD): -6.28 kPa (95% CI: -69.90-57.34)); (d) no increase or decrease health-related quality of life (no meta-analysis possible). Likely results in increases in ankle joint and first metatarsalphalangeal joint range of motion (MD: 1.49° (95% CI: -0.28-3.26)) may result in improvements in neuropathy signs and symptoms (MD: -1.42 (95% CI: -2.95-0.12)), may result in a small increase in daily steps in some people (MD: 131 steps (95% CI: -492-754)), and may not increase or decrease foot and ankle muscle strength and function (no meta-analysis was possible). CONCLUSIONS: In people at risk of foot ulceration, a foot-ankle exercise programme of 8-12 weeks duration may not prevent or cause diabetes-related foot ulceration. However, such a programme likely improves the ankle joint and first metatarsalphalangeal joint range of motion and neuropathy signs and symptoms. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base, and should also focus on the effects of specific components of foot-ankle exercise programs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Humanos , Articulación del Tobillo , Pie Diabético/etiología , Pie Diabético/prevención & control , Tobillo , Calidad de Vida , Terapia por Ejercicio
20.
Curr Diabetes Rev ; 20(3): e050523216594, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37151066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus leading to foot ulcer is a serious complication, and it is considered a global epidemic. Neuropathyand high blood glucose levels are the primary causes of foot ulcers. Fifteen percent of people with diabetes develop foot ulcers, and these foot disorders are the main cause of lower extremity amputation among such patients. INTRODUCTION: Complications of diabetic foot, affecting the lower extremities are common and quite complex and life-threatening. This review focuses on the life-threatening factors associated with diabetic foot ulcers and also the diagnosing and preventive measures. Neuropathy assessment and the range of foot ulcers were accurately examined. CONCLUSION: Novel therapies focusing on the vascularity of the lower limbs, infection control, and ischemic control are being developed to mainly treat nonhealing ulcers.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Úlcera del Pie , Hiperglucemia , Humanos , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/terapia , Amputación Quirúrgica , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...