Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 6.703
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(37): e39421, 2024 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287270

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment method systematically before and after implementation in terms of average hospitalization day, cost and care quality. METHOD: Restricted the period from 2019 to May 31, 2023, we use 6 databases from CNKI, Wipu, Wanfang, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and web of science. With the related study, we extract the data about DRG, then we conducted meta-analysis of the data about length of stay (LOS) and cost by RevMan 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software. Care quality is in conjunction with literature reports. RESULT: About 24 articles were included, covering 2 indicators: average hospitalization expenses and days. Meta-analysis shows that implementing DRG payment method has an advantage in terms of average hospital stay (pooled effect: -1.13%, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.84, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. There is also an advantage in average hospitalization expenses (pooled effect: -2.58, 95% CI: -3.38 to -1.79, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The use of DRG payment method can effectively reduce LOS and average hospitalization expenses. However, quality of care may decline with DRG adoption.


Asunto(s)
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Costos/métodos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía
2.
JBJS Rev ; 12(9)2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226392

RESUMEN

¼ We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of different protocols of extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (E-PAP) following adult spinal surgery.¼ Both stratified (randomized controlled trials only) and nonstratified (all studies) analyses demonstrated that E-PAP has no significant value in reducing the rate of surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, or superficial SSI.¼ Notably, the E-PAP protocols were associated with a significant increase in the length of hospital stay, resulting in an additional expenditure of $244.4 per episode for the E-PAP 72 hours protocol compared with PAP 24 hours and $309.8 per episode for the E-PAP >48 hours protocol compared with PAP <48 hours.¼ E-PAP does not demonstrate any significant reduction in the rate of SSIs following spine surgery. However, these extended protocols were significantly associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay and higher overall projected costs.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Columna Vertebral , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/economía , Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
3.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 83: 469-474, 2024 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39248365

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Deep neck space infections (DNSI), caused by the spread of an odontogenic infection to the floor of the mouth and neck, are potentially life-threatening but preventable. We explored the total cost of illness (COI) for patients with DNSI of odontogenic origin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, register-based, multi-centre study of the health economics of DNSI treatment. Included were patients aged > 18 years who were treated in hospital for DNSI of odontogenic origin. Subjects were identified from the regional healthcare database VEGA based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and surgical procedure codes. The cost per patient (CPP) values for the hospital care, prescription medications and sick leave were extracted. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were included. The average length of the hospital stay was 6 days. Total COI was estimated as 15,400 EUR per patient and 2,280,000 EUR in total. Direct costs accounted for 93% of the COI, and indirect costs were 7%. CONCLUSION: The total COI for patients with DNSI of odontogenic origin was six-fold higher than the average COI for patients in otorhinolaryngology (ORL) care. Preventing DNSI will entail substantial cost savings for the specialised healthcare units and will have a significant impact on the patients.


Asunto(s)
Cuello , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Costo de Enfermedad , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(9): e2433962, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287943

RESUMEN

Importance: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a traditional Medicare bundled payment program for lower-extremity joint replacement, is associated with care for patients outside traditional Medicare. Whether CJR model outcomes have differed by patient race or ethnicity outside of traditional Medicare is unclear. Objective: To evaluate outcomes associated with the CJR model among Hispanic patients not enrolled in traditional Medicare. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used hospitalization data from California's Patient Discharge Dataset for all patients who underwent lower-extremity joint replacement in California between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. In California, 3 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were randomly selected to participate in CJR in April 2016. Hospitals not participating in other Medicare Alternative Payment Models were included in the treated group if they were in these 3 MSAs and in the control group if they were in the remaining 23 MSAs. The data analysis was performed between October 1 and December 31, 2023. Exposure: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program implementation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay and home discharge rates by race and ethnicity. Home discharge status included self-care, the use of home health services, and hospice care at home. Event study, difference-in-differences, and triple differences models were used to estimate differential changes in health care service use by race and ethnicity for patients in the treated MSAs compared with the control MSAs before vs after CJR implementation. Results: Of 309 834 hospitalizations (patient mean [SD] age, 68.3 [11.3] years; 60.6% women; 14.8% Hispanic; 72.4% non-Hispanic White), 48.0% were in treated MSAs and 52.0% in control MSAs. The CJR program was associated with an increase in home discharge rates for patients without traditional Medicare coverage; however, the increase differed by patient race and ethnicity. The increase was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients with Medicare Advantage and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients without Medicare compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study shows that CJR program outcomes differed by race and ethnicity for patients covered outside traditional Medicare, with home discharge rates increasing more for Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest the importance of considering differential outcomes of Medicare payment policies for racial and ethnic minority patient populations beyond the initially targeted groups.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , California , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 130, 2024 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly popular in the post-operative management of abdominal surgery. Published data suggest that patients on ERAS protocols have fewer minor and major complications, and highlight a reduction in medical morbidity (such as urinary and respiratory infections). Limited data is available on surgical complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on post-operative complications and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the impact of this protocol on cost-effectiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2022, 532 colectomies for colorectal cancer (CRC) were performed. A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital on the cohort of patients, aged 18 years and older, operated on for non-urgent colorectal cancer. The impact on post-operative complications, hospital stay and economic impact was analysed in two groups: patients managed under ERAS and non-ERAS protocol. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching 1:1, each cohort included 71 patients, and clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced in terms of tumour type, surgical technique and surgical approach. ERAS patients experienced fewer infectious complications and a shorter postoperative stay (p < 0.001). In particular, they had an 8.5% reduction in anastomotic dehiscence (p = 0.012) and surgical wound infections (p = 0.029). After analysis of medical complications, no statistically significant differences were identified in urinary tract infections, pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding or sepsis. ERAS protocol was more efficient and cost-effective than the control group, with an overall savings of 37,673.44€. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital was cost-effective and associated with a reduction in post-operative complications, especially infectious complications.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Colectomía/economía , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Can Respir J ; 2024: 2639080, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39280690

RESUMEN

This study aimed to develop nomograms to predict high hospitalization costs and prolonged stays in hospitalized acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), also known as pAECOPD. A total of 635 patients with pAECOPD were included in this observational study and divided into training and testing sets. Variables were initially screened using univariate analysis, and then further selected using a backward stepwise regression. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in both the training and testing sets. Finally, the logistic regression analysis showed that elevated white blood cell count (WBC>10 × 109 cells/l), hypoalbuminemia, pulmonary encephalopathy, respiratory failure, diabetes, and respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) admissions were risk factors for predicting high hospitalization costs in pAECOPD patients. The AUC value was 0.756 (95% CI: 0.699-0.812) in the training set and 0.792 (95% CI: 0.718-0.867) in the testing set. The calibration plot and DCA curve indicated the model had good predictive performance. Furthermore, decreased total protein, pulmonary encephalopathy, reflux esophagitis, and RICU admissions were risk factors for predicting prolonged stays in pAECOPD patients. The AUC value was 0.629 (95% CI: 0.575-0.682) in the training set and 0.620 (95% CI: 0.539-0.701) in the testing set. The calibration plot and DCA curve indicated the model had good predictive performance. We developed and validated two nomograms for predicting high hospitalization costs and prolonged stay, respectively, among hospitalized patients with pAECOPD. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2000039959.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Nomogramas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/economía , Neumonía/epidemiología , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Modelos Logísticos , Recuento de Leucocitos
7.
Neurosurgery ; 95(4): 779-788, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39283111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bundled payment for care improvement advanced (BPCIA) is a voluntary alternative payment model administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services using value-based care to reduce costs by incentivizing care coordination and improved quality. We aimed to identify drivers of negative financial performance in BPCIA among patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients enrolled in BPCIA undergoing spinal fusion with DRGs 453, 454, 455, 459, and 460 from 2018 to 2022. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with negative financial performance and compare nonelective vs elective surgeries. RESULTS: We identified 172 cases, of which 24% (n = 41) had negative financial performance and 9% (n = 16) were nonelective cases. Nonelective surgery (P < .001, odds ratios 19.81), greater levels instrumented (P < .001), and no anterior procedure (P = .001) were associated with negative financial performance. Surgical outcomes associated with negative financial performance and factors more common in nonelective cases respectively included higher hospital length of stay (P < .001, P = .005), nonhome discharge (P < .001, P < .001), 90-day hospital readmission (P < .001, P < .001), 90-day additional nonspine surgery (P = .01, P < .001), and less days at home of the 90 days (P < .001, P = .01). Nonelective surgeries had higher total spend (P = .01), readmission spend (P = .03), skilled nursing facility spend (P = .02), durable medical equipment spend (P = .003), and professional billing spend (P = .04) despite similar target pricing (P = .60), all of which resulted in greater financial loss compared with elective surgeries (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Nonelective spinal surgery is an independent preoperative predictor of negative financial performance in BPCIA. Nonelective spinal surgeries are more likely than elective surgeries to have higher length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day hospital readmission, 90-day additional nonspine surgeries, and less time spent at home during the bundled period, all of which contribute to higher health care utilization. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should consider incorporating nonelective spine surgery into risk-adjustment models.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Medicare/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 301: 105-113, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116478

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As a minimally invasive technique, robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) offers surgical advantages and significant reduction in morbidity compared to open surgery. Despite the increasing use of RAH in benign gynaecology, there is limited data on its cost-effectiveness, especially in a European context. Our goal is to assess the costs of the different hysterectomy approaches, to describe their clinical outcomes, and to evaluate the impact of introduction of RAH on the rates of different types of hysterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cost-analysis was performed for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications. Abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and RAH were included. We considered the costs of operating room and hospital stay for the different hysterectomy techniques using the "Activity Centre-Care program model". We report on intra- and postoperative complications for the different approaches as well as their cost relationship. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2021, 830 patients were operated; 67 underwent VH (8%), 108 LAVH (13%), 351 LH (42%), 148 RAH (18%) and 156 AH (19%). After the implementation and learning curve of a dedicated program for RAH in 2018, AH declined from 27.3% in 2014-2017, to 22.1% in 2018 and 6.9 % in 2019-2021. The reintervention rate was 3-4% for all surgical techniques. Pharmacological interventions and blood transfusions were performed after AH in 28%, and in 17-22% of the other approaches. AH had the highest hospital stay cost with an average of €2236.40. Mean cost of the hospital stay ranged from €1136.77-€1560.66 for minimally invasive techniques. The average total costs for RAH were €6528.10 compared to €4400.95 for AH. CONCLUSION: Implementation of RAH resulted in a substantial decrease of open surgery rate. However, RAH remains the most expensive technique in our cohort, mainly due to high material and depreciation costs. Therefore, RAH should not be considered for every patient, but for those who would otherwise need more invasive surgery, with higher risk of complications. Future prospective studies should focus on the societal costs and patient reported outcomes, in order to do cost-benefit analysis and further evaluate the exact value of RAH in the current healthcare setting.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Universitarios , Histerectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Histerectomía/economía , Histerectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Adulto , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(17): e035367, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A technologically integrated, multidisciplinary approach to stroke rehabilitation service was delivered and embedded into conventional health care practice. This article reports an evaluation of cost-effectiveness analysis of a new Virtual Multidisciplinary Stroke Care Clinic (VMSCC) service for community-dwelling survivors of stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Adults with a first/recurrent ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke were recruited from 10 hospitals. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive the VMSCC service (individual virtual consultations with a registered nurse, home blood pressure telemonitoring, and unlimited access to an online resource platform) plus usual care or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios expressed as incremental cost per emergency admission reduced, and day of hospitalization reduced over the study period. A total of 256 participants (intervention group n=141 versus control group n=115) with complete cost and health care use data were included in the cost-effectiveness analyses. The VMSCC service, on average, resulted in a greater reduction in the number of emergency admission (-0.06 [95% bootstrapped CI, -0.14 to 0.01]) and fewer days of hospitalization (-0.08, [95% bootstrapped CI -0.40 to 0.24]) but incurred a higher total cost of HK$375 (95% bootstrapped CI, -2103 to 2743) compared with the usual care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the VMSCC service compared with the usual care were HK$6070 and HK$4826 per an emergency admission and a day of hospital stay reduced respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides preliminary but not confirmative evidence that the VMSCC service could be more effective but more costly than usual care in reducing health service use. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800016101.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vida Independiente , Telemedicina/economía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/rehabilitación , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 22: eGS0473, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39194070

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent surgical treatment for rotator cuff tears using open and arthroscopic techniques, and to evaluate the direct costs involved. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with analysis of the data of patients who were referred to two private hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil for surgical repair of the rotator cuff from January 2018 to September 2019. Clinical outcomes were assessed using functional scores (SPADI and QuickDASH) and a quality of life questionnaire (EuroQoL). Procedure costs were calculated relative to each hospital's costliest procedure. RESULTS: Data from 362 patients were analyzed. The mean patient age was 57 years (SD= 10.46), with a slight male predominance (53.9%). Arthroscopic procedures were more common than open procedures (95.6% versus 4.4%). Significant clinical improvement was reported in 84.8% of the patients. The factors associated with increased surgery costs were arthroscopic technique (increase of 29.2%), age (increase of 0.6% per year), and length of stay (increase of 18.9% per day of hospitalization). CONCLUSION: Rotator cuff repair surgery is a highly effective procedure, associated with favorable clinical outcomes and improvement in life quality, and low rates of complications. Arthroscopic surgery tends to be costlier than open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Calidad de Vida , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/economía , Artroscopía/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Brasil , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Costos y Análisis de Costo
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e081822, 2024 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39181561

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Liver cirrhosis is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with a heavy load on healthcare systems. We analysed the trends in hospitalisations for cirrhosis in Switzerland. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large nationwide inpatient database, years between 1998 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalisations for cirrhosis of adult patients were selected. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalisations with either a primary diagnosis of cirrhosis or a cirrhosis-related primary diagnosis with a mandatory presence of cirrhosis as a secondary diagnosis were considered following the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes. Trends in demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were analysed. Causes and costs of cirrhosis-related hospitalisations were available from 2012 onwards. RESULTS: Cirrhosis-related hospitalisations increased from 1631 in 1998 to 4052 in 2020. Of the patients, 68.7% were men. Alcohol-related liver disease was the leading cause, increasing from 44.1% (95% CI, 42.4% to 45.9%) in 2012 to 47.9% (95% CI, 46.4% to 49.5%) in 2020. Assessed by exclusion of other coded causes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was the second cause at 42.7% (95% CI, 41.2% to 44.3%) in 2020. Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis decreased from 12.3% (95% CI, 11.2% to 13.5%) in 2012 to 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7% to 3.8%) in 2020. Median length of stay decreased from 11 to 8 days. Hospitalisations with an intensive care unit stay increased from 9.8% (95% CI, 8.4% to 11.4%) to 15.6% (95% CI, 14.5% to 16.8%). In-hospital mortality decreased from 12.1% (95% CI, 10.5% to 13.8%) to 9.7% (95% CI, 8.8% to 10.7%). Total costs increased from 54.4 million US$ (51.4 million €) in 2012 to 92.6 million US$ (87.5 million €) in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis-related hospitalisations and related costs increased in Switzerland from 1998 to 2020 but in-hospital mortality decreased. Alcohol-related liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease were the most prevalent and preventable aetiologies of cirrhosis-related hospitalisations.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Cirrosis Hepática , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Suiza/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/economía
12.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 155, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39113064

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the composition and influencing factors of epilepsy patients' hospitalization expenses, thus providing a reference for reducing the disease burden of epilepsy patients in low- and middle-income developing countries. METHODS: A total of 4206 hospitalized cases of epilepsy from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to understand the patient cost composition, path analysis was used to understand the direct and indirect factors of hospitalization expenses. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, the average hospitalization expenses for epilepsy patients was 4,299.93 RMB yuan, and the average length of stay was 2.47 days. The highest proportion of hospitalization expenses was diagnosis costs (> 50%), followed by comprehensive medical service costs and drug costs. In terms of the total effect coefficient, the major factors affecting the hospitalization expenses were length of stay (0.880), emergency admission(0.463), and the comorbidities and complications(> 0.250). Hospital length of stay, discharge mode(death) and number of hospitalizations(2 times) affect hospitalization expenses through direct effect. Long-term hospitalization (> 30 days), admission routes(emergency), the comorbidities and complications, presence of drug allergy, and age also affect hospitalization expenses through indirect effects. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis costs and length of stay are important factors affecting the medical expenses of epilepsy inpatients. In general, the quality control of the hospital is good, but it still needs to standardize the diagnosis and treatment behavior of medical staff through the clinical path.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Epilepsia/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
13.
Clin Transplant ; 38(9): e15438, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189807

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frailty, a measure of physiological aging and reserve, has been validated as a prognostic indicator of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. However, large-scale analyses of the independent association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) are lacking. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years) undergoing LT were identified in the 2016-2020 National Readmissions Database. Frailty was defined using the binary Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the independent association of frailty with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and costs. RESULTS: Of an estimated 34 442 patients undergoing LT, 8265 (24%) were frail. After adjustment, frailty was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.80; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.49-1.18), postoperative length of stay (ß + 11 days; 95% CI: +10, +12), and hospitalization costs (+$86 880; 95% CI: +75 660, +98 100), as well as a two-fold increase in relative risk of nonhome discharge (AOR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.90-2.49). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, complications, and resource utilization among LT recipients. As the proportion of frail LT patients continues to rise, our findings underscore the need for novel risk-stratification and individualized care protocols for such vulnerable patients.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Fragilidad/economía , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Adulto , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(8): 1511-1513, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160723

RESUMEN

In addition to the clinical burden of trauma, the financial burden is an important aspect of care globally, especially for patients in low- and middle-income countries. The current retrospective review was done of data from January 2015 to December 2020 related to patients of oral maxillofacial trauma management in a tertiary care setting. Analysis of variance was used to determine the mean difference in the cost incurred depending upon the type of trauma and the number of bone plates used in fracture management. Pearson correlation was applied to explore any correlation involving patient age, aetiology and type of fracture, number of bone plates employed and the length of stay in the hospital. No statistically significant differences were noted in the cost among the different groups. The cost of care was significantly (p<0.001) correlated to the length of stay. Other variables, such as the type of fractures and the number of plates, had no significant impact (p>0.05).


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Pakistán , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/economía , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/terapia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Placas Óseas/economía , Fracturas Mandibulares/economía , Fracturas Mandibulares/terapia , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Anciano , Niño , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Maxilares/economía , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Fracturas Maxilares/terapia
15.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1046-1052, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39092467

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate hepatitis A-related healthcare resource use and costs in the US. METHODS: The Merative Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was retrospectively analyzed for hepatitis A-related inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) claims from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. We calculated the hepatitis A incidence proportion per 100,000 enrollees, healthcare resource utilization, and costs (in 2020 USD). Results were stratified by age, gender, and select comorbidities. RESULTS: The overall hepatitis A incidence proportion was 6.1 per 100,000 enrollees. Among individuals with ≥1 hepatitis A-related claim, the majority (92.6%) had ≥1 outpatient visit related to hepatitis A; 9.1% were hospitalized and 4.2% had ≥1 ED visit. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of hospital stay was 5.2 (8.1) days; the mean (SD) number of outpatient and ED visits were 1.3 (1.3) and 1.1 (0.6), respectively. The incidence proportion per 100,000 was higher among adults than children (7.5 vs. 1.5), individuals with HIV than those without (126.7 vs. 5.9), and individuals with chronic liver disease than those without (143.6 vs. 3.8). The total mean (SD)/median (interquartile range, IQR) per-patient cost for hepatitis A-related care was $2,520 ($10,899)/$156 ($74-$529) and the mean cost of hospitalization was 18.7 times higher than that of outpatient care ($17,373 vs. $928). LIMITATIONS: The study data included only a commercially insured population and may not be representative of all individuals. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, hepatitis A is associated with a substantial economic burden among privately insured individuals in the US.


Hepatitis A is an acute liver infection caused by the hepatitis A virus. In the US, safe and effective vaccines for hepatitis A have been available since 1996. Vaccination recommendations include children (all children aged 12­23 months and previously unvaccinated children aged 2­18 years old) and adults at risk of infection or severe disease (e.g. international travelers, men who have sex with men, persons experiencing homelessness, persons with chronic liver disease or persons with HIV infection). Since 2016, the US has experienced person-to-person outbreaks of hepatitis A, primarily affecting unvaccinated individuals who use drugs or are experiencing homelessness. To better understand the impact of hepatitis A in the US, we assessed healthcare resource use and costs in 15,435 patients with hepatitis A from 2012 to 2018 in the Merative Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. We found that slightly more than 6 per 100,000 enrollees had hepatitis A from 2012 to 2018 and the number of people treated for hepatitis A per 100,000 was highest for people living with HIV or with chronic liver disease. The majority (92.6%) of people reported at least an outpatient visit, 9.1% were hospitalized, and 4.2% had an emergency department visit. The average cost for hepatitis A-related care was $2,520 per patient and was 18.7 times higher for hospitalized patients ($17,373) than for patients treated in outpatient care ($928). Our results are limited by the generalizability of the dataset, which is a convenience sample of private insurance claims, and are therefore unlikely to capture groups at high-risk for hepatitis A, such as individuals experiencing homelessness. In conclusion, hepatitis A leads to considerable healthcare costs for privately insured individuals in the US.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis A , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hepatitis A/economía , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Comorbilidad , Factores Sexuales , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Anciano , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 887, 2024 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, initiated by China's National Healthcare Security Administration, is designed to enhance healthcare efficiency and manage rising healthcare costs. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the DIP payment reform on inpatient care in a specialized obstetrics and gynecology hospital, with a focus on its implications for various patient groups. METHODS: To assess the DIP policy's effects, we employed the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach. This method was used to analyze changes in total hospital costs and Length of Stay (LOS) across different patient groups, particularly within select DIP categories. The study involved a comprehensive examination of the DIP policy's influence pre- and post-implementation. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the implementation of the DIP policy led to a significant increase in both total costs and LOS for the insured group relative to the self-paying group. The study further identified variations within DIP groups both before and after the reform. In-depth analysis of specific disease groups revealed that the insured group experienced notably higher total costs and LOS compared to the self-paying group. CONCLUSIONS: The DIP reform has led to several challenges, including upcoding and diagnostic ambiguity, because of the pursuit of higher reimbursements. These findings underscore the necessity for continuous improvement of the DIP payment system to effectively tackle these challenges and optimize healthcare delivery and cost management.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , China , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto
17.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 465, 2024 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090376

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of cannabis use disorder (CUD) on inpatient morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient cost (IC) of patients undergoing urologic oncologic surgery. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2014 was analyzed for patients undergoing prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy (n = 1,612,743). CUD was identified using ICD-9 codes. Complex-survey procedures were used to compare patients with and without CUD. Inpatient major complications, high LOS (4th quartile), and high IC (4th quartile) were examined as endpoints. Univariable and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to compare groups. RESULTS: The incidence of CUD increased from 51 per 100,000 admissions in 2003 to 383 per 100,000 in 2014 (p < 0.001). Overall, 3,503 admissions had CUD. Patients with CUD were more frequently younger (50 vs. 61), male (86% vs. 78.4%), Black (21.7% vs. 9.2%), and had 1st quartile income (36.1% vs. 20.6%); all p < 0.001. CUD had no impact on any complication rates (all p > 0.05). However, CUD patients had higher LOS (3 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and IC ($15,609 vs. $12,415; p < 0.001). On MVA, CUD was not an independent predictor of major complications (p = 0.6). Conversely, CUD was associated with high LOS (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.59) and high IC (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59), both p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CUD at the time of urologic oncologic surgery is increasing. Future research should look into the cause of our observed phenomena and how to decrease LOS and IC in CUD patients.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Abuso de Marihuana , Humanos , Masculino , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Abuso de Marihuana/economía , Cistectomía/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Costos de Hospital , Anciano , Nefrectomía/economía , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Urológicas/economía , Prostatectomía/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/economía , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización/economía , Incidencia
18.
Ann Palliat Med ; 13(4): 766-777, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39108246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People approaching end of life account disproportionately for health care costs, and the majority of these costs accrue in hospitals. The economic evidence base to improve value of care to this population is thin. Natural experiment methods may be helpful in bridging evidence gaps with credible causal estimates from routine data, but these methods have seldom been applied in this field. This study aimed to evaluate the association between timely palliative care consultation and length of stay for adults with serious illness admitted to acute hospital in Ireland. METHODS: In primary analysis we evaluated if timely palliative care receipt following emergency hospital inpatient admission impacted length of stay (LOS); in secondary analysis we verified if palliative medicine service (PMS) implementation co-occurred with any changes in in-hospital mortality, and we estimated cost differences associated with any change in LOS. This was a secondary analysis on routinely collected data for acute admissions to public hospitals in Ireland. We used difference-in-differences analysis to exploit the staggered implementation of PMS teams at acute public hospitals in Ireland between 2010 and 2015. We identified palliative care receipt following PMS implementation using ICD-10 codes, and we matched admissions involving a palliative care interaction to admissions in years prior to PMS implementation using propensity score weights. RESULTS: Our primary analytic sample included 4,314 observations, of whom 608 (14%) received timely palliative care. We estimated that the intervention reduced LOS by nearly two days, with an estimated associated saving per admission of €1,820. These analyses were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses on regression specification, weighting strategy and site selection. Proportion of admissions ending in death did not change following PMS implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt interaction between suitable patients and palliative care can improve the quality and efficiency of care to this population. Many patients receive palliative care later in the hospital stay, which does not yield cost-savings. Future studies can extend and strengthen our approach with better data, as well as using different methods to understand how to trigger palliative care early in a hospital admission and realise available gains.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Irlanda , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/economía
19.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 320, 2024 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133350

RESUMEN

Robotic surgery has been increasingly adopted in various surgical fields, but the cost-effectiveness of this technology remains controversial due to its high cost and limited improvements in clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore the health economic implications of robotic pancreatic surgery, to investigate its impact on hospitalization costs and consumption of various medical resources. Data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at our institution were collected and divided into robotic and traditional groups. Statistical analyses of hospitalization costs, length of stay, costs across different service categories, and subgroup cost analyses based on age, BMI class, and procedure received were performed using t tests and linear regression. Although the total hospitalization cost for the robotic group was significantly higher than that for the traditional group, there was a notable reduction in the cost of medical consumables. The reduction was more prominent among elderly patients, obese patients, and those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, which could be attributed to the technological advantages of the robotic surgery platform that largely facilitate blood control, tissue protection, and suturing. The study concluded that despite higher overall costs, robotic pancreatic surgery offers significant savings in medical consumables, particularly benefiting certain patient subgroups. The findings provide valuable insights into the economic viability of robotic surgery, supporting its adoption from a health economics perspective.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Humanos , China , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Pancreatectomía/economía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/economía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Adulto , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Páncreas/cirugía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1124-1133, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39211950

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Research relating to Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has found the anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach improves both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes when compared to other THA approaches. This study compares the costs and outcomes of the ABMS approach and standard of care (SOC) to determine the relative cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was utilized to estimate intraoperative outcomes (i.e. length of procedure, length of stay (LOS), and transfusion rates) and 90-day postoperative complications (deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation). Data relating to postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes, and costs (adjusted to 2023 USD) were obtained from the literature. Model results were presented as incremental costs and complications avoided using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. We conducted both one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA), varying each parameter individually within a specific range, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) where parameters were varied simultaneously. In scenario analysis, ABMS was also compared to the posterior approach (PA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) individually. RESULTS: ABMS THA was found to have superior results compared to SOC THA over a 90-day time horizon since it decreased major complications by 0.00186 per patient and cost by $3,851 per patient. The PSA found the ABMS approach dominates SOC and is cost-effective in approximately 98.29% and 100% of 10,000 iterations, respectively. Comparing ABMS with only PA procedures increased cost savings per patient to $4,766 while it decreased to $3,242 when comparing ABMS to only DAA procedures. Length of procedure, LOS, and discharge disposition were the main cost drivers. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates the ABMS approach for THA is a cost-effective technique when compared to PA and DAA, which may provide an opportunity for cost savings to the healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Femenino , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Masculino , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA