Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.106
Filtrar
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e944063, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND This prospective study from a single center aimed to compare the perioperative blood loss (PBL) in 79 patients with intertrochanteric fractures (IF) treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using 3 regimens of combined tranexamic acid (TXA) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), proposing a novel therapy of 4-dose TXA. MATERIAL AND METHODS We recruited 79 patients and randomly divided them into 3 groups. The 4-dose TXA group (22 patients) received 1.0 g intravenous TXA 30 min before surgery and 1.0 g at intervals of 3, 6, and 9 h before surgery. The 1-dose TXA group (25 patients) received 1.0 g intravenous TXA 30 min before surgery, while the control group (32 patients) did not receive TXA. LMWH was applied 12 h after surgery in each group. The primary metrics evaluated included hidden blood loss (HBL), total blood loss (TBL), and the number and incidence rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS Analysis of the HBL revealed that the 4-dose TXA group had the lowest average (583.13±318.08 ml), followed by the 1-dose TXA group (902.94±509.99 ml), and the control group showed the highest (1154.39±452.06 ml) (P<0.05). A similar result was observed for TBL (4-dose group: 640.86±337.22 ml, 1-dose group: 971.74±511.14 ml, control group: 1226.27±458.22 ml, P<0.05). Regarding DVT, the 4-dose TXA group had 5 cases (incidence rate 22.73%), the 1-dose TXA group had 6 cases (incidence rate 24.00%), and the control group had 8 cases (incidence rate 25.00%), with no significant difference among groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Treatment using 4-dose TXA and LMWH can effectively reduce PBL without increasing the DVT risk in IF patients with IMN.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular , Fracturas de Cadera , Ácido Tranexámico , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos
2.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 16(3): 397-404, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827762

RESUMEN

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after cephalomedullary nailing in elderly patients with pertrochanteric fractures and to analyze the risk factors related to ONFH. Methods: A total of 689 consecutive patients with cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures at our hospital were recruited. Of these, 368 patients who met the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled. ONFH after cephalomedullary nailing was identified by reviewing patients' electronic charts and serial radiographs. The ONFH group was then compared with the non-ONFH group. Results: ONFH was identified in 9 of 368 patients (2.4%). The time to diagnosis of ONFH averaged 23.8 months (range, 5-54 months) after index surgery. The mean age, body mass index, and bone mineral density (T-score in femur neck) were 84.1 ± 7.1 years, 23.7 ± 3.6 kg/m2, and -3.1 ± 0.7 kg/m2, respectively. The times from injury to surgery, from admission to surgery, and operation time averaged 4.2 ± 2.7 days, 3.6 ± 2.6 days, and 87.2 ± 30.0 minutes, respectively. Among 9 patients, 3 underwent conversion arthroplasty. The ONFH group had advanced age (p = 0.029), more basicervical fracture components (p = 0.002), and inadequate reduction (p = 0.045) compared to the non-ONFH group. On multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.61;, p = 0.022), basicervical fracture components (OR, 24.58; p = 0.001), and inadequate reduction (OR, 4.11; p = 0.039) were identified as risk factors of ONFH. Conclusions: Although ONFH is relatively rare after cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, its risk may increase with advanced age, basicervical fracture components, and inadequate reduction. Therefore, in patients with these risk factors, meticulous and longer follow-up is needed even after bone union.


Asunto(s)
Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Incidencia , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 34(4): 23-32, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842230

RESUMEN

The incidence of proximal femur fractures is increasing due to aging of the population. Intramedullary nails are the mainstay of treatment for intertrochanteric hip fractures mainly due to their better biomechanical properties compared to dynamic hip screw devices, shorter operative time, and less blood loss during surgery. However intramedullary nail fixation is not devoid of complications. The purpose of this study is to look at complications related to intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric hip fractures in a major trauma center. A retrospective study was conducted including all patients having suffered an intertrochanteric femur fracture and treated with intramedullary nails from October 1, 2020, to October 1, 2022, in the Orthopaedic Surgery Clinic. The intramedullary hip systems used were the Stryker Gamma3 Nail and the VITUS PF Nail. All complications following the postoperative period were recorded in detail. Overall, 240 patients with a mean age of 82.3 years treated with hip intramedullary devices were identified. Superior cutout of the lag screw in two patients (females 90 and 87 years old) was identified 8 and 10 weeks following initial surgery. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head was identified in one patient (male 81 years old) which occurred 12 weeks postoperatively. All three cases were revised by replacing the nail with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Periprosthetic fractures occurred in an 88-year-old male and a 73-year-old female following an injury distal to the stem and were managed by replacing the nail with a long stem device (Long Gamma3). One case of metalwork fracture was also recorded. There are many advantages in managing intertrochanteric hip fractures with intramedullary hip devices such as shorter theater time, less blood loss, and improved biomechanical properties. However, complications such as cutout of the lag screw, AVN, and periprosthetic fracture are serious and require complex revision surgery.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/etiología
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 456, 2024 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures yields satisfactory bone union rates; however, it may adversely affect postoperative shoulder function. To date, factors affecting mid- or long-term shoulder functional outcomes following intramedullary nail fixation have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mid-term functional outcomes over 5 years postoperatively following antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 patients who underwent surgery using an antegrade intramedullary nail for acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. We divided the patients into clinical failure and no clinical failure groups using an age- and sex-adjusted Constant score of 55 at the final follow-up as the cutoff value. We compared preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors between the two groups. RESULTS: Five of the 33 patients had poor shoulder functional outcomes (adjusted Constant score < 55) at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years postoperatively. Proximal protrusion of the nail at the time of bone union (P = 0.004) and older age (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with clinical failure in the univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that proximal protrusion of the nail (P = 0.031) was a risk factor for poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide new information on predictive factors affecting mid-term outcomes following osteosynthesis using antegrade nails. Our results demonstrated that proximal protrusion of the nail was significantly associated with poor mid-term functional shoulder outcomes. Therefore, particularly in older adults, it is essential to place the proximal end of the intramedullary nail below the level of the articular cartilage.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas del Húmero , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Curación de Fractura , Recuperación de la Función , Adulto Joven
5.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 336, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femoral head varus triggers poor clinical prognosis in intertrochanteric fracture patients with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation. Studies present that changes in nail position and screw insertion angles will affect fixation stability, but the biomechanical significance of these factors on the risk of femoral head varus has yet to be identified in PFNA fixed patients. METHODS: Clinical data in PFNA fixed intertrochanteric fracture patients have been reviewed, the relative position of intermedullary nail has been judged in the instant postoperative lateral radiography. Regression analyses have been performed to identify the effect of this factor on femoral head varus. Corresponding biomechanical mechanism has been identified by numerical mechanical simulations. RESULTS: A clinical review revealed that ventral side nail insertion can trigger higher risk of femoral head varus, corresponding numerical mechanical simulations also recorded poor fixation stability in models with ventral side nail insertion, and changes in the trajectory of anti-rotation blade will not obviously affect this tendency. CONCLUSIONS: Ventral side insertion of intramedullary nail can trigger higher risk of femoral head varus in PFNA fixed patients by deteriorating the instant postoperative biomechanical environment, and changes in blade trajectory cannot change this tendency biomechanically. Therefore, this nail position should be adjusted to optimize patients' prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Cabeza Femoral , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Cabeza Femoral/fisiopatología , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía
6.
Injury ; 55(7): 111602, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of fracture-related infection has undergone radical progress following the development of international guidelines. However, there is limited consideration to the realities of healthcare in low-resource environments due to a lack of available evidence in the literature from these settings. Initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture union is frequently used in low- and middle-income countries despite the lack of published clinical evidence to support its practice. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture union in the management of fracture-related infection. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture healing followed by definitive eradication surgery to manage fracture-related infections following intramedullary fixation was performed. Indications for this approach were; a soft tissue envelope not requiring reconstructive surgery, radiographic evidence of stable fixation with adequate alignment, and progression towards fracture union. RESULTS: This approach was associated with successful treatment in 51/55 (93 %) patients. Fracture union was achieved in 52/55 (95 %) patients with antimicrobial suppression alone. Remission of infection was achieved in 54/55 (98 %) patients following definitive infection eradication surgery. Following antibiotic suppression, 6/46 (13 %) pathogens isolated from intra-operative samples demonstrated multi-drug resistance. CONCLUSION: Initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture healing followed by definitive infection eradication surgery was associated with successful treatment in 93 % of patients. The likelihood of remission of infection increases when eradication surgery is performed in a healed bone. This approach was not associated with an increased risk of developing multi-drug-resistant infections compared to contemporary bone infection cohorts in the published literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Curación de Fractura , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano
7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 405, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783225

RESUMEN

Femoral head varus is an important complication in intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) fixation. Theoretically, extending the length of the intramedullary nail could optimize fixation stability by lengthening the force arm. However, whether extending the nail length can optimize patient prognosis is unclear. In this study, a review of imaging data from intertrochanteric fracture patients with PFNA fixation was performed, and the length of the intramedullary nail in the femoral trunk and the distance between the lesser trochanter and the distal locking screw were measured. The femoral neck varus status was judged at the 6-month follow-up. The correlation coefficients between nail length and femoral neck varus angle were computed, and linear regression analysis was used to determine whether a change in nail length was an independent risk factor for femoral neck varus. Moreover, the biomechanical effects of different nail lengths on PFNA fixation stability and local stress distribution have also been verified by numerical mechanical simulations. Clinical review revealed that changes in nail length were not significantly correlated with femoral head varus and were also not an independent risk factor for this complication. In addition, only slight biomechanical changes can be observed in the numerical simulation results. Therefore, commonly used intramedullary nails should be able to meet the needs of PFNA-fixed patients, and additional procedures for longer nail insertion may be unnecessary.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Simulación por Computador
8.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 413, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures significantly contribute to disability, predominantly in the elderly. Despite this, data on postoperative pneumonia following femoral fracture surgeries remains sparse. Our study sought to explore the incidence and impact of postoperative pneumonia on outcomes following such surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed femoral fracture patients hospitalized from 2016 to 2022. We scrutinized postoperative outcomes, including pneumonia, hospital stay duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and in-hospital mortality. We established stringent diagnostic criteria for postoperative pneumonia, incorporating both clinical signs and radiological evidence, excluding patients with prior infections or those discharged within 24 h post-surgery. Statistical analyses involved Chi-square and t-tests, linear regression, and logestic regression using SPSS. RESULTS: Out of 636 patients, 10.8% were diagnosed with postoperative pneumonia. The average age was 79.55 ± 8.57 years, with a male prevalence of 47.8%. Common comorbidities were hypertension (78.3%), diabetes (60.9%), and cardiovascular diseases (40.6%). Surgical interventions were categorized as intramedullary nailing (40.6%), partial hip replacement (37.7%), and dynamic hip screw (21.7%). Postoperative pneumonia was associated with older age (AOR = 1.053, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.087, p = 0.002), ICU admission (AOR = 2.283, 95% CI 1.256 to 4.148, p = 0.007), and longer length of hospital stay (AOR = 1.079, 95% CI 1.030 to 1.130, p = 0.001). The presence of pneumonia was associated with a 2.621-day increase in hospitalization after adjusting for other variables (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.454 to 3.789). CONCLUSION: This study accentuates the clinical significance of postoperative pneumonia in femoral fracture patients, with a noted incidence of 10.8%. A notable association with older age, prolonged hospital stays, and ICU admissions was observed, underscoring the necessity of addressing this complication to improve patient outcomes and healthcare resource allocation.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Tiempo de Internación , Neumonía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos
9.
Jt Dis Relat Surg ; 35(2): 276-284, 2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the intramedullary nail and conventional plate for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures from clinical comparative trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of English databases was carried out in the Springer, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 2023. Studies on calcaneal fractures treated by an intramedullary nail or a plate were considered for inclusion. Endpoints included duration of operation, length of hospital stay, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, postoperative functional score, radiological parameters, and complications. The mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) as the combined variables, as well as the 95% confidence intervals, (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Five retrospective controlled studies covering 473 feet at the one-year follow-up met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that there were significant differences in the duration of operation (MD: -10.81; 95% CI: -16.32, -5.31; p=0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD: -3.65; 95% CI: -4.35, -2.95; p<0.00001). No significant differences were found regarding postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (MD: 0.36; 95% CI: -3.89, 4.61; p=0.87), VAS (MD: 1.95; 95% CI: -0.30, 4.21; p=0.09), or postoperative Böhler angle (MD: 0.94; 95% CI: -0.04, 1.92; p=0.06) between the two groups. The incidence of total complications (RD: -0.31; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.17; p<0.0001) and wound-healing complications (RD: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.30, -0.03; p=0.02) were lower in the intramedullary nail group. There were no significant differences in the incidences of revision surgery, implant removal, superficial wound infection, deep infection, and nonunion. CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional plates, the intramedullary nail showed a shorter duration of operation, reduced length of hospital stay, and fewer postoperative total complications and wound-healing complications in treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Placas Óseas , Calcáneo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Calcáneo/lesiones , Calcáneo/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792901

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: This retrospective cohort study analyzes mechanical complications in hip fracture surgery using the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) implant. It investigates the correlation of these complications with demographic, intraoperative, and radiological factors, aiming to identify associated risk factors and suggest improvements in clinical surveillance and treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 253 patients diagnosed with pertrochanteric hip fractures treated between 2017 and 2021, with 126 meeting the criteria for a minimum 6-month follow-up. Data on demographics, American Anesthesia Association Classification (ASA), comorbidities, AO/OTA [AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)/OTA (Orthopedic Trauma Association)] fracture classification, procedural details, and time to failure were collected. Radiographs were evaluated for reduction quality, the tip-apex distance (TAD), progressive varus deviation, and identification of mechanical complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: The predominant AO/OTA fracture classification was 31A2 in 67 cases (52.7%). Reduction quality was deemed good or acceptable in 123 cases (97.6%). The mean time to failure was 4.5 months (range: 2.2-6). The average TAD was 18 mm (range: 1.2-36), with a mean progressive varus deviation of 2.44° (range: 1.30-4.14). A good or acceptable reduction quality was observed in 97.6% of cases. Mechanical complications occurred in 21.4% of patients, with significant associations found with the lateral cortex fracture, use of a TFNA implant with a 130° angle, open reduction, and absence of prior osteoporosis treatment. Conclusions: The study provides insights into mechanical complications in proximal femur fractures treated with the TFNA nail, emphasizing the need for enhanced clinical and radiographic surveillance, especially in patients without osteoporosis treatment. Our findings support the necessity for further clinical studies comparing these outcomes with other implant designs and underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies to reduce complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas Femorales Proximales
11.
Int Orthop ; 48(7): 1839-1848, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580780

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The optimal choice of distal locking modes remains a subject due to limited available data, and therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between distal locking mode and postoperative mechanical complications in an intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) population who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary fixation with a PFNA-II. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery with PFNA-II fixation in a university teaching hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were potentially eligible. Based on the distal locking mode, patients were classified into static, dynamic, and limited dynamic groups, among which the differences were tested using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether the distal locking mode was independently associated with the risk of postoperative one year mechanical complications, adjusting for covariates and potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings. RESULT: Among 507 eligible patients, 33 (6.5%) developed postoperative mechanical complications. In the univariate analysis, sex (P = 0.007), fracture type (P = 0.020), LAT Parker ratio (P = 0.023), and lateral femoral (P = 0.003) wall showed that the differences were significant. Compared to the static group, the limited dynamic group and the dynamic group showed higher odds of postoperative mechanical complications (OR = 3.314, 95% CI: 1.215-9.041; and OR = 3.652, 95% CI: 1.451-9.191, respectively). These associations were robust across a series of analyses, including adjusting for confounders and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Using a distal non-static locking mode significantly increases the risk of postoperative mechanical complications, and static locking could be a preferable option when treating an intertrochanteric fracture.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Estudios de Cohortes
12.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(4): 1779-1794, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578441

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The patients with femoral metastasis in the inter- or subtrochanteric area could be treated with intramedullary nailing or prosthetic reconstruction, however, it is controversial which surgical treatment could offer less complications and implant failure. Our purpose was to define the risk of complications and implant survival in patients treated with intramedullary nailing or prosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: We analyzed studies reporting the risk of complications, reoperations and removal of the implant in patients treated with intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty, arthroplasty or megaprosthesis. RESULTS: We analyzed 27 studies (1346 patients) reporting patients treated with intramedullary nail (51%), hemiarthroplasty (15%), arthroplasty (2%), megaprosthesis with (25%) or without (7%) acetabular component. No difference was found in the overall risk of complications between patients treated with intramedullary nailing 6%, hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty 7% and megaprosthesis 11% (p = 0.23). However, patients treated with megaprosthesis had increased risk of reoperation due to infection (70%), compared to the patients treated with intramedullary nail (13%), and patients treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (23%) (p = 0.02). Revision due to disease progression was required in 61% of the patients treated with intramedullary nail, but not in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty, total arthroplasty, and megaprosthesis (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with megaprosthesis had higher risk of reoperation due to infection, while patients treated with intramedullary nailing had higher risk of revision due to disease progression. Regarding patients treated with megaprosthesis, the risk of reoperation due to dislocation was higher in those treated with acetabular component.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Femorales , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Neoplasias Femorales/cirugía , Neoplasias Femorales/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Hemiartroplastia/efectos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos
13.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(5): 2101-2108, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653838

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: According to reports, the modified extra-articular parapatellar approach allows the performance of tibial nailing in the semi-extended position without the concern of joint violation. However, there remains no special study that has provided a detailed assessment of the benefits and risks of this approach for treating distal tibial fractures (DTFs). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with DTFs after intramedullary nailing using a lateral parapatellar extra-articular (LPE) approach in comparison to using the suprapatellar (SP) and transpatellar (TP) approaches. METHODS: Data were collected from 99 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Comparisons were conducted between the groups regarding the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, complications, knee pain, knee range of motion (ROM), the Lysholm Knee Scale (LKS), the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and radiological findings. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. Fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies were performed in the LPE (27.47 ± 4.98) and SP (26.03 ± 5.12) groups than in the TP group (30.20 ± 7.42; P<0.001). When compared with the other two approaches, the LPE approach was associated with less knee pain (P<0.001) and better knee ROM (P<0.001) at one week postoperative. No significant intergroup differences were detected in the incidence of complications, LKS scores (P = 0.687) and OMAS (P = 0.926). Radiological findings demonstrated that postoperative tibial alignment (P = 0.853), the time of bony union and rate of non-union were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: The LPE approach can serve as a safe and effective option for tibial nailing, as it offers favourable outcomes in knee pain relief and knee ROM in the early postoperative period and is equivalent to the other two approaches in terms of the incidence of complications, fracture healing, functional recovery and postoperative alignment for patients with DTFs.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Radiografía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Rótula/cirugía , Rótula/lesiones , Rótula/diagnóstico por imagen
14.
JBJS Case Connect ; 14(2)2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579021

RESUMEN

CASE: A 51-year-old man and 64-year-old woman with bilateral cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties (CR-TKAs) who sustained unilateral periprosthetic distal femur fractures above their CR-TKA and experienced knee instability secondary to an iatrogenic posterior-cruciate-ligament (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) injury from retrograde intramedullary nailing. Both patients recovered knee stability after undergoing revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Many CR-TKA designs have sufficient medial-lateral intercondylar distance to place a retrograde nail, femoral components with a relatively posterior transition from the trochlear groove to the intercondylar box will necessitate a nail starting point closer to the PCL origin. This may contribute to iatrogenic postoperative knee instability for patients with CR-TKA designs.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674292

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. Materials and Methods: A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Conclusions: Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(14): e37647, 2024 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blocking screw technique has been widely applied in the treatment of long shaft fractures. However, the evidence with regard to whether intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique has better clinical efficacy over other is not clear. The aim of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy and complications of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fractures. METHODS: The PuMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and Weipu data were searched for studies of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw in treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fracture published up to Aug 31 2023. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed, relevant data were extracted, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis of parameters related to the consequences. RESULT: Twenty articles were included, including 1267 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the non-blocking screw group, the blocking screw group had longer operation time (WMD = 13.24; 95% CI = 5.68-20.79, P = .0006) and more intraoperative fluoroscopy times (WMD = 57.62; 95% CI = 25.82-89.42, P = .0002). However, the postoperative therapeutic response rate was higher (OR = 5.60; 95% CI = 2.10-14.93, P = .0006), postoperative ankle joint function was better (OR = 3.48; 95% CI = 1.20-10.13, P = .02), and fracture healing rate was higher (OR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.43-8.89, P = .006), fracture healing time was shorter (WMD = -3.59; 95% CI = -4.96 to -2.22, P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was less (WMD = -54.80; 95% CI = -88.77 to -20.83, P = .002), hospitalization time was shorter (WMD = -1.66; 95% CI = -2.08 to -1.24, P < .00001), and complications were less (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.16-0.89, P = .01). There was no statistical significance in the range of motion of knee joint between the 2 groups (WMD = 10.04; 95% CI = -1.51 to 21.59, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence shows that intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of lower limb long bone fracture has the advantages of good clinical efficacy, high fracture healing rate, short fracture healing time, good joint function, less complications and so on, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Tornillos Óseos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior , Clavos Ortopédicos
17.
Injury ; 55(6): 111549, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621349

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received ß-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Fracturas de Cadera , Hipotensión , Humanos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos
18.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 290, 2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with cement enhancement enhances the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. However, whether it is superior to hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The present study aimed to determine which treatment has better clinical outcomes among older patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 elderly patients with osteoporosis who developed intertrochanteric fractures and underwent PFNA combined with cement-enhanced internal fixation (n = 52, CE group), and hemiarthroplasty (n = 50, HA group) from September 2012 to October 2018. All the intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Additionally, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion rates, postoperative weight-bearing time, hospitalization time, Barthel Index of Activities Daily Living, Harris score of hip function, visual analog (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The CE group had significantly shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, and longer postoperative weight-bearing time than the HA group. The CE group had lower Barthel's Index of Activities of Daily Living, lower Harris' score, and higher VAS scores in the first and third months after surgery than the HA group, but no difference was observed between the two groups from 6 months to 12 months. There was no significant difference in the total post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of PFNA combined with a cement-enhanced internal fixation technique led to shorter operative time and lesser intraoperative blood loss and trauma in elderly patients as compared to HA.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Hemiartroplastia , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Hemiartroplastia/efectos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Actividades Cotidianas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8364, 2024 04 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600312

RESUMEN

This study retrospectively assessed radiographic outcomes and risk factors associated with non-union in femoral shaft fragmentary segmental fractures (AO/OTA 32C3) treated with reamed antegrade intra-medullary nailing. Radiological outcomes, including union and alignment, were evaluated. The risk factors for non-union were investigated, including demographics and treatment-related characteristics, such as the number of interlocking screws, segmentation length, main third fragment length, distance of the main third fragment, width ratio and exposed nail length in one cortex from immediate post-operative radiographs. Multivariate logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Among 2295 femoral shaft fracture patients from three level-1 trauma centers, 51 met the inclusion criteria. The radiological union was achieved in 37 patients (73%) with a mean union time of 10.7 ± 4.8 months. The acceptable axial alignment was observed in 30 patients (59%). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified only exposed nail length as a significant risk factor for non-union (odds ratio: 1.599, p = 0.003) and the cut-off value was 19.1 mm (sensitivity, 0.786; specificity, 0.811). The study revealed high rates of non-union (27%) and malalignment (41%). Therefore, patients who underwent intramedullary nailing with an exposed nail length greater than 19.1 mm or about twice the nail diameter should be cautioned of the potential non-union.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Curación de Fractura
20.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 108(2): 139-144, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38558039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic injury to the infrapatellar branches of saphenous nerve is a common complication following tibial nailing. This lesion seems to be directly related to the surgical approach adopted for nail insertion. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the current literature in order to assess the eventual superiority of one surgical approach for tibial nailing over the others in limiting the neurological impairment related to infrapatellar branch injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The available literature was systematically screened searching papers dealing with iatrogenic injury to the infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve after intramedullary tibial nailing. The terms "Saphenous" and "Infrapatellar branch" were used in combination with "intramedullary nailing" and "tibial fractures", supplying no limits regarding the publication year. Only publications in English were considered. Case reports, technical notes, instructional course, literature reviews, biomechanical and/ or in vitro studies were all excluded. Coleman methodological score was performed in all the retained articles. RESULTS: Four articles matched the inclusion criteria. There were one original article and three retrospective study. Hypoesthesia and a larger extension of the area of sensory-loss were more frequently observed after vertical incision approach in three out of four articles. A trend towards a lower rate of iatrogenic nerve damage using a transverse incision was found in the remaining one, without any statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid infrapatellar nerve lesion, horizontal or oblique incisions or percutaneous approaches should be favored, although in some cases a longitudinal incision is required. Limited-extension incisions could minimize the risk and the incidence of this complication.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/etiología , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/prevención & control , Clavos Ortopédicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...