A head-to-head comparison of humoral and cellular immune responses of five COVID-19 vaccines in adults in China.

Introduction: Various COVID-19 vaccine trials have shown that vaccines can successfully prevent symptomatic cases of COVID-19 and death. Head-to-head comparisons help to better understand the immune response characteristics of different COVID-19 vaccines in humans. Methods: We randomly selected 20 participants from each of five ongoing Phase II trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, SARS-CoV 2-specific immune responses to DNA vaccine (INO-4800), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2), Adenovirus-vectored vaccine (CONVIDECIA), Protein subunit vaccine (Recombinant COVID- 19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells)), Inactivated Vaccine (KCONVAC) were examined longitudinally in healthy adults between Jan 15, 2021 and July 5, 2021 for 6 months. RBD-IgG titres were detected by ELISA, neutralising antibody titer were detected by pseudoviral neutralization and immune cell response were detected by flow cytometry. Results: At the first visit (V1), 100% of individuals who received the BNT162b2, CONVIDECIA, or KCONVAC vaccines experienced seroconversion of neutralizing and binding antibodies in the serum. Except for the Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells) vaccine having the highest neutralizing antibody GMT at the second visit (although there was no statistically significant difference in geometric mean titers between V1 and V2), the rest of the vaccines had the highest levels of binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies at V1. The neutralizing antibodies GMT of all vaccines showed a significant decrease at V3 compared to V1. The neutralizing antibody GMT against the omicron variant of all vaccines at V1 showed a significant decrease compared to the wild strain. We observed statistically significant differences in Tcm cells and RBD-specific memory B cells among various vaccines. Discussion: BNT162b2 (mRNA vaccine) exhibits the highest antibody levels among the five vaccines evaluated, regardless of whether the target is the wild-type virus or its variants. However, its cellular immune response may be weaker compared to CONVIDECIA (adenovirus type 5 vector vaccine).

Single and two-dose typhoid conjugate vaccine safety and immunogenicity in HIV-exposed uninfected and HIV-unexposed uninfected Malawian children.

Vaccine safety and immunogenicity data in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed uninfected (HEU) children are important for decision-making in HIV and typhoid co-endemic countries. In an open-label study, we recruited Malawian HEU and HIV unexposed uninfected (HUU) infants aged 9 - 11 months. HEU participants were randomized to receive Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Vi-TT) at 9 months, Vi-TT at 15 months, or Vi-TT at 9 and 15 months. HUU participants received Vi-TT at 9 and 15 months. Safety outcomes included solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AE) and serious AEs (SAEs) within 7 days, 28 days, and 6 months of vaccination, respectively. Serum was collected before and at day 28 after each vaccination to measure anti-Vi IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cohort 1 (66 participants) enrollment began 02 December 2019, and follow-up was terminated before completion due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cohort 2 (100 participants) enrollment began 25 March 2020. Solicited AEs were mostly mild, with no significant differences between HEU and HUU participants or one- and two-dose groups. All six SAEs were unrelated to vaccination. Anti-Vi geometric mean titers (GMT) increased significantly from 4.1 to 4.6 ELISA units (EU)/mL at baseline to 2572.0 - 4117.6 EU/mL on day 28 post-vaccination, and similarly between HEU and HUU participants for both one- and two-dose schedules. All participants seroconverted (>4-fold increase in GMT) by the final study visit. Our findings of comparable safety and immunogenicity of Vi-TT in HUU and HEU children support country introductions with single-dose Vi-TT in HIV-endemic countries.

Adult indication 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine clinical development overview: formulation, safety, immunogenicity (dosing and sequence), coadministration, and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: There was no 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) adult antibody concentration threshold regulatory criterion for licensure - unlike the pediatric indication; consequently, for the adult indication, PCV13 serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titer (GMT) values were immunobridged to the 23-valent plain polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) to infer efficacy against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Subsequently, a double-blind, randomized, controlled PCV13 efficacy trial (CAPiTA) was performed in community-living, older adults to confirm efficacy against vaccine-serotype IPD (VT-IPD) and establish efficacy against vaccine-serotype pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (VT-CAP). AREAS COVERED: This article summarizes 31 publications from the PCV13 adult indication clinical development trials and other PCV13 clinical studies, organized by formulation, reactogenicity and safety, immunogenicity, coadministration, and clinical efficacy. EXPERT OPINION: PCV13 had a favorable safety profile with an OPA response generally greater than PPV23 irrespective of age and of previous pneumococcal vaccination. PCV13 primed for enhanced immune responses with subsequent PCV13 or PPV23 dosing. Conversely, PPV23 was shown to blunt the response to subsequent PCV13. CAPiTA demonstrated PCV13 efficacy for at least five years against both VT-IPD and VT-CAP. The PCV13 clinical development program provided fundamental insights into this vaccine's adult-specific immune responses and confirmed the advantages of conjugate over plain polysaccharide technology.

Immunogenicity and safety of Vero cell culture-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine: a phase 3 study in Chinese infants.

BACKGROUND: Japanese encephalitis (JE) is a severe infectious disease of the central nervous system. Vaccination with Vero cell culture-derived vaccines may effectively reduce JE incidence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, blinded, positive-controlled clinical trial in China involving 600 healthy infants aged 6-11 months, participants were divided into experimental and control groups administered JEV-PI and JEV-LI, respectively. Antibody titers were determined after 0- and 7-day immunization schedules. A booster dose followed 12 months later. RESULTS: After primary vaccination and before booster vaccination, the positive conversion rate, geometric mean titer (GMT), and geometric mean increase (GMI) of JEV-PI-neutralizing antibodies exceeded those of JEV-LI. After booster immunization, the GMT and GMI of JEV-PI were higher than those of JEV-LI. After primary immunization, the local, systemic, and overall adverse reactions were of grades 1 and 2, with a low incidence of grade 3. After booster immunization, these differences were mainly grades 1 and 2, with no differences between JEV-PI and JEV-LI. CONCLUSION: JEV-PI is a promising vaccine as infants acquired long-lasting and highly neutralizing immune antibodies after inoculation with JEV-PI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj = 203130; registration number: ChiCTR2300074692; registration date: 14/08/2023).

Immunogenicity and real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Lebanon: Insights from primary and booster schemes, variants, infections, and hospitalization.

In this study, we conducted a case-control investigation to assess the immunogenicity and effectiveness of primary and first booster homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens against infection and hospitalization, targeting variants circulating in Lebanon during 2021-2022. The study population comprised active Lebanese military personnel between February 2021 and September 2022. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated hospitalization was retrospectively determined during different variant-predominant periods using a case-control study design. Vaccines developed by Sinopharm, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca as well as Sputnik V were analyzed. Prospective assessment of humoral immune response, which was measured based on the SARS-CoV-2 antispike receptor binding domain IgG titer, was performed post vaccination at various time points, focusing on Sinopharm and Pfizer vaccines. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS and GraphPad Prism. COVID-19 VE remained consistently high before the emergence of the Omicron variant, with lower estimates during the Delta wave than those during the Alpha wave for primary vaccination schemes. However, vaccines continued to offer significant protection against infection. VE estimates consistently decreased for the Omicron variant across post-vaccination timeframes and schemes. VE against hospitalization declined over time and was influenced by the variant. No breakthrough infections progressed to critical or fatal COVID-19. Immunogenicity analysis revealed that the homologous Pfizer regimen elicited a stronger humoral response than Sinopharm, while a heterologous Sinopharm/Pfizer regimen yielded comparable results to the Pfizer regimen. Over time, both Sinopharm's and Pfizer's primary vaccination schemes exhibited decreased humoral immunity titers, with Pfizer being a more effective booster than Sinopharm. This study, focusing on healthy young adults, provides insights into VE during different pandemic waves. Continuous research and monitoring are essential for understanding vaccine-mediated immune responses under evolving circumstances.

Comparing the immunogenicity of COVID-19 infection and vaccination in pregnant women as measured by anti-S IgG.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a critical time for women, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases like COVID-19. This study aims to determine the immunogenicity of COVID-19 in pregnant women who have been infected compared to those who have received the inactive COVID-19 vaccine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, pregnant women who received the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm) and those with a history of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy were studied. Participants who had experienced stillbirth, received different COVID-19 vaccines, or had intrauterine fetal death were excluded from the study. Overall, the study included 140 participants. The participants were divided into two groups of 70 participants - pregnant women who received the Sinopharm vaccine and pregnant women who had COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Before delivery, blood samples were collected from all mothers to evaluate the maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) level. Blood samples were also taken from the baby's umbilical cord during delivery to measure the newborn's IgG level. Additionally, blood samples were collected from babies whose mothers showed signs of acute infection to measure their IgM levels and evaluate vertical transmission. FINDINGS: The study found a significant relationship between the mean level of maternal IgG and umbilical cord IgG within the groups (P < 0.001). The highest levels of maternal IgG (2.50 ± 2.17) and umbilical cord IgG (2.43 ± 2.09) were observed in pregnant women with a previous COVID-19 infection and no history of vaccination (P < 0.001). Only one baby was born with a positive IgM, and this baby was born to a mother who showed signs of COVID-19 infection in the last five days of pregnancy. The mother was 28 years old, with a BMI of 33; it was her first pregnancy, and she gave birth to a male newborn at term. CONCLUSION: Administering an inactivated vaccine during pregnancy can generate immunity in both the mother and the child. However, the vaccine's immunity level may not be as potent as that conferred by COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Nonetheless, the risk of vertical transmission of COVID-19 is considered minimal and can be classified as negligible.

mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination of lung transplant recipients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection induces durable SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T cells.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are particularly at risk of developing severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), but are also difficult to protect by vaccination due to their immunocompromised state. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in LTRs who had a prior natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. At a median of 184 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, LTRs were vaccinated twice with the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine, with a 28-day interval. Blood samples were obtained pre-vaccination, 28 days after the first dose, and 28 days and 6 months after the second dose. Spike (S-) and nucleocapsid (N-) specific antibodies were measured, as well as neutralization of the ancestral and Omicron BA.5 variant. S-specific T cell responses were evaluated using IFN-γ ELISpot，IGRA, and activation markers by flow cytometry. Phenotyping of T cells was performed by using high-resolution spectral flow cytometry. Most LTRs with prior infection had detectable S-specific antibodies and T cells at baseline. After the first vaccination, S-specific antibody levels increased significantly; an additional increase was observed after the second vaccination. N-specific antibodies decreased during the study period, indicative of the fact that no further breakthrough infections occurred. An increase in IFN-γ producing T cells was observed after the first vaccination, but no additional boost could be detected after the second vaccination. Antibody levels and virus-specific T cell responses remained significantly higher compared to pre-vaccination levels at 6 months post-vaccination, indicating an additive and durable effect of vaccination after infection in LTRs. Neutralizing antibodies were detected against the ancestral strain and retained cross-reactivity with Omicron BA.5, albeit at lower levels. Moreover, the quantity and phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells were similar in LTRs compared to controls with hybrid immunity. In conclusion, mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are immunogenic in LTRs with prior immunity, and antibody and T cell responses are durable up to 6 months post-vaccination.

Phase 1 trial of an investigational Tdap booster vaccine with CpG 1018 adjuvant compared with Boostrix in healthy adults and adolescents.

This phase 1 trial assessed the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis vaccine combined with CpG 1018 adjuvant 1500 µg (Tdap-1018 1500 µg) or 3000 µg (Tdap-1018 3000 µg) in adults and adolescents. In this randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, dose-escalation trial, healthy participants aged 10 to 22 years received 1 dose of Tdap-1018 1500 µg, Tdap-1018 3000 µg, or Boostrix. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and booster response rates (BRRs) for antibodies against pertussis (pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin), tetanus, and diphtheria antigens, and neutralizing antibodies against pertussis toxin were assessed 4 weeks after vaccination. Safety and tolerability were assessed for solicited post-injection reactions within 7 days after vaccination and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 weeks after vaccination. Of 117 enrolled participants, 80 adults (92%) and 30 adolescents (100%) completed the study. Both Tdap-1018 formulations were generally well tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. Frequency and severity in post-injection reactions after Tdap-1018 administration were similar to Boostrix except for higher proportions of moderate pain for Tdap-1018. In adults at week 4, ratio of GMCs and BRRs for all antigens in the 3000-µg group were similar to or higher than Boostrix, with significantly higher GMC ratios for anti-pertussis toxin (2.1 [1.5-3.0]) and anti-tetanus (1.8 [1.1-2.9]) and significantly higher BRRs for anti-pertussis toxin (difference [95% CI]: 34.5% [13.4-54.6]), anti-pertactin (19.2% [4.4-38.1]), and anti-tetanus (30.0% [3.6-52.7]) antibodies. For adolescents, in the 3000-µg group, ratio of GMCs and BRRs were similar to or higher than Boostrix for all antigens. Both Tdap-1018 formulations showed acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. Tdap-1018 3000 µg induced similar or higher immune responses than Boostrix. ACTRN12620001177943 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=ACTRN12620001177943p).

Immunogenicity of mRNA vs. BBV152 vaccine boosters against Omicron subvariants: Final results from Phase B of the PRIBIVAC study, a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: BBV152 (Covaxin™) is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mixed with an immune adjuvant. We aimed to compare immune responses after booster vaccination with heterologous BBV152 versus homologous mRNA vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, participant-blinded, controlled trial. Fifty mRNA-vaccinated participants were enrolled and randomized to receive an mRNA booster (n = 26) or BBV152 (n = 24). Blood samples were collected pre-vaccination, and at Day 7, 28, 180 and 360 post-booster for analysis of humoral and cellular immune responses. Primary end point was the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titer at day 28. RESULTS: Recruitment began in January 2022 and was terminated early due to the BBV152 group meeting pre-specified criteria for futility. At Day 28 post-boost, mean SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers were lower with BBV152 (2004 IU/mL; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1132-3548) vs mRNA (26,669 IU/mL; 95 % CI, 21,330-33,266; p < 0.0001), but comparable levels of spike-specific CD4 and cytotoxic T-cells were observed. Anti-spike antibody titers remained significantly different at Day 180: BBV152 4467 IU/mL (95 % CI, 1959-10,186) vs mRNA 20,749 IU/mL (95 % CI, 12,303-35,075; p = 0.0017). Levels of surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies against ancestral and Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.2 were significantly higher among mRNA recipients at Day 180, including after adjusting for intercurrent infection. By Day 360, anti-spike antibody titers and neutralizing antibody levels against Omicron subvariants became similar between vaccine groups. By the end of the study, 16 in each arm (mRNA 64 % and BBV152 69.6 %) had breakthrough infections and time to COVID-19 infection between vaccine groups were similar (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titer and surrogate virus neutralizing test levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.1/BA.2/BA.5 were significantly higher at Day 28 and 180 in individuals who received booster vaccination with an mRNA vaccine compared with BBV152. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05142319.

Interim safety and immunogenicity analysis of the EuCorVac-19 COVID-19 vaccine in a Phase 3 randomized, observer-blind, immunobridging trial in the Philippines.

EuCorVac-19 (ECV-19) is a recombinant receptor binding domain (RBD) COVID-19 vaccine that displays the RBD (derived from the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain) on immunogenic liposomes. This study compares the safety and immunogenicity of ECV-19 to the COVISHIELDTM (CS) adenoviral-vectored vaccine. Interim analysis is presented of a randomized, observer-blind, immunobridging Phase 3 trial in the Philippines in 2600 subjects, with treatment and biospecimen collection between October 2022 and January 2023. Healthy male and female adults who received investigational vaccines were 18 years and older, and randomly assigned to ECV-19 (n = 2004) or CS (n = 596) groups. Immunization followed a two-injection, intramuscular regimen with 4 weeks between prime and boost vaccination. Safety endpoints were assessed in all participants and immunogenicity analysis was carried out in a subset (n = 585 in ECV-19 and n = 290 in CS groups). The primary immunological endpoints were superiority of neutralizing antibody response, as well as noninferiority in seroresponse rate (defined as a 4-fold increase in RBD antibody titers from baseline). After prime vaccination, ECV-19 had a lower incidence of local solicited adverse events (AEs) (12.0% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.01), and solicited systemic AEs (13.1 vs. 17.4%, p < 0.01) relative to CS. After the second injection, both ECV-19 and CS had lower overall solicited AEs (7.8% vs. 7.6%). For immunological assessment, 98% of participants had prior COVID-19 exposure (based on the presence of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies) at the time of the initial immunization, without differing baseline antibody levels or microneutralization (MN) titers against the Wuhan strain in the two groups. After prime vaccination, ECV-19 induced higher anti-RBD IgG relative to CS (1,464 vs. 355 BAU/mL, p < 0.001) and higher neutralizing antibody response (1,303 vs. 494 MN titer, p < 0.001). After boost vaccination, ECV-19 and CS maintained those levels of anti-RBD IgG (1367 vs. 344 BAU/mL, p < 0.001) and neutralizing antibodies (1128 vs. 469 MN titer, p < 0.001). ECV-19 also elicited antibodies that better neutralized the Omicron variant, compared to CS (763 vs. 373 MN titer, p < 0.001). Women displayed higher responses to both vaccines than men. The ECV-19 group had a greater seroresponse rate compared to CS (83% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). In summary, both ECV-19 and CS had favorable safety profiles, with ECV-19 showing diminished local and systemic solicited AE after prime immunization. ECV-19 had significantly greater immunogenicity in terms of anti-RBD IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and seroresponse rate. These data establish a relatively favorable safety and immunogenicity profile for ECV-19. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05572879).

Immunogenicity and safety of different combinations involving a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine, inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine, and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years: a phase 4, randomized, open-label study.

Background: Concomitant administration of COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines could reduce the burden on healthcare systems. However, the immunogenicity and safety of various combinations of a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4), and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), particularly in different age groups, is still unknown. Methods: A phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted in Beijing, China. 636 healthy adults were divided into two age groups (18-59 and ≥60 years) and randomized equally into three groups: CoronaVac and IIV4 followed by PPV23; CoronaVac and PPV23 followed by IIV4; or CoronaVac followed by IIV4 and PPV23, with a 28-day interval between vaccinations. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring antibody titers, and safety was monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298800. Results: Co-administration of a third dose of CoronaVac, IIV4, and PPV23 in any combination was safe. Among adults aged 18-59, co-administration with PPV23 maintained non-inferiority of antibody levels for CoronaVac and IIV4, despite a slight reduction in antibody responses. This reduction was not observed in participants ≥60 years. Furthermore, co-administration of IIV4 and PPV23 affected seroconversion rates for both vaccines. Conclusions: Co-administration of the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine with the influenza vaccine, followed by PPV23, may be optimal for adults aged 18-59. In adults ≥60, all vaccine combinations were immunogenic, suggesting a flexible vaccination approach. Since antibody measurements were taken 28 days post-vaccination, ongoing surveillance is essential to assess the longevity of the immune responses.

A review of the immunogenicity and safety of booster doses of omicron variant-containing mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in adults and children.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is an integral pillar of the public health approach to COVID-19. With the emergence of variants of concern that increase transmissibility and escape from vaccine- or infection-induced protection, vaccines have been developed to more closely match the newly circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains to improve protection. The safety and immunogenicity of multiple authorized messenger RNA (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines targeting the omicron sublineage (BA.1, BA.4/BA.5, and XBB.1.5) have been demonstrated in several clinical trials among adults and children. AREAS COVERED: This review will comprehensively detail the available evidence (published through July 2024) from ongoing clinical trials on omicron variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines administered as additional doses in previously vaccinated target demographics. EXPERT OPINION: Across three clinical trials, omicron variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines induced immune responses to vaccine-matched omicron strains as well as ancestral SARS-CoV-2, with a safety and reactogenicity profile comparable to the original mRNA-1273 vaccine. Combined with pivotal data demonstrating the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of the original mRNA-1273 vaccine, these findings support the use of variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines and provide confidence that expeditious development of updated vaccines using this established mRNA platform can maintain protection against COVID-19.

Immunogenicity and transmission-blocking potential of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase in Plasmodium vivax.

Background: Transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) can effectively prevent the community's spread of malaria by targeting the antigens of mosquito sexual stage parasites. At present, only a few candidate antigens have demonstrated transmission-blocking activity (TBA) potential in P. vivax. Quiescin-sulfhydryl oxidase (QSOX) is a sexual stage protein in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei and is associated with a critical role in protein folding by introducing disulfides into unfolded reduced proteins. Here, we reported the immunogenicity and transmission-blocking potency of the PvQSOX in P. vivax. Methods and findings: The full-length recombinant PvQSOX protein (rPvQSOX) was expressed in the Escherichia coli expression system. The anti-rPvQSOX antibodies were generated following immunization with the rPvQSOX in rabbits. A parasite integration of the pvqsox gene into the P. berghei pbqsox gene knockout genome was developed to express full-length PvQSOX protein in P. berghei (Pv-Tr-PbQSOX). In western blot, the anti-rPvQSOX antibodies recognized the native PvQSOX protein expressed in transgenic P. berghei gametocyte and ookinete. In indirect immunofluorescence assays, the fluorescence signal was detected in the sexual stages, including gametocyte, gamete, zygote, and ookinete. Anti-rPvQSOX IgGs obviously inhibited the ookinetes and oocysts development both in vivo and in vitro using transgenic parasites. Direct membrane feeding assays of anti-rPvQSOX antibodies were conducted using four field P. vivax isolates (named isolates #1-4) in Thailand. Oocyst density in mosquitoes was significantly reduced by 32.00, 85.96, 43.52, and 66.03% with rabbit anti-rPvQSOX antibodies, respectively. The anti-rPvQSOX antibodies also showed a modest reduction of infection prevalence by 15, 15, 20, and 22.22%, respectively, as compared to the control, while the effect was insignificant. The variation in the DMFA results may be unrelated to the genetic polymorphisms. Compared to the P.vivax Salvador (Sal) I strain sequences, the pvqsox in isolate #1 showed no amino acid substitution, whereas isolates #2, #3, and #4 all had the M361I substitution. Conclusions: Our results suggest that PvQSOX could serve as a potential P. vivax TBVs candidate, which warrants further evaluation and optimization.

Homologous equivalence study of immunogenicity after third dose of Covid-19 vaccine (recombinant) with an interval of six months after the second dose, comparing the interval of eight and 12 weeks between the first two doses.

BACKGROUND: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, Brazil authorised the Astra Zeneca/Fiocruz vaccine in January 2021. As the Delta variant emerged in May 2021, interval between vaccine doses was adjusted. By September 2021, the Brazilian National Immunisation Program recommended a booster dose for individuals over 70, and later expanded the recommendation to all adults. OBJECTIVES: Assess the equivalence of IgG antibody response against the Covid-19 S protein before and approximately 28 days after the third dose of a Covid-19 recombinant vaccine. Two groups received initial two doses with intervals of eight and 12 weeks. METHODS: This is a phase IV clinical study, uncontrolled, non-randomised. The study proposes calculating the ratio of geometric means titres (GMT) 28 days after the third dose, with a target ratio of confidence interval (CI) between 0.77 and 1.3. FINDINGS: In the primary endpoint, there was no equivalence between the eight- and 12-week intervals with a slight variation favouring the eight-week group. Post-third dose, both groups showed increases titres at 28 days, three months, six months and 12 months. Both groups responded similarly to Delta and Omicron BA.1, with a more significant increase for Delta. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The study showed strong and consistent immune response in all age groups receiving the Covid-19 recombinant vaccine. Third dose elicited an increase in GMT by at least three times aligned with Ministry of Health strategies emphasising Bio-Manguinhos crucial role in pandemic control in the country.

Booster vaccination using bivalent DS-5670a/b is safe and immunogenic against SARS-CoV-2 variants in children aged 5-11 years: a phase 2/3, randomized, active-controlled study.

Background: DS-5670 is a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine platform targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein derived from severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Booster vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with monovalent DS-5670a (incorporating mRNA encoding the RBD from the original SARS-CoV-2 strain) or bivalent DS-5670a/b (original and omicron BA.4-5 RBD antigens) is effective and safe in adults. Data from a phase 2/3 active-controlled, non-inferiority, pediatric study evaluating a third booster dose of DS-5670a/b are reported here. Methods: Children aged 5-11 years who had completed the two-dose primary vaccination series with monovalent BNT162b2 (original strain) at least 3 months prior to enrolment were randomly assigned to receive DS-5670a/b (20 µg of mRNA) or bivalent BNT1 62b2 (original/omicron BA.4-5; 10 µg of mRNA) on Day 1. The primary efficacy endpoint was blood neutralization geometric mean titer (GMT) against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron variant BA.5.2.1) and immune response rate (≥ 4-fold increase in post-vaccination circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity) on Day 29. Results: Among evaluable participants (DS-5670a/b, n = 74; bivalent BNT162b2, n = 75), the adjusted GMT ratio of DS-5670a/b to bivalent BNT162b2 on Day 29 was 1.636 (95% CI, 1.221, 2.190). Immune response rates were ≥ 89% with both study vaccines; adjusted difference 2.6% (95% CI, -7.8, 13.8). The prespecified non-inferiority margins were exceeded, and the study met the primary endpoint. DS-5670a/b also demonstrated broad neutralization activity across recent omicron sublineages and no cases of COVID-19 between Days 8-29 post-administration were reported. There were no novel safety concerns in the pediatric population at data cut-off. Conclusions: Bivalent DS-5670a/b was non-inferior to bivalent BNT162b2 in terms of immunogenicity, and had a manageable safety profile, when administered as a heterologous booster in children aged 5-11 years. Clinical trial registration: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/, identifier jRCT2031220665.

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac®) co-administered with an inactivated enterovirus type 71 vaccine (Inlive®): A phase 4, randomized, controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04993365 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

MVA-based vaccine candidates expressing SARS-CoV-2 prefusion-stabilized spike proteins of the Wuhan, Beta or Omicron BA.1 variants protect transgenic K18-hACE2 mice against Omicron infection and elicit robust and broad specific humoral and cellular immune responses.

Despite the decrease in mortality and morbidity due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of infections due to Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 remains high. The mutations acquired by these subvariants, mainly concentrated in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), have caused a shift in infectivity and transmissibility, leading to a loss of effectiveness of the first authorized COVID-19 vaccines, among other reasons, by neutralizing antibody evasion. Hence, the generation of new vaccine candidates adapted to Omicron subvariants is of special interest in an effort to overcome this immune evasion. Here, an optimized COVID-19 vaccine candidate, termed MVA-S(3P_BA.1), was developed using a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vector expressing a full-length prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein from the Omicron BA.1 variant. The immunogenicity and efficacy induced by MVA-S(3P_BA.1) were evaluated in mice in a head-to-head comparison with the previously generated vaccine candidates MVA-S(3P) and MVA-S(3Pbeta), which express prefusion-stabilized S proteins from Wuhan strain and Beta variant, respectively, and with a bivalent vaccine candidate composed of a combination of MVA-S(3P) and MVA-S(3P_BA.1). The results showed that all four vaccine candidates elicited, after a single intramuscular dose, protection of transgenic K18-hACE2 mice challenged with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, reducing viral loads, histopathological lesions, and levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the lungs. They also elicited anti-S IgG and neutralizing antibodies against various Omicron subvariants, with MVA-S(3P_BA.1) and the bivalent vaccine candidate inducing higher titers. Additionally, an intranasal immunization in C57BL/6 mice with all four vaccine candidates induced systemic and mucosal S-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell and humoral immune responses, and the bivalent vaccine candidate induced broader immune responses, eliciting antibodies against the ancestral Wuhan strain and different Omicron subvariants. These results highlight the use of MVA as a potent and adaptable vaccine vector against new emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the promising feature of combining multivalent MVA vaccine candidates.

Pre- and post-Ad26.COV2·S booster dose antibody levels predict COVID-19 disease risk.

Identifying immune correlates of risk following COVID-19 vaccine boosters has become paramount as a result of the challenges in generating additional efficacy data. The trial data described here was collected in the United States, with a large part of the study conduct coinciding with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant. The vaccine trial involved the administration of a booster dose of Ad26.COV2·S at least 6 months after primary vaccination with either a single dose of Ad26.COV2·S or a 2-dose BNT162b2 vaccine regimen. Immunogenicity was assessed through Wuhan Spike binding antibodies (bAb), neutralizing antibodies (nAb), and Omicron BA.1 cross-neutralizing antibodies (nAb BA.1) at Day 1 (pre-boost), Day 15-, and 6-months post-boost. Immune correlates analyses demonstrate that, higher titers of bAb, nAb, and nAb BA.1 at Day 15 were consistently associated with a lower risk of symptomatic COVID-19 following a booster dose of Ad26.COV2·S, irrespective of the primary vaccine regimen. Similar results were obtained using multivariable analyses. Furthermore, Day 1 nAb levels against the Wuhan reference strain exhibited a statistically significant inverse relationship with the risk of symptomatic COVID-19. These findings highlight the value of assessing immune correlates for vaccine boosters, especially in the context of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Clinical trials registration:NCT04999111.

Efficacy and safety of Abdala COVID-19 subunit vaccine in children and adolescents: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (MEÑIQUE).

Objectives We evaluated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of Abdala, a protein subunit vaccine for 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in children and adolescents. Methods A phase 2, open-label, single-arm clinical trial was carried out. Subjects aged 3 to 18 years were eligible. Abdala vaccine was administered intramuscularly at 0-14-28 days. The main endpoints were safety and the immunobridging analysis with a non-inferiority design, to infer the efficacy of the vaccine in paediatric population based on the comparison of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to SARS-CoV-2, with adults (19-21 years). The trial is registered with the Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials, RPCEC00000390. Results From September 13th to September 17th, 2021, 703 participants were included in the context of a predominantly SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant circulation. The number of individuals who experienced adverse reactions was 264/703 (37·6%). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and occurred at the injection site, which resolved within the first 24-48 h. There were no reports of severe adverse events. For the non-inferiority comparison of 297 children (3-11 years) with 297 adults, the geometric mean (GMT) ratio of SARS-CoV-2 NAb was 0·87 (95% CI 0·69-1·08) and 1·07 (0·82-1·39) in the same comparison for 203 adolescents (12-18 years) and 203 adults. For both age groups, the lower limit of GMT was higher than 0·67. The differences in seroresponse rates of Nab for children were 1% (-2%, 4%) and -3% (-7%, 1%) for adolescents, higher than -10% in both age groups. Conclusions The Abdala vaccine was safe and immunogenic in a paediatric population aged 3-18 years, with inferred efficacy based on non-inferior analysis. The vaccine is very suitable to fit into massive vaccination strategies, considering the advantages of using the same vaccine strength (RBD 50 µg) and schedule of administration for both adults and children, as well as the easy storage and handling conditions at 2-8 °C.

Focusing HIV-1 Gag T cell responses to highly conserved regions by DNA vaccination in HVTN 119.

BACKGROUNDAn HIV-1 DNA vaccine composed of 7 highly conserved, structurally important elements (conserved elements, CE) of p24Gag was tested in a phase I randomized, double-blind clinical trial (HVTN 119, NCT03181789) in people without HIV. DNA vaccination of CE prime/CE+p55Gag boost was compared with p55Gag.METHODSTwo groups (n = 25) received 4 DNA vaccinations (CE/CE+p55Gag or p55Gag) by intramuscular injection/electroporation, including IL-12 DNA adjuvant. The placebo group (n = 6) received saline. Participants were followed for safety and tolerability. Immunogenicity was assessed for T cell and antibody responses.RESULTSBoth regimens were safe and generally well tolerated. The p24CE vaccine was immunogenic and significantly boosted by CE+p55Gag (64% CD4+, P = 0.037; 42% CD8+, P = 0.004). CE+p55Gag induced responses to 5 of 7 CE, compared with only 2 CE by p55Gag DNA, with a higher response to CE5 in 30% of individuals (P = 0.006). CE+p55Gag induced significantly higher CD4+ CE T cell breadth (0.68 vs. 0.22 CE; P = 0.029) and a strong trend for overall T cell breadth (1.14 vs. 0.52 CE; P = 0.051). Both groups developed high cellular and humoral responses. p24CE vaccine-induced CD4+ CE T cell responses correlated (P = 0.007) with p24Gag antibody responses.CONCLUSIONThe CE/CE+p55Gag DNA vaccine induced T cell responses to conserved regions in p24Gag, increasing breadth and epitope recognition throughout p55Gag compared with p55Gag DNA. Vaccines focusing immune responses by priming responses to highly conserved regions could be part of a comprehensive HIV vaccine strategy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinical Trials.gov NCT03181789FUNDINGHVTN, NIAID/NIH.