RESUMEN
This study compares graduate medical education (GME) payments between nonprofit and for-profit hospitals between 2011 and 2020 to assess how hospitals value GME.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Financiación Gubernamental , Administración Hospitalaria , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Hospitales , Internado y Residencia/economía , Estados Unidos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/economía , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/organización & administración , Gobierno FederalRESUMEN
Importance: Health systems play a central role in the delivery of health care, but relatively little is known about these organizations and their performance. Objective: To (1) identify and describe health systems in the United States; (2) assess differences between physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems; and (3) compare quality and cost of care delivered by physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems. Evidence Review: Health systems were defined as groups of commonly owned or managed entities that included at least 1 general acute care hospital, 10 primary care physicians, and 50 total physicians located within a single hospital referral region. They were identified using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrative data, Internal Revenue Service filings, Medicare and commercial claims, and other data. Health systems were categorized as academic, public, large for-profit, large nonprofit, or other private systems. Quality of preventive care, chronic disease management, patient experience, low-value care, mortality, hospital readmissions, and spending were assessed for Medicare beneficiaries attributed to system and nonsystem physicians. Prices for physician and hospital services and total spending were assessed in 2018 commercial claims data. Outcomes were adjusted for patient characteristics and geographic area. Findings: A total of 580 health systems were identified and varied greatly in size. Systems accounted for 40% of physicians and 84% of general acute care hospital beds and delivered primary care to 41% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Academic and large nonprofit systems accounted for a majority of system physicians (80%) and system hospital beds (64%). System hospitals were larger than nonsystem hospitals (67% vs 23% with >100 beds), as were system physician practices (74% vs 12% with >100 physicians). Performance on measures of preventive care, clinical quality, and patient experience was modestly higher for health system physicians and hospitals than for nonsystem physicians and hospitals. Prices paid to health system physicians and hospitals were significantly higher than prices paid to nonsystem physicians and hospitals (12%-26% higher for physician services, 31% for hospital services). Adjusting for practice size attenuated health systems differences on quality measures, but price differences for small and medium practices remained large. Conclusions and Relevance: In 2018, health system physicians and hospitals delivered a large portion of medical services. Performance on clinical quality and patient experience measures was marginally better in systems but spending and prices were substantially higher. This was especially true for small practices. Small quality differentials combined with large price differentials suggests that health systems have not, on average, realized their potential for better care at equal or lower cost.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Administración Hospitalaria , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Gobierno , Hospitales/clasificación , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
La celebración en el 2019 de una década de trabajo ininterrumpido del primer hospital ligero diseñado en Cuba fue motivo para la realización de este trabajo, que tuvo como objetivo describir los principales resultados en los aspectos de meso y microgestión hospitalaria del Centro Especializado Ambulatorio Héroes de Playa Girón de Cienfuegos, desde el 2009 hasta el 2019. Múltiples investigaciones mostraron la utilidad de la gestión por procesos para garantizar la calidad de la atención médica y la integración de los programas de seguridad institucional y del paciente en las funciones gerenciales y asistenciales. La primera gestión hospitalaria del Centro Especializado Ambulatorio, sobre la base de las mejores experiencias nacionales e internacionales, cumplió con los objetivos del diseño para el cual fue creado al integrar calidad, racionalidad y eficiencia. Esta experiencia puede ser ejemplo para otras instituciones que precisen de un centro de atención ambulatoria y muy corta estadía en la concepción de un hospital universitario(AU)
The celebration in 2019 of a decade of continuous work of the first ambulatory hospital designed in Cuba motivated the production of this work, that had as an objective to describe the main results in the aspects of hospital meso and micro-management of Héroes de Playa Girón Specialized Ambulatory Center of Cienfuegos province, from 2009 to 2019. Several research works showed the usefulness of management by processes to guarantee the quality of medical care and the integration of institutional and patients safety programs in management and care functions. The first hospital management of the Specialized Ambulatory Center, based on the best national and international experiences, accomplished the objectives for what it was design to by integrating quality, rationality and efficiency. This experience would be an example for other institutions that need an ambulatory care center and a short time in the creation of a university hospital(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , CubaRESUMEN
Structural factors can influence hospital costs beyond case-mix differences. However, accepted measures on how to distinguish hospitals with regard to cost-related organizational and regional differences are lacking in Switzerland. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify and assess a comprehensive set of hospital attributes in relation to average case-mix adjusted costs of hospitals. Using detailed hospital and patient-level data enriched with regional information, we derived a list of 23 cost predictors, examined how they are associated with costs, each other, and with different hospital types, and identified principal components within them. Our results showed that attributes describing size, complexity, and teaching-intensity of hospitals (number of beds, discharges, departments, and rate of residents) were positively related to costs and showed the largest values in university (i.e., academic teaching) and central general hospitals. Attributes related to rarity and financial risk of patient mix (ratio of rare DRGs, ratio of children, and expected loss potential based on DRG mix) were positively associated with costs and showed the largest values in children's and university hospitals. Attributes characterizing the provision of essential healthcare functions in the service area (ratio of emergency/ ambulance admissions, admissions during weekends/ nights, and admissions from nursing homes) were positively related to costs and showed the largest values in central and regional general hospitals. Regional attributes describing the location of hospitals in large agglomerations (in contrast to smaller agglomerations and rural areas) were positively associated with costs and showed the largest values in university hospitals. Furthermore, the four principal components identified within the hospital attributes fully explained the observed cost variations across different hospital types. These uncovered relationships may serve as a foundation for objectifying discussions about cost-related heterogeneity in Swiss hospitals and support policymakers to include structural characteristics into cost benchmarking and hospital reimbursement.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Generales/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Niño , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Hospitales Generales/organización & administración , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The syndemic of injection drug use and serious injection-related infections is leading to increasing mortality in the USA. Although outpatient treatment with medications for opioid use disorder reduces overdose risk and recurrent infections, hospitalisation remains common. We evaluated the clinical impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based strategies to address the US opioid epidemic. METHODS: We developed a microsimulation model to compare the cost-effectiveness of: standard hospital care-detoxification for opioids, no addiction consult service (status quo); expanded inpatient prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder, including bridge prescriptions (ie, medication until they can see an outpatient provider) when possible (medications for opioid use disorder with bridge); implementation of addiction consult services within the hospital (addiction consult services alone); and a combined medication for opioid use disorder with addiction consult services strategy (combined). We used clinical trials and observational cohorts to inform model inputs. Outcomes were life-years, discounted costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, hospitalisations, and deaths. We did deterministic sensitivity analyses on key model inputs related to costs and sequelae of drug use and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to further address uncertainty. FINDINGS: Among people who inject opioids in the USA, we estimated that expanding medications for opioid use disorder with bridge prescriptions would reduce hospitalisations and overdose deaths by 3·2% and 3·6%, respectively, and the combination of expanded medications with opioid use disorder along with addiction consult sevices would reduce hospitalisations and overdoses by 5·2% and 6·6%, respectively, compared with the status quo. Mean lifetime costs ranged from US$731 400 (95% credible interval 447 911-859 189 for the medications for opioid use disorder strategy) to $741 200 (470 930-868 551 for the combined strategy) per person. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per life-year gained, medications for opioid use disorder with bridge and combined strategies were cost-effective ($7600 and $14 300, respectively). A scenario that assumed ideal access to harm reduction services came to the same conclusions as the base case and our results were robust in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: The combined interventions of expanding hospital-based prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder and implementing addiction consult services could improve life expectancy, be cost-effective, and could be the basis for a comprehensive hospital-based strategy for addressing the opioid epidemic in the USA and countries with similar opioid epidemics. FUNDING: National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Epidemia de Opioides/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Método de Montecarlo , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/mortalidad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economíaRESUMEN
Importance: Little is known about whether a clinician having multiple hospital affiliations (ie, 1 clinician working across multiple teams and organizations) is associated with clinician practice style and cost. The measurement of this association requires adjusting for selection into multihospital affiliations based on both observable and unobservable clinician characteristics. Objective: To evaluate the association of multiple hospital affiliations with clinician service use, breadth of procedures used, and costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare Part B data from 2016 through 2017 in a fixed-effects panel data design to compare service use, procedure breadth, and costs between clinicians with multiple affiliations (treatment group) and clinicians with a single affiliation (control group), with adjustment for volume, patients, and clinician characteristics. The study also controlled for unobserved (time-invariant) clinician characteristics using individual clinician fixed effects. Clinicians with Medicare claims, a reported National Provider Identifier, and affiliation data within Medicare Physician Compare were included for a total sample of 1â¯073â¯252 observations (633â¯552 unique clinicians) for medical services and 358â¯669 observations (210â¯260 unique clinicians) for drug prescribing. Statistical analyses were performed from February 1 to October 15, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Service use is the total number of medical (or drug) services that clinicians render to their Medicare beneficiaries within a given year, procedure breadth is the total number of unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes that are associated with clinicians' medical (or drug) services within a given year, and costs represent the total standardized amount paid by Medicare for the medical (or drug) services. Additional measures were multiple-hospital affiliations, Accountable Care Organization affiliation, and controls across clinician and patient characteristics. Results: The medical service sample consisted of 633â¯552 clinicians (248â¯359 women [39.2%]; mean [SD] of 19.6 [12.5] years of experience), and the drug service sample consisted of 210â¯260 clinicians (74â¯875 women [35.6%]; mean [SD] of 21.6 [12.3] years of experience). For medical services, clinicians with multiple practice affiliations used a mean 8.2% (95% CI, 7.5%-8.9%; P < .001) more medical services per patient, drew on a mean 5.4% (95% CI, 5.1%-5.7%; P < .001) wider set of procedures within their medical care, and incurred a mean 8.6% (95% CI, 7.9%-9.2%; P < .001) more in medical costs. Pertaining to drug services, clinicians with multiple practice affiliations used a mean 2.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.9%; P < .001) more drug services per patient, drew on a mean 1.0% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.4%; P < .001) wider set of procedures within their medical care, and incurred a mean 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.7%; P < .001) more in drug costs. Significant results were also found across extensive and intensive margins of hospital affiliation, and supplemental analysis further indicated heterogenous treatment associations across clinician specialties. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that a clinician having multihospital affiliations was associated with greater service use, procedure breadth, and costs across both medical and drug services. These findings suggest that clinician affiliations ought to be considered as part of health care delivery design and potential cost-containment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Costos de Hospital/organización & administración , Medicare/economía , Afiliación Organizacional/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Administración Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: To report revolutionary reorganization of academic gastroenterology division from COVID-19 pandemic surge at metropolitan Detroit epicenter from 0 infected patients on March 9, 2020, to > 300 infected patients in hospital census in April 2020 and > 200 infected patients in April 2021. SETTING: GI Division, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, has 36 GI clinical faculty; performs > 23,000 endoscopies annually; fully accredited GI fellowship since 1973; employs > 400 house staff annually since 1995; tertiary academic hospital; predominantly voluntary attendings; and primary teaching hospital, Oakland-University-Medical-School. METHODS: This was a prospective study. Expert opinion. Personal experience includes Hospital GI chief > 14 years until 2020; GI fellowship program director, several hospitals > 20 years; author of > 300 publications in peer-reviewed GI journals; committee-member, Food-and-Drug-Administration-GI-Advisory Committee > 5 years; and key hospital/medical school committee memberships. Computerized PubMed literature review was performed on hospital changes and pandemic. Study was exempted/approved by Hospital IRB, April 14, 2020. RESULTS: Division reorganized patient care to add clinical capacity and minimize risks to staff of contracting COVID-19 infection. Affiliated medical school changes included: changing "live" to virtual lectures; canceling medical student GI electives; exempting medical students from treating COVID-19-infected patients; and graduating medical students on time despite partly missing clinical electives. Division was reorganized by changing "live" GI lectures to virtual lectures; four GI fellows temporarily reassigned as medical attendings supervising COVID-19-infected patients; temporarily mandated intubation of COVID-19-infected patients for esophagogastroduodenoscopy; postponing elective GI endoscopies; and reducing average number of endoscopies from 100 to 4 per weekday during pandemic peak! GI clinic visits reduced by half (postponing non-urgent visits), and physical visits replaced by virtual visits. Economic pandemic impact included temporary, hospital deficit subsequently relieved by federal grants; hospital employee terminations/furloughs; and severe temporary decline in GI practitioner's income during surge. Hospital temporarily enhanced security and gradually ameliorated facemask shortage. GI program director contacted GI fellows twice weekly to ameliorate pandemic-induced stress. Divisional parties held virtually. GI fellowship applicants interviewed virtually. Graduate medical education changes included weekly committee meetings to monitor pandemic-induced changes; program managers working from home; canceling ACGME annual fellowship survey, changing ACGME physical to virtual site visits; and changing national conventions from physical to virtual. CONCLUSION: Reports profound and pervasive GI divisional changes to maximize clinical resources devoted to COVID-19-infected patients and minimize risks of transmitting infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Gastroenterología/educación , Administración Hospitalaria/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ciudades/economía , Ciudades/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Gastroenterología/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Michigan/epidemiología , Afiliación Organizacional/economía , Afiliación Organizacional/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The patient protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to improve population health by requiring nonprofit hospitals (NFPs) to conduct triennial community health needs assessments and address the identified needs. In this context, some states have encouraged collaboration between hospitals and local health department (LHD) to increase the focus of community benefit spending onto population health. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine whether a 2012 state law that required NFPs to collaborate with LHDs in local health planning influenced hospital population health improvement spending. RESEARCH DESIGN: We merged Internal Revenue Service data on NFP community benefit spending with data on hospital, county and state-level characteristics and estimated a difference-in-differences specification of hospital population health spending in 2009-2016 that compared the difference between hospitals that were required to collaborate with LHDs to those that were not, before and after the requirement. MEASURES: The primary outcome was population health spending divided by operating expenses. RESULTS: We found that the requirement for hospital-LHD collaboration was associated with increased mean population health spending of â¼$393,000-$786,000 (P=0.03). This association was significant in 2015-2016, perhaps reflecting the lag between assessments and implementation. Urban hospitals were responsible for most of the increased spending. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers have sought to encourage hospitals to increase their investment in population health; however, overall community benefit spending on population health has remained flat. We found that requiring hospital-LHD collaboration was associated with increased hospital investment in population health. It may be that hospitals increase population health spending because collaboration improves expected effectiveness or increases hospital accountability.
Asunto(s)
Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro , Administración en Salud Pública/métodos , Prioridades en Salud , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , New York , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Salud PoblacionalAsunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/normas , Política de Salud/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Pandemias/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Incertidumbre , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The explosion of electronic documentation associated with Meaningful Use-certified electronic health record systems has led to a massive increase in provider workload for completion and finalization of patient encounters. Delinquency of required documentation affects multiple areas of hospital operations. We present the major stakeholders affected by delinquency of the electronic medical record and examine the differing perspectives to gain insight for successful engagement to reduce the burden of medical record delinquency.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Gestión de la Información en Salud/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Gestión de la Información en Salud/economía , Gestión de la Información en Salud/normas , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Uso Significativo/organización & administración , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Programa exibido na Tv Aperipê 6.1 - 18.05.2019
Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Sistemas Locales de Salud/organización & administración , Administración en Salud Pública/economía , Recursos Financieros en Salud/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Personal de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic services are highly critical in the success of treatment processes, overly costly nonetheless. Accordingly, hospitals generally seek the private partnership in the provision of such services. This study intends to explore the incentives owned by both public and private sector in their joint provision of diagnostic services under the public-private partnership agreement. METHOD: A qualitative, exploratory study was employed in Tehran hospitals from October 2017 to March 2018. Around 25 face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the purposively recruited hospital managers, heads of diagnostic services and managers of private companies. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using conventional content analysis, assisted by "MAXQDA-12". RESULTS: Three main categories and nine sub-categories represented the incentives of public sector, and four main categories and seven sub-categories signified those of private sector. The incentives of public sector included the status-quo remediation, upstream requirements, and personal reasons. As such, the individual, social and economic incentives and legal constraints were driving the behavior of the private sector. CONCLUSIONS: Financial problem and gain were the most noted incentives by the partners. Attention to the either side's incentives and aims is likely to ensure the durability and effectiveness of such partnerships in the health sector.
Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo/psicología , Servicios de Diagnóstico/economía , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo , Adulto , Servicios de Diagnóstico/organización & administración , Femenino , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Privado/organización & administración , Sector Público/economía , Sector Público/organización & administración , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado/organización & administración , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outbreak size and hospital cost effects of bacterial whole-genome sequencing availability in managing a large-scale hospital outbreak. METHODS: We built a hybrid discrete event/agent-based simulation model to replicate a serious bacterial outbreak of resistant Escherichia coli in a large metropolitan public hospital during 2017. We tested the 3 strategies of using whole-genome sequencing early, late (actual outbreak), or not using it and assessed their associated outbreak size and hospital cost. The model included ward dynamics, pathogen transmission, and associated hospital costs during a 5-month outbreak. Model parameters were determined using data from the Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection (N = 4809 patient admissions) and local clinical knowledge. Sensitivity analyses were performed to address model and parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: An estimated 197 patients were colonized during the outbreak, with 75 patients detected. The total outbreak cost was A$460 137 (US$317 117), with 6.1% spent on sequencing. Without sequencing, the outbreak was estimated to result in 352 colonized patients, costing A$766 921 (US$528 547). With earlier detection from use of routine sequencing, the estimated outbreak size was 3 patients and cost A$65 374 (US$45 054). CONCLUSIONS: Using whole-genome sequencing in hospital outbreak management was associated with smaller outbreaks and cost savings, with sequencing costs as a small fraction of total hospital costs, supporting the further investigation of the use of routine whole-genome sequencing in hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli/genética , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Queensland , Centros de Atención TerciariaAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Economía Hospitalaria , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Economía Hospitalaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Technological advancements are the main drivers of the healthcare industry as it has a high impact on delivering the best patient care. Recent years witnessed unprecedented growth in the number of medical equipment manufactured to aid high-quality patient care at a fast pace. With this growth of medical equipment, hospitals need to adopt optimal maintenance strategies that enhance the performance of their equipment and attempt to reduce their maintenance costs and effort. In this work, a Predictive Maintenance (PdM) approach is presented to help in failure diagnosis for critical equipment with various and frequent failure mode(s). The proposed approach relies on the understanding of the physics of failure, real-time collection of the right parameters using the Internet of Things (IoT) technology, and utilization of machine learning tools to predict and classify healthy and faulty equipment status. Moreover, transforming traditional maintenance into PdM has to be supported by an economic analysis to prove the feasibility and efficiency of transformation. The applicability of the approach was demonstrated using a case study from a local hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where the Vitros-Immunoassay analyzer was selected based on maintenance events and criticality assessment as a good candidate for transforming maintenance from corrective to predictive. The dominant failure mode is metering arm belt slippage due to wear out of belt and movement of pulleys which can be predicted using vibration signals. Vibration real data is collected using wireless accelerometers and transferred to a signal analyzer located on a cloud or local computer. Features extracted and selected are analyzed using Support Vector Machine (SVM) to detect the faulty condition. In terms of economics, the proposed approach proved to provide significant diagnostic and repair cost savings that can reach up to 25% and an investment payback period of one year. The proposed approach is scalable and can be used across medical equipment in large medical centers.
Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros , Administración Hospitalaria/métodos , Internet de las Cosas , Máquina de Vectores de Soporte , Acelerometría , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Eficiencia Organizacional , Falla de Equipo , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Humanos , Inmunoensayo , Aprendizaje Automático , Mantenimiento , Factores de Tiempo , Emiratos Árabes UnidosRESUMEN
Background: Before Canada's single-payer reform, its payment system, health costs, and number of health administrative personnel per capita resembled those of the United States. By 1999, administration accounted for 31% of U.S. health expenditures versus 16.7% in Canada. No recent comprehensive analyses of those costs are available. Objective: To quantify 2017 spending for administration by insurers and providers. Design: Analyses of government reports, accounting data that providers file with regulators, surveys of physicians, and census-collected data on employment in health care. Setting: United States and Canada. Measurements: Insurance overhead; administrative expenditures of hospitals, physicians, nursing homes, home care agencies, and hospices. Results: U.S. insurers and providers spent $812 billion on administration, amounting to $2497 per capita (34.2% of national health expenditures) versus $551 per capita (17.0%) in Canada: $844 versus $146 on insurers' overhead; $933 versus $196 for hospital administration; $255 versus $123 for nursing home, home care, and hospice administration; and $465 versus $87 for physicians' insurance-related costs. Of the 3.2-percentage point increase in administration's share of U.S. health expenditures since 1999, 2.4 percentage points was due to growth in private insurers' overhead, mostly because of high overhead in their Medicare and Medicaid managed-care plans. Limitations: Estimates exclude dentists, pharmacies, and some other providers; accounting categories for the 2 countries differ somewhat; and methodological changes probably resulted in an underestimate of administrative cost growth since 1999. Conclusion: The gap in health administrative spending between the United States and Canada is large and widening, and it apparently reflects the inefficiencies of the U.S. private insurance-based, multipayer system. The prices that U.S. medical providers charge incorporate a hidden surcharge to cover their costly administrative burden. Primary Funding Source: None.
Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Canadá , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/economía , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Humanos , Casas de Salud/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
A fundamental activity in hospital operations is patient assignment, which we define as the process of assigning hospital patients to specific physician services and clinical units based on their diagnosis. When the preferred assignment is not possible, typically due to capacity limits, hospitals often allow for overflow, which is the assignment of patients to other services and/or units. Overflow accelerates assignment, but can also reduce care quality and increase length of stay. This paper develops a discrete-event simulation model to evaluate different assignment strategies. Using a simulation-based optimization approach, we evaluate and heuristically optimize these strategies accounting for expected hospital and physician profit, care quality and patient waiting time. We apply the model using data from the University of Chicago Medical Center. We find that the strategies that use heuristically optimized designation of overflow services and units increase expected profit relative to the capacity-based strategy in which overflow patients are assigned to a service and unit with the most available capacity. We also find further improvement in the strategy that uses heuristically optimized overflow services and units as well as a holding unit that holds patients until a bed in their primary or secondary unit becomes available. Additionally, we demonstrate the effects of these strategies on other performance measures such as patient concentration, waiting time, and outcomes.