Unveiling the association between HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and bladder cancer: a comprehensive analysis using Mendelian randomization, animal models, and transcriptomics.

This study utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to investigate the association between commonly prescribed drugs and bladder cancer (BLCA) risk. Our results revealed that HMG CoA reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, specifically simvastatin, are significantly associated with reduced BLCA risk. We further showed that simvastatin could significantly inhibit BLCA proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in animal models, with transcriptomic data identifying several pathways associated with these processes. Higher expression of HMGCR were linked with BLCA development and progression, and certain blood lipids, such as lipoprotein particles and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, might influence BLCA risk. These findings suggested that HMGCR inhibitors, particularly simvastatin, could be potential treatment options or adjuvant therapies for BLCA.

Absence of Pathogenic Mutations and Strong Association With HLA-DRB1*11:01 in Statin-Naïve Early-Onset Anti-HMGCR Necrotizing Myopathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) caused by antibodies against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) is an inflammatory myopathy that has been epidemiologically correlated with previous statin exposure. We characterized in detail a series of 11 young statin-naïve patients experiencing a chronic disease course mimicking a limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. With the hypothesis that HMGCR upregulation may increase immunogenicity and trigger the production of autoantibodies, our aim was to expand pathophysiologic knowledge of this distinct phenotype. METHODS: Clinical and epidemiologic data, autoantibody titers, creatine kinase (CK) levels, response to treatment, muscle imaging, and muscle biopsies were assessed. HMGCR expression in patients' muscle was assessed by incubating sections of affected patients with purified anti-HMGCR+ serum. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) with a special focus on cholesterol biosynthesis-related genes and high-resolution human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing were performed. RESULTS: Patients, aged 3-25 years and mostly female (90.9%), presented with subacute proximal weakness progressing over many years and high CK levels (>1,000 U/L). Diagnostic delay ranged from 3 to 27 years. WES did not reveal any pathogenic variants. HLA-DRB1*11:01 carrier frequency was 60%, a significantly higher proportion than in the control population. No upregulation or mislocalization of the enzyme in statin-exposed or statin-naïve anti-HMGCR+ patients was observed, compared with controls. DISCUSSION: WES of a cohort of patients with dystrophy-like anti-HMGCR IMNM did not reveal any common rare variants of any gene, including cholesterol biosynthesis-related genes. HLA analysis showed a strong association with HLA-DRB1*11:01, previously mostly described in statin-exposed adult patients; consequently, a common immunogenic predisposition should be suspected, irrespective of statin exposure. Moreover, we were unable to conclusively demonstrate muscle upregulation/mislocalization of HMGCR in IMNM, whether or not driven by statins.

Effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients treated with high-intensity statin therapy for coronary artery disease: a post-hoc analysis from the LODESTAR randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The impact of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) among patients treated with high-intensity statin therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains to be clarified. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of NODM in patients with CAD treated with rosuvastatin compared to atorvastatin in the randomized LODESTAR trial. METHODS: In the LODESTAR trial, patients with CAD were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin using a 2-by-2 factorial randomization. In this post-hoc analysis, the 3-year incidence of NODM was compared between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin treatment in the as-treated population with high-intensity statin therapy as the principal population of interest. RESULTS: Among 2932 patients without diabetes mellitus at baseline, 2377 were included in the as-treated population analysis. In the as-treated population with high-intensity statin therapy, the incidence of NODM was not significantly different between the rosuvastatin and atorvastatin groups (11.4% [106/948] versus 8.8% [73/856], hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 1.77, P = 0.071). When the risk of NODM with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin was assessed according to the achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, the risk of NODM began to increase at a LDL-C level below 70 mg/dL. The incidence of NODM was significantly greater in the rosuvastatin group than it was in the atorvastatin group when the achieved LDL-C level was < 70 mg/dL (13.9% versus 8.0%; HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.73, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among CAD patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy, the incidence of NODM was not significantly different between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. However, a drug effect of the statin type on NODM was observed when the achieved LDL-C level was < 70 mg/dL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02579499.

Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens. HYPOTHESIS: A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.

Prevalence, Associated Risk Factors, and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes of Statins Discontinuation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Statins are widely prescribed for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention; however, a significant proportion of users discontinue the medication for various reasons. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of statin therapy discontinuation, its associated factors, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from their inception to December 2022. Manual searches were also conducted on the bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies were included for qualitative data synthesis and assessed for methodological quality. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies, predominantly cohort studies (n = 38), involving 4 277 061 participants were included. The prevalence of statin discontinuation within the first year of statin initiation ranged from 0.8% to 70.5%, which was higher for primary prevention indications. Factors frequently associated with an increased likelihood of statin discontinuation included male sex, nonWhite ethnicity, smoking status, and being uninsured. Conversely, discontinuation was less likely in patients with CVD who received secondary prevention statin therapy and in patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, age showed diverse and inconsistent relationships with statin discontinuation among various age categories. Five studies that reported the cardiovascular risk of statin discontinuation within the first year of initiation showed significantly increased risk of discontinuation, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.36-3.65). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a high prevalence of statin discontinuation and an increased likelihood of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation, despite wide variability across published studies. This review highlights the importance of addressing the modifiable risk factors associated with statin discontinuation, such as smoking and lack of insurance coverage.

A systematic review of the drug-drug interaction between Statins and Quinolones.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used in cardiovascular disease (CVD) as a common lipid-lowering drug, while quinolones are widely used for the treatment of infectious diseases. It is common to see CVD in combination with infectious diseases, therefore it is often the case that statins and quinolones are used in combination. Data suggest combinations of statin and quinolone may be associated with potentially life-threatening myopathy, rhabdomyolysis and acute hepatitis. This systematic review aims to characterize data regarding patients affected by the statin-quinolone interaction. METHODS: The purpose of this systematic review was to collect and evaluate the evidence surrounding statin-quinolone drug interactions and to discuss related risk mitigation strategies. The following databases were searched: PubMed (Medline), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. The systematic electronic literature search was conducted with the following search terms. In this study, three types of search terms were used: statins-related terms, quinolones-related terms, and drug interactions-related terms. RESULTS: There were 16 case reports that met the criteria for qualitative analysis. Patients were involved in the following adverse reactions: rhabdomyolysis (n = 12), acute hepatitis (n = 1), muscle weakness (n = 1), hip tendinopathy (n = 1), or myopathy (n = 1). In the included literature, patients vary in the dose and type of statins they take, including simvastatin (n = 10) at a dose range of 20-80 mg/d and atorvastatin (n = 4) at a dose of 80 mg/d. There were 2 patients with unspecified statin doses, separately using simvastatin and atorvastatin. The quinolones in combination were ciprofloxacin (n = 9) at a dose range of 800-1500 mg/d, levofloxacin (n = 6) at a dose range of 250-1000 mg/d, and norfloxacin (n = 1) in an unspecified dose range. 81% of the case patients were over 60 years of age, and about 1/3 had kidney-related diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, post-transplantation, and severe glomerulonephritis. Nearly two-third of the patients were on concomitant cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors, or organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with statin-quinolone combination should be monitored more closely for changes in aspartate aminotransferase or creatine kinase (CK) levels, and muscle symptoms, especially in patients with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, with simvastatin and high-dose atorvastatin, over 60 years of age, with kidney-related diseases, and on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Treat-to-target or high-intensity statin treatment in older adults with coronary artery disease: a post hoc analysis of the LODESTAR trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal statin treatment strategy that is balanced for both efficacy and safety has not been clearly determined in older adults with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In the post hoc analysis of the LODESTAR (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-targeting statin therapy versus intensity-based statin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease) trial, the impact between a treat-to-target strategy versus a high-intensity statin therapy strategy was compared in older adults (aged 75 years or older). The goal of treat-to-target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was 50-70 mg/dl. The primary endpoint comprised the three-year composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or coronary revascularisation. RESULTS: Among 4,400 patients with CAD enrolled in the LODESTAR trial, 822 (18.7%) were aged 75 years or older. Poor clinical outcomes and risk factors for atherosclerosis were more frequently observed in older adults than in younger population (<75 years old). Among these older adults with CAD, the prescription rate of high-intensity statin was significantly lower in the treat-to-target strategy group throughout the study period (P < 0.001). The mean LDL-C level for three years was 65 ± 16 mg/dl in the treat-to-target strategy group and 64 ± 18 mg/dl in the high-intensity statin group (P = 0.34). The incidence of primary endpoint occurrence was 10.9% in the treat-to-target strategy group and 12.0% in the high-intensity statin group (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.38, P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity statin therapy is theoretically more necessary in older adults because of worse clinical outcomes and greater number of risk factors for atherosclerosis. However, the primary endpoint occurrence with a treat-to-target strategy with an LDL-C goal of 50-70 mg/dl was comparable to that of high-intensity statin therapy and reduced utilisation of a high-intensity statin. Taking efficacy as well as safety into account, adopting a tailored approach may be considered for this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02579499.

X chromosome dosage drives statin-induced dysglycemia and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Statin drugs lower blood cholesterol levels for cardiovascular disease prevention. Women are more likely than men to experience adverse statin effects, particularly new-onset diabetes (NOD) and muscle weakness. Here we find that impaired glucose homeostasis and muscle weakness in statin-treated female mice are associated with reduced levels of the omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), impaired redox tone, and reduced mitochondrial respiration. Statin adverse effects are prevented in females by administering fish oil as a source of DHA, by reducing dosage of the X chromosome or the Kdm5c gene, which escapes X chromosome inactivation and is normally expressed at higher levels in females than males. As seen in female mice, we find that women experience more severe reductions than men in DHA levels after statin administration, and that DHA levels are inversely correlated with glucose levels. Furthermore, induced pluripotent stem cells from women who developed NOD exhibit impaired mitochondrial function when treated with statin, whereas cells from men do not. These studies identify X chromosome dosage as a genetic risk factor for statin adverse effects and suggest DHA supplementation as a preventive co-therapy.

Fenofibrate's impact on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes: a nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of fenofibrate on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes in patients with diabetes and statin treatment are unclear. We investigated the effects of fenofibrate on all-cause mortality and ASCVD in patients with diabetes, high triglyceride (TG) levels and statin treatment. METHODS: We performed a nationwide propensity-score matched (1:1) cohort study using data from the National Health Information Database in the Republic of Korea from 2010 to 2017. The study included 110,723 individuals with diabetes, TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, and no prior diagnoses of ASCVD who used statins and fenofibrate, and an equal matched number of similar patients who used statins alone (control group). The study outcomes included newly diagnosed myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, both (MI and/or stroke), and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a mean 4.03-year follow-up period, the hazard ratios (HR) for outcomes in the fenofibrate group in comparison to the control group were 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.827-0.933] for MI, 0.901 (95% CI 0.848-0.957) for stroke, 0.897 (95% CI 0.858-0.937) for MI and/or stroke, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.685-0.749) for all-cause death. These beneficial effects of fenofibrate were consistent in the subgroup with TG 150-199 mg/dL but differed according to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study involving individuals with diabetes and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL, the risk of all-cause death and ASCVD was significantly lower with fenofibrate use in conjunction with statin treatment compared to statin treatment alone. However, this finding was significant only in individuals with relatively high LDL-C levels.

EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Mitophagy protects against statin-mediated skeletal muscle toxicity.

EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: I. Ramesh, J. C. Campos, P. Lee, Y. Song, G. Hernandez, J. Sin, K. C. Tucker, H. Saadaeijahromi, M. Gurney, J. C. B. Ferreira, and A. M. Andres, "Mitophagy Protects Against Statin-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Toxicity," The FASEB Journal 33, no. 11 (2019): 11857-11869, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201900807RR. This Expression of Concern is for the above article, published online on August 23, 2019, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) and has been published by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Loren E. Wold; the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The Expression of Concern has been published due to concerns raised by a third party regarding a duplication between the COX-IV panel of Figure 3C and the COX-IV panel of Figure 5D. The authors have been informed about the concerns, but due to the time elapsed since publication, they could not provide the original raw data. Consequently, the journal team could not verify the validity of these figures describing different experimental conditions and could not exclude that these image duplications affect the overall conclusions of the article. Therefore, the journal has decided to issue an Expression of Concern to inform and alert the readers.

Drug-drug interactions between pemafibrate and statins on pharmacokinetics in healthy male volunteers: Open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover studies.

Elevated triglyceride levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events despite guideline-based statin treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) agonists exert a significant triglyceride-lowering effect. However, combination therapy of PPARα agonists with statins poses an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis, which is rare but a major concern of the combination therapy. Pharmacokinetic interaction is suspected to be a contributing factor to the risk. To examine the potential for combination therapy with the selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) pemafibrate and statins, drug-drug interaction studies were conducted with open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover designs for the combination of pemafibrate 0.2 mg twice daily and each of 6 statins once daily: pitavastatin 4 mg/day (n = 18), atorvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 18), rosuvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 29), pravastatin 20 mg/day (n = 18), simvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 20), and fluvastatin 60 mg/day (n = 19), involving healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetic parameters of pemafibrate and each of the statins were similar regardless of coadministration. There was neither an effect on the systemic exposure of pemafibrate nor a clinically important increase in the systemic exposure of any of the statins on the coadministration although the systemic exposure of simvastatin was reduced by about 15% and its open acid form by about 60%. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity in plasma samples from the simvastatin and pemafibrate combination group was about 70% of that in the simvastatin alone group. In conclusion, pemafibrate did not increase the systemic exposure of statins, and vice versa, in healthy male volunteers.

Early administration of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity statin therapy is currently recommended initial guideline therapy in ACS treatment. However, only a minority of patients are achieving LDL-C attainment goal at 6 months. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are on recommended guideline therapy post-ACS if LDL-C goal attainment is not achieved after high-intensity statin (4-6 weeks) and after the addition of ezetimibe if guideline goal attainment is not achieved after an additional 4-6 weeks. Thus, it has been recommended that PCSK9 inhibitors be considered earlier post-ACS. However, the efficacy of early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients remains uncertain. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies involving ACS patients who received PCSK9 inhibitors within 48 h of hospitalization were included. Common and random effects models were used to evaluate the pooled effect of early PCSK9 inhibitor administration. Nine RCTs and three cohort studies were included. RESULTS: Early PCSK9 inhibitor administration reduced the incidence of MI, ACS hospitalization, and revascularization at 6-18 months post-ACS. Although there was a drift towards reduced stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death, no statistically significant reduction was observed. Additionally, PCSK9 inhibitors significantly enhanced lipid control at 4-12 weeks after index hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients reduces MACE and improves lipid profiles. While the results propose promising benefits in terms of stroke and mortality, further research with longer follow-up is required for more decisive evidence.

Does the use of statins alter the risk of rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Statins have anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory effects which could alter the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We reviewed published literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine if statins have an impact on the risk of RA. METHODS: Case-control studies, cohort studies, or randomized controlled trials (RCT) published on the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases up to 30th October 2023 were searched. The association between statin use and risk of RA was pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine studies (four cohort, four case-control, and one RCT) were included. Overall, the analysis failed to note an association between the use of statins and the risk of RA with the pooled OR being 0.93 (95% CI 0.82, 1.06). High heterogeneity was noted with I2 = 75%. Results were consistent across study types with no association noted between prior statin use and risk of RA in case-control studies (OR: 0.88 95% CI: 0.69, 1.13), cohort studies (OR: 1.01 95% CI: 0.92, 1.10), and the lone RCT (OR: 1.40 95% CI: 0.50, 3.92). CONCLUSION: Current literature shows that there is no association between the use of statins and the risk of RA. Further rigorous studies taking into account patient factors, duration of statin exposure, and other confounders are needed to generate better evidence.

Effect modification by statin use status on the association between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and cardiovascular mortality.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have linked fine particulate matter (PM2.5) to increased cardiovascular mortality. Less is known how the PM2.5-cardiovascular mortality association varies by use of cardiovascular medications. This study sought to quantify effect modification by statin use status on the associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality from any cardiovascular cause, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke. METHODS: In this nested case-control study, we followed 1.2 million community-dwelling adults aged ≥66 years who lived in Ontario, Canada from 2000 through 2018. Cases were patients who died from the three causes. Each case was individually matched to up to 30 randomly selected controls using incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between PM2.5 and mortality. We evaluated the presence of effect modification considering both multiplicative (ratio of ORs) and additive scales (the relative excess risk due to interaction, RERI). RESULTS: Exposure to PM2.5 increased the risks for cardiovascular, CHD, and stroke mortality. For all three causes of death, compared with statin users, stronger PM2.5-mortality associations were observed among non-users [e.g. for cardiovascular mortality corresponding to each interquartile range increase in PM2.5, OR = 1.042 (95% CI, 1.032-1.053) vs OR = 1.009 (95% CI, 0.996-1.022) in users, ratio of ORs = 1.033 (95% CI, 1.019-1.047), RERI = 0.039 (95% CI, 0.025-0.050)]. Among users, partially adherent users exhibited a higher risk of PM2.5-associated mortality than fully adherent users. CONCLUSIONS: The associations of chronic exposure to PM2.5 with cardiovascular and CHD mortality were stronger among statin non-users compared to users.

Intensive Versus Moderate Statin-Based Therapies in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used for treating patients with ischemic stroke at risk of secondary cerebrovascular events. It is unknown whether Asian populations benefit from more intensive statin-based therapy for stroke recurrence. Therefore, in the present study we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of high-dose and moderate-dose statins for patients who had experienced mild ischemic stroke during the acute period. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter prospective study included patients with mild ischemic stroke who presented within 72 hours of symptom onset. The outcomes of patients in the high-intensity and moderate-intensity statin treatment groups were compared, with the main efficacy outcome being stroke recurrence and the primary safety end point being intracranial hemorrhage. The propensity score matching method was employed to control for imbalances in baseline variables. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences. In total, the data of 2950 patients were analyzed at 3 months, and the data of 2764 patients were analyzed at 12 months due to loss to follow-up. According to the multivariable Cox analyses adjusted for potential confounders, stroke recurrence occurred similarly in the high-intensity statin and moderate-intensity statin groups (3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85-1.49]; P=0.424; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.34]; P=0.519). High-intensity statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (3 months: adjusted HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.00-3.25]; P=0.048; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.10-3.16]; P=0.021). The results from the propensity score-matched analyses were consistent with those from the Cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy, high-dose statin therapy may not decrease the risk of mild, noncardiogenic ischemic stroke recurrence but may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1900025214.

Exploring the Relationship Between Atorvastatin and Memory Loss: A Comprehensive Analysis Integrating Real-World Pharmacovigilance and Mendelian Randomization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atorvastatin is a drug widely used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Current observational studies suggest that atorvastatin may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (especially memory loss). However, some studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may be an important factor in cognitive dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess whether memory loss is an adverse effect of atorvastatin and to further clarify its causality through Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: We extracted real-world data from the FAERS database (Quarter 1 2004 to Quarter 1 2023). Disproportionality analysis methods and measures of association such as the reporting odds ratio (OR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and polynomial Gamma Poisson distribution reduction were used to assess whether memory loss was an adverse effect of atorvastatin. In addition, we used MR to evaluate causality in depth. RESULTS: In the pharmacovigilance analysis of atorvastatin, we extracted four datasets of clinical symptoms associated with memory loss from the FAERS database [Amnesia (n = 1196), Memory impairment (n = 840), Transient global amnesia (n = 38), and Retrograde amnesia (n = 9)]. The reporting OR, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and Gamma Poisson distribution reduction all showed positive results for amnesia, transient global amnesia, and retrograde amnesia, while the reporting OR and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network also showed positive results for memory disorders. Thus, memory loss was a frequent side effect of atorvastatin. The MR analyses were used to further evaluate the association between statins and memory loss. The results of the MR analysis (statins and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw (mre) (ß = 0.11 [OR = 1.11], P = 0.01 < 0.05) and the OR and ß directions of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The results of the MR analysis (statins and mitochondrial DNA copy number) are as follows: Ivw(mre) (ß = -0.03 [OR = 0.96], P < 0.01) and the OR and ß direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode are the same. The results of the MR analysis (DNA copy number and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw(ß = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94], P = 0.04 < 0.05) and the OR and ß direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The pleiotropy test did not find horizontal diversity in our results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that memory loss is a notable adverse event associated with atorvastatin and provides evidence indicating a potential causal relationship between atorvastatin and memory loss. We also found that statins may further affect memory by affecting mitochondrial function. Therefore, in the clinical use of atorvastatin, it is important to carefully monitor the changes in cognitive function of patients. Second, a pharmacovigilance analysis combined with MR was used in this study to provide a new approach for the study of adverse drug reactions. This comprehensive analysis method helps to evaluate the safety of drugs and the risk of adverse reactions more comprehensively and provides doctors with a more accurate clinical decision-making basis.

Rhabdomyolysis Risk: The Dangers of Tribulus Terrestris, an Over-the-Counter Supplement.

BACKGROUND Over-the-counter (OTC) supplement use is a very common practice within the United States. Supplements are not tightly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. There are many case reports involving OTC supplement adverse effects and medication interactions, but there remains minimal clinical research regarding these subjects. Rhabdomyolysis is one interaction and adverse effect frequently documented in case reports among a variety of OTC supplements, although, to date, there is no documentation of rhabdomyolysis occurring from an interaction between the supplement Tribulus terrestris and atorvastatin. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department in rhabdomyolysis with a mild transaminitis after taking the over-the-counter supplement Tribulus terrestris while on long-term atorvastatin. His rhabdomyolysis peaked at day 4 after cessation of the Tribulus and atorvastatin and aggressive fluid resuscitation with a normal saline bolus at admission followed by a D5 sodium bicarbonate drip later transitioned to a normal saline drip with subsequent down-trending of the creatinine phosphokinase levels. CONCLUSIONS Tribulus terrestris is an herbal supplement used for erectile dysfunction and energy. Recent research suggests it to be a moderate CYP 3A4 inhibitor that plays a significant role in metabolism of statin and many other commonly prescribed medications. This may put patients at increased risk of developing serious adverse effects, including rhabdomyolysis and drug-induced liver injury. Screening patients for over-the-counter supplement use and educating them on the potential risks of their use is extremely important for inpatient and outpatient healthcare professionals to avoid dangerous medication interactions.